Abstract
Background
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common postoperative complication associated with increased mortality. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective intervention for portal hypertension in patients with decompensated cirrhosis; however, the incidence and risk factors for AKI following TIPS in patients with cirrhosis have not been fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate the clinical features of AKI after TIPS in patients with cirrhosis.
Method
Data from 384 patients with decompensated cirrhosis who underwent TIPS treatment were retrospectively collected. AKI was defined using the criteria recommended by 2012 the clinical practice guideline of Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). We conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to evaluate the risk factors for AKI and the association between AKI and all-cause mortality.
Results
Of these 384 cirrhosis patients, 8.3% developed AKI after TIPS treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that independent risk factors associated with AKI were diabetes (OR = 3.632, 95% CI 1.358–9.711, P = 0.010), baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m² (OR = 4.312, 95% CI 1.884–9.868, P = 0.001), serum albumin level (OR = 0.862, 95% CI 0.768–0.968, P = 0.012), postoperative portal venous pressure gradient (PPG) (OR = 1.094, 95% CI 1.010–1.185, P = 0.028), and intraoperative hypotension (OR = 4.669, 95% CI 1.653–13.183, P < 0.004); and AKI was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality within 3 months after TIPS treatment (OR 3.141, 95% CI 1.091–9.038, P = 0.034) .
Conclusion
AKI in patients undergoing TIPS treatment is not uncommon; Diabetes, baseline kidney dysfunction, factors affecting effective circulatory volume, and higher postoperative PPG are closely associated with the occurrence of AKI. AKI is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and medical expenses of those patients.
Keywords: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), Acute kidney injury (AKI), Risk factors, Mortality
Introduction
Portal hypertension is one of the serious complications with higher mortality in patients with decompensated cirrhosis [1–4]. Currently, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has become an effective treatment for portal hypertension in patients with decompensated cirrhosis [5–8]. Due to the process of TIPS includes some potential risk factors like the application of contrast regimen, bleeding, and infections, the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) among those patients has also caused great attention in recent years [9–11]. Previous studies showed that the incidence of AKI in patients undergoing TIPS varies widely from 10% to 30.62%, and the occurrence of AKI also affected the prognosis of patients who received TIPS treatment [12–14]. The high variability of AKI incidence was believed to be related to differences in the enrolled patients and contrast regimens applied, as well as different definitions of AKI applied in the studies [12, 13]. Although TIPS treatment has been applied in decompensated cirrhosis patients in China for more than 30 years, there is still no systematic analysis of the incidence of AKI and its related issues.
Therefore, we performed a retrospective study based on clinical data of 384 Chinese patients with portal hypertension who underwent TIPS treatment. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and the impact of AKI on the outcomes of those patients.
Methods
Study design and population
We conducted a retrospective observational study. The study population included all patients with TIPS treatment between October 2020 and March 2022 at Beijing Shijitan Hospital. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Age 18 years or older. (2) Diagnosis of decompensated cirrhosis, evidenced by clinically apparent ascites, variceal hemorrhage, and/or overt hepatic encephalopathy, as defined by the Baveno VII consensus [15]. (3) Presence of portal hypertension, defined by a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥ 10 mmHg [15]. Patients with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 ml/min/1.73m2, and those with incomplete serum creatinine (SCr) data within 7 days after TIPS for AKI determination were excluded from the study.
The ethical approval for this study was granted by the Institutional Ethical Review Board of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University [sjtkyll-lx-2023-028]). Informed consent for inclusion in the present study was waived because of its retrospective features. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Data collection
The data were retrieved from the patient’s electronic medical charts in the database of our hospital. Each patient’s medical information was reviewed and recorded, including demographic information, etiology of cirrhosis, comorbidities (hypertension and diabetes mellitus), concomitant medications 7 days before operation (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEI] or angiotensin receptor blockers [ARB], diuretics, non-selective beta blockers [NSBBs] and proton pump inhibitor [PPI]), body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), laboratory data on preoperative serum concentrations of hemoglobin, albumin, total bilirubin (TBIL), ammonia, sodium, creatinine, and uric acid. We collected Child-Pugh scores reflecting baseline liver function and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, calculated using the CKD-EPI formula) [16] reflecting baseline renal function. Key intraoperative and postoperative variables were documented. These included the intraoperative contrast dose, the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension (defined as a > 20% reduction in systolic blood pressure from baseline or a sustained mean arterial pressure [MAP] < 65 mmHg) [17], the postoperative portal pressure gradient (PPG), and any postoperative infections occurring within 7 days. In this study, we retrieved SCr levels before surgery, 48 h, and 7 days after TIPS treatment from medical records, as well as changes in SCr in AKI patients until discharge.
Ascertainment of AKI
AKI was defined and staged according to the clinical practice guideline of Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria 2012 [18]. (AKI stage I: increase in Scr > 0.3 mg/dl within 48 h, or increase to at least 1.5 times baseline within the prior 7 days; stage II: increase in Scr 2-2.9 times baseline; stage III: increase in Scr > 4 mg/dl or greater than 3 times of the baseline or receiving renal replacement therapy) [18].
We defined renal recovery at discharge as full recovery with serum creatinine decreased to below the threshold or to the baseline. We defined partial recovery as serum creatinine decreased by 25% or more from peak concentration but remained higher than the threshold or baseline. We defined failure to recover as the patient still being dependent on dialysis or serum creatinine decreased by less than 25% from peak concentration [19].
Outcomes
The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, which was defined as all causes of death within 3 months. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses.
Statistical analysis
Data were presented as absolute variables and percentages (%) for categorical variables and either median with interquartile range (IQR: 25th–75th percentile) or mean with standard deviation according to the distribution of the variables. The Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test was implemented to test for differences between various characteristics. Fisher’s exact or chi-square test was used for categorical variables, as appropriate. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, we analyzed the risk factors for AKI, with AKI as the dependent variable, and all baseline variables as covariates, including age, sex, BMI and comorbidities (hypertension and diabetes mellitus), concomitant medications (ACEI or ARB, diuretics, PPI, NSBBs), SBP, DBP, serum concentration of hemoglobin, albumin, TBIL, ammonia, sodium, creatinine, and uric acid, the grading of encephalopathy, ascites, and prothrombin time prolongation (seconds) in the Child-Pugh Score, eGFR, as well as some operative parameters (such as intraoperative contrast dosage, intraoperative hypotension, PPG value, and postoperative infection). We also examined the association between AKI and all-cause mortality within 3 months after TIPS treatment. An odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was reported for each covariate of interest. Key clinical factors such as age, sex, BMI and all covariates with a P value of less than 0.10 on univariable analysis were entered into the multivariable model. Statistical significance was set at a value of P < 0.05. Analyses were performed with SPSS version 21.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Demographics and clinical characteristics
We first enrolled 399 patients from the database of our hospital, 15 patients were excluded according to the exclusion criteria, and we finally included 384 patients in our study. Post-TIPS AKI occurred in 8.3% of patients (n = 32), while 91.7% (n = 352) were non-AKI patients. (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Flowchart of participant selection. Abbreviations: TIPS: transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, AKI: acute kidney injury
Patients in the AKI group were more likely to have comorbid diabetes mellitus, concomitant medications of diuretics, baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m², a higher Child-Pugh Score, higher level of serum creatinine and uric acid, and lower level of hemoglobin and serum albumin (P < 0.05 or P < 0.001). Regarding operative parameters, patients in the AKI group were more likely to have a higher level of postoperative PPG and a higher proportion of intraoperative hypotension (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in age, sex, etiology, TIPS indications, BMI, blood pressure, baseline serum level of TBIL, ammonia, and sodium, contrast dosages, and postoperative infection between the two groups (P > 0.05). (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics according to the presence of post-TIPS AKI
| Characteristic | All (n = 384) | Non-AKI (n = 352) | AKI (n = 32) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 53.17 ± 13.35 | 52.85 ± 13.07 | 56.75 ± 13.62 | 0.108 |
| Female, n (%) | 122(31.8) | 110(31.3) | 12(37.5) | 0.467 |
| Etiology of cirrhosis, n (%) | 0.368 | |||
| Viral hepatitis | 184(47.9) | 172(48.9) | 12(37.5) | |
| Drug-induced liver injury | 46(12.0) | 42(11.9) | 4(12.5) | |
| Alcohol-associated | 36(9.4) | 32(9.1) | 4(12.5) | |
| Autoimmune hepatitis | 30(7.8) | 26(7.4) | 4(12.5) | |
| Cholestatic hepatitis | 24(6.3) | 20(5.7) | 4(12.5) | |
| Others | 64(16.7) | 60(17.0) | 4(12.5) | |
| TIPS Indications | 0.186 | |||
| Refractory ascites | 162(42.2) | 148(42.0) | 14(43.8) | |
| Variceal Bleed | 192(50.0) | 179(50.9) | 13(40.6) | |
| Multiple Indications | 30(7.8) | 25(7.1) | 5(15.6) | |
| Child-Pugh Score | 8.11 ± 2.24 | 8.32 ± 1.70 | 9.13 ± 1.68 | 0.011 |
| Encephalopathy | 2(1,2) | 2(1,2) | 2(1,2) | 0.154 |
| Ascites | 2(2,3) | 2(2,3) | 2.5(2,3) | 0.050 |
| Bilirubin | 1(1,2) | 1(1,2) | 1(1,2) | 0.661 |
| Albumin | 2(2,2) | 2(2,2) | 2(2,2.75) | 0.001 |
| Prothrombin Time (sec prolonged) | 1(1,2) | 1(1,2) | 1(1,1.75) | 0.544 |
| Complications, n (%) | ||||
| Diabetes | 74(19.3) | 62(17.6) | 12(37.5) | 0.006 |
| Hypertension | 32(8.3) | 32(9.1) | 0(0) | 0.148 |
| Concomitant medications, n (%) | ||||
| ACEI or ARB | 31(8.7) | 27(7.7) | 4(12.5) | 0.534 |
| Diuretics | 283(79.1) | 254(72.2) | 29(90.6) | 0.039 |
| PPI | 302(84.4) | 275(78.1) | 27(84.4) | 0.548 |
| NSBBs | 258(67.2) | 238(67.6) | 20(62.5) | 0.555 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.94 ± 3.50 | 22.73 ± 3.80 | 23.39 ± 3.97 | 0.353 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 128.82 ± 17.11 | 128.94 ± 17.16 | 127.50 ± 16.76 | 0.646 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 72.86 ± 9.90 | 72.69 ± 9.36 | 74.69 ± 14.66 | 0.455 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 90.65 ± 24.28 | 90.76 ± 24.07 | 89.44 ± 26.89 | 0.012 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 32.56 ± 3.79 | 32.76 ± 3.76 | 30.36 ± 3.42 | 0.001 |
| TBIL (umol/L) | 29.34 ± 18.07 | 29.39 ± 18.20 | 28.94 ± 16.85 | 0.895 |
| Ammonia (mmol/L) | 49.35(35.95, 54.98) | 43.95(36.10, 53.93) | 44.55(28.98, 64.95) | 0.997 |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | 139.17 ± 4.32 | 139.23 ± 4.38 | 138.50 ± 3.52 | 0.358 |
| SCr (umol/L) | 65.50(54.25, 78.50) | 65.00(52.00, 75.75) | 90.50(70.00, 128.75) | < 0.001 |
| Uric acid (umol/L) | 318.50(239.25, 406.75) | 306.00(226.75, 402.75) | 392.00(275.25, 562.25) | 0.004 |
| eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²(%) | 52(13.5) | 38(10.8) | 14(43.8) | < 0.001 |
| Administered contrast (ml) | 95.36 ± 46.83 | 94.65 ± 46.63 | 103.13 ± 49.08 | 0.328 |
| Postoperative PPG (mmHg) | 10.96 ± 5.41 | 10.60 ± 5.44 | 13.69 ± 4.34 | 0.003 |
| Intraoperative hypotension (%) | 26(6.8) | 18(5.1) | 8(25) | 0.001 |
| Postoperative infection (%) | 206(53.6) | 184(52.3) | 22(68.8) | 0.074 |
Note: Values for categorical variables are given as number (percentage); for continuous variables, as mean ± standard deviation or median [IQR]
Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury. ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers. PPI, proton pump inhibitor. NSBBs, non-selective beta blockers. BMI, body mass index. SBP, systolic blood pressure. DBP, diastolic blood pressure. TBIL, total bilirubin. SCr, serum creatinine. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate. PPG, portal pressure gradient
AKI stages and renal recovery
Among the patients who developed AKI, the majority of them were in mild severity [stage 1: 18 (56.3% of AKI episodes) patients, stage 2: 8 (25%) patient, and stage 3: 6 (18.7%) patients], 2 (6.25%) patients received acute renal replacement therapy. The median time from surgery initiation to AKI was 3.5 (IQR 2.5 to 6.5) days. At the time of discharge, among 32 patients with AKI, 6 (18.8%) patients had full renal recovery, 22 (75.0%) patients had partial recovery, and 4 (6.3%) patients had no recovery. (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
ASKI stages and renal recovery. Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury
Risk factors associated with AKI
Results of univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were summarized in Table 2. Unadjusted analysis revealed post-TIPS AKI was associated with comorbidities of diabetes, concomitant medications of diuretics, baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m², Child-Pugh Score-Ascites, baseline serum level of albumin and uric acid, postoperative PPG, and intraoperative hypotension(P < 0.10); Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors independently associated with post-TIPS AKI included combination of diabetes (OR = 3.632, 95% CI 1.358–9.711, P = 0.010), baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (OR = 4.312, 95%CI 1.884–9.868, P = 0.001), decreased albumin level (OR = 0.862, 95%CI 0.768–0.968, P = 0.012), increased postoperative PPG (OR = 1.094, 95%CI 1.010–1.185, P = 0.028), and intraoperative hypotension (OR = 4.669, 95%CI 1.653–13.183, P = 0.004).
Table 2.
Risk factors associated with post-TIPS AKI
| Variables | Unadjusted | Multivariate adjusted * | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | P-value | OR | 95% CI | P-value | |
| Age (year) | 1.025 | 0.995–1.056 | 0.109 | - | - | - |
| Female, n (%) | 1.320 | 0.623–2.795 | 0.468 | - | - | - |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.039 | 0.940–1.149 | 0.455 | - | - | - |
| Diabetes | 2.806 | 1.304–6.040 | 0.008 | 3.632 | 1.358–9.711 | 0.010 |
| Diuretics | 5.551 | 1.301–23.684 | 0.021 | - | - | - |
| Child-Pugh Score-Ascites | 1.659 | 0.991–2.779 | 0.054 | - | - | - |
| Serum albumin (g/L) | 0.840 | 0.795–0.929 | 0.001 | 0.862 | 0.768–0.968 | 0.012 |
| Uric acid (umol/L) | 1.003 | 1.001–1.006 | 0.005 | - | - | - |
| eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² | 6.386 | 2.941–13.867 | < 0.001 | 4.312 | 1.884–9.868 | 0.001 |
| Postoperative PPG (mmHg) | 1.110 | 1.025–1.190 | 0.004 | 1.094 | 1.010–1.185 | 0.028 |
| Intraoperative hypotension | 6.185 | 2.440-15.679 | < 0.001 | 4.669 | 1.653–13.183 | 0.004 |
Key clinical factors such as age, sex, BMI and all covariates with a P value of less than 0.10 on univariable analysis were entered into the multivariable model, including comorbidities of diabetes, combined diuretics, the grading of ascites in the Child-Pugh Score, the serum level of albumin and uric acid, baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2, postoperative PPG, and intraoperative hypotension
Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio. CI, confidence interval. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate. PPG, portal pressure gradient. The hyphen symbol (‘-‘) indicates that the variable was excluded from the final multivariate logistic regression model
The association between AKI and outcomes
During a median follow-up of 3.0 (interquartile range, 2.8–3.3) months, there were 7(21.9%) and 22(6.3%) deaths in the AKI group and non-AKI group, respectively. The all-cause mortality of AKI group is higher than that of non-AKI group (P = 0.004) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Comparison of outcomes between non-AKI group and AKI group patients
| Characteristics | Non-AKI (n = 352) | AKI (n = 32) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-month mortality, n (%) | 22(6.3) | 7(21.9) | 0.004 |
| Cause of death | 0.494 | ||
| Hepatic encephalopathy | 6(27.3) | 2(28.6) | |
| Esophageal variceal bleed | 7(31.8) | 2(28.6) | |
| AKI | 0 | 1(14.3) | |
| Severe infection | 4(18.2) | 1(14.3) | |
| Other causes | 5(22.7) | 1(14.3) | |
| Hospitalization time (days) | 25.99 ± 5.35 | 29.63 ± 7.21 | 0.009 |
|
Hospitalization expenses (×10,000 CNY) |
12.65 ± 4.11 | 15.17 ± 3.63 | < 0.001 |
Abbreviations: CNY, Chinese Yuan. AKI, Acute Kidney Injury
The leading causes of mortality were hepatic encephalopathy, esophageal variceal bleed, AKI and severe infection. A comparison of the spectrum of causes of death between patients with and without AKI revealed no statistically significant differences (Table 3).
Compared with non-AKI patients, AKI patients had significantly longer hospital stays (P = 0.009) and higher hospitalization costs (P < 0.001).
The results of logistic regression analysis showed AKI was associated with higher odds ratios for 3-month all-cause mortality compared with that in non-AKI group in unadjusted analyses (OR = 4.200, 95% CI 1.636–6.560, P = 0.003). After adjusting (Model 1 was adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and primary diseases, including age, sex, BMI and comorbidities of hypertension, diabetes and the grading of encephalopathy, ascites, and prothrombin time prolongation (seconds) in the Child-Pugh Score; Model 2 was adjusted for model 1 plus laboratory tests and operative related factors, including serum levels of albumin, total bilirubin, baseline eGFR and postoperative PPG, intraoperative hypotension, and postoperative infection), the association was slightly affected but observed consistent as before (Model 1: OR = 3.129, 95% CI 1.133–8.645, P = 0.028; Model 2: OR = 3.141, 95%CI 1.091–9.038, P = 0.034) (Table 4).
Table 4.
The association between post-TIPS AKI and 3-month all-cause mortality
| Groups | Unadjusted Model | Multivariate Model 1 | Multivariate Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Non-AKI | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) | |||
| AKI | 4.200(1.636–6.560) | 0.003 | 3.129(1.133–8.645) | 0.028 | 3.141(1.091–9.038) | 0.034 |
Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted ORs were analyzed by the binary logistic regression model with all-cause death. Multivariable model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI and comorbidities of hypertension, diabetes and the grading of encephalopathy, ascites, and prothrombin time prolongation (seconds) in the Child-Pugh Score. Multivariable model 2 was adjusted for model 1 plus serum levels of albumin, total bilirubin, baseline eGFR and postoperative PPG, intraoperative hypotension and postoperative infection.
Discussion
In this retrospective analysis, we found that the incidence of postoperative AKI was 8.3% in a group of decompensated cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension and receiving TIPS treatment, the associated risk factors with the incidence of AKI among these patients were diabetes, baseline eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m², lower serum albumin level, intraoperative hypotension, and postoperative high PPG. Patients who developed AKI had significantly increased length of hospital stay, medical expenses, and risk of 3-month all-cause mortality compared to non-AKI patients.
The reported incidence of TIPS-related AKI varies considerably across existing studies [12–14]. The difference in AKI incidence in previous studies may be related to the following aspects. First, the TIPS-related treatment has been gradually improved and modified in recent years [20, 21], such as the appearance of newly designed TIPS surgical instruments [22, 23], application of low-osmotic or iso-osmotic contrast agents, and a more accurate and safer volume detection system [24, 25] have brought great improvement in the safety of the operation and reduced the occurrence of complications. Second, there were differences in the race and primary diseases of TIPS-treated patients in different studies. In the ALTA study, the leading cause of the disease was alcoholic cirrhosis [13], while in our study, the leading cause was hepatitis B. These differences in race and primary diseases might be involved in the occurrence of AKI in patients experiencing TIPS treatment. Third, the diagnostic criteria of AKI were inconsistent until the 2012 KDIGO AKI guideline was published; this inconsistency in AKI definition affected the assessment of AKI. Compared with previous studies, we used the AKI diagnostic criteria recommended by the 2012 KDIGO guidelines, ensuring the sensitivity and specificity of AKI diagnosis in the selected patients. Future studies about the incidence of AKI in patients of different races and regions are needed by using this criterion of AKI.
Another important issue concerning TIPS-related AKI is the associated risk factors for the incidence of AKI. Previous studies have found that diabetes, baseline kidney function abnormalities, and decreased serum albumin levels were independent risk factors for AKI after TIPS. Danziger et al. observed 163 TIPS-treated patients from 2001 to 2011 and found that for every 50 ml increase in contrast agent dose during TIPS treatment, the risk of AKI increased by 1.6-fold [12]. Besides, some studies also indicated that the concentration and dose of iodine-containing contrast agents are important determinants of renal toxicity [26–28]. In our study, the use of contrast regimens did not become an independent risk factor for the occurrence of AKI, possibly because the patients in this study generally received low-osmotic or iso-osmotic contrast agents with lower renal toxicity [29], and the contrast dose was significantly lower than those in the abovementioned studies (95.4 ± 46.8 ml vs. 165.2 ± 50.7 ml). At the same time, diabetes and baseline kidney dysfunction were also identified as independent risk factors of AKI [30–34] in our analysis among patients undergoing TIPS treatment. In our study, postoperative PPG in the AKI group was significantly higher than in the non-AKI group, and postoperative high PPG became an independent risk factor for the occurrence of AKI. Portal hypertension is associated with elevated levels of endogenous vasodilatory substances, including nitric oxide [35–38]. TIPS could reverse these changes by lowering PPG [39, 40]. A reduction in the PPG following TIPS placement is a critical step in achieving the therapeutic goals for portal hypertension, exerting a direct influence on renal hemodynamics and perfusion status [41]. An appropriate reduction in PPG contributes to a decrease in portosystemic vascular resistance, which can alleviate organ congestion secondary to portal hypertension and improve systemic and renal hemodynamics [42]. Consequently, this enhances renal arterial perfusion pressure, promotes the restoration of renal tissue blood flow, improves the glomerular filtration rate, and thereby ameliorates renal function. Hypoalbuminemia is a common complication in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Albumin in the plasma plays a critical role in maintaining plasma colloid osmotic pressure, which is essential for stabilizing blood volume. This mechanism helps prevent fluid extravasation from the intravascular compartment into the interstitial space, thereby reducing the occurrence of edema. Additionally, albumin exhibits both antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Its antioxidant activity is primarily manifested through the scavenging of free radicals and binding to harmful metal ions, which mitigates oxidative stress-induced tissue damage [43]. Furthermore, albumin modulates inflammatory responses by inhibiting the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, thereby exerting a protective effect in systemic inflammatory states [44], particularly in conditions such as liver disease and infections [45]. In addition, decreased serum albumin and the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension were related to the occurrence of AKI in end-stage liver disease patients by affecting effective circulating volume [46–48]. The changes in the associated risk factors of AKI in TIPS-treated patients also reflect that the TIPS treatment procedure continues to be upgraded.
Furthermore, there were significant differences in prognosis and medical expenses between AKI and non-AKI patients in this study. Due to the differences in the primary disease of cirrhosis with portal hypertension in previous studies, there are variations in the overall mortality rates of patients in different studies [49]. However, the comparison between the AKI and non-AKI groups both suggested that the former had a significantly higher mortality rate [50] and a significant increase in medical costs. This indicated that early prevention of AKI is important in improving the overall treatment outcomes for those patients.
Limitations
This study has several limitations. First, due to the retrospective nature of this study, specific time points of renal function data may be missing during the data collection process, resulting in patients being unable to be included in our study. Second, patients with portal hypertension who progress to TIPS treatment often have multiple complications, leading to neglecting the monitoring of changes in kidney function, ultimately resulting in their exclusion from this study. Future studies are needed to evaluate the clinical features of AKI among patients undergoing TIPS treatment.
Conclusions
In conclusion, AKI in decompensated cirrhosis patients undergoing TIPS treatment is not uncommon; Diabetes, baseline renal function abnormalities, factors affecting effective circulatory volume, and higher postoperative PPG are closely associated with the occurrence of AKI. AKI is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and medical expenses of those patients. Early detection and proper intervention of AKI based on individual characteristics are necessary.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank Dr. Fu-Quan Liu, Chief Physician, and Dr. Zhen-Hua Fan, Attending Physician, from the Interventional Therapy Center at Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, for providing clinical data support for this study.
Abbreviations
- AKI
Acute kidney injury
- TIPS
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
- eGFR
estimated glomerular filtration rate
- PPG
Portal venous pressure gradient
- HVPG
Hepatic venous pressure gradient
- ESRD
End-stage renal disease
- SCr
Serum creatinine
- ACEI
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
- ARB
Angiotensin receptor blockers
- PPI
Proton pump inhibitor
- NSBBs
Non-selective beta blockers
- BMI
Body mass index
- SBP
Systolic blood pressure
- DBP
Diastolic blood pressure
- MAP
Mean arterial pressure
- TBIL
Total bilirubin
- PT
Prothrombin time
- KDIGO
Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes
- IQR
Interquartile range
- OR
Odds ratio
- CI
Confidence interval
- CNY
Chinese Yuan
- ALTA
Advancing Liver Therapeutic Approaches
- RAAS
Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system
Author contributions
MJ: Data collection, analysis, manuscript writing. YDG, PPY: Statistical data analysis.XLZ: Data collection. YL: Study design, manuscript revision.
Funding
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Research and Development Project of China Railway Co., Ltd. (J2022Z608), and Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (CFH 2022-2-2081).
Data availability
The datasets analyzed in the current study are not publicly available to ensure the privacy of research participants and comply with the regulations of the ethics approval. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The data analysis was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University [Ethics Approval Number: sjtkyll-lx-2023(028)].
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Mellinger JL, Shedden K, Winder GS, et al. The high burden of alcoholic cirrhosis in privately insured persons in the united States. Hepatology. 2018;68(3):872–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mazumder NR, Celaj S, Atiemo K, et al. Liver-related mortality is similar among men and women with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2020;73(5):1072–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ginès P, Krag A, Abraldes JG, Solà E, Fabrellas N, Kamath PS. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2021;398(10308):1359–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lesmana C, Raharjo M, Gani RA. Managing liver cirrhotic complications: overview of esophageal and gastric varices. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2020;26(4):444–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Colombato L. The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the management of portal hypertension. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41(Suppl 3):S344–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dariushnia SR, Haskal ZJ, Midia M, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(1):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tripathi D, Stanley AJ, Hayes PC, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in the management of portal hypertension. Gut. 2020;69(7):1173–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wong F. Management of refractory Ascites. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023;29(1):16–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Patel RK, Chandel K, Tripathy TP, Mukund A. Complications of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the era of the stent graft - What the interventionists need to know. Eur J Radiol. 2021;144:109986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gaba RC, Khiatani VL, Knuttinen MG, et al. Comprehensive review of TIPS technical complications and how to avoid them. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(3):675–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sankar K, Moore CM. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. JAMA. 2017;317(8):880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Danziger J, Thummalakunta L, Nelson R, Faintuch S. The risk of acute kidney injury with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Nephrol. 2015;28(6):725–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ge J, Lai JC, Boike JR, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetes mellitus are associated with Post-Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt renal dysfunction: an advancing liver therapeutic approaches group study. Liver Transpl. 2021;27(3):329–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li R, Sarin S. Evaluating outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure among native Americans. Am J Med Sci. 2025;369(2):145–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C, Baveno VII. Faculty. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022;76(4):959–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wickham AJ, Highton DT, Clark S, et al. Treatment threshold for intra-operative hypotension in clinical practice-a prospective cohort study in older patients in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2022;77(2):153–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Palevsky PM, Liu KD, Brophy PD, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(5):649–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang L, Xing G, Wang L, et al. Acute kidney injury in china: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2015;386(10002):1465–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Garbuzenko DV. Milestones to optimize of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt technique as a method for the treatment of portal hypertension complications. World J Hepatol. 2024;16(6):891–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lucatelli P, Krajina A, Loffroy R, et al. CIRSE standards of practice on transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024;47(12):1710–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Farsad K, Narasimhan E, Russell L, Kaufman JA. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation using a radiofrequency wire: prospective clinical safety and feasibility trial in cirrhosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(9):1401–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.RiChard J, Thornburg B. New techniques and devices in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2018;35(3):206–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kamel YA, Elmoniar MM, Fathi YI, Lotfi ME, Alwarraky MS, Yassen KA. Monitoring haemodynamic changes during transjugular portosystemic shunt insertion with electric cardiometry in sedated and spontaneous breathing patients. A diagnostic test accuracy study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2023;39(1):127–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bannas P, Roldán-Alzate A, Johnson KM, et al. Longitudinal monitoring of hepatic blood flow before and after TIPS by using 4D-Flow MR imaging. Radiology. 2016;281(2):574–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Robert-Edan V. Iodinated contrast medium renal toxicity: the Phantom menace or much ado about nothing. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(7):e745–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McCullough PA, Choi JP, Feghali GA, et al. Contrast-Induced acute kidney injury. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(13):1465–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mamoulakis C, Tsarouhas K, Fragkiadoulaki I, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy: basic concepts, pathophysiological implications and prevention strategies. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;180:99–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li Y, Wang J. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a review of definition, pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention and treatment. BMC Nephrol. 2024;25(1):140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Thakar CV, Christianson A, Himmelfarb J, Leonard AC. Acute kidney injury episodes and chronic kidney disease risk in diabetes mellitus. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(11):2567–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.James MT, Grams ME, Woodward M, et al. A Meta-analysis of the association of estimated GFR, Albuminuria, diabetes Mellitus, and hypertension with acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(4):602–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaur A, Sharma GS, Kumbala DR. Acute kidney injury in diabetic patients: A narrative review. Med (Baltim). 2023;102(21):e33888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Infante B, Conserva F, Pontrelli P, et al. Recent advances in molecular mechanisms of acute kidney injury in patients with diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:903970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu J, Xie H, Ye Z, Li F, Wang L. Rates, predictors, and mortality of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ginès P, Schrier RW. Renal failure in cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(13):1279–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Maiwall R, Sarin SK, Moreau R. Acute kidney injury in acute on chronic liver failure. Hepatol Int. 2016;10(2):245–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nadim MK, Kellum JA, Forni L, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: acute disease quality initiative (ADQI) and international club of Ascites (ICA) joint multidisciplinary consensus meeting. J Hepatol. 2024;81(1):163–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reiterer C, Taschner A, Luf F, et al. Effect of liver resection-induced increases in hepatic venous pressure gradient on development of postoperative acute kidney injury. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23(1):21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Queck A, Schwierz L, Gu W, et al. Targeted decrease of portal hepatic pressure gradient improves Ascites control after TIPS. Hepatology. 2023;77(2):466–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lv Y, Wang Q, Luo B, et al. Identifying the optimal measurement timing and hemodynamic targets of portal pressure gradient after TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. J Hepatol. 2024: S0168-8278(24)02485-1 [pii]. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Juanola A, Ma AT, Gratacós-Ginès J, et al. Renal complications in portal hypertension. Clin Liver Dis. 2024;28(3):503–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Abdelwahed AH, Aboeldahb M, Wu GY. Effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on renal and pulmonary function in hepatic decompensation with and without hepatorenal and hepatopulmonary syndromes: A review. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2024;12(9):780–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Farrugia A, Mori F. Therapeutic solutions of human Albumin - The possible effect of Process-Induced molecular alterations on clinical efficacy and safety. J Pharm Sci. 2022;111(5):1292–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tamion F. [Albumin in sepsis]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2010;29(9):629–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Duran-Güell M, Flores-Costa R, Casulleras M, et al. Albumin protects the liver from tumor necrosis factor α-induced immunopathology. FASEB J. 2021;35(2):e21365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Rich NE, Wong VW. AGA clinical practice update on the use of vasoactive drugs and intravenous albumin in cirrhosis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol. 2024;166(1):202–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ginès P, Solà E, Angeli P, Wong F, Nadim MK, Kamath PS. Hepatorenal syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Arques S. Human serum albumin in cardiovascular diseases. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;52:8–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Trebicka J, Fernandez J, Papp M, et al. The PREDICT study uncovers three clinical courses of acutely decompensated cirrhosis that have distinct pathophysiology. J Hepatol. 2020;73(4):842–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Miwa T, Utakata Y, Hanai T, et al. Acute kidney injury development is associated with mortality in Japanese patients with cirrhosis: impact of amino acid imbalance. J Gastroenterol. 2024;59(9):849–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets analyzed in the current study are not publicly available to ensure the privacy of research participants and comply with the regulations of the ethics approval. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


