Abstract
Where do equivalence relations come from? One possible answer is that they arise directly from the reinforcement contingency. That is to say, a reinforcement contingency produces two types of outcome: (a) 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, or n-term units of analysis that are known, respectively, as operant reinforcement, simple discrimination, conditional discrimination, second-order conditional discrimination, and so on; and (b) equivalence relations that consist of ordered pairs of all positive elements that participate in the contingency. This conception of the origin of equivalence relations leads to a number of new and verifiable ways of conceptualizing equivalence relations and, more generally, the stimulus control of operant behavior. The theory is also capable of experimental disproof.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (316.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Carrigan P. F., Sidman M. Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):183–204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Devany J. M., Hayes S. C., Nelson R. O. Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):243–257. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dube W. V., McIlvane W. J., Mackay H. A., Stoddard L. T. Stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Mar;47(2):159–175. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dube W. V., McIlvane W. J., Maguire R. W., Mackay H. A., Stoddard L. T. Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):65–76. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green G. Differences in development of visual and auditory-visual equivalence relations. Am J Ment Retard. 1990 Nov;95(3):260–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison R. J., Green G. Development of conditional and equivalence relations without differential consequences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):225–237. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horne P. J., Lowe C. F. On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185–241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson C., Sidman M. Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: Control by negative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):333–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly S., Green G., Sidman M. Visual identity matching and auditory-visual matching: a procedural note. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Summer;31(2):237–243. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowenkron B. Coding responses and the generalization of matching to sample in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jul;42(1):1–18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowenkron B. Instructional control of generalized relational matching to sample in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):293–309. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manabe K., Kawashima T., Staddon J. E. Differential vocalization in budgerigars: towards an experimental analysis of naming. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Jan;63(1):111–126. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders K. J., Williams D. C. Do parakeets exhibit derived stimulus control? Some thoughts on experimental control procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):321–324. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders R. R., Green G. A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):117–137. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schusterman RJ, Kastak D. Functional equivalence in a California sea lion: relevance to animal social and communicative interactions. Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1087–1095. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. Equivalence relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):258–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Rauzin R., Lazar R., Cunningham S., Tailby W., Carrigan P. A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Wynne C. K., Maguire R. W., Barnes T. Functional classes and equivalence relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):261–274. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Rose J. C., McIlvane W. J., Dube W. V., Galpin V. C., Stoddard L. T. Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jul;50(1):1–20. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]