Abstract
Three experiments examined the structure of the decision framework used by pigeons in learning a multiple-class same-different task. Using a same-different choice task requiring the discrimination of odd-item different displays (one or more of the display's component elements differed) from same displays (all display components identical), pigeons were concurrently trained with sets of four discriminable display types. In each experiment, the consistent group was tested such that the same and different displays of four display types were consistently mapped onto their choice alternatives. The inconsistent group received a conflicting mapping of the same and different displays and the choice alternatives that differed across the four display types but were consistent within a display type. Experiment 1 tested experienced pigeons, and Experiment 2 tested naive pigeons. In both experiments, the consistent group learned their discrimination faster and to a higher level of choice accuracy than did the inconsistent group, which performed poorly in general. Only in the consistent group was the discrimination transferred to novel stimuli, indicative of concept formation in that group. A third experiment documented that the different display classes were discriminable from one another. These results suggest that pigeons attempt to generate a single discriminative rule when learning this type of task, and that this general rule can cover a large variety of stimulus elements and organizations, consistent with previous evidence suggesting that pigeons may be capable of learning relatively unbounded relational same-different concepts.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ashby F. G., Alfonso-Reese L. A., Turken A. U., Waldron E. M. A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychol Rev. 1998 Jul;105(3):442–481. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.3.442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cook R. G., Katz J. S., Cavoto B. R. Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Oct;23(4):417–433. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.23.4.417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cook R. G., Wixted J. T. Same-different texture discrimination in pigeons: testing competing models of discrimination and stimulus integration. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Oct;23(4):401–416. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.23.4.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dittrich W. H., Lea S. E. Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):115–129. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HERRNSTEIN R. J., LOVELAND D. H. COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON. Science. 1964 Oct 23;146(3643):549–551. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3643.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herbranson W. T., Fremouw T., Shimp C. P. The randomization procedure in the study of categorization of multidimensional stimuli by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999 Jan;25(1):113–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Honig W. K., Matheson W. R. Discrimination of relative numerosity and stimulus mixture by pigeons with comparable tasks. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Oct;21(4):348–362. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.4.348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young M. E., Wasserman E. A. Entropy detection by pigeons: response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Apr;23(2):157–170. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.23.2.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]