Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2000 Mar;73(2):225–239. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-225

Varying wheel-running reinforcer duration within a session: effect on the revolution-postreinforcement pause relation.

T W Belke 1
PMCID: PMC1284773  PMID: 10784011

Abstract

Previous investigations of wheel-running reinforcement that manipulated reinforcer duration across conditions showed a strong relation between wheel-running rate and average postreinforcement pause (PRP) duration. To determine if the basis of this relation across conditions was a local effect of fatigue or satiation, the correlation between revolutions run and the duration of the immediately following PRP was investigated under conditions in which reinforcer duration was either constant or variable within a session. Seven male Wistar rats pressed a lever on a fixed-interval 60-s reinforcement schedule with the opportunity to run for 60 s as the reinforcing consequence. In the constant-duration condition, the duration of the reinforcer was always 60 s. In the variable-duration condition, the duration of the reinforcer varied between 2 and 240 s with a mean of 60 s. Mean correlations between revolutions run and the next PRP duration for constant, variable, and constant conditions were -.07, .20, and -.07, respectively. Although the positive correlation in the variable-duration condition is consistent with an effect of momentary fatigue or satiation, little of the variance in PRP duration appears to be attributable to these factors.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (280.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Belke T. W. Running and responding reinforced by the opportunity to run: effect of reinforcer duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):337–351. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Belke T., Dunbar M. Effects Of Fixed-interval Schedule And Reinforcer Duration On Responding Reinforced By The Opportunity To Run. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jul;70(1):69–78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lowe C. F., Davey G. C., Harzem P. Effects of reinforcement magnitude on interval and ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Nov;22(3):553–560. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Staddon J. E. Effect of reinforcement duration on fixed-interval responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jan;13(1):9–11. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES