Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2001 Sep;76(2):195–215. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-195

Resistance to change of operant variation and repetition.

A H Doughty 1, K A Lattal 1
PMCID: PMC1284834  PMID: 11599639

Abstract

A multiple chained schedule was used to compare the relative resistance to change of variable and fixed four-peck response sequences in pigeons. In one terminal link, a response sequence produced food only if it occurred infrequently relative to 15 other response sequences (vary). In the other terminal link, a single response sequence produced food (repeat). Identical variable-interval schedules operated in the initial links. During baseline, lower response rates generally occurred in the vary initial link, and similar response and reinforcement rates occurred in each terminal link. Resistance of responding to prefeeding and three rates of response-independent food delivered during the intercomponent intervals then was compared between components. During each disruption condition, initial- and terminal-link response rates generally were more resistant in the vary component than in the repeat component. During the response-independent food conditions, terminal-link response rates were more resistant than initial-link response rates in each component, but this did not occur during prefeeding. Variation (in vary) and repetition (in repeat) both decreased during the response-independent food conditions in the respective components, but with relatively greater disruption in repeat. These results extend earlier findings demonstrating that operant variation is more resistant to disruption than is operant repetition and suggest that theories of response strength, such as behavioral momentum theory, must consider factors other than reinforcement rate. The implications of the results for understanding operant response classes are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (257.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANTONITIS J. J. Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Oct;42(4):273–281. doi: 10.1037/h0060407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell M. Pavlovian contingencies and resistance to change in a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):81–96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackman D. Response rate, reinforcement frequency, and conditioned suppression. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Sep;11(5):503–516. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen L., Neuringer A., Rhodes D. Effects of ethanol on reinforced variations and repetitions by rats under a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jul;54(1):1–12. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen S. L. Behavioral momentum: the effects of the temporal separation of rates of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jan;69(1):29–47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grace R., Schwendiman J., Nevin J. Effects of unsignaled delay of reinforcement on preference and resistance to change. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 May;69(3):247–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lattal K., Reilly M., Kohn J. Response persistence under ratio and interval reinforcement schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Sep;70(2):165–183. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MARGULIES S. Response duration in operant level, regular reinforcement, and extinction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:317–321. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MILLER G. A., FRICK F. C. Statistical behavioristics and sequences of responses. Psychol Rev. 1949 Nov;56(6):311–324. doi: 10.1037/h0060413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mace F. C. Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):529–550. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Machado A. Increasing the variability of response sequences in pigeons by adjusting the frequency of switching between two keys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):1–25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McElroy E., Neuringer A. Effects of alcohol on reinforced repetitions and reinforced variations in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1990;102(1):49–55. doi: 10.1007/BF02245743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mellon R. C., Shull R. L. Resistance to change produced by access to fixed-delay versus variable-delay terminal links. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):79–92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morris C. J. The operant conditioning of response variability: Free-operant versus discrete-response procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 May;47(3):273–277. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Neuringer A., Kornell N., Olufs M. Stability and variability in extinction. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Jan;27(1):79–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nevin J. A. An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):301–316. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nevin J. A., Grace R. C. Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Feb;23(1):73–130. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00002405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nevin J. A., Mandell C., Atak J. R. The analysis of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):49–59. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nevin J. A., Randolph, Holland S., McLean A. P. Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jul;76(1):43–74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nevin J. A. Response strength in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):389–408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nevin J. A., Tota M. E., Torquato R. D., Shull R. L. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):359–379. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schaal D. W., Shahan T. A., Kovera C. A., Reilly M. P. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Mar;69(2):103–122. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schoenfeld W. N. On the difference in resistance to extinction following regular and periodic reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):259–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schwartz B. Development of complex, stereotyped behavior in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Mar;33(2):153–166. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schwartz B. Failure to produce response variability with reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Mar;37(2):171–181. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shimp C. P. Organization in memory and behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jul;26(1):113–130. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vogel R., Annau Z. An operant discrimination task allowing variability of reinforced response patterning. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):1–6. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES