Abstract
Trichoderma harzianum is a filamentous ascomycete frequently applied as biocontrol agent in agriculture. While mycoparasitism and antagonism of Trichoderma spp. against fungal pathogens are well known, early fungal responses to the presence of a plant await broader investigation. Analyzing early stages of plant-fungus communication we show that T. harzianum B97 chemotropically responds to a plant extract and that both plant and fungus alter secondary metabolite secretion upon recognition. We developed a strategy for omics-analysis simulating conditions of early plant recognition eliciting a chemotropic response in the fungus and found 102 genes to be differentially regulated, including nitrate and nitrite reductases. Additionally, the previously uncharacterized Plant Communication Associated (PCA) gene cluster was strongly induced upon recognition of the plant, comprises a palindromic DNA motif and was essential for plant colonization. The PCA-cluster is only present in the Harzianum clade of Trichoderma and closely related to a homologous cluster in Metarhizium spp. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) was detected for PCA-cluster genes by plants, while the cluster in T. harzianum is likely under balancing or positive selection. Hence, the PCA-cluster mediates early fungus-plant chemical communication and may be responsible for the high potential of T. harzianum and closely related species for biocontrol applications.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-33935-2.
Keywords: Trichoderma harzianum, Hypocrea lixii, Biocontrol, Plant protection, Plant-fungus interaction, Secondary metabolism, MAMP (microbe-associated molecular pattern), Interkingdom communication, PCA cluster
Subject terms: Microbiology, Molecular biology, Plant sciences
Introduction
Natural environments harbor a complex community of microorganisms, which fulfill crucial tasks in the carbon cycle and can interact with plants as symbionts1,2 or pathogens3. Climate change and global warming are bringing increased disease pressure, abiotic stresses and promote invasion of plant pathogens in new habitats4,5. Hence, better understanding for knowledge based application of biocontrol agents and biostimulants is required6,7. Fungi as important members of soil microbiomes evolved elaborated mechanisms for dealing with their biotic and abiotic environment in terms of sensing and signaling mechanisms as well as strategies for effective competition and antagonism8,9. Fungal secondary metabolites are thereby of crucial importance for interactions with other microbes, animals and also with plants10.
The abilities of some fungi to antagonize and kill their competitors is applied for protection of plants against pathogens and fungi of the genus Trichoderma are among the most broadly applied for this purpose11. Consequently, this genus also dominates research towards mycoparasitism, plant protection and biocontrol of plant pathogens12,13. Fungi of the genus Trichoderma14,15 are typical inhabitants of the rhizosphere and are found in soils worldwide16. Several Trichoderma species are known as efficient biocontrol organisms and act as important symbionts with plants17,18. They are studied in detail for their capabilities in producing antibiotics, parasitizing other fungi – predominantly plant pathogens – and to compete with deleterious plant pathogens13,16. Beneficial Trichoderma strains further induce root branching, can increase shoot biomass and trigger systemic resistance as well as plant nutrient uptake19.
Among the most important functions for successful fungal plant interaction – beneficial or pathogenic - is the ability to colonize plant roots13,20. Trichoderma spp. are able to efficiently colonize plant roots, although they mostly remain at the outer layers of the plant tissue13,19. Nevertheless, also truly endophytic strains of Trichoderma21,22 are known to associate with plants, including also some T. harzianum strains21,23. Prior to colonization, but also thereafter, specific chemical communication – sensing, interpreting the relevance of chemical compounds and initiating an appropriate response – is required. Fungi communicate with their environment using a broad array of signals24–26. Chemical communication between fungi and plants is essential for interaction and diverse secondary metabolites are known to play an important role in this interplay26. Intriguingly, stressed plants were found to secrete specific compounds attracting beneficial fungi27. Overall, a considerable number of effectors12 and secondary metabolites19 including volatile organic compounds28 are already known to contribute to successful biocontrol. In a plant, recognition of beneficial fungi like Trichoderma spp. leads to metabolic changes29 and the onset of systemic resistance30. Acquisition of nutrients is supported by plant-fungus interactions, also if the requirements for mycorrhiza are not fulfilled.
Despite considerable knowledge on relevant signaling compounds secreted during interaction, one major question of the last decades was how fungi sense the presence of a plant in their environment. A seminal study on plant recognition by the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum provided groundbreaking insights in this respect31,32. It was shown that this fungus chemotropically responds to the presence of a plant and that this response is dependent on a pheromone receptor of the fungus, which was shown to sense a peroxidase of the plant32,33. This research and the developed method open up new possibilities to study plant-fungus as well as other intra- and interkingdom interactions and their determinants34. At the same time, the involvement of a peroxidase in the sensing process suggests that the relevant compounds might be enzymatically modified prior to recognition, a mechanism shown previously for microbial interactions as well35.
The question of how the interaction between a fungus and a plant works is most important if the plant requires protection from a pathogen. A beneficial, protective interaction of fungi with plants is called biocontrol and gains increasing attention as ecological alternative to chemical pesticides. Biocontrol of plant pathogens36 is a complex mechanism: it involves processes from secretion of enzymes to production of secondary metabolites to mycoparasitism on the fungal pathogen37. Trichoderma spp. as well as other fungi applied in agriculture as plant beneficial agents produce a broad array of secondary metabolites38,39. Nevertheless, these fungi (except for a few more problematic species like T. brevicompactum) have a long history of safe application worldwide. No contamination of treated crops has been observed and hardly any negative effects on plants are known. Thereby, not only the fungi themselves, but also their secondary metabolites can be applied in agriculture40. Moreover, investigation of secondary metabolites of Trichoderma and their functions bears the opportunity to identify novel, bioactive compounds potentially useful in medicine and industry41. Considering the genomic equipment of Trichoderma for the task of biocontrol, evolutionary analysis revealed that the core genome of Trichoderma species comprises about 7000 genes and that a considerable number of genes crucial to their well-known functions in litter degradation or secondary metabolism, which are both relevant for biocontrol, was acquired by horizontal (or lateral) gene transfer (HGT)14,42,43. This successful sourcing of advantageous genes by Trichoderma is assumed to be corroborated by their capability of mycoparasitism, which brings them in contact with foreign DNA42. Such feeding activities along with physical association over prolonged periods of time, like for example an association of a fungus with a plant are known to facilitate HGT between eukaryotes44. Additionally, asexual development of fungi, involving unicellular spores, is in agreement with the “weak link hypothesis” for entry of foreign genes into eukaryotic genomes45. Acquisition of secondary metabolite clusters can be particularly beneficial for a biocontrol agent, due to their potential function in communication with the plant and/or fending of competitors or antagonizing pathogens. Nevertheless, the relevance of HGT in eukaryotes remains controversial46,47, and careful analysis is required to exclude for example sequencing artifacts jeopardizing the results48.
For this study on plant-fungus communication, Trichoderma harzianum B9749 was selected for its high efficiency in stimulation of plant growth, which indicates successful and beneficial interaction with plants. Moreover, the strain shows solubilization of phosphate and can alleviate abiotic stresses. Due to its proven efficiency in agricultural applications as biocontrol agent, it was the ideal isolate for studying its communication with a plant in more detail. We show that T. harzianum B97 chemotropically reacts to the presence of a plant and chemically communicates with a living plant as well. Moreover, we found that the ability of B97 to efficiently colonize plant roots depends on a secondary metabolite cluster specifically induced during early plant recognition, which is likely under balancing or positive selection.
Results
T. harzianum is an efficient colonizer of plant roots
T. harzianum B97 was isolated from agricultural soil in France49 and selected for its plant beneficial characteristics. Good colonization of plants by the fungus would indicate efficient communication with the plant50. Therefore, we studied, whether T. harzianum B97 would be able to efficiently colonize plant roots. We analyzed colonization after co-inoculation of wheat seedlings with T. harzianum B97. Staining of roots with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-AlexaFluor488 and confocal microscopy showed efficient colonization of roots by T. harzianum B97 (Fig. 1A).
Fig. 1.
Assessment of T. harzianum B97 – plant interaction. (A) CSLM Microphotograph of uninoculated control roots of wheat (i) and wheat roots with T. harzianum B97 (ii-iv) at the root hair zone and stained with WGA-Alexa Fluor488® showing B97 as green fluorescent colonizing wheat root hairs (iii) or the root surface (iv). (B) Chemotropic indices of T. harzianum B97 to the presence of 1% (w/v) glucose or root exudates of a soy plant. Analyses were done in biological duplicates, at least 400 germlings were counted per experiment. Chemotropic indices showed a statistically significant difference to background levels (p-value < 0.01). Error bars represent standard deviation. (C) Schematic representation of the experimental setup for analysis of plant-fungus communication. Plants were allowed to interact with the fungus for 13 h and harvesting was done before contact. Mycelium for investigation of the transcriptome was isolated from the mycelial growth front (“harvesting area B97”, yellow). For secondary metabolite analysis (SM) by HPTLC the agar slice including cellophane overlay from exactly the same area was excised. For analysis of the response of the plant an agar slice on the other side of the root (green area) was excised in order to avoid interference with fungal metabolites. For control plates the setup and positioning of harvesting areas was exactly the same. (D, E) HPTLC analysis of T. harzianum B97 alone on the plate (TH alone), T. harzianum B97 in the presence of the root of soy plant (THx(S)), the root of soy plant in the presence of the fungus (Sx(TH)) and the root of soy plant alone (S alone). Two different visualizations are provided (D: Visible light after anisaldehyde derivatization and E: Emission at 366 nm) and show differentially secreted metabolites between interaction partners alone and in combination. A representative analysis result is shown. For results of all three biological replicates, see supplementary file 2, Fig. S1.
T. harzianum B97 shows chemotropic response to soybean root exudates
Recognition of the presence of the plant in the vicinity is crucial for initiation of interaction. Moreover, successful interaction with different plant species is a desirable trait for biocontrol agents. Hence, we tested interactions of the fungus with soybean roots in the following, which would show versatility of the strain in plant communication and complement the initial results gained with wheat (Fig. 1A). Recently, attraction of a T. harzianum strain to plant roots was shown27. Hence we wanted to test first, whether T. harzianum B97 chemotropically reacts to the presence of roots of soy plants using their root exudates as chemotropic agent. Optimization of the assay to T. harzianum B97 yielded an optimal working concentration of 0.0025% peptone from casein to support germination without inducing multipolarity. We tested the response of T. harzianum B97 to 1% (w/v) glucose, which resulted in a chemotropic index of 9.66 ± 1.15% and was hence in the range seen previously for fungi32. Subsequent analysis of the chemotropic response to soybean root extracts showed a chemotropic index of 8.32% ± 0.15%, representing low but clearly present response (Fig. 1B). This results further shows that the previously detected chemotropic response is not limited to the Fusarium-tomato interaction system, but a rather general response.
Secretion of secondary metabolites changes in the presence of soy bean roots
As T. harzianum B97 clearly reacts to the presence of the plant, we wanted to test whether chemical communication is initiated as a consequence of recognition. We used conditions as close as possible to those applied in the chemotropic assay, with a low level of carbon source (0.1% (w/v) glucose) and minimal medium nutrients to support growth and still allow plant recognition (Fig. 1C). After 34 h of growth of T. harzianum B97, roots of soybean plants were placed in 3 cm distance of the fungal growth front and incubated for 13 h in the darkness to enable communication. To ensure that communication occurs via the medium or via volatile organic compounds, but not due to direct contact, we only used plates where fungus and plants remained without physical contact at the time of harvesting (Fig. 1C). Thereafter, agar slices were excised from the area covered by the fungus for assessing changes in fungal metabolite profiles as well as from the area opposite of the plant root to analyze alterations in metabolites secreted by the plant (Fig. 1C). Secondary metabolite patterns from the fungus grown without a plant and of the plant in the absence of the fungus under otherwise similar conditions were used as controls.
Indeed, after 13 h of exposure of the fungus to the plant, we observed additional bands appearing in the high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) analysis, reflecting a reaction of the fungus to the plant (Fig. 1D,E). Also the plant secreted additional compounds upon detection of the fungus, which were not present in the assay without the fungus (Fig. 1D,E). Consequently, T. harzianum B97 initiates chemical communication with the soy plant roots within 13 h of co-cultivation.
Transcriptome analysis of early stages of plant recognition
Having confirmed that plant recognition by T. harzianum B97 indeed occurs and elicits a two-way communication, we adapted transcriptome analysis to these conditions by covering the agar surface with cellophane to enable harvesting of the mycelium. Using the same setup as depicted in Fig. 1C enabled us to compare the situation of growth of the fungus alone on the plate versus changes in transcript levels due to addition of a soy plant on the plate. Importantly, cellophane was used in all conditions analyzed for the transcriptome experiment in order to avoid artifacts due to consumption of cellophane (for example mis-regulation of cellulase genes) as a carbon source by the fungus. Due to the high similarity of T. harzianum B97 with the previously sequenced reference strain T. harzianum CBS226.9542 we refer to protein IDs from the respective public genome database at JGI (https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/Triha1/Triha1.home.html) in the following.
Since transcript levels reflect investment of resources for functions important under a certain condition, we checked which functions were represented under the conditions used for secondary metabolite screening and transcriptome analyses. Functional category analysis of the 250 genes with highest transcript levels under the applied conditions showed considerable investments in metabolic functions, energy production and transport among others (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 2.
Functional analysis of gene expression in T. harzianum B97. (A) Functional categories represented among the 250 most abundant transcripts under the conditions of simulated chemotropic response. (B) Major functional categories assigned to genes differentially regulated in the presence of a soy plant. Significantly enriched categories are marked with an asterisk.
Besides the expected enrichment in metabolic functions, energy metabolism and carbohydrate metabolism, we also found that the highest levels of transcript abundance were enriched in functions in stress response (p-value 1.96e-03) and unfolded protein response (p-value 7.89e-04). Additionally, also polysaccharide metabolism was significantly enriched in this highly transcribed gene set (p-value 2.49e-11), with the homologues of the cellobiohydrolases cbh1 and cbh2 comprised in this group (which may in part be due to the presence of cellophane in this assay). These patterns reflect that the chosen conditions indeed represent an environment of low nutrient availability inducing cellobiohydrolases likely due to starvation. Alternatively, regulation of cellobiohydrolases may be elevated due to the availability of cellulosic material present in the cellophane. Nevertheless, these data clearly show that cellulases are not repressed by the low concentration of glucose in the medium, hence not perturbing low nutrient conditions. Consequently, this condition closely resembles the conditions present in the chemotropic assay.
Specific gene regulation in the presence of a plant
Comparison of genes differentially regulated between growth alone on the plate and in the presence of a plant confirmed that our experimental setup captured a very early specific stage of plant recognition by T. harzianum B97 and likely represents the onset of communication. In total, only 102 genes were significantly (p-value < 0.01) regulated more than 2fold (41 down, 61 up) upon recognition of the plant (supplementary file 1), which share functions in energy production, metabolism and transport (Fig. 2B). Genes upregulated in the presence of the plant were enriched in functions of C-compound and carbohydrate metabolism (p-value 1.04e-03), glycolysis and gluconeogenesis (p-value 4.09e-03) and electrochemical potential driven transport (p-value 4.00e-03). Interestingly, the gene set down-regulated in the presence of the plant is enriched in functions in secondary metabolism (p-value 5.03e-04) and drug/toxin transport (p-value 4.26e-03).
Specifically, we detected a nitrate reductase (Triha_507858) and a nitrite reductase gene (Triha_507859) to be up-regulated 17fold or 4fold, respectively upon plant recognition. These genes represent the homologues of the Aspergillus nidulans genes niiA and niaD, which share a bidirectional promotor and play important roles in nitrogen uptake and metabolism51,52. However, the putative homologue of crnA, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter gene associated with this cluster in A. nidulans (Triha1_142220) and the major transcription factor genes responsible for regulation of nitrogen metabolism, areA (Triha1_451) and areB (Triha1_70872), are not significantly differentially regulated under these conditions.
Considering fungus-plant interaction, also the more than 5fold up-regulation of Triha_398864, encoding a homologue of Epl1/Sm1 is interesting. These ceratoplatanin-like proteins play a role in colonization of plant roots and as effectors53. In T. harzianum, Epl1 regulates virulence of the plant pathogen Botrytis cinerea, mycoparasitism as well as plant immunity at early stages of root colonization54,55, which is in perfect agreement with our hypotheses.
Furthermore, transcript abundance of two predicted protease genes (Triha1_541862; 5.3fold down and Triha1_98848; 2.2fold down) is decreased in the presence of plant roots. As two putative terpene synthase genes, tps1 (Triha1_497584; 2.8fold up) and tps11 (Triha1_523651; 3.1fold up) are up-regulated, a role of terpenoid compounds in plant interaction is worth further investigation. Additionally, an as yet uncharacterized non-ribosomal peptide synthase (NRPS, Triha_155805) and a putative polyketide synthase (PKS, Triha_546993) are more than 2 fold upregulated upon plant sensing.
A further, strongly upregulated gene (32fold) is Triha1_36398, which is still uncharacterized and its encoded protein comprises no known domains. However, analysis of putative protein interaction partners using the homologue of this protein in T. reesei using the STRING database56; https://string-db.org; version 11.5) suggests a connection to a predicted ferric reductase, which fits to its genomic vicinity next to a putative ferric reductase (Triha1_76871) in T. harzianum, which is also strongly upregulated and fits to the general picture of gene regulation in B97 upon plant recognition.
We conclude that the recognition of a plant in the environment causes T. harzianum to modulate secondary metabolism, but to also elevate certain metabolic capabilities, notably also nitrogen metabolism which might be beneficial for nutrient exchange with a plant. Although functions in C-compound and carbohydrate metabolism are enriched among up-regulated genes, this gene set does not include the common plant cell wall degrading enzymes. The high expression level of cellulases detected in all analyzed samples (see above) is not significantly altered upon recognition of a plant.
A secondary metabolite cluster strongly up-regulated upon plant recognition
Despite the low number of regulated genes, we still found a strongly regulated gene cluster (Fig. 3A,B), which is silent when the fungus is growing alone, and strongly induced upon recognition of the plant with up to 1000-fold upregulation (Fig. 3B; supplementary file 1). This gene cluster has a size of 15 kb and is located on scaffold 23: 272 000–287 000 in the reference strain T. harzianum CBS226.95 and comprises all seven genes present in this area. We termed the cluster Plant Communication Associated (PCA) cluster which is comprised of Triha1_323871/pca1, Triha1_513502/pca2, Triha1_513502/pca3, Triha1_99174/pca4, Triha1_513504/pca5, Triha1_513505/pca6 and Triha1_513506/pca7. None of the genes in the cluster was previously characterized.
Fig. 3.
Schematic representation of the PCA cluster (A) and its regulation upon recognition of the plant (B). (A) Localization of pca-genes in the T. harzianum genome (JGI mycocosm; https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/mycocosm/home). Approximate position of the PCA-DNA motif is shown with red triangles. (B) RPKM values of transcript levels of pca genes upon growth alone on the plate (orange bars), where transcripts were at very low basal levels (logarithmic scale is shown) compared to transcript levels in the presence of a plant with green bars representing transcript abundance upon recognition of the plant. Values represent means of three biological replicates and error bars show standard deviations. In all cases differential regulation is statistically significant (p-value < 0.01) (C) PCA motif as found in the potentially bi-directional promotors of pca1/pca2 and pca3/pca4.
Interestingly, also a further putative ferric reductase gene related to pca1 is strongly up-regulated upon plant recognition (Triha1_76871; 21.2fold) as is a copper transporter gene closely related to pca2 (Triha1_83588; 30.8fold). Both genes are not located in the genomic vicinity of the PCA cluster.
A SNP analysis of differences between T. harzianum B9749 and the publicly available sequence of T. harzianum (sensu stricto) CBS226.9542 revealed no intragenic, no intergenic and no nonsynonymous SNPs in the region of the PCA cluster. Only one synonymous SNP was detected in 513506 and one in 513501 in the 5’ UTR, hence strengthening the identification of T. harzianum B97 as sensu stricto. Consequently, we will refer to the T. harzianum CBS226.95 protein IDs and sequences hereafter.
In order to gain information on the potential function of the PCA cluster, we performed domain analysis and checked homologous genes in other fungi. PCA1 comprises a NADPH oxidase domain (cd06186) catalyzing the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as a ferric reductase like transmembrane component (pfam01794) and is related to A. fumigatus FRE7, which is regulated by VeA57, upon response to Fe starvation58 and during hypoxia59. PCA2 contains a copper transporter domain (pfam04145), which may be involved in oxidative stress protection or pigmentation and is related to putative low affinity copper transporters in Aspergilli. PCA3 is a member of the transferase superfamily (cl23789), which comprises enzymes that catalyze the first committed reaction of phytoalexin biosynthesis, but also trichothecene 3-0-acetyltransferase. PCA3 represents a homologue of the Fusarium trichothecene 3-O-acetyltransferase Tri101. This enzyme is known to have a function in self-protection of trichothecene producing fungi like Fusarium pseudograminearum60. Although trichothecene production was reported for Trichoderma61,62, predominantly in the Brevicompactum clade63 comprising T. brevicompactum or T. arundinaceum, but not for species of other clades, we checked for the presence of genes associated with trichothecene production. Besides PCA3/Tri101, the T. harzianum genome comprises homologues of the trichodiene oxygenase TRI4 (Triha1_99853), the transcription factor TRI6 (Triha1_514309, distant relationship), the transcription factor TRI15 (Triha1_1233) and the isotrichodermin C-15 hydroxylase TRI11 (Triha1_535230). None of these genes is regulated upon recognition of a soy plant in our experiment (supplementary file 1).
PCA4 contains an NAD/NADP octopine/nopaline dehydrogenase (pfam02317) domain as well as a glutamate synthase or related oxidoreductase domain (cl28234), which may be involved in amino acid transport and metabolism. PCA4 has no homologues in Aspergilli. PCA5 is a major facilitator superfamily transporter (pfam07690), related to a cycloheximide resistance protein. PCA6 belongs to the superfamily of S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferases, class I (cl17173). PCA7 has a Cytochrome P450 domain (cl12078), which may be involved in the degradation of environmental toxins. It is relatead to the Fusarium isotrichodermin C-15 hydroxylase Tri11, but is no direct homologue according to reciprocal best hit analysis. In contrast to Trichoderma brevicompactum62, T. harzianum does not comprise a trichodermin cluster in its genome, as also outlined above. The homologue of PCA7 in A. nidulans, STCF, is a putative sterigmatocystin biosynthesis P450 monooxygenase with a predicted role in sterigmatocystin/aflatoxin biosynthesis.
Due to the tremendous up-regulation of the PCA cluster upon plant recognition, we were interested whether the genes of this cluster or their homologues in T. virens (which has the complete PCA cluster) are regulated in the presence of a plant as well. Therefore, we evaluated and/or re-analyzed available transcriptome data from earlier studies with maize or tomato, which however were carried out with different growth conditions64–68. Moreover, it cannot be excluded that regulation of the PCA genes is host plant specific and differs between maize or tomato and the soybeans used in our study. In most cases, the pca-genes and their homologues in T. virens were not significantly regulated (> 2fold, p-value < 0.05) during plant colonization and were not detected in the secretome associated with plant contact. Only in one study65, down-regulation of four of the seven PCA cluster genes was detected in a hydroponic interaction system in the colonization phase. (for details see supplementary data 1, supplementary file 2). Hence, we conclude that the PCA-cluster is particularly important during early plant recognition under conditions simulating solid phase interaction with the plant, but unlikely to be relevant in later phases of fungus-plant interaction.
The PCA cluster region comprises multiple occurrences of a novel DNA motif
Due to the striking up-regulation of the PCA cluster genes upon plant recognition, we were interested whether a common DNA motif might be present in the promotors of the genes. To this end, we analyzed the promotors of all pca genes for promotor motifs using MEME. Interestingly, we found a palindromic motif 5’YGHGSAADHTTSCDCR 3’ (Fig. 3A, C) in the intergenic regions between pca1 and pca2 as well as pca3 and pca4. This motif is present twice in each region and was not yet characterized in fungi. Scanning the JASPAR database (https://jaspar.elixir.no/analysis) for transcription factors potentially binding to this sequence unfortunately yielded no result. Screening of the whole genome of T. harzianum CBS226.95 yielded 13 additional appearances of this motif in the vicinity of genes with mostly unknown functions, albeit in some cases not up-stream of the ATG, but inside the open reading frame (supplementary file 1). However, none of these motifs resides upstream of a gene or within a gene cluster regulated by the presence of a plant as detected in this study. Hence the PCA motif supposably has a specific function during early plant recognition and/or for sole regulation of the PCA cluster.
The PCA cluster is required for plant root colonization
We further asked whether the early and strong transcriptional response of the PCA cluster genes upon plant recognition would be predictive of a role in colonization, which is crucial for plant-fungus interaction and plant protection26. For construction of deletion strains we chose pca1, the putative NADPH oxidase, since previous work revealed an involvement of ROS – directly or indirectly – in plant-fungus interaction32,33. Additionally, we prepared a null mutant of pca5, encoding a transporter potentially involved in signal compound emission. Both mutant strains were viable and showed no striking growth defects (Fig. 4A).
Fig. 4.
Colonization of soybean roots by T. harzianum B97 wildtype and mutant strains Δpca1 and Δpca5. (A) Phenotype of recombinant strains (Δpca1 and Δpca5, representative plates are shown) grown for 72 h in light on malt extract media. (B) Confocal microscopy images of soybean roots colonized with wildtype (WT), Δpca1 and Δpca5. Images of two independent replicates showing different regions of the roots are presented (replicate A, replicate B). The two panels for each mutant (left panel, replicate A: strains pca1_13Aa and pca5_28Aa; right panel, replicate B: pca1_4Ba and pca5_27Ba) show representative pictures of independent transformants, selected from at least three biological replicates each and several sites of the respective replicate. Uninoculated roots were used as control (“no fungus”). Fungal mycelia on the soybean roots were stained with WGA-Alexa Fluor488®. CLSM micrographs are showing B97 hyphae as green fluorescent colonizing the roots of wildtype but hardly detectable with both mutant strains.
We tested the ability to colonize plant roots by inoculating soybean seeds with the mutant strains or the wildtype and evaluated the presence of fungal mycelia on young roots after 8 days (Fig. 4B). Confocal microscopy was performed from at least three replicate assays and multiple sites per root with two independent deletion strains per mutation. Roots grown from uninoculated seeds were used as controls. This analysis showed that while the wildtype T. harzianum B97 efficiently colonized the root surface of soy plants in addition to those of wheat as shown in Fig. 1A, suggesting this strain as a potential colonizer of a broader spectrum of plant species. Neither Δpca1 nor Δpca5 were able to colonize the root grown from seeds inoculated with the mutant strains and these samples rather resembled the uninoculated control (Fig. 4). We conclude that the requirement of these two genes of the PCA cluster is representative for the importance of this cluster and its upregulation upon plant recognition for efficient colonization of plants by T. harzianum B97.
The PCA cluster is specific to trichoderma and subject to balancing or positive selection
Because of the obvious importance of the PCA cluster for plant recognition and colonization, we were interested in its conservation and evolution in fungi. Since the genomic region of the PCA cluster in B97 did not comprise a notable number of SNPs in comparison with T. harzianum CBS226.95, we will refer to the region in the latter strain in our further analyses and descriptions.
After identifying the genomic area of the PCA cluster in T. harzianum, we performed a blastn analysis with all dikarya genome sequences available at JGI (2140 genomes). These genome sequences cover the group of Sordariomycetes (528 genomes) very well, including numerous strains of the genus Trichoderma, which would allow for association to the well-studied clades of the genus69. All other groups of fungi in JGI mycocosm outside dikarya70 were tested as well, but did not yield homologous sequences. Surprisingly, the search results did not reflect the expected relationships according to the known phylogeny of ascomycetes. Moreover, the cluster was not present in many Trichoderma species. Neither Trichoderma spp. outside of the Harzianum clade nor the common ancestor of the genus Trichoderma, Escovopsis weberi71 or closely related species such as Fusarium spp. had this cluster, as revealed by only partial coverage of the cluster sequence in the genomes. Rather it was scattered among some species in the Sordariomycetes. However, good coverage of the cluster area was detected for Metarhizium species as well as for Pestaliopsis fici (Xylariales72 and Talaromyces islandicus (Eurotiomycetes73 (Fig. 5A and supplementary data 2 in supplementary file 2). All genes present in these fungi had high homologies and very low E-values compared to the genes in T. harzianum CBS226.95 as revealed by blastp analysis (supplementary file 2, supplementary table S7). Using the respective nucleotide sequences covering the whole clusters for phylogenetic analysis and BLAST searches confirmed the close relationship of the cluster sequences (Fig. 5B, C). In case of Metarhizium spp. we found coverage of the cluster for M. anisopliae, M. robertii and M. brunneum, representing the generalist species of the genus74, but not in intermediate or specialist species, which is also the case for other secondary metabolite clusters in specialist species of Metarhizium74. Interestingly, the PCA cluster was not detected previously in Metarhizium75 and does not overlap with the well characterized secondary metabolite clusters responsible for production of destruxin, ferricrocin or other known toxins74,75. Furthermore, this finding suggested, that the PCA cluster was acquired by T. harzianum via horizontal gene transfer (HGT), likely from Metarhizium spp.
Fig. 5.
The PCA cluster, phylogenetic relationships and proteins related to its components. (A) Schematic representation of the clusters detected within selected representatives of Trichoderma spp. and outside the genus Trichoderma. For details on homology of the PCA-cluster homologues in these fungi, please see supplementary table S7 in supplementary file 2. (B) The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. Sequences of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metani1), Metarhizium brunneum (Metbr1), Metarhizium robertii (Metro1), Trichoderma virens (TriviGV28_8_2), Talaromyces islandicus (Talis1), Pestaliopsis fici (Pestfi1), Trichoderma harzianum (Triha1), Trichoderma afroharzianum (TriharT22) and Trichoderma aggressivum (Triag1) originated from JGI mycocosm. (C) Blastp results of the respective protein sequences from T. harzianum B97 against the NCBI nr database with ascomycetes excluded. The top 100 hits for PCA1-7 were screened for most interesting similarities for this table.
Detailed analysis of the ocurrence of the PCA cluster in Trichoderma spp. genomes available in JGI Mycocosm revealed that it is only present in those species of the Harzianum clade of Trichoderma, but not in the evolutionarily younger clades (supplementary data 2 in supplementary file 2). Consequently, we investigated whether the PCA cluster might have been acquired by T. harzianum by HGT, which was obviously not the case. However, we found that the similarity of plant gene products (but not bacterial gene products) encoded in plant genomes like Quercus suber or Carpinus fangipana is due to their acquisition of PCA1, PCA2 and PCA7 homologues from ascomycetes by HGT. Analysis of Tajima’s D as a measure of evolution indicated balancing or positive selection for the proteins within the PCA cluster. For details on these analyses see supplementary material (supplementary data 2 and Fig. S1 in supplementary file 2).
Assessment of potential compounds associated with the PCA cluster
Phylogenetic analysis or blast searches did not reveal a cluster similar to the PCA cluster for which the associated compounds would have been determined. Antismash analysis of the genomic region spanning the PCA cluster did not yield a result, likely because the cluster does not comprise a “core” gene such as a terpene cyclase, PKS or NRPS. Since two genes in a genomic locus separate from the PCA cluster encode a PKS and an NRPS and both are somewhat up-regulated (see above), the cluster could be split with the core genes separated from the cluster. Antismash analysis of this separate locus indicated several possible products with 6-methylsalicylic acid reaching the highest similarity score.
To evaluate the hypothesis of a split cluster, we performed CBlaster analysis76 for identification of similar BGCs in other fungal genomes. In many cases, the species comprising the full or a partial cluster are pathogens like Pyricularia spp. or Colletotrichum spp. (supplementary file 3). While all 7 genes are present in part of Trichoderma spp. and in Metarhizium, many other species only comprise the genes encoding PCA4, PCA5 and PCA6, which hints at these proteins representing the core chemistry.
Comparison of the CBlaster BGC results using Clinker77 was performed to elucidate whether PCA-like clusters in other fungi potentially comprise core genes like such encoding PKS or NRPS as well. As this was not the case (supplementary file 4), it is unlikely that the PCA cluster is split and that the locus comprising an NRPS and PKS encoding gene are associated with the PCA cluster. However, this also leads us to the conclusion that the chemistry responsible for the compound formed by the proteins encoded in the PCA cluster is somewhat cryptic and the alternative that a plant metabolite might be modified by these proteins could be considered.
Discussion
Recognition of plants by fungi is crucial if the actual cry for help in the form of root exudates78 is to be heard. Beneficial fungi of the genus Trichoderma positively impact plants at multiple levels, also using chemicals for achieving their effect26, but most importantly, they trigger the systemic immune response of plants18,79. Hence they are ideal organisms to answer such a cry for help. T. harzianum strains produce a number of secondary metabolites80 with interesting bioactivity including antifungal activity81, most of which are not yet assigned to specific biosynthetic gene clusters.
Although secondary metabolism and the gene clusters involved in biosynthesis of secondary metabolites are well studied in Trichoderma species39,82, the plant recognition specific PCA gene cluster we found in this study was not described before. Also the detected DNA motif, which is likely to be relevant for the regulation of at least part of the cluster genes is still unknown. The enormous extent of the induction of this cluster, which exceeds the changes in transcript abundance of all other regulated genes, indicates that communication with the plant is associated with this induction, which we confirmed with investigation of two crucial genes of the cluster (pca1 and pca5). Moreover, the fact that the presence of a plant elicits a response in terms of secondary metabolite production is in agreement with the finding that the secondary metabolite pattern of T. harzianum B97 is altered in the presence of a plant. Notably, the mutual influence of fungus and plant happens prior to physical contact and hence we cannot exclude the involvement of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, we also found that the PCA cluster is predominantly relevant at the very early recognition stage, but presumably less so upon physical interaction at the contact or colonization stage.
The striking impact of deletion of members of the PCA cluster on colonization of soybean roots strongly supports a function of secondary metabolite(s) either associated with the cluster or modified by one of the encoded enzymes in plant-fungus communication. This early, pre-contact interaction likely initiates a positive reaction of the plant, which fosters colonization by the fungus, as the latter process does not happen anymore if parts of the cluster are removed. Such communication is vital for beneficial interkingdom-interactions, which was also shown for Trichoderma26. The beneficial effects of T. harzianum B97 on plant health are extensive, facilitating commercial application, and may involve an influence of secondary metabolites – including those of the PCA cluster – on innate immunity as shown previously for Trichoderma30. However, as root colonization is a prerequisite for efficient interaction, it can be concluded that the early stage recognition and communication represents the major function of the PCA cluster, rather than interaction upon contact or at stages thereafter. This hypothesis is further strengthened by the very early induction of the cluster, within only 13 h of proximity and without direct contact between plant and fungus. Although the interaction between plant and fungus could be direct by secreted compounds which are sensed and then initiate a response, also the possibility of modification of secreted compounds by the interaction partner (here plant or fungus) and sensing of a thereby specifically modified signal should be considered. Such modifications are common in organismic interactions for example between bacteria and fungi and here a “gain of function” modification would likely be applied35.
Considering the potential reason for the relevance of the transporter PCA5, our analysis of gene regulation patterns specific for early plant recognition by T. harzianum B97 had revealed a significant enrichment of genes involved in detoxification by export, which is likely achieved by transporters. Therefore, we investigated the role of PCA5 in plant interaction and indeed found that this transporter is crucial for colonization. This finding is in agreement with the hypothesis, that the chemical communication with the plant as initiated by induction of the PCA cluster is dependent on export of secondary metabolites serving as signaling molecules by PCA5. Alternatively, PCA5 may be involved in import of plant signaling compounds or even a modified fungal compound, which initiate beneficial communication by the fungus.
As for the contributions of the remaining cluster constituents, the PCA cluster comprises three genes putatively involved in biosynthesis or modification of secondary metabolites. Among the genes regulated in response to the presence of the plant, we found several more putative permeases and transporters, but no gene which might encode a transcription factor. Hence, it remains to be demonstrated, how the coordinated induction of the PCA cluster genes is achieved.
Considering the NADPH oxidase domain of PCA1 which is also essential for colonization, a relevance of an NADPH oxidase involved in ROS production for plant-fungus interaction was previously shown for T. atroviride83. For F. oxysporum, NADPH oxidase was found to be essential for chemotropic response to the presence of a plant33.
While we could clearly show that the plant and the fungus do interact, the compound formed by the PCA cluster proteins or with their contribution remains to be determined. Nevertheless, the predicted function of part of the proteins allows for an estimation of potential outcomes, which may support further analyses: PCA4, as an opine dehydrogenase/synthase, may be involved in condensing an amino acid (often arginine) with an alpha-keta acid such as pyruvate and reduction of the formed imine to a secondary amine. Such compounds are involved in Crown-Gall formation after Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection in plants and to some extent opine-related molecules serve as signaling compounds84. Moreover, such compounds could potentially be methylated and oxygenated by PCA6 and PCA3. Interestingly, fungi can use opines also as nitrogen sources85 and hence the up-regulation of pca4 as well as the nitrogen metabolic genes homologous to niiA and niaD could constitute a coordinated response to nitrogen requiring conditions.
Another possibility is that the fungus may use the compounds to obtain metals from the host – which is corroborated by the presence of the ferric/cupric reductase PCA1 and the copper transporter PCA2 in the cluster. The recently reported mechanism involving opine-type proteins was so far only described for bacteria86. In the bacterial pathogen Staphyllococcus aureus the compound staphylopine (related to opines and derived from pyruvate) is involved in metal acquisition87 in a mechanism which includes specific recognition of the metal bound protein88. According to this hypothesis, an octopine-like compound would be made by PCA4, then methylated and acetylated and exported/imported to the host. Once the metal-bound molecule is re-imported, then the metal reductase would release the metal from the siderophore. While such a process would reflect a form of communication, the presence and (positive or negative) role of such a mechanism in inter-kingdom interaction remains to be clarified.
Besides the mechanism involving the PCA cluster, also its evolution turned out to be interesting. For plant associated fungi, like those of the genus Trichoderma, HGT seems to be a rather common phenomenon, especially concerning genes involved in production of secondary metabolites89. Hence, we tested the hypothesis that the discordance of the phylogenetic trees of the PCA cluster proteins with ascomycete phylogeny might reflect HGT of the PCA cluster. However, this was not the case – in contrast, this analysis suggested that plants had acquired part of the cluster from fungi.
Nevertheless, the similarity of the T. harzianum PCA cluster with that in Metarhizium spp90. suggests potential functionalities beneficial for both fungi. Metarhizium spp. are known endophytes91,92 and insect pathogens infecting hundreds of species93,94. In a tripartite interaction, M. robertsii, which comprises the PCA cluster, transfers nitrogen from insects they had infected to their plant hosts95. A comparable situation was shown for Laccaria bicolor which associates with pine and spruce and transfers nitrogen from collembola in soil to the roots it colonizes96. Recently, an impact of a strain belonging to T. afroharzianum, a species closely related to T. harzianum, on the interaction of a plant with pathogenic insects was shown97,98. Although this interaction was rather indirect via modulation of the gut microbiome, also numerous direct antagonistic effects on insects by Trichoderma are known99. Consequently, an ecological function of Trichoderma comparable to that of Metarhizium shown by Behie and colleagues95 warrants further investigation.
Since availability and uptake of different nitrogen sources – for example from insects, plants or soil - considerably influences secondary metabolism100, the upregulation of the niiA and niaD homologues upon plant recognition in T. harzianum B97 may not only reflect nitrogen transport to the plant, but could also be a sign for increased efforts for production of specific secondary metabolites for plant communication. Upregulation of pca4 under these conditions would also be in line with potential nitrogen provision to the plant, especially since the pH-dependence of the catalyzed reaction under usual conditions of growth of Trichoderma (neutral to acidic) tends to the reverse reaction i.e. the formation of opines101. If indeed the coordinated up-regulation of pca4 and niiA/niaDas a nitrogen metabolic response leads to the production of an octopine-compound, this is likely to be important for fungus-plant symbiosis as postulated by Kong et al.102,. Notably, although several genes associated with secondary metabolism are down-regulated, besides the strong induction of PCA cluster genes, also an NRPS encoding gene and a PKS encoding gene are slightly upregulated. These obvious shifts in secondary metabolism are in agreement with the altered pattern we observed due to the presence of the plant, but further studies are required for confirmation.
Not only chemical communication between fungi and plants represents a current subject of research, the quest for marker genes for efficient biocontrol capabilities already goes on for decades as well. This includes the question of what makes T. harzianum strains better than many other species of the genus. Species of the Harzianum complex are supposed to be the most common endophytic species in tropical trees103, with speciation leading to habitat preferences of soil or endophytism21. Among the Trichoderma spp of the Harzianum clade, which comprise the PCA cluster, there are also endophytically growing ones like T. endophyticum and T. afrasin21. The upregulation of the niiA and niaD homologues, which are involved in nitrogen uptake upon recognition of the plant (nit3 and nit6) indicates that nitrogen metabolism also may play a role in the interaction of T. harzianum with the plant, although potentially also other sources of nitrogen are used than by Metarhizium, which degrades killed insects to deliver nitrogen to the plant95. The PCA cluster could at least in part explain the efficiency of T. harzianum in biocontrol and hence represent a genetic marker for this competence. It is likely to support beneficial communication to the plant at an early stage of colonization, which may involve pretending to be an arriving endophyte delivering additional soil/organic nitrogen. The fact that the PCA cluster is crucial for colonization by T. harzianum strongly indicates that the presence of this cluster in the fungus contributes to the high efficiency of members of this clade in biocontrol applications. Accordingly, microbiome analysis revealed co-occurrence of Trichoderma and Metarhizium species, both sharing the PCA cluster, in the rhizospere at high yielding field sites104 or with banana plants105.
In summary, we developed a strategy to simulate conditions of chemotropic response applicable for transcriptome analysis and detection of relevant secreted metabolites. Thereby, we found the PCA cluster, a putative secondary metabolite cluster essential for the very first stage of communication with a plant and enabling efficient colonization of the root surface (Fig. 6). Evolutionary analysis of the members of the cluster suggested that parts of it is not only relevant to fungi, but also to plants, which have acquired for example a pca1 homologue from fungi by HGT. While revealing an intriguing new aspect of plant-fungus interaction, knowledge on the PCA cluster genes can also be applied to evaluate the specificity of its regulation for prediction of high efficiency biocontrol capacity during strain screening. Thereby, the presence of the cluster as well as its high induction level represent promising features for diagnostic tests in strain screening programs for novel biocontrol agents.
Fig. 6.
Schematic representation of the reaction of T. harzianum B97 to soy bean. T. harzianum chemotropically responds to the presence of a soy plant. Chemical communication occurs both ways due to alteration of the secondary metabolite pattern of both T. harzianum B97 and the soy plant. The PCA gene cluster, which highly similar to a cluster in Metarhizium, is strongly induced upon plant recognition and essential for effective colonization of plant roots and required for efficient colonization. Individual homologues of cluster genes were acquired by HGT by plants from ascomycetes.
Additionally, future identification of the compound produced (or modified) by the genes of the PCA cluster, which facilitates colonization, may support and enhance plant-fungus interaction of diverse biocontrol agents and enable plant-protection of plant varieties with otherwise insufficient response to Trichoderma-based biocontrol agents. In this respect, exploration of the potential production of opin like compounds or enhancement of other nitrogen compounds beneficial for the plant will be a worthwhile research direction. Moreover, future research should also focus on identification of the transcription factor(s) or trans-acting factor(s) binding to the identified DNA-motif to facilitate detailed analysis of the regulation dynamics of the PCA cluster. Such knowledge is also likely to contribute to identification of the produced compound and to subsequent production of this chemical for possible enhancement of biocontrol agents of diverse species.
Materials and methods
Strains and cultivation conditions
T. harzianum B9749 was used throughout the study. For RNA analysis, the strain was revived from long term storage on malt extract agar (3% w/v). Plates containing modified Mandels Andreotti minimal medium106 with 0.1% (w/v) glucose as carbon source were inoculated with 10 µl of spore solution (108 spores/ml) at 28 °C in constant darkness for 34 h. The modified Mandels-Andreotti medium was prepared as follows: The mineral salt solution contained 2.8 g/l (NH4)2SO4 (21.19 mM) (ROTH, Karlsruhe, Germany), 4.0 g/l KH2PO (29.39 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), 0.6 g/l MgSO·7H2O (2.43 mM) (ROTH, Karlsruhe, Germany) and 0.8 g/l CaCl2·2H2O (5.44 mM) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The trace element solution contained 0.250 g/l FeSO4·7H2O (0.899 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), 0.085 g/l MnSO4·H2O (0.503 mM) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 0.070 g/l ZnSO4·7H2O (0.243 mM) (Riedel-de Haen, Seelze, Germany) and 0.143 g/l CoCl2·6H2O (0.603 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) and the pH was adjusted to 2.0 with concentrated sulfuric acid. The culture medium was prepared combining 500 ml mineral salt solution, 480 ml milliQ water, 20 ml trace element solution, 0.0025% (w/v) peptone from casein (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to facilitate germination, 0.1% (w/v) D-glucose (ROTH, Karlsruhe, Germany) as carbon source and 1.5% (w/v) agar-agar (ROTH, Karlsruhe, Germany).
Plates were covered with cellophane in order to facilitate harvesting of mycelia. For recognition analysis, the roots of soy plants in the second leaf stage (19 days old) were washed 4 times with sterile distilled water and were placed on the plates with T. harzianum B97 in 3 cm distance from the growth front. After further incubation for 13 h (corresponding to the time for recognition in the chemotropic assay) in darkness, fungal mycelia were harvested for RNA isolation and agar slices from the same area were excised for evaluation of secreted metabolite production. As controls, plates with fungus but no plant and plates with plant but no fungus were used. Five plates each were pooled per sample and three biological replicates were used.
Construction of T. harzianum B97 deletion strains
Vectors for deletion of pca1 and pca5 were constructed by yeast recombination cloning using hph marker constructs with 1 kb flanking regions as described previously107. Protoplast transformation was used for deletions in T. harzianum B97 parental strain with 10 mg/ml lysing enzymes (Trichoderma harzianum, Sigma # L-1412) and 150 µg/ml hygromycin B (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) for selection. Absence of the gene of interest was confirmed by PCR with primers binding inside the deleted region. In parallel, a PCR with standard primers amplifying tef1 was performed to exclude a false negative result due to insufficient DNA quality or failed PCR assay. A list of primers used is shown in supplementary table S8 in supplementary file 2. The independent mutant strains pca1_4Ba, pca1_13Aa (lacking the pca1 gene), pca5_27Ba and pca5_28Aa (lacking pca5) were used for further analyses and yielded consistent results.
Surface sterilization of seeds and in-vitro culture of soybean plants
The soybeans (Glycine max (L) Merr., variety ES TENOR, Die Saat, Austria) were obtained from RWA Austria. For the surface sterilization, the soybeans were soaked in 70% ethanol for 1 min and then rinsed 3 times with sterile distilled water. Afterwards, the soybeans were transferred into a sterile beaker containing Danklorix (2.8% sodium hypochlorite (w/w), Colgate-Palmolive, Vienna, Austria) and Tween 20 (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and stirred for 3 min. The soybeans were then washed five times with sterile distilled water. The excess water was removed by placing soybeans on sterile paper tissue.
For the pre-germination, the surface sterilized soybeans were placed on sterile paper tissue soaked with tap water and incubated at 26 °C and 16 h light:8 h darkness for 5 days. The seedlings were transferred to the in-vitro culture, which contained diluted Murashige & Skoog medium (to 0.5 concentration; Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, The Netherlands) and 0.8% (w/v) Daishin Agar (Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, The Netherlands) at pH 5.8. The in-vitro cultures of soybean plants were further incubated at the same condition for two more weeks.
Preparation of plant root exudates
After surface sterilization the soybeans were planted in sterilized perlite (premium perlite 2–6, Gramoflor GmbH, Germany). The soybeans were kept in a plant culture room at 26 °C with 16 h light and 8 h darkness. After approximately 3 days of emergence, the plantlets were then allowed to grow for further 2 weeks till the second leaf stage was achieved. The plantlets were recovered from the perlite carefully and washed gently under running water to remove the perlite. Afterwards, at least 300 plantlet roots were submerged in 500 ml sterile milliQ water and kept for 2 days at room temperature. The obtained root exudates were filter sterilized through Thermo Scientific Nalgene Syringe Filter with 0.2 µM pore size and stored at −80 °C.
Isolation of total RNA
For isolation of total RNA, mycelium of the growth front from 5 replicate plates was pooled and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Three biological replicates were used with 5 pooled plates each. Samples were then treated as described previously108 using the QIAGEN plant RNA kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). RNA quality and integrity were checked using Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent). Only high quality RNA was used for further analyses.
Transcriptome analysis and bioinformatics
Sequencing of samples along with cDNA preparation was done in collaboration with VetCORE (Vienna, Austria) using Illumina HiSeq 50 bp single-read sequencing. The software BWA was used for mapping to the genome data of T. harzianum (JGI mycocosm; https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Triha1/Triha1.home.html)42. Quality control of sequencing data was done using FASTQC and Trimmomatic109 was used for trimming of reads. HTseq was applied for read counting110. The software samtools was used for data processing111 and the limma package as implemented in R112 was used for determination of statistically significant differential expression (> 2fold, p-value threshold 0.01) along with the voom method113, quantile normalization, linear model fitting (with lmFit) and empirical Bayes methods of assessing differential expression (with eBayes114;. Comparison of gene expression patterns between biological replicates yielded significance scores of ≥ 0.979 for both sample sets. Sequence data are available at NCBI GEO (Gene expression omnibus) under the accession number GSE229209.
HCE3.5115 was applied to perform hierarchical clustering with default settings and the Poisson correlation coefficient as the similarity/distance measure. FunCat (Functional category) analysis was done with the FungiFun2 online tool116 based on bidirectional best hit analysis with T. atroviride.
Analysis of chemotropic responses
The freshly grown spores from a 4 days old culture were recovered and suspended in 1 ml spore-solution (0.8% NaCl and 0.05% Tween 80). After separation of mycelia by centrifugation through glass wool, the spore solution was centrifuged at 8000 g for 2 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the spore pellet was resuspended in 1 ml sterile milliQ water. For the chemotropism assay, the spore solution was adjusted to 108 spores per ml with sterile milliQ water. Peptone from casein (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as germination stimulator in 0.5% water agar. The concentration of peptone from casein was optimized to 0.0025% (w/v). After 13 h of incubation at 28 °C in darkness, germling orientation was monitored for at least 400 germlings per sample and chemotropic index was calculated as described earlier32.
Analysis of patterns of secreted metabolites
Analysis for alteration of secondary metabolite patterns in the presence of a soy plant was essentially done as described previously24,117. Therefore the same conditions as applied for transcriptome analysis as outlined above were used (Fig. 1C). Application of high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) and data visualization was performed as described in24 except that separation was done with chloroform and 1 mM trifluoroacetic acid in methanol.
Analysis of colonization by T. harzianum B97 and Recombinant strains
Seeds were surface sterilized in 70% ethanol for 7 min and rinsed for 3 min with sterile milliQ water. Seeds were then put onto MEX (malt extract) plates containing either T. harzianum B97, two B97Δpca1 and two B97Δpca5 strains or only MEX without fungus as negative control. Seeds were then placed in sterile magenta boxes containing soil mixture (1:1:1 perlite, sand, potting soil and 25 ml of sterilized tap water), which was autoclaved twice. After 8 days at 22 °C under 12 h light:12 h darkness conditions, plants were harvested, and roots stained in 15 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) containing 5 µg/ml wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-AlexaFluor488 conjugate (Life Technologies, USA) and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C before rinsing three times with PBS.
Eight biological replicates were grown and treated for wild-type and controls, respectively. In case of mutant strains, each of the two independent mutants per gene-deletion was grown in 4 replicates, resulting in 8 replicate assays per mutation. Of those replicates, six were selected for microscopic analysis. On every replicate/root, several sites were monitored to ensure consistency of the results.
All observations were carried out using a confocal microscope (Olympus Fluoview FV1000 with multi-line laser FV5-LAMAR-2 and HeNe(G)laser FV10-LAHEG230-2, Japan). Observations with the confocal microscope were done at objective lenses of 10x, 20x and 40x. Between 20 and 40 X, Y, Z pictures containing 20 to 60 scans were separately taken at 405, 488, 549 nm wavelengths in blue/green/orange-red channels respectively, with the same settings each time and normal light. The image analysis software Imaris was used on the confocal microscope to visualize 3D reconstructions. X, Y, Z pictures from different channels were then merged using the Image J software (version 1.47v), and Z project stacks were then used to create the pictures as described earlier118.
Phylogenetic analysis, clusters, HGT and evolution
For phylogenetic analysis, protein and nucleotide sequences were obtained from the NCBI nr database or the genome sequences available at JGI mycocosm. Sequences were aligned using Clustal X or MEGA7119,120 with default parameters. MEGA7 was used for phylogenetic analysis using standard parameters, the Maximum likelihood method and 1000 bootstrap cycles.
Horizontal gene transfer was analyzed using the python tool HGTphyloDetect121. Blastp was set to at least 1000 hits to cover close and distant relationships. Besides the conventional workflow, also the scripts for close and distant relationships implemented in HGTphyloDetect were tested in every case.
Tajima’s D was calculated using DnaSP6122.
Potential biosynthetic genes and clusters were analyzed using antismash123 as implemented in Galaxy (antismash version 6.1.1)124. Search for similar biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) was performed by CBlaster125. The CBlaster results for the BGCs were compared using Clinker76.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements The headlines from here on are quite confusing. Please check formatting - Acknowledgements, Autor contributions, Funding, Data availability and competing interests should be the same level - please check and amend.
We want to thank Stefan Böhmdorfer for providing access to the HPTLC analysis equipment and to the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna for providing access to microscopy equipment. Further, we want to thank Antonio di Pietro and David Turra (University of Cordoba, Spain) for hosting GL to learn analysis of chemotropic responses in fungi.Soybean samples were obtained from RWA Austria, Korneuburg, which is gratefully acknowledged.Work of MiS and MoS was supported by the Austrian Research Fund (FWF, grant P31464 to MoS), Work of WH was supported by the Lower Austrian Association for research promotion GFF (formerly NFB; grant LSC16-004 to MoS). This research was funded in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [grant DOI: 10.55776/P31464]. For open access purposes, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission.We want to acknowledge the JGI mycocosm for providing multiple fungal genome sequences for free public use, in part prior to publication.
Author contributions
MiS performed gene deletion and confocal microscopy, GL performed chemotropism analysis and RNA isolation, WH performed secondary metabolite analysis, SC supervised confocal microscopy, DG supported colonization analysis, ADZ contributed to editing of the manuscript, JG and RC contributed to bioinformatic analyses and interpretation of the PCA cluster, MoS conceived the study, performed transcriptome analysis and wrote the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to editing, read the manuscript and agreed to publication.
Funding
Work of MiS and MoS was supported by the Austrian Research Fund (FWF, grant P31464 to MoS), Work of WH was supported by the Lower Austrian Association for research promotion GFF (formerly NFB; grant LSC16-004 to MoS). This research was funded in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [grant DOI: 10.55776/P31464]. For open access purposes, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission. We want to acknowledge the JGI mycocosm for providing multiple fungal genome sequences for free public use, in part prior to publication.
Data availability
All data used for this study are available in the manuscript, its supplementary files and at the NCBI GEO online repository under accession number GSE229209.
