Abstract
Experiments have shown that human and nonhuman subjects are capable of performing new arbitrary stimulus-stimulus relations without error. When subjects that are experienced with matching-to-sample procedures are presented with a novel sample, a novel comparison, and a familiar comparison, most respond by correctly selecting the novel comparison in the presence of the new sample. This exclusion paradigm was expanded with two California sea lions that had previously formed two 10-member equivalence classes in a matching-to-sample procedure. Rather than being presented with a novel sample on a given trial, the sea lions were presented with a randomly selected familiar member of one class as the sample. One of the comparisons was a randomly selected familiar member of the alternative class, and the other was a novel stimulus. When required to choose which comparison matched the sample, the subjects reliably rejected the familiar comparison, and instead selected the unfamiliar one. Next, the sea lions were presented with transfer problems that could not be solved by exclusion; they immediately grouped the new stimuli into the appropriate classes. These findings show that exclusion procedures can rapidly generate new stimulus relations that can be used to expand stimulus classes.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (324.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Berryman R., Cumming W. W., Cohen L. R., Johnson D. F. Acquisition and transfer of simultaneous oddity. Psychol Rep. 1965 Dec;17(3):767–775. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1965.17.3.767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carter D. E., Werner T. J. Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):565–601. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon L. S. The nature of control by spoken words over visual stimulus selection. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):433–442. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herman L. M., Richards D. G., Wolz J. P. Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins. Cognition. 1984 Mar;16(2):129–219. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kastak C. R., Schusterman R. J., Kastak D. Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Sep;76(2):131–158. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lionello-DeNolf K. M., Urcuioli P. J. Transfer of pigeons' matching to sample to novel sample locations. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Mar;73(2):141–161. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIlvane W. J., Kledaras J. B., Munson L. C., King K. A., de Rose J. C., Stoddard L. T. Controlling relations in conditional discrimination and matching by exclusion. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):187–208. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIlvane W. J., Munson L. C., Stoddard L. T. Some observations on control by spoken words in children's conditional discrimination and matching by exclusion. J Exp Child Psychol. 1988 Jun;45(3):472–495. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(88)90043-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SKINNER B. F. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samuelson L. K., Smith L. B. Grounding development in cognitive processes. Child Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;71(1):98–106. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schusterman R. J., Balliet R. F. Aerial and underwater visual acuity in the California sea lion (Zalophus califernianus) as a function of luminance. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1971 Dec 3;188:37–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb13088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schusterman RJ, Kastak D. Functional equivalence in a California sea lion: relevance to animal social and communicative interactions. Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1087–1095. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127–146. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stromer R., Osborne J. G. Control of adolescents' arbitrary matching-to-sample by positive and negative stimulus relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 May;37(3):329–348. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tomonaga M. Tests for control by exclusion and negative stimulus relations of arbitrary matching to sample in a "symmetry-emergent" chimpanzee. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):215–229. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vincent-Smith L., Bricker D., Bricker W. Acquisition of receptive vocabulary in the toddler-age child. Child Dev. 1974 Mar;45(1):189–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]