Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2001 Jul;76(1):95–114. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-95

Perceptual classes established with forced-choice primary generalization tests and transfer of function.

K F Reeve 1, L Fields 1
PMCID: PMC1285021  PMID: 11516117

Abstract

In Experiment 1, 20 college students learned two identity conditional discriminations using squares that differed in interior-fill percentage (called Fill23 and Fill77). A two-choice generalization test was then presented with number of test trials varied across groups of subjects. The test samples were 19 squares that ranged in fill value from 23% to 77%; the comparisons were squares with Fill23 and Fill77. The resulting gradients did not vary as a function of number of test trials. When the generalization test was repeated with a third comparison, "neither," the ranges of fill values that occasioned the exclusive selection of Fill23 or Fill77 were direct functions of the number of prior two-choice generalization trials. Finally, a disriminability test revealed that Fill23 and Fill77 were disciminable from the intermediate fill values. In Experiment 2, perceptual classes were established with 5 new students using 760 forced-choice generalization test trials. The student were then trained to select a different glyph in the presence of Fill23 and Fill77, followed by a three-choice generalization test in which the 19 fill stimuli served as samples and the two glyphs served as comparisons. The gradients ovelapped with those previously obtained during the three-choice generalization test that used Fill23 and Fill77 as comparisons. Finally, a discriminability test showed that many adjacent stimuli along thc fill dimension were discriminable from each other. Together, the results of both experiments suggest that ranges of fill-based stimuli functioned as members of perceptual classes, and each class also functioned as a transfer network for a new selection-based response.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (349.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnes D., Keenan M. A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and nonarbitrary stimulus relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):61–81. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CROSS D. V., LANE H. L. On the discriminative control of concurrent responses: the relations among response frequency, latency, and topography in auditory generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:487–496. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DeGrandpre R. J., Bickel W. K., Higgins S. T. Emergent equivalence relations between interoceptive (drug) and exteroceptive (visual) stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):9–18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dougher M. J., Augustson E., Markham M. R., Greenway D. E., Wulfert E. The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):331–351. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fields L., Adams B. J., Verhave T., Newman S. The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):345–358. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fields L., Reeve K. F., Adams B. J., Brown J. L., Verhave T. Predicting the extension of equivalence classes from primary generalization gradients: the merger of equivalence classes and perceptual classes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):67–91. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fields L., Reeve K. F., Adams B. J., Verhave T. Stimulus generalization and equivalence classes: a model for natural categories. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 May;55(3):305–312. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fields L., Verhave T. The structure of equivalence classes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):317–332. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gelman S. A., Markman E. M. Categories and induction in young children. Cognition. 1986 Aug;23(3):183–209. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90034-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gelman S. A., Markman E. M. Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. Child Dev. 1987 Dec;58(6):1532–1541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gelman S. A. The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cogn Psychol. 1988 Jan;20(1):65–95. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90025-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haring T. G., Breen C. G., Laitinen R. E. Stimulus class formation and concept learning: establishment of within- and between-set generalization and transitive relationships via conditional discrimination procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jul;52(1):13–25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hernstein R. J., Loveland D. H., Cable C. Natural concepts in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1976 Oct;2(4):285–302. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.2.4.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Herrnstein R. J. Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach. Cognition. 1990 Nov;37(1-2):133–166. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90021-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Honig W. K., Stewart K. E. Pigeons can discriminate locations presented in pictures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Nov;50(3):541–551. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Innis A., Lane S., Miller E., Critchfield T. Stimulus Equivalence: Effects Of A Default-response Option On Emergence Of Untrained Stimulus Relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jul;70(1):87–102. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kennedy C. H., Itkonen T., Lindquist K. Nodality effects during equivalence class formation: An extension to sight-word reading and concept development. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):673–683. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lubow R. E. High-order concept formation in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):475–483. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Migler B., Millenson J. R. Analysis of response rates during stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):81–87. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Njegovan M., Ito S., Mewhort D., Weisman R. Classification of frequencies into ranges by songbirds and humans. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Jan;21(1):33–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. RISLEY T. GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS FOLLOWING TWO-RESPONSE DISCRIMINATION TRAINING. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Mar;7:199–204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Saunders R. R., Saunders K. J., Kirby K. C., Spradlin J. E. The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):145–162. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sidman M., Wynne C. K., Maguire R. W., Barnes T. Functional classes and equivalence relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):261–274. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Spencer T. J., Chase P. N. Speed analyses of stimulus equivalence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 May;65(3):643–659. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES