The terrein biosynthetic gene cluster of Aspergillus terreus: structure, function, regulation, and similar gene clusters

Abstract

Fungi synthesize a wide variety of secondary metabolites (SMs). The genes of the biosynthetic pathways of many of these compounds are encoded by biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), which typically consist of a core biosynthetic enzyme, tailoring enzymes, transporters, and pathway-specific regulators. One of the well-studied fungal SMs is the polyketide terrein, which is produced by Aspergillus terreus and exhibits a wide range of biological activities, such as cytotoxic, phytotoxic, and antibacterial effects. The structure and function of the terrein BGC, the functions of the encoded proteins, and the processes controlling the transcriptional regulation of the BGC are summarized in this mini review. Both pathway-specific and global regulators and epigenetic regulation are presented. Furthermore, similar BGCs identified in other fungal taxa are introduced in short. Despite significant advances, key aspects of terrein biosynthesis, such as some protein functions, details of the BGC regulation, and SM ecological functions remain unresolved. Filling in these gaps will help us better understand the biology of fungal SMs and could pave the way for biotechnological applications.

1. Introduction

Fungi produce a plethora of secondary metabolites (SMs) (Macheleidt et al., 2016). These are structurally diverse, low-molecular-mass compounds that are not essential for growth under standard conditions (Brakhage, 2013). These metabolites are characterized by a huge functional diversity, such as communication, competition and pathogenicity, among others (Macheleidt et al., 2016).

The genes responsible for the biosynthesis of several SMs are often encoded by secondary metabolic clusters (Rokas et al., 2018), also called biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) (Keller, 2019). These clusters typically follow a common organizational pattern (Rokas et al., 2018). They usually include a core gene encoding an enzyme, such as a nonribosomal peptide synthetase, polyketide synthase (PKS), dimethylallyl tryptophan synthetase or terpene cyclase. The core enzyme produces the precursor, or backbone of the SM(s). In addition, BGCs typically contain genes encoding tailoring enzymes that modify the precursor compound, transporters that facilitate the export of the final metabolite, and a transcription factor that regulates the expression of the cluster genes. These latter genes, however, may be missing from the BGC, and occasionally, hypothetical or enigmatic genes are also present in the cluster (Keller, 2019).

The polyketide terrein (Figure 1), produced by the filamentous fungus Aspergillus terreus (Yin et al., 2016), is among the better studied fungal SMs. Terrein has been shown to have antibacterial, antifungal (Gressler et al., 2015b), anti-inflammatory, antioxidative (Lee et al., 2010), antiproliferative, cytotoxic (Liao et al., 2012) and proapoptotic (Demasi et al., 2010; Porameesanaporn et al., 2013) properties, among others. In addition, it has phytotoxic activity, as it causes lesions on fruit surfaces, and inhibits plant seed germination (Zaehle et al., 2014). Furthermore, it is also used by the fungus as a reductive agent, reducing ferric ions to ferrous iron ions, increasing iron solubility and facilitating iron uptake (Gressler et al., 2015b). These latter may be the most important functions fulfilled in the ecological context in A. terreus (Zaehle et al., 2014; Gressler et al., 2015b).

Figure 1.

(A) The structure of the ter BGC of A. terreus, and similar biosynthetic gene clusters in other organisms. Comparison was made using the clinker (Gilchrist and Chooi, 2021) module of CAGECAT (van den Belt et al., 2023) with 0.3 identity threshold. Color coding refers to predicted functions, and putative homologous genes are connected by stripes. (B) The schematic biosynthetic pathway of terrein and other, related metabolites deriving from 6-hydroxymellein. nrPKS, non-reducing polyketide synthase; MFS, major facilitator superfamily.

The relatively simple chemical structure (Yin et al., 2016), the ability to produce it in high yields (Yao et al., 2022) and the emerging insights into the regulation of its synthesis (see below) make terrein a promising model candidate for studying fungal secondary metabolism. Accordingly, the BGC coding the genes needed for the biosynthesis of terrein (termed ter BGC in the present work (Kahlert et al., 2021b)) may serve as a representative system for investigating the structure and regulation of fungal SM gene clusters.

This mini review aims to summarize current knowledge on the structure and regulation of the terrein biosynthetic gene cluster, and to introduce the similar gene clusters present in other organisms.

2. Structure of the terrein biosynthetic gene cluster

The ter BGC was identified during a search for a non-reducing PKS potentially responsible for the coloration of conidia in A. terreus, which led to the identification of a PKS, encoded by the gene ATEG_00145 (Zaehle et al., 2014). The elimination of the gene did not change the coloration of the conidia; however, metabolic profiling showed that a metabolite, later identified as terrein, was completely absent from the culture broth of the mutant (Zaehle et al., 2014). Based on these results, the PKS encoded by the gene ATEG_00145 (or terA) was denoted TerA, referring to the SM terrein (Zaehle et al., 2014).

Starting from the terA locus, upstream and downstream neighboring genes were investigated whether they were coexpressed with terA. Eleven genes from ATEG_00135 to ATEG_00144 were found to be coexpressed with the PKS encoding gene, and thus were considered to belong to a single BGC (Zaehle et al., 2014). Starting from ATEG_00144, (right upstream of terA), the genes were further labeled from terB (ATEG_00144) to terJ (ATEG_00135). A gene (ATEG_00139), coding for a transcription factor, the putative regulator of the cluster, was denoted terR (Zaehle et al., 2014). Some of the genes of the BGC are encoded on the forward strand and others on the reverse strand (Table 1) (Zaehle et al., 2014). The approx. 43.5 kbp long ter BGC has also been deposited in the Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster (MIBiG) database, a reference database and repository for BGCs (Zdouc et al., 2025) as BGC0000161 (Figure 1).

Table 1.

List of genes constituting the Aspergillus terreus terrein biosynthetic gene cluster, and the functions of the encoded proteins (Zaehle et al., 2014).

Locus tag	Simplified gene name	Orientation relative to terA	Protein function
ATEG_00135	terJ	reverse	membrane transport protein belonging to the major facilitator superfamily
ATEG_00136	terI	reverse	glyoxalase, dioxygenase
ATEG_00137	terH	forward	NAD-binding epimerase
ATEG_00138	terG	forward	membrane transport protein belonging to the major facilitator superfamily
ATEG_00139	terR	reverse	Zn2Cys6 transcription factor
ATEG_00140	terF	reverse	Kelch domain containing oxidase
ATEG_00141	terE	forward	multicopper oxidase
ATEG_00142	terD	forward	FAD-dependent monooxygenase
ATEG_00143	terC	forward	FAD-dependent monooxygenase
ATEG_00144	terB	reverse	multidomain dehydratase - ketoreductase
ATEG_00145	terA	forward	non-reducing polyketide synthase

As a whole, the organization of the ter BGC reflects a typical compact fungal PKS cluster with a core enzyme, additional genes, and a cluster-specific regulator.

3. Functions of proteins encoded in the terrein biosynthetic gene cluster

The general molecular functions of the proteins encoded in the ter BGC are shown in Table 1. The non-reducing polyketide synthase TerA is responsible for the synthesis of the precursors of terrein. The protein utilizes acetyl-CoA as a starter, and extends the fatty acid chain using malonyl-CoA units (Zaehle et al., 2014). The low extension cycle specificity enables adding two to four extender units, leading to different chain length products (orsellinic acid, 4-hydroxy-6-methylpyrone and 2,3-dehydro-6-hydroxymellein) (Zaehle et al., 2014). TerB reduces 2,3-dehydro-6-hydroxymellein to 6-hydroxymellein (Figure 1). Then, the four malonyl-CoA-derived 6-hydroxymellein serves as a precursor to terrein (Yao et al., 2022) and, potentially, to several other SMs (Ugai et al., 2020; Kahlert et al., 2021b) (Figure 1; and see below). TerA and TerB act collaboratively, and a close interaction between the two was proposed (Kahlert et al., 2021b).

The flavin-dependent monooxygenase TerC catalyzes the decarboxylation of 6-hydroxymellein. The resulting intermediate is hydroxylated by TerD, another flavin-dependent monooxygenase (Kahlert et al., 2021a). TerE is also an oxidase, and potentially, TerF is as well (Yin et al., 2016). However, the exact functions of these oxidases are yet to be determined (Zaehle et al., 2014; Yin et al., 2016).

The function of the two major facilitator superfamily transporters TerG and TerJ, is yet unknown; however, they may be responsible for the terrein secretion (Zaehle et al., 2014), possibly also providing self-resistance to the metabolite (Keller, 2015), or they may be not directly and strictly involved in the terrein biosynthesis.

TerH is predicted to be an epimerase, and TerI is a predicted glyoxalase and dioxygenase. Deletion mutants of terH and terI produce terrein in lower amounts than the wild type, showing that these genes may influence, but are not essential for terrein biosynthesis (Zaehle et al., 2014). The exact functions are not known (Yin et al., 2016). Finally, TerR is a zinc-binding Zn₂Cys₆ transcription factor, regulating the transcription of the other genes in the cluster (see below).

Taken together, the proteins encoded in the ter BGC convert simple precursors into terrein through a sequence of polyketide synthesis and tailoring reactions, and presumably also contribute to its secretion.

4. Regulation of the terrein biosynthetic gene cluster

The control of fungal secondary metabolism involves multiple layers of regulation, such as pathway-specific factors directly regulating transcription, global regulatory proteins exerting indirect regulation, and epigenetic mechanisms (Macheleidt et al., 2016).

4.1. Direct transcriptional regulation

TerR is an essential, direct regulator of the ter gene cluster. Disruption of terR results in lack of terrein and other, related SMs (Zaehle et al., 2014). TerR belongs to the group of transcriptional activators with a GAL4-type Zn₂Cys₆ zinc binuclear cluster DNA-binding domain (Gressler et al., 2015a). Transcription factors with this domain are commonly found in fungi, and the domain is the most common type of DNA-binding domains in transcription factors regulating BGCs (MacPherson et al., 2006). The N-terminal of the protein is essential for DNA binding (Gressler et al., 2015a).

All genes of the ter BGC are expressed in the fungus in inducing conditions. In the terR knockout (KO) mutants terE, terF and terH remain expressed at some level, which is considered a background expression (Gressler et al., 2015a), indicating that the expression of these genes is not solely dependent on TerR. On the other hand, the presence of TerR alone is sufficient for the cluster activation, meaning that no other factors or activators are needed, as when terR was expressed in a heterologous system, A. niger, terrein was produced (Gressler et al., 2015a).

TerA and terB are transcribed in opposite directions within the terrein ter BGC (Table 1, Figure 1) (Zaehle et al., 2014). These two genes share a common bidirectional promoter (Gressler et al., 2015a). The expression levels are different tough, the expression of terA being 8–14-fold higher than that of terB. TerE and terF, as well as terH and terI, are also arranged in opposite directions and possess comparable bidirectional promoters (Gressler et al., 2015a). Interestingly, TerR has been shown to exist as a monomer, nevertheless, the promoter has also been reported to enable the binding of a second TerR protein (Gressler et al., 2015a). The consensus sequence for high-affinity TerR binding sites is 5′−TCGGHHWYHCGG−3′. At least one of the high-affinity motifs is present in the promoters of most genes needed for terrein synthesis (terA-F and terJ), but were not detected in the promoter regions of terG, terH, and terI, which are dispensable for terrein production (Gressler et al., 2015a).

Experiments have also shown that the expression rate of the ter BGC is directly regulated by the amounts of TerR, and that TerR levels are the rate limiting step in the promoter activation (Gressler et al., 2015a). The number of motifs and their distance from the transcription start site appear to influence the strength of transcriptional activation (Gressler et al., 2015a).

In summary, TerR is the central activator of the ter BGC. Several genes in the cluster share bidirectional promoters, and number of TerR-binding motifs determine transcription intensity. Most essential genes contain high-affinity TerR motifs, whereas dispensable genes do not.

4.2. Signals influencing terrein production

Experiments have shown that terrein production is induced when A. terreus is inoculated onto fruits (Gressler et al., 2015b). Accordingly, one of conducive conditions for terrein production is growth on sugar-rich plant-derived media such as potato dextrose broth (PDB) (Zaehle et al., 2014). Complex media, such as banana or apple juice cause even stronger gene expression, exceeding that of the expression in PDB. Glucose minimal medium, however, is not permissive for the terrein synthesis. Potato broth does not induce the expression of genes in the cluster by itself, only in the presence of glucose. This points that glucose is required for terrein production (Gressler et al., 2015b).

Growing the fungus on glucose minimal medium supplemented with different additives revealed that methionine triggers a significant induction even at low concentrations (Gressler et al., 2015b). The same was shown for iron limitation (Gressler et al., 2015b). Furthermore, nitrogen starvation is another, strong inductor of BGC activation, and it is considered as one of the major triggers in natural conditions (Gressler et al., 2015b).

Overall, terrein synthesis is promoted by glucose-containing and plant-derived media, while simple glucose minimal medium alone does not induce BGC activation. Specific signals, such as methionine, iron limitation, and nitrogen starvation strongly induce terrein biosynthesis.

4.3. Indirect transcriptional regulation

Terrein production occurs only under certain environmental conditions, implying that terR transcription and activation are regulated by additional transcription factors that transmit environmental signals to the terrein biosynthetic pathway (Gressler et al., 2015a). The signal transduction pathways, which transform environmental stimuli into changes in secondary metabolism (Macheleidt et al., 2016) and their potential crosstalk (Brakhage, 2013) has yet to be examined in this model system.

Some of the downstream global regulators are, however, well characterized. The global transcription factors AreA and AtfA are essential for ter BGC induction during nitrogen starvation (Gressler et al., 2015b). AreA is a global nitrogen regulator (Davis et al., 2005), and AtfA is a stress response transcription factor (Balázs et al., 2010). Accordingly, the elimination of any of the genes encoding these two transcription factors results in strongly impaired terrein production in nitrogen limited conditions, and the double mutant completely lacks terrein (Gressler et al., 2015b). Overexpression of atfA causes increased terrein production, which proves the involvement of the protein in ter BGC induction. AtfA is suspected to be induced by a methionine-dependent signaling cascade, and AtfA induction then leads to terR expression (Gressler et al., 2015b). Indeed, two sites matching the consensus sequence of AreA binding sites can be found in the promoter region of terR, suggesting a direct role of AreA in the activation of terR expression, and consequently, the activation of the ter BGC (Gressler et al., 2015b).

HapX is a transcriptional inducer under iron limitations (Hortschansky et al., 2007). The hapX gene has been shown to influence the activation of the ter BGC, as its elimination significantly reduced the amount of terrein produced (Gressler et al., 2015b). Accordingly, a putative HapX binding site is suspected in the promoter of terR (Gressler et al., 2015b).

Taken together, terrein production depends on environmental cues, indicating that terR is controlled by upstream regulators that have not yet been fully explored in this system. The global regulators AreA and AtfA are key activators of the ter BGC during nitrogen starvation and methionine-triggered signaling, directly promoting terR expression. Under iron limitation, HapX also contributes to ter BGC activation.

4.4. Epigenetic regulation

Specific studies on epigenetic regulation of terrein biosynthesis in A. terreus are limited. Elimination of the hstD, a fungal-specific histone deacetylase gene from A. terreus caused significant upregulation of ter gene expression, and consistently increased terrein production in two test strains (Yao et al., 2023). An additional effect of HstD was also proposed, namely that it could perform post-translational modifications of downstream regulators or enzymes, possibly influencing secondary metabolism on an additional level (Yao et al., 2023).

5. Similar gene clusters in other organisms

Several other, sometimes only distantly related organisms have been shown to possess a gene cluster similar to the A. terreus ter BGC. For the current work, we define “similar BGCs” as clusters that contain at least three genes homologous to any three genes of the ter BGC, with homology understood as a possible common evolutionary origin inferred from sequence similarity. It should be emphasized, however, that sequence similarity does not necessarily imply conservation of function. Nevertheless, incorporating these clusters into comparative studies has the potential to facilitate the functional characterization of genes within the ter BGC (Kahlert et al., 2021a).

Aspergillus lentulus has been shown to produce terrein, and accordingly, possesses a functional ter BGC, consisting of eleven genes (Takahashi et al., 2021). The overall structure, including gene content and gene orientation are almost identical to the BGC in A. terreus (Kahlert et al., 2021a; Takahashi et al., 2021). It was suggested that the regulation of the clusters in the two species is also similar (Takahashi et al., 2021).

The CU-PKS-4 gene cluster (Figure 1) of the lichen forming fungus Cladonia uncialis encodes a polyketide synthase, a ketoreductase-dehydratase and a monooxygenase, homologues of TerA, TerB and TerD (Abdel-Hameed et al., 2016). The other two genes encoding a halogenase and an O-methyltransferase are seemingly not homologous to any of the genes in the ter BGC. It was suggested that the fungus synthesizes 6-hydroxymellein, and after several enzymatic steps, an oxidized, methylated, and halogenated derivative of 6-hydroxymellein is produced (Abdel-Hameed et al., 2016).

Roussoella sp. DLM33 produces a double chlorinated lactone and roussoellatide (a cryptosporiopsin-derived SM) among other SMs. In the genome of the fungus, a BGC similar to the ter BGC was identified (Kahlert et al., 2021a). The core genes are RslA and RslB which are homologs of terA and terB. Furthermore, a gene called RslC is homologous to terC, and a transcriptional activator denoted RslR is homologous to terR (Kahlert et al., 2021a). Additional genes in the Roussoella sp. DLM33 BGC encode two flavin-dependent halogenases (denoted RslK and RslN); a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (RslO) and an O-methyltransferase (RslP) (Kahlert et al., 2021a).

In a common root colonizing fungus (Mandyam et al., 2010; Knapp et al., 2012), Periconia macrospinosa, a putative cryptosporiopsinol BGC was identified, consisting of ten genes. These include homologues of terA-B-C and terR. Additionally, oxygenases, halogenases and an O-methyltransferase are predicted in the BGC, seemingly not being homologous to any of the A. terreus ter BGC genes but having similar genes in the Roussoella sp. DLM33 BGC (Kahlert et al., 2021a). Periconia macrospinosa is known to produce several chlorinated melleins (3,4-dihydroisocoumarins) and cyclopericodiol (Inose et al., 2019), which is a SM related to terrein. However, terrein synthesis was not verified in the fungus.

The fungus Helminthosporium velutinum produces cyclohelminthols (Honmura et al., 2016), SMs related to terrein (Ugai et al., 2020). Correspondingly, its genome contains a cluster (Figure 1), termed cyclohelminthol (chm) BGC (Ugai et al., 2020). The cluster contains nine genes, including chmA, chmB and chmC, homologues of terA-B-C and two putative halogenases, not showing homology to any of the genes of ter BGC (Ugai et al., 2020).

Lachnum palmae is a producer of palmaenones, which are cyclopentenones similar to terrein (Matsumoto et al., 2011). The palmaenone (plo) BGC (Figure 1) was identified in its genome as the one responsible for the synthesis of these SMs (Ugai et al., 2020). In the plo BGC five genes are encoded, and a distinct gene, located in another locus, also showed homology to a gene in the chm BGC. Homologues of terA-B-C, termed ploA-B-C, and three genes, among them two halogenases constitute the plo BGC (Ugai et al., 2020).

It is worth noting that in each of the above-described clusters, the core genes, that is the homologues of terA and terB, are encoded in opposite directions, as in the ter BGC in A. terreus, implying the possibility of conservation in the regulation of gene expression.

These data show that both closely and distantly related fungi harbor biosynthetic gene clusters that are similar to the A. terreus ter BGC, containing at least some putatively homologous genes. However, the chemical outputs and the exact functions often diverge. These ter BGC-like clusters differ in both size and complexity, ranging from smaller clusters, to the nearly identical BGC in A. lentulus, and to clusters that contain additional enzymes allowing more elaborate downstream modifications, in lichen-forming, plant-associated, or endophytic fungi. These organisms produce terrein-like or mellein-derived metabolites, supporting a conserved core biosynthetic logic with lineage-specific modifications.

6. Conclusions and outlook

Studies on the ter BGC have yielded several insights that may extend beyond A. terreus and contribute to the broader understanding of fungal secondary metabolism. Detailed investigations on the ter cluster (and similar BGCs in other organisms) have demonstrated that a relatively compact set of genes can produce a structurally complex polyketide through sequential tailoring reactions (Stroe et al., 2024). This supports the concept that such gene clusters represent versatile metabolic units in fungi. Moreover, studies suggesting that some ter genes are dispensable for terrein biosynthesis underline that BGCs may encode additional, accessory genes (Keller, 2019).

Functional analysis of the cluster-specific transcription factor TerR, together with its identified binding motifs, fits well into the established paradigm of transcriptional regulation in fungal secondary metabolism. TerR-dependent, direct transcriptional regulation, together with indirect transcriptional and chromatin-level modulation, illustrates how pathway-specific and epigenetic factors jointly determine metabolite output—a principle that appears to apply broadly to other fungal BGCs (Lyu et al., 2020). The presence of additional layers of regulation, including global transcription factors responding to environmental signals, and pathway crosstalk, further reinforces the concept of multi-layered regulatory networks controlling fungal secondary metabolite gene clusters (Kwon et al., 2021).

The product of the collaborative action of TerA and TerB (and homologous proteins), 6-hydroxymellein (Kahlert et al., 2021b), seems to be a key intermediate in the synthesis of terrein (Kahlert et al., 2021a) and related SMs (Ugai et al., 2020). Indeed, several terrein derivatives are known in fungi (Reveglia et al., 2020), such as cryptosporiopsin, palmaenones, and others (Ugai et al., 2020; Kahlert et al., 2021a). Notably, the ter BGC lacks halogenases and O-methyltransferases when compared to the similar clusters mentioned above. Instead, A. terreus uses oxidases in the subsequent steps of the synthesis of terrein (Figure 1). The presence of halogenases and O-methyltransferases allows the formation of a wide range of chlorinated and methylated derivatives, such as 5,7-dichloro-6-hydroxymellein, cryptosporiopsin and roussoellatide, among others, which are not produced in A. terreus.

While many functions of terrein have been identified, its general ecological significance is less clear. The phytotoxic activity of terrein - causing lesions on fruit surfaces and inhibiting seed germination - may facilitate plant host colonization or opportunistic pathogenic interactions with plant hosts. The antibacterial and antifungal activities of terrein may aid competition against co-occurring microbes in shared habitats. Additionally, the function of terrein as a reductive agent that mobilizes iron suggests an important contribution to nutrient acquisition under iron-limited conditions. Together, these properties imply that terrein could have multiple ecological roles. Despite the progress made in elucidating the structure, functions, and regulation of the ter BGC, substantial gaps in knowledge remain. The precise roles of several cluster-encoded proteins are still only partially understood or entirely unknown (Yin et al., 2016). The reason for this is that the isolation and structure elucidation of metabolites from different KO transformants lacking ter genes is often unsuccessful because of their instability and/or reactivity (Zaehle et al., 2014). The functional characterization is also hampered by other technical difficulties, such as the low yields and incompatibility of enzymes in heterologous expression systems (Kahlert et al., 2021a).

This represents a limitation in our understanding of terrein biosynthesis in A. terreus. The functions could, theoretically, be elucidated using a combination of approaches. These include (i) targeted genetics, such as gene knockouts, overexpression studies, optimal expression of individual genes or combinations of them in the native host or in an optimal heterologous system (Kjærbølling et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2020), (ii) in vitro enzyme experiments (Cacho and Tang, 2016; Kahlert et al., 2021a) (iii) stable isotope labeling and precursor feeding experiments (Zaehle et al., 2014; Kahlert et al., 2021a).

Moreover, while pathway-specific and certain global regulators of terrein biosynthesis have been characterized, the upstream signaling cascades and the extent of regulatory crosstalk with other signaling pathways have yet to be explored. Epigenetic influences on terrein production have only been partially explored, and their overall contribution remains unclear.

Finally, the ecological role and the possible adaptive significance of similar BGCs in other organisms is poorly understood. Resolving these open questions will be essential for both advancing basic fungal biology and may support exploring potential applications of fungal SMs.

A deeper understanding of the terrein biosynthetic pathway and its regulatory network could also enable a range of biotechnological applications, such as metabolic engineering for enhanced terrein production, production of terrein derivatives (possibly with bioactivities), and the utilization of individual tailoring enzymes for synthetic biology or for the synthesis of custom-designed derivatives.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. Project no. FK142735 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary from the National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund, financed under the FK_22 funding scheme. Projects EKÖP-24-4-II-ELTE-663 and EKÖP-24-3-II-ELTE-752 were supported by the EKÖP-24 University Excellence Scholarship Program of the Ministry for Culture and Innovation from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund.

Author contributions

MN: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition. SC: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. GK: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Correction note

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the scientific content of the article.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. ChatGPT (GPT-5) was used to enhance and polish the language of the text.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.