Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1999 Nov;72(3):407–423. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-407

Satiation, capacity, and within-session responding.

T B DeMarse 1, P R Killeen 1, D Baker 1
PMCID: PMC1284745  PMID: 10605104

Abstract

Responding may change substantially over the course of a session (McSweeney, Hinson, & Cannon, 1996). The role of satiation in this effect was investigated in three experiments. Experiment 1 showed that the capacity of pigeons to consume milo over a 1-hr period was relatively stable across three different methods of measurement. In Experiment 2, pigeons were divided into two groups that differed in their capacity based on one of those measures. Key pecking was then reinforced under a variable-interval 30-s schedule with hopper durations of 2 or 5 s. According to the satiation hypothesis, subjects with small capacities should satiate faster and therefore show greater decreases in food-reinforced responding than would subjects with larger capacities. The results confirmed this prediction and showed that the magnitudes of within-session decreases were better predicted by the amount an animal consumed relative to its capacity than by absolute amount alone. In Experiment 3, each pigeon was prefed 0, 5, 15, or 25 g of milo prior to each session. Consistent with the satiation hypothesis, increases in prefeeding produced lower overall response rates in the smaller capacity subjects than in the larger capacity subjects at each level of prefeeding. These experiments demonstrate the importance of a new variable in the control of behavior, and provide a recommended technique for its measurement.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (270.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bizo L. A., Bogdanov S. V., Killeen P. R. Satiation causes within-session decreases in instrumental responding. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Oct;24(4):439–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Killeen P. R. Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):405–431. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McSweeney F. K., Roll J. M., Weatherly J. N. Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jul;62(1):109–132. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McSweeney F., Swindell S., Weatherly J. Within-session Changes In Responding During Autoshaping And Automaintenance Procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):51–61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Neuringer A. J. Animals respond for food in the presence of free food. Science. 1969 Oct 17;166(3903):399–401. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3903.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES