Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2000 May;73(3):319–331. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-319

Studies of wheel-running reinforcement: parameters of Herrnstein's (1970) response-strength equation vary with schedule order.

T W Belke 1
PMCID: PMC1284780  PMID: 10866355

Abstract

Six male Wistar rats were exposed to different orders of reinforcement schedules to investigate if estimates from Herrnstein's (1970) single-operant matching law equation would vary systematically with schedule order. Reinforcement schedules were arranged in orders of increasing and decreasing reinforcement rate. Subsequently, all rats were exposed to a single reinforcement schedule within a session to determine within-session changes in responding. For each condition, the operant was lever pressing and the reinforcing consequence was the opportunity to run for 15 s. Estimates of k and R(O) were higher when reinforcement schedules were arranged in order of increasing reinforcement rate. Within a session on a single reinforcement schedule, response rates increased between the beginning and the end of a session. A positive correlation between the difference in parameters between schedule orders and the difference in response rates within a session suggests that the within-session change in response rates may be related to the difference in the asymptotes. These results call into question the validity of parameter estimates from Herrnstein's (1970) equation when reinforcer efficacy changes within a session.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (182.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Belke T. W. Running and responding reinforced by the opportunity to run: effect of reinforcer duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):337–351. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McSweeney F. K., Hinson J. M. Patterns of responding within sessions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):19–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McSweeney F. K., Roll J. M. Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):621–640. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McSweeney F. K., Roll J. M., Weatherly J. N. Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jul;62(1):109–132. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McSweeney F. K., Weatherly J. N., Swindell S. Within-session response rates when reinforcement rate is changed within each session. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Sep;64(2):237–246. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WILKINSON G. N. Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. Biochem J. 1961 Aug;80:324–332. doi: 10.1042/bj0800324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES