Bipeta R. Research that is not published is not worth doing. Indian J Psychol Med 2025;47(5):421–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176251377594
The author would like to correct mistakes found in the reference list of the article mentioned above. These errors resulted from inaccuracies during the manuscript preparation. The corrections made do not affect the findings, interpretation, or conclusions of the article. The author sincerely regrets the oversight. The online version of the editorial has been corrected.
Incorrect References
3. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337: 867–872. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y.
12. Garfield E. Citation indexing for studying science. Nature 1979; 227(5259): 669–671. DOI: 10.1038/227669a0.
13. Resnik DB. Ethics of science communication. Sci Eng Ethics 2011; 17(3): 399–409. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9210-x.
20. Knottnerus JA and André J. The potential impact of unpublished results. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66(10): 1061–1063. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.001.
21. Khan S. Clinical study cost breakdown: What makes a study expensive? Clinical Trial Risk Tool [Internet]. 6 May 2025. Available from: https://clinicaltrialrisk.org/rct-cost-modelling/clinical-study-costbreakdown-what-makes-a-study-expensive/ (accessed 27 August 2025).
23. ProRelix Research. Phase-by-phase clinical trial costs: What every sponsor needs to know! [Internet]. 5 May 2025. Available from: https://prorelixresearch.com/phase-byphase-clinical-trial-costs-what-everysponsor-needs-to-know/ (accessed 27 August 2025).
24. Smith R. Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science. J R Soc Med 2006; 99(4): 178–182. DOI: 10.1177/014107680609900414.
27. Suber P. Open Access [Internet]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012. Available from: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262300988/open-access/ (accessed 27 August 2025).
29. Yaqub O. Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res. Pol 2018; 47: 169–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.007.
32. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA 2013; 