Abstract
Although function transfer often has been studied in complex operant procedures (such as matching to sample), whether operant reinforcement actually produces function transfer in such settings has not been established. The present experiments, with high school students as subjects, suggest that stimulus pairings can promote function transfer in conditions that closely approximate those of matching to sample. In Experiment 1, the subjects showed transfer of operant responding from three geometric figures (C1, C2, C3) to three colored shapes (B1, B2, B3) when the latter were paired with the former. Experiment 2 involved two groups of subjects. In the matching group, subjects matched the colored shapes with the geometric figures; in the yoked group, the shapes were merely paired with the geometric figures, and the schedule of stimulus pairing was yoked to the performance of the subjects in the matching group. Both groups of subjects showed function transfer. Experiment 3 documented function transfer from C stimuli to B stimuli through indirect stimulus pairings (A-B, A-C). In Experiment 4, function transfer was obtained even though the subjects vocalized continuously during the pairing trials, presumably preventing covert verbalization that might mediate transfer effects. Our results are consistent with a Pavlovian account and raise difficulties for current operant theories of function transfer.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (345.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Boelens H., Smeets P. An analysis of emergent simple discrimination in children. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1990 May;42(2):135–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dougher M. J., Augustson E., Markham M. R., Greenway D. E., Wulfert E. The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):331–351. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friman P. C., Hayes S. C., Wilson K. G. Why behavior analysts should study emotion: the example of anxiety. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Spring;31(1):137–156. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gatch M. B., Osborne J. G. Transfer of contextual stimulus function via equivalence class development. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 May;51(3):369–378. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayes S. C., Kohlenberg B. S., Hayes L. J. The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):119–137. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Honey R. C., Hall G. Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989 Oct;15(4):338–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horne P. J., Lowe C. F. On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185–241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- James J. H., Wagner A. R. One-trial overshadowing: evidence of distributive processing. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1980 Apr;6(2):188–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaye H., Pearce J. M. The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Jan;10(1):90–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lazar R. Extending sequence-class membership with matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):381–392. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowe C. F., Horne P. J. Reflections on naming and other symbolic behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):315–353. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markham Rebecca G., Markham Michael R. On the role of covarying functions in stimulus class formation and transfer of function. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):509–525. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rizley R. C., Rescorla R. A. Associations in second-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972 Oct;81(1):1–11. doi: 10.1037/h0033333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schroeder S. R., Holland J. G. Reinforcement of eye movement with concurrent schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):897–903. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127–146. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Wynne C. K., Maguire R. W., Barnes T. Functional classes and equivalence relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):261–274. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smeets P. M. Stability of emergent simple discriminations in young children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1994 Jun;57(3):397–417. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1994.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swan J. A., Pearce J. M. The orienting response as an index of stimulus associability in rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1988 Jul;14(3):292–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tonneau F., Sokolowski M. Standard principles, nonstandard data, and unsolved issues. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):266–270. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zentall Thomas R., Galizio Mark, Critchfied Thomas S. Categorization, concept learning, and behavior analysis: an introduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):237–248. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]