Abstract
CRISPR-based diagnostic platforms have gained significant momentum in recent years, enabling highly sensitive and specific detection of pathogens and diseases. Due to their practical benefits, these platforms have become widely adopted in point-of-care (PoC) applications. CRISPR-on-chip technology integrates CRISPR-Cas platforms with diverse microfluidic systems, allowing scalability and portable, real-time, and precise biomolecule detection. This approach enhances diagnostic accuracy, reduces processing times, and minimizes the need for complex laboratory infrastructures, unlike in conventional diagnostics. Using CRISPR-Cas enzymes in microfluidic systems, CRISPR-on-chip platforms offer key advantages such as single-molecule sensitivity, multiplex detection, and applicability. However, integration with microfluidics for PoC applications is still poorly understood, despite CRISPR-Cas being widely used. This study reviews recent developments in CRISPR-on-chip-based diagnostics and highlights its potential applications in infectious diseases, biosensors, and personalized medicine. Furthermore, challenges and future perspectives in achieving an ideal diagnostic solution are discussed.
Keywords: CRISPR-based diagnostic, microfluidics, point-of-care (PoC), CRISPR-on-chip technology


1. Introduction
Conventional molecular diagnostic platforms, such as PCR, qPCR, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), face significant challenges in achieving consistent applicability, particularly in regions with limited healthcare infrastructure. − These challenges stem from their high costs, requirements for sophisticated equipment, and dependence on highly skilled personnel. In this context, clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) systems, which had initially been utilized for gene editing purposes, have become effective diagnostic tools owing to their high specificity, sensitivity, and seamless integration capability with diverse platforms. − The unique properties of Cas effectors make CRISPR-based platforms provide quick, affordable, and portable substitutes. ,,, Furthermore, obstacles, e.g., clinical validation, signal amplification needs, and limit of detection, continue to prevent widespread adoption. ,,,
Microfluidic systems have become a game-changer in diagnostics, allowing for highly sensitive, miniaturized, and high-throughput detection. , These systems are ideal for point-of-care (PoC) applications because they facilitate quick, automated, and cost-effective disease detection by combining numerous laboratory functions onto a single chip. ,− Technological developments in fabrication, employing materials like polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), glass, and other polymers, have produced adaptable microfluidic platforms that integrate multiple detection techniques, such as optical and electrochemical methods. , Advances in microfabrication and 3D bioprinting have enabled faster, more complex, and cost-effective chip designs. , By combining advanced fluid control mechanisms and nucleic acid extraction systems, developments in microfluidic technologies have produced fully automated molecular diagnostics. ,, Molecular diagnostic capabilities have been greatly enhanced by developments in the microfluidics area, especially in precision medicine and the detection of infectious diseases.
CRISPR-on-chip, the combination of CRISPR-Cas systems and microfluidic technology, is a major advancement in diagnostics. ,, CRISPR-on-chip allows for ultrasensitive, real-time, and portable diagnostic solutions by fusing the automation, miniaturization, and quick processing capabilities of microfluidic platforms with the programmability and high specificity of CRISPR-based detection. ,, With single-molecule sensitivity, these systems have shown great promise in identifying genetic mutations, infectious diseases, and cancer biomarkers. , Combining microfluidic channels, stimulation elements, embedded biosensors, and finely tunable microenvironments can be developed. , Using modern bioprinting techniques vascularized and viable tissue models with functional maturity can now be fabricated. These models can be patient-derived, leading to higher personalization and precision. With the use of microfluidics in patient-derived on-chip models, individualized drug screening and disease modeling can be achieved. CRISPR-integration can further expand the capabilities of such platforms, paving the way for precision diagnostics and personalized testing on standardized miniaturized models.
CRISPR-based diagnostics are now even more accessible and effective in accordance with developments in microfluidic architectures, such as polymer-based, centrifugal, paper-based, and digital microfluidics. ,,− The seamless integration of Deep Learning (DL), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Internet of Things (IoT) will enhance PoC usability, automate result interpretation, and optimize data analysis. − This review explores the integration of CRISPR-Cas platforms with microfluidic chip systems, collectively referred to as CRISPR-on-Chip, and highlights recent breakthroughs and emerging applications that demonstrate their transformative potential in molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine.
2. CRISPR-Cas System: Evolution, Mechanism, and Diagnostic Potential
The CRISPR/Cas system is essentially defined as an immune system mechanism improved by prokaryotic organisms throughout evolution against bacteriophage infections. , The engineered CRISPR/Cas system provides accurate detection via specific activation of Cas proteins led by the gRNA that is uniquely designed to target foreign genetic material. , These modified CRISPR/Cas systems have extensive applications in fields such as gene therapy in medicine, cancer, drug development, tissue engineering, and industrial/agricultural biotechnology. , CRISPR-Cas platforms have recently evolved into a powerful diagnostic tool, leading to promising innovative applications.
CRISPR sequences were first discovered by Ishino et al. in the Escherichia coli genome. Five unusual repetitive sequences were identified while sequencing of the iap gene, which is responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion. The biological function of these repetitive sequences in the genome remained unclear and was classified as “cryptic sequences” for years. Research conducted by Dr. Mojica and colleagues in the 1990s began to shed light on the mystery surrounding CRISPR sequences. , Similar repetitive sequences were found in the archaeal species Haloferax mediterranei. , In 1996, these sequences were also identified in cyanobacteria and were termed long tandemly repeated repetitive (LTRR) sequences. Three independent research groups revealed in the early 2000s that CRISPR sequences contain foreign genomic sequences originating from bacteriophages and plasmids. This breakthrough advanced the idea that CRISPR is a unique part of the prokaryotic adaptive immunological system. ,, In these findings, it has been stated that target genetic material is cleaved through Cas proteins’ activity based on immunological memory, and the mechanism has particularly evolved against bacteriophage infection. , In 2012, Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer A. Doudna introduced CRISPR-Cas9 as a genome-editing tool. Their research demonstrated that the Cas9 endonuclease could perform precise DNA cutting under the guidance of a programmed single-guide RNA (sgRNA). , Due to its revolutionary impact on genetic engineering, this discovery was awarded the 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
CRISPR-Cas can be classified under two main divisions (classes I and II) and various subtypes (Type I, III, IV/Type II, V, VI). , CRISPR sequences are present in approximately 40 and 90% of bacterial and archaeal genomes, respectively, and definitive evidence for their presence in eukaryotic organisms has not yet been obtained. Ninety percent of CRISPR-Cas systems are class I systems, which are made up of several protein domains with distinct roles. Class II systems, on the other hand, are considerably less prevalent in nature and function with a single protein subunit. Generally, CRISPR systems used in diagnostics are divided into five main categories: Cas9, Cas12, Cas13, Cas14, and Cas10. In gene editing and therapeutic studies where high sensitivity and sequence compatibility are strictly considered, the Cas9 enzyme (Tip II) shows specific cleavage activity against target DNA. , The Cas10 system recognizes RNA targets and initiates the cleavage activity after precise pairing; this system belongs to type III and has been effective in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Particularly, Cas12 (Tip V) and Cas13 (Tip VI) systems have been widely used in diagnostic platforms. , Cas12 and Cas13 systems exhibit collateral cleavage activity upon target recognition, with Cas12 targeting double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and triggering nonspecific single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) cleavage. In contrast, Cas13 targets ssRNA and induces collateral ssRNA cleavage. In CRISPR-based diagnostic platforms, Cas12 exhibits trans-DNase activity depending on the recognition of the DNA target, while Cas13 exhibits trans-RNase activity following the recognition of RNA targets. Unlike the traditional approach, recent studies have revealed that Cas12 and Cas13 enzymes might display different recognition and cleavage activities. It has been reported that Cas12a can, under certain conditions, recognize not only DNA but also RNA targets under certain conditions and exhibit trans-RNase activity in this process. In addition, Cas13a, known as an RNA-specific nuclease, has been suggested to recognize DNA targets and exhibit trans-cleavage activity with high specificity. These findings may expand the versatility and application potential of CRISPR-Cas enzymes in diagnostics, contributing to developing sensitive, specific, more flexible and robust platforms for detecting both DNA and RNA-based pathogens.
Despite its broad range of potential applications, CRISPR/Cas systems currently have some limitations. Off-target editing has remained one of the primary concerns regarding Cas protein activity. While several methods have decreased off-target activity and optimization studies have shown great potential, a consensus method has not been reached yet. While CRISPR-based diagnostics have demonstrated high specificity and target recognition, achieving reliable and robust single-base specificity has remained challenging. Sample preparation and extraction steps have introduced the risk of contamination, leading researchers to explore CRISPR-integrated nucleic acid amplification methods and single-pot assay formats. ,, Quantification has remained limited with a majority of CRISPR assays producing qualitative or semiquantitative outputs. Multiplexed assays have been developed, however, throughput trade-offs have limited scaling. Some panels and more complex designs have had to compromise on sensitivity/specificity or required cold chains, limiting use in resource-limited settings.
While limitations have not been completely addressed, significant progress has been achieved, allowing the field of CRISPR-based diagnostics to gain widespread attention. In CRISPR-Cas-based detection mechanisms, signal amplification and detection steps are carried out using various techniques after nonspecific cutting activity dependent on the target sequence (Figure ). In this context, fluorescence-based reporting systems, lateral flow assays, and electrochemical sensors are widely used in CRISPR-based diagnostic platforms. In particular, electrochemical detection strategies offer significant advantages in real-time, automatic, and quantitative diagnostic processes by showing high compatibility with microfluidic-based systems, and digital diagnostic platforms. In addition, using reporter molecules with different properties increases the sensitivity of the relevant detection methods. It facilitates the integration of platforms into PoC applications. The use of colorimetric assays, biotin-based labeling systems, turbidity-based detection, gold nanoparticle-based sensors, and polyelectrolytes play a critical role in increasing the specificity and sensitivity of CRISPR-based diagnostic systems. The new-generation CRISPR-on-Chip technology offers low-cost, high-sensitivity, and specific diagnostic capabilities while also enabling field applications thanks to its minimal laboratory equipment requirements. Additionally, the integration of CRISPR-on-Chip systems with AI-supported analyses, wearable biosensors, and mobile phone-based detection systems has become one of the main reasons for the increasing interest in this technology in the field of diagnostics in recent years. ,
1.
CRISPR-on-Chip technologies are illustrated with various schematics. CRISPR detection technology can be amplification-free or combined with a preamplification step. Nucleic acid amplification techniques such as NASBA, RCA, RAA, LAMP, and RPA are used for preamplification. Cas9, Cas12, and Cas13 are the most used enzymes in diagnostic systems. While Cas9 has a specific target cleavage effect, Cas12 and Cas13 have a nontarget cleavage effect. Cas9, Cas12, and Cas13 cleave dsDNA, ssDNA, and ssRNA, respectively. The endonuclease activities of Cas enzymes allow the use of reporters. These reporters serve for fluorescence detection, colorimetric detection (lateral flow strip/paper-based), and electrochemical detection. CRISPR technology can be combined with a wide variety of microfluidic systems. The most combined microfluidic systems include polymer-based, paper-based, droplet-based, digital, and centrifugal types. With support for smartphones, ML, and AI, it enables high-accuracy results collection and data comparison.
3. CRISPR-Cas-Based Diagnostic Modalities
3.1. Nucleic Acid–Based Platforms
Nucleic acid–based diagnostic methods can be examined in two categories: preamplification-based and amplification-free systems. Thanks to highly efficient amplification tests, optimum sensitivity is observed especially in the diagnosis of acute and chronic diseases caused by infectious diseases. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), recognized as the gold standard among amplification tests, offers significant advantages, including high sensitivity and specificity. However, it also presents notable drawbacks, such as the requirement for sophisticated equipment, trained personnel, and high operational costs. , In addition to PCR, some isothermal nucleic acid amplification tests have also been developed and applied in various CRISPR-Cas based diagnostic platforms. In another field, in the platforms that do not include upstream amplification, samples with high analyte concentrations can be used for targets such as microbial genome, human genomic DNA, human mRNA, and miRNA, and the detection limit is usually observed at the picomolar level.
In the field of point-of-care diagnosis, the goal is to create user-friendly, fast, and advanced equipment-free platforms. , Considering these criteria, the development and improvement of platforms that do not require preamplification are important for the field of diagnosis. However, more research is needed to increase the sensitivity of preamplification-free CRISPR-Cas-based diagnostic platforms so that they can be used as a reliable method for clinical needs. To overcome these limitations, various approaches such as multiple crRNA-based determination, signal cascade amplification, and the use of digital technologies have been investigated.
3.1.1. Amplification-Based Platforms
Two-step CRISPR-Cas-based diagnostic systems rely on the principle that the target nucleic acid is first amplified using a PCR or an isothermal amplification method, and then a specific readout is obtained through CRISPR-Cas activity in another environment. ,, In these methods, isothermal techniques such as recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) are used to obtain high amounts of target nucleic acid in a short time. , For example, the allele-specific sensing ability of Cas13a has been combined with RPA to detect pathogens at attomolar levels. While these two-step platforms offer high sensitivity and specificity, they may also have disadvantages such as processing time and risk of contamination. , Pardee et al. developed a platform (NASBACC) that combines NASBA isothermal amplification and CRISPR-Cas9-based toehold switch reactions for the detection of Zika virus. This paper-based, low-cost, and portable platform provided specific detection of Zika virus strains with fM-level sensitivity and became one of the leading studies of the period in the field of CRISPR-Diagnostics (CRISPR-Dx).
In CRISPR-Cas-based diagnostic platforms, amplification of the target nucleic acid is of critical importance for situations requiring ultrasensitivity. In addition to the two-stage detection involving CRISPR-Cas activity after preamplification, “one-pot” platforms that combine both processes in a single stage have also been developed. In the face of possible contamination risks that may negatively affect the performance of the system in two-stage processes, one-pot systems have recently gained attention especially in the field of PoC diagnostics. In a study conducted by Zhou et al., the CRISPR-one (CRISPR-mediated testing in one tube, one pot) platform, dependent on CRISPR-AapCas12b activity, was developed based on multiple cross-displacement amplification of the DNA segment encoding the community-acquired respiratory distress syndrome toxin of M. pneumoniae. This platform, which shows significant sensitivity compared to its microfluidic chip and real-time PCR counterparts and operates in a single reaction environment, has been described as promising in clinical studies due to the specificity, convenience, and speed it provides.
3.1.2. Amplification-Free Platforms
Currently, molecular diagnostic technologies have advanced markedly in specificity and sensitivity, with novel CRISPR-based platforms providing innovative solutions in this domain. Detection of biomarkers at low concentrations has become possible, especially thanks to selective targeting of nucleic acids and signal generation techniques. DASH (Depletion of Abundant Sequences by Hybridization) targets unwanted nucleic acid sequences at high concentrations via Cas9, providing sensitive detection of target sequences at trace amounts, especially in metagenomic pathogen analyses. Rather than being a diagnostic platform, this system is optimized to increase detection sensitivity in existing platforms (e.g., NGS applications) and in areas such as cancer detection (cancer profiling). The acCRISPR-PTS-SERS platform is an innovative method for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma biomarkers. It combines surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) with CRISPR-Cas technologies on pregnancy test strips, marking a significant advancement in biomarker detection. In this system, CRISPR-Cas technology was used for signal amplification, overcoming the low sensitivity and limitations in quantitative analysis. In addition, the use of gold nanoparticle-based core–shell structured Raman nanoprobes increased the detection sensitivity to the femtomolar level, allowing ultralow detection limits to be achieved. The method offers high specificity, accuracy, and stability in serum samples and is considered a prospective strategy for automated and quantitative analysis by integrating with microfluidic chips and smartphone technology. DC-ECL-CRISPR emerged as a sensitive RNA detection method that does not require RNA amplification. This method is capable of detecting E. coli RNA with high specificity. The platform provides two-step signal amplification using Ru(II)-PLL complex and CRISPR/Cas13a. In particular, the integration of dry reagents into the lateral flow chip eliminated additional processing steps and reduced the total detection time to 20 min. The effective implementation of this approach in clinical samples and its versatility for biomarker and heavy metal studies suggest substantial potential for incorporation into extensive diagnostic platforms.
3.2. Non-Nucleic Acid–Based Platforms
CRISPR-based diagnostic methods can also be used to detect non-nucleic acid biomarkers such as small organic molecules, proteins, and metal ions. In these applications, CRISPR acts as a signal enhancer or reporting tool, while detection of the target molecule is achieved through conformational changes in proteins or aptamers. In addition, new approaches such as allosteric transcription factors (aTFs) and CRISPR-responsive hydrogels offer great potential in PoC diagnostic systems, while the specificity and applicability of these platforms have increased with the use of functional DNA (fDNA). The CRISPR-based Ultrasensitive Immunoassay (CRUISE) technology, recently developed, integrates CRISPR-Cas12a enzymatic activity with conventional immunoassay techniques, facilitating the highly sensitive identification of non-nucleic acid targets. CRUISE optimizes the target recognition process by using antibodies conjugated with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) instead of aptamers or allosteric transcription factors (aTFs) and increases signal amplification by binding more than one ssDNA per antibody. This platform, which shows 1000 times higher sensitivity compared to traditional ELISA tests, has brought an innovative approach integrated with traditional immunoassay methods.
4. CRISPR-Cas and Microfluidics: Next-Generation Diagnostic Platforms
4.1. Sample Preparation Strategies and Their Integration into Microfluidic Systems
For CRISPR-based diagnostics to be effectively utilized in PoC settings, it is critical to underline the upstream processing steps. These include sample preparation, nucleic acid extraction, amplification, transduction, target recognition, and detection. All processing steps significantly impact the overall sensitivity, specificity, and usability of diagnostic systems in resource-limited environments. Microfluidic systems have constraints in portability owing to their reliance on external instruments such as pumps and power supplies. Instead, these devices can be substituted with integrated, smaller components, increasing their scalability and reliability in point-of-care settings. From this point of view, sample preparation, purification, and concentration of target analytes are essential requirements for developing CRISPR-based microfluidic systems suitable for field use. Pretreatment of clinical samples can be done with more straightforward methods, such as filtration that does not require centrifugation on microfluidic platforms, and cell disruption can be integrated with thermal, chemical, enzymatic, mechanical, or electrical methods. Nucleic acid extraction can be performed by liquid–solid, solid–solid, and magnetic bead extraction methods. In addition, the isotachophoresis method, which is compatible with amplification methods and CRISPR-Cas reaction and can be integrated into microfluidic systems, has recently attracted attention.
4.2. Microfluidic CRISPR-Dx Platforms
Diagnostic capabilities and practical usability of CRISPR-Cas systems can be improved substantially by leveraging micro- and potentially nanotechnologies. Microfluidics can help streamline automation, improve sensitivity, and enable multiplexing. Successful CRISPR PoC devices couple sample-to-answer workflows within closed microfluidics systems to minimize contamination and user dependency. Steps such as on-chip extraction or amplification directly from clinical samples can be integrated depending on platform goals. Then, a detection modality is selected. Electrochemical and optical/fluorescent detection systems are widely adopted. The detection modality can enable amplification-free diagnostics, quantification, and multianalyte assays. Performance optimization can be achieved using a wide range of strategies including gRNA design optimization, chip-surface chemistry modification, or reaction environment (i.e.) alteration. Final steps for clinical and PoC translation include multiplexing, balancing sensitivity, cost, and robustness, data integration, or adopting user-friendly elements.
4.2.1. Polymer-Based CRISPR-Microfluidic Chips
Polymer-based microfluidic systems offer innovative diagnostic platforms for the rapid and sensitive detection of nucleic acids when integrated with CRISPR systems. Polymers such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) are frequently preferred in the development of such integrated systems due to their low-cost production, optical transparency, and biocompatibility. , Other materials can be thermoplastics (e.g., polystyrene, polycarbonate, and cyclic olefin copolymer), glass, and silicon. Techniques such as hot embossing, laser cutting, and 3D printing are frequently employed in the production of these devices. ,
Ren et al. developed a one-pot PDMS/Glass chip platform based on portable RPA preamplification and CRISPR-Cas12a trans-cleavage activity that can directly detect nucleic acids of intestinal pathogens (Figure a). The essential features of the platform are its ability to detect multiple samplesE. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureuson a single chip, its high programmability, and its usability for the detection of other targets by changing the crRNA and RPA primers. A PDMS chip system for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 with CRISPR/Cas13a was able to diagnose with a sensitivity of 100 copies/μL in just 30 min using mobile phone microscopy The IMPACT (Integrated Micropillar Polydimethylsiloxane Accurate CRISPR Detection) system offers Cas12a-mediated viral DNA detection on a PDMS-based microfluidic system. Chip surfaces designed with a micropillar structure are coated with streptavidin to immobilize ssDNA probes. Fluorescent signals are generated in the presence of target DNA due to the collateral cleavage activity of Cas12a. This design enables highly sensitive detection in the 0.1–1 nM range. The CASCADE system was able to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA without CRISPR/Cas12a-based amplification on a PMMA-based microfluidic chip. Gas bubbles generated by catalase-bound ssDNA probes are read with a mobile phone camera, providing a highly sensitive (∼50 copies/μL) and portable diagnostic platform.
2.
(a) The integration of a polymer-based one-pot chip for the RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a reaction is schematized. The RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a one-pot reaction principle and the on-chip reaction results on a microarray fluorescence scanner are demonstrated. Adapted with permission from ref . Copyright 2024 Elsevier Inc. (b) The operating principle of a paper-based microfluidic biosensor that detects Pb(II) using a CRISPR-Cas12a-enabled, smartphone-based device is illustrated. The presence of Pb(II) inhibits Cas12a activation via G-quadruplex structures, preventing the dispersion of gold nanoparticles. The dispersed nanoparticles are captured by DNA nanoflowers in the detection region, resulting in a color change. Adapted with permission from ref . Copyright 2022 Elsevier Inc. (c) RAA and CRISPR-Cas12a reactions are integrated and automatically carried out on a PMMA-based disc-shaped centrifuge microfluidic (lab-on-a-disc) system. Adapted with permission from ref . Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (d) The structure of the lab-on-a-disc and the resulting fluorescent signal are detected by readout in approximately 1.5 h. Adapted with permission from ref . Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (e) The operating principle of Cas13a-based RNA detection on the droplet microfluidic platform is presented. By isolating target RNA molecules in each droplet, the RNA-triggered catalytic activity of the Cas13a enzyme is enhanced, enabling specific and amplification-free RNA detection. Adapted with permission from ref . Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society. (f) Digital RNA quantification is achieved at the single-molecule level by measuring signal intensity within the droplets using fluorescence microscopy on the droplet microfluidic chip. Adapted with permission from ref . Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
4.2.2. Paper-Based CRISPR-Microfluidic Chips
Low-cost and manufacturable microfluidic platforms have garnered significant interest in recent years thanks to their ease of fabrication and environmental compatibility. In particular, paper-based microfluidic devices are easy to fabricate by arranging hydrophobic and hydrophilic areas to regulate fluid flow, and they can be safely disposed.
Xu et al. introduced a portable paper-based biosensor for the detection of miRNA-141 based on CRISPR-Cas12a-Glucose oxidase (GOD) cleavage and peroxidase (POD)-like catalytic activity of AuPtPd@GOD nanozyme imprinted on graphdiyne oxide (GDY). In this study, ultrasensitive and real-time analysis at the aM level was carried out by colorimetric and electrochemical dual-detection methods. The sensor tested in human serum samples transmitted to a smartphone via Bluetooth; color change due to oxidation of the TMB indicator by AuPtPd@GDY was assessed by camera and application on the smartphone. This innovative platform introduces a promising approach for PoC tumor biomarker detection. In a study, it was designed by a paper-based microbiosensor chip where the CRISPR-CAS12a technique is applied and PB(II) ions were made in place, low-cost and rapid detection (Figure b). The sensor produces visual signal based on color change by suppressing CAS12a activation through Pb(II)-induced G-quadruplex structure. Quantitative analysis can be done with the smartphone application. The method is compliant with high specificity, determination, and field applications.
PLACID (Paper-based LAMP-CRISPR Integrated Diagnostics) platform is a low-cost, biocompatible, portable, and sensitive molecular diagnostic tool that integrates LAMP and CRISPR-Cas12a on a paper-based chip. Sample processing, heating, and fluorescence-based detection are performed on a single chip under the monitoring of Arduino UNO R3 microcontroller. PLACID provides optimum detection through colorimetric/luminance analysis supported by a Bluetooth-connected smartphone application. It offers significant potential for field applications with its stability for up to 8 weeks at room temperature.
4.2.3. Digital CRISPR-Microfluidic Chips
Lab-on-a-Chip (LoC) technologies can be precisely and flexibly manipulated using digital microfluidics, which allows for the controlled manipulation of discrete droplets, usually in the nanoliter to microliter range. Digital CRISPR-based microfluidic systems provide highly sensitive and quantitative detection by dividing diagnostic reagents into multiple microreactors (droplets or microchambers). These systems are typically constructed with droplet microfluidics or microchamber arrays and can optimize local environments, enhancing CRISPR enzyme activity. Digital microfluidics has the major benefit of not requiring traditional external instruments, like pumps and valves, which are typically necessary for continuous-flow microfluidic systems. These CRISPR-integrated platforms use fewer reagents than traditional methods, are amenable to automation, and offer single-molecule analysis (Figure e,f).
Tian et al. used a droplet-based CRISPR platform to detect 16S rRNA, microRNA, and SARS-CoV-2 at the single-molecule level. Systems such as RADICA and deCOViD have eliminated the need for a PCR thermocycler, enabling detection through isothermal amplification. However, deCOViD can cause overamplification of targets at low temperatures. , To address this issue, Ding et al. used a warm-start CRISPR method developed by MC-DRP that combines DAMP/RT-DAMP and Cas12a to detect 5 copies/μL of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 90 min.
An RPA-CRISPR-based digital microfluidic platform was designed for Helicobacter pylori virulence genotyping and detection by Liu et al. The platform is capable of multitarget analysis by simultaneously detecting cagA, vacA, and ureB genes. This digital CRISPR-based integrated chip system offers rapid and highly sensitive diagnosis by reducing the reaction time to 30 min. However, chip-based nucleic acid extraction’s lower efficiency than traditional methods has been stated as an important limitation of the system. For multipathogen detection, the CARMEN v.1 system was able to simultaneously detect 169 viruses using color coding and droplet matching (Figure ). In this study, an mChip architecture designed to scale the droplet-based workflow was also introduced, increasing the number of microwells to approximately 4500 and thereby substantially enhancing the overall testing capacity of the system (Figure a–g). However, the system’s specialized hardware requirements and 8–10 h workflow are limiting factors. These limitations arise due to the droplet generation process, the color-coding process, and the need for specialized imaging setups. Therefore, the developed mCARMEN platform can detect 21 viruses and distinguish SARS-CoV-2 variants with nearly 100% accuracy. The IFC-based approach eliminates the need for droplet handling in the mCARMEN platform, accelerating the workflow by enabling the automatic on-chip mixing of samples and detection reactions within 96 × 96 or 192 × 24 microfluidic cartridge formats (Figure h). Finally, Multiplexed Intermixed CRISPR Droplets (MIC-Drop) technology has demonstrated the feasibility of using digital microfluidics for in vivo CRISPR screening. The integration of 3D printing technology makes these systems more portable and sensitive. ,
3.
The CARMEN-multidroplet detection system is illustrated. Adapted from ref under CCBY 4.0 license. Copyright 2020 Springer Nature. (a) Need for multiplex detection of circulating pathogens in human and animal populations. (b) The principle of CARMEN-Cas13 is schematized. (c) Droplet fluorescence readout results for Zika virus detection. (d) Stages of the multidroplet microfluidic system; preparation of samples, creation of pool droplet emulsions, loading into the microfluidic system, and droplet flow progression are presented.
4.
Overview of the mChip architecture (a–g) (adapted from ref under CCBY 4.0 license. Copyright 2020 Springer Nature.) and the IFC-based mCARMEN workflow (h) (adapted from ref under CCBY 4.0 license. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature). (a) Comparison of standard CARMEN v1. chip and the expanded mChip layout. (b) CAD drawings of the acrylic molds used to fabricate the high-density microwell array. (c) Photograph of the fabricated mChip showing the enlarged microwell region. (d) Modular loading system used to position the mChip during the filling process. (e) Introduction of the droplet pool onto the chip surface for microwell loading. (f) Workflow steps illustrating droplet settlement into microwells and sealing of the mChip. (g) Final configuration of the sealed mChip prepared for low-magnification fluorescence imaging. (h) Schematic representation comparing the mChip-based CARMEN v1 configuration with the IFC-enabled mCARMEN workflow, in which 96 × 96 or 192 × 24 microfluidic cartridges autonomously mix samples and detection reactions, eliminating droplet handling and accelerating the overall process.
4.2.4. Centrifugal-Based CRISPR-Microfluidic Chips
Centrifugal microfluidics precisely controls fluid circulation inside microscale structures by using simple rotational forces. It is considered one of the most suitable platforms for rapid diagnostic systems, particularly PoC, due to its automation and integration.
Peng et al. developed a centrifugal microfluidic array called Cas12-MRVDB (Multiple Respiratory Virus Detection Biosensor) based on isothermal RPA followed by CRISPR-Cas12a fluorescent detection. This chip was designed to simultaneously detect 14 viral RNAs, including MERS, SARS, and some clinical variants of SARS-CoV-2. This platform, which can operate at a relatively low temperature (39 °C), provided high specificity while maintaining detection accuracy and sensitivity comparable to fluorescent PCR methods and achieved this in a very short time of 30 min. However, the failure to detect some SARS-CoV-2 mutant Omicron strains and the relative difficulties in stable storage conditions of RPA-CRISPR reaction reagents have raised some questions about the sensitivity of the platform. Chen et al.’s CASMEAN system integrates RAA and CRISPR-Cas12a-based nucleic acid detection with a PMMA-based centrifugal microfluidic disk (Figure c,d). Within the disk, amplification and CRISPR reactions occur automatically in separate compartments. The Cas12a enzyme’s ability to cleave target DNA is utilized in a controlled manner to produce a specific fluorescent signal. As a result, the entire process can be completed in approximately 1.5 h, delivering outcomes with high sensitivity and specificity.
The Automatic Microfluidic Diagnostic (AMIC) platform developed by Xiang et al. is a one-pot RAA-CRISPR/Cas13a-based system that utilizes a high-throughput fluorescent detection method. This system integrated the Chelex-100 chelating resin-based nucleic acid extraction method, which is comparable to the magnetic bead-based extraction method, into the microfluidic chip, reducing manual sample manipulation errors and shortening the total detection time to 40 min. However, the problems, such as neglecting sample enrichment and separation processes and the difficulty of detecting low-concentration bacteria, suggested that the system needs further optimization.
Li et al. established the Lab-in-a-Magnetofluidic Tube (LIAMT) platform, which provides a portable, fully integrated molecular diagnostic system for nucleic acid–based viral diagnosis. The system combines viral digestion, nucleic acid extraction, isothermal amplification, and CRISPR detection processes using magnetofluidic micro/nano magnetic beads in a single microcentrifuge tube. With a sensitivity of 73.4 and 63.9 copies/mL, respectively, LIAMT was able to identify HIV and SARS-CoV-2. However, two of the platform’s shortcomings are the 1 h detection time and the need for precise sample preparation. By adding fully automated magnetofluidics and reagent lyophilization systems, the platform could become more portable and support its widespread use in resource-constrained areas.
4.2.5. AI- and Deep-Learning Integrated CRISPR-Microfluidic Platforms
DL- and AL-based analysis performed via fluorescence detection and visual outputs visible to the naked eye (readout) on CRISPR/Cas12 and CRISPR/Cas13 platforms offer innovative solutions for diagnostics. In this way, sensitive and reliable results can be obtained in quantitative analyses. A CRISPR/Cas12a-based microwell array PDMS chip has been developed to detect Cryptococcus fungi with DL algorithms (Figure f–h). This chip, which was designed as a portable and integrated smartphone diagnostic platform, has shown ultrasensitivity at the 0.5 pM level.
5.
(a) Structure of the palm-sized device integrating thermal, optical, and smartphone modules. (b) RT-RPA-CRISPR assay on a digital chip. (c) Partitioned reactions on a digital chip running within a smartphone-integrated portable device. (d, e) Deep-learning-assisted fluorescence image analysis for accurate quantification of positive wells. (a–e) Adapted with permission from ref . Copyright 2023 medrXiv. (f) DEMA platform: architecture of the microwell array biological chip for rapid and sensitive detection of Cryptococcus subgroups via the CRISPR–Cas12a system. (g) Simplified schematic depiction of the testing steps performed on the chip. (h) Automatic recognition of well images and precise Cryptococcus enumeration using DL-assisted analysis. (f–h) Adapted from ref under Creative Commons CCBY license. Copyright 2024 John Wiley and Sons.
A smartphone-compatible platform that integrates CRISPR-based diagnostic systems with digital microfluidic technology is one of the first systems reported for the rapid and quantitative detection of HIV RNA and offers a significant advance in local clinical applications (Figure a–e). This system, which performs advanced sample analysis with an improved DL algorithm based on YOLOv5, needs further optimization due to factors such as high cost and limited suitability for PoC applications. Zhang et al. constructed an innovative microfluidic platform called mutaSCAN by combining RT-LAMP and CRISPR-Cas12a with DL technology. This platform, which eliminates nucleic acid extraction, offers rapid, sensitive, and automated analysis while providing scalability and AL-supported real-time imaging. On the other hand, one of the critical shortcomings of the system that limits its use in PoC diagnostics is its dependence on some basic laboratory equipment.
4.2.6. Other CRISPR-Microfluidic Chip-Based Platforms
CRISPR-on-Chip platforms have evolved beyond traditional genetic diagnostics, enabling the detection of a broad range of targets, such as protein biomarkers, telomerase activity, and oncogenes. Various biosensing strategies and amplification techniques have been employed, and these systems are promising for future biomedical applications.
Hu et al. exhibited a carbon nanotube-based field-effect transistor (CNT-FET) PoC testing platform, integrated with the CRISPR/Cas12a system. This platform enables ultrasensitive, specific, and real-time detection of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) protein. The platform cannot detect multiple biomarkers contained in whole blood samples, which is considered one of the platform’s main negative aspects. Also, the authors have concluded that further advancements in integrating microfluidics with the CNT-FET platform will be the upcoming goal. In this way, rapid isolation, enrichment, release, and simultaneous detection of different biomarkers associated with myocardial damage will be achieved.
The CRISPR-Cas12a-based microfluidic platform reported by Jiang et al. was designed to detect telomerase activity at the single-cell level. The platform provides sensitive detection by signal amplification via UiO-66 nanoparticles, a metal–organic framework (MOF) carrying DNA strands that trigger CRISPR/Cas12a activation. However, complex sample preparation and difficulties encountered in cell isolation can be considered major shortcomings.
Beyond pathogen diagnosis, CRISPR-on-Chip-based platforms offer significant potential in advanced biomedical applications, integrating with microfluidic chip technologies for genetic mutation detection. Many researchers in precision medicine (oncology) and cancer profiling have studied and evaluated this potential. A sensitive test was developed with a single crRNA using enzymatic recombinase amplification (ERA) combined with a modified CRISPR/Cas12a system that exhibits high mismatch tolerance for the detection of indel sites in cancer patients. This platform targets a large number of indel sites in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and minimal residual disease (MRD), at the same time, the potential for further integration with microfluidic chip systems is highlighted in the study.
A novel chip based on surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)-activated silver nanorod (AgNRs) combines catalytic hairpin assembly (CHA) and CRISPR-Cas13a activity, enabling the sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. This system, operating as a one-pot reaction, integrates the strong signal amplification effect of CHA with the high specificity of CRISPR-Cas13a, achieving exceptional sensitivity that is 500 times more sensitive than traditional CRISPR/Cas13a-based methods alone and 15,000 times more sensitive than immunoassays such as ELISA. In another study, the CRISPR/Cas12a system was integrated with SERS to detect viral DNA (HPV-16, HPV-18, HBV) without requiring amplification. A SERS-activated nanoarray composed of gold nanoparticles and graphene oxide achieved attomolar sensitivity. This platform offers a new avenue for highly sensitive, rapid, and amplification-free diagnosis.
The key characteristics of these CRISPR-on-chip systems, showcasing their diverse formats and target analytes have been summarized (Table ).
1. Overview of CRISPR-on-Chip Diagnostic Platforms.
| platform | CRISPR-Cas system | chip type | target | pathogen | signal output | amplification | sensitivity (LOD) | advantages and disadvantages | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| one-pot chip for gut pathogen detection | CRISPR-Cas12a | polymer-based | DNA | E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus | fluorescent | RPA | >0.43 cfu/mL | simultaneous detection, good programmability | |
| smartphone-mediated self-powered biosensor | CRISPR-Cas12a | paper-based | miRNA-141 | electrochemical and Colorimetric | free | 3.1 aM (electrochemical) and 15 aM (colorimetric) | |||
| PLACID | CRISPR-Cas12a | paper-based | DNA/RNA | SARS-CoV-2 and E. coli | fluorescent | LAMP/RT-LAMP | 50 copies/μL | smartphone app-mediated readout analysis | |
| automated digital microfluidics system | CRISPR-Cas12a | digital microfluidics | DNA | H. pylorii | fluorescent | RPA | 10 copies/rxn | automation, high specifity and sensitiveness, multiple sample processing | |
| mutaSCAN | CRISPR-Cas12a | digital microfluidics/DL | RNA | SARS-CoV-2 and variants | fluorescent | RT-LAMP | 250 copies/mL | increased throughput, extraction-free, inadequate for PoC | |
| Cas12a-MRVDB | CRISPR-Cas12a | centrifugal microfluidics | RNA | 14 viruses (SARS-CoV-2 variants, SARS, MERS, and others) | fluorescent | RT-RPA | 1 copy/μL | high multiplexing, ultrasensitivity, unfavorable reagent stability | |
| harmonized AMIC | CRISPR-Cas13a | centrifugal microfluidics | RNA | 12 respiratory bacteria | fluorescent | RAA | 10 CFU/mL | all-in-one approach | |
| LIAMT | CRISPR-Cas12c | centrifugal microfluidics | RNA | SARS-CoV-2 and HIV | fluorescent | RT-RPA | 73.4 and 63.9 copies/μL | sample-to-result approach, simple, portable | |
| DEMA | CRISPR-Cas12a | microwell array chip | DNA | Cryptococcus | fluorescent | free | 0.5 pM | high performance, deep-learning based analysis | |
| smartphone-enabled digital CRISPR device | CRISPR-Cas12a | RNA | HIV | fluorescent | RT-RPA | 75 copies | smartphone-enabled deep-learning-based image analysis, extremely high cost | ||
| plug-and-play CNT-FET biosensor | CRISPR-Cas12a | cardiac troponin I (cTnI) | fluorescent | free | 0.33 fg/mL | unable to detect multiple protein targets, promising for microfluidics field | |||
| MOF–DNA biobarcode-amplified CRISPR microfluidic platform | CRISPR-Cas12a | single-cell microfluidic chip | telomerase | fluorescent | MOF–DNA biobarcode amplification | single-cell level | high sensitivity, single-cell detection, early cancer diagnosis | ||
| CoHIT | CRISPR-Cas12a | microfluidic chip | NPM1 gene c.863_864 4-bp insertions | fluorescence | enzymatic recombinase amplification (ERA) | ≤0.01% | rapid (30 min), low-cost, multiplex detection, no WT cross-reactivity | ||
| Cas13a-CHA-SERS | CRISPR-Cas13a | silver nanorods (AgNRs) SERS chip | RNA | SARS-CoV-2 | Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) | Catalytic Hairpin Assembly (CHA) | 5.18 × 102 copies/mL | ultrasensitive, high specificity, multiplex potential |
4.3. CRISPR-on-Chip for Personalized Medicine Applications
CRISPR-on-Chip applications have shown great potential for personalized medicine applications. A promising avenue of research is the rapid identification genetic mutations or variations in patients. To this end, a CRISPR-integrated graphene-based field-effect transistor offered digital detection of a target sequence, relevant for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, within an intact genomic sequence. Rapid detection of patient-specific mutations can enable cost-effective and accessible hereditary disease panel development or aid in carrier screening. By achieving single-nucleotide variation discrimination in diseases such as sickle cell disease, CRISPR-on-chip platforms have demonstrated great potential for rapid genetic disease screening. Mutliplex testing can further expand the use of these platforms. Beyond genetic disease diagnosis or carrier identification, this technology can also be translated into minimal residue disease tracking or cancer driver mutation identification. Person-centered therapy has transformed medical oncology with targeted therapies significantly improving patient outcomes. A majority of targeted therapy regimens are guided by the genetic composition of patient tumors, and the rapid identification of cancer driver genes can aid in personalized disease modeling. For example, CRISPR-on-chip platforms have been used to identify EGFR 19del mutations and TP53 hotspot mutations. In addition to identifying driver mutations or variations in patient samples, CRISPR-on-chip can also enable patient-specific drug screening, which can potentially transform therapeutic strategies. By coupling microfluidic organoid cultures with CRISPR biosensors, real-time molecular responses to therapy can be monitored.
5. Current Limitations and Future Perspectives
Molecular diagnostics has been transformed by CRISPR-on-chip technology, which combines the special sensitivity of CRISPR-Cas with the possibility of automation and miniaturization in microfluidic systems. Although CRISPR-Cas-integrated microfluidic chip-based platforms developed in recent years have demonstrated impressive sensitivity and portability, scalability, real-time analysis, and multiple target detection, ,, the need for improvement in clinical applications is still critical, and urgent development needs continue in these areas. Many platforms still require off-chip steps such as extraction or purification, which can introduce the risk of contamination and increase expenses. Fully automated CRISPR-on-Chip platforms that can perform sample processing and purification, signal/isothermal amplification, and final detection in a single step are user-friendly and require minimal equipment, which increases their importance in the future. ,
To overcome the limitations addressed and to satisfy the full potential of CRISPR diagnostics at the PoC level, microfluidic technologies offer a more effective alternative to traditional methods while reducing cost, time, and contamination risks in field tests with automated, miniaturized processes, efficient fluid manipulation, and biosensor integration. , Integrating microfluidic systems with CRISPR-Cas platforms provides sensitive and holistic detection of the relevant deficiencies. In this context, many microfluidic diagnostic platforms have been developed, and electronic and digital microfluidic systems constitute an essential part of the diagnostic field. , At the core of electronic microfluidic platforms, transducers convert biochemical signals into electrical outputs by utilizing the enzymatic reaction of biomolecules immobilized on a specific surface. ,, These platforms provide fast, selective, economical, user-friendly, and real-time monitoring in diagnostics. Digital platforms are based on advanced strategies such as droplet microfluidics and microchamber arrays and offer high sensitivity, minimum reagent usage, and strong integration capability.
For many platforms, achieving low LOD without introducing preamplification steps has remained a core bottleneck of CRISPR-on-Chip platforms. Recent platforms have demonstrated LODs at the femtomolar range in identifying target regions with single-nucleotide accuracy in unamplified genomic samples. CRISPR diagnostics have not only shown high versatility and programmability, but platforms have also demonstrated clinical-grade sensitivity and specificity comparable to RT-PCR (100% negative agreement, 95% positive agreement).
Multiple detection platforms that enable simultaneous analysis of numerous pathogens or nucleic acid/non-nucleic acid–based disease biomarkers on a single platform will become the main focus of future studies in parallel with the developments in microfluidic technology. In addition, more effective programming of the Cas enzyme with combined crRNA and gRNA configurations is critically important. The current trend also seeks to combine CRISPR detection with nanomaterial-based signal amplification (plasmonic nanoparticles, quantum dots, and electrochemical biosensors) to enable attomolar detection limits for low-concentration targets. , Studies have proposed using pressure/vacuum systems to generate droplets efficiently, minimizing sample consumption in multiplexed assays. Multiplexed CRISPR platforms, such as CARMEN, have been developed with the ability to simultaneously differentiate between 169 human-associated viruses using nanoliter droplets, demonstrating high multiplexing capabilities while decreasing cost per test by 300-fold. Such platforms have been further enhanced with microfluidics integration (mCARMEN) and achieved up to 100% sensitivity.
Although CRISPR platforms exhibit undeniable qualities such as high specificity, modularity, and programmability, may prove suboptimal in PoC applications. The main barriers to the widespread use of existing CRISPR-Dx systems are a lack of integration, long preparation time, low detection rate, and low sensitivity. On-chip control and standardization require precise control of reaction temperature, flow rate, and reagent mixing. Achieving such standardization in mass production remains challenging without the development of standardized fabrication protocols. Moreover, numerous infectious diseases continue to spread undetected in many low and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to a lack of easily accessible diagnostic tools at the primary healthcare level. Particularly in low-resource rural settings with limited access to resources, cold-chain requirements create major hurdles in widespread adoption. Laboratory-based diagnostic systems may eventually be replaced by portable, inexpensive, and cutting-edge CRISPR-on-Chip platforms with sensitivity and specificity comparable to PCR. ,, These platforms allow for real-time infectious disease monitoring and can be positioned as a proactive tool in managing possible outbreaks. They also have the potential to provide early diagnosis of cancer and some genetic disorders.
Integrating AL- and DL-based algorithms into CRISPR-on-Chip systems can play an important role in the future of CRISPR-on-Chip diagnostics. Off-target risks have been considered one of the most important challenges associated with CRISPR-based platforms. Data-driven sgRNA models have been used to profile (and predict) off-target activity of sgRNA to optimize Cas9 activity, Similarly, DL-enhanced tools have been developed to predict on-target gRNA activity, enhancing gRNA efficiency prediction. Such applications can be used for on-chip platforms to maximize on-target activity while minimizing off-targets, increasing the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostics platforms.
Besides mitigating off-target effects, AI/ML-based applications can also be used for automated microfluidic design and control. While droplet-based microfluidics holds great potential for screening purposes, there is limited predictive understanding of droplet generation. As a result, processes require time-intensive and expensive fabrication processes. ML has enabled the design automation of droplet-based microfluidic platforms, which can potentially facilitate the widespread and rapid integration into CRISPR-on-chip platforms. Such ML frameworks can be leveraged to optimize droplet generators and flow regimes, expediting diagnostic-platform development.
AI/ML integration can also improve analysis processes. Integrated with smartphone image processing and analysis systems, it can increase fluorescence reading accuracy and automate data interpretation by reducing false positive and negative results. Such pipelines can offer significant advantages in infectious disease control during outbreaks. Given the growing interest and success of smartphone-based DL-enhanced readout interpretations, streamlined workflows have become feasible. In addition, integrating cloud-based systems can enable decentralized PoC healthcare management and real-time patient monitoring. Standardization in sample preparation, device calibration, and result interpretation processes will be a priority of discussion topics in the future. Collaboration between industry, academia, and regulatory agencies will be critical for this technology to reach clinical validity.
6. Conclusions
Integrating CRISPR-Cas-based diagnostic platforms to microfluidic chips, CRISPR-on-chip technology will enable portable, quick, and ultrasensitive PoC diagnosis. They offer some crucial benefits, e.g., low cost, low infrastructure requirements, and compatibility with cutting-edge technologies in demand, so they have revolutionized personalized medicine and infectious disease diagnostics. However, more efficient sample manipulation techniques, signal amplification strategies, and data analysis methodologies based on AL/ML must be developed to raise the adoption of this technology in clinics. As the sensitivity and scalability of CRISPR-on-Chip platforms continue to increase, it is expected to become a strong alternative to conventional diagnostic platforms.
Acknowledgments
S.T. acknowledges TÜBİTAK 2232 International Fellowship for Outstanding Researchers Award (118C391), TÜBİTAK-1001 Scientific and Technological Research Projects (123S582, 123Z050, 225S122, 125Z215), Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellowship for Experienced Researchers, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (101003361), and Royal Academy Newton-Katip Çelebi Transforming Systems Through Partnership Award (120N019) for the financial support of this research. N.A. acknowledges support by EMBO Scientific Exchange Grant (11627) and TÜBİTAK-2218 Domestic Postdoctoral Research Scholarship Project (122C195). Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the TÜBİTAK. This work was partially supported by the Science Academy’s Young Scientist Awards Program (BAGEP), Outstanding Young Scientists Awards (GEBİP), Dr. Nejat Eczacibasi Medicine Incentive Award, IBG Science Medal from Izmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, ELGINKAN Foundation Technology Prize, TGC Sedat Simavi Health Sciences Award, Parlar Foundation Research Incentive Award, Parlar Foundation Technology Incentive Award, and Bilim Kahramanlari Dernegi The Young Scientist Award. This study was conducted using the service and infrastructure of Koç University Translational Medicine Research Center (KUTTAM). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. Illustrations from the Figures were used from BioRender.com.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Hu M.. et al. Integrated CRISPR/Cas12a-Activated Liposomal SERS Amplification in Microfluidic Chips for Ultrasensitive Ampicillin Detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2026;293:118131. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2025.118131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang N.-W.. et al. In situ-forming, bioorthogonally cross-linked, nanocluster-reinforced hydrogel for the regeneration of corneal defects. ACS Nano. 2024;18(33):21925–21938. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c02345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J. S.. et al. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science. 2018;360(6387):436–439. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen J.. et al. CRISPR/Cas12a-Assisted isothermal amplification for rapid and specific diagnosis of respiratory virus on an microfluidic platform. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023;237:115523. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2023.115523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atceken N.. et al. Development and Validation of LAMP Assays for Distinguishing MPXV Clades with Fluorescent and Colorimetric Readouts. Biosensors. 2025;15(1):23. doi: 10.3390/bios15010023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atçeken N.. et al. CRISPR-Cas-Integrated LAMP. Biosensors. 2022;12(11):1035. doi: 10.3390/bios12111035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Dongen J. E., Segerink L. I.. Building the Future of Clinical Diagnostics: An Analysis of Potential Benefits and Current Barriers in CRISPR/Cas Diagnostics. ACS Synth. Biol. 2025;14(2):323–331. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.4c00816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu G.. Advancing CRISPR/Cas Biosensing with Integrated Devices. ACS Sens. 2025;10(2):575–576. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.5c00330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Healey N.. Next-generation CRISPR-based gene-editing therapies tested in clinical trials. Nat. Med. 2024;30(9):2380–2381. doi: 10.1038/d41591-024-00056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledford, H. CRISPR genome-editing grows up: advanced therapies head for the clinic. Nature, 2024. 10.1038/d41586-024-04102-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ledford H.. CRISPR 2.0: a new wave of gene editors heads for clinical trials. Nature. 2023;624(7991):234–235. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03797-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tian T.. et al. An Ultralocalized Cas13a Assay Enables Universal and Nucleic Acid Amplification-Free Single-Molecule RNA Diagnostics. ACS Nano. 2021;15(1):1167–1178. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c08165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Najjar D.. et al. A lab-on-a-chip for the concurrent electrochemical detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in saliva and plasma. Nature Biomedical Engineering. 2022;6(8):968–978. doi: 10.1038/s41551-022-00919-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong X.. et al. Fast and sensitive CRISPR detection by minimized interference of target amplification. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2024;20(7):885–893. doi: 10.1038/s41589-023-01534-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Welch N. L.. et al. Author Correction: Multiplexed CRISPR-based microfluidic platform for clinical testing of respiratory viruses and identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nature Medicine. 2024;30(1):307–307. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02684-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin W.. et al. A Propidium Monoazide-Assisted Digital CRISPR/Cas12a Assay for Selective Detection of Live Bacteria in Sample. Anal. Chem. 2024;96(45):17941–17949. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xia L.. et al. Wide Dynamic Range Multiplex Digital Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat Chip for Rapid Detection and Absolute Quantification of Nucleic Acids. ACS Nano. 2025;19(27):24874–24883. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c03382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar A. S.. et al. Microfluidics as diagnostic tools. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2024;556:117841. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.117841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Z.. et al. Microfluidic space coding for multiplexed nucleic acid detection via CRISPR-Cas12a and recombinase polymerase amplification. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):6480. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34086-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Psaltis D., Quake S. R., Yang C.. Developing optofluidic technology through the fusion of microfluidics and optics. Nature. 2006;442(7101):381–6. doi: 10.1038/nature05060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Squires T. M., Quake S. R.. Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2005;77(3):977–1026. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.977. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Whitesides G. M.. et al. Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. Annu. Rev. Biomed Eng. 2001;3:335–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toner M., Irimia D.. Blood-on-a-chip. Annu. Rev. Biomed Eng. 2005;7:77–103. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.011205.135108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El-Ali J., Sorger P. K., Jensen K. F.. Cells on chips. Nature. 2006;442(7101):403–411. doi: 10.1038/nature05063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yager P.. et al. Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for global public health. Nature. 2006;442(7101):412–418. doi: 10.1038/nature05064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tasoglu S.. Toilet-based continuous health monitoring using urine. Nature Reviews Urology. 2022;19(4):219–230. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00558-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pardee K.. et al. Rapid, Low-Cost Detection of Zika Virus Using Programmable Biomolecular Components. Cell. 2016;165(5):1255–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beebe D. J., Mensing G. A., Walker G. M.. Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology. Annu. Rev. Biomed Eng. 2002;4:261–86. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.112601.125916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagrath S.. et al. Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology. Nature. 2007;450(7173):1235–9. doi: 10.1038/nature06385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X.. et al. Microfluidics chips fabrication techniques comparison. Sci. Rep. 2024;14(1):28793. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80332-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birtek M. T., Atçeken N., Tasoglu S.. Programmable 3DP Microfluidic Bio-Reaction System: Automated LAMP-on-a-Chip. Lab Chip. 2025;25:5506. doi: 10.1039/d5lc00003c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu Y.. et al. Developing biotechnologies in organoids for liver cancer. Biomed. Technol. 2025;9:100067. doi: 10.1016/j.bmt.2024.100067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun L.. et al. Developing organs-on-chips for biomedical applications. Smart Med. 2024;3(2):e20240009. doi: 10.1002/SMMD.20240009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao Y.. et al. Fully integrated and automated centrifugal microfluidic chip for point-of-care multiplexed molecular diagnostics. Biosens Bioelectron. 2024;255:116240. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2024.116240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwai K.. et al. Scalable and automated CRISPR-based strain engineering using droplet microfluidics. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2022;8(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41378-022-00357-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen B.. et al. Powerful CRISPR-Based Biosensing Techniques and Their Integration With Microfluidic Platforms. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:851712. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.851712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ackerman C. M.. et al. Massively multiplexed nucleic acid detection with Cas13. Nature. 2020;582(7811):277–282. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2279-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y.. et al. Split crRNA with CRISPR-Cas12a enabling highly sensitive and multiplexed detection of RNA and DNA. Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):8342. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52691-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ren N.. et al. Specific detection of gut pathogens for one-pot chip based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2024;1318:342886. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2024.342886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y.. et al. Pb(II) inhibits CRISPR/Cas12a activation and application for paper-based microfluidic biosensor assisted by smartphone. Sens. Actuators, B. 2024;398:134732. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.134732. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y.. et al. Reagents-Loaded, Automated Assay that Integrates Recombinase-Aided Amplification and Cas12a Nucleic Acid Detection for a Point-of-Care Test. Anal. Chem. 2020;92(21):14846–14852. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu H.. et al. DropCRISPR: A LAMP-Cas12a based digital method for ultrasensitive detection of nucleic acid. Biosens Bioelectron. 2022;211:114377. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X. et al. A Digital CRISPR-based Method for the Rapid Detection and Absolute Quantification of Viral Nucleic Acids. MedRxiv Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hassan Y. M.. et al. Recent developments and future directions in point-of-care next-generation CRISPR-based rapid diagnosis. Clin. Exp. Med. 2025;25(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01540-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han G. R.. et al. Machine learning in point-of-care testing: innovations, challenges, and opportunities. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):3165. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58527-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ngo, H. T. ; Akarapipad, P. ; Lee, P.-W. ; Park, J. S. ; Chen, F.-E. ; Trick, A. Y. ; Wang, T.-H. ; Hsieh, K. . Rapid and Portable Quantification of HIV RNA via a Smartphone-enabled Digital CRISPR Device and Deep Learning. medRxiv, 2023. 10.1101/2023.05.12.23289911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong Y.. et al. Deep learning-enhanced microwell array biochip for rapid and precise quantification of Cryptococcus subtypes. View. 2024;5(4):20240032. doi: 10.1002/VIW.20240032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bhatia S., Pooja, Yadav S. K.. CRISPR-Cas for genome editing: Classification, mechanism, designing and applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;238:124054. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reardon S.. Treasure trove’ of new CRISPR systems holds promise for genome editing. Nature. 2023;624(7990):17–18. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03697-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azeez S. S.. et al. Advances in CRISPR-Cas technology and its applications: revolutionising precision medicine. Front. Genome Ed. 2024;6:1509924. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2024.1509924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matinvafa M. A.. et al. CRISPR-Cas technology secures sustainability through its applications: a review in green biotechnology. 3 Biotech. 2023;13(11):383. doi: 10.1007/s13205-023-03786-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song R.. et al. The CRISPR-Cas system in molecular diagnostics. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2024;561:119820. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ishino Y.. et al. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J. Bacteriol. 1987;169(12):5429–33. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mojica F. J., Juez G., Rodríguez-Valera F.. Transcription at different salinities of Haloferax mediterranei sequences adjacent to partially modified PstI sites. Mol. Microbiol. 1993;9(3):613–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01721.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gostimskaya I.. CRISPR-Cas9: A History of Its Discovery and Ethical Considerations of Its Use in Genome Editing. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2022;87(8):777–788. doi: 10.1134/S0006297922080090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mojica F. J.. et al. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J. Mol. Evol. 2005;60(2):174–82. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masepohl B., Görlitz K., Böhme H.. Long tandemly repeated repetitive (LTRR) sequences in the filamentous cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1996;1307(1):26–30. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(96)00040-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolotin A.. et al. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology (Reading) 2005;151(8):2551–2561. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28048-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pourcel C., Salvignol G., Vergnaud G.. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. Microbiology (Reading) 2005;151(3):653–663. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27437-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jinek M.. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337(6096):816–21. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nobel Prize Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2020. Nobel Prize Outreach 2025. 2025; Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2020/summary/.
- Yang P.. et al. Research Progress on the Mechanism and Application of the Type I CRISPR-Cas System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25(23):12544. doi: 10.3390/ijms252312544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hryhorowicz M., Lipiński D., Zeyland J.. Evolution of CRISPR/Cas Systems for Precise Genome Editing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(18):14233. doi: 10.3390/ijms241814233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santiago-Frangos A.. et al. Intrinsic signal amplification by type III CRISPR-Cas systems provides a sequence-specific SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic. Cell Rep. Med. 2021;2(6):100319. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yigci D.. et al. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification-Integrated CRISPR Methods for Infectious Disease Diagnosis at Point of Care. ACS Omega. 2023;8(46):43357–43373. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c04422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu Q.. et al. Harnessing noncanonical trans-cleavage characteristics of Cas12 and Cas13a to enhance CRISPR-based diagnostics. Commun. Biol. 2024;7(1):1312. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07000-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li J.. et al. Discovery of the Rnase activity of CRISPR–Cas12a and its distinguishing cleavage efficiency on various substrates. Chem. Commun. 2022;58(15):2540–2543. doi: 10.1039/D1CC06295F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu X.. et al. LbuCas13a directly targets DNA and elicits strong trans-cleavage activity. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2025;9:2141–2154. doi: 10.1038/s41551-025-01424-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tao J., Bauer D. E., Chiarle R.. Assessing and advancing the safety of CRISPR-Cas tools: from DNA to RNA editing. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):212. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35886-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kohabir K. A. V., Sistermans E. A., Wolthuis R. M. F.. Recent advances in CRISPR-based single-nucleotide fidelity diagnostics. Commun. Med. 2025;5(1):252. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00933-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yigci D., Ergönül Ö., Tasoglu S.. Mpox diagnosis at POC. Trends Biotechnol. 2025;43:2427. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2025.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hadi R.. et al. Advancing CRISPR-Based Solutions for COVID-19 Diagnosis and Therapeutics. Cells. 2024;13(21):1794. doi: 10.3390/cells13211794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaminski M. M.. et al. CRISPR-based diagnostics. Nature Biomedical Engineering. 2021;5(7):643–656. doi: 10.1038/s41551-021-00760-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kostyusheva A.. et al. CRISPR-Cas systems for diagnosing infectious diseases. Methods. 2022;203:431–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dara M.. et al. Convergence of CRISPR and artificial intelligence: A paradigm shift in biotechnology. Hum. Genet. 2024;41:201297. doi: 10.1016/j.humgen.2024.201297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Janghorban M.. et al. Recent Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges in Developing Nucleic Acid Integrated Wearable Biosensors for Expanding the Capabilities of Wearable Technologies in Health Monitoring. Biosensors. 2022;12(11):986. doi: 10.3390/bios12110986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atceken N.. et al. Mpox disease, diagnosis, and point of care platforms. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2025;10(3):e10733. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atceken N.. et al. Point-of-Care Diagnostic Platforms for Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023;25(8):2201174. doi: 10.1002/adem.202201174. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xie Y.. et al. Clustered Regularly Interspaced short palindromic repeats-Based Microfluidic System in Infectious Diseases Diagnosis: Current Status, Challenges, and Perspectives. Adv. Sci. 2022;9(34):2204172. doi: 10.1002/advs.202204172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gootenberg J. S.. et al. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science. 2017;356(6336):438–442. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xia Y.. et al. CRISPR-Powered Strategies for Amplification-Free Diagnostics of Infectious Diseases. Anal. Chem. 2024;96(20):8091–8108. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c04363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lesinski J. M.. et al. In Situ Complexation of sgRNA and Cas12a Improves the Performance of a One-Pot RPA-CRISPR-Cas12 Assay. Anal. Chem. 2024;96(25):10443–10450. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou J.. et al. A one-pot, one-step CRISPR platform (CRISPR-one) for nucleic acid detection: Application for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Sens. Actuators, B. 2025;422:136600. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2024.136600. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gu W.. et al. Depletion of Abundant Sequences by Hybridization (DASH): using Cas9 to remove unwanted high-abundance species in sequencing libraries and molecular counting applications. Genome Biol. 2016;17:41. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0904-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang H.. et al. Novel Multimode Assay Based on Asymmetrically Competitive CRISPR and Raman Barcode Spectra for Multiple Hepatocellular Carcinoma Biomarkers Detection. Anal. Chem. 2024;96(50):20004–20014. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X.. et al. An amplification-free CRISPR/Cas13a-powered dry chemistry-based electrochemiluminescence gene sensor for ultrasensitive RNA detection. Sens. Actuators, B. 2025;426:137048. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2024.137048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xiong Y.. et al. Functional DNA Regulated CRISPR-Cas12a Sensors for Point-of-Care Diagnostics of Non-Nucleic-Acid Targets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(1):207–213. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y., Deng F., Goldys E. M.. A simple and versatile CRISPR/Cas12a-based immunosensing platform: Towards attomolar level sensitivity for small protein diagnostics. Talanta. 2022;246:123469. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Avaro A. S., Santiago J. G.. A critical review of microfluidic systems for CRISPR assays. Lab Chip. 2023;23(5):938–963. doi: 10.1039/D2LC00852A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Battat S., Weitz D. A., Whitesides G. M.. An outlook on microfluidics: the promise and the challenge. Lab Chip. 2022;22(3):530–536. doi: 10.1039/D1LC00731A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaur R.. et al. Harnessing the power of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) based microfluidics for next-generation molecular diagnostics. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2024;51(1):896. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09840-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azimzadeh M.. et al. CRISPR-Powered Microfluidics in Diagnostics: A Review of Main Applications. Chemosensors. 2022;10(1):3. doi: 10.3390/chemosensors10010003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao L.. et al. The nucleic acid detection using CRISPR/Cas biosensing system with micro-nano modality for point-of-care applications. Talanta. 2025;286:127457. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.127457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mojtaba Mousavi S.. et al. Recent Progress in Prompt Molecular Detection of Exosomes Using CRISPR/Cas and Microfluidic-Assisted Approaches Toward Smart Cancer Diagnosis and Analysis. ChemMedChem. 2024;19(1):e202300359. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202300359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nafian F.. et al. Emerging microfluidic technologies for CRISPR-based diagnostics: an overview. Anal. Methods. 2025;17:1962. doi: 10.1039/d5ay00063g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niculescu A. G.. et al. Fabrication and Applications of Microfluidic Devices: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(4):2011. doi: 10.3390/ijms22042011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fozouni P.. et al. Amplification-free detection of SARS-CoV-2 with CRISPR-Cas13a and mobile phone microscopy. Cell. 2021;184(2):323–333. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hass K. N.. et al. Integrated Micropillar Polydimethylsiloxane Accurate CRISPR Detection System for Viral DNA Sensing. ACS Omega. 2020;5(42):27433–27441. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silva F. S. R.. et al. SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection by a Cellphone-Based Amplification-Free System with CRISPR/CAS-Dependent Enzymatic (CASCADE) Assay. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021;6(12):2100602. doi: 10.1002/admt.202100602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J.. et al. A Smartphone-Mediated ″All-In-One″ Biosensing Chip for Visual and Value-Assisted Detection. Anal. Chem. 2024;96(39):15780–15788. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c03854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sen A.. et al. Paper-based loop-mediated isothermal amplification and CRISPR integrated platform for on-site nucleic acid testing of pathogens. Biosens Bioelectron. 2024;257:116292. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2024.116292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azad B. K. D.. et al. Inkjet-printed electronics for rapid and low-cost prototyping of digital microfluidic devices using an off-the-shelf printer. Sci. Rep. 2025;15(1):4578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89343-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X.. et al. CRISPR Digital Sensing: From Micronano-Collaborative Chip to Biomolecular Detection. ACS Nano. 2025;19:20427. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c03474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park J. S.. et al. Digital CRISPR/Cas-Assisted Assay for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of SARS-CoV-2. Adv. Sci. 2021;8(5):2003564. doi: 10.1002/advs.202003564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yeh E. C.. et al. Self-powered integrated microfluidic point-of-care low-cost enabling (SIMPLE) chip. Sci. Adv. 2017;3(3):e1501645. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding X.. et al. Sensitive quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples using digital warm-start CRISPR assay. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;184:113218. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J.. et al. Rapid and multi-target genotyping of Helicobacter pylori with digital microfluidics. Biosens Bioelectron. 2024;256:116282. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2024.116282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parvez S.. et al. MIC-Drop: A platform for large-scale in vivo CRISPR screens. Science. 2021;373(6559):1146–1151. doi: 10.1126/science.abi8870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu T.. et al. Coupling smartphone and CRISPR–Cas12a for digital and multiplexed nucleic acid detection. AIChE J. 2021;67(12):e17365. doi: 10.1002/aic.17365. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan H.. et al. Recent advances in centrifugal microfluidics for point-of-care testing. Lab Chip. 2025;25(5):1015–1046. doi: 10.1039/D4LC00779D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peng R.. et al. RT-RPA-assisted CRISPR/Cas12a for rapid and multiplex detection of respiratory infectious viruses based on centrifugal microfluidics. Sens. Actuators, B. 2024;399:134838. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.134838. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xiang X.. et al. Automatic Microfluidic Harmonized RAA-CRISPR Diagnostic System for Rapid and Accurate Identification of Bacterial Respiratory Tract Infections. Anal. Chem. 2024;96(16):6282–6291. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Z.. et al. Palm-Sized Lab-In-A-Magnetofluidic Tube Platform for Rapid and Sensitive Virus Detection. Adv. Sci. 2024;11(23):2310066. doi: 10.1002/advs.202310066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li X.. et al. Rapid, portable, and sensitive detection of CaMV35S by RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a-G4 colorimetric assays with high accuracy deep learning object recognition and classification. Talanta. 2024;278:126441. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L.. et al. High-Throughput and Integrated CRISPR/Cas12a-Based Molecular Diagnosis Using a Deep Learning Enabled Microfluidic System. ACS Nano. 2024;18(35):24236–24251. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c05734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu X.. et al. Plug-and-play smart transistor bio-chips implementing point-of-care diagnosis of AMI with modified CRISPR/Cas12a system. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024;246:115909. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2023.115909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang Y.. et al. Detecting telomerase activity at the single-cell level using a CRISPR-Cas12a-based chip. Lab Chip. 2024;25(1):49–56. doi: 10.1039/D4LC00619D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y.. et al. Microfluidics: the propellant of CRISPR-based nucleic acid detection. Trends Biotechnol. 2023;41(4):557–574. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y.. et al. CoHIT: a one-pot ultrasensitive ERA-CRISPR system for detecting multiple same-site indels. Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):5014. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49414-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J.. et al. Rapid and accurate SERS assay of disease-related nucleic acids based on isothermal cascade signal amplifications of CRISPR/Cas13a system and catalytic hairpin assembly. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024;253:116196. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2024.116196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi J. H.. et al. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-Mediated Amplification-Free Detection of Viral DNAs Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy-Active Nanoarray. ACS Nano. 2021;15(8):13475–13485. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c03975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hajian R.. et al. Detection of unamplified target genes via CRISPR–Cas9 immobilized on a graphene field-effect transistor. Nature Biomedical Engineering. 2019;3(6):427–437. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0371-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balderston S.. et al. Discrimination of single-point mutations in unamplified genomic DNA via Cas9 immobilized on a graphene field-effect transistor. Nature biomedical engineering. 2021;5(7):713–725. doi: 10.1038/s41551-021-00706-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slattery J. R.. et al. CRISPR-powered liquid biopsies in cancer diagnostics. Cells. 2025;14(19):1539. doi: 10.3390/cells14191539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou S.. et al. CRISPR/Cas12a-drived fluorescent and electrochemical signal-off/on dual-mode biosensors for ultrasensitive detection of EGFR 19del mutation. Sens. Actuators, B. 2023;392:134034. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.134034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kohabir K. A.. et al. In vitro CRISPR-Cas12a-based detection of cancer-associated TP53 hotspot mutations beyond the crRNA seed region. CRISPR Journal. 2023;6(2):127–139. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2022.0077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aran K., Goldsmith B. R.. CRISPR quality control on a chip. Nature Reviews Bioengineering. 2024;2(3):194–195. doi: 10.1038/s44222-024-00159-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Broughton J. P.. et al. CRISPR–Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nature biotechnology. 2020;38(7):870–874. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0513-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou L.. et al. Programmable low-cost DNA-based platform for viral RNA detection. Sci. Adv. 2020;6(39):eabc6246. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc6246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Y.. et al. Integrating CRISPR-Cas12a into a microfluidic dual-droplet device enables simultaneous detection of HPV16 and HPV18. Analytical chemistry. 2023;95(6):3476–3485. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c05320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Welch N. L.. et al. Multiplexed CRISPR-based microfluidic platform for clinical testing of respiratory viruses and identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nature medicine. 2022;28(5):1083–1094. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01734-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doench J. G.. et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nature biotechnology. 2016;34(2):184–191. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiang X.. et al. Enhancing CRISPR-Cas9 gRNA efficiency prediction by data integration and deep learning. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):3238. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23576-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIntyre D.. et al. Machine learning for microfluidic design and control. Lab Chip. 2022;22(16):2925–2937. doi: 10.1039/D2LC00254J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lashkaripour A.. et al. Machine learning enables design automation of microfluidic flow-focusing droplet generation. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20284-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee S.. et al. Sample-to-answer platform for the clinical evaluation of COVID-19 using a deep learning-assisted smartphone-based assay. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):2361. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38104-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





