Abstract
Palmer has recently criticized Relational Frame Theory (RFT) on the grounds that it has developed data in search of a principle. In this reply, we show that he has done so by attacking fundamental concepts within behavior analysis itself, including the functional nature of an operant and contingencies of reinforcement as a behavioral process. His claim that RFT appeals to new behavioral principles to explain the development of relational operants is shown to be incorrect: As with any operant, RFT appeals to a history of contacted consistencies in contingencies across multiple ex-emplars to explain them. New principles only emerge later as a logically necessary extension of such operants if they exist--a view that Palmer failed to address or appreciate. Palmer's desire to see the use of methods other than matching-to-sample is proper but already largely satisfied in the empirical literature on RFT. We show Palmer's defense of Skinner's definition of verbal behavior to be illogical and unresponsive to the empirical challenge behavior analysis faces. Palmer's alternative common sense mediational associationistic account is another in more than a century of such accounts, all of which have failed empirically. At its root, Palmer's criticism is based on a mechanistic philosophy that is hostile to a traditional functional behavior analytic approach.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (111.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barnes-Holmes Y., Hayes S. C., Barnes-Holmes D., Roche B. Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:101–138. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80063-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bentall R. P., Lowe C. F. The role of verbal behavior in human learning: III. Instructional effects in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Mar;47(2):177–190. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cullinan V. A., Barne-Holmes D., Smeets P. M. A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: searching for the contextual cues that control equivalence responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Nov;76(3):339–349. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Devany J. M., Hayes S. C., Nelson R. O. Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):243–257. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dymond S., Barnes D. A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Sep;62(2):251–267. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dymond S., Barnes D. A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Sep;64(2):163–184. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayes S. C., Hayes L. J., Reese H. W. Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper's World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jul;50(1):97–111. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayes S., Barnes D. Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):235–244. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Healy O., Barnes-Holmes D., Smeets P. M. Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Sep;74(2):207–227. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lipkens R., Hayes S. C., Hayes L. J. Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Oct;56(2):201–239. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1993.1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Palermo D. S. Mediated association in the paired-associate learning of children using heterogeneous and homgeneous lists. J Exp Psychol. 1966 May;71(5):711–717. doi: 10.1037/h0023156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer David C. Data in search of a principle: a review of relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 Mar;81(2):189–204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shapiro S. I., Palermo D. S. Mediation in children's aural paired-associate learning. Child Dev. 1968 Jun;39(2):569–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127–146. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smeets Paul M., van Wijngaarden Marije, Barnes-Holmes Dermot, Cullinan Veronica. Assessing stimulus equivalence with a precursor to the relational evaluation procedure. Behav Processes. 2004 Mar 31;65(3):241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2003.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steele D., Hayes S. C. Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):519–555. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stewart Ian, Barnes-Holmes Dermot, Roche Bryan, Smeets Paul M. A functional-analytic model of analogy: a relational frame analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):375–396. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]