Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Sep 17;100(1):207–229. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04183-0

Oxidative stress-driven disease-associated microglia (DAM)-like polarization in human microglia (HMC3) cells exposed to small-size silver nanoparticles in a transwell co-culture system with neurons (cholinergic differentiated SH-SY5Y) cells in vitro

Bartosz Skóra 1,✉, Konrad A Szychowski 1
PMCID: PMC12858520  PMID: 40960498

Abstract

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are well-established pro-oxidative and pro-inflammatory factors, with the strongest effects observed in smaller NPs. This is particularly important due to the increasing accumulation of AgNPs in the environment and the human food chain in recent years. This accumulation has been correlated with an increased number of neurodegenerative diseases, in which microglia-driven inflammation plays a pivotal role. Importantly, the disease-associated microglia (DAM) phenotype has gained special attention. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the role of small-size AgNPs in inducing a DAM-like phenotype in a transwell co-culture model of human microglia (HMC3) and neurons (differentiated SH-SY5Y) in vitro. Our results demonstrated time- and dose-dependent cytotoxicity of small-size AgNPs in both tested cell models. Moreover, in the transwell co-culture system of HMC3 and differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, exposure to AgNPs led to ROS-dependent inflammation, associated with TLR4 and NF-κB activation, subsequently upregulating DAM-related proteins (e.g., ICAM1, ITGAX, ApoE, and B2M). A time-dependent increase in •NO levels was also observed. Notably, reduced SYN1 and SNAP-25 expression, along with increased CAT, SOD, TRAF6, and TLR4 expression in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, indicates ROS- and inflammation-mediated neuronal dysfunction. These findings indicate that the use of small-size AgNPs should be reconsidered due to their potential neurotoxic effects, but further investigation is necessary in future, using in vivo models.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00204-025-04183-0.

Keywords: Silver nanoparticles, Inflammation, Neurodegeneration, Disease-associated microglia, Neurons

Introduction

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are among the most commonly used nanostructures today due to their high biological activity, particularly their antibacterial properties, even against resistant bacterial strains [as reviewed by Fernandes et al. (Fernandes et al. 2023)]. Consequently, increasing amounts of these nanoparticles have been detected in river water, sediments, and fish tissues, suggesting their potential accumulation within the human food chain (Ihtisham et al. 2021; Mat Lazim et al. 2023). A recent study presented by Babaei et al. (2022) confirmed the bioaccumulation potential of AgNPs along the phytoplankton–zooplankton–fish axis, with bioaccumulation factors (BCFs) reaching approximately 826, 131, and 1000, respectively (Babaei et al. 2022). These findings are significant given the well-documented cytotoxic properties of AgNPs in normal cells, such as human keratinocytes (HaCaT), patient-derived normal human fibroblasts, and intestinal epithelial cells (Franková et al. 2016; Carrola et al. 2016; Gokulan et al. 2020). Notably, numerous studies have demonstrated a size-dependent toxicity of AgNPs, with smaller nanoparticles exhibiting greater toxic effects (Kim et al. 2012; Perde-Schrepler et al. 2019). The induction of oxidative stress—manifested as elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, modulation of antioxidant enzyme activity, and DNA integrity disruption—has been identified as a key mechanism of AgNPs toxicity (Nallanthighal et al. 2017; Mikhailova 2020). Similar effects have been observed in cells derived from the nervous systems of humans and animals, including rat and human embryonic stem cells, mouse microglial (N9) cell lines, and rat-derived astrocytes (Liu et al. 2015; Dan et al. 2015; Gonzalez-Carter et al. 2017). However, data regarding the effects of AgNPs on microglial cells remain inconsistent.

For instance, Sharma et al. demonstrated that green-synthesized AgNPs (using honeyberry extract) induced a protective M2-like phenotype shift in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated human-derived microglial cells (HMC3) (Sharma et al. 2023). This effect may be attributable to the antioxidant properties of the honeyberry-derived extract used as a capping agent for nanoparticle synthesis (An et al. 2020). Conversely, Shang et al. reported that AgNPs impaired the autophagy process in mouse microglial cells (BV2), leading to their pro-inflammatory polarization (Shang et al. 2022). Furthermore, 10 nm AgNPs demonstrated cytotoxicity in a mouse-derived co-culture model comprising BV2 cells, astrocytes (ALT), and differentiated neurons (N2a), resulting in apoptosis, necrosis, and neurodegeneration (Hsiao et al. 2017). In recent years, a growing body of research has linked neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and dementia to the specific polarization of microglial cells, known as disease-associated microglia (DAM) (Deczkowska et al. 2018; Gao et al. 2023). This phenotype is typically associated with fluctuations in the activity of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) during a two-stage process. The first stage (TREM2-dependent) involves increased TREM2 activity, suppression of microglia-specific genes (e.g., CX3CR1, P2RY12, TMEM119, HEXB, Cst3), and upregulation of cytoskeleton- and metabolism-related genes (e.g., APOE, B2M, TYROBP). The second stage (TREM2-independent) is characterized by elevated mRNA expression of genes, such as ITGAX, AXL, and CD9, though knowledge in this area is still evolving (Deczkowska et al. 2018). This phenomenon is particularly concerning given the increasing environmental presence of AgNPs and their ability to bioaccumulate in the food chain, posing potential risks to human health. Importantly, Xiong et al. demonstrated that AgNPs can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in rats, while Trickler et al. showed that AgNPs induce an inflammation-like phenotype in BBB-derived cells, underscoring the need to evaluate the effects of small-size AgNPs on brain-derived cells (Tang et al. 2008; Trickler et al. 2010). Although some studies, such as those by Hsiao et al., have investigated the cytotoxic properties of 10 nm AgNPs in co-culture models of mouse microglia, astrocytes, and neuron-like cells, further research is required, particularly in the context of DAM-related proteins and human-derived cells (Hsiao et al. 2017).

The present study aims to assess the ability of small-size AgNPs to induce a DAM-like phenotype in human-derived cell models in vitro, with a focus on the role of NF-κB in this process. Additionally, a developed transwell co-culture model of human neurons (cholinergic-differentiated SH-SY5Y cells) and human microglial cells (HMC3) was employed to better simulate cell–cell interactions in the nervous system and extrapolate the obtained results.

Materials and methods

Reagents

The fetal bovine serum (FBS), fetal bovine serum heat inactivated (FBS HI), Universal RNA purification Kit, radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer, Fast Probe qPCR Master Mix, and Perfect™ Tricolor Protein were purchased from EURx (Gdańsk, Poland). The phosphate-buffer saline (PBS), DMEM, and DMEM/F12 media were obtained from Corning Life Sciences (Corning, NY, USA). The penicillin/streptomycin, trypsin, all-trans retinoic acid (RA), resazurin sodium salt, acrylamide/bisacrylamide, sodium chloride (NaCl), 4-methyl-N1-(3-phenylpropyl)−1,2-benzenediamine (JSH-23, NF-κB inhibitor), lipopolysaccharide from E. coli (LPS), N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), bovine serum albumin (BSA), 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA), 4-amino-5-methylamino-2’,7’-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM), glycine, Tris–HCl, Tris-Base, hydrochloric acid (HCl), immobilon-P (pore size: 0.45 µm), Tween-20, Triton-X100, paraformaldehyde, goat serum, yellow/green fluorescence latex beads, Millicell® 6-well hanging cell culture inserts, and PVP-coated AgNPs with 5 nm size were purchased from MERCK (Rahway, NJ, USA). The culture inserts compatible with 12-well plates with 0.4 µm pore size (cat. 36012) was purchased from SPL Life Sciences (Pochon, Kyonggi-do, South Korea). The primary anti-TLR4 antibodies were kindly gifted by Proteintech (Rosemont, IL, USA). The lyophilized human brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA).

The results of the physicochemical characterization of AgNPs were presented previously (Skóra et al. 2022). No signs of agglomeration were observed during the experiments. The AgNPs solution was always sonicated (A = 30%, 10 min, RT) prior to being added to the cells. JSH-23 and LPS were purchased in powdered form, dissolved in sterile DMSO, and added to the cells by diluting them in the appropriate medium (1:1000); therefore, the volume of DMSO did not exceed 0.1%.

Cell culture, differentiation, and treatment

The human embryonic microglial cells (HMC3, CRL-3304) and human neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y, CRL-2266) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). HMC3 cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and 0.1% penicillin/streptomycin, while SH-SY5Y cells were grown in DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS HI and 0.1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After reaching confluency, the cells were detached using trypsin and seeded into appropriate culture vessels (as described below).

Mono-culture-based experiments

The SH-SY5Y cells were seeded at a density of 4.5 × 103 cells per well in a 96-well plate [for resazurin reduction, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release level, intracellular ROS level], or 8 × 104 cells/chamber in the eight-chamber culture slides, using a standard culture medium. The cholinergic differentiation of the cells was performed according to the previously published protocol (Skóra and Szychowski 2025). Briefly, after 24 h (D1), the differentiation procedure was initiated by treating the cells with Differentiation Medium #1 (DMEM/F12 containing 1% FBS HI and 10 µM RA); see Fig. 1. After 72 h (D4), the medium was discarded and replaced with Differentiation Medium #2 (DMEM/F12 containing 1% FBS HI, 10 µM RA, and 40 ng/mL BDNF); see Fig. 1. After another 72 h (D7), the differentiation process was completed, and the cells were treated or co-treated with a medium containing tested compounds (as described in each subsection) and/or conditioned medium.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The scheme of the experimental design, using the developed transwell co-culture model of differentiated SH-SY5Y cells (model of neurons) and HMC3 cells (model of microglia). FBS HI fetal bovine serum heat inactivated, RA all-trans retinoic acid, BDNF brain-derived neurotrophic factor

HMC3 cells were seeded at a density of 4 × 103 cells per well for 24-h or 48-h treatments and 3× 103 cells per well for the 72-h treatment in the 96-well plates [for resazurin reduction, LDH release level, intracellular ROS level, nitric oxide (•NO) generation assays], 5 × 105 cells/dish in the ⌀60 mm culture dish (for phagocytosis assay), or 5 × 104 cells/chamber in the 8-chamber culture slides. The cells were allowed to attach for 24 h. After this period, the medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium-containing tested compounds (as described in each subsection).

Transwell co-culture-based experiments

SH-SY5Y cells were seeded in the basolateral chambers of 12-well plates (for RT-qPCR) or 6-well plates (for Western Blot) at densities of 2 × 105 and 3.5 × 105 cells/well, respectively, and subcultured for 24 h. Differentiation was then induced (as described in subsection "Mono-culture-based experiments") and continued until day 7 (Fig. 1). On the 6th day of differentiation, HMC3 cells were seeded separately in the apical chambers of 12-well, or 6-well culture inserts for RT-qPCR and Western Blot, respectively, at densities of 1.5 × 105 cells/well (12-well) or 2.5 × 105 cells/well (6-well). Cells were cultured separately for 24 h. On the 7th day of differentiation, the inserts were transferred into wells, containing neurons (Fig. 1). At the same time, fresh medium containing 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 10 µM JSH-23, or 4 mM NAC—either individually or in co-treatment—was added to the apical chamber for 24 h (RT-qPCR) or 72 h (Western Blot). The conditioned medium (CM) was collected under sterile conditions, frozen at −80 °C, and used for immunofluorescence analysis. The overall experimental setup is illustrated (Fig. 1).

Resazurin reduction assay and LDH release level

The resazurin reduction method and LDH release level assay were performed as described previously (Skóra et al. 2022, 2024a). Briefly, cells were exposed to AgNPs at concentrations ranging from 1 ng/mL to 100 µg/mL in the respective medium (DMEM with 10% FBS for HMC3 cells or DMEM/F12 with 1% FBS HI for neurons) for 24, 48, or 72 h. In co-treatment experiments, cells were treated with 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 10 µM JSH-23, and 4 mM NAC, either individually or in co-treatment, for 24 h. Following the respective treatment periods, absorbance was measured at 490 nm for the LDH release assay, while fluorescence was recorded at an excitation wavelength of 570 nm and an emission wavelength of 590 nm. The measurements were taken, using microplate reader (Molecular Devices, FilterMax F5). Results were expressed as percentages (%) relative to control cells (vehicle-treated) for the corresponding treatment duration.

•NO generation

The •NO generation assay was performed as described by Szychowski et al. (Szychowski and Gmiński 2019). Briefly, 24 h after seeding HMC3 cells in 96-well plates, the medium was removed and replaced with serum-free medium containing 5 µM DAF-FM. The cells were incubated for 30 min, after which the medium was discarded, followed by two washes with warm PBS. Fresh medium containing 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 10 µM JSH-23, or 4 mM NAC—either individually or in co-treatment—was then added for 3, 6, 24, or 48 h. After each time point, fluorescence intensity was measured using a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, FilterMax F5) at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 535 nm. Results were expressed as a percentage (%) of the control (vehicle-treated cells).

Intracellular ROS level

The method was performed as described in a previous study without modifications (Skóra et al. 2024b). Cells were treated with AgNPs at concentrations ranging from 1 ng/mL to 100 µg/mL for 24 to 72 h, or with 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 10 µM JSH-23, or 4 mM NAC—either individually or in co-treatment—for 24 h. After the designated incubation period, fluorescence intensity was measured using an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 535 nm. Results were expressed as percentages (%) relative to the control (vehicle-treated cells).

Real-time qPCR

The method was performed as described by Szychowski and Skóra (Szychowski and Skóra 2024). Total RNA was isolated separately from the apical (HMC3) and basolateral (differentiated SH-SY5Y cells) chambers using the Universal RNA Isolation Kit (EURx, Gdańsk, Poland). The RNA concentration was measured and standardized for each sample (1400 ng for HMC3 and 700 ng for differentiated SH-SY5Y). Subsequently, reverse transcription was performed to obtain cDNA template, using random primers-containing kit, i.e., High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA). RT-qPCR was conducted using specific TaqMan probes and primers targeting the following genes: NFKB1 (Hs00765730_m1), TREM2 (Hs00219132_m1), IL1B (Hs01555411_g1), ApoE (Hs04194724_g1), and B2M (Hs06637353_s1). The threshold cycle (Ct) value for each sample was calculated during the exponential phase, and the ΔΔCt method was used to determine the average fold (Avg. Fold) expression of the target genes. GAPDH (Hs02758991_g1) and RPS28 (Hs02597258_g1) were used as reference genes for differentiated SH-SY5Y and HMC3 cells, respectively.

Western blot

The Western Blot method was performed as described in a previous study without modifications (Skóra et al. 2023a). Protein extraction was conducted 72 h after treatment, separately for the apical (HMC3; microglia model) and basolateral (differentiated SH-SY5Y; neuron model) chambers, using RIPA buffer. Fifty micrograms of protein were loaded onto the gel. GAPDH was consistently used as a loading control after stripping and reprobing the PVDF membranes with the appropriate buffer. The dilutions and manufacturers of the specific antibodies used in this study are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

The primary and HRP-conjugated antibodies used in this study

Primary antibodies Secondary (HRP-conjugated) antibodies
Target (host species) Dilution Producer/Cat. number Target (host species) Dilution Producer/Cat. number

ICAM1

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A20472

Anti-Rb

HRP-conjugated

(Go)

1:2000 ThermoFisher/#31460

IκBα

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A19714

AXL

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A22378

MyD88

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A16889

B2M

(Rb)

1:4000 ABClonal/A11642

ApoE

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A0304

ITGAX

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A1508

PPARγ

(Rb)

1:1500 ABClonal/A11183

IBA1

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A19776

CAT

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A11780

SOD2

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A19576

MAP2

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A22206

ROCK1

(Rb)

1:2000 ABClonal/A11158

TRAF6

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A23385

SYN1

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A5247

SNAP-25

(Rb)

1:1000 ABClonal/A0986

SYP

(Rb)

1:1500 ABClonal/A6344

TLR4

(Rb)

1:1000 Proteintech/30400–1-AP

SOD1

(Mo)

1:570 SCTB/sc-101523

Anti-Mo

HRP-conjugated

(Go)

1:3000 ThermoFisher/#31430

KI67

(Mo)

1:400 SCTB/sc-23900

NF-κB

(Mo)

1:3000 ABClonal/A10609

GAPDH

(Mo)

1:100 000 ABClonal/AC033

The producers, catalog numbers and the applied dilution was also showed

Rb rabbit, Mo mouse, Go goat, HRP horseradish peroxidase

Immunofluorescence

HMC3 cells were seeded in eight-chamber culture slides (SPL Life Sciences, cat. S30118) at a density of 5 × 104 cells/chamber. After 24 h, the medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium-containing 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 10 µM JSH-23, 4 mM NAC, 1 µg/mL LPS, AgNPs/JSH-23, AgNPs/NAC, or AgNPs/LPS. These specimens were subsequently used in the first set of immunofluorescence (IF) staining (IF#1), consisting of TLR4-FITC/NF-κB-AlexaFluor594/DAPI.

SH-SY5Y cells were seeded at a density of 8 × 104 cells/chamber in 8-well culture chamber slides and initially subcultured for 24 h. Afterward, the differentiation protocol was performed as described in subsection "Mono-culture-based experiments" (Fig. 1). On the 7th day of differentiation, the medium was discarded, and the conditioned medium (CM) from HMC3 treatment (containing 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 10 µM JSH-23, 4 mM NAC, 1 µg/mL LPS, AgNPs/JSH-23, AgNPs/NAC, or AgNPs/LPS) was applied for 24 h. These specimens were subsequently used in the second set of IF staining (IF#2), consisting of NF-κB-FITC/Tau-AlexaFluor594/DAPI.

After the designated incubation time, the cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at RT, and washed again twice with PBS to remove any fixation residues. The cells were then permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min on ice and washed three times with TBST. Next, the slides were blocked with 5% goat serum for 1 h at RT, and specific primary antibodies were added to the specimens (for IF#1 and IF#2: mouse anti-NF-κB—cat. A10609, ABClonal, dilution 1:100). After 1 h of incubation at RT, the slides were washed four times with TBST, and the appropriate secondary antibodies were applied for 1 h at RT (for IF#1: goat AlexaFluor594-conjugated anti-mouse—cat. AS077, ABClonal, dilution 1:100; for IF#2: goat FITC-conjugated anti-mouse—cat. AS001, ABClonal, dilution 1:100). After washing with TBST, the cells were blocked again with 5% goat serum for 30 min at RT. Rabbit primary antibodies were then added and incubated for 1 h at RT (for IF#1: rabbit anti-TLR4—cat. 30400–1-A, Proteintech, dilution 1:100; for IF#2: rabbit anti-Tau—cat. 46687T, Cell Signaling Technology, dilution 1:75). The slides were then washed three times with TBST, followed by the application of specific secondary antibodies (for IF#1: goat FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit—cat. AS011, ABClonal, dilution 1:100; for IF#2: goat AlexaFluor594-conjugated anti-rabbit—cat. AS039, ABClonal, dilution 1:100). After 1 h at RT, the cells were washed twice with TBST, and the nuclei were stained with 0.3 µg/mL DAPI for 5 min. The cells were then washed, mounted, and visualized using a confocal microscope (ZEISS LSM700) with blue, red, and green channels. Imaging was performed using 100× (ZEISS EC Plan-Neofluar 10 ×/0.30), 200 × (ZEISS Plan-Apochromat 20x/0.8 M27), and 630× (ZEISS Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.40 Oil DIC M27) objectives. Pseudocolors were applied using ImageJ software. Corrected Total Cell Fluorescence (CTCF) and fluorescence intensity plots were obtained using built-in ImageJ plugins.

Phagocytosis assay: flow cytometry analysis and visualization

The phagocytosis assay was performed as described elsewhere, with modifications (Huang et al. 2016). In brief, HMC3 cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 105 cells per dish in a ⌀60 mm culture dish and incubated for 24 h. After this period, the medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium containing 1 µg/mL of AgNPs, 4 mM NAC, 1 µg/mL LPS, or a co-treatment for either 24 or 72 h. On the day of analysis, the fluorescence of yellow–green latex beads (cat. L1030, MERCK) was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specifically, the beads were opsonized in FBS (1:5, v/v) at 37 °C for 1 h. The resulting mixture was then diluted in DMEM at a 1:1000 ratio (v/v). After the designated treatment period, the medium was discarded, and the cells were exposed to the diluted latex beads for 2 h at 37°C. Next, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed five times with PBS to eliminate residual beads from the cell surface. The cells were then collected by trypsinization and centrifugation (500 × g, 5 min). The pellet was washed once with PBS, centrifuged again, and resuspended in cold PBS on ice. Shortly after, the phagocytic activity of the cells was measured using flow cytometry (BS Accuri C6 Plus) with an FL-1 detector. Autofluorescence was assessed using unstained cells (without beads), and a total of 15,000 cells were analyzed per sample. Results were expressed as the percentage of cells within the phagocytic population, compared to the control. The gating strategy was presented in Supplementary File.

To visualize latex beads uptake, HMC3 cells were seeded onto eight-chamber culture slides at the density of 5 × 104 cells/chamber 24 h before the experiment. The cells were then treated as described above for 24 h, and the phagocytosis assay was conducted as previously described. However, following the washing steps, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washed three times with TBST, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS at 4 °C for 15 min. Immunostaining was then performed as described in subsection "Immunofluorescence" using primary antibodies against β-actin (ACTB, cat. sc-47778; dilution 1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and secondary AlexaFluor594-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies (cat. AS077; dilution 1:100; ABClonal). The nuclei were stained with 0.3 µg/mL DAPI. Observations were conducted using a ZEISS LSM700 confocal microscope at 630 × magnification (Plan-Apochromat 63 ×/1.40 Oil DIC M27).

Statistical analysis

The results are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) from at least three independent experiments (n ≥ 3). Data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, with statistical significance indicated as *, **, and ***, corresponding to p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively. Additionally, a t-test was used to assess statistical differences between respective groups, with significance denoted as #, ##, and ### for p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively. The IC50 curves and R2 values were calculated based on the resazurin reduction assay results using a three-parameter compound vs. response curve.

Results and discussion

In this paper, we have chosen two cell types, i.e., HMC3 cells, which are a well-established, immortalized microglial cell line (a model of human microglia), as well as RA/BDNF-based differentiated SH-SY5Y cells (a simplified model of human neurons). According to the literature, their phenotype makes them appropriate for use in in vitro screening studies (Dello Russo et al. 2018; de Medeiros et al. 2019). Furthermore, a significant increase (by 67%) in the MAP2 protein expression in cells differentiated for 7 days, compared to the non-differentiated SH-SY5Y proves the efficiency of the applied protocol due to the similar expression of this protein in mature neurons (Soltani et al. 2005) (Fig. 6F).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Small-size AgNPs-induced oxidative stress-driven inflammation in co-cultured, differentiated SH-SY5Y cells. The metabolic activity—72 h (A; n = 5, mono-culture-based experiments), intracellular ROS level—72 h (B; n = 5; mono-culture-based experiments), NFKB1 mRNA expression—24 h (C; n = 3; transwell co-culture-based experiments), the protein expression (n = 3, transwell co-culture-based experiments) of ROCK1 (D), CAT (E), IF staining of NF-κB-FITC (green channel) and DAPI (blue channel)—24 h (G); intensity plots showing NF-κB-FITC nuclear translocation (a – h), the protein expression (n = 3; transwell co-culture-based experiments) of TRAF6 (H), IκBα (I), TLR4 (J), SOD1 (K), and SOD2 (L)—72 h after treating differentiated SH-SY5Y cells with 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 10 µM JSH-23, or 4 mM NAC alone, or in co-treatment (AgNPs/JSH-23; AgNPs/NAC) for the indicated time points. For IF experiments, the CM from HMC3 was used. The expression of MAP2 at 0th and 7th day of differentiation is shown to prove the efficiency of the protocol (F; n = 3). The LPS (1 µg/mL), alone or in co-treatment, was used as a positive control for IF staining. The orange arrows indicate the obvious NF-κB translocation. Imaging was performed at 630 × magnification, and the scale bar represents 50 µm. Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistically significant differences compared to the control are denoted as *, **, and *** for p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively (ANOVA, Tukey’s test). Statistically significant differences between specific groups are indicated as ## and ### for p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively (t-test). The non-processed and colored images are available at 10.5281/zenodo.14884681. (color figure online)

Dose-, time-, and ROS-dependent effect of small-size AgNPs in human models of microglia and neurons in vitro

In the first part of our study, we conducted analysis, using a monoculture of microglia and neuron cellular models. To assess cytotoxicity, we employed two complementary methods, i.e., the resazurin reduction assay, which measures cell metabolic activity, and the LDH release assay, which indicates cell membrane integrity and cytotoxicity as well (Weidmann et al. 1995; Vieira-da-Silva and Castanho 2023). Our results demonstrate a time- and dose-dependent effect of small-size AgNPs in both tested cell models. In HMC3 cells, exposure to AgNPs resulted in a significant reduction in metabolic activity at concentrations ranging from 10 to 100 µg/mL across all tested time points, with decreases ranging from 19.41 to 83.31% compared to the control (Fig. 2A–C). A corresponding increase in LDH release was also observed at these concentrations, ranging from 63.81% to a maximum of 90.67% compared to the control (Fig. 2A–C). Notably, after 48 h and 72 h of exposure, even 1 µg/mL AgNPs’ concentration significantly reduced metabolic activity by 9.63% and 24.17%, respectively, compared to the control (Fig. 2B, C). At the same time points, LDH release levels for 1 µg/mL of AgNPs increased by 23.68% and 9.22%, respectively (Fig. 2B, C). The IC50 decreased over time, reaching 48.69 µg/mL (R2 = 0.9709) at 24 h, 13.81 µg/mL (R2 = 0.9906) at 48 h, and 3.30 µg/mL (R2 = 0.9811) at 72 h (Fig. 2A–C). Similarly, in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, a significant decrease in metabolic activity was observed at AgNPs concentrations ranging from 1 µg/mL to 100 µg/mL at all tested time points (Fig. 2D–F). Interestingly, after 24 h of exposure, a significant increase in LDH release was observed, with values reaching 31.59% at 10 µg/mL, 171.17% at 25 µg/mL, and 954.82% at 100 µg/mL (Fig. 2D). However, at 48 h and 72 h, LDH release levels significantly decreased (Fig. 2E, F). The IC50 values remained relatively stable over time, reaching 3.53 µg/mL at 24 h (R2 = 0.9505), 3.19 µg/mL at 48 h (R2 = 0.9637), and 2.53 µg/mL at 72 h (R2 = 0.9745) (Fig. 2D–F).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Dose- and time-dependent pro-oxidative mechanism of action of AgNPs. Metabolic activity (bars; Alamar), LDH release levels (lines), IC50 curves (insets) (A–F), and intracellular ROS levels (G–I) after treating microglia (HMC3, A–C, G–I) and neurons (differentiated SH-SY5Y cells, D–F, G–I) with AgNPs at concentrations ranging from 1 ng/mL to 100 µg/mL for 24 h (A, D, G), 48 h (B, E, H), and 72 h (C, F, I). The IC50 curves and R2 values were calculated based on the resazurin reduction assay results using a three-parameter compound vs. response curve. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 6 for all presented data). Statistically significant differences compared to the control are denoted as *, **, and *** for p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively. All data presented in this figure were derived from mono-culture-based experiments

The highest toxicity was observed at microgram concentrations in both cell types, consistent with previously reported effects of AgNPs on SH-SY5Y cells (Park et al. 2017; Li et al. 2018; Yamaguchi et al. 2022). Importantly, although an increased amount of LDH in the medium is typically associated with the cytotoxicity of the tested compound, our results show the opposite trend at the highest concentrations. This discrepancy may be explained by the high toxicity of AgNPs, which reduces the number of viable cells and/or causes rapid release of large amounts of proteases into the medium following membrane damage. Such effects may interfere with LDH stability and its measurement. This interpretation is supported by the resazurin reduction assay and by the lack of changes in IC50 values over time. Importantly, a similar tendency has been observed in other xenobiotic-related studies, such as the findings presented by Szychowski et al. for triclosan (Szychowski et al. 2019). Conversely, our findings contrast with those of Sharma et al., who reported a protective effect of green-synthesized AgNPs (derived from honeyberry) in HMC3 cells at concentrations between 15.625 and 125 µg/mL (Sharma et al. 2023). Additionally, Gonzalez-Carter et al. demonstrated that AgNPs (49.7 ± 10.5 nm) exhibit anti-inflammatory properties in immortalized embryonic mouse microglia (N9) cell line (Gonzalez-Carter et al. 2017). These discrepancies may be attributed to differences in NPs size and capping agents used in our study vs. cited papers, specifically polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) vs. honeyberry-derived protein corona, respectively. Such factors can directly influence AgNPs uptake, thereby affecting their reactivity and biological impact. However, our results align with those of Sheng et al., who demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in LDH release in HMC3 cells exposed to microgram concentrations of AgNPs, further supporting our findings (Shang et al. 2022).

With observed cytotoxic effects of small-size AgNPs, we next assessed their impact on intracellular ROS levels in both microglia and neurons. Such approach is justified by numerous studies demonstrating the pro-oxidative properties of AgNPs (Kim et al. 2014; Flores‐López et al. 2019). Our results support these findings, indicating that the cytotoxic effects of small-size AgNPs are associated with increased ROS levels in both tested cell lines, though primarily at mild-toxic concentrations. Neurons exhibited a significant increase in intracellular ROS levels across all tested time points at AgNP concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 µg/mL, with increases ranging from 15.42 to 105.68% compared to the control (Fig. 2G–I). A similar trend was observed in HMC3 cells, where ROS levels increased in a time- and dose-dependent manner, reaching a maximum increase of 92.23% at 1 µg/mL after 72 h of treatment (Fig. 2G–I). Consistently, Dayem et al. reported that AgNPs significantly enhance ROS generation in undifferentiated SH-SY5Y cells (Dayem et al. 2014). Guo et al. demonstrated that low concentrations of AgNPs (2 µg/mL) induce ROS production, leading to antioxidant enzyme activation and impaired neurogenesis in rat-derived neural stem cells (NSCs) (Guo et al. 2017). Likewise, Shang et al. found that AgNPs negatively impact microglia, triggering their activation (Shang et al. 2022). However, contrasting results were reported by Hsiao et al., who found that AgNPs at 1 µg/mL and 3 µg/mL did not alter ROS levels in the mouse microglial BV-2 cell line (Hsiao et al. 2017). These discrepancies may be attributed to differences in cell origin (mouse vs. human in our study) and NP size, as smaller AgNPs, like those used in our study, are generally more toxic.

Interestingly, at the highest tested concentrations (25–100 µg/mL), a significant decrease in ROS levels was observed between 24 and 72 h, reaching reductions of up to 75.40% in SH-SY5Y cells and 53.87% in HMC3 cells compared to controls (Fig. 2G–I). We hypothesize that this dose-dependent ROS reduction is a consequence of the severe cytotoxic effects of AgNPs, which lead to a substantial decline in the overall cell population. A similar correlation was observed in our previous studies involving undifferentiated SH-SY5Y cells, human fibroblasts (BJ), and glioblastoma (U-87MG) cells, where high cytotoxicity was associated with decreased ROS levels (Skóra et al. 2022, 2023a, b). In summary, our findings demonstrate that internalization of small-size AgNPs in both neuronal and microglial models disrupts redox homeostasis, ultimately leading to cytotoxicity. Based on these results, as well as IC₅₀ parameters over the course of treatment, we selected 1 µg/mL AgNPs as a biologically active yet non-lethal dose, allowing further evaluation of small-size AgNP effects in the context of neuroinflammation and DAM-like phenotype induction. Moreover, a recent meta-analysis by Janzadeh et al., which reviewed 26 full research papers, demonstrated that AgNPs induce neurotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner at microgram-per-kilogram concentrations in animal models (Janzadeh et al. 2022). Similarly, Skalska et al. reported significant deposition of AgNPs in rat brain tissue at microgram concentrations, which was associated with synaptic dysfunction (Skalska et al. 2015).

AgNPs affect the antioxidant system-related proteins as well as TLR4 expression in HMC3 cells

Since ROS overproduction can lead to oxidative stress, which subsequently acts as a trigger factor for inflammation, we included two additional compounds in our experimental design: a nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) selective inhibitor (JSH-23) as well as NAC, a potent antioxidant (Dodd et al. 2008; Rangaraju et al. 2018). A 24 h co-treatment of HMC3 cells in a monoculture with either AgNPs/JSH-23 or AgNPs/NAC did not result in significant differences in metabolic activity compared to AgNP-treated cells (Fig. 3A). However, after 24 h, intracellular ROS levels significantly decreased in NAC-treated cells as well as in AgNPs/NAC- and AgNPs/JSH-23-co-treated cells (Fig. 3B). These findings suggest that ROS induced by small-size AgNPs may contribute to oxidative stress, which in turn could serve as a primary pro-inflammatory factor in HMC3 cells.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

AgNP-induced impairment of •NO homeostasis, coupled with TLR4 activation in microglial cells in vitro. Metabolic activity—24 h (A; n = 5), intracellular ROS levels—24 h (B; n = 5), IF staining of TLR4-FITC (green channel), DAPI (blue channel), and Corrected Total Cell Fluorescence measurements (D; n = 40); CAT (E) and SOD1 (F) protein expression—72 h (n = 3); as well as •NO generation levels—3 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h (G–J; n = 6) after treating the HMC3 cells with 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 10 µM JSH-23, or 4 mM NAC alone, or in co-treatment (AgNPs/JSH-23; AgNPs/NAC) for the indicated time points (transwell co-culture-based experiments). A schematic summary of the results is presented in the upper-right corner (C). LPS (1 µg/mL), alone or in co-treatment, was used as a positive control for IF staining. Imaging was performed at 200 × magnification, and the scale bar represents 100 µm. Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistically significant differences compared to the control are denoted as *, **, and *** for p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively (ANOVA, Tukey’s test). Statistically significant differences between specific groups are indicated as ## and ### for p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively (t-test). The non-processed and edited images are available at 10.5281/zenodo.14756605. (color figure online)

In the next phase of our study, we established a transwell co-culture system of microglia (HMC3) and neurons (differentiated SH-SY5Y cells) to better simulate cell–cell interactions in AgNP-driven effects and facilitate future extrapolation of the results. To further investigate the hypothesis of AgNP-induced oxidative stress, we assessed the protein expression of two key antioxidant enzymes—catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1)—following long-term treatment (72 h) (Yilgor and Demir 2024). Our results revealed a significant increase in SOD1 protein expression by 33.57%, 45.51%, and 28.18% in HMC3 cells treated with AgNPs, JSH-23, and AgNPs/JSH-23, respectively, compared to the control (Fig. 3F). However, co-treatment with AgNPs and NAC abolished this effect (Fig. 3F). In contrast, CAT protein expression did not show significant changes in AgNPs-, JSH-23-, or AgNPs/JSH-23-treated cells. Notably, a substantial decrease in CAT expression was observed in NAC-treated (47.28% reduction) and AgNPs/NAC-co-treated cells (34.15% reduction) (Fig. 3E). These results confirm that small-size AgNPs induce oxidative stress in HMC3 cells co-cultured with a simplified neuron model, as demonstrated by the reversal of effects upon NAC co-treatment. Although no previous studies have conducted an in-depth analysis of AgNPs’ effects on microglia, particularly regarding CAT and SOD1 protein expression, numerous studies support the mechanism we propose. Fang et al. reported increased CAT, SOD, and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity in AgNP-treated hepatoma (HepG2) cells, while Vahabirad et al. observed oxidative stress-characteristic changes in CAT and SOD activity in the human breast cancer (SK-BR-3) cells (Fang et al. 2019; Vahabirad et al. 2024). Conversely, Docea et al. found that AgNPs exhibited antioxidant effects in male Wistar rats, as evidenced by total antioxidant capacity measurements (Docea et al. 2020). Moreover, Gonzalez-Carter et al. suggested that AgNPs have mitigating properties in LPS-stimulated N9 cells (Gonzalez-Carter et al. 2017). The discrepancies between these studies and our findings may be due to differences in the tested models, type of cells (liver, breast, or neuronal), or in nanoparticle size, which is significantly smaller in our study. Interestingly, the lack of significant changes in CAT activity in our study may be attributed to AgNPs’ ability to form an inhibitory complex with CAT, as first demonstrated by Liu et al. (Liu et al. 2020). Additionally, the observed increase in SOD1 protein expression following treatment or co-treatment with JSH-23 may be related to prolonged NF-κB inhibition (72 h), leading to secondary ROS generation as a result of cellular stress.

Given the reports, ROS can regulate specific inflammation-related proteins, such as Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), whose well-known external ligand is LPS (Kong et al. 2010). Deng et al. further demonstrated that TLR4 activation triggers the activity of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), an enzyme responsible for •NO synthesis, resulting in elevated •NO levels (Deng et al. 2015). Moreover, ROS can affect NOS activity in a dose-dependent manner as presented by Sun et al. (Sun et al. 2010). In addition to bacterial-derived LPS, several other TLR4 ligands have been identified as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) (Chen et al. 2009; Fang et al. 2011; Ma et al. 2017; Oseni et al. 2023). Our findings demonstrate a time-dependent increase in intracellular •NO levels in HMC3 cells treated with 1 µg/mL AgNPs: 260.64% after 3 h, 292.29% after 6 h, 499.67% after 24 h, and 526.14% after 48 h, compared to the control (Fig. 3G–J). This effect correlates with ROS and NF-κB activity, as evidenced by the attenuation of AgNP effects following co-treatment with either JSH-23 or NAC (Fig. 3G–J). Importantly, enhanced TLR4 protein expression was observed in AgNP- and LPS-treated cells, as well as in AgNPs/JSH-23-, AgNPs/NAC-, and AgNPs/LPS-co-treated HMC3 cells (Fig. 3D). These findings suggest that AgNPs uptake induces oxidative stress, leading to increased antioxidant enzyme expression and TLR4 activation, ultimately resulting in inflammation and •NO synthesis. However, this effect may also be influenced by cytokine and/or DAMP secretion, as neither NAC nor JSH-23 fully abolished AgNPs effects at the TLR4 level. Although we did not quantify specific cytokine secretion—which would have allowed us to make the above statement, Yang et al. reported increased pro-inflammatory interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) levels in human blood monocytes in response to the AgNPs (Yang et al. 2012). Similarly, Li et al. demonstrated that AgNPs cause liver damage in mice, leading to mitochondrial release, which is considered a form of DAMP signaling (Li et al. 2021). Consequently, our subsequent analyses focused on ROS-, •NO-, and potential TLR4-mediated downstream activation in 2D co-culture models, as well as their roles in DAM-like phenotypes and inflammation induced by treatment with small-size AgNPs.

Oxidative stress-driven AgNPs-induced DAM-like phenotype in co-cultured microglia in vitro model

The activation of NF-κB is tightly regulated by its translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where it controls the expression of inflammation-related genes (Tak and Firestein 2001; Badimon et al. 2020). Prolonged NF-κB activation, driven by sustained oxidative stress and inflammatory stimuli, may contribute to the induction of the DAM phenotype, reinforcing a neuroinflammatory state in microglia (Muzio et al. 2021). Our results showed that, just 90 min after treatment, AgNPs caused an increased fluorescence level of this protein in the nucleus of HMC3 cells (Fig. 4D, a). Interestingly, NAC prevented the nuclear translocation of NF-κB, indicating a primary role of ROS in the observed effect (Fig. 4D, e, f). This was further supported by our co-treatment experiments using JSH-23, which reduced nuclear fluorescence of NF-κB but did not entirely block its translocation after 90 min of treatment (Fig. 4D, c, d). Our further analysis focused on determining the expression of inflammation-related mRNAs regulated by NF-κB, particularly NFKB1 and IL1B, to fully elucidate the mechanism of AgNPs action. After 24 h, NFKB1 mRNA expression was not significantly altered in AgNP-treated microglial cells (Fig. 4I). However, a 12.13% increase in IL1B mRNA expression was observed, compared to the control (Fig. 4III). Notably, co-treatment with AgNPs/NAC reversed the effect of AgNPs, leading to a significant decrease in NFKB1 gene expression by 29.04%, compared to the control (Fig. 4I). Similarly, co-treatment with either AgNPs/JSH-23 or AgNPs/NAC reversed or abolished the AgNP-induced increase in IL1B mRNA expression (Fig. 4III). Since IL1B transcription is regulated by NF-κB, these findings further support our hypothesis that AgNP-induced oxidative stress leads to NF-κB translocation and activation of specific genes, such as IL1B, a pro-inflammatory cytokine (Diep et al. 2022). Although our study is the first to demonstrate the pro-inflammatory properties of AgNPs in human microglial cells, the previous research has reported similar effects in in vivo models. For instance, Yousef et al. demonstrated that AgNPs (50 nm) induce neurotoxicity and neuroinflammation, accompanied by increased •NO levels in the brains of male Wistar rats (Yousef et al. 2019). Additionally, Trickler et al. showed that AgNP-treated rats exhibit NF-κB pathway activation, leading to increased blood–brain barrier permeability (Trickler et al. 2010).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

AgNPs trigger NF-κB nuclear translocation, followed by DAM-like phenotype induction and inflammation. Protein expression of ICAM1 (A), NF-κB (B), and IκBα (C)—72 h (n = 3); IF staining of NF-κB-AlexaFluor594 (red channel) and DAPI (blue channel)—90 min (D); intensity plots showing NF-κB-AlexaFluor594 nuclear translocation (a–h); mRNA expression of NFKB1 (I), TREM2 (II), IL1B (III), ApoE (IV), and B2M (V)−24 h (n = 3); and protein expression (n = 3) of KI67 (F), AXL (G), MyD88 (H), B2M (J), ApoE (K), ITGAX (L), PPARγ (M), and IBA1 (N) after treating HMC3 cells with 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 10 µM JSH-23, or 4 mM NAC alone, or in co-treatment (AgNPs/JSH-23; AgNPs/NAC) for the indicated time points (transwell co-culture-based experiments). A schematic summary of the results is presented at the right (E). LPS (1 µg/mL), alone or in co-treatment, was used as a positive control for IF staining and/or mRNA measurements. Imaging was performed at 630 × magnification, and the scale bar represents 50 µm. Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistically significant differences compared to the control are denoted as *, **, and *** for p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively (ANOVA, Tukey’s test). Statistically significant differences between specific groups are indicated as ## and ### for p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively (t-test). The non-processed and colored images are available at 10.5281/zenodo.14884604. (color figure online)

NF-κB activation is tightly regulated by IκBα, which inhibits NF-κB in its inactive state. Upon phosphorylation, IκBα undergoes degradation, allowing NF-κB to translocate to the nucleus via the canonical pathway (Hinz and Scheidereit 2014). Our results showed an 18.66% decrease in IκBα levels after treating HMC3 cells with AgNPs, an effect that was abolished by co-treatment with JSH-23 or NAC (Fig. 4B). Complementary results were observed in NF-κB protein expression, where AgNP treatment for 72 h led to a 20.79% increase in NF-κB protein levels compared to the control. This effect was reversed or abolished by co-treatment with JSH-23 or NAC (Fig. 4C). Additionally, we propose that AgNP-induced ROS activates the TLR4 receptor, which is supported by our findings on myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) protein expression. MyD88 is responsible for transducing signals downstream of TLR4 (Ahmed et al. 2021). We observed a significant (23.01%, compared to the control) increase in MyD88 protein levels, while co-treatment the HMC3 with JSH-23 or NAC prevented these changes (Fig. 4H). Based on these findings, we suggest that oxidative stress induced by AgNPs activates both the canonical and receptor-dependent inflammatory pathways. However, we observed a chronic rather than acute activation, as these changes became evident after prolonged exposure (72 h). Importantly, the observed decrease in AXL protein expression (by 49.15%, compared to the control) and corresponding decrease in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) protein expression by 34.49%, compared to the control support the presence of the chronic inflammation after AgNPs-treatment in HMC3 cells (Weinger et al. 2011; Nerviani et al. 2024; Pearson et al. 2024) (Fig. 4G, M). This in turn is a hallmark of several neurodegenerative diseases, including AD and dementia (Kinney et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2020).

NF-κB activation plays a crucial role in shaping the DAM phenotype, a specialized subtype of microglia linked to neurodegenerative disorders, like dementia and/or AD (Keren-Shaul et al. 2017; Deczkowska et al. 2018). Characterized by the upregulation of pro-inflammatory genes such as IL1B, along with DAM-associated markers like ApoE, TREM2, and B2M, these microglia exhibit sustained NF-κB signaling, driving chronic neuroinflammation and contributing to neurodegeneration (Krasemann et al. 2017; Butovsky and Weiner 2018). Our results showed that HMC3 cells treated for 72 h with small-size AgNPs exhibit a DAM-like increase in the expression of specific proteins, including intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM1) by 20.04%, β2 microglobulin (B2M) by 16.17%, apolipoprotein E (ApoE) by 96.09%, integrin subunit alpha X (ITGAX) by 26.59%, and calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (IBA1, also known as allograft inflammatory factor-1, AIF-1), compared to the control (Fig. 4A, J–L, N). Importantly, in almost all tested proteins, co-treatment of the cells with either JSH-23 or NAC prevented these changes and/or reversed them (Fig. 4A, J–L, N). These observations are in line with the previous studies, demonstrating that microglial activation under pathological conditions involves similar molecular markers, particularly those associated with neuroinflammatory and phagocytic responses. Notably, they also emphasize the downregulation of TREM2 in microglia (Keren-Shaul et al. 2017; Parhizkar et al. 2019). Although we did not analyze TREM2 protein expression, our experiments showed a similar decrease in its gene expression after 24 h of AgNP treatment in HMC3 cells (by 23.89% compared to the control) (Fig. 4II). In contrast, ApoE mRNA expression increased by 16.48% compared to the control following AgNP treatment, an effect that was reversed by co-treatment with AgNPs/NAC (Fig. 4IV). Meanwhile, B2M mRNA expression remained unchanged after AgNP exposure but decreased following co-treatment with AgNPs/NAC (Fig. 4V). These findings correlate with the observed protein expression patterns and align with the TREM2-dependent and subsequent TREM2-independent phases of DAM phenotype induction proposed by Friedman et al. (Friedman et al. 2018).

Given the evidence, the phagocytosis process in microglial cells plays a dual role in neurodegenerative diseases, contributing to both neuroprotection and neuroinflammation. Therefore, in the next part of our study, we decided to measure the phagocytic ability of HMC3 cells using fluorescent latex beads. Our results showed that after a short treatment period, AgNPs did not cause any significant changes in this parameter (Fig. 5A). Importantly, LPS-treated cells (positive control) also did not exhibit significant changes in phagocytic activity at this time point, suggesting that a short treatment period (i.e., 24 h) may not be sufficient to activate microglia. This contrasts with the findings of Dai et al., who reported that 6–24 h was sufficient to activate mouse microglial BV2 cells, as measured by cytokine release (Dai et al. 2015). Different origin of the cells may be a reason of the observed discrepancies. However, as proposed by Deczkowska et al., DAM-like cells are characterized by an upregulation of the phagocytosis-related genes expression, which is similar to the increased corresponding proteins expressions presented in our study after long-time of exposure (Deczkowska et al. 2018). Therefore, we extended our study by measuring the phagocytic ability of HMC3 cells after 72 h. The results supported the DAM-related mechanism proposed in the cited study, as AgNPs significantly increased the phagocytic ability of HMC3 cells by 13.50% compared to the control (Fig. 5B). Notably, NAC was unable to prevent these changes at this time point, which may be a result of too high oxidative stress in a such long-term exposition (Fig. 5B). This is further justified by studies from Kim and Choi, as well as Dalzon et al., which demonstrate alterations in phagocytosis-related genes and inflammatory responses in macrophages (Kim and Choi 2012; Dalzon et al. 2019). Finally, we demonstrated the upregulation of ITGAX and ICAM1 protein expression, whose role in phagocytosis is indisputable (also linked with DAM). This is further supported by Zhong et al., who identified—also postulated by us—an ROS-induced intracellular axis involving ROS–TLR4–ICAM1–phagocytosis (Zhong et al. 2021). Taking above into account, we propose that AgNPs activate a DAM-like phagocytic protein pattern as a result of oxidative stress, inflammation, and probably external-related TLR4 activation.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Small-size AgNPs affect the phagocytosis of human microglia cells in vitro. Phagocytosis assay results after treatment of HMC3 cells for 24 h (A) or 72 h (B) with 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 4 mM NAC, 1 µg/mL LPS, and in co-treatment (n = 3, mono-culture-based experiments). Representative graphs are shown next to the tables. The visualization of latex beads phagocytosis (green channel) by HMC3 cells exposed to the respective compounds is presented at the center of the figure. These cells were also immunostained with anti-ACTB-AlexaFluor594 antibodies (red channel) and DAPI (blue channel), with merged images provided. Imaging was performed at 630 × magnification. Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistically significant differences compared to the control are denoted as * and *** for p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively (one-way ANOVA). Differences between AgNP-treated cells and AgNP co-treated cells are indicated as # and ### for p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively (t-test). Images taken in the green channel (denoted as +) were processed using the Background Subtraction (radius: 300) ImageJ plug-in to enhance readability; however, non-processed and edited images are available at 10.5281/zenodo.14884638. (color figure online)

AgNPs-induced DAM-like phenotype affects the function of the neurons in co-cultured model in vitro

In this part of the study, we repeated the experiment with co-treatment using JSH-23 and NAC in a mono-culture of chosen neuron model, i.e., differentiated SH-SY5Y cells. The observed decrease in metabolic activity after 24 h of treatment was similar to that in the dose-dependent experiments (Fig. 6A). While NAC co-treatment did not prevent AgNP-induced cytotoxicity, JSH-23 induced reversed effect. This aligns with the intracellular ROS levels, where both JSH-23 and NAC reversed the effects of AgNPs, though JSH-23 had a stronger impact. Based on this, we believe that the mechanism of AgNP action in neurons resembles that in microglia, involving increased ROS, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Similar cytotoxic effects of AgNPs were previously reported by Park et al. in undifferentiated SH-SY5Y cells and by Weldon et al. in mouse organotypic brain cultures (Park et al. 2017; Weldon et al. 2018). Next, we have performed the IF staining of Tau protein to confirm the above-described dependency as this protein is characteristic for neuron cytoskeleton and may be used as an indicator of overall cell condition (Brandt et al. 2020). The obtained results show decrease number of neurons after treatment with AgNPs (visualized as lower level of red fluorescence), while this effect was reversed in AgNPs/JSH-23 and AgNPs/NAC co-treated cells (Fig. 7F).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Synapses dysfunction in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells (neuron model) after exposure of AgNPs in co-culture conditions. The protein expression (n = 3; transwell co-culture-based experiments) of SYN1 (A), SYP (B), SNAP-25 (C), and AChE (D)—72 h, IF staining of Tau-AlexaFluor594 (red channel) and DAPI (blue channel)—24 h (F) after treating differentiated SH-SY5Y cells with CM, containing 1 µg/mL AgNPs, 10 µM JSH-23, or 4 mM NAC alone, or in co-treatment (AgNPs/JSH-23; AgNPs/NAC) for the indicated time points. The scheme, summarizing the obtained results is presented at the center (E). The LPS (1 µg/mL), alone or in co-treatment, was used as a positive control for IF staining. Imaging was performed at 100 × magnification, and the scale bar represents 200 µm. Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistically significant differences compared to the control are denoted as *, and *** for p < 0.05, and p < 0.001, respectively (ANOVA, Tukey’s test). Statistically significant differences between specific groups are indicated as ### for p < 0.001 (t-test). The non-processed and colored images are available at 10.5281/zenodo.14884657. (color figure online)

Our further investigations focused on AgNP-induced DAM HMC3 cells’ effects on neurons using the transwell co-culture model. Our results confirm the oxidative stress-dependent action of AgNPs in neurons, as evidenced by increased CAT and SOD2 protein expression by 36.60% and 15.87%, respectively, after 72 h of AgNP treatment (Fig. 6E, L). Notably, in AgNP/JSH-23- and AgNP/NAC-co-treated cells, this effect was reversed, supporting our hypothesis and aligning with findings in microglia cells (Fig. 6E, L). Additionally, Dąbrowska-Bouta et al. and Dziendzikowska et al. reported similar pro-oxidative tendencies in rats exposed to 10 nm citrate-coated AgNPs (Dąbrowska-Bouta et al. 2019; Dziendzikowska et al. 2022).

Considering previous studies, AgNP-induced oxidative stress and inflammation contribute to DAM in HMC3 cells, characterized by increased IL1B mRNA expression, a key pro-inflammatory cytokine (Ren and Torres 2009). We propose that neuronal inflammation is triggered both intracellularly by AgNP-induced ROS via the IκBα/NF-κB pathway and may be also induced extracellularly by cytokines and/or DAMPs secreted by HMC3 cells. This is supported by NF-κB co-localization results, which showed nuclear accumulation of NF-κB fluorescence in AgNP-treated neurons after 24 h (Fig. 6G, b). While JSH-23 (an NF-κB inhibitor) mitigated this effect, AgNPs/LPS-co-treatment resulted in a summative effect, further promoting protein translocation. NAC was unable to fully block AgNP-induced translocation but did mitigate the effect (Fig. 6G, d, f, h). Although a 24.94% decrease in NFKB1 mRNA expression was observed within this timeframe, we believe this discrepancy may be due to a positive feedback loop (Fig. 6C). In JSH-23-, AgNPs/JSH-23-, NAC-, and AgNPs/NAC-treated cells, NFKB1 gene expression decreased by 23.61%, 37.01%, and 29.41%, respectively, likely due to the mitigating properties of these compounds (Fig. 6C). Kumar et al. similarly demonstrated that JSH-23 prevents NF-κB-dependent oxidative stress and inflammation (including NF-κB translocation) in Sprague Dawley rat sciatic nerves (Kumar et al. 2011). Likewise, Kim et al. and Shah et al. showed that AgNP-induced ROS effects were prevented in HepG2 and 16HBE cells, respectively (Kim et al. 2009; Shah et al. 2020). The observed 39.79% decrease in IκBα protein expression in AgNP-treated neurons, and its reversal after JSH-23 co-treatment, further supports inflammation induction (Fig. 6I).

Additionally, increased TLR4 expression suggests an extracellular inflammation mechanism, similar to that observed in HMC3 cells. This is justified by the 44.76% increase in TLR4 expression in AgNP-treated neurons (Fig. 6J). These cells also exhibited an 18.11% increase in TRAF6 protein expression, a key intracellular signal transducer of TLR4 activation (Fig. 6H) (Walsh et al. 2015). Notably, TRAF6 also mediates pro-inflammatory signaling via IL-1βR1, IL-17R, and TNFRs (Wang et al. 2020). Although we did not measure cytokine and/or DAMP secretion, the increased IL1B mRNA expression in HMC3 cells suggests that AgNP-induced DAM in microglia triggers neuronal inflammation. TLR4 activation may also result from neuron-derived DAMPs in response to oxidative stress, a hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases (Zhou et al. 2020). Additionally, AgNP-treated neurons showed a 72.24% increase in ROCK1 protein expression (Fig. 6D). Although in primary microglia, however, Glotfelty et al. evidenced the presence of TLR4-ROCK1 intracellular axis, which is activated as a response to the TLR4-induced inflammation and indicated its role in the cytoskeleton stabilization (Glotfelty et al. 2023). Importantly, in most cases, JSH-23 and NAC co-treatment abolished or significantly reduced AgNP-induced effects. Based on our findings and previous studies, we demonstrate that AgNPs activate a DAM-like phenotype in human microglia, leading to neuronal inflammation via both extracellular and intracellular stimuli. However, we are aware that the chosen microglial model (HMC3 cells) has specific limitations, and the obtained results should be validated using more physiologically relevant models, such as human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia, as well as in vivo experiments (Dello Russo et al. 2018) (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Proposed mechanism of DAM-like phenotype and neurodegeneration induction in co-cultured microglia/neurons in vitro. The dotted lines represent probably interactions

The final part of our study aimed to determine the effect of AgNP-induced disruptions on specific neuronal proteins involved in synapse-related transport and intercellular brain communication, including Synoviolin I (SYN1), Synaptophysin (SYP), synaptosome-associated protein-25 (SNAP-25), and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (Yagishita et al. 2008; Luo et al. 2018; Marucci et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2022). Our results indicate that AgNP-induced ROS and/or inflammation may impair intercellular communication. Specifically, we observed a 37.09% decrease in SYN1 protein expression in AgNP-treated neurons compared to the control (Fig. 7A). Additionally, SNAP-25 protein levels were reduced by 48.94% in the same conditions (Fig. 7C). Notably, co-treatment with either JSH-23 or NAC effectively prevented these AgNP-induced reductions in both proteins (Fig. 7A, C). Previous studies have shown that downregulation of SYN1 and SNAP-25 gene expression may be associated with the early stages of AD and PD (Wang et al. 2023). Furthermore, recent findings by Cai et al. demonstrated reduced intercellular communication—measured by extracellular vesicle levels—in AD patients, alongside decreased Syn1 and Snap-25 mRNA expression in an AD mouse model (Cai et al. 2024). Although we have not detected any significant changes of the AChE as well as SYP proteins expression after treatment of AgNPs, the literature data in this question are inconsistent. Skalska et al. demonstrated that oral exposure to AgNPs in rats leads to a reduction in Syp levels, indicating synaptic damage, whereas Chang et al. reported that AgNPs induce synaptic transport loss by triggering the overexpression of Syp in male ICR mice (Skalska et al. 2015; Chang et al. 2022). This discrepancy suggests that the effects of AgNPs on synaptic proteins may be cell-specific and require further investigation. Nevertheless, the findings discussed above suggest that AgNPs induce synaptic disruption, which may have pathological relevance in neurodegenerative diseases.

Conclusions

In this study, we report that small-size AgNPs can induce a DAM-like phenotype in a simplified model of human microglial cells through activation of the NF-κB pathway, driven by oxidative stress, as well as extracellular activation of specific receptors, such as TLRs. An increased level of •NO was also detected. The observed phenotype may be probably related to the secretion of cytokines, which interact with specific cytokine-related receptors in neuronal cells, ultimately triggering extracellularly-induced inflammation. Furthermore, the uptake of AgNPs by these cells induces excessive ROS generation and the activation of antioxidant proteins, such as CAT and SOD. In cases of insufficiency, this response may further amplify inflammation. This process impairs synapse-dependent signaling pathways in tested neurons cells, as indicated by the altered expression of SNAP-25 and SYN1 proteins. Although this study was conducted using in vitro models, we believe our findings provide a strong foundation for further in vivo research on the safety of small-size AgNPs in humans.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

The Graphical Abstract and specific schemes were prepared, using www.biorender.com

Author contributions

BS: conceptualization; methodology; investigation; formal analysis; visualization; supervision; project administration; funding acquisition; writing—original draft; writing—review & editing; KSz: investigation (real-time qPCR); writing—review & editing.

Funding

The study was funded by National Science Centre, Poland, MINIATURA 8, under Grant No. 2024/08/X/NZ3/00463.

Data availability

Data are available on reasonable request and/or are stored in open repository (Zenodo).

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Ahmed H, Khan MA, Kahlert UD et al (2021) Role of adaptor protein myeloid differentiation 88 (MyD88) in post-subarachnoid hemorrhage inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci 22:4185. 10.3390/ijms22084185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. An M, Eo H, Son H et al (2020) Anti-inflammatory effects of leaf and branch extracts of honeyberry (Lonicera caerulea) on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 cells through ATF3 and Nrf2/HO-1 activation. Mol Med Rep 22:5219–5230. 10.3892/mmr.2020.11638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Babaei M, Tayemeh MB, Jo MS et al (2022) Trophic transfer and toxicity of silver nanoparticles along a phytoplankton-zooplankton-fish food chain. Sci Total Environ 842:156807. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Badimon A, Strasburger HJ, Ayata P et al (2020) Negative feedback control of neuronal activity by microglia. Nature 586:417–423. 10.1038/s41586-020-2777-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brandt R, Trushina NI, Bakota L (2020) Much more than a cytoskeletal protein: physiological and pathological functions of the non-microtubule binding region of tau. Front Neurol. 10.3389/fneur.2020.590059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Butovsky O, Weiner HL (2018) Microglial signatures and their role in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 19:622–635. 10.1038/s41583-018-0057-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cai H, Pang Y, Ren Z et al (2024) Delivering synaptic protein mRNAs via extracellular vesicles ameliorates cognitive impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Med 22:138. 10.1186/s12916-024-03359-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carrola J, Bastos V, Jarak I et al (2016) Metabolomics of silver nanoparticles toxicity in HaCaT cells: structure–activity relationships and role of ionic silver and oxidative stress. Nanotoxicology 10:1105–1117. 10.1080/17435390.2016.1177744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang X, Niu S, Shang M et al (2022) Silver nanoparticles induced hippocampal neuronal damage involved in mitophagy, mitochondrial biogenesis and synaptic degeneration. Food Chem Toxicol 166:113227. 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen T, Guo J, Han C et al (2009) Heat shock protein 70, released from heat-stressed tumor cells, initiates antitumor immunity by inducing tumor cell chemokine production and activating dendritic cells via TLR4 pathway. J Immunol 182:1449–1459. 10.4049/jimmunol.182.3.1449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dąbrowska-Bouta B, Sulkowski G, Strużyński W, Strużyńska L (2019) Prolonged exposure to silver nanoparticles results in oxidative stress in cerebral myelin. Neurotox Res 35:495–504. 10.1007/s12640-018-9977-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dai X, Li N, Yu L et al (2015) Activation of BV2 microglia by lipopolysaccharide triggers an inflammatory reaction in PC12 cell apoptosis through a toll-like receptor 4-dependent pathway. Cell Stress Chaperones 20:321–331. 10.1007/s12192-014-0552-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dalzon B, Torres A, Diemer H et al (2019) How reversible are the effects of silver nanoparticles on macrophages? A proteomic-instructed view. Environ Sci Nano 6:3133–3157. 10.1039/C9EN00408D [Google Scholar]
  14. Dan M, Xu L, Shao A et al (2015) Silver nanoparticles induce tight junction disruption and astrocyte neurotoxicity in a rat blood-brain barrier primary triple coculture model. Int J Nanomedicine. 10.2147/IJN.S85265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dayem AA, Kim B, Gurunathan S et al (2014) Biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles induce neuronal differentiation of SH-SY5Y cells via modulation of reactive oxygen species, phosphatases, and kinase signaling pathways. Biotechnol J 9:934–943. 10.1002/biot.201300555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Medeiros LM, De Bastiani MA, Rico EP et al (2019) Cholinergic differentiation of human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line and its potential use as an in vitro model for Alzheimer’s disease studies. Mol Neurobiol 56:7355–7367. 10.1007/s12035-019-1605-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Deczkowska A, Keren-Shaul H, Weiner A et al (2018) Disease-associated microglia: a universal immune sensor of neurodegeneration. Cell 173:1073–1081. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dello Russo C, Cappoli N, Coletta I et al (2018) The human microglial HMC3 cell line: where do we stand? A systematic literature review. J Neuroinflammation 15:259. 10.1186/s12974-018-1288-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Deng S, Yu K, Zhang B et al (2015) Toll-like receptor 4 promotes NO synthesis by upregulating GCHI expression under oxidative stress conditions in sheep monocytes/macrophages. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2015:1–11. 10.1155/2015/359315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Diep S, Maddukuri M, Yamauchi S et al (2022) Interleukin-1 and nuclear factor kappa B signaling promote breast cancer progression and treatment resistance. Cells 11:1673. 10.3390/cells11101673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Docea AO, Calina D, Buga AM et al (2020) The effect of silver nanoparticles on antioxidant/pro-oxidant balance in a murine model. Int J Mol Sci 21:1233. 10.3390/ijms21041233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dodd S, Dean O, Copolov DL et al (2008) N -acetylcysteine for antioxidant therapy: pharmacology and clinical utility. Expert Opin Biol Ther 8:1955–1962. 10.1517/14728220802517901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dziendzikowska K, Wilczak J, Grodzicki W et al (2022) Coating-dependent neurotoxicity of silver nanoparticles—an in vivo study on hippocampal oxidative stress and neurosteroids. Int J Mol Sci 23:1365. 10.3390/ijms23031365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fang H, Wu Y, Huang X et al (2011) Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is essential for Hsp70-like protein 1 (HSP70L1) to activate dendritic cells and induce Th1 response. J Biol Chem 286:30393–30400. 10.1074/jbc.M111.266528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fang W, Chi Z, Li W et al (2019) Comparative study on the toxic mechanisms of medical nanosilver and silver ions on the antioxidant system of erythrocytes: from the aspects of antioxidant enzyme activities and molecular interaction mechanisms. J Nanobiotechnology 17:66. 10.1186/s12951-019-0502-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fernandes M, González-Ballesteros N, da Costa A et al (2023) Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity of silver nanoparticles biosynthesized with Cystoseira algae extracts. J Biol Inorg Chem 28:439–450. 10.1007/s00775-023-01999-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Flores-López LZ, Espinoza-Gómez H, Somanathan R (2019) Silver nanoparticles: Electron transfer, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress, beneficial and toxicological effects. Mini Review J Appl Toxicol 39:16–26. 10.1002/jat.3654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Franková J, Pivodová V, Vágnerová H et al (2016) Effects of silver nanoparticles on primary cell cultures of fibroblasts and keratinocytes in a wound-healing model. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 10.5301/jabfm.5000268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Friedman BA, Srinivasan K, Ayalon G et al (2018) Diverse brain myeloid expression profiles reveal distinct microglial activation states and aspects of Alzheimer’s disease not evident in mouse models. Cell Rep 22:832–847. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gao C, Jiang J, Tan Y, Chen S (2023) Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther 8:359. 10.1038/s41392-023-01588-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Glotfelty EJ, Tovar-y-Romo LB, Hsueh S-C et al (2023) The RhoA-ROCK1/ROCK2 pathway exacerbates inflammatory signaling in immortalized and primary microglia. Cells 12:1367. 10.3390/cells12101367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gokulan K, Williams K, Orr S, Khare S (2020) Human intestinal tissue explant exposure to silver nanoparticles reveals sex dependent alterations in inflammatory responses and epithelial cell permeability. Int J Mol Sci 22:9. 10.3390/ijms22010009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gonzalez-Carter DA, Leo BF, Ruenraroengsak P et al (2017) Silver nanoparticles reduce brain inflammation and related neurotoxicity through induction of H2S-synthesizing enzymes. Sci Rep 7:42871. 10.1038/srep42871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guo X, Zhang G, Chen L et al (2017) Newborn neurons are damaged in vitro by a low concentration of silver nanoparticles through the inflammatory oxidative stress pathway. DNA Cell Biol 36:1062–1070. 10.1089/dna.2017.3795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hinz M, Scheidereit C (2014) The IκB kinase complex in NF-κB regulation and beyond. EMBO Rep 15:46–61. 10.1002/embr.201337983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hsiao I, Hsieh Y, Chuang C et al (2017) Effects of silver nanoparticles on the interactions of neuron- and glia-like cells: toxicity, uptake mechanisms, and lysosomal tracking. Environ Toxicol 32:1742–1753. 10.1002/tox.22397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Huang L, Xu G, Guo J et al (2016) Mesenchymal stem cells modulate light-induced activation of retinal microglia through CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 24:684–692. 10.3109/09273948.2015.1071405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ihtisham M, Noori A, Yadav S et al (2021) Silver nanoparticle’s toxicological effects and phytoremediation. Nanomaterials 11:2164. 10.3390/nano11092164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Janzadeh A, Behroozi Z, Saliminia F et al (2022) Neurotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in the animal brain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Forensic Toxicol 40:49–63. 10.1007/s11419-021-00589-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A et al (2017) A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 169:1276-1290.e17. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim S, Choi I-H (2012) Phagocytosis and endocytosis of silver nanoparticles induce interleukin-8 production in human macrophages. Yonsei Med J 53:654. 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.3.654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim S, Choi JE, Choi JE et al (2009) Oxidative stress-dependent toxicity of silver nanoparticles in human hepatoma cells. Toxicol in Vitro 23:1076–1084. 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim TT-H, Kim M, Park HH-S et al (2012) Size-dependent cellular toxicity of silver nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res A 100A:1033–1043. 10.1002/jbm.a.34053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim S-H, Ko J-W, Koh S-K et al (2014) Silver nanoparticles induce apoptotic cell death in cultured cerebral cortical neurons. Mol Cell Toxicol 10:173–179. 10.1007/s13273-014-0019-6 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kinney JW, Bemiller SM, Murtishaw AS et al (2018) Inflammation as a central mechanism in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement Transl Res Clin Interv 4:575–590. 10.1016/j.trci.2018.06.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kong X, Thimmulappa R, Kombairaju P, Biswal S (2010) NADPH oxidase-dependent reactive oxygen species mediate amplified TLR4 signaling and sepsis-induced mortality in Nrf2-deficient mice. J Immunol 185:569–577. 10.4049/jimmunol.0902315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Krasemann S, Madore C, Cialic R et al (2017) The TREM2-APOE pathway drives the transcriptional phenotype of dysfunctional microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Immunity 47:566-581.e9. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.08.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kumar A, Negi G, Sharma SS (2011) JSH-23 targets nuclear factor-kappa B and reverses various deficits in experimental diabetic neuropathy: effect on neuroinflammation and antioxidant defence. Diabetes Obes Metab 13:750–758. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01402.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Li L, Cui J, Liu Z et al (2018) Silver nanoparticles induce SH-SY5Y cell apoptosis via endoplasmic reticulum- and mitochondrial pathways that lengthen endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contact sites and alter inositol-3-phosphate receptor function. Toxicol Lett 285:156–167. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Li L, Bi Z, Hu Y et al (2021) Silver nanoparticles and silver ions cause inflammatory response through induction of cell necrosis and the release of mitochondria in vivo and in vitro. Cell Biol Toxicol 37:177–191. 10.1007/s10565-020-09526-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu F, Mahmood M, Xu Y et al (2015) Effects of silver nanoparticles on human and rat embryonic neural stem cells. Front Neurosci. 10.3389/fnins.2015.00115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu W, Worms I, Slaveykova VI (2020) Interaction of silver nanoparticles with antioxidant enzymes. Environ Sci Nano. 10.1039/C9EN01284B [Google Scholar]
  53. Liu Q, Liu H, Zhang S et al (2022) Cerebrospinal fluid synaptosomal-associated protein 25 levels in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis 89:121–132. 10.3233/JAD-215696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Luo J, Norris RHH, Gordon SLL, Nithianantharajah J (2018) Neurodevelopmental synaptopathies: insights from behaviour in rodent models of synapse gene mutations. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 84:424–439. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ma L, Sun P, Zhang J-C et al (2017) Proinflammatory effects of S100A8/A9 via TLR4 and RAGE signaling pathways in BV-2 microglial cells. Int J Mol Med 40:31–38. 10.3892/ijmm.2017.2987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Marucci G, Buccioni M, Ben DD et al (2021) Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropharmacology 190:108352. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mat Lazim Z, Salmiati S, Marpongahtun M et al (2023) Distribution of silver (Ag) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in aquatic environment. Water 15:1349. 10.3390/w15071349 [Google Scholar]
  58. Mikhailova EO (2020) Silver nanoparticles: mechanism of action and probable bio-application. J Funct Biomater 11:84. 10.3390/jfb11040084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Muzio L, Viotti A, Martino G (2021) Microglia in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration: from understanding to therapy. Front Neurosci. 10.3389/fnins.2021.742065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nallanthighal S, Chan C, Murray TM et al (2017) Differential effects of silver nanoparticles on DNA damage and DNA repair gene expression in Ogg1-deficient and wild type mice. Nanotoxicology 11:996–1011. 10.1080/17435390.2017.1388863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Nerviani A, Boutet M-A, Ghirardi GM et al (2024) Axl and MerTK regulate synovial inflammation and are modulated by IL-6 inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Commun 15:2398. 10.1038/s41467-024-46564-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Oseni SO, Naar C, Pavlović M et al (2023) The molecular basis and clinical consequences of chronic inflammation in prostatic diseases: prostatitis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostate cancer. Cancers (Basel) 15:3110. 10.3390/cancers15123110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Parhizkar S, Arzberger T, Brendel M et al (2019) Loss of TREM2 function increases amyloid seeding but reduces plaque-associated ApoE. Nat Neurosci 22:191–204. 10.1038/s41593-018-0296-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Park JH, Gurunathan S, Choi Y-J et al (2017) Silver nanoparticles suppresses brain-derived neurotrophic factor-induced cell survival in the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y. J Ind Eng Chem 47:62–73. 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.11.015 [Google Scholar]
  65. Pearson A, Koprivica M, Eisenbaum M et al (2024) Pparγ activation ameliorates cognitive impairment and chronic microglial activation in the aftermath of r-mTBI. J Neuroinflammation 21:194. 10.1186/s12974-024-03173-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Perde-Schrepler M, Florea A, Brie I et al (2019) Size-dependent cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in cochlear cells in vitro. J Nanomater 2019:1–12. 10.1155/2019/6090259 [Google Scholar]
  67. Rangaraju S, Dammer EB, Raza SA et al (2018) Identification and therapeutic modulation of a pro-inflammatory subset of disease-associated-microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 13:24. 10.1186/s13024-018-0254-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ren K, Torres R (2009) Role of interleukin-1β during pain and inflammation. Brain Res Rev 60:57–64. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Shah KN, Shah PN, Mullen AR et al (2020) N-acetyl cysteine abrogates silver-induced reactive oxygen species in human cells without altering silver-based antimicrobial activity. Toxicol Lett 332:118–129. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.07.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Shang M, Niu S, Chang X et al (2022) Silver nanoparticle-induced impaired autophagic flux and lysosomal dysfunction contribute to the microglia inflammation polarization. Food Chem Toxicol 170:113469. 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sharma A, Sanjay JV et al (2023) Biogenic silver NPs alleviate LPS-induced neuroinflammation in a human fetal brain-derived cell line: molecular switch to the M2 phenotype, modulation of TLR4/MyD88 and Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathways, and molecular docking analysis. Biomater Adv 148:213363. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Skalska J, Frontczak-Baniewicz M, Strużyńska L (2015) Synaptic degeneration in rat brain after prolonged oral exposure to silver nanoparticles. Neurotoxicology 46:145–154. 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Skóra B, Szychowski KA (2025) Proteostasis and autophagy disruption by the aging-related VGVAPG hexapeptide - preliminary insights into a potential novel elastin-induced neurodegeneration pathway in an in vitro human cellular neuron model. Neurochem Int 187:105992. 10.1016/j.neuint.2025.105992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Skóra B, Piechowiak T, Szychowski KA (2022) Epidermal growth factor-labeled liposomes as a way to target the toxicity of silver nanoparticles into EGFR-overexpressing cancer cells in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 443:116009. 10.1016/j.taap.2022.116009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Skóra B, Masicz M, Nowak P et al (2023a) Suppression of sonic hedgehog pathway-based proliferation in glioblastoma cells by small-size silver nanoparticles in vitro. Arch Toxicol. 10.1007/s00204-023-03552-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Skóra B, Matuszewska P, Masicz M et al (2023b) Crosstalk between the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) as a key factor in the metabolism of silver nanoparticles in neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 458:116339. 10.1016/j.taap.2022.116339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Skóra B, Piechowiak T, Szychowski KA (2024a) Engagement of specific intracellular pathways in the inflammation-based reprotoxicity effect of small-size silver nanoparticles on spermatogonia and spermatocytes in vitro cell models. Chemosphere 363:142897. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Skóra B, Piechowiak T, Szychowski KA (2024b) Interaction between aging-related elastin-derived peptide (VGVAPG) and sirtuin 2 and its impact on functions of human neuron cells in an in vitro model. Mol Neurobiol. 10.1007/s12035-024-04298-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Soltani MH, Pichardo R, Song Z et al (2005) Microtubule-associated protein 2, a marker of neuronal differentiation, induces mitotic defects, inhibits growth of melanoma cells, and predicts metastatic potential of cutaneous melanoma. Am J Pathol 166:1841–1850. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62493-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Sun J, Druhan LJ, Zweier JL (2010) Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species regulate inducible nitric oxide synthase function shifting the balance of nitric oxide and superoxide production. Arch Biochem Biophys 494:130–137. 10.1016/j.abb.2009.11.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Szychowski KA, Gmiński J (2019) The vgvapg peptide regulates the production of nitric oxide synthases and reactive oxygen species in mouse astrocyte cells in vitro. Neurochem Res 44:1127–1137. 10.1007/s11064-019-02746-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Szychowski KA, Skóra B (2024) Elastin-derived peptides (EDPs) affect gene and protein expression in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) – preliminary study. Cytokine 182:156725. 10.1016/j.cyto.2024.156725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Szychowski KA, Wnuk A, Rzemieniec J et al (2019) Triclosan-evoked neurotoxicity involves NMDAR subunits with the specific role of GluN2A in caspase-3-dependent apoptosis. Mol Neurobiol 56:1–12. 10.1007/s12035-018-1083-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Tak PP, Firestein GS (2001) NF-κB: a key role in inflammatory diseases. J Clin Invest 107:7–11. 10.1172/JCI11830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Tang J, Xiong L, Wang S et al (2008) Influence of silver nanoparticles on neurons and blood-brain barrier via subcutaneous injection in rats. Appl Surf Sci 255:502–504. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.058 [Google Scholar]
  86. Trickler WJ, Lantz SM, Murdock RC et al (2010) Silver nanoparticle induced blood-brain barrier inflammation and increased permeability in primary rat brain microvessel endothelial cells. Toxicol Sci 118:160–170. 10.1093/toxsci/kfq244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Vahabirad M, Daei S, Abbasalipourkabir R, Ziamajidi N (2024) Anticancer action of silver nanoparticles in SKBR3 breast cancer cells through promotion of oxidative stress and apoptosis. Biomed Res Int 2024:1–12. 10.1155/2024/7145339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Vieira-da-Silva B, Castanho MARB (2023) Resazurin reduction-based assays revisited: guidelines for accurate reporting of relative differences on metabolic status. Molecules 28:2283. 10.3390/molecules28052283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Walsh MC, Lee J, Choi Y (2015) Tumor necrosis factor receptor- associated factor 6 (TRAF6) regulation of development, function, and homeostasis of the immune system. Immunol Rev 266:72–92. 10.1111/imr.12302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang J, Wu X, Jiang M, Tai G (2020) Mechanism by which TRAF6 participates in the immune regulation of autoimmune diseases and cancer. Biomed Res Int. 10.1155/2020/4607197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wang Q, Tao S, Xing L et al (2023) SNAP25 is a potential target for early stage Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Med Res 28:570. 10.1186/s40001-023-01360-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Weidmann E, Brieger J, Jahn B et al (1995) Lactate dehydrogenase-release assay: a reliable, nonradioactive technique for analysis of cytotoxic lymphocyte-mediated lytic activity against blasts from acute myelocytic leukemia. Ann Hematol 70:153–158. 10.1007/BF01682036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Weinger JG, Brosnan CF, Loudig O et al (2011) Loss of the receptor tyrosine kinase Axl leads to enhanced inflammation in the CNS and delayed removal of myelin debris during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroinflammation 8:49. 10.1186/1742-2094-8-49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Weldon BA, Park JJ, Hong S et al (2018) Using primary organotypic mouse midbrain cultures to examine developmental neurotoxicity of silver nanoparticles across two genetic strains. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 354:215–224. 10.1016/j.taap.2018.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Yagishita N, Yamasaki S, Nishioka K, Nakajima T (2008) Synoviolin, protein folding and the maintenance of joint homeostasis. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 4:91–97. 10.1038/ncprheum0699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Yamaguchi S, Isaka R, Sakahashi Y et al (2022) Silver nanoparticles suppress retinoic acid-induced neuronal differentiation in human-derived neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. ACS Appl Nano Mater 5:19025–19034. 10.1021/acsanm.2c04938 [Google Scholar]
  97. Yang E-J, Kim S, Kim JS, Choi I-H (2012) Inflammasome formation and IL-1β release by human blood monocytes in response to silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials 33:6858–6867. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Yilgor A, Demir C (2024) Determination of oxidative stress level and some antioxidant activities in refractory epilepsy patients. Sci Rep 14:6688. 10.1038/s41598-024-57224-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Yousef MI, Abuzreda AA, Kamel MAE-N (2019) Neurotoxicity and inflammation induced by individual and combined exposure to iron oxide nanoparticles and silver nanoparticles. J Taibah Univ Sci 13:570–578. 10.1080/16583655.2019.1602351 [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhao W, Fan J, Kulic I et al (2020) Axl receptor tyrosine kinase is a regulator of apolipoprotein E. Mol Brain 13:66. 10.1186/s13041-020-00609-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhong H, Lin H, Pang Q et al (2021) Macrophage ICAM-1 functions as a regulator of phagocytosis in LPS induced endotoxemia. Inflamm Res 70:193–203. 10.1007/s00011-021-01437-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhou Y, Chen Y, Xu C et al (2020) TLR4 targeting as a promising therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer disease treatment. Front Neurosci. 10.3389/fnins.2020.602508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on reasonable request and/or are stored in open repository (Zenodo).


Articles from Archives of Toxicology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES