Abstract
The extent to which nonhumans are able to form conceptual versus perceptual discriminations remains a matter of debate. Among the great apes, only chimpanzees have been tested for conceptual understanding, defined as the ability to form discriminations not based solely on simple perceptual features of stimuli, and to transfer this learning to novel stimuli. In the present investigation, a young captive female gorilla was trained at three levels of abstraction (concrete, intermediate, and abstract) involving sets of photographs representing natural categories (e.g., orangutans vs. humans, primates vs. nonprimate animals, animals vs. foods). Within each level of abstraction, when the gorilla had learned to discriminate positive from negative exemplars in one set of photographs, a novel set was introduced. Transfer was defined in terms of high accuracy during the first two sessions with the new stimuli. The gorilla acquired discriminations at all three levels of abstraction but showed unambiguous transfer only with the concrete and abstract stimulus sets. Detailed analyses of response patterns revealed little evidence of control by simple stimulus features. Acquisition and transfer involving abstract stimulus sets suggest a conceptual basis for gorilla categorization. The gorilla's relatively poor performance with intermediate-level discriminations parallels findings with pigeons, and suggests a need to reconsider the role of perceptual information in discriminations thought to indicate conceptual behavior in nonhumans.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Astley S. L., Wasserman E. A. Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999 Oct;25(4):415–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bovet D., Vauclair J. Judgment of conceptual identity in monkeys. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):470–475. doi: 10.3758/bf03196181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown D. A., Boysen S. T. Spontaneous discrimination of natural stimuli by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol. 2000 Dec;114(4):392–400. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.4.392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eimas P. D., Quinn P. C. Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. Child Dev. 1994 Jun;65(3):903–917. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fabre-Thorpe M., Richard G., Thorpe S. J. Rapid categorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys. Neuroreport. 1998 Jan 26;9(2):303–308. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199801260-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hampton J. A. Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories. Cognition. 1998 Jan;65(2-3):137–165. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00042-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernstein R. J., Loveland D. H., Cable C. Natural concepts in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1976 Oct;2(4):285–302. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.2.4.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrnstein R. J. Acquisition, generalization, and discrimination reversal of a natural concept. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1979 Apr;5(2):116–129. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.5.2.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hopkins William D., Washburn David A. Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn. 2002 Mar;5(1):27–31. doi: 10.1007/s10071-001-0121-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quinn P. C., Eimas P. D. Perceptual cues that permit categorical differentiation of animal species by infants. J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Oct;63(1):189–211. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schrier A. M., Brady P. M. Categorization of natural stimuli by monkeys (Macaca mulatta): effects of stimulus set size and modification of exemplars. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1987 Apr;13(2):136–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spalding T. L., Ross B. H. Concept learning and feature interpretation. Mem Cognit. 2000 Apr;28(3):439–451. doi: 10.3758/bf03198559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]