Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2004 Mar;81(2):155–167. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-155

Bouts of responding on variable-interval schedules: effects of deprivation level.

Richard L Shull 1
PMCID: PMC1284977  PMID: 15239490

Abstract

Rats obtained food pellets on a variable-interval schedule of reinforcement by nose poking a lighted key. After training to establish baseline performance (with the mean variable interval set at either 60, 120, or 240 s), the rats were given free access to food during the hour just before their daily session. This satiation operation reduced the rate of key poking. Analysis of the interresponse time distributions (log survivor plots) indicated that key poking occurred in bouts. Prefeeding lengthened the pauses between bouts, shortened the length of bouts (less reliably), and had a relatively small decremental effect on the response rate within bouts. That deprivation level affects mainly between-bout pauses has been reported previously with fixed-ratio schedules. Thus, when the focus is on bouts, the performances maintained by variable-interval schedules and fixed-ratio schedules are similarly affected by deprivation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (158.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baum W. M. Performances on ratio and interval schedules of reinforcement: Data and theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):245–264. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum W. M., Rachlin H. C. Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861–874. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum William M. From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Jul;78(1):95–116. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blough D. S. Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):237–246. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. COTTON J. W. Running time as a function of amount of food deprivation. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Sep;46(3):188–198. doi: 10.1037/h0061014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark F. C. The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Aug;1(3):221–228. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Conover Kent L., Fulton Stephanie, Shizgal Peter. Operant tempo varies with reinforcement rate: implications for measurement of reward efficacy. Behav Processes. 2001 Nov 1;56(2):85–101. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(01)00190-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dallery J., McDowell J. J., Lancaster J. S. Falsification of matching theory's account of single-alternative responding: Herrnstein's k varies with sucrose concentration. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jan;73(1):23–43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis J. D., Smith G. P. Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions. Behav Neurosci. 1992 Feb;106(1):217–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis J. D. The effectiveness of some sugars in stimulating licking behavior in the rat. Physiol Behav. 1973 Jul;11(1):39–45. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(73)90120-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. GILBERT T. F. Fundamental dimensional properties of the operant. Psychol Rev. 1958 Sep;65(5):272–282. doi: 10.1037/h0044071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hantula D. A. A simple BASIC program to generate values for variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Winter;24(4):799–801. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Killeen Peter R., Hall Scott S., Reilly Mark P., Kettle Lauren C. Molecular analyses of the principal components of response strength. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Sep;78(2):127–160. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kirkpatrick Kimberly. Packet theory of conditioning and timing. Behav Processes. 2002 Apr 28;57(2-3):89–106. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(02)00007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MECHNER F., GUEVREKIAN L. Effects of deprivation upon counting and timing in rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:463–466. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Michael J. Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):149–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nevin J. A., Baum W. M. Feedback functions for variable-interval reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):207–217. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Palya W. L. Dynamics in the fine structure of schedule-controlled behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):267–287. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pear J. J., Rector B. L. Constituents of response rates. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Nov;32(3):341–362. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Perone M., Courtney K. Fixed-ratio pausing: Joint effects of past reinforcer magnitude and stimuli correlated with upcoming magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jan;57(1):33–46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Powell R. W. The effect of reinforcement magnitude upon responding under fixed-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):605–608. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. SIDMAN M., STEBBINS W. C. Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Apr;47(2):114–116. doi: 10.1037/h0054127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. STELLAR E., HILL J. H. The rats rate of drinking as a function of water deprivation. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1952 Feb;45(1):96–102. doi: 10.1037/h0062150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shull R. L., Gaynor S. T., Grimes J. A. Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):247–274. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shull Richard L., Grimes Julie A., Bennett J. Adam. Bouts of responding: the relation between bout rate and the rate of variable-interval reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 Jan;81(1):65–83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shull Richard L., Grimes Julie A. Bouts of responding from variable-interval reinforcement of lever pressing by rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Sep;80(2):159–171. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tolkamp BJ, Kyriazakis I., I To split behaviour into bouts, log-transform the intervals. Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):807–817. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES