Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2002 May;77(3):373–374. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-373b

Context matters: my education at the Harvard Pigeon Lab.

Terry W Belke 1
PMCID: PMC1284871  PMID: 12083690

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (661.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AZRIN N. H., LINDSLEY O. R. The reinforcement of cooperation between children. J Abnorm Psychol. 1956 Jan;52(1):100–102. doi: 10.1037/h0042490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung S. H., Herrnstein R. J. Choice and delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):67–74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davison M. C., Tustin R. D. The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):331–336. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Villiers P. A. The law of effect and avoidance: a quantitative relationship between response rate and shock-frequency reduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Mar;21(2):223–235. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dinsmoor J. A. Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):311–333. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fantino E. Behavior analysis and decision making. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 May;69(3):355–364. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fantino E. Choice and rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):723–730. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HERRNSTEIN R. J., LOVELAND D. H. COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON. Science. 1964 Oct 23;146(3643):549–551. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3643.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herrnstein R. J., Hineline P. N. Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):421–430. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heyman G. M., Bouzas A. Context dependent changes in the reinforcing strength of schedule-induced drinking. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 May;33(3):327–335. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heyman G. M., Tanz L. How to teach a pigeon to maximize overall reinforcement rate. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):277–297. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Logue A. W. Signal detection and matching: analyzing choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):107–127. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miller H. L. Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):335–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller H. L. Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):335–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Neuringer A. J. Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):417–424. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stolarz-Fantino S., Fantino E. Cognition and behavior analysis: a review of Rachlin's judgment, decision, and choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):317–322. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vaughan W. Melioration, matching, and maximization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Sep;36(2):141–149. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams B. A. Another look at contrast in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):345–384. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES