Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2001 Mar;75(2):111–134. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-111

The principal components of response strength.

P R Killeen 1, S S Hall 1
PMCID: PMC1284811  PMID: 11394483

Abstract

As Skinner (1938) described it, response strength is the "state of the reflex with respect to all its static properties" (p. 15), which include response rate, latency, probability, and persistence. The relations of those measures to one another was analyzed by probabilistically reinforcing, satiating, and extinguishing pigeons' key pecking in a trials paradigm. Reinforcement was scheduled according to variable-interval, variable-ratio, and fixed-interval contingencies. Principal components analysis permitted description in terms of a single latent variable, strength, and this was validated with confirmatory factor analyses. Overall response rate was an excellent predictor of this state variable.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (304.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AMSEL A. Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: some recent history and a theoretical extension. Psychol Rev. 1962 Jul;69:306–328. doi: 10.1037/h0046200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum W. M. The correlation-based law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):137–153. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blough D. S. Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):237–246. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Branch M. N. On the role of "memory" in the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Sep;28(2):171–179. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crites R. J., Harris R. T., Rosenquist H., Thomas D. R. Response patterning during stimulus generalization in the rat. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Mar;10(2):165–168. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisenberger R. Learned industriousness. Psychol Rev. 1992 Apr;99(2):248–267. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Filion R. D., Fowler S. C., Notterman J. M. Psychophysical evaluation of feedback phenomena as related to precision of force emission: some methodological considerations. Am J Psychol. 1969 Jun;82(2):266–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gamzu E. R., Williams D. R. Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Mar;19(2):225–232. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gentry G. D., Weiss B., Laties V. G. The microanalysis of fixed-interval responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):327–343. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HEARST E. Resistance-to-extinction functions in the single organism. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Apr;4:133–144. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HERRICK R. M. Lever displacement during continuous reinforcement and during a discrimination. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1963 Aug;56:700–707. doi: 10.1037/h0045085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kellicutt M. H. Response duration during an operant discrimination. J Exp Psychol. 1967 Jan;73(1):56–60. doi: 10.1037/h0024163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Killeen P. R., Cate H., Tran T. Scaling pigeons' choice of feeds: bigger is better. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):203–217. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Killeen P. R. Incentive theory: IV. Magnitude of reward. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):407–417. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Killeen P. R. The reflex reserve. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):319–331. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LOGAN F. A. A micromolar approach to behavior theory. Psychol Rev. 1956 Jan;63(1):63–73. doi: 10.1037/h0044334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Levine G., Loesch R. Generality of response intensity following nonreinforcement. J Exp Psychol. 1967 Sep;75(1):97–102. doi: 10.1037/h0024916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MARGULIES S. Response duration in operant level, regular reinforcement, and extinction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:317–321. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meyer D. E., Osman A. M., Irwin D. E., Yantis S. Modern mental chronometry. Biol Psychol. 1988 Jun;26(1-3):3–67. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(88)90013-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. NOTTERMAN J. M., BLOCK A. H. Note on response differentiation during a simple discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Oct;3:289–291. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Neuringer A. J. Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):417–424. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nevin J. A. An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):301–316. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nevin J. A., Grace R. C. Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Feb;23(1):73–130. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00002405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nevin J. A., Mandell C., Atak J. R. The analysis of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):49–59. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nevin J. A. Quantitative analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):421–434. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ploog B. O., Zeigler H. P. Effects of food-pellet size on rate, latency, and topography of autoshaped key pecks and gapes in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):21–35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roberts W. A., Kraemer P. J. Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1982 Oct;8(4):342–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Staddon J. E. The conventional wisdom of behavior analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Sep;60(2):439–447. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Svartdal F. Working harder for less: effect of incentive value on force of instrumental response in humans. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 Feb;46(1):11–34. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. WENRICH W. W. Response strength of an operant under stimulus control with satiated subjects. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:247–248. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Westfall R. S. Newton and the fudge factor. Science. 1973 Feb 23;179(4075):751–758. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4075.751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES