Abstract
Four groups of pigeons were trained to perform a delayed matching-to-sample task with a single delay of 0, 2, 4, or 6 s from the outset of training. The longer the training delay, the more sessions were required for all birds to reach the same level of response accuracy. Following initial training, five test sessions that included nonreinforced trials with delay intervals of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 s were interspersed between training sessions. Unlike typical forgetting functions in which accuracy decreases monotonically with increasing delay, the forgetting functions from test sessions resembled generalization gradients with the peak of the functions occurring at the training delay. Following additional training for all birds with a 0-s delay, forgetting functions decreased monotonically with increasing delay. The results suggested that remembering can be trained at a specific delay interval, and generalizes to similar delay intervals. Generalization along the temporal dimension of delay may contribute to typical forgetting functions in which accuracy decreases from 0-s delay.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (230.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BLOUGH D. S. Delayed matching in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Apr;2:151–160. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davison M. C., Tustin R. D. The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):331–336. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fetterman J. G. Dimensions of stimulus complexity. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996 Jan;22(1):3–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GUTTMAN N., KALISH H. I. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Jan;51(1):79–88. doi: 10.1037/h0046219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Honig W. K., Urcuioli P. J. The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):405–445. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones B. M., White K. G. An investigation of the differential-outcomes effect within sessions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):389–406. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones B. M., White K. G. Sample-stimulus discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcement in delayed matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):159–172. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts W. A., Kraemer P. J. Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1982 Oct;8(4):342–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SHEPARD R. N. Stimulus and response generalization: deduction of the generalization gradient from a trace model. Psychol Rev. 1958 Jul;65(4):242–256. doi: 10.1037/h0043083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shepard R. N. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science. 1987 Sep 11;237(4820):1317–1323. doi: 10.1126/science.3629243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White K. G. Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):15–34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White K. G., Wixted J. T. Psychophysics of remembering. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jan;71(1):91–113. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wixted J. T. Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):409–426. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zentall T. R., Sherburne L. M. Role of differential sample responding in the differential outcomes effect involving delayed matching by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1994 Oct;20(4):390–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]