Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2000 May;73(3):261–274. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-261

Stimulus control and generalization of point-loss punishment with humans.

J O'Donnell 1, J Crosbie 1, D C Williams 1, K J Saunders 1
PMCID: PMC1284776  PMID: 10866351

Abstract

Two experiments demonstrated stimulus control and generalization of conditioned punishment with humans. In both studies, responses first were reinforced with points exchangeable for money on a variable-interval schedule in the presence of one line length (S(D)). Next, a second line length was introduced, and point loss followed every response in the presence of that line (S(D)p). In the final training condition, points were deducted at session end. Response rate was lower in the presence of the S(D)p despite equal rates of points for money in the presence of both stimuli. In generalization testing for Experiment 1, the two lines were included in a 10-line continuum; S(D)p fell in the middle and the trained SD was at one end. Lines were presented randomly, and point delivery and loss contingencies were as in training but with points available in the presence of all lines. For all subjects, response rates were lowest around S(D)p and increased towards the SD end of the continuum. Because testing included only one or two lines beyond S(D), this pattern did not rule out S(D) generalization. Thus, in Experiment 2, stimuli beyond S(D) were added to generalization tests. Response rates did not decrease as a function of distance from S(D), clarifying the demonstration of punishment generalization.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (198.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AZRIN N. H. Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Apr;3:123–142. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baron A. Postdiscrimination gradients of human subjects on a tone continuum. J Exp Psychol. 1973 Dec;101(2):337–342. doi: 10.1037/h0035206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birnbrauer J. S. Generalization of punishment effects-a case study. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Fall;1(3):201–211. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Branch M. N., Nicholson G., Dworkin S. I. Punishment-specific effects of pentobarbital: dependency on the type of punisher. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Nov;28(3):285–293. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crosbie J. The effects of response cost and response restriction on a multiple-response repertoire with humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):173–192. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crosbie J., Williams A., Lattal K., Anderson M. Schedule interactions involving punishment with pigeons and humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):161–175. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOFFMAN H. S., FLESHLER M. STIMULUS ASPECTS OF AVERSIVE CONTROLS: THE EFFECTS OF RESPONSE CONTINGENT SHOCK. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Mar;8:89–96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HONIG W. K., SLIVKA R. M. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF THE EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:21–25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hebert J. A. Context effects in the generalization of a successive discrimination in human subjects. Can J Psychol. 1970 Aug;24(4):271–275. doi: 10.1037/h0082863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Helson H., Avant L. L. Stimulus generalization as a function of contextual stimuli. J Exp Psychol. 1967 Apr;73(4):565–567. doi: 10.1037/h0024319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Honig W. K. The role of discrimination training in the generalization of punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):377–384. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Honig W. K., Urcuioli P. J. The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):405–445. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hébert J. A., Bullock M., Levitt L., Woodward K. G., McGuirk F. D. Context and frequency effects in the generalization of a human voluntary response. J Exp Psychol. 1974 Mar;102(3):456–462. doi: 10.1037/h0035877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jenkins H. M. Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning. Psychol Bull. 1965 Nov;64(5):365–376. doi: 10.1037/h0022537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnston J. M. Punishment of human behavior. Am Psychol. 1972 Nov;27(11):1033–1054. doi: 10.1037/h0033887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. LINDSLEY O. R. Operant conditioning methods applied to research in chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatr Res Rep Am Psychiatr Assoc. 1956 Jun;5:118-39; discussion, 140-53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lovaas O. I., Simmons J. Q. Manipulation of self-destruction in three retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Fall;2(3):143–157. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Matthews B. A., Shimoff E., Catania A. C., Sagvolden T. Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):453–467. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McMillan D. E. A comparison of the punishing effects of response-produced shock and response-produced time out. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):439–449. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Newlin R. J., Rodgers J. P., Thomas D. R. Two determinants of the peak shift in human voluntary stimulus generalization. Percept Psychophys. 1979 Jun;25(6):478–486. doi: 10.3758/bf03213826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Risley T. R. The effects and side effects of punishing the autistic behaviors of a deviant child. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):21–34. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. THOMAS D. R., BISTEY G. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AS A FUNCTION OF THE NUMBER AND RANGE OF GENERALIZATION TEST STIMULI. J Exp Psychol. 1964 Dec;68:599–602. doi: 10.1037/h0044607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. THOMAS D. R., JONES C. G. Stimulus generalization as a function of the frame of reference. J Exp Psychol. 1962 Jul;64:77–80. doi: 10.1037/h0043304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thomas D. R., Lusky M., Morrison S. A comparison of generalization functions and frame of reference effects in different training paradigms. Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):529–540. doi: 10.3758/bf03211650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Thomas D. R., Mood K., Morrison S., Wiertelak E. Peak shift revisited: a test of alternative interpretations. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1991 Apr;17(2):130–140. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.17.2.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Thomas D. R., Windell B. T., Williams J. L., White K. G. Stimulus presentation frequency in brightness discrimination and generalization: a test of adaptation-level and signal-detection interpretations. Percept Psychophys. 1985 Mar;37(3):243–248. doi: 10.3758/bf03207571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolf M., Risley T., Johnston M., Harris F., Allen E. Application of operant conditioning procedures to the behavior problems of an autistic child: a follow-up and extension. Behav Res Ther. 1967 May;5(2):103–111. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(67)90004-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES