Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2002 Nov;78(3):497–508. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-497

Chimpanzee responding during matching to sample: control by exclusion.

Michael J Beran 1, David A Washburn 1
PMCID: PMC1284912  PMID: 12507016

Abstract

Three chimpanzees performed a computerized matching-to-sample task in which samples were photographs of items and comparison stimuli were geometric symbols called lexigrams. In Experiment 1, samples were either defined (i.e., they represented items that were associated already with a specific lexigram label by the chimpanzees) or undefined (i.e., they did not have an already learned association with a specific lexigram). On each trial, the foil (incorrect) comparison could be either a defined or an undefined lexigram. All 3 chimpanzees selected the correct comparison for undefined samples at a level significantly better than chance only when the foil comparison was defined. In Experiment 2, three comparisons were presented on each trial, and in Experiment 3, four comparisons were presented on each trial. For Experiments 2 and 3, the foil comparisons consisted of either defined or undefined comparisons or a mixture of both. For these two experiments, when the chimpanzees were presented with an undefined sample, they typically made selections of only undefined comparisons. These data indicate that the chimpanzees responded through use of exclusion. A final experiment, however, indicated that, despite the use of exclusion to complete trials with undefined samples correctly, the chimpanzees did not learn new associations between undefined samples and comparisons.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (280.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beran M. J., Savage-Rumbaugh E. S., Pate J. L., Rumbaugh D. M. Delay of gratification in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Dev Psychobiol. 1999 Mar;34(2):119–127. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(199903)34:2<119::aid-dev5>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beran M. J. Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol. 2001 Jun;115(2):181–191. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boysen S. T., Berntson G. G., Shreyer T. A., Quigley K. S. Processing of ordinality and transitivity by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol. 1993 Jun;107(2):208–215. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.107.2.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CUMMING W. W., BERRYMAN R. Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:281–284. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. D'Amato M. R., Salmon D. P., Loukas E., Tomie A. Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):35–47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dixon L. S. The nature of control by spoken words over visual stimulus selection. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):433–442. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dugdale N., Lowe C. F. Testing for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of language-trained chimpanzees. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jan;73(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferrari C., de Rose J. C., McIlvane W. J. Exclusion vs. selection training of auditory-visual conditional relations. J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Aug;56(1):49–63. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1993.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hayes S. C. Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):385–392. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Herman L. M., Richards D. G., Wolz J. P. Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins. Cognition. 1984 Mar;16(2):129–219. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hopkins W. D., Morris R. D., Savage-Rumbaugh E. S., Rumbaugh D. M. Hemispheric priming by meaningful and nonmeaningful symbols in language-trained chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): further evidence of a left hemisphere advantage. Behav Neurosci. 1992 Jun;106(3):575–582. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.106.3.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hopkins W. D., Washburn D. A., Rumbaugh D. M. Processing of form stimuli presented unilaterally in humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behav Neurosci. 1990 Aug;104(4):577–582. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.104.4.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson-Pynn J., Fragaszy D. M., Hirsh E. M., Brakke K. E., Greenfield P. M. Strategies used to combine seriated cups by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and capuchins (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol. 1999 Jun;113(2):137–148. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.113.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Markman E. M., Wachtel G. F. Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cogn Psychol. 1988 Apr;20(2):121–157. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McIlvane W. J., Kledaras J. B., Lowry M. J., Stoddard L. T. Studies of exclusion in individuals with severe mental retardation. Res Dev Disabil. 1992 Nov-Dec;13(6):509–532. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(92)90047-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McIlvane W. J., Kledaras J. B., Munson L. C., King K. A., de Rose J. C., Stoddard L. T. Controlling relations in conditional discrimination and matching by exclusion. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):187–208. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McIlvane W. J., Munson L. C., Stoddard L. T. Some observations on control by spoken words in children's conditional discrimination and matching by exclusion. J Exp Child Psychol. 1988 Jun;45(3):472–495. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(88)90043-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McIlvane W. J., Stoddard T. Acquisition of matching - to - sample performances in severe retardation: learning by exclusion. J Ment Defic Res. 1981 Mar;25(Pt 1):33–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1981.tb00091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McIntire K. D., Cleary J., Thompson T. Conditional relations by monkeys: Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 May;47(3):279–285. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Menzel C. R. Unprompted recall and reporting of hidden objects by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) after extended delays. J Comp Psychol. 1999 Dec;113(4):426–434. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.113.4.426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rumbaugh D. M., Hopkins W. D., Washburn D. A., Savage-Rumbaugh E. S. Lana chimpanzee learns to count by "NUMATH": a summary of a videotaped experimental report. Psychol Rec. 1989 Fall;39(4):459–470. doi: 10.1007/BF03395074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sidman M. Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127–146. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sidman M., Rauzin R., Lazar R., Cunningham S., Tailby W., Carrigan P. A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stromer R. Symmetry of control by exclusion in humans' arbitrary matching to sample. Psychol Rep. 1989 Jun;64(3 Pt 1):915–922. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3.915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tomonaga M., Matsuzawa T., Fujita K., Yamamoto J. Emergence of symmetry in a visual conditional discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychol Rep. 1991 Feb;68(1):51–60. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.68.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tomonaga M. Tests for control by exclusion and negative stimulus relations of arbitrary matching to sample in a "symmetry-emergent" chimpanzee. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):215–229. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES