Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2002 Nov;78(3):249–270. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-249

Categorizing a moving target in terms of its speed, direction, or both.

Walter T Herbranson 1, Thane Fremouw 1, Charles P Shimp 1
PMCID: PMC1284899  PMID: 12507003

Abstract

Pigeons categorized a moving target in terms of its speed and direction in an adaptation of the randomization procedure used to study human categorization behavior (Ashby & Maddox, 1998). The target moved according to vectors that were sampled with equal probabilities from two slightly overlapping bivariate normal distributions with the dimensions of speed and direction. On the average, pigeons categorized optimally in that they attended to either speed or direction alone, or divided attention between them, as was required by different reinforcement contingencies. Decision bounds were estimated for individual pigeons for each attentional task. Average slopes and y intercepts of these individually estimated decision bounds closely approximated the corresponding values for optimal decision bounds. There is therefore at least one task in which pigeons, on the average, display flexibility and quantitative precision in allocating attention to speed and direction when they categorize moving targets.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (269.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashby F. G., Gott R. E. Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Jan;14(1):33–53. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blough D. S. Recognition by the pigeon of stimuli varying in two dimensions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Nov;18(3):345–367. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavoto K. K., Cook R. G. Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2001 Jan;27(1):3–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chase S., Heinemann E. G. Choices based on redundant information: an analysis of two-dimensional stimulus control. J Exp Psychol. 1972 Feb;92(2):161–175. doi: 10.1037/h0032083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook R. G., Katz J. S. Dynamic object perception by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999 Apr;25(2):194–210. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.25.2.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dittrich W. H., Lea S. E. Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):115–129. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dittrich W., Lea S., Barrett J., Gurr P. Categorization of natural movements by pigeons: visual concept discrimination and biological motion. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):281–299. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Emmerton J. The pigeon's discrimination of movement patterns (Lissajous figures) and contour-dependent rotational invariance. Perception. 1986;15(5):573–588. doi: 10.1068/p150573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fremouw T., Herbranson W. T., Shimp C. P. Priming of attention to local or global levels of visual analysis. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Jul;24(3):278–290. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.24.3.278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gallistel C. R., Gibbon J. Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):289–344. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gould S. J., Lewontin R. C. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):581–598. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HERRNSTEIN R. J., LOVELAND D. H. COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON. Science. 1964 Oct 23;146(3643):549–551. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3643.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Herbranson W. T., Fremouw T., Shimp C. P. The randomization procedure in the study of categorization of multidimensional stimuli by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999 Jan;25(1):113–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hodos W., Smith L., Bonbright J. C., Jr Detection of the velocity of movement of visual stimuli by pigeons? J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Mar;25(2):143–156. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirkpatrick-Steger K., Wasserman E. A., Biederman I. Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Jan;24(1):34–46. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.24.1.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Martinoya C., Rivaud S., Bloch S. Comparing frontal and lateral viewing in the pigeon. II. Velocity thresholds for movement discrimination. Behav Brain Res. 1983 Jun;8(3):375–385. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90182-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McKee S. P. A local mechanism for differential velocity detection. Vision Res. 1981;21(4):491–500. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90095-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rilling M. E., Laclaire T. L. Visually guided catching and tracking skills in pigeons: A preliminary analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):377–385. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shimp C. P. Behavior as a social construction. Behav Processes. 2001 May 3;54(1-3):11–32. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(01)00147-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shimp C. P., Friedrich F. J. Behavioral and computational models of spatial attention. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1993 Jan;19(1):26–37. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.19.1.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith R. F. Topography of the food-reinforced key peck and the source of 30-millisecond interresponse times. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):541–551. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Watanabe S. Effects of ectostriatal lesions on natural concept, pseudoconcept, and artificial pattern discrimination in pigeons. Vis Neurosci. 1991 May;6(5):497–506. doi: 10.1017/s0952523800001346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES