Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1999 Sep;72(2):215–234. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-215

Food and cocaine self-administration by baboons: effects of alternatives.

R W Foltin 1
PMCID: PMC1284735  PMID: 10503299

Abstract

The effects of the availability of an alternative reinforcer on responding maintained by food pellets or drug solutions were examined in 8 adult male baboons (Papio hamadrayas anubis). During daily 23-hr experimental sessions, baboons had access to both food pellets and fluid under a two-choice procedure, in which the response requirement, under a fixed-ratio schedule, differed for the two commodities. There were no restrictions on access to water, which was continuously available from a spout at the rear of each cage. In Experiment 1, the fixed-ratio requirement, or cost, for fluid delivery remained constant while the fixed-ratio requirement for pellets was changed every 2 or 3 days when (a) no fluid, (b) a dilute dextrose vehicle, (c) 0.008 mg/kg per delivery cocaine, (d) 0.016 mg/kg per delivery cocaine, or (e) 0.032 mg/kg per delivery cocaine was available concurrently. In Experiment 1, progressively increasing the response requirement for pellets decreased pellet intake, but for 4 baboons pellet intake at maximum pellet cost was lower when cocaine, compared to the vehicle, was available. Increasing the response requirement for pellets had variable effects on vehicle intake. However, increasing the response requirement for pellets increased intake of at least one dose of cocaine to a greater extent than vehicle in all 8 baboons. Thus, cocaine could be considered a more effective economic substitute than vehicle for pellets. Experiment 2 systematically varied the order in which the response requirements for a pellet delivery were presented and added a control condition in which cocaine doses, yoked to the amount self-administered, were given three times during the session by the experimenter. Again, pellet intake at maximal pellet cost was lower when cocaine, compared to the vehicle, was available. In contrast, experimenter-given cocaine doses did not alter responding maintained by pellets. Thus, the effects of self-administered cocaine on responding maintained by food pellets differed from the effects of experimenter-given cocaine on responding maintained by food pellets.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (275.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bauman R. A., Raslear T. G., Hursh S. R., Shurtleff D., Simmons L. Substitution and caloric regulation in a closed economy. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Mar;65(2):401–422. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bickel W. K., DeGrandpre R. J., Higgins S. T. The behavioral economics of concurrent drug reinforcers: a review and reanalysis of drug self-administration research. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1995 Apr;118(3):250–259. doi: 10.1007/BF02245952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carroll M. E., Lac S. T., Nygaard S. L. A concurrently available nondrug reinforcer prevents the acquisition or decreases the maintenance of cocaine-reinforced behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1989;97(1):23–29. doi: 10.1007/BF00443407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carroll M. E., Meisch R. A. Effects of food deprivation on etonitazene consumption in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1979 Jan;10(1):155–159. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(79)90182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carroll M. E. Self-administration of orally-delivered phencyclidine and ethanol under concurrent fixed-ratio schedules in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1987;93(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02439578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carroll M. E., Stotz D. C. Increased phencyclidine self-administration due to food deprivation: interaction with concentration and training conditions. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1984;84(3):299–303. doi: 10.1007/BF00555202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carroll M. E., Stotz D. C., Kliner D. J., Meisch R. A. Self-administration of orally-delivered methohexital in rhesus monkeys with phencyclidine or pentobarbital histories: effects of food deprivation and satiation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Jan;20(1):145–151. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(84)90115-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carroll M. E., Stotz D. C. Oral d-amphetamine and ketamine self-administration by rhesus monkeys: effects of food deprivation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1983 Oct;227(1):28–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Comer S. D., Hunt V. R., Carroll M. E. Effects of concurrent saccharin availability and buprenorphine pretreatment on demand for smoked cocaine base in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994 Jun;115(1-2):15–23. doi: 10.1007/BF02244746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Elsmore T. F., Fletcher G. V., Conrad D. G., Sodetz F. J. Reduction of heroin intake in baboons by an economic constraint. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980 Nov;13(5):729–731. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(80)90018-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Falk J. L., Ma F., Lau C. E. Chronic oral cocaine self-administration: pharmacokinetics and effects on spontaneous and discriminative motor functions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991 Apr;257(1):457–465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Falk J. L., Siris A., Lau C. E. Conditions sufficient for the production of oral cocaine or lidocaine self-administration in preference to water. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996 Mar;40(3):241–247. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(96)01220-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Falk J.L., Lau C.E. Oral cocaine as a reinforcer: acquisition conditions and importance of stimulus control. Behav Pharmacol. 1993 Dec;4(6):597–609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Foltin R. W. Economic analysis of the effects of caloric alternatives and reinforcer magnitude on "demand" for food in baboons. Appetite. 1992 Dec;19(3):255–271. doi: 10.1016/0195-6663(92)90166-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Foltin R. W. Ethanol and food pellet self-administration by baboons. Alcohol. 1998 Oct;16(3):183–188. doi: 10.1016/s0741-8329(97)00171-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Foltin R. W., Fischman M. W., Nautiyal C. The effects of cocaine on food intake of baboons before, during, and after a period of repeated desipramine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Aug;36(4):869–874. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90092-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Foltin R. W. Food and amphetamine self-administration by baboons: effects of alternatives. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):47–66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Green Leonard, Freed Debra E. The substitutability of reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):141–158. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meisch R. A., Bell S. M., Lemaire G. A. Orally self-administered cocaine in rhesus monkeys: transition from negative or neutral behavioral effects to positive reinforcing effects. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993 Apr;32(2):143–158. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(93)80007-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Meisch R. A., George F. R., Lemaire G. A. Orally delivered cocaine as a reinforcer for rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Jan;35(1):245–249. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90233-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Meisch R. A., Thompson T. Ethanol as a reinforcer: effects of fixed-ratio size and food deprivation. Psychopharmacologia. 1973 Jan 1;28(2):171–183. doi: 10.1007/BF00421402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Petry N. M., Heyman G. M. Behavioral economics of concurrent ethanol-sucrose and sucrose reinforcement in the rat: effects of altering variable-ratio requirements. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):331–359. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Samson H. H., Roehrs T. A., Tolliver G. A. Ethanol reinforced responding in the rat: a concurrent analysis using sucrose as the alternate choice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1982 Aug;17(2):333–339. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(82)90088-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Samson H. H., Tolliver G. A., Roehrs T. A. Ethanol reinforced responding in the rat: relation of ethanol introduction to later ethanol responding. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1983 Jun;18(6):895–900. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(83)80012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shurtleff D., Warren-Boulton F. R., Silberberg A. Income and choice between different goods. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):263–275. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tang M., Falk J. L. Oral self-administration of cocaine: chronic excessive intake by schedule induction. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1987 Dec;28(4):517–519. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90515-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES