Abstract
Experimenters and teachers use discrimination learning procedures to encourage reliable attending to stimulus differences defined as relevant for their purposes. Put another way, the goal of discrimination training is to establish high-probability stimulus control topographies that are coherent with experimenter or teacher specifications. The present research was conducted to investigate a novel procedure for encouraging stimulus control topography coherence. Participants were 13 adolescents with severe intellectual handicaps. During an initial Condition A, all were exposed to a simultaneous discrimination procedure. Participants could select a form alternating with a black field (S+) or an identical form that did not alternate (S-). Accuracy scores were typically low, and there was little evidence of coherent stimulus control topographies. Subsequently, the procedure was changed. During Condition B, every trial initially presented two identical nonalternating S- forms (Trial State 1). If the participant made no selection for 5 s, one of the forms began to alternate with the black field, and he or she could make the S+/S- discrimination (Trial State 2). Selections during Trial State I prolonged the delay to Trial State 2 until there had been no response for 5 s. During Condition B, S+/S- discrimination accuracy scores improved rapidly and markedly for most participants. Reinstating Condition A often resulted in diminished accuracy scores. This study thus (a) demonstrated a novel procedure for encouraging stimulus control topography coherence and (b) provided support for the interpretation that intermediate accuracy scores may be due to different topographies of stimulus control that co-occur in the same discriminative baseline.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (163.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bickel W. K., Etzel B. C. The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Sep;44(2):245–270. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinsmoor J. A. The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):365–381. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dube W. V., Iennaco F. M., McIlvane W. J. Generalized identity matching to sample of two-dimensional forms in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 1993 Nov-Dec;14(6):457–477. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(93)90038-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dube W. V., McIlvane W. J. Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Nov;68(3):303–316. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HOLLAND J. G. Human vigilance: the rate of observing an instrument is controlled by the schedule of signal detections. Science. 1958 Jul 11;128(3315):61–67. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3315.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- House B. J., Hanley M. J., Magid D. F. A limitation on the law of effect. Am J Ment Defic. 1979 Sep;84(2):132–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MIGLER B. EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:303–307. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders K. J., Spradlin J. E. Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: the development of generalized skills. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):239–250. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders K. J., Spradlin J. E. Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: the effect of training the component simple discriminations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jul;52(1):1–12. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. A note on the measurement of conditional discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Mar;33(2):285–289. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. A note on the measurement of conditional discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Mar;33(2):285–289. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. Adventitious control by the location of comparison stimuli in conditional discriminations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):173–182. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stromer R., McIlvane W. J., Dube W. V., Mackay H. A. Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):83–102. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]