Abstract
Pigeons were tested for symmetry after A-B training under conditions designed to avoid problems that may prevent its emergence, namely the change of stimulus location in testing relative to training and the lack of requisite discrimination training. In Experiment 1, samples appeared in two locations during baseline training to minimize the impact of stimulus location. Experiments 2 and 3 included multiple-location training along with additional identity and symbolic matching training, respectively, to explicitly train all of the simultaneous and successive stimulus discriminations required for testing. Experiment 4 provided reinforcement for symmetrical matching relations with some stimulus sets (with multiple-location training) prior to symmetry testing with different sets. In all experiments, pigeons showed no evidence of symmetry despite the fact that baseline (A-B) matching transferred to novel locations. Additional tests for reflexivity (Experiment 2) yielded similar outcomes. These results indicate that the change in stimulus location is not the sole reason that pigeons do not show symmetry and increase the plausibility of arguments that symmetry and other indexes of stimulus equivalence may be beyond the capabilities of the pigeon.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (386.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- D'Amato M. R., Salmon D. P., Loukas E., Tomie A. Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):35–47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dugdale N., Lowe C. F. Testing for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of language-trained chimpanzees. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jan;73(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eckerman D. A., Lanson R. N., Cumming W. W. Acquisition and maintenance of matching without a required observing response. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):435–441. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herman L. M., Gordon J. A. Auditory delayed matching in the bottlenose dolphin. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):19–26. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horne P. J., Lowe C. F. On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185–241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iversen I. H., Sidman M., Carrigan P. Stimulus definition in conditional discriminations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):297–304. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iversen I. Matching-to-sample Performance In Rats: A Case Of Mistaken Identity? J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27–45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kastak C. R., Schusterman R. J., Kastak D. Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Sep;76(2):131–158. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuno H., Kitadate T., Iwamoto T. Formation of transitivity in conditional matching to sample by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):399–408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lionello-DeNolf K. M., Urcuioli P. J. Transfer of pigeons' matching to sample to novel sample locations. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Mar;73(2):141–161. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lionello K. M., Urcuioli P. J. Control by sample location in pigeons' matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):235–251. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lipkens R., Kop P. F., Matthijs W. A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):395–409. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meehan E. Class-consistent Differential Reinforcement And Stimulus Class Formation In Pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):97–115. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oden D. L., Thompson R. K., Premack D. Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1988 Apr;14(2):140–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders R. R., Green G. A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):117–137. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. Adventitious control by the location of comparison stimuli in conditional discriminations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):173–182. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Cresson O., Jr, Willson-Morris M. Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):261–273. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Rauzin R., Lazar R., Cunningham S., Tailby W., Carrigan P. A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Mar;14(1):5–13. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1401.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]