Declarations
Competing interests
The study was in part funded by Greencell, France.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Harman, G. E. et al. Uses of Trichoderma spp. To alleviate or remediate soil and water pollution. Adv. Appl. Microbiol.56, 313–330. 10.1016/S0065-2164(04)56010-0 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Averill, C. et al. Defending earth’s terrestrial Microbiome. Nat. Microbiol.10.1038/s41564-022-01228-3 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Doehlemann, G. et al. Plant pathogenic fungi. Microbiol. Spectr.10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0023-2016 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bebber, D. P. Range-expanding pests and pathogens in a warming world. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.53, 335–356. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120207 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Raza, M. M. & Bebber, D. P. Climate change and plant pathogens. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.70, 102233. 10.1016/j.mib.2022.102233 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Del Buono, D. Can biostimulants be used to mitigate the effect of anthropogenic climate change on agriculture? It is time to respond. Sci. Total Environ.751, 141763. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141763 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu, X. et al. The legacy of microbial inoculants in agroecosystems and potential for tackling climate change challenges. iScience25, 103821. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103821 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Khan, R. A. A. et al. Bioactive secondary metabolites from Trichoderma spp. against phytopathogenic bacteria and root-knot nematode. Microorganisms10.3390/microorganisms8030401 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Syed, A. et al. Emerging microbial biocontrol strategies for plant pathogens. Plant. Sci.267, 102–111. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.11.012 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rangel, L. I. et al. Fungal social influencers: secondary metabolites as a platform for shaping the plant-associated community. Plant. J.108, 632–645. 10.1111/tpj.15490 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sood, M. et al. Trichoderma: the secrets of a multitalented biocontrol agent. Plants (Basel)10.3390/plants9060762 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ramirez-Valdespino, C. A. et al. Trichoderma as a model to study effector-like molecules. Front. Microbiol.10, 1030. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01030 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tyskiewicz, R. et al. Trichoderma: The current status of Its application in agriculture for the biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens and stimulation of plant growth. Int. J. Mol. Sci.10.3390/ijms23042329 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schalamun, M. & Schmoll, M. Trichoderma – genomes and genomics as treasure troves for research towards biology, biotechnology and agriculture. Front. Fungal Biology10.3389/ffunb.2022.1002161 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Woo, S. L. et al. Trichoderma: a multipurpose, plant-beneficial microorganism for eco-sustainable agriculture. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.10.1038/s41579-022-00819-5 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Druzhinina, I. S. et al. Trichoderma: the genomics of opportunistic success. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.9, 749–759. 10.1038/nrmicro2637 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harman, G. E. et al. Trichoderma species–opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.2, 43–56 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guzman-Guzman, P. et al. Trichoderma species: versatile plant symbionts. Phytopathology109, 6–16. 10.1094/PHYTO-07-18-0218-RVW (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Contreras-Cornejo, H. A. et al. Ecological functions of Trichoderma spp. And their secondary metabolites in the rhizosphere: interactions with plants. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.92, fiw036. 10.1093/femsec/fiw036 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Haueisen, J. & Stukenbrock, E. H. Life cycle specialization of filamentous pathogens - colonization and reproduction in plant tissues. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.32, 31–37. 10.1016/j.mib.2016.04.015 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chaverri, P. et al. Systematics of the Trichoderma Harzianum species complex and the re-identification of commercial biocontrol strains. Mycologia107, 558–590. 10.3852/ (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harman, G. E. & Uphoff, N. Symbiotic root-endophytic soil microbes improve crop productivity and provide environmental benefits. Scientifica (Cairo)10.1155/2019/9106395 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bailey, B. & Melnick, R. The endophytic Trichoderma CABI International (2013).
- 24.Bazafkan, H. et al. Mating type dependent partner sensing as mediated by VEL1 in Trichoderma Reesei. Mol. Microbiol.96, 1103–1118. 10.1111/mmi.12993 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leeder, A. C. et al. The social network: Deciphering fungal Language. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.9, 440–451. 10.1038/nrmicro2580 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Macias-Rodriguez, L. et al. The interactions of Trichoderma at multiple trophic levels: inter-kingdom communication. Microbiol. Res.240, 126552. 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126552 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lombardi, N. et al. Root exudates of stressed plants stimulate and attract Trichoderma soil fungi. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact.10.1094/MPMI-12-17-0310-R (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Joo, J. H. & Hussein, K. A. Biological control and plant growth promotion properties of volatile organic Compound-producing antagonistic Trichoderma spp. Front. Plant. Sci.13, 897668. 10.3389/fpls.2022.897668 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schweiger, R. et al. Insights into metabolic changes caused by the Trichoderma virens-maize root interaction. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact.34, 524–537. 10.1094/MPMI-04-20-0081-R (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Newman, M. A. et al. MAMP (microbe-associated molecular pattern) triggered immunity in plants. Front. Plant. Sci.4, 139. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00139 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Turra, D. & Di Pietro, A. Chemotropic sensing in fungus-plant interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol.26, 135–140. 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.07.004 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Turra, D. et al. Fungal pathogen uses sex pheromone receptor for chemotropic sensing of host plant signals. Nature527, 521–524. 10.1038/nature15516 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nordzieke, D. E. et al. NADPH oxidase regulates chemotropic growth of the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum towards the host plant. New. Phytol. 224, 1600–1612. 10.1111/nph.16085 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Turra, D. et al. Hyphal chemotropism in fungal pathogenicity. Semin Cell. Dev. Biol.57, 69–75. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.04.020 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stallforth, P. et al. Functional modulation of chemical mediators in microbial communities. Trends Biochem. Sci.48, 71–81. 10.1016/j.tibs.2022.07.006 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.He, D. C. et al. Biological control of plant diseases: an evolutionary and eco-economic consideration. Pathogens10.3390/pathogens10101311 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Karlsson, M. et al. Necrotrophic mycoparasites and their genomes. Microbiol. Spectr.10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0016-2016 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lehner, S. M. et al. Isotope-assisted screening for iron-containing metabolites reveals a high degree of diversity among known and unknown siderophores produced by trichoderma spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.79, 18–31. 10.1128/AEM.02339-12 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zeilinger, S. et al. Secondary metabolism in Trichoderma - chemistry Meets genomics. Fungal Biology Reviews. 30, 74–90. 10.1016/j.fbr.2016.05.001 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vinale, F. & Sivasithamparam, K. Beneficial effects of Trichoderma secondary metabolites on crops. Phytother Res.34, 2835–2842. 10.1002/ptr.6728 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shenouda, M. L. & Cox, R. J. Molecular methods unravel the biosynthetic potential of Trichoderma species. RSC Adv.11, 3622–3635. 10.1039/d0ra09627j (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Druzhinina, I. S. et al. Massive lateral transfer of genes encoding plant cell wall-degrading enzymes to the mycoparasitic fungus Trichoderma from its plant-associated hosts. PLoS Genet.14, e1007322. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007322 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Druzhinina, I. S. et al. Several steps of lateral gene transfer followed by events of ‘birth-and-death’ evolution shaped a fungal sorbicillinoid biosynthetic gene cluster. BMC Evol. Biol.16, 269. 10.1186/s12862-016-0834-6 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Soucy, S. M. et al. Horizontal gene transfer: Building the web of life. Nat. Rev. Genet.16, 472–482. 10.1038/nrg3962 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Huang, J. Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotes: the weak-link model. Bioessays35, 868–875. 10.1002/bies.201300007 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Leger, M. M. et al. Demystifying eukaryote lateral gene transfer (Response to Martin 2017 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201700115). Bioessays40, e1700242. 10.1002/bies.201700242 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Martin, W. F. Too much eukaryote LGT. Bioessays10.1002/bies.201700115 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Danchin, E. G. Lateral gene transfer in eukaryotes: tip of the iceberg or of the ice cube? BMC Biol.14, 101. 10.1186/s12915-016-0330-x (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Compant, S. et al. Draft genome sequence of the root-colonizing fungus Trichoderma harzianum B97. Genome Announc10.1128/genomeA.00137-17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lareen, A. et al. Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes. Plant. Mol. Biol.90, 575–587. 10.1007/s11103-015-0417-8 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Brownlee, A. G. & Arst, H. N. Jr. Nitrate uptake in Aspergillus Nidulans and involvement of the third gene of the nitrate assimilation gene cluster. J. Bacteriol.155, 1138–1146 (1983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Johnstone, I. L. et al. Isolation and characterisation of the crnA-niiA-niaD gene cluster for nitrate assimilation in Aspergillus Nidulans. Gene90, 181–192 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gao, R. et al. The evolutionary and functional paradox of cerato-platanins in fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.10.1128/AEM.00696-20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gomes, E. V. et al. The cerato-platanin protein Epl-1 from Trichoderma Harzianum is involved in mycoparasitism, plant resistance induction and self cell wall protection. Sci. Rep.5, 17998. 10.1038/srep17998 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gomes, E. V. et al. Involvement of Trichoderma Harzianum Epl-1 protein in the regulation of Botrytis virulence- and tomato defense-related genes. Front. Plant. Sci.8, 880. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00880 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res.49, D605–D612. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1074 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lind, A. L. et al. Examining the evolution of the regulatory circuit controlling secondary metabolism and development in the fungal genus Aspergillus. PLoS Genet.11, e1005096. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005096 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kurucz, V. et al. Additional oxidative stress reroutes the global response of Aspergillus fumigatus to iron depletion. BMC Genom.19, 357. 10.1186/s12864-018-4730-x (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Losada, L. et al. Large-scale transcriptional response to hypoxia in Aspergillus fumigatus observed using RNAseq identifies a novel hypoxia regulated NcRNA. Mycopathologia178, 331–339. 10.1007/s11046-014-9779-8 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kimura, M. et al. Trichothecene 3-O-acetyltransferase protects both the producing organism and transformed yeast from related mycotoxins. Cloning and characterization of Tri101. J. Biol. Chem.273, 1654–1661. 10.1074/jbc.273.3.1654 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Cardoza, R. E. et al. Identification of loci and functional characterization of trichothecene biosynthesis genes in filamentous fungi of the genus Trichoderma. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.77, 4867–4877 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shentu, X. et al. Tri11, tri3, and tri4 genes are required for trichodermin biosynthesis of trichoderma Brevicompactum. AMB Express. 8, 58. 10.1186/s13568-018-0585-4 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Degenkolb, T. et al. The Trichoderma Brevicompactum clade: a separate lineage with new species, new peptaibiotics, and Mycotoxins. Mycological Progress. 7, 177–219. 10.1007/s11557-008-0563-3 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lamdan, N. L. et al. Secretome of Trichoderma interacting with maize roots: role in induced systemic resistance. Mol. Cell. Proteom.14, 1054–1063. 10.1074/mcp.M114.046607 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Malinich, E. A. et al. Differential expression analysis of Trichoderma virens RNA reveals a dynamic transcriptome during colonization of Zea Mays roots. BMC Genom.20, 280. 10.1186/s12864-019-5651-z (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Moran-Diez, M. E. et al. Host-specific transcriptomic pattern of Trichoderma virens during interaction with maize or tomato roots. BMC Genom.16, 8. 10.1186/s12864-014-1208-3 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Nogueira-Lopez, G. et al. The apoplastic secretome of Trichoderma virens during interaction with maize roots shows an Inhibition of plant defence and scavenging oxidative stress secreted proteins. Front. Plant. Sci.9, 409. 10.3389/fpls.2018.00409 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rubio, M. B. et al. Comparative study of Trichoderma gene expression in interactions with tomato plants using high-density oligonucleotide microarrays. Microbiology158, 119–128. 10.1099/mic.0.052118-0 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Atanasova, L. et al. Two hundred Trichoderma species recognized on the basis of molecular phylogeny. In Trichoderma - Biology and Applications (eds Mukherjee, P. K. et al.) 10–42 (CAB International, 2013). [Google Scholar]
- 70.Grigoriev, I. V. et al. MycoCosm portal: gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.42, D699–704. 10.1093/nar/gkt1183 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.de Man, T. J. et al. Small genome of the fungus Escovopsis weberi, a specialized disease agent of ant agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 113, 3567–3572. 10.1073/pnas.1518501113 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wang, X. et al. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of the endophytic fungus Pestalotiopsis fici reveals its lifestyle and high potential for synthesis of natural products. BMC Genom.16, 28. 10.1186/s12864-014-1190-9 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Schafhauser, T. et al. Draft genome sequence of Talaromyces Islandicus (Penicillium islandicum) WF-38-12, a neglected mold with significant biotechnological potential. J. Biotechnol.211, 101–102. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.07.004 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sbaraini, N. et al. Secondary metabolite gene clusters in the entomopathogen fungus Metarhizium anisopliae: genome identification and patterns of expression in a cuticle infection model. BMC Genom.17, 736. 10.1186/s12864-016-3067-6 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Donzelli, B. G. & Krasnoff, S. B. Molecular genetics of secondary chemistry in Metarhizium fungi. Adv. Genet.94, 365–436. 10.1016/bs.adgen.2016.01.005 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gilchrist, C. L. M. et al. Cblaster: a remote search tool for rapid identification and visualization of homologous gene clusters. Bioinform Adv.1, vbab016. 10.1093/bioadv/vbab016 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gilchrist, C. L. M. & Chooi, Y. H. Clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics37, 2473–2475. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab007 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Rolfe, S. A. et al. Crying out for help with root exudates: adaptive mechanisms by which stressed plants assemble health-promoting soil microbiomes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.49, 73–82. 10.1016/j.mib.2019.10.003 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Harman, G. et al. Benefits to plant health and productivity from enhancing plant microbial symbionts. Front. Plant. Sci.11, 610065. 10.3389/fpls.2020.610065 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Hanson, J. R. The chemistry of the bio-control agent, Trichoderma Harzianum. Sci. Prog. 88, 237–248. 10.3184/003685005783238372 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Guo, R. et al. Structures and biological activities of secondary metabolites from Trichoderma harzianum. Mar. Drugs10.3390/md20110701 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Keswani, C. et al. Unraveling the efficient applications of secondary metabolites of various Trichoderma spp. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.98, 533–544. 10.1007/s00253-013-5344-5 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Villalobos-Escobedo, J. M. et al. The fungal NADPH oxidase is an essential element for the molecular dialog between Trichoderma and Arabidopsis. Plant. J.103, 2178–2192. 10.1111/tpj.14891 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Subramoni, S. et al. Agrobacterium tumefaciens responses to plant-derived signaling molecules. Front. Plant. Sci.5, 322. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00322 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Beauchamp, C. J. et al. Fungal catabolism of crown gall opines. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.56, 150–155. 10.1128/aem.56.1.150-155.1990 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Morey, J. R. & Kehl-Fie, T. E. Bioinformatic mapping of opine-like zincophore biosynthesis in bacteria. mSystems. 10.1128/mSystems.00554-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 87.McFarlane, J. S. et al. Staphylopine and Pseudopaline dehydrogenase from bacterial pathogens catalyze reversible reactions and produce stereospecific metallophores. J. Biol. Chem.294, 17988–18001. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.011059 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Song, L. et al. Mechanistic insights into staphylopine-mediated metal acquisition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 115, 3942–3947. 10.1073/pnas.1718382115 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Spatafora, J. W. & Bushley, K. E. Phylogenomics and evolution of secondary metabolism in plant-associated fungi. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol.26, 37–44. 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.030 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Sheng, H. et al. Metarhizium: an opportunistic middleman for multitrophic lifestyles. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.69, 102176. 10.1016/j.mib.2022.102176 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sasan, R. K. & Bidochka, M. J. The insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium Robertsii (Clavicipitaceae) is also an endophyte that stimulates plant root development. Am. J. Bot.99, 101–107. 10.3732/ajb.1100136 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wyrebek, M. et al. Three sympatrically occurring species of Metarhizium show plant rhizosphere specificity. Microbiol. (Reading). 157, 2904–2911. 10.1099/mic.0.051102-0 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Roberts, D. W. & Hajek, A. E. Entomopathogenic fungi as bioinsecticides. In Frontiers in Industrial Mycology 144–159 (Springer, 1992). [Google Scholar]
- 94.St Leger, R. J. Biology and mechanisms of insect cuticle invation by Deuteromycete fungal pathogens. In Parasites and pathogens of insects (eds Beckage, N. E. et al.) 211–229 (Academic Press Inc, 1993). [Google Scholar]
- 95.Behie, S. W. et al. Endophytic insect-parasitic fungi translocate nitrogen directly from insects to plants. Science336, 1576–1577. 10.1126/science.1222289 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Klironomos, J. N. & Hart, M. M. Food-web dynamics. Animal nitrogen swap for plant carbon. Nature410, 651–652. 10.1038/35070643 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Di Lelio, I. et al. A soil fungus confers plant resistance against a phytophagous insect by disrupting the symbiotic role of its gut microbiota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 120, e2216922120. 10.1073/pnas.2216922120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Monte, E. The sophisticated evolution of Trichoderma to control insect pests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 120, e2301971120. 10.1073/pnas.2301971120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Poveda, J. Trichoderma as biocontrol agent against pests: new uses for a mycoparasite. Biol. Control. 159, 104634. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104634 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 100.Tudzynski, B. Nitrogen regulation of fungal secondary metabolism in fungi. Front. Microbiol.5, 656. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00656 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Müller, A. et al. Putative reaction mechanism of heterologously expressed octopine dehydrogenase from the great scallop, Pecten Maximus (L). FEBS J.274, 6329–6339. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06151.x (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kong, D. et al. Fungus-derived opine enhances plant photosynthesis. J. Adv. Res.75, 65–77. 10.1016/j.jare.2024.11.029 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Chaverri, P. et al. Trichoderma amazonicum, a new endophytic species on Hevea Brasiliensis and H. guianensis from the Amazon basin. Mycologia103, 139–151 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Bandara, A. Y. et al. Soybean roots and soil from high- and low-yielding field sites have different Microbiome composition. Front. Microbiol.12, 675352. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.675352 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ciancio, A. et al. Rhizosphere 16S-ITS metabarcoding profiles in banana crops are affected by nematodes, cultivation, and local Climatic variations. Front. Microbiol.13, 855110. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.855110 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Mandels, M. & Andreotti, R. Problems and challenges in the cellulose to cellulase fermentation. Proc. Biochem.13, 6–13 (1978). [Google Scholar]
- 107.Schuster, A. et al. A versatile toolkit for high throughput functional genomics with Trichoderma Reesei. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 5, 1. 10.1186/1754-6834-5-1 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Tisch, D. et al. New insights into the mechanism of light modulated signaling by heterotrimeric G-proteins: ENVOY acts on gna1 and gna3 and adjusts cAMP levels in Trichoderma Reesei (Hypocrea jecorina). Fungal Genet. Biol.48, 631–640. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.12.009 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Keel, B. N. & Snelling, W. M. Comparison of Burrows-Wheeler Transform-Based mapping algorithms used in High-Throughput Whole-Genome sequencing: application to illumina data for livestock genomes. Front. Genet.9, 35. 10.3389/fgene.2018.00035 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Bolger, A. M. et al. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics30, 2114–2120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Anders, S. et al. HTSeq–a python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics31, 166–169. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Li, H. et al. The sequence Alignment/Map format and samtools. Bioinformatics25, 2078–2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Ritchie, M. E. et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res.43, e47. 10.1093/nar/gkv007 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Law, C. W. et al. Voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol.15, R29. 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Smyth, G. K. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol.10.2202/1544-6115.1027 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Seo, J. et al. An interactive power analysis tool for microarray hypothesis testing and generation. Bioinformatics22, 808–814. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk052 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Priebe, S. et al. FungiFun2: a comprehensive online resource for systematic analysis of gene lists from fungal species. Bioinformatics31, 445–446. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu627 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Hinterdobler, W. et al. The role of PKAc1 in gene regulation and trichodimerol production in trichoderma Reesei. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol.6, 12. 10.1186/s40694-019-0075-8 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Pierron, R. et al. Deciphering the niches of colonisation of Vitis vinifera L. by the Esca-Associated fungus Phaeoacremonium aleophilum using a Gfp marked strain and cutting systems. PLoS One. 10, e0126851. 10.1371/journal.pone.0126851 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kumar, S. et al. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary eenetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol.33, 1870–1874. 10.1093/molbev/msw054 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Thompson, J. D. et al. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res.25, 4876–4882 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Yuan, L. et al. HGTphyloDetect: facilitating the identification and phylogenetic analysis of horizontal gene transfer. Brief. Bioinform10.1093/bib/bbad035 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Rozas, J. et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol.34, 3299–3302. 10.1093/molbev/msx248 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Blin, K. et al. AntiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res.49, W29–W35. 10.1093/nar/gkab335 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.The et al et al. The galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2022 update. Nucleic Acids Res.50, W345–W351. 10.1093/nar/gkac247 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data used for this study are available in the manuscript, its supplementary files and at the NCBI GEO online repository under accession number GSE229209.






