Abstract
The gut microbiome is crucial in regulating overall physiology and communicates with the host through various microbial-derived metabolites, including secondary bile acids (BAs). However, mechanisms underlying the gut microbiome-BA crosstalk (gMxB) are still poorly understood. Here, we assess the postprandial cecal microbiome, BA levels, and colon transcriptome of male BXD mice fed with a chow or high-fat diet, and find that genetic and dietary factors shift microbiome composition and affect gMxB. Four diet-dependent co-mapping genetic loci associated with gMxB, including the interaction between Turicibacter sanguinis - plasma cholic acid, are identified using systems genetics approaches. By integrating human MiBioGen database, we prioritize PTGR1 and PTPRD as candidate genes potentially regulating identified gMxB. The human relevance of these candidates on metabolic health is investigated using data from the UK biobank, FinnGen, and million veteran program databases. Overall, this study illustrates potential modulators regulating gMxB and provides insights into gut microbiome-host communication.
Subject terms: Systems biology, Computational biology and bioinformatics, Microbial genetics
The authors show that genetic and dietary factors reshape the microbiome and influence gut microbiome–bile acid crosstalk. They also identify potential modulators and offer insights into microbiome–host communication.
Introduction
In the last decade, the gastrointestinal tract has been increasingly recognized as a complex signaling organ communicating with multiple tissues, including the brain and other metabolic organs1,2. Increasing evidence indicates that the dysregulation of the gut microbiome-host communication network contributes to the development of obesity and its co-morbidities (e.g., type 2 diabetes)3,4 through various microbially-derived metabolites, including secondary bile acids (BAs)5. BAs are a class of structurally diverse cholesterol derivatives. In addition to their role as digestive surfactants, they also function as versatile signaling molecules mediating adaptive responses to nutritional cues6. Primary BAs are produced in the liver, conjugated with the amino acids glycine or taurine, stored in the gallbladder, and secreted into the intestine after food intake to facilitate the absorption of lipids and lipid-soluble vitamins of dietary origin7. In the intestine, the gut microbiome can deconjugate primary BAs, and then metabolize them to secondary BAs through dehydroxylation, dehydrogenation and epimerization5. In turn, BAs modulate the gut microbiome composition by exerting bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects on luminal bacteria through their detergent action or indirectly through activation of BA receptors5.
The interdependence between the gut microbiome and BAs, hereafter termed as the gut microbiome-BA crosstalk (gMxB), can be influenced by both genetic and environmental factors8,9, and plays important roles in host metabolic homeostasis6,10,11. In mice, chronic fat intake is known to reduce the complexity of the microbiome12,13, comparable to what is observed in human subjects with obesity14,15. The microbiome is capable of transmitting metabolic changes of obesity, as transfer of gut microbiome from overweight mice increases weight gain in gnotobiotic animals16,17. Chronic high-fat diet (HFD) feeding can also shift the BA composition in different tissues9,18,19. Modulation of BA composition, like decreasing the proportion of non-12-hydroxylated (non-12-OH) BAs, also contributes to the susceptibility to obesity20,21. Changes in gMxB can thus have crucial effects on host physiology and metabolic health22,23. Despite these important observations, mechanisms underlying the crosstalk between gut microbiome and host metabolism as well as the role of BAs in this interaction, remain poorly understood. Revealing the effects of genetic, environment (e.g., diet), and gene-by-environment interaction (GxE) on gMxB is critical for understanding intestinal and whole-body homeostasis.
Studying GxE effects in humans is challenging because of the heterogeneities in diet and lifestyle. This can be complemented using mouse models, allowing to control several environmental factors such as temperature and diet, that impact gut physiology, microbiome homeostasis and metabolic responses9,24,25. Additionally, mouse studies allow to systematic access to deep organs, to elucidate tissue-specific mechanisms24,25. However, the characterization of the microbiome, BAs and their interaction in mice has been generally restricted to animals on a single genetic background25. Since host genetic diversity is an important determinant of the gut microbiome26–29, experiments on a single genetic background model limit their ability to model the factors that govern the gut microbiome in human populations. Mouse genetic reference populations (GRPs) mimicking the genetic heterogeneity of human populations are used to study complex traits using systems genetics approaches24,25. For example, quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping was used to investigate the genetic effects on the gut microbiome in the BXD GRP27,30 (derived from a cross between the C57BL/6J and DBA/2J strains) in a fasted state. In addition, we previously designed a study in fed BXD strains that allowed to investigate how genetics and diet impact BA homeostasis9. In this study, we profiled postprandial BA levels in feces, liver, and plasma, and found a number of host genetic and dietary factors affecting BA homeostasis, but did not address the interaction between gut microbiome and BA levels9.
In this follow-up study, we characterized the cecal microbiome using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and analyzed the microarray-based host transcriptome of the proximal colon from 32 BXD strains fed with a chow diet (CD) or HFD (~5 male mice per strain and diet). By integrating these new cecal microbiome profiles with BA data profiled on the same mice in our previous study9, we show that the effects of HFD on gut microbiome are strain-specific and that gut microbiome-host physiology crosstalk is diet-dependent. This forms the foundation of our analysis, which characterizes the genetic and dietary factors influencing these interactions. Multi-omics datasets were also integrated using systems genetics approaches, identifying four diet-dependent genetic loci that are associated with distinct gMxB, including established (e.g., Turicibacter sanguinis (T. sanguinis) - plasma cholic acid (CA)) and unknown gMxB interactions (e.g., Bacteroides uniformis (B. uniformis) - fecal taurolithocholic acid (TLCA)). Candidate genes in these loci were shortlisted using systems genetics prioritization in BXD mice and further prioritized using human gut microbiome genetic associations and putative causal effects inferred using Mendelian randomization (MR). These analyses led to the identification of two candidate genes regulating gMxB – PTPRD and PTGR1. Taken together, our findings provide insights into the understanding of gut microbiome-BA associations and their potential effects on metabolic health.
Results
The microbiome composition is determined by GxE interactions in BXDs
In this study, we leveraged a male BXD mouse panel of 32 strains fed with a CD or HFD from 8 to 29 weeks of age to explore the genetic and dietary determinants of the gMxB. As described previously9, BAs were profiled in plasma (20 weeks), feces (24 weeks), and liver (29 weeks). Plasma samples were collected before (T0), and 30 (T30) or 60 minutes (T60) after controlled test meal gavage feeding. These mice were euthanized in a controlled postprandial state (Methods) and multiple organs were collected for investigation (Fig. 1a). As expected, HFD feeding significantly increased the body weight of the mice and decreased cecum weight (Fig. 1b). To elucidate the dietary effects on the gut microbiome, we first performed principal coordinate analysis and found that mouse cecal microbiome profiles were significantly separated by diet (Fig. 1c), suggesting that 21 weeks of HFD feeding shifted the cecal microbiome composition in BXD mice. In line with previous studies31,32, the alpha diversity—a measure of the microbial diversity within an ecological community—was significantly decreased upon HFD, whether we consider the richness (the number of observed bacteria within a sample), evenness (the distribution of bacteria within a sample), or Shannon index (the bacteria diversity within a sample considering both richness and evenness) (Fig. 1d). Most identified bacteria belonged to eight phyla, among which Firmicutes (also known as Bacillota) was the most abundant, followed by Bacteroidota (also known as Bacteroidetes), in both CD and HFD (Fig. 1e).
Fig. 1. Effects of HFD feeding on the composition of the cecal microbiome in the BXD mouse genetic reference population.
a Schematic of the experimental pipeline of the postprandial BXD study9. Plasma and fecal samples were collected at 20 and 24 weeks of age, respectively, for bile acid (BA) measurements. At 29 weeks, the mice were euthanized, and the liver, colon, and cecum were harvested for BA analysis, transcriptome profiling, and microbiome analysis, respectively. Icons are created in BioRender. Perino, A. (2025) https://BioRender.com/xdy313m. b Boxplots showing the body weight gained from 8 to 29 weeks of age (N = 130 [CD] and 129 [HFD]), and cecum weight (N = 132 [CD] and 135 [HFD]) measured at the end of the study. Chow diet: CD, high-fat diet: HFD. P values were calculated by two-tailed Student’s t-test. c Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of cecal microbiome profiles based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity under CD and HFD. P value was calculated by permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) performed with 9999 permutations. d Boxplots of richness, evenness and Shannon index of BXD gut microbiome in CD (N = 144) and HFD (N = 151). P values were calculated by two-tailed Student’s t-test. e Relative abundance of the indicated bacteria phyla across strains and diets. Phyla were indicated by color and the three most enriched phyla in cecum were indicated in bold. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Changes in gut microbiome in response to HFD were strain-specific (Fig. 1e). Specifically, the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidota (F/B ratio) was significantly changed upon HFD in two parental strains, increasing in the C57BL/6J31,33, but decreasing in the DBA/2J. As expected, the change in the F/B ratio upon HFD varied in the BXD strains due to their distinct genetic backgrounds inherited from the two parental strains (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Fig. 1a). Similarly, the Shannon index was significantly decreased upon HFD in most BXD strains, but not all (e.g., BXD6 and BXD11) (Supplementary Fig. 1b). We also found that the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity between individuals of a given strain was significantly smaller than that between strains (tested within each diet separately) (Supplementary Fig. 1c), suggesting the profound genetic effects on microbiome composition. Overall, these results illustrated not only the HFD effects on the gut microbiome, but also highlighted the important roles of genetic background and GxE, enabling us to investigate genetic factors that regulate the gut microbiome diversity in response to dietary challenges.
Effects of HFD feeding on the genus-level cecal microbiome and colon transcriptome
To further investigate changes in bacterial abundance upon HFD, we first performed a population-level analysis of composition of microbiomes (ANCOM) at the genus level and identified 15 differentially abundant genera (DAGs) with absolute loge(Fold change) > 1 and q value < 0.05 (Fig. 2a). Among these 15 DAGs, 10 belonged to the Firmicutes phylum. Of note, Lactococcus was the most increased genus upon HFD, while Turicibacter was significantly decreased, and barely detected in HFD. Bifidobacterium is another genus that was significantly decreased upon HFD. The changes of these genera upon HFD were consistent with previous reports31,34,35. We then performed ANCOM for each mouse strain and found that the bacterial changes upon HFD in most, but not all, BXD strains were concordant although heterogeneous in amplitude (Fig. 2b), suggesting the impacts of GxE effects on the gut microbiome composition. For example, the abundance of Anaerotignum was increased upon HFD in BXD8, whereas it was decreased or not detected in the other BXD strains (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2. HFD feeding alters the gut microbiome at the genus level.
a Volcano plot showing the effect of HFD on the abundance of each bacterial genus across all BXD mouse strains. Genera with loge(Fold change) > 1 and q < 0.05, obtained from analysis of composition of microbiomes – ANCOM, were identified as differentially abundant genera (DAGs) and colored by the corresponding phylum. b Heatmap showing a subset of genera that were significantly changed (q < 0.05, ANCOM) upon HFD in both diet-independent view and in most BXD strains (more than 15). q values are indicated as follows: *q < 0.05; **q < 0.01; ***q < 0.001. Missing values in both diets were indicated by gray color. Procrustes analyses indicating the overall association between variation in host colon gene expression and gut microbiome composition under CD (c) and HFD (d) based on the Aitchison’s distance of host gene expression data (response) and Bray-Curtis distance of gut microbiome data (predictor). P: P value were calculated in Procrustes analyses. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
To explore the effect of HFD on host gene expression and its interaction with the microbiome, we first profiled the colon transcriptome and assessed the genes altered upon HFD. While the transcriptomes of HFD- and CD-fed mice did not separate well from each other in the principal component analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2a), we identified similar population-level differentially expressed genes to those reported in another BXD study on HFD-fed mice, though that study analyzed samples collected during the fasted state36. For example, serum amyloid A 1 and 3 (Saa1 and Saa3), which are involved in the inflammatory response37, were up-regulated upon HFD. In contrast, the cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily c, polypeptide 55 (Cyp2c55) that inhibits colon tumorigenesis38, and Carboxylesterase 2 (Ces2a), which is decreased in experimental colitis models39, were down-regulated (Supplementary Fig. 2b). This suggests that the effects of HFD on colon gene expression are robust and remain consistent despite short-term changes in feeding status. We next sought to understand the association between host colon gene expression and the gut microbiome, which is critical to the development of intestinal disorders40, therefore, we investigated the association between transcriptome and microbiome and assessed the impact of dietary challenge on their interaction. We performed Procrustes analysis using paired data in each diet and observed a significant concordance between host gene expression and gut microbiome composition across BXD strains under CD (P = 0.047, Fig. 2c), but not HFD (P = 0.31, Fig. 2d), suggesting that HFD may disrupt the overall host gene-microbiome communication.
Uncovering HFD-specific host gene-gut microbiome associations
Although there is no overall association between host colon gene expression and the gut microbiome under HFD, specific groups of gut bacteria and host genes can still be associated. To uncover the HFD effects on the group-level associations between the colon transcriptome and the gut microbiome, we applied sparse canonical correlation analysis (CCA)41,42, a machine learning-based approach that has been used in multi-omics integration42 (e.g., gene expression and microbiome datasets40). This method identifies subsets of bacteria and host genes (termed components (C)) such that a linear combination of one is maximally correlated with the other (Fig. 3a). To further explore the biological relevance of these associations, we then performed over-representation analysis (ORA) on host genes within each component (Fig. 3a). Among the sparse CCA analysis, only two components were significantly correlated in CD (Fig. 3b), while in HFD, four significantly correlated components were identified (Benjamini–Hochberg (BH)-adjusted P < 0.05) (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 3. Immunoregulatory pathways are specifically associated with HFD-induced changes in the cecal microbiome.
a A pipeline for integrating gut microbiome and host colon gene expression to explore microbiome composition-associated pathways. The gene set-bacterium group associations were identified using sparse canonical correlation analyses (CCA, Benjamini-Hochberg (BH)-adjusted P < 0.05) and enrichment analyses were applied to find bacteria group-associated pathways. Icons are created in BioRender. Perino, A. (2025) https://BioRender.com/wcqza6l. The composition of the bacteria groups within components (e.g., C1 and C7, Benjamini-Hochberg (BH)-adjusted P < 0.05) identified using sparse CCA under CD (b) and HFD (c). The size of triangles indicates the absolute value of sparse CCA coefficients of bacteria. Over- representation analysis (ORA) indicating the host pathways enriched for genes associated with gut bacteria groups identified by sparse CCA under CD (d) and HFD (e). Pathways or defined genesets with a q value less than 0.1 were shown and -Log10(q value) were indicated by as follows: + q < 0.1; *q < 0.05; **q < 0.01; ***q < 0.001. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
The three bacterial species with the highest weights within CD component 1 (C1 (CD)), include Faecalibaculum rodentium (F. rodentium - CCA coefficient: −0.43), Turicibacter sanguinis (T. sanguinis - CCA coefficient: −0.42), and Lactobacillus taiwanensis (L. taiwanensis - CCA coefficient: −0.40) (Fig. 3b). F. rodentium has been shown to modulate cell growth43, and indeed, C1 (CD) was related to genes involved in cell proliferation, mitochondrial function and cellular stress, notably MYC targets, respiratory electron transport, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), and heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) targets (Fig. 3d). Under HFD, bacterial species in the C3 (HFD) were not only significantly related to cell proliferation-and mitochondria-related genes, but also associated with genes involved in immune system, while those in the C7 (HFD) were only suggestively associated with inflammatory responses (Fig. 3e). Of note, some bacteria can interact with distinct bacterial species and host genes under altered dietary conditions, thereby participating in different biological processes40. For example, Bacteroides acidifaciens and L. taiwanensis, are related to genes involved in cell proliferation under CD and inflammation under HFD (Fig. 3d, e). We also found that bacteria groups associated with inflammatory response were only identified in HFD, suggesting that specific bacteria are either a cause or a consequence of host intestinal inflammation upon HFD feeding.
HFD feeding reshapes the associations between gut microbiome and BAs
Emerging evidence has shown that the gut microbiome plays a key role in metabolic homeostasis and its-associated disorders by modulating BA homeostasis18,23,44. The ratio of microbially-derived secondary BAs to host-derived primary BAs provides insights into the gut microbiome’s influence on the BA pool. In CD, a positive correlation was found between the Shannon index and the secondary BA/primary BA ratio in the feces, liver, and plasma (60 minutes after a test meal gavage, T60), and these correlations were lost upon HFD feeding (Fig. 4a). This may be due to HFD-induced reductions in the alpha diversity of gut microbiome31,32 (Fig. 1d), ultimately disrupting microbiome-BA interactions (Fig. 4a). Likewise, we found several diet- and biological compartment-dependent correlations between bacterial species and the secondary BA/primary BA ratio. Specifically, Muribaculum intestinale, Lactobacillus intestinalis, Bifidobacterium globosum and Muribaculum gordoncanteri were only positively correlated with secondary BA/primary BA ratio across all analyzed biological compartments in CD-fed mice (Fig. 4a). Schaedlerella arabinosiphila was found to be positively correlated with the secondary BA/primary BA ratio in feces upon CD and in liver and T60 plasma upon HFD, showing diet-specific correlation patterns (Fig. 4a). Conversely, some bacteria showed consistent positive correlation across both diets, such as Bilophila wadsworthia in plasma (T30) and Vescimonas fastidiosa in plasma (T0 and T60) and liver (Fig. 4a). Notably, Paramuribaculum intestinale displayed an opposite trend, positively correlating with the secondary BA/primary BA ratio in CD but negatively in HFD (Fig. 4a). These findings suggest that these bacterial species are potentially associated with the balance between these functionally distinct BA classes, either regulating them or being influenced by them.
Fig. 4. Diet-dependent associations between the abundance of specific bacterial species and BAs.
a Heatmap showing the Spearman correlation between the ratio of secondary to primary BAs and gut bacterial species. Only bacterial species with significant correlations in at least three biological compartments or time points were shown. -Log10(BH-adjusted P value) is represented by dot size and indicated as follows: * BH-adjusted P < 0.05; ** BH-adjusted P < 0.01; *** BH-adjusted P < 0.001. b Schematic of cecal microbiome-relative abundance of each BA (expressed as a fraction of the total in each biological compartment: BA X /all BAs) correlation pipeline in three biological compartments. BAs were extracted from the plasma, feces, and liver. Lasso regression and Spearman correlation were applied. Icons are created in BioRender. Perino, A. (2025) https://BioRender.com/jyrxtgb. Heatmap of bacterial species-relative abundance of each BA pairs selected by just Lasso regression analysis (indicated with +), by just Spearman correlation analyses (indicated with *, BH-adjusted P value < 0.05), or by both Lasso regression and Spearman correlation analyses (indicated with ++) under CD (c) and HFD (d). Bacterial species significantly associated with at least two BAs were shown. Color indicates the Spearman correlation coefficient. The abbreviations of BA are listed in the supplementary Table 1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
To further explore potential bacterium-BA links, we performed Lasso penalized regression and Spearman correlation analyses on the abundance of each bacterium and the relative abundance of each BA (expressed as a fraction of the total in each biological compartment: BA X /all BAs) (Fig. 4b). We fitted the Lasso penalized regression using the relative abundance of each BA as the response variable and the abundances of gut bacterial species as predictors. 41 and 37 bacterial species-BA associations were identified by stability selection under CD and HFD, respectively (Fig. 4c, d). Only a few associations were conserved across diets identified from Lasso penalized regression or Spearman correlation, including V. fastidiosa with liver glycocholic acid (GCA) and plasma T30 tauro-β-muricholic acid (TβMCA), F. rodentium with plasma T0 ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and Christensenella hongkongensis with plasma T60 THDCA. However, the majority of associations were diet-dependent, suggesting that HFD alters the bacterial species-BA relationships (Fig. 4c, d). Specifically, in CD-fed mice, T. sanguinis exhibited a consistent positive correlation with CA in plasma at all three time points (Fig. 4c). Additional diet-specific associations included M. gordoncarteri, which was positively linked with GCA and THDCA in the livers of CD fed mice (Fig. 4c). In contrast, negative associations under HFD were observed, such as Bacteroides acidifaciens with tauro-alpha-muricholic acid (TαMCA) in the liver and V. fastidiosa with TβMCA in plasma T30 (Fig. 4d). Overall, these findings provide insights into the gut microbiome-BA crosstalk and highlight unexplored potential bacterial species-BA associations that are influenced by dietary conditions.
Dissecting the genetic loci regulating gMxB across diets
In addition to dietary effects, host genetics also play a crucial role in shaping gut microbiome composition and BA profiles9,45. Therefore, we investigated whether certain host genetic loci are related to both layers, potentially pointing to a shared regulatory mechanism. To identify genetic loci associated with bacterial abundance, we performed QTL mapping of the cecal microbiome at both the genus and species level. Under CD, we identified two QTL peaks located on chromosome (Chr) 4, which were related to the abundance of Turicibacter (Supplementary Fig. 3a), and one Bacteroides-related peak located on Chr 7 that was conserved in both diets (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). These three QTL peaks at the genus level (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b) co-localized with QTL peaks for their relative species, T. sanguinis and B. uniformis, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3c, d). Under HFD, we identified two additional QTL peaks for Bacteroides on Chr 7, and one for Intestinimonas on Chr 2 (Supplementary Fig. 3b). We also observed an additional QTL peak for B. uniformis on Chr 7, located near the three Bacteroides QTL peaks, though they did not overlap (Supplementary Fig. 3d).
In parallel, we performed QTL mapping for the absolute concentration and relative abundance (BA X/all BAs) of each BA across biological compartments and time points. By comparing the BA and microbiome QTL peaks (Table 1, Supplementary Table 2), we identified four gMxB QTL peaks that appear to relate to both bacterial genera and their respective species. Specifically, two shared genetic loci on Chr 4 were associated with the abundance of Turicibacter and, more specifically, T. sanguinis, as well as some liver and plasma BAs under CD (95% confidence intervals of these QTLs were overlapped). The first locus (gMxB1 QTL) associated with the CA/all ratio in plasma (T0) and liver as well as CA, Chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), and the Taurocholic acid (TCA)/all ratio in plasma (T0 or T30) (Fig. 5a, b). The second locus (gMxB2 QTL) was only associated with CA relative abundance in the liver (Fig. 5a, b). These findings are consistent with the positive correlation between T. sanguinis abundance and total CA and CDCA in plasma (Fig. 4c). Under HFD, another shared genetic locus (gMxB3 QTL) on Chr 7 was associated with the abundance of B. uniformis and the amount of α-muricholic acid (α-MCA), taurolithocholic acid (TLCA), and UDCA in feces (Fig. 5c, d). A nearby, but not overlapping, locus on Chr 7 (gMxB4 QTL) was associated with Bacteroides and two fecal secondary BAs: 7-keto lithocholic acid (7-keto-LCA) and 7-keto deoxycholic acid (7-keto-DCA)/all ratio (Fig. 5c, d).
Table 1.
Co-mapping QTL peaks across both bacterial abundance and BA profiles under CD and HFD, related to Fig. 5a–d
| QTL | Bacterium | Chr | Pos (Mb) | LOD | Start (Mb) | End (Mb) | Diet | Bile Acids |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gMxB1 | Turicibacter; T. sanguinis | 4 | 62.65 | 4.26 | 46.35 | 68.27 | CD | Plasma: CA, CDCA, CA/all, TCA/all; Liver: CA/all |
| gMxB2 | Turicibacter; T. sanguinis | 4 | 74.25 | 3.77 | 68.27 | 88.04 | CD | Liver: CA/all |
| gMxB3 | B. uniformis | 7 | 46.0 | 3.42 | 40.9 | 46.4 | HFD | Feces: α-MCA, TLCA, UDCA |
| gMxB4 | Bacteroides | 7 | 56.47 | 3.44 | 55.65 | 66.32 | HFD | Feces: 7-keto-LCA, 7-keto-DCA/all |
Chr chromosome, Pos position, LOD logarithm of the odds, start and end regions are in Mbp.
Fig. 5. QTL mapping identifies co-localized QTL peaks for bacteria and specific BA species under CD and HFD.
a Manhattan plot showing the co-localized QTL peaks for cecal microbiome and BA levels (abundance or ratio) under CD. b The overlapped QTL peaks of gut microbiome-BA interaction (gMxB) on chromosome 4 under CD. c Manhattan plot showing the colocalized QTL peaks for cecal microbiome and BA levels (abundance or ratio) under HFD. d The overlapped QTL peaks of gMxB on chromosome 7 under HFD. Dash lines indicate the minimum threshold of QTL mapping for indicated traits. e Dot plot showing the Spearman correlation between gut bacteria and metabolic traits in the BXD panel. The color indicates the correlation coefficient while the -Log10(BH-adjusted P value) is represented by dot size and indicated as follows: + BH-adjusted P value < 0.1, * BH-adjusted P < 0.05; ** BH-adjusted P < 0.01; *** BH-adjusted P < 0.001. BW: body weight. ScWAT: subcutaneous white adipose tissue, and eWAT: epididymal white adipose tissue. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Different studies have demonstrated the roles of gMxB in the development of non-communicable diseases7,22,46, such as metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease47 or colorectal cancer48. To dissect the effects of the identified gMxB on metabolic traits, we first checked the correlation of Turicibacter, Bacteroides, as well as their species T. sanguinis and B. uniformis, with phenotypic traits collected in the BXD postprandial cohort. The abundance of Turicibacter and T. sanguinis was positively correlated with cecum weight (both absolute and relative to body weight (BW)) and BW loss, measured as the difference in BW after an overday fasting at 20 weeks of age (Fig. 5e). Conversely, they were negatively correlated with subcutaneous (ScWAT) and epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) mass under CD (Fig. 5e). In contrast, Bacteroides and B. uniformis abundances were negatively correlated with cecum weight as well as to BW loss under CD. Additionally, Bacteroides and B. uniformis were negatively associated with spleen weight (relative to BW) and B. uniformis showed a positive association with eWAT in HFD (Fig. 5e). These findings are in line with our previous observation that the Turicibacter abundance was higher in CD-fed (lean) mice, whereas Bacteroides was more abundant in HFD-fed (obese) mice (Fig. 2a, b). In addition, the correlations between bacterial abundance and the indicated metabolic traits were diet-specific, with HFD eliminating most of these associations. This further highlights the significant impact of diet on gut microbiome composition and its potential effect on host metabolism.
Prioritizing the potential regulators of gMxB and unveiling their biological roles in humans
To investigate the candidate genes that potentially regulate these gMxB, we first filtered genes under these four gMxB QTLs with known segregating variants in the BXD strains predicted to have moderate/high impact. Then, genes enriched or expressed in the intestine obtained from the human protein atlas49 (https://www.proteinatlas.org/humanproteome/tissue/intestine) were extracted. For the four identified gMxB QTLs, we identified 9, 6, 48, and 1 gene(s), respectively (Fig. 6a, b). To further prioritize these candidate genes, we retrieved suggestive (p < 10−4) and significant (p < 10−8) genetic variant-bacterium associations of human GWAS results from MiBioGen50. We then performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the causal effects of the gene expression of candidates in the human colon on the corresponding bacteria (BH-adjusted P < 0.05) using summary statistics from GTEx51 and MiBioGen50 (Fig. 6a, b). For genes under gMxB1 QTL, MR suggested that the gene expression of prostaglandin reductase 1 (PTGR1) in human sigmoid colon increases fecal Turicibacter abundance (Beta = 0.09 and BH-adjusted P = 0.039, Fig. 6b) with no significant heterogeneity observed (Cochran’s Q test p = 0.8) in the sensitivity analysis. For genes within gMxB2 QTL, we found that genetic variants within protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type D (PTPRD) are suggestively associated with the abundance of Turicibacter in human GWAS analysis (Fig. 6b). However, PTPRD did not have a significant cis-eQTL in human colons, preventing us from exploring the causality of the gene expression of PTPRD (Fig. 6b). In addition to analyzing these genes in the colon (site of primary BA transformation), we also examined their expression in liver (site of primary BA production) datasets52. Notably, the liver expression of these two candidate genes was positively correlated with the genes involved in BA metabolism (Supplementary Fig. 4d, e). Overall, the associations between Turicibacter and these two genes, along with their predicted roles in BA metabolism, highlight Ptgr1 and Ptprd as candidate mediators of the effects of gMxB1 and gMxB2, respectively, under CD (Fig. 6b). Under HFD condition, 19 candidate genes with cis-eQTLs in human colons were identified under the gMxB3 QTL. However, we could not further shortlist them as they did not associate with Bacteroides or B. uniformis in human GWAS and MR analyses. For the gMxB4 QTL, only one gene, gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor subunit beta3 (Gabrb3), met 3 of our selection criteria (Fig. 6b) and could be a potential modulator regulating gMxB4, despite lacking human validation.
Fig. 6. Prioritization of candidate genes associated with gMxB and exploration of their potential roles in metabolic health.
a The filtering criteria for selecting candidate genes under the four co-mapping QTL peaks of gMxB. b The identified candidate genes under the four co-mapping QTL peaks of gMxB. Dot plots showing the metabolic health-related clinical traits that have GWAS hits within/around the three candidate genes in the FinnGen study53 (c) and the Million Veteran Program (MVP)54 (d). BMI: Body Mass Index. Lollipop plots showing the associations between metabolic traits and genetic variants in PTGR1 (e), PTPRD (f), and GABRB3 (g) obtained from GWAS results in the European population of the UKBB based on the whole genome sequence (WGS) data90. Only suggestive (-Log10(P value) > 4, red dashed line) or significant (-Log10(P value) > 8, blue dashed line) genetic variant-phenotype associations are highlighted in green, and the most significant associations were labeled. ASAT: Aspartate aminotransferase. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
To better understand the roles of the three putative BA-microbiome co-regulators, PTGR1, PTPRD, and GABRB3 in humans, we examined their associations with clinical traits and diseases in three populations—the FinnGen study53, the Million Veteran Program (MVP)54, and the UK Biobank (UKBB)55,56. While variants within PTGR1 were suggestively related to colorectal cancer in the FinnGen study (Fig. 6c), genetic variants within PTPRD and GABRB3 genes were associated with several metabolic disorders, such as diabetes, or liver fibrosis, in the FinnGen and MVP studies (Fig. 6c, d). Moreover, genetic variants within these three candidates were suggestively (p < 10-4) associated with several metabolic traits in the UKBB, including cholesterol-related traits and fat mass (Fig. 6e–g and Supplementary Fig. 4a–c). Genetic variants within PTPRD were suggestively associated with heart failure in all three human populations, an effect that may be mediated by T. sanguinis abundance, as well as CA, CDCA, or TCA levels. Of note, T. sanguinis strains have previously been linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, such as serum cholesterol level57. Similarly, administration of CDCA or CA has been shown to reduce plasma triglycerides58, which may explain the effect of the gMxB on CVDs. Overall, these data, together with the co-localized QTL results, suggest that alteration in the BA-gut microbiome crosstalk can potentially influence metabolic or cardiovascular health.
Discussion
BA-microbiome crosstalk is known to play a crucial role in maintaining metabolic homeostasis6,10,11, but the effects of diet, genetics, and their interaction on the gMxB are not fully elucidated. To gain more insight into the gMxB, GWAS have been previously applied to analyze the co-mapping genetic variants associated with both gut microbiome and plasma metabolites, including BAs, in a Japanese population. However, no genetic variants with pleiotropic associations were found59. This may be due to the presence of multiple confounding environmental factors in human populations, combined with the use of non-targeted metabolomics for measuring metabolite profiles. In contrast, the use of targeted BA analyses and controlled environmental factors (such as diet and living temperature) in a diversity outbred (DO) mouse population, allowed the identification of Slc10a2, a sodium/BA cotransporter, as a potential regulator of T. sanguinis-plasma CA interaction under high-fat high-sucrose diet60. However, this study did not investigate the effects of dietary factors and BA profiles in the liver, where primary BA are synthesized. Building on existing knowledge, we utilized a different mouse genetic reference population to evaluate cecal microbiome-BA interactions across two diets and three distinct biological compartments. We captured BA dynamics in enterohepatic circulation and systemic spill-over6,61 in the postprandial state, as feeding serves as the primary trigger for BA release in the intestine and subsequent enterohepatic BA cycling. To better identify genetic, dietary, and GxE effects on the gMxB, we profiled the cecal microbiome and colon transcriptome, and integrated previously analyzed BA data in the plasma, liver, and feces9 in postprandial BXD mice.
In line with previous studies8,9, we found that genetic and dietary factors shape the gut microbiome8 and BA composition9, with genetic background also influencing the response to HFD challenge8,9. Most microbiome-BA interactions identified in this study were diet-dependent, highlighting the profound regulatory effects of dietary changes on gut homeostasis. At the transcriptome level, an interaction between bacterial species and inflammation-related genes was only observed in HFD (C3_HFD and C7_HFD CCA components). Notably, two bacterial species that we identified in C3_HFD or C7_HFD, Bacteroides acidifaciens62 and Lactobacillus taiwanensis63, are known to be associated with gut inflammation-related diseases62,63. Together, these findings suggest that the changes in the interaction between the gut microbiome and the host transcriptome upon HFD may arise because of intestinal inflammation induced by an HFD challenge, as previously reported36,64.
To better understand the genetic and dietary influences on microbiome-BA interactions, we performed QTL mapping of both cecal microbiome and BA profiles, revealing four co-mapping genetic loci associated with gMxB in BXD mice. Under CD, we found a genetic locus associated with both the abundance of T. sanguinis and the plasma CA levels that is in agreement with a previous DO mouse study60. In addition, the design of our study allowed us to also link this bacterium to plasma CDCA and TCA levels, as well liver CA levels. Certain T. sanguinis strains (such as MOL361, 18F6, and GALT-E2) are known to deconjugate TCA and glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) to CA and CDCA, respectively57,60. The deconjugation role of T. sanguinis explained the positive correlation between the abundance of T. sanguinis and the relative amount of CA and CDCA under CD in our study. However, the function of T. sanguinis in transformation from GCDCA to CDCA is most likely less relevant in mice due to the low level of GCDCA that could only be barely detected in the feces in our data. In addition, two gMxB QTLs located on Chr 7 were identified under HFD. One QTL peak was associated with the abundance of Bacteroides and the amount of two fecal secondary BAs: 7-keto-LCA and 7-keto-DCA/All. Another nearby QTL peak was associated with its species, B. uniformis, as well as α-MCA, TLCA, and UDCA levels in feces. Of relevance, B. uniformis significantly influenced α-MCA, UDCA, and 7-keto-LCA colonic levels in a dextran sulfate sodium salt (DSS)-induced colitis mouse model65, a model of chemically-induced intestinal inflammation that partially shares a transcriptomic signature with HFD-induced intestinal changes36. Another isolated strain of Bacteroides, Bacteroides intestinalis AM-1, has also been reported to convert CA and CDCA into 7-keto-DCA and 7-keto-LCA, respectively, through its 7α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (7α-HSDH) activity66. This evidence illustrates the reliability of our systems genetics approaches in identifying the communication between bacteria and BAs.
Furthermore, these identified gMxB have significant implications for host metabolic homeostasis. In particular, the gMxB related to Turicibacter/T. sanguinis are of interest, as CA and CDCA supplementation has been shown to reduce HFD-induced obesity in mice67,68. Turicibacter has previously been found to be negatively correlated with body weight in mice69 and serum triglyceride level was reduced in T. sanguinis-monocolonized mice70. Consistent with these findings, our study links the abundance of these bacteria to lower adipose tissue mass, further supporting their potential role in metabolic regulation. Moreover, the identified potential mediators of the interaction between Turicibacter/T. sanguinis and these BAs, Ptgr1 and Ptprd, can contribute to body composition changes. Ptgr1 encodes the NADPH-dependent alkenal/one oxidoreductase and male Ptgr1 knock-out mice display increased fat mass and decreased lean mass based on data collected by the international mouse phenotyping consortium (IMPC)71 (https://www.mousephenotype.org/data/genes/MGI:1914353). The associations between genetic variants within PTGR1 and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein A levels found in the UKBB further substantiate the potentially important role of PTGR1 in metabolic control. In addition, Ptprd knock-out mice have decreased body weight and fat mass72. Genetic variants within PTPRD were reported to be associated with type 2 diabetes73, which we also observed in the human FinnGen and MVP cohorts. Together, these results suggest that PTGR1 and PTPRD could induce metabolic changes, and that they might do so by affecting the crosstalk between T. sanguinis and CA, CDCA, or TCA in the plasma or liver.
For the gMxB identified under HFD, Gabrb3 was the most likely candidate under the QTL of Bacteroides, which encodes a GABAA receptor subunit, that potentially regulates Bacteroides abundance as well as 7-keto-DCA and 7-keto-LCA fecal levels. GABAA is a receptor of the major inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA and Bacteroides is known to regulate GABA production in the human intestine74. Variants within GABRB3 influence the sensitivity of GABAA75 and dysfunctions in GABA signaling are involved in the development of neurological disorders, and can also affect immune responses and glucose metabolism76. Taken together, these observations from literature suggest that Gabrb3 might potentially affect metabolic changes (and disease) through this bacterium-BA interaction. For the QTL peak of B. uniformis, this bacterium also regulates three non-12-OH BAs, α-MCA, TLCA, and UDCA and the proportion of non-12-OH BAs has been shown to be associated with reduced susceptibility to obesity20,21. This suggests that this gMXB QTL is also potentially involved in metabolic homeostasis by affecting the crosstalk between the three BAs and B. uniformis.
In conclusion, we leveraged the BXD mouse population to uncover the genetic, dietary, and GxE effects on the gMxB and dissected four gMxB QTLs. Among these, we identified three putative gMxB-modulating genes—Ptgr1, Ptprd, and Gabrb3. By integrating human datasets, we further confirmed PTGR1 and PTPRD as potential regulators of gMxB and showed that they may affect metabolic health in humans. These results not only illustrate the effects of BA-gut microbiome interactions on metabolic homeostasis, but also provide insights about the role of host genetics and dietary factors on these interactions.
Limitations of the study
In our study, we found that HFD challenge has significant effects on gut microbiome-BA interaction when compared to CD feeding. While the primary difference between the two diets is fat content, other factors, such as fiber content, may also contribute to the observed effects77 and further play a role in shaping gMxB interactions. Additional research, beyond the scope of the current manuscript, could help clarify the individual contributions of these dietary factors. Our 16S rRNA sequencing approach successfully identified key microbial taxa and a subset of bacterial species that are involved in gMxB interaction. Complementing this approach with metagenomics in future research could provide even greater taxonomic and functional resolution. To correlate the 16S data with the dynamics of postprandial BA cycling and compartmentalization, we leveraged BA data from the same mice, where plasma and fecal BAs were collected at 20 and 24 weeks and liver BAs were profiled at the end of the study. These measurements provide valuable insights into BA metabolism over time. Expanding sampling to include portal blood and additional time points in future studies could further refine the understanding of real-time gut microbiome-BA interactions. Finally, despite the known differences in the composition of the BA pool between mice and humans, the majority of the BAs and bacterial QTLs found in this study is conserved across species, indicating that the uncovered gMxB using 32 BXD strains is sufficient to capture relevant genetic variation. However, incorporating female mice and/or mouse strains from different genetic reference populations as well as experimental validation in future studies could enhance the ability to mirror human genetic heterogeneity and uncover further genetic influences on gMxB, which further strengthens translational relevance to human populations. Despite these limitations, our experimental setup successfully highlighted robust gMxB interactions, partially supported by existing literature, and potentially relevant for the regulation of human metabolism.
Methods
All animal experiments comply with all relevant ethical regulations and they were approved by the Swiss cantonal veterinary authorities of Vaud under the license 2257.2.
Mouse experiments
The BXD strains were obtained from the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (Memphis, TN, USA) and have been maintained at the Center of PhenoGenomics (SV-CPG), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), for more than 20 generations. All mice were housed under 12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 7am), with a temperature of 22 °C ± 1 °C with 30–50% humidity. Approximately 360 male mice from 34 BXD strains and 2 parental strains (C57BL/6 J and DBA/2 J) were included in the postprandial study. Mice were fed for 21 weeks (from 8 weeks old of age) either the Teklad Global 18% Protein Rodent Diet 2018 chow diet (CD – 24% kCal of protein, 18% kCal of fat, 58% kCal of carbohydrate – Envigo, Indianapolis, USA) or the Teklad Custom Diet TD.06414 high-fat diet (HFD – 18.3% kCal of protein, 60.3% kCal of fat, 21.4% kCal of carbohydrate – Envigo, Indianapolis, USA) from 8 weeks of age. Prior to euthanasia, mice were fasted overday and refed with their respective diet for 4 h following their physiological cycle9. Mice were anesthetized by 4.5–5% isoflurane followed by 1–1.5 ml blood collection form the heart. When the heart stops to beat, perfusion was then initiated by injection of 15–25 ml PBS via the left ventricle. When the liver turned pale/yellowish (sign of good perfusion), cervical dislocation was done. Multiple organs were then collected for future analysis. BXD strains used in this study: BXD1, BXD11, BXD12, BXD27, BXD32, BXD34, BXD39, BXD40, BXD43, BXD45, BXD48, BXD48a, BXD49, BXD51, BXD55, BXD6, BXD62, BXD64, BXD66, BXD67, BXD69, BXD73, BXD75, BXD79, BXD8, BXD81, BXD84, BXD87, BXD89, BXD90.
Bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing
Mouse cecal content from 32 BXD strains described above was collected directly following euthanasia and stored at −80 °C. Cecal bacterial community composition was assessed by high-throughput sequencing of the V1-V2 hyper-variable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene as previously described78, following the basic protocol “Bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing for bacterial communities present in intestinal contents of mice” with PCR primers 27 F/338 R. 4–5 samples per strain and per condition were processed in 4 sequencing runs on an Illumina MiSeq platform using Paired End (PE) v2 2×250 chemistry. FASTQ files were demultiplexed using the Illumina-utils python package (version 2.7)79.
Microbiome data analysis
Data analysis was performed using R (v4.2.0). Reads were processed into a table of amplicon sequence variants (ASV) using the dada2 pipeline (R dada2 package version 1.18)80 from FASTQ files. Briefly, reads were filtered and trimmed with parameters truncLen = c(170, 230), maxN = 0, maxEE = c(3, 2), truncQ = 2. A sequencing error model was generated, sequences were dereplicated, ASVs were inferred, paired-end reads were merged, and chimeric sequences were removed. ASVs were assigned a taxonomy at the species level using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) training set (release 19, 10.5281/zenodo.14168771)81 based on exact sequence matching with parameter minBoot = 45. Samples with less than 6,000 sequencing reads (2 samples) were discarded. Alpha diversity of each sample was obtained through vegan R package (version 2.6-4). ASV counts were then normalized using the Phyloseq R package (version 1.38.0)82. Further, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) were performed based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity using vegan R package. Differential abundance analysis was conducted by ANCOMBC R package (version 2.4.0)83.
Transcript profiling and analyses
We collected proximal colons for transcriptome analysis as previously described36. Briefly, we pooled ~5 samples with equal mass from the same strain and the same diet for RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using Directzol (Zymo Research) including the DNase digestion. RNA was amplified using the Ambion® WT Expression Kit (Life Technologies). cDNA was fragmented and labeled using the Affymetrix WT terminal labeling kit following manufacturers protocols. Microarrays were run using the Affymetrix mouse Clariom S Assay (GPL23038). apt-probeset-summarize from the Array Power Tool (APT) suite (v2.11.3) with the gc-sst-rma-sketch standard method were used to preprocess microarray data and resulting expression values were log-transformed. We ignored microarray probes targeting polymorphic regions in the BXD population. For probesets targeting the same transcript, the median value of the probes was considered. Principle component analysis (PCA) was performed by FactoMineR package (version 2.9)84, and differential expression analysis was calculated using limma R package (version 3.50.3)85.
Procrustes analysis
To evaluate the overall relationship between host colon gene regulation and cecal microbiome composition under CD or HFD, we conducted a Procrustes analysis using vegan R package (version 2.6-4). For each condition, we applied Aitchison’s distance to colon transcriptome data and Bray-Curtis distance to gut microbiome data as inputs for the Procrustes analysis86.
Multi-omics datasets integration
We applied sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA)41,42, an established method to integrate gut microbiome and colon transcriptome and obtain the associations between the host gene group and bacteria genera group following the tutorial indicated in the Blekhman lab GitHub (https://github.com/blekhmanlab/host_gene_microbiome_interactions)40. For each diet, only bacteria identified to at least the genus level and bacterial species present in at least 10 mouse strains were included. Then, we performed sparse CCA separately using the PMA R package (version 1.2-2). Over-representation analysis (ORA) was further performed using clusterProfiler R package (version 4.2.2)87 with parameters minGSSize = 10 and maxGSSize = 1500. The Hallmark and Reactome genesets used in the ORA were retrieved through the msigdbr R package (version 7.5.1)88.
The BA profiles in the plasma, feces, and liver were downloaded from Li et al.9 (https://mpdpreview.jax.org/projects/Schoonjans1). Lasso penalized regression was performed separately in each diet using bacterial species as predictors and BAs as responses. This analysis was performed using the glmnet R package (version 4.1-8) following the tutorial also indicated in the same GitHub (https://github.com/blekhmanlab/host_gene_microbiome_interactions)40.
QTL mapping analyses on gut microbiome and BAs
The QTL mapping was performed with R qtl2 package (version 0.36)89 based on the latest version of the BXD genotypes from GeneNetwork (http://files.genenetwork.org/current/GN600/BXD_current_rev050423.geno). Kinship between the 32 BXD strains was evaluated using the leave-one-chromosome-out (LOCO) method. Gut microbiome and BAs were normalized by quantile method (with non-positive values) or Box-Cox transformation (with only positive values). A genome scan was then performed using the scan1 function within each diet and the threshold (p < 0.05) of each QTL mapping was estimated based on permutation tests using the scan1perm function with 10,000 repeats. The significant QTL peaks were calculated by the find_peaks function with parameters: prob = 0.95 and peakdrop = 0.5. Colocalized QTL peaks are identified if the 95% confidence intervals of these QTLs were overlapped.
Human dataset analysis
We assessed to metabolic-related phenotypic traits from the UKBB55,56 under Application Number 48020 and European-ancestry participants (based on the UKBB return dataset 2442) were extracted for further GWAS analysis using REGENIE. Step1 involves the estimation of population structure using genotyping arrays provided by UKBB. Step2 calculated genetic variant-phenotype associations based on the whole exome sequencing (WES) data, using the following covariates: the first 10 genetic principal components, age, sex, age:sex interaction, and Body Mass Index (BMI). The GWAS summary statistic calculated based on UKBB whole genome sequencing (WGS)90 were downloaded from GWAS Catalog91. The summary statistic from the FinnGen53 study were downloaded from https://www.finngen.fi/en/access_results, and those for MVP54 database were accessed through dbGaP under accession phs002453.v1.p1 through AgingX project (ID: 10143). The significant (p < 10−8) or suggestive (p < 10−4) associated phenotypic traits of genetic variants within candidate genes in each human population were further extracted.
Mendelian randomization analysis
Summary statistics-based Mendelian randomization was used to estimate the causal effects of the tissue-specific expression of candidate genes on various outcomes. Significant cis-eQTLs of candidate genes in the sigmoid colon and transverse colon were selected and their effect sizes were obtained from the GTEx Portal51 on 2023-03-28 (v8, https://www.gtexportal.org/home/datasets). GWAS summary statistics for phenotypes of interest, namely the bacterial genera Bacteroides and Turicibacter (based on MiBioGen database) and their species B. uniformis and T. sanguinis, were obtained from the IEU OpenGWAS project50,92, using the ieugwasr package (version 0.1.5). In most cases, the summary statistics of multiple significant cis-eQTLs were also available in the outcome GWAS, enabling their use as instrumental variables (IVs). Because only cis-eQTLs were selected, the IVs present a high level of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between each other and LD pruning would leave very few independent IVs, which would make the effect estimates less robust and liable to change based on which IVs are selected. Instead, we used an existing PCA-based approach93 which combines IVs using LD-based PCA, yielding PC IVs which are independent by construction. The LD structure was estimated based on the genotype files from GTEx and extracted using PLINK v1.90b6.2194. We selected top PC IVs to explain 99% of the genetic variance and used the inverse-variance weighted approach93 to estimate the causal effect. For results where the causal effect estimate was significant, we also performed a sensitivity test with a leave-one-out approach, removing one PC and estimating the causal effects using the remaining PCs. The resulting estimated causal effects were tested for heterogeneity using Cochran’s Q test. The list of IVs is also provided (Supplementary Data 1). In cases where only a single IV was available in both GTEx and the outcome GWAS (or if a single PC was retained), we used the Wald ratio method in TwoSampleMR95.
Because the effect sizes from GTEx51 do not have a direct interpretation or unit, the magnitude of causal effect estimates are not meaningful, however the directionality of the effect remains informative. The scale of these QTL effects remains constant per gene, however, which enables their combination using the above-mentioned PCA-based approach93.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Description Of Additional Supplementary File
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank the Auwerx and Schoonjans lab members for technical assistance and discussions. We acknowledge the help of Maroun Bou Sleiman, Alexis Bachmann, Lorne A. Rose and Jesse F. Ingels for transcript profiling. The work was supported by the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL to K.S. and J.A.) and grants from the Kristian Gerhard Jebsen Foundation (to K.S. and J.A.), the European Research Council (ERC-AdG-787702 to J.A.), the Swiss National Science Foundation (310030-189178 and CRSII5-180317 to K.S. and 31003A-179435 and 310030-214826 to J.A.), and the Global Research Laboratory (GRL) National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF 2017K1A1A2013124 to J.A.). X.L. was supported by the China Scholarship Council (201906050019).
Author contributions
The study was conceived by X.L., A.P., K.S. and J.A.; H.L., A.P. and A.R. performed laboratory experiments. Data analyses were carried out by X.L.; J.S. and G.V.A. helped with the human genetic analysis. X.L., A.P. and J.A. wrote the original manuscript. J.D.M., Q.W., A.J., K.S. and J.A. reviewed and edited the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Xucong Lu, Wenqiang Shen, Antonio Molinaro, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
The colon transcriptome data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code: GSE272489. The cecal 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession code PRJNA1137099 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra?linkname=bioproject_sra_all&from_uid=1137099). The phenotype and bile acid data used in this study are available in the Mouse Phenome Database: https://phenome.jax.org/projects/Schoonjans1. All data supporting the findings described in this manuscript are available in the article and in the Supplementary Information and from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
All analyses were performed using R version 4.4.0, employing the tools and packages described in the Methods section. No original code was developed for this study; all software and packages used are publicly available through Bioconductor and/or GitHub.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Kristina Schoonjans, Email: kristina.schoonjans@epfl.ch.
Johan Auwerx, Email: admin.auwerx@epfl.ch.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-025-67680-x.
References
- 1.Stojanović, O., Miguel-Aliaga, I. & Trajkovski, M. Intestinal plasticity and metabolism as regulators of organismal energy homeostasis. Nat. Metab.4, 1444–1458 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Duca, F. A., Waise, T. M. Z., Peppler, W. T. & Lam, T. K. T. The metabolic impact of small intestinal nutrient sensing. Nat. Commun.12, 903 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aron-Wisnewsky, J., Warmbrunn, M. V., Nieuwdorp, M. & Clément, K. Metabolism and metabolic disorders and the microbiome: the intestinal microbiota associated with obesity, lipid metabolism, and metabolic health-pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies. Gastroenterology160, 573–599 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen, L. et al. Gut microbial co-abundance networks show specificity in inflammatory bowel disease and obesity. Nat. Commun.11, 4018 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Collins, S. L., Stine, J. G., Bisanz, J. E., Okafor, C. D. & Patterson, A. D. Bile acids and the gut microbiota: metabolic interactions and impacts on disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.21, 236–247 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Perino, A. & Schoonjans, K. Metabolic messengers: bile acids. Nat. Metab.4, 416–423 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Perino, A., Demagny, H., Velazquez-Villegas, L. & Schoonjans, K. Molecular physiology of bile acid signaling in health, disease, and aging. Physiol. Rev.101, 683–731 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Qin, Y. et al. Combined effects of host genetics and diet on human gut microbiota and incident disease in a single population cohort. Nat. Genet.54, 134–142 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li, H. et al. Integrative systems analysis identifies genetic and dietary modulators of bile acid homeostasis. Cell Metab.34, 1594–1610.e4 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vos, W. M. de, Tilg, H., Hul, M. V. & Cani, P. D. Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights. Gut71, 1020–1032 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wahlström, A., Sayin, S. I., Marschall, H.-U. & Bäckhed, F. Intestinal crosstalk between bile acids and microbiota and its impact on host metabolism. Cell Metab.24, 41–50 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hildebrandt, M. A. et al. High-fat diet determines the composition of the murine gut microbiome independently of obesity. Gastroenterology137, 1716–1724.e1–2 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sonnenburg, J. L. & Bäckhed, F. Diet-microbiota interactions as moderators of human metabolism. Nature535, 56–64 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature457, 480–484 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ley, R. E., Turnbaugh, P. J., Klein, S. & Gordon, J. I. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature444, 1022–1023 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Turnbaugh, P. J. & Gordon, J. I. The core gut microbiome, energy balance and obesity. J. Physiol.587, 4153–4158 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vijay-Kumar, M. et al. Metabolic syndrome and altered gut microbiota in mice lacking Toll-like receptor 5. Science328, 228–231 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li, M. et al. Gut microbiota-bile acid crosstalk contributes to the rebound weight gain after calorie restriction in mice. Nat. Commun.13, 2060 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Devkota, S. et al. Dietary-fat-induced taurocholic acid promotes pathobiont expansion and colitis in Il10−/− mice. Nature487, 104–108 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wei, M. et al. A dysregulated bile acid-gut microbiota axis contributes to obesity susceptibility. EBioMedicine55, 102766 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Haeusler, R. A., Pratt-Hyatt, M., Welch, C. L., Klaassen, C. D. & Accili, D. Impaired generation of 12-hydroxylated bile acids links hepatic insulin signaling with dyslipidemia. Cell Metab.15, 65–74 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ridlon, J. M. & Gaskins, H. R. Another renaissance for bile acid gastrointestinal microbiology. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.21, 348–364 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xu, H. et al. Gut microbiota-bile acid crosstalk regulates murine lipid metabolism via the intestinal FXR-FGF19 axis in diet-induced humanized dyslipidemia. Microbiome11, 262 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nadeau, J. H. & Auwerx, J. The virtuous cycle of human genetics and mouse models in drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.18, 255–272 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li, H. & Auwerx, J. Mouse systems genetics as a prelude to precision medicine. Trends Genet. TIG36, 259–272 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kurilshikov, A., Wijmenga, C., Fu, J. & Zhernakova, A. Host genetics and gut microbiome: challenges and perspectives. Trends Immunol.38, 633–647 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McKnite, A. M. et al. Murine gut microbiota is defined by host genetics and modulates variation of metabolic traits. PloS One7, e39191 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hall, A. B., Tolonen, A. C. & Xavier, R. J. Human genetic variation and the gut microbiome in disease. Nat. Rev. Genet.18, 690–699 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tierney, B. T. et al. The landscape of genetic content in the gut and oral human microbiome. Cell Host Microbe26, 283–295.e8 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Perez-Munoz, M. E. et al. Diet modulates cecum bacterial diversity and physiological phenotypes across the BXD mouse genetic reference population. PloS One14, e0224100 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bisanz, J. E., Upadhyay, V., Turnbaugh, J. A., Ly, K. & Turnbaugh, P. J. Meta-analysis reveals reproducible gut microbiome alterations in response to a high-fat diet. Cell Host Microbe26, 265–272.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lindskog Jonsson, A. et al. Impact of gut microbiota and diet on the development of atherosclerosis in Apoe−/− Mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.38, 2318–2326 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zheng, R. et al. Gut microbiota and mycobiota change with feeding duration in mice on a high-fat and high-fructose diet. BMC Microbiol.24, 504 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Everard, A. et al. Microbiome of prebiotic-treated mice reveals novel targets involved in host response during obesity. ISME J.8, 2116–2130 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang, J. et al. Modulation of gut microbiota during probiotic-mediated attenuation of metabolic syndrome in high fat diet-fed mice. ISME J.9, 1–15 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li, X. et al. Genetic and dietary modulators of the inflammatory response in the gastrointestinal tract of the BXD mouse genetic reference population. eLife12, RP87569 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ye, R. D. & Sun, L. Emerging functions of serum amyloid A in inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol.98, 923–929 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Albert, M. & Bennett, A. PWE-089 The roles of CYP2C40 and CYP2C55 in preventing colon cancer. Gut61, A333–A333 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chalhoub, G. et al. Carboxylesterase 2 proteins are efficient diglyceride and monoglyceride lipases possibly implicated in metabolic disease. J. Lipid Res.62, 100075 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Priya, S. et al. Identification of shared and disease-specific host gene–microbiome associations across human diseases using multi-omic integration. Nat. Microbiol.7, 780–795 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Witten, D. M., Tibshirani, R. & Hastie, T. A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis. Biostat. Oxf. Engl.10, 515–534 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Witten, D. M. & Tibshirani, R. J. Extensions of sparse canonical correlation analysis with applications to genomic data. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 8, 28 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Zagato, E. et al. Endogenous murine microbiota member Faecalibaculum rodentium and its human homologue protect from intestinal tumour growth. Nat. Microbiol.5, 511–524 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mancin, L., Wu, G. D. & Paoli, A. Gut microbiota–bile acid–skeletal muscle axis. Trends Microbiol.31, 254–269 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nagarajan, A., Scoggin, K., Gupta, J., Threadgill, D. W. & Andrews-Polymenis, H. L. Using the collaborative cross to identify the role of host genetics in defining the murine gut microbiome. Microbiome11, 149 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cai, J., Sun, L. & Gonzalez, F. J. Gut microbiota-derived bile acids in intestinal immunity, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. Cell Host Microbe30, 289–300 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Albillos, A., de Gottardi, A. & Rescigno, M. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: Pathophysiological basis for therapy. J. Hepatol.72, 558–577 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cong, J. et al. Bile acids modified by the intestinal microbiota promote colorectal cancer growth by suppressing CD8+ T cell effector functions. Immunity57, 876–889.e11 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Thul, P. J. & Lindskog, C. The human protein atlas: a spatial map of the human proteome. Protein Sci.27, 233–244 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kurilshikov, A. et al. Large-scale association analyses identify host factors influencing human gut microbiome composition. Nat. Genet.53, 156–165 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.GTEx Consortium. The genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 45, 580–585 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Li, H. et al. Identifying gene function and module connections by the integration of multispecies expression compendia. Genome Res.29, 2034–2045 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kurki, M. I. et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature613, 508–518 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gaziano, J. M. et al. Million Veteran Program: a mega-biobank to study genetic influences on health and disease. J. Clin. Epidemiol.70, 214–223 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Backman, J. D. et al. Exome sequencing and analysis of 454,787 UK Biobank participants. Nature599, 628–634 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature562, 203–209 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lynch, J. B. et al. Gut microbiota Turicibacter strains differentially modify bile acids and host lipids. Nat. Commun.14, 3669 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Porez, G., Prawitt, J., Gross, B. & Staels, B. Bile acid receptors as targets for the treatment of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease: thematic review series: new lipid and lipoprotein targets for the treatment of cardiometabolic diseases. J. Lipid Res.53, 1723–1737 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tomofuji, Y. et al. Analysis of gut microbiome, host genetics, and plasma metabolites reveals gut microbiome-host interactions in the Japanese population. Cell Rep.42, 113324 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kemis, J. H. et al. Genetic determinants of gut microbiota composition and bile acid profiles in mice. PLoS Genet.15, e1008073 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hofmann, A. F. The enterohepatic circulation of bile acids in mammals: form and functions. Front. Biosci. Landmark Ed.14, 2584–2598 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zheng, C. et al. Bacteroides acidifaciens and its derived extracellular vesicles improve DSS-induced colitis. Front. Microbiol.14, 1304232 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Li, X. et al. Complete genome sequencing of Peyer’s patches-derived Lactobacillus taiwanensis CLG01, a potential probiotic with antibacterial and immunomodulatory activity. BMC Microbiol.21, 68 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Enriquez, J. R. et al. A dietary change to a high-fat diet initiates a rapid adaptation of the intestine. Cell Rep.41, 111641 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yan, Y. et al. Bacteroides uniformis-induced perturbations in colonic microbiota and bile acid levels inhibit TH17 differentiation and ameliorate colitis developments. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes9, 1–14 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Fukiya, S. et al. Conversion of cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid into their 7-oxo derivatives by Bacteroides intestinalis AM-1 isolated from human feces. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.293, 263–270 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Watanabe, M. et al. Bile acids induce energy expenditure by promoting intracellular thyroid hormone activation. Nature439, 484–489 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Watanabe, M. et al. Lowering bile acid pool size with a synthetic farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist induces obesity and diabetes through reduced energy expenditure. J. Biol. Chem.286, 26913–26920 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Guo, X. et al. High fat diet alters gut microbiota and the expression of paneth cell-antimicrobial peptides preceding changes of circulating inflammatory cytokines. Mediators Inflamm.2017, 9474896 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Fung, T. C. et al. Intestinal serotonin and fluoxetine exposure modulate bacterial colonization in the gut. Nat. Microbiol.4, 2064–2073 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Groza, T. et al. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: comprehensive knockout phenotyping underpinning the study of human disease. Nucleic Acids Res.51, D1038–D1045 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mishra, I. et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor δ serves as the orexigenic asprosin receptor. Cell Metab.34, 549–563.e8 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Pei, Q. et al. PPAR-γ2 and PTPRD gene polymorphisms influence type 2 diabetes patients’ response to pioglitazone in China. Acta Pharmacol. Sin.34, 255–261 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Strandwitz, P. et al. GABA-modulating bacteria of the human gut microbiota. Nat. Microbiol.4, 396–403 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lin, S. X. N. et al. Correlations of receptor desensitization of gain-of-function GABRB3 variants with clinical severity. Brain J. Neurol.147, 224–239 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hwang, I. et al. GABA-stimulated adipose-derived stem cells suppress subcutaneous adipose inflammation in obesity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA116, 11936–11945 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pellizzon, M. A. & Ricci, M. R. The common use of improper control diets in diet-induced metabolic disease research confounds data interpretation: the fiber factor. Nutr. Metab.15, 3 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Rapin, A., Pattaroni, C., Marsland, B. J. & Harris, N. L. Microbiota analysis using an illumina MiSeq platform to sequence 16S rRNA genes. Curr. Protoc. Mouse Biol.7, 100–129 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Eren, A. M., Vineis, J. H., Morrison, H. G. & Sogin, M. L. A filtering method to generate high quality short reads using illumina paired-end technology. PLOS ONE8, e66643 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods13, 581–583 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Cole, J. R. et al. Ribosomal database project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res.42, D633–D642 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLOS One8, e61217 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lin, H. & Peddada, S. D. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat. Commun.11, 3514 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lê, S., Josse, J. & Husson, F. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw.25, 1–18 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res.43, e47 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Quinn, T. P., Erb, I., Richardson, M. F. & Crowley, T. M. Understanding sequencing data as compositions: an outlook and review. Bioinformatics34, 2870–2878 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS J. Integr. Biol.16, 284–287 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Liberzon, A. et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics27, 1739–1740 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Broman, K. W. et al. R/qtl2: software for mapping quantitative trait loci with high-dimensional data and multiparent populations. Genetics211, 495–502 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Carss, K. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of 490,640 UK Biobank participants. Nature645, 692–701 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sollis, E. et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource. Nucleic Acids Res.51, D977–D985 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Elsworth, B. et al. The MRC IEU OpenGWAS data infrastructure. bioRxiv 2020.08.10.244293v1 (2020).
- 93.Burgess, S., Zuber, V., Valdes-Marquez, E., Sun, B. B. & Hopewell, J. C. Mendelian randomization with fine-mapped genetic data: choosing from large numbers of correlated instrumental variables. Genet. Epidemiol.41, 714–725 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet.81, 559–575 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hemani, G., Tilling, K. & Smith, G. D. Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data. PLOS Genet.13, e1007081 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Description Of Additional Supplementary File
Data Availability Statement
The colon transcriptome data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code: GSE272489. The cecal 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession code PRJNA1137099 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra?linkname=bioproject_sra_all&from_uid=1137099). The phenotype and bile acid data used in this study are available in the Mouse Phenome Database: https://phenome.jax.org/projects/Schoonjans1. All data supporting the findings described in this manuscript are available in the article and in the Supplementary Information and from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
All analyses were performed using R version 4.4.0, employing the tools and packages described in the Methods section. No original code was developed for this study; all software and packages used are publicly available through Bioconductor and/or GitHub.






