Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2001 Jan;75(1):15–23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-15

Behavioral momentum in computer-presented discriminations in individuals with severe mental retardation.

W W Dube 1, W J McIlvane 1
PMCID: PMC1284805  PMID: 11256864

Abstract

Behavioral momentum was examined in 2 individuals with severe mental retardation via within-subject manipulations of obtained reinforcer rates. Subjects performed self-paced discrimination problems presented on a touch screen computer monitor. Two different problems, Tasks A and B, alternated in blocks of 15 trials on a multiple schedule. Reinforcers were snack foods. The reinforcement schedule for Task A was continuous (fixed-ratio 1) and the schedule for Task B was continuous in some conditions and variable ratio in other conditions. Behavioral momentum was assessed in test sessions by prefeeding, presenting response-independent food, and making available alternatives to the tasks. When the obtained reinforcer rate for Task A was at least twice that for Task B, resistance to change was greater for Task A. When both reinforcer rates and response rates were a pproximately equal for the two tasks, resistance to change was approximately equal. These results are consistent with behavioral momentum effects. They extend previous findings with humans by examining momentum in self-initiated discrete-trial discrimination tasks with ratio schedules, and by isolating relative reinforcer rates as a controlling variable via within-subject manipulations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (180.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dube W. V., McIlvane W. J., Mackay H. A., Stoddard L. T. Stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Mar;47(2):159–175. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dube W. V., Serna R. W. Re-evaluation of a programmed method to teach generalized identity matching to sample. Res Dev Disabil. 1998 Jul-Aug;19(4):347–379. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(98)00009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FERSTER C. B. Positive reinforcement and behavioral deficits of autistic children. Child Dev. 1961 Sep;32:437–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1961.tb05042.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grace R., Nevin J. On the relation between preference and resistance to change. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jan;67(1):43–65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mace F. C. In pursuit of general behavioral relations. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):557–563. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mace F. C., Lalli J. S. Behavioral momentum in college basketball. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Fall;25(3):657–663. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mace F. C., Lalli J. S., Shea M. C., Lalli E. P., West B. J., Roberts M., Nevin J. A. The momentum of human behavior in a natural setting. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):163–172. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McIlvane W. J., Kledaras J. B., Iennaco F. M., McDonald S. J., Stoddard L. T. Some possible limits on errorless discrimination reversals in individuals with severe mental retardation. Am J Ment Retard. 1995 Jan;99(4):430–436. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nevin J. A. An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):301–316. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nevin J. A., Grace R. C. Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Feb;23(1):73–130. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00002405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nevin J. A., Mandell C., Atak J. R. The analysis of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):49–59. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nevin J. A., Tota M. E., Torquato R. D., Shull R. L. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):359–379. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nevin J. The momentum of compliance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):535–547. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Plaud J. J., Gaither G. A. Human behavioral momentum: implications for applied behavior analysis and therapy. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1996 Jun;27(2):139–148. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(96)00018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ray B. A. Selective attention: the effects of combining stimuli which control incompatible behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):539–550. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sidman M. A note on the measurement of conditional discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Mar;33(2):285–289. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stoddard L. T., Sidman M. The removal and restoration of stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):143–154. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES