Abstract
Four experiments examined the free-operant observing behavior of rats. In Experiment 1, observing was a bitonic function of random-ratio schedule requirements for the primary reinforcer. In Experiment 2, decreases in the magnitude of the primary reinforcer decreased observing. Experiment 3 examined observing when a random-ratio schedule or a yoked random-time schedule of primary reinforcement was in effect across conditions. Removing the response requirement for the primary reinforcer increased observing, suggesting that the effects of the random-ratio schedule in Experiment 1 likely were due to an interaction between observing and responding for the primary reinforcer. In Experiment 4, decreasing the rate of primary reinforcement by increasing the duration of a random-time schedule decreased observing monotonically. Overall, these results suggest that observing decreases with decreases in the rate or magnitude of the primary reinforcer, but that behavior related to the primary reinforcer can affect observing and potentially affect measurement of conditioned reinforcing value.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (243.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Branch M. N. Observing responses in pigeons: effects of schedule component duration and schedule value. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):417–428. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daly H. B. Observing response acquisition: preference for unpredictable appetitive rewards obtained under conditions predicted by DMOD. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Apr;11(2):294–316. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.11.2.294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinsmoor J. A., Bowe C. A., Green L., Hanson J. Information on response requirements compared with information on food density as a reinforcer of observing in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Mar;49(2):229–237. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinsmoor J. A., Browne M. P., Lawrence C. E. A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jul;18(1):79–85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gaynor Scott T., Shull Richard L. The generality of selective observing. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Mar;77(2):171–187. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grace R. C. A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):113–129. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HERRNSTEIN R. J. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:27–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KELLEHER R. T., RIDDLE W. C., COOK L. Observing responses in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jan;5:3–13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LEVIS D. J., PERKINS C. C., Jr ACQUISITION OF OBSERVING RESPONSES (RO) WITH WATER REWARD. Psychol Rep. 1965 Feb;16:114–114. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1965.16.1.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mazur J. E. Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice. Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):96–112. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMillan J. C. Average uncertainty as a determinant of observing behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):401–408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell K. M., Perkins N. P., Perkins C. C., Jr Conditions affecting acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential reward. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Dec;60(3):435–437. doi: 10.1037/h0022578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neuringer A. J. Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):417–424. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PROKASY W. F., Jr The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Apr;49(2):131–134. doi: 10.1037/h0046740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perone M., Baron A. Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Nov;34(3):239–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz B. Effects of reinforcement magnitude on pigeons' preference for different fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):253–259. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Squires N., Fantino E. A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):27–38. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steiner J. Observing responses and uncertainty reduction. Q J Exp Psychol. 1967 Feb;19(1):18–29. doi: 10.1080/14640746708400063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ten Eyck R. L. Effects of rate of reinforcement-time upon concurrent operant performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3):269–274. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WYCKOFF L. B., Jr The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Psychol Rev. 1952 Nov;59(6):431–442. doi: 10.1037/h0053932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilton R. N., Clements R. O. The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):161–166. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]