Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2000 Jul;74(1):25–54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-25

Shifts in the psychometric function and their implications for models of timing.

A Machado 1, P Guilhardi 1
PMCID: PMC1284783  PMID: 10966095

Abstract

This study examined how two models of timing, scalar expectancy theory (SET) and learning to time (LeT), conceptualize the learning process in temporal tasks, and then reports two experiments to test these conceptualizations. Pigeons responded on a two-alternative free-operant psychophysical procedure in which responses on the left key were reinforceable during the first two, but not the last two, quarters of a 60-s trial, and responses on the right key were reinforceable during the last two, but not the first two, quarters of the trial. In Experiment 1 three groups of birds experienced a difference in reinforcement rates between the two keys only at the end segments of the trial (i.e., between the first and fourth quarters), only around the middle segments of the trial (i.e., between the second and third quarters), or in both end and middle segments. In Condition 1 the difference in reinforcement rate favored the left key; in Condition 2 it favored the right key. When the reinforcement rates differed in the end segments of the trial, the psychometric function--the proportion of right responses across the trial--did not shift across conditions; when it occurred around the middle of the trial or in both end and middle segments, the psychometric function shifted across conditions. Experiment 2 showed that the psychometric function shifts even when the overall reinforcement rate for the two keys is equal, provided the rates differ around the middle of the trial. This pattern of shifts of the psychometric function is inconsistent with SET. In contrast, LeT provided a good quantitative fit to the data.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (551.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bizo L. A., White K. G. Biasing the pacemaker in the behavioral theory of timing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Sep;64(2):225–235. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bizo L. A., White K. G. The behavioral theory of timing: Reinforcer rate determines pacemaker rate. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):19–33. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Church R. M., Deluty M. Z. Bisection of temporal intervals. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1977 Jul;3(3):216–228. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.3.3.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Church R. M. Quantitative models of animal learning and cognition. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Oct;23(4):379–389. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.23.4.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Findley J. D. Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):123–144. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Killeen P. R., Fetterman J. G. A behavioral theory of timing. Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):274–295. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leak T. M., Gibbon J. Simultaneous timing of multiple intervals: implications of the scalar property. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Jan;21(1):3–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Machado A. Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior. Psychol Rev. 1997 Apr;104(2):241–265. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meck W. H. Selective adjustment of the speed of internal clock and memory processes. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Apr;9(2):171–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Staddon J. E., Higa J. J. Time and memory: towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Mar;71(2):215–251. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stubbs A. The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):223–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stubbs D. A. Temporal discrimination and a free-operant psychophysical procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Mar;33(2):167–185. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES