Abstract
The ideal free distribution theory (Fretwell & Lucas, 1970) predicts that the ratio of foragers at two patches will equal the ratio of food resources obtained at the two patches. The theory assumes that foragers have "perfect knowledge" of patch profitability and that patch choice maximizes fitness. How foragers assess patch profitability has been debated extensively. One assessment strategy may be the use of past experience with a patch. Under stable environmental conditions, this strategy enhances fitness. However, in a highly unpredictable environment, past experience may provide inaccurate information about current conditions. Thus, in a nonstable environment, a strategy that allows rapid adjustment to present circumstances may be more beneficial. Evidence for this type of strategy has been found in individual choice. In the present experiments, a flock of pigeons foraged at two patches for food items and demonstrated results similar to those found in individual choice. Experiment 1 utilized predictable and unpredictable sequences of resource ratios presented across days or within a single session. Current foraging decisions depended on past experience, but that dependence diminished when the current foraging environment became more unpredictable. Experiment 2 repeated Experiment I with a different flock of pigeons under more controlled circumstances in an indoor coop and produced similar results.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (219.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baum W., Kraft J. Group choice: competition, travel, and the ideal free distribution. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 May;69(3):227–245. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belke T. W., Heyman G. M. Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):65–81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davison M. C., Hunter I. W. Concurrent schedules: undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):233–244. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davison M., Baum W. M. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):1–24. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davison Michael, Baum William M. Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Jan;77(1):65–89. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harley C. B. Learning the evolutionarily stable strategy. J Theor Biol. 1981 Apr 21;89(4):611–633. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(81)90032-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunter I., Davison M. Determination of a behavioral transfer function: White-noise analysis of session-to-session response-ratio dynamics on concurrent VI VI schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):43–59. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraft J. R., Baum W. M. Group choice: the ideal free distribution of human social behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jul;76(1):21–42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Messina A. V., Abbott G. F., Gray G., Patterson R. H., Jr Primary intracerebral osteoblastoma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1977 Sep;47(3):469–471. doi: 10.3171/jns.1977.47.3.0469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schofield G., Davison M. Nonstable concurrent choice in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):219–232. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shettleworth S. J., Plowright C. M. How pigeons estimate rates of prey encounter. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Jul;18(3):219–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sokolowski M. B., Tonneau F., Freixa i Baqué E. The ideal free distribution in humans: an experimental test. Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Mar;6(1):157–161. doi: 10.3758/bf03210824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]