Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2004 Jan;81(1):39–50. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-39

Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: is there a magnitude effect?

Leonard Green 1, Joel Myerson 1, Daniel D Holt 1, John R Slevin 1, Sara J Estle 1
PMCID: PMC1284970  PMID: 15113132

Abstract

Temporal discounting refers to the decrease in the present, subjective value of a reward as the time to its receipt increases. Results from humans have shown that a hyperbola-like function describes the form of the discounting function when choices involve hypothetical monetary rewards. In addition, magnitude effects have been reported in which smaller reward amounts are discounted more steeply than larger amounts. The present research examines the cross-species generality of these findings using real rewards, namely food pellets, with both pigeons and rats. As with humans, an adjusting amount procedure was used to estimate the amount of immediate reward judged equal in value to a delayed reward. Different amounts of delayed food rewards (ranging from 5 to 32 pellets in pigeons and from 5 to 20 pellets in rats) were studied at delays varying from 1 s to 32 s. A simple hyperbola, similar to the hyperbola-like mathematical function that describes the discounting of hypothetical monetary rewards in humans, described the discounting of food rewards in both pigeons and rats. These results extend the generality of the mathematical model of discounting. Rates of discounting delayed food rewards were higher for pigeons than for rats. Unlike humans, however, neither pigeons nor rats showed a reliable magnitude effect: Rate of discounting did not vary systematically as a function of the amount of the delayed reward.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (143.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bickel W. K., Odum A. L., Madden G. J. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999 Oct;146(4):447–454. doi: 10.1007/pl00005490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chapman G. B., Elstein A. S. Valuing the future: temporal discounting of health and money. Med Decis Making. 1995 Oct-Dec;15(4):373–386. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman G. B. Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 May;22(3):771–791. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.3.771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grace R. The Matching Law And Amount-dependent Exponential Discounting As Accounts Of Self-control Choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jan;71(1):27–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Green L., Myerson J., McFadden E. Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):715–723. doi: 10.3758/bf03211314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Green L., Myerson J., Ostaszewski P. Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Mar;25(2):418–427. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.2.418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hackenberg Timothy D., Vaidya Manish. Determinants of pigeons' choices in token-based self-control procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Mar;79(2):207–218. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jackson K., Hackenberg T. D. Token reinforcement, choice, and self-control in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):29–49. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Madden G. J., Petry N. M., Badger G. J., Bickel W. K. Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Aug;5(3):256–262. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.5.3.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mazur JE. Tradeoffs among delay, rate, and amount of reinforcement. Behav Processes. 2000 Mar 31;49(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00070-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Myerson J., Green L. Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):263–276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Myerson J., Green L., Warusawitharana M. Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Sep;76(2):235–243. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Odum Amy L., Rainaud Carla P. Discounting of delayed hypothetical money, alcohol, and food. Behav Processes. 2003 Oct 31;64(3):305–313. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00145-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rachlin H., Raineri A., Cross D. Subjective probability and delay. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):233–244. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Richards J. B., Mitchell S. H., de Wit H., Seiden L. S. Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):353–366. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodriguez M. L., Logue A. W. Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1988 Jan;14(1):105–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tobin H., Logue A. W. Self-control across species (Columba livia, Homo sapiens, and Rattus norvegicus). J Comp Psychol. 1994 Jun;108(2):126–133. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.2.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES