Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2002 Nov;78(3):397–408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-397

A new approach to the formation of equivalence classes in pigeons.

Masako Jitsumori 1, Martina Siemann 1, Manuela Lehr 1, Juan D Delius 1
PMCID: PMC1284907  PMID: 12507011

Abstract

Four pigeons were given simultaneous discrimination training with visual patterns arbitrarily divided into two sets, with the stimuli in one set designated A1, B1, C1, and D1 and those in the other set designated A2, B2, C2, and D2. In sequentially introduced training phases, the pigeons were exposed to a series of reversals to establish AB and then CD equivalences. In subsequent testing sessions, a subset of stimuli from one set served as positive stimuli and those from the other set as negative stimuli on training trials, and transfer of the reinforced relation to other members of the sets was tested with nonreinforced probe trials. The pigeons were trained further on AC and BD equivalences and then were tested for the emergence of untrained AD and BC equivalences. Two of the 4 pigeons exhibited the emergence of one of these untrained equivalences, evidence for the emergence of transitive relations. This finding suggests that the pigeons established three-member functional equivalence classes by incorporating separately trained multiple equivalence relations. Repeated reversal training and probe testing enabled us to explore the formation and expansion of functional equivalence classes in pigeons.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Astley S. L., Wasserman E. A. Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999 Oct;25(4):415–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhatt R. S., Wasserman E. A. Secondary generalization and categorization in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):213–224. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. D'Amato M. R., Salmon D. P., Loukas E., Tomie A. Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):35–47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fields L., Reeve K. F., Adams B. J., Brown J. L., Verhave T. Predicting the extension of equivalence classes from primary generalization gradients: the merger of equivalence classes and perceptual classes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):67–91. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hayes S. C. Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):385–392. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herrnstein R. J. Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach. Cognition. 1990 Nov;37(1-2):133–166. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90021-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Iversen I. H., Sidman M., Carrigan P. Stimulus definition in conditional discriminations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):297–304. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuno H., Kitadate T., Iwamoto T. Formation of transitivity in conditional matching to sample by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):399–408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lionello K. M., Urcuioli P. J. Control by sample location in pigeons' matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):235–251. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lipkens R., Kop P. F., Matthijs W. A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):395–409. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schusterman RJ, Kastak D. Functional equivalence in a California sea lion: relevance to animal social and communicative interactions. Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1087–1095. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sidman M., Rauzin R., Lazar R., Cunningham S., Tailby W., Carrigan P. A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sidman M., Wynne C. K., Maguire R. W., Barnes T. Functional classes and equivalence relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):261–274. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tomonaga M., Matsuzawa T., Fujita K., Yamamoto J. Emergence of symmetry in a visual conditional discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychol Rep. 1991 Feb;68(1):51–60. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.68.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES