Abstract
Fifty participants were exposed to a simple discrimination-training procedure during which six S+ functions were established for six arbitrary stimuli, and S- functions were established for a further six stimuli. Following this training, each participant was exposed to one of five conditions. In the S+ condition, participants were exposed to a stimulus equivalence training and testing procedure using only the six S+ stimuli as samples and comparisons. In the S+/S- condition, participants were exposed to the same training and testing sequence as in the S+ condition, the difference being that three S+ and three S- stimuli were used as sample and comparison stimuli, with each set of three corresponding to the trained equivalence relations. In the S+/S- mixed condition, the S+ and S- stimuli were assigned to their roles as samples and comparisons in a quasi-random order. In the S- condition, all six S- stimuli were used. The no-function condition served as a control condition and employed stimuli for which no stimulus-control functions had been established. The results showed that, on average, participants required more testing trials to form equivalence relations when the stimuli involved were functionally similar rather than functionally different. Moreover, participants required more test trials to form equivalence relations when novel arbitrary stimuli, rather than functionally distinct stimuli, were used as samples and comparisons. The speed of acquisition of stimulus equivalence was also related to the number of functionally similar stimuli established before training. These findings indicate a variety of ways in which the emergence of equivalence relations is affected by the functional classes in which the relevant stimuli participate.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (107.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Augustson E. M., Dougher M. J. The transfer of avoidance evoking functions through stimulus equivalence classes. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;28(3):181–191. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7916(97)00008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnes D., Keenan M. A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and nonarbitrary stimulus relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):61–81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dougher M. J., Augustson E., Markham M. R., Greenway D. E., Wulfert E. The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):331–351. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dougher Michael, Perkins David R., Greenway David, Koons Ashton, Chiasson Carmenne. Contextual control of equivalence-based transformation of functions. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Jul;78(1):63–93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friman P. C., Hayes S. C., Wilson K. G. Why behavior analysts should study emotion: the example of anxiety. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Spring;31(1):137–156. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayes S. C., Kohlenberg B. S., Hayes L. J. The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):119–137. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathews A., MacLeod C. Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annu Rev Psychol. 1994;45:25–50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Musa C. Z., Lépine J. P. Cognitive aspects of social phobia: a review of theories and experimental research. Eur Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;15(1):59–66. doi: 10.1016/s0924-9338(00)00210-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roche B., Barnes D. A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):275–301. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders R. R., Green G. A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jul;72(1):117–137. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watts F. N., McKenna F. P., Sharrock R., Trezise L. Colour naming of phobia-related words. Br J Psychol. 1986 Feb;77(Pt 1):97–108. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb01985.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams J. M., Mathews A., MacLeod C. The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):3–24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wirth Oliver, Chase Philip N. Stability of functional equivalence and stimulus equivalence: effects of baseline reversals. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Jan;77(1):29–47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Rose J. C., McIlvane W. J., Dube W. V., Galpin V. C., Stoddard L. T. Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jul;50(1):1–20. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]