Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2004 Nov;82(3):235–251. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.82-235

Independence of terminal-link entry rate and immediacy in concurrent chains.

Mark E Berg 1, Randolph C Grace 1
PMCID: PMC1285009  PMID: 15693521

Abstract

In Phase 1, 4 pigeons were trained on a three-component multiple concurrent-chains procedure in which components differed only in terms of relative terminal-link entry rate. The terminal links were variable-interval schedules and were varied across four conditions to produce immediacy ratios of 4:1, 1:4, 2:1, and 1:2. Relative terminal-link entry rate and relative immediacy had additive and independent effects on initial-link response allocation, and the data were well-described by a generalized-matching model. Regression analyses showed that allowing sensitivity to immediacy to vary across components produced only trivial increases in variance accounted for. Phase 2 used a three-component concurrent-schedules procedure in which the schedules were the same as the initial links of Phase 1. Across two conditions, the relative reinforcer magnitude was varied. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate was independent of relative magnitude, confirming results of prior studies. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in Phase 2 did not vary systematically across subjects compared to sensitivity to relative entry rate in Phase 1, and regression analyses confirmed again that only small increases in variance accounted for were obtained when sensitivities were estimated independently compared with a single estimate for both phases. Overall, the data suggest that conditioned and primary reinforcers have functionally equivalent effects on choice and support the independence of relative terminal-link entry rate and immediacy as determiners of response allocation. These results are consistent with current models for concurrent chains, including Grace's (1994) contextual choice model and Mazur's (2001) hyperbolic value-added model.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (155.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alsop B., Davison M. Concurrent-chain performance: Effects of absolute and relative terminal-link entry frequency. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):351–365. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsop B., Elliffe D. Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jan;49(1):21–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M. Chained concurrent schedules: reinforcement as situation transition. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):91–101. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baum W. M. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):269–281. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baum W. M., Rachlin H. C. Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861–874. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baum W., Schwendiman J., Bell K. Choice, contingency discrimination, and foraging theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 May;71(3):355–373. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CATANIA A. C. Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:299–300. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chung S. H., Herrnstein R. J. Choice and delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):67–74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davison M. C. Preference for fixed-interval schedules: effects of unequal initial links. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 May;25(3):371–376. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davison M., Baum W. M. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):1–24. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davison M. Bias and sensitivity to reinforcement in a concurrent-chain schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jul;40(1):15–34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davison M. Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):339–349. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Davison M., Jones B. M. A quantitative analysis of extreme choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Sep;64(2):147–162. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Davison Michael, Baum William M. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jul;80(1):95–129. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elliffe D., Alsop B. Concurrent choice: Effects of overall reinforcer rate and the temporal distribution of reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Mar;65(2):445–463. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fantino E. Choice and rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):723–730. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grace R. C. A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):113–129. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grace R. C. Independence of reinforcement delay and magnitude in concurrent chains. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 May;63(3):255–276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grace R., Nevin J. On the relation between preference and resistance to change. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jan;67(1):43–65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Grace R. The Matching Law And Amount-dependent Exponential Discounting As Accounts Of Self-control Choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jan;71(1):27–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Grace Randolph C., Bedell Melissa A., Nevin John A. Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 May;77(3):233–255. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Grace Randolph C., Bragason Orn. Does the terminal-link effect depend on duration or reinforcement rate? Behav Processes. 2004 Jul 30;67(1):67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Green L., Myerson J., McFadden E. Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):715–723. doi: 10.3758/bf03211314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnson Matthe W., Bickel Warren K. Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Mar;77(2):129–146. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Killeen P. On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):263–269. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Killeen P. The matching law. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):489–495. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Landon Jason, Davison Michael, Elliffe Douglas. Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 May;79(3):351–365. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leon M. I., Gallistel C. R. Self-stimulating rats combine subjective reward magnitude and subjective reward rate multiplicatively. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Jul;24(3):265–277. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.24.3.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Macewen D. The effects of terminal-link fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules on responding under concurrent chained schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Sep;18(2):253–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mazur J. E. Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice. Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):96–112. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McDevitt Margaret A., Williams Ben A. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Nov;80(3):261–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. McLean A. P., Blampied N. M. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Jan;75(1):25–42. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ong Ee Lin, White K. Geoffrey. Amount-dependent temporal discounting? Behav Processes. 2004 Jun 30;66(3):201–212. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Squires N., Fantino E. A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):27–38. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Williams B. A., Fantino E. Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jan;29(1):77–86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES