Abstract
Four rats obtained food pellets by poking a key and 5-s presentations of the discriminative stimuli by pressing a lever. Every 1 or 2 min, the prevailing schedule of reinforcement for key poking alternated between rich (either variable-interval [VI] 30 s or VI 60 s) and lean (either VI 240 s, VI 480 s, or extinction) components. While the key was dark (mixed-schedule stimulus), no exteroceptive stimulus indicated the prevailing schedule. A lever press (i.e., an observing response), however, illuminated the key for 5 s with either a steady light (S+), signaling the rich reinforcement schedule, or a blinking light (S-), signaling the lean reinforcement schedule. One goal was to determine whether rats would engage in selective observing (i.e., a pattern of responding that maintains contact with S+ and decreases contact with S-). Such a pattern was found, in that a 5-s presentation of S+ was followed relatively quickly by another observing response (which likely produced another 5-s period of S+), whereas exposure to S- resulted in extended breaks from observing. Additional conditions demonstrated that the rate of observing remained high when lever presses were effective only when the rich reinforcement schedule was in effect (S+ only condition), but decreased to a low level when lever presses were effective only during the lean reinforcement component (S- only condition) or when lever presses had no effect (in removing the mixed stimulus or presenting the multiple-schedule stimuli). These findings are consistent with relativistic conceptualizations of conditioned reinforcement and extend the generality of selective observing to procedures in which the experimenter controls the duration of stimulus presentations, the schedule components both offer intermittent food reinforcement, and rats serve as subjects.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (190.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Allen K. D., Lattal K. A. On conditioned reinforcing effects of negative discriminative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):335–339. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Auge R. J. Effects of stimulus duration on observing behavior maintained by differential reinforcement magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):429–438. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BERLYNE D. E. Uncertainty and conflict: a point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts. Psychol Rev. 1957 Nov;64, Part 1(6):329–339. doi: 10.1037/h0041135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Badia P., Ryan K., Harsh J. Choosing schedules of signaled appetitive events over schedules of unsignaled ones. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Mar;35(2):187–195. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Branch M. N. Observing responses in pigeons: effects of schedule component duration and schedule value. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):417–428. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinsmoor J. A., Browne M. P., Lawrence C. E. A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jul;18(1):79–85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinsmoor J. A., Mueller K. L., Martin L. T., Bowe C. A. The acquisition of observing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):249–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinsmoor J. A. The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):365–381. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fantino E. Context: a central concept. Behav Processes. 2001 May 3;54(1-3):95–110. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(01)00152-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hantula D. A. A simple BASIC program to generate values for variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Winter;24(4):799–801. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirota T. T. The Wyckoff observing response-a reappraisal. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Sep;18(2):263–276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mauro B. C., Mace F. C. Differences in the effect of Pavlovian contingencies upon behavioral momentum using auditory versus visual stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Mar;65(2):389–399. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mueller K. L., Dinsmoor J. A. The effect of negative stimulus presentations on observing-response rates. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):281–291. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mulvaney D. E., Dinsmoor J. A., Jwaideh A. R., Hughes L. H. Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):37–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nevin J. A., Grace R. C. Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Feb;23(1):73–130. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00002405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rand J. F. Behaviors observed during S- in a simple discrimination learning task. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):103–117. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WYCKOFF L. B., Jr The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Psychol Rev. 1952 Nov;59(6):431–442. doi: 10.1037/h0053932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]