Abstract
Eight crows were taught to discriminate overlapping pairs of visual stimuli (A+ B-, B+ C-, C+ D-, and D+ E-). For 4 birds, the stimuli were colored cards with a circle of the same color on the reverse side whose diameter decreased from A to E (ordered feedback group). These circles were made available for comparison to potentially help the crows order the stimuli along a physical dimension. For the other 4 birds, the circles corresponding to the colored cards had the same diameter (constant feedback group). In later testing, a novel choice pair (BD) was presented. Reinforcement history involving stimuli B and D was controlled so that the reinforcement/nonreinforcement ratios for the latter would be greater than for the former. If, during the BD test, the crows chose between stimuli according to these reinforcement/nonreinforcement ratios, then they should prefer D; if they chose according to the diameter of the feedback stimuli, then they should prefer B. In the ordered feedback group, the crows strongly preferred B over D; in the constant feedback group, the crows' choice did not differ significantly from chance. These results, plus simulations using associative models, suggest that the orderability of the postchoice feedback stimuli is important for crows' transitive responding.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (277.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ALTMANN S. A. A field study of the sociobiology of rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1962 Dec 28;102:338–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb13650.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boysen S. T., Berntson G. G., Shreyer T. A., Quigley K. S. Processing of ordinality and transitivity by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol. 1993 Jun;107(2):208–215. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.107.2.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bryant P. E., Trabasso T. Transitive inferences and memory in young children. Nature. 1971 Aug 13;232(5311):456–458. doi: 10.1038/232456a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bunsey M., Eichenbaum H. Conservation of hippocampal memory function in rats and humans. Nature. 1996 Jan 18;379(6562):255–257. doi: 10.1038/379255a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis H. Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus). J Comp Psychol. 1992 Dec;106(4):342–349. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.106.4.342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones Juli E., Antoniadis Elena, Shettleworth Sara J., Kamil Alan C. A comparative study of geometric rule learning by nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), pigeons (Columba livia), and jackdaws (Corvus monedula). J Comp Psychol. 2002 Dec;116(4):350–356. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.116.4.350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGonigle B. O., Chalmers M. Are monkeys logical? Nature. 1977 Jun 23;267(5613):694–696. doi: 10.1038/267694a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rapp P. R., Kansky M. T., Eichenbaum H. Learning and memory for hierarchical relationships in the monkey: effects of aging. Behav Neurosci. 1996 Oct;110(5):887–897. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.110.5.887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smirnova A. A., Lazareva O. F., Zorina Z. A. Use of number by crows: investigation by matching and oddity learning. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Mar;73(2):163–176. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Treichler F. R., Van Tilburg D. Concurrent conditional discrimination tests of transitive inference by macaque monkeys: list linking. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996 Jan;22(1):105–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weir Alex A. S., Chappell Jackie, Kacelnik Alex. Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science. 2002 Aug 9;297(5583):981–981. doi: 10.1126/science.1073433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zorina Z. A., Kalinina T. S., Markina N. V. Capacity of birds for transitive inference: the solution of the Gillan test by corvids and pigeons. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 1996 Sep-Dec;26(5):454–459. doi: 10.1007/BF02359407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]