Abstract
Polymer-grafted nanoparticles (PGNPs) are versatile hybrid materials whose properties critically depend on brush dimensions, uniformity, and grafting density. Herein, we systematically investigated how initiator density, catalyst concentration, and nanoparticle curvature govern the growth of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) brushes grafted from spherical SiO2 nanoparticles via surface-initiated activators regenerated by electron transfer atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ARGET ATRP). By tuning the initiator density through a combination of “active” and “dummy” silane initiators anchored on the nanoparticles’ surface and controlling the catalyst concentration, we reveal that increased initiator crowding and smaller surface curvature amplify steric hindrance, leading to decreased initiation efficiency and broader molecular weight distributions. Correlation with the corresponding unattached chains by ARGET ATRP suggests the presence of permanently inaccessible (“buried”) initiation sites, which are a characteristic of surface-grafted systems. At sufficient Cu catalyst concentrations, uniform brush growth is attained across different initiator densities, whereas decreased catalyst concentrations accentuate nonconcurrent initiation and propagation. These findings provide mechanistic insights into the interplay of initiator density, catalyst concentration, and surface curvature, offering design principles for tailoring the PGNP architecture. These results can guide the structural engineering of densely grafted surfaces, including nanoparticles and flat substrates, for applications in nanocomposites, photonics, and functional coatings.


Introduction
Polymer-grafted nanoparticles (PGNPs), also known as nanoparticle brushes, in which nanoparticles are densely grafted with polymer “canopies” via surface-initiated polymerizations, are regarded as versatile platforms for designing hybrid nanomaterials whose properties surpass those of classical polymer nanocomposites. − Chains with precisely controlled initiator density, molecular weight (and distribution), predetermined (co)polymer compositions, and macromolecular architecture can be grown from nanoscopic cores. This converts the poorly defined particle–matrix interface in classical “particle-in-polymer dispersions” into a chemically programmable domain, allowing the tailoring of interparticle interactions, dispersion, and nanoassembly. − Such a level of control enables the direct assembly of brush-modified nanoparticles into one-component hybrid materials with versatile property enhancements, such as mechanical toughening, − novel optical responses, − electrochemical stability, − and biofunctionality, − features that are difficult to realize through rule-of-mixture approaches.
Recent advances in nanoparticle surface modification and related polymer grafting methods have expanded the library of accessible PGNP architecture and assemblies. − For the “grafting-from” approach, surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP) has become preferential due to the high grafting density, preserved functionality of polymer chain ends, and compatibility with various functional groups and monomers. − For PGNPs, grafting density (σ, chains nm–2) represents a pivotal parameter defining the number of polymer chains grafted per unit surface area. , While high grafting density (σ > 0.3 chains nm–2) endows PGNPs with the ability to self-assemble into uniform and ordered structures, PGNPs with low grafting density (σ < 0.1 chains nm–2) exhibit segregation-driven interactions, which are exclusive for nanomaterials that require immobilized or oriented particles. Notably, the grafting density is tunable with the assistance of SI-ATRP: First, the capability of nanoparticles to graft polymer chains can be regulated by tuning the relative content of “active” and “dummy” ATRP initiators at the surface (i.e., surface modification reagents with and without reactive C–Br bonds, respectively). , Second, by reducing the amount of Cu-based catalyst during polymerization, intentional nonconcurrent initiation and nonuniform chain growth can lead to a lower grafting density.
A previous computational study revealed that the curvature effect of surfaces also influences the grafted polymers (in the following, the term “curvature” will be used as a synonym for the “principal curvature” of the surface of a sphere defined as 1/R where R is the particle radius). During grafting from the surface, the crowdedness among the chains hinders reactivation of a significant fraction of chain-ends, thereby causing these chains to remain permanently dormant (or, in a whimsical saying, “buried alive”). These “hindered dormant” chains, in contrast to “dead terminated” grafts (due to radical termination by combination or disproportionation), result in a relatively broader molecular weight distribution of the entire grafted brush layer. Moreover, as the radius of nanoparticles increases (i.e., decreasing surface curvature), this effect becomes more evident, with a larger amount of hindered dormant chains resulting in a broader chain length distribution. Experimentally, it is challenging to reproduce the predicted formation of hindered dormant chains using SI-ATRP with uniform chain growth, especially when applied to larger nanoparticles (considering the overall reaction system’s viscosity) and a small fraction of formed polymers available for size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) analysis. Being able to distinguish these hindered dormant chains would be of considerable significance for validating theoretical predictions and refining the mechanistic understanding. To the best of our knowledge, such an investigation has not yet been completed.
Herein, we systematically investigated the effect of the initiator density, catalyst concentration, and surface curvature on the growth of polymer brushes grafted from (spherical) nanoparticles. Despite the difficulty of deconvoluting hindered dormant chains in the molecular weight (distribution) curves, such an effect can be detected by forcing a nonuniform chain growth through a gradual decrease of Cu catalyst concentration. Three representative silica nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs) with distinct diameters (d) were studied: d small ≈ 15 nm, d medium ≈ 75 nm, and d large ≈ 110 nm. The initiator density was adjusted by applying different relative concentrations of “active” and “dummy” initiators for nanoparticle surface modification, while the actual grafting density was regulated by tuning the initial Cu catalyst content.
Surface grafting of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) brushes via surface-initiated activators regenerated by electron transfer (SI-ARGET) ATRP revealed that both a higher initiator density and a larger nanoparticle’s d increased chain crowding, thereby amplifying steric hindrance among grafted chains. This effect was reflected in a broader molecular weight distribution of the brush layers and a reduced initiation efficiency. Comparison with separately synthesized unattached polymers using a small-molecule initiator further confirmed the presence of permanently buried initiation sites. These findings advance the mechanistic understanding of polymer-grafted nanoparticles and provide valuable guidance for the structural and architectural design of densely polymer-grafted nanoparticles and flat surfaces.
Results and Discussion
Silica (SiO2) Surface Modifications and Initiator Density Regulation
Three representative colloidal SiO2 NP solutions with distinct diameters were used in this study (see the Experimental Section in the Supporting Information). Extensive prior studies have focused on the smallest SiO2 NPs (d ≈ 15.8 nm), whose surface functionalization involved tethering an excess of 3-(chlorodimethylsilyl)propyl α-bromoisobutyrate (Scheme S1 and Figure S1) as “active” ATRP initiators in methyl isobutyl ketone. − Following surface modification and purification, three model SI-ARGET ATRP reactions were conducted, grafting PMMA from these nanoparticles under conditions with 200 ppm of Cu catalyst relative to MMA, a level sufficient to achieve well-controlled particle brushes. The model “surface bromide density” of the resulting SiO2-g-PMMA was calculated (eqs and S1–S4). This value, referred to as the initiator density (σin), was estimated to be approximately 0.7 Br nm–2.
| 1 |
where f inorg denotes the inorganic fraction of SiO2-g-PMMA measured by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) in air; N A is Avogadro’s constant; ρ is the density of SiO2; d indicates the SiO2 core diameter; and M n is the number-average molecular weight of the grafted PMMA, determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC).
The spacing between surface-bound initiators was further regulated by anchoring a mixture of “active” and “dummy” silane initiators (Figure a). The “dummy” initiator, chlorodimethylsilane, serves only to occupy surface sites without the capability of initiating polymerization. By systematically varying the molar ratio of these two species, σin was scaled proportionally, yielding values of approximately 0.4, 0.1, and 0.03 Br nm–2. This result aligns with expectations, as each silane reagent is monofunctional, allowing the direct control of the initiator spacing through stoichiometry.
1.
Schematic illustration of regulating (a,b) initiator density (σin, Br nm–2) and (c) grafting density (σ, chains nm–2) in polymer-grafted nanoparticles.
For the larger SiO2 NPs (d ≈ 75 and 110 nm), a different surface modification strategy was employed to account for their distinct sample dispersion environments (Figure b). Since chlorosilanes readily react with alcohols, 3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl α-bromoisobutyrate (Figure S2) was selected as the active initiator, while triethoxyhexylsilane served as the dummy initiator for tuning initiator spacing. The solvents (methyl ethyl ketone for 75 nm and isopropyl alcohol for 110 nm, respectively) of the bare SiO2 dispersions were completely exchanged into ethanol, a protic medium that facilitates efficient hydrolysis and condensation reactions. Subsequently, (mixed) silane reagents were anchored to the nanoparticle surfaces under basic conditions (see the Supporting Information for details). The modified particles were then purified by repeated high-speed centrifugation (12,000 rpm, 30 min) to remove unbound initiators and dried under ambient conditions, yielding SiO2–Br macroinitiators for SI-ARGET ATRP studies.
To accurately quantify the σin for the larger SiO2–Br NPs, the core diameters of SiO2-g-PMMA after model SI-ARGET ATRP reactions were measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a random sampling approach (Figure S3, Table S1 for 75 nm, and Figure S4, Table S2 for 110 nm, respectively). Representative TEM images revealed that most of the SiO2 cores retained a spherical morphology, regardless of their size (Figure ). However, the 75 nm SiO2 NPs displayed a broader size distribution and some core aggregations prior to surface modification, compared to the more uniform 15 and 110 nm samples. The average core diameters were determined to be 73.3 ± 19.6 and 111.4 ± 5.0 nm for the two larger particle types, and these values were used for estimating σin. As the 15 and 110 nm SiO2 NPs exhibited relatively narrow size distributions, subsequent comparisons of the resulting polymer brush layers were expected to yield empirically grounded trends.
2.

TEM images of SiO2-g-PMMA with SiO2 core diameters of approximately (a) 15 nm (scale bar 50 nm), (b) 75 nm (scale bar 200 nm), and (c) 110 nm (scale bar 500 nm). Inset: corresponding size distributions determined by random sampling from multiple nanoparticles.
For 75 and 110 nm SiO2 prepared exclusively with active initiators, σin was approximately 0.7 Br nm–2, consistent with that of 15 nm SiO2 NPs. However, when using mixed silanes with a molar ratio of active/dummy initiators of 40/30, σin was around 0.5 Br nm–2, which was slightly higher in comparison to that of the 15 nm SiO2 analog. This was attributed to the trifunctional nature of the silanes, which can provide multiple linkages, thus, providing stronger initiator anchoring and stability.
Surface-Initiated ATRP and Grafting Density Regulation
SI-ARGET ATRP was employed to grow PMMA brushes from the surface-modified SiO2–Br, − starting with the 15 nm diameter particles. Polymerizations were conducted in homogeneous dispersions using anisole as a solvent, while limiting the overall monomer conversion (<10%) to minimize interparticle brush coupling and avoid macroscopic gelation. , Monomer conversion was estimated using a gravimetric method, coupled with the variation of inorganic fraction determined by TGA (eqs S5–S17 and Table S3). The initial monomer-to-macroinitiator ratio was fixed at [MMA]0/[SiO2–Br]0 = 5000:1. This means that for SiO2–Br with lower σin, a larger amount of SiO2–Br was introduced to maintain a constant total initiator concentration in the reaction mixture. The absolute molecular weight (M n,abs) and molecular weight distribution (M w/M n) of grafted PMMA were determined by GPC after cleaving the polymers from the SiO2 cores using hydrofluoric acid, followed by neutralization with aqueous ammonia and collection of the cleaved PMMA from the THF phase.
Previous studies have shown that both the M w/M n of grafted brushes and the σ of PGNPs can be tuned by adjusting the initial concentration of Cu catalyst ([CuIIBr2]0). As the Cu catalyst influences both initiation and activation/deactivation of propagating chains in ATRP, in this series of experiments, [CuIIBr2]0 was decreased by about 3-fold (half the order of magnitude) between successive polymerizations (Figure c). Lower catalyst concentrations resulted in less efficient initiation (due to slower deactivation) and nonuniform brush growth, − which both reduced σ. The polymerizations were performed on SiO2–Br with four distinct initiator densities (σin = 0.7, 0.4, 0.1, and 0.03 Br nm–2). To mitigate oxygen inhibition, particularly critical at ultralow [CuIIBr2]0 (e.g., 1 and 0.3 ppm relative to monomer), a constant concentration of reducing agent – tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate (Sn(Oct)2) was included in the reaction mixtures (used in an excess).
PMMA Grafting from 15 nm SiO2–Br with Varied Initiator Density
Following SI-ARGET ATRP from 15 nm SiO2–Br, the resulting SiO2-g-PMMA samples were comprehensively characterized (Table ). The measured parameters included M n,abs and M w/M n of the grafted PMMA by GPC analysis, inorganic weight fraction (f inorg) determined by TGA, as well as the calculated grafting density (σ) and initiation efficiency (I eff).
1. SiO2-g-PMMA (d silica ≈ 15 nm) Prepared via SI-ARGET ATRP with Varied Initiator Density and Cu Catalyst Concentration.
| entry
|
M n,abs (×103) | M w/M n | f inorg (%) | σ (chains nm–2) | I eff (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d (nm) | σin (Br nm–2) | [CuIIBr2]0 (ppm) | |||||
| 15 | 0.7 | 100 | 20.4 | 1.23 | 21 | 0.662 | 95 |
| 15 | 0.7 | 30 | 53.4 | 1.15 | 10 | 0.565 | 81 |
| 15 | 0.7 | 10 | 53.2 | 1.19 | 12 | 0.496 | 71 |
| 15 | 0.7 | 3 | 41.7 | 1.20 | 16 | 0.434 | 62 |
| 15 | 0.7 | 1 | 77.2 | 1.66 | 17 | 0.224 | 32 |
| 15 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 190.3 | 2.43 | 24 | 0.060 | 9 |
| 15 | 0.4 | 100 | 23.3 | 1.18 | 27 | 0.406 | 102 |
| 15 | 0.4 | 30 | 39.9 | 1.18 | 17 | 0.427 | 107 |
| 15 | 0.4 | 10 | 60.6 | 1.20 | 14 | 0.340 | 85 |
| 15 | 0.4 | 3 | 86.6 | 1.66 | 26 | 0.113 | 28 |
| 15 | 0.4 | 1 | 240.8 | 2.32 | 31 | 0.032 | 8 |
| 15 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 234.2 | 2.56 | 30 | 0.034 | 8 |
| 15 | 0.1 | 100 | 47.8 | 1.13 | 44 | 0.093 | 93 |
| 15 | 0.1 | 30 | 40.8 | 1.19 | 54 | 0.073 | 73 |
| 15 | 0.1 | 10 | 44.6 | 1.16 | 47 | 0.087 | 87 |
| 15 | 0.1 | 3 | 25.6 | 1.26 | 83 | 0.027 | 27 |
| 15 | 0.1 | 1 | 65.8 | 1.72 | 77 | 0.016 | 16 |
| 15 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 231.2 | 2.29 | 78 | 0.004 | 4 |
| 15 | 0.03 | 100 | 51.1 | 1.10 | 70 | 0.030 | 99 |
| 15 | 0.03 | 30 | 37.2 | 1.23 | 79 | 0.026 | 86 |
| 15 | 0.03 | 10 | 34.7 | 1.25 | 87 | 0.015 | 51 |
| 15 | 0.03 | 3 | 35.1 | 1.57 | 94 | 0.006 | 21 |
| 15 | 0.03 | 1 | 87.0 | 2.33 | 91 | 0.004 | 13 |
| 15 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 253.6 | 2.61 | 84 | 0.003 | 9 |
Reaction conditions: MMA 3 mL (50 vol % in anisole), [MMA]0/[15 nm SiO2–Br]0/[Sn(Oct)2] = 5000:1:3, [CuIIBr2]0/[Me6TREN]0 = 1:5, CuIIBr2 (stock solutions in N,N-dimethylformamide, DMF) 100/30/10/3/1/0.3 ppm (relative to MMA).
Absolute molecular weight and molecular weight distribution determined by THF GPC using PMMA standards.
Inorganic weight fraction determined by TGA under air.
Grafting density calculated using eq .
Initiation efficiency calculated as σ/σin.
Besides the Cu catalyst concentration, the initiator spacing also influenced the σ of SiO2-g-PMMA (Figure a). For SiO2–Br with the highest initiator density (σin = 0.7 Br nm–2), σ decreased continuously as [CuIIBr2]0 was lowered, consistent with previous reports on grafting density regulation. When the initiator spacing was slightly increased (σin = 0.4 Br nm–2), these SiO2–Br exhibited tolerance to reduced Cu levels, maintaining σ ≈ 0.4 chains nm–2 at 30 ppm of Cu. This stabilizing effect became more pronounced for σin = 0.1 Br nm–2, where σ remained at 0.087 chains nm–2 even at 10 ppm of Cu. For the smallest initiator coverage (σin = 0.03 Br nm–2), σ still showed relative resistance to decreasing [CuIIBr2]0, although with a gradual decline from an already low baseline. These observations suggested that at lower σin, the reduced Cu levels may still satisfy the minimum requirements for controlled polymerization and uniform brush growth. At lower σin, the larger average spacing (thus a lower steric hindrance) between initiation sites could enhance the probability of successful initiation and subsequent propagation within the available reaction volume, even when catalyst levels are reduced and the overall initiation is less concurrent.
3.
PMMA grafting from SiO2–Br nanoparticles (d small ≈ 15 nm) via SI-ARGET ATRP at varied initiator density (σin) and initial Cu catalyst concentrations ([CuIIBr2]0). Plotted parameters include: (a) grafting density (σ) and (b) initiation efficiency (I eff) as functions of [CuIIBr2]0. Dashed lines are included to guide the eye, representing (a) the designated σin of SiO2–Br and (b) the 100% initiation efficiency threshold (black) for samples prepared under identical [CuIIBr2]0 (gray).
Unlike polymerizations targeting unattached chains, where I eff is typically estimated by comparing theoretical and measured molecular weights, I eff of SiO2-g-PMMA can be approximated as the ratio of the polymer grafting density to initiator density, σ/σin (Figure b). This definition compares the surface density of successfully grafted polymer chains to the surface bromide density of the corresponding SiO2–Br macroinitiator, with the latter estimated from a model SI-ARGET ATRP experiment conducted under conditions affording near-quantitative initiation. At 100 ppm of Cu, all samples exhibited I eff nearly 100%, indicating that SI-ARGET ATRP proceeded in a well-controlled manner with nearly complete initiator activation. As [CuIIBr2]0 decreased, the average I eff followed a declining trend, reaching a value as low as ∼7% at 0.3 ppm of Cu (Figure S5). This decrease suggested that a sufficient concentration of Cu catalyst is critical for achieving the concurrent initiation of surface-anchored initiators. Insufficient catalyst contents led to nonconcurrent initiation and poor deactivation caused by the excess reducing agent, which in turn resulted in inaccessible surface bromides likely due to steric interference from surrounding, already-growing polymer chains.
The M w/M n for both unattached chains and polymer brushes grafted from nanoparticles plays a key role in determining the physical properties and assembly behavior of polymeric materials. − For unattached chains synthesized by (ideal) ATRP, neglecting termination, M w/M n can be estimated from
| 2 |
where DPn is the degree of polymerization, [R–X]0 is the initial alkyl halide concentration, and k p and k d are the rate coefficients for propagation and deactivation, respectively.
As expected, the M w/M n of grafted PMMA increased as [CuIIBr2]0 decreased (Figure a). At 100 ppm of Cu, where SI-ARGET ATRP was well-controlled, both high- and low-σin samples exhibited uniform brush growth (M w/M n ≤ 1.23). Remarkably, this narrow M w/M n was maintained even at 10 ppm of Cu, despite the concurrent decline in σ. This indicates that while initiation became less efficient, chain growth remained uniform. According to eq , the persistence of low M w/M n values stems from a relatively small [R–Br]0/[CuIIBr(Ligand)] ratio. For grafted brushes, the observed decrease in I eff at 10 ppm of Cu implies that sterically hindered initiation or propagation sites likely became inaccessible under reduced Cu levels. At lower [CuIIBr2]0, the “effective” alkyl bromide concentration [R–Br] decreased, meaning that each active chain end is paired with a higher proportion of Cu. This behavior contrasts sharply with polymerizations of unattached chains, where [R–Br] remains constant by using a small-molecule initiator. Such observations highlight a fundamental mechanistic distinction between grafting-from and the corresponding processes of unattached systems and may suggest a new approach for the M w/M n control in surface-initiated polymerizations.
4.
PMMA grafting from SiO2–Br nanoparticles (d small ≈ 15 nm) via SI-ARGET ATRP at varied initiator density (σin) and initial Cu catalyst concentrations ([CuIIBr2]0). (a) Molecular weight distribution (M w/M n) as a function of [CuIIBr2]0. Dashed lines are included to guide the eye, representing samples prepared under identical [CuIIBr2]0. (b) Schematic illustration of asymmetry factor calculation. (c) Asymmetry factor (A f,area) as a function of [CuIIBr2]0. (d–g) Normalized GPC curves of weight-average molecular weight (M w) for SiO2-g-PMMA with σin = (d) 0.7, (e) 0.4, (f) 0.1, and (g) 0.03 Br nm–2. In each panel, [CuIIBr2]0 was systematically decreased (100/30/10/3/1/0.3 ppm relative to the monomer) from top to bottom.
Given that all polymerizations were stopped at low conversions, the observed brush uniformity with sufficient Cu (at 100 ppm) was unexpected (eq ). This was likely due to the localized nature of the surface-anchored initiators with the SiO2 core providing a spatially consistent template for ATRP initiation. Interestingly, at 100 ppm of Cu, brush uniformity improved as σin decreased: M w/M n fell from 1.23 (at σin = 0.7 Br nm–2) to 1.10 (at σin = 0.03 Br nm–2). This trend suggests that at higher initiator density with sufficient Cu, crowding during propagation may introduce steric hindrance, resulting in a slightly broader M w/M n. Nevertheless, this effect was absent at lower [CuIIBr2]0, where reduced control resulted in higher average M w/M n values and greater variability among samples prepared at the same Cu catalyst concentration (Figure S6).
Beyond the M w/M n values, the shape parameters of the M w/M n, including its skewness and kurtosis, provide additional insights into the characteristics of grafted polymers. To empirically assess the distribution asymmetry, an asymmetry factor based on the integrated area (A f,area) was calculated by dividing the area to the left and right of the peak position of the weight-average molecular weight distribution (Figure b). Values of A f,area > 1 indicate that the distribution is skewed toward higher molecular weight (MW), with a pronounced low-molecular-weight tailing. Representative curves of weight (M w, Figure d–g) and number-average molecular weight (M n, Figure S7) distributions were determined by THF GPC, respectively.
For SiO2-g-PMMA with 15 nm cores, all samples exhibited A f,area > 1, indicating a greater fraction of polymers with MW lower than the peak position (Figure c). At 100 ppm of Cu, all SiO2-g-PMMA samples with different σin displayed similar asymmetry factors of ∼1.5, suggesting an intrinsically asymmetric growth profile under sufficient Cu catalyst conditions. As [CuIIBr2]0 decreased, a V-shaped dependence of A f,area was observed for all σin, with optimal symmetry reached at 3 ppm of Cu (Figure S8).
When the Cu level was reduced to 0.3 ppm, the skewness increased again, resulting in a pronounced low-molecular-weight tail. This phenomenon can be attributed to the following factors. (1) The excessive amount of reducing agent (600 ppm of Sn(Oct)2 versus 0.3 ppm of Cu) likely led to negligible content of Cu(II) deactivators, resulting in over-reduction and insufficient deactivation. (2) Under ultralow σ < 0.06 chains nm–2, where effectively initiated sites are particularly scarce, a fraction of chains remained continuously active and propagated within a larger free volume, whereas the other polymer grafts became terminated. Evidence for this lies in the more pronounced skewness observed at lower σin, where only ∼2 chains per particle were grafted (σ = 0.003 chains nm–2 for σin = 0.03 Br nm–2 at 0.3 ppm of Cu).
PMMA Grafting from 75 and 110 nm SiO2–Br with Varied Initiator Density
The specific surface area of a spherical nanoparticle decreases with increasing d, meaning that SiO2–Br with larger d provides fewer surface bromides under the same mass. Maintaining constant [SiO2–Br]0 under these conditions would require substantially higher macroinitiator loadings. To mitigate the resulting viscosity of the SI-ARGET ATRP system, PMMA grafting from larger SiO2–Br was therefore conducted at a lower initiator concentration ([MMA]0/[SiO2–Br]0 = 9000:1), while keeping all other reaction conditions constant. The reduced [SiO2–Br]0 was maintained above 100 ppm relative to the monomer concentration, thereby preventing the decrease in grafting density that was observed at lower initiator loadings. The resulting 75 and 110 nm SiO2-g-PMMA samples were comprehensively characterized, with the results summarized in Table .
2. SiO2-g-PMMA (d silica ≈ 75 and 110 nm) Prepared via SI-ARGET ATRP with Varied Initiator Density and Cu Catalyst Concentration.
| entry
|
M n,abs (×103) | M w/M n | f inorg (%) | σ (chains nm–2) | I eff (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d (nm) | σin (Br nm–2) | [CuIIBr2]0 (ppm) | |||||
| 75 | 0.7 | 100 | 40.0 | 1.22 | 40 | 0.615 | 88 |
| 75 | 0.7 | 30 | 62.7 | 1.20 | 30 | 0.615 | 88 |
| 75 | 0.7 | 10 | 52.3 | 1.29 | 37 | 0.518 | 74 |
| 75 | 0.7 | 3 | 65.3 | 1.59 | 40 | 0.370 | 53 |
| 75 | 0.7 | 1 | 135.0 | 2.78 | 49 | 0.123 | 18 |
| 75 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 52.9 | 4.12 | 79 | 0.081 | 12 |
| 75 | 0.5 | 100 | 37.9 | 1.23 | 48 | 0.470 | 94 |
| 75 | 0.5 | 30 | 46.0 | 1.28 | 43 | 0.476 | 95 |
| 75 | 0.5 | 10 | 36.8 | 1.32 | 56 | 0.351 | 70 |
| 75 | 0.5 | 3 | 77.7 | 2.04 | 51 | 0.202 | 40 |
| 75 | 0.5 | 1 | 127.6 | 2.04 | 52 | 0.116 | 23 |
| 75 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 73.5 | 4.09 | 68 | 0.104 | 21 |
| 110 | 0.7 | 100 | 39.4 | 1.26 | 49 | 0.646 | 92 |
| 110 | 0.7 | 30 | 29.7 | 1.23 | 62 | 0.509 | 73 |
| 110 | 0.7 | 10 | 37.2 | 1.34 | 58 | 0.474 | 68 |
| 110 | 0.7 | 3 | 41.4 | 1.41 | 65 | 0.325 | 46 |
| 110 | 0.7 | 1 | 72.8 | 2.30 | 60 | 0.221 | 32 |
| 110 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 112.1 | 2.87 | 72 | 0.085 | 12 |
| 110 | 0.5 | 100 | 51.7 | 1.30 | 49 | 0.491 | 98 |
| 110 | 0.5 | 30 | 59.9 | 1.28 | 44 | 0.524 | 105 |
| 110 | 0.5 | 10 | 54.0 | 1.37 | 51 | 0.446 | 89 |
| 110 | 0.5 | 3 | 74.8 | 1.70 | 58 | 0.241 | 48 |
| 110 | 0.5 | 1 | 132.4 | 2.54 | 59 | 0.128 | 26 |
| 110 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 55.8 | 3.12 | 77 | 0.131 | 26 |
Reaction condition: MMA 3 mL (50 vol % in anisole), [MMA]0/[75 or 110 nm SiO2–Br]0/[Sn(Oct)2] = 9000:1:5.4, [CuIIBr2]0/[Me6TREN]0 = 1:5, CuIIBr2 (stock solutions in DMF) 100/30/10/3/1/0.3 ppm (relative to MMA).
Absolute molecular weight and molecular weight distribution determined by THF GPC using PMMA standards.
Inorganic weight fraction determined by TGA under air.
Grafting density calculated using eq .
Initiation efficiency calculated as σ/σin.
Compared to PMMA grafted from a 15 nm SiO2 analogue, a similar decrease was observed in the grafting density of SiO2-g-PMMA with varied σin as [CuIIBr2]0 decreased (Figure a). For larger SiO2–Br (for both d = 75 and 110 nm) with the highest σin of 0.7 Br nm–2, σ decreased continuously as the Cu catalyst concentration was lowered. When the initiator spacing slightly increased (σin = 0.5 Br nm–2), the nanoparticles exhibited tolerance to reduced Cu concentrations: σ remained ∼0.5 chains nm–2 at 30 ppm of Cu before gradually declining at lower [CuIIBr2]0. All samples exhibited ∼90% I eff at 100 ppm of Cu (Figure b). In contrast, as [CuIIBr2]0 decreased, the average I eff declined, consistent with the trend observed for the 15 nm SiO2–Br system. Notably, when more than 10 ppm of Cu was applied in the reaction mixture, SiO2–Br of the same size but with larger initiator spacing (σin = 0.5 Br nm–2) displayed an overall higher I eff compared to their denser counterparts (σin = 0.7 Br nm–2). This suggests that increasing initiator spacing (and thereby reducing site crowding) can mitigate steric hindrance from the surrounding chains, leading to a modest improvement in I eff even under conditions of nonconcurrent initiation.
5.
PMMA grafting from SiO2–Br nanoparticles (d medium ≈ 75 nm and d large ≈ 110 nm) via SI-ARGET ATRP at varied initiator density (σin) and initial Cu catalyst concentrations ([CuIIBr2]0). Plotted parameters include: (a) grafting density (σ), (b) initiation efficiency (I eff), (c) molecular weight distribution (M w/M n), and (d) asymmetry factor (A f,area) as functions of [CuIIBr2]0. Dashed lines are included to guide the eye, representing (a) the designated σin of SiO2–Br, (b) the 100% initiation efficiency threshold (black), and (b,c) samples prepared under identical [CuIIBr2]0 (gray). The asterisks in (d) denote A f,area values that include contributions from continuously propagated chains without deactivation.
The overall M w/M n of grafted PMMA increased as [CuIIBr2]0 decreased (Figure c). When Cu levels above 10 ppm were applied, SiO2–Br with the largest d of 110 nm exhibited higher M w/M n values compared to the 75 nm analog. This effect is attributed to reduced surface curvature at larger particle sizes, which increases the chain crowdedness and compromises brush length uniformity. Notably, under these conditions, SiO2–Br with a larger initiator spacing (σin = 0.5 Br nm–2) displayed broader molecular weight distributions, in contrast to the behavior observed for 15 nm SiO2–Br at 100 ppm of Cu. A plausible explanation considers both I eff and the constant initial bromide concentration across the reactions. SiO2–Br with σin = 0.5 Br nm–2 illustrates a higher I eff, thereby increasing the effective concentration of alkyl bromide during the propagation stage. Consequently, the available Cu catalyst is distributed across a greater number of chain ends, reducing the catalyst-to-chain ratio and resulting in a broader M w/M n.
When [CuIIBr2]0 decreased below 3 ppm, M w/M n increased significantly, with the effect most pronounced at the ultralow level of 0.3 ppm. Although it is barely apparent in the M n data (Figure S9), GPC traces of the PMMA brush layers revealed bimodal distributions, with a secondary population of much longer chains than those in the principal peak (Figure ). At such low [CuIIBr2]0, the large excess of reducing agent likely reduced nearly all CuIIBr2 deactivator species, resulting in very poor deactivation and leaving most propagating chain ends continuously active. In addition, the broad M w/M n combined with low grafting density likely contributed to brush inhomogeneity (especially for 75 nm SiO2-g-PMMA with broad d distribution), further increasing M w/M n and driving the final values above 4.
6.
Normalized GPC analysis of the weight-average molecular weight (M w) of PMMA grafting from SiO2–Br, with diameter and σin of (a) 75 nm, σin = 0.7 Br nm–2, (b) 75 nm, σin = 0.5 Br nm–2, (c) 110 nm, σin = 0.7 Br nm–2, and (d) 110 nm, σin = 0.5 Br nm–2. In each panel (from top to bottom), [CuIIBr2]0 was systematically decreased (100/30/10/3/1/0.3 ppm relative to monomer) for polymerizations.
At sufficient Cu levels, SiO2-g-PMMA with larger core sizes exhibited higher A f,area values, attributable to an increased chain crowding (Figure d). For SiO2–Br with a larger size (lower surface curvature), the densely packed chains were expected to generate a pronounced steric hindrance. As [CuIIBr2]0 decreased, A f,area generally followed a downward trend. In this regime, sterically hindered chains propagated less efficiently, whereas unconfined chains continued to grow, leading to A f,area approaching unity at ∼3 ppm. However, under ultralow Cu conditions (1 and 0.3 ppm), the bimodal molecular weight distributions arising from inhomogeneity were also included in the A f,area calculation, making such values less representative.
Comparison of SiO2-g-PMMA with Different Curvatures and Unattached PMMA
To compare the chain growth of SiO2-g-PMMA of varied surface curvature with that of unattached polymer chains, ARGET ATRP was conducted using ethyl α-bromoisobutyrate (EBiB) as the small-molecule initiator at a diluted monomer concentration (20 vol % in anisole). The [CuIIBr2]0 level was systematically varied, and the reactions were quenched at relatively low monomer conversions. The resulting unattached PMMA samples were characterized, including GPC analysis (Figure S10), and the results are summarized in Table .
3. Unattached PMMA Prepared via ARGET ATRP under the Varied Cu Catalyst Concentration.
| entry | [CuIIBr2]0 (ppm) | conv (%) | M n,theo (×103) | M n,abs (×103) | M w/M n | I eff (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L-100 | 100 | 9.8 | 49.1 | 54.0 | 1.35 | 91 |
| L-30 | 30 | 8.7 | 44.0 | 50.0 | 1.35 | 88 |
| L-10 | 10 | 9.4 | 47.3 | 59.0 | 1.49 | 80 |
| L-3 | 3 | 11.8 | 59.3 | 81.7 | 1.71 | 73 |
| L-1 | 1 | 3.0 | 15.3 | 17.7 | 1.80 | 87 |
| L-0.3 | 0.3 | 7.1 | 35.8 | 40.2 | 1.92 | 89 |
Reaction condition: MMA 1.2 mL (20 vol % in anisole), [MMA]0/[EBiB]0/[Sn(Oct)2] = 5000:1:3, [CuIIBr2]0/[Me6TREN]0 = 1:5, CuIIBr2 (stock solutions in DMF) 100/30/10/3/1/0.3 ppm (relative to MMA).
Monomer conversion roughly estimated gravimetrically (eqs S5–S15).
Theoretical molecular weight was calculated as M n,theo = conv × 5000 × 100.12 + 195.05; where 195.05 corresponds to the molecular weight of EBiB.
Absolute molecular weight and molecular weight distribution determined by THF GPC using PMMA standards.
Initiation efficiency calculated as M n,theo/M n,abs.
Comparisons were made between unattached PMMA and all SiO2-g-PMMA samples with the highest initiator density (σin = 0.7 Br nm–2). A very pronounced difference is observed in their initiation efficiencies (Figure a). Even at low monomer conversions (<12%), unattached PMMA displayed I eff values above 80%. Given sufficient reaction time, nearly all EBiB molecules should initiate, even as [CuIIBr2]0 decreased. In contrast, the I eff of SiO2-g-PMMA consistently decreased with a reduced Cu level. Slow initiation and nonuniform chain growth left a substantial fraction of initiating sites permanently buried, screened by already growing chains, and inaccessible to be activated during polymerization.
7.

PMMA characteristics comparison of SiO2-g-PMMA with different surface curvatures and unattached PMMA via (SI-) ARGET ATRP at varied initial Cu catalyst concentrations ([CuIIBr2]0). Plotted parameters include: (a) initiation efficiency (I eff), (b) molecular weight distribution (M w/M n), and (c) asymmetry factor (A f,area) as functions of [CuIIBr2]0. Dashed lines are included to guide the eye, representing (a) the 100% initiation efficiency threshold. The asterisks in (c) denote A f,area values (of 75 and 110 nm SiO2-g-PMMA samples) that include contributions from continuously propagated chains without deactivation.
The effect of [CuIIBr2]0 on M w/M n for these systems is shown in Figure b. When [CuIIBr2]0 was above 10 ppm, unattached PMMA exhibited the highest values of M w/M n, likely due to more pronounced termination and the continuous generation of new chains, resulting from slow initiation. The grafted PMMA brushes had narrower M w/M n because the generation of new chains was prevented by the population of already growing chains, which screened the buried initiation sites. The M w/M n of chains grown from the smallest particles (d ≈ 15 nm) was the lowest. However, the M w/M n values of polymers grown from the nanoparticles at the lowest [CuIIBr2]0 significantly increased. This could be due to the continuous reduction of Cu deactivators by Sn(Oct)2 used at large excess (600 ppm, thereby ca. 1000 fold excess over CuIIBr2/ligand). Thus, after a certain time, there were no deactivators available to control polymerization and uncontrolled polymers with broad or even bimodal distributions and molecular weights in the range of millions were formed. Interestingly, unattached polymers had narrower M w/M n because they were at a higher concentration (higher I eff) and could more efficiently “regenerate” CuIIBr2(ligand) deactivators by radical termination. This could also suggest that termination for SI-ARGET ATRP could be suppressed due to the segregation of radially growing chains attached to the particles. A low nanoparticle concentration, resulting in large interparticle distances, together with a higher surface curvature, which increases the radially spatial separation of growing chains, can further reduce the probability of termination. The relatively high and constant concentration of Sn(Oct)2 was needed to overcome residual oxygen, but plausibly, the more careful deoxygenation and lower [Sn(Oct)2] could extend control of SI-ARGET ATRP to sub-ppm catalyst level.
The asymmetry factor, A f,area, decreased with diminishing [CuIIBr2]0, although differences among SiO2-g-PMMA were less discernible (Figure c). For unattached PMMA, A f,area remained the highest when [CuIIBr2]0 exceeded 1 ppm, probably due to a combination of increased termination and continuous initiation from EBiB. The former phenomenon may arise from the higher probability of encountering two propagating macroradicals, in contrast to the spatially localized, surface-bound, and radially propagating radicals for SiO2-g-PMMA. The latter effect reflects the continuous generation of new chains during polymerization, which contributed to larger A f,area values. It should be noted that distinguishing whether the low MW fraction (A L as in Figure b) originates from early termination or continuous initiation remains challenging. It will require more elaborate experimental or theoretical approaches in future studies. Collectively, these observations highlight the unique features of surface-initiated systems and underscore the role of steric hindrance in governing chain growth from SiO2–Br macroinitiators.
Conclusions
This study systematically elucidated how initiator spacing, Cu catalyst concentration, and nanoparticle curvature govern the chain growth and uniformity of PMMA brushes grafted from spherical SiO2 nanoparticles via SI-ARGET ATRP. By tuning the initiator density (via mixed active and dummy ATRP initiators), varying the Cu catalyst concentration, and applying SiO2–Br macroinitiators with three distinct diameters, we demonstrated that increased initiator density and reduced surface curvature amplify steric hindrance among the grafted chains, leading to decreased initiation efficiency and broader molecular weight distributions.
Notably, comparisons with unattached PMMA using small-molecule initiators confirmed the presence of permanently buried inaccessible initiation sites, which are unique to surface-initiated systems (as previously postulated by means of simulations). Detailed investigations revealed that, under a sufficient Cu catalyst level (100 ppm relative to monomer), brush growth remained uniform across both high and low initiator densities, whereas lower catalyst concentrations accentuated nonconcurrent initiation and propagation. The “hindered dormant” effect of grafted brushes was primarily observed when the Cu level exceeded 10 ppm; below 3 ppm, however, this effect was likely masked by the excess reducing agent, which caused over-reduction and poor deactivation. While the excess reducing agent was introduced to mitigate residual oxygen, its optimization could enable future efforts toward ATRP under sub-ppm catalyst concentrations. Furthermore, the distinction between surface-grafted systems and the polymerization of unattached PMMA chains underscored the need for refined theoretical descriptions of M w/M n in polymer brushes growing from surfaces, particularly those accounting for sterically hindered or dormant sites.
Overall, these findings enhance the mechanistic understanding of polymer-grafted nanoparticles and provide design principles for tailoring brush uniformity through the control of the initiator density, catalyst concentration, and nanoparticle curvature. Such insights are expected to guide the structural and architectural engineering of densely grafted (nanoparticle) surfaces for applications in nanocomposites, photonics, and functional coatings.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the support from Dr. Jirameth (Mett) Tarnsangpradit and Ting-Chih (Tina) Lin. Financial support from NSF (DMR 2202747, DMR 2209587) and the Department of Energy (DE-SC0018784) is gratefully acknowledged.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.macromol.5c02737.
Experimental procedures; grafting density derivation; 1H NMR spectroscopy; TEM images, characterization results, and GPC analysis of PMMA-grafted SiO2 nanoparticles (PDF)
The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. R.Y. with the assistance of H.W., X.H., and K.K. completed the synthesis and characterizations. K.K. assisted in schematic diagram visualization. F.L., D.R.D., E.M.B, and M.R.B provided support on result interpretation. K.M. conceived and organized the project, and together with R.Y. wrote the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Yan J., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K.. Brush-modified materials: Control of molecular architecture, assembly behavior, properties and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2020;100:101180. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S. K., Jouault N., Benicewicz B., Neely T.. Nanocomposites with Polymer Grafted Nanoparticles. Macromolecules. 2013;46(9):3199–3214. doi: 10.1021/ma4001385. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jayaraman A.. Polymer grafted nanoparticles: Effect of chemical and physical heterogeneity in polymer grafts on particle assembly and dispersion. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2013;51(7):524–534. doi: 10.1002/polb.23260. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zoppe J. O., Ataman N. C., Mocny P., Wang J., Moraes J., Klok H.-A.. Surface-Initiated Controlled Radical Polymerization: State-of-the-Art, Opportunities, and Challenges in Surface and Interface Engineering with Polymer Brushes. Chem. Rev. 2017;117(3):1105–1318. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hore M. J. A.. Polymers on nanoparticles: structure & dynamics. Soft Matter. 2019;15(6):1120–1134. doi: 10.1039/C8SM02110D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yi C., Yang Y., Liu B., He J., Nie Z.. Polymer-guided assembly of inorganic nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020;49(2):465–508. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00725C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hore M. J. A., Korley L. T. J., Kumar S. K.. Polymer-Grafted Nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2020;128(3):030401. doi: 10.1063/5.0019326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hueckel T., Luo X., Aly O. F., Macfarlane R. J.. Nanoparticle Brushes: Macromolecular Ligands for Materials Synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023;56(14):1931–1941. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pavón C., Benetti E. M., Lorandi F.. Polymer Brushes on Nanoparticles for Controlling the Interaction with Protein-Rich Physiological Media. Langmuir. 2024;40(23):11843–11857. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos P. J., Cheung T. C., Macfarlane R. J.. Assembling Ordered Crystals with Disperse Building Blocks. Nano Lett. 2019;19(8):5774–5780. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Lee J., Wang Z., Zhao Y., Yan J., Lin Y., Li S., Liu T., Olszewski M., Pietrasik J., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K.. Tunable Assembly of Block Copolymer Tethered Particle Brushes by Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 2020;9(6):806–812. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu W., Singh M., Zhai Y., Masud A., Tonny W., Yuan C., Yin R., Al-Enizi A. M., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K., Douglas J. F., Karim A.. Facile Entropy-Driven Segregation of Imprinted Polymer-Grafted Nanoparticle Brush Blends by Solvent Vapor Annealing Soft Lithography. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14(40):45765–45774. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c11134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu M., Tan Z., Baek G., Stein G. E., Yun H., Kim B. J.. 3D Assembly of Polymer-Grafted Nanoparticles: Soft Confinement for Structural Diversity. Macromolecules. 2025;58(5):2178–2191. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02709. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kang M., Lin P.-A., Bunch J. A., Lipomi D. J., Arya G., Cohen S. M.. Impact of Grafting Density on the Assembly and Mechanical Properties of Self-Assembled Metal–Organic Framework Monolayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(8):6966–6973. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c17748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin R., Zhao Y., Jeong J., Tarnsangpradit J., Liu T., An S. Y., Zhai Y., Hu X., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K.. Composition-Orientation Induced Mechanical Synergy in Nanoparticle Brushes with Grafted Gradient Copolymers. Macromolecules. 2023;56(23):9626–9635. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu H., Shi Y., Lin T.-C., Abdullah A., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K.. Accelerated Self-Healing and Property Recovery in Brush Particle Solids Featuring Brush Dispersity. ACS Macro Lett. 2025;14(3):371–376. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5c00036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim K., Grummon B. C., Thrasher C. J., Macfarlane R. J.. Regio-Selective Mechanical Enhancement of Polymer-Grafted Nanoparticle Composites via Light-Mediated Crosslinking. Adv. Mater. 2025;37(10):2410493. doi: 10.1002/adma.202410493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maguire S. M., McClimon J. B., Zhang A. C., Keller A. W., Bilchak C. R., Ohno K., Carpick R. W., Composto R. J.. Nanoscale Structure–Property Relations in Self-Regulated Polymer-Grafted Nanoparticle Composite Structures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023;15(8):10974–10985. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c15786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heidari B., Zarshenas P., Sedghi R., Nabid M. R., Varma R. S.. Highly selective and sensitive recognition of multi-ions in aqueous solution based on polymer-grafted nanoparticle as visual colorimetric sensor. Sci. Rep. 2024;14(1):213. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50627-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin R., Luo L., Hu X., Murata H., Jeong J., Gao F., Qiu Z., Tang B. Z., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K.. Brush-modified fluorescent organic nanoparticles by ATRP with rigidity-regulated emission. Chem. Sci. 2025;16(23):10333–10339. doi: 10.1039/D5SC02349A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dienemann L. L., Yin R., Liu T., Stejer A., Kempkes V., Li S., Zenyuk I. V., Matyjaszewski K., Panzer M. J.. Hybrid Particle Brush Coatings with Tailored Design for Enhanced Dendrite Prevention and Cycle Life in Lithium Metal Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023;6(22):11602–11612. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.3c02051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tawade B. V., Singh M., Apata I. E., Veerasamy J., Pradhan N., Karim A., Douglas J. F., Raghavan D.. Polymer-Grafted Nanoparticles with Variable Grafting Densities for High Energy Density Polymeric Nanocomposite Dielectric Capacitors. JACS Au. 2023;3(5):1365–1375. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang Y.-L., Li C.-C., Chaganti S. V., Sharma S. U., Ho S.-L., Chen Y.-J., Chen P.-J., Lee J.-T.. Polymer Brush-Grafted Silicon Nanoparticles as a Binder-Free Anode for Enhanced Lithium-Ion Battery Performance. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2025;8(11):6976–6989. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.5c00071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li B., Gao H., Lu Z.-Y.. Janus polymer-grafted nanoparticles mimicking membrane repair proteins for the prevention of lipid membrane rupture. Nanoscale. 2023;15(22):9775–9782. doi: 10.1039/D3NR00395G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah I. U., Jadhav S. A., Belekar V. M., Patil P. S.. Smart polymer grafted silica based drug delivery systems. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2023;34(1):24–43. doi: 10.1002/pat.5890. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rudra S., Dhara M., Chakraborty M., Jana T.. Fluorinated Polymer Brush-Grafted Silica Nanoparticles: Robust and Durable Self-Cleaning Coating Materials. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023;5(9):7443–7457. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.3c01312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Olivier A., Meyer F., Raquez J.-M., Damman P., Dubois P.. Surface-initiated controlled polymerization as a convenient method for designing functional polymer brushes: From self-assembled monolayers to patterned surfaces. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012;37(1):157–181. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kango S., Kalia S., Celli A., Njuguna J., Habibi Y., Kumar R.. Surface modification of inorganic nanoparticles for development of organic–inorganic nanocompositesA review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013;38(8):1232–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Song Y., Ye G., Wu F., Wang Z., Liu S., Kopeć M., Wang Z., Chen J., Wang J., Matyjaszewski K.. Bioinspired Polydopamine (PDA) Chemistry Meets Ordered Mesoporous Carbons (OMCs): A Benign Surface Modification Strategy for Versatile Functionalization. Chem. Mater. 2016;28(14):5013–5021. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01729. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y., Xianyu Y., Jiang X.. Surface Modification of Gold Nanoparticles with Small Molecules for Biochemical Analysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017;50(2):310–319. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu N., Ji H., Yu P., Niu J., Farooq M. U., Akram M. W., Udego I. O., Li H., Niu X.. Surface Modification of Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2018;8(10):810. doi: 10.3390/nano8100810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ling W., Wang M., Xiong C., Xie D., Chen Q., Chu X., Qiu X., Li Y., Xiao X.. Synthesis, surface modification, and applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Mater. Res. 2019;34(11):1828–1844. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2019.129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mocny P., Klok H.-A.. Complex polymer topologies and polymernanoparticle hybrid films prepared via surface-initiated controlled radical polymerization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2020;100:101185. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pribyl, J. ; Benicewicz, B. C. . Surface and Particle Modification via RAFT Polymerization: An Update. In RAFT Polymerization; Wiley-VCH, 2021; pp 1017–1049. [Google Scholar]
- Hui C. M., Pietrasik J., Schmitt M., Mahoney C., Choi J., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K.. Surface-Initiated Polymerization as an Enabling Tool for Multifunctional (Nano-)Engineered Hybrid Materials. Chem. Mater. 2014;26(1):745–762. doi: 10.1021/cm4023634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Khabibullin, A. ; Mastan, E. ; Matyjaszewski, K. ; Zhu, S. . Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. In Controlled Radical Polymerization at and from Solid Surfaces; Vana, P. , Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2016; pp 29–76. [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Wang J., Cui F., Han Y., Yan J., Qin X., Zhang L., Matyjaszewski K.. Surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization for the preparation and applications of brush-modified inorganic nanoparticles. Adv. Nanocompos. 2024;1(1):318–343. doi: 10.1016/j.adna.2024.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Lo Bocchiaro A., Hu X., Pavon C., Pezzato C., Matyjaszewski K., Lorandi F., Benetti E. M.. Open-Air Growth of Polymer Brushes by Surface-Initiated PhotoATRP under Red-Light Irradiation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025;17(26):38773–38782. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c08584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhattacharya A., Misra B. N.. Grafting: a versatile means to modify polymers: Techniques, factors and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004;29(8):767–814. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Michalek L., Barner L., Barner-Kowollik C.. Polymer on Top: Current Limits and Future Perspectives of Quantitatively Evaluating Surface Grafting. Adv. Mater. 2018;30(21):1706321. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu H., Zhao Y., Tarnsangpradit J., Autore T., Jeong J., Matyjaszewski K., Bockstaller M. R.. Confinement-Driven Segregation Enables Glassy Polymer Hybrid Materials Featuring Disordered Hyperuniformity and Integrated Self-Healing. ACS Mater. Lett. 2025;7(8):2902–2909. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.5c00878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bombalski L., Dong H., Listak J., Matyjaszewsk K., Bockstaller M. R.. Null-Scattering Hybrid Particles Using Controlled Radical Polymerization. Adv. Mater. 2007;19(24):4486–4490. doi: 10.1002/adma.200700928. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Matyjaszewski K., Tsarevsky N. V.. Macromolecular Engineering by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136(18):6513–6533. doi: 10.1021/ja408069v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Yan J., Liu T., Wei Q., Li S., Olszewski M., Wu J., Sobieski J., Fantin M., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K.. Control of Dispersity and Grafting Density of Particle Brushes by Variation of ATRP Catalyst Concentration. ACS Macro Lett. 2019;8(7):859–864. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.9b00405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arraez F. J., Van Steenberge P. H. M., Sobieski J., Matyjaszewski K., D’hooge D. R.. Conformational Variations for Surface-Initiated Reversible Deactivation Radical Polymerization: From Flat to Curved Nanoparticle Surfaces. Macromolecules. 2021;54(18):8270–8288. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00855. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yin R., Chmielarz P., Zaborniak I., Zhao Y., Szczepaniak G., Wang Z., Liu T., Wang Y., Sun M., Wu H., Tarnsangpradit J., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K.. Miniemulsion SI-ATRP by Interfacial and Ion-Pair Catalysis for the Synthesis of Nanoparticle Brushes. Macromolecules. 2022;55(15):6332–6340. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c01114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Y., Wang Z., Yu C., Wu H., Olszewski M., Yin R., Zhai Y., Liu T., Coronado A., Matyjaszewski K., Bockstaller M. R.. Topologically Induced Heterogeneity in Gradient Copolymer Brush Particle Materials. Macromolecules. 2022;55(19):8846–8856. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c01131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Y., Wu H., Yin R., Yu C., Matyjaszewski K., Bockstaller M. R.. Copolymer Brush Particle Hybrid Materials with “Recall-and-Repair” Capability. Chem. Mater. 2023;35(17):6990–6997. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jakubowski W., Matyjaszewski K.. Activators Regenerated by Electron Transfer for Atom-Transfer Radical Polymerization of (Meth)acrylates and Related Block Copolymers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006;45(27):4482–4486. doi: 10.1002/anie.200600272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matyjaszewski K., Dong H., Jakubowski W., Pietrasik J., Kusumo A.. Grafting from Surfaces for “Everyone”: ARGET ATRP in the Presence of Air. Langmuir. 2007;23(8):4528–4531. doi: 10.1021/la063402e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song Y., Ye G., Lu Y., Chen J., Wang J., Matyjaszewski K.. Surface-Initiated ARGET ATRP of Poly(Glycidyl Methacrylate) from Carbon Nanotubes via Bioinspired Catechol Chemistry for Efficient Adsorption of Uranium Ions. ACS Macro Lett. 2016;5(3):382–386. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Fantin M., Sobieski J., Wang Z., Yan J., Lee J., Liu T., Li S., Olszewski M., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K.. Pushing the Limit: Synthesis of SiO2-g-PMMA/PS Particle Brushes via ATRP with Very Low Concentration of Functionalized SiO2–Br Nanoparticles. Macromolecules. 2019;52(22):8713–8723. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b01973. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lorandi F., Fantin M., Matyjaszewski K.. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization: A Mechanistic Perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(34):15413–15430. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c05364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitfield R., Parkatzidis K., Rolland M., Truong N. P., Anastasaki A.. Tuning Dispersity by Photoinduced Atom Transfer Radical Polymerisation: Monomodal Distributions with ppm Copper Concentration. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019;58(38):13323–13328. doi: 10.1002/anie.201906471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimizu T., Truong N. P., Whitfield R., Anastasaki A.. Tuning Ligand Concentration in Cu(0)-RDRP: A Simple Approach to Control Polymer Dispersity. ACS Polym. Au. 2021;1(3):187–195. doi: 10.1021/acspolymersau.1c00030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doncom K. E. B., Blackman L. D., Wright D. B., Gibson M. I., O’Reilly R. K.. Dispersity effects in polymer self-assemblies: a matter of hierarchical control. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46(14):4119–4134. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00818F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitfield R., Truong N. P., Messmer D., Parkatzidis K., Rolland M., Anastasaki A.. Tailoring polymer dispersity and shape of molecular weight distributions: methods and applications. Chem. Sci. 2019;10(38):8724–8734. doi: 10.1039/C9SC03546J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin R., Wang Z., Bockstaller M. R., Matyjaszewski K.. Tuning dispersity of linear polymers and polymeric brushes grown from nanoparticles by atom transfer radical polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2021;12(42):6071–6082. doi: 10.1039/D1PY01178B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lo Bocchiaro A., Pavón C., Lorandi F., Benetti E. M.. Discreteness and dispersity in the design of polymeric materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2025;167:101992. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2025.101992. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gentekos D. T., Sifri R. J., Fors B. P.. Controlling polymer properties through the shape of the molecular-weight distribution. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019;4(12):761–774. doi: 10.1038/s41578-019-0138-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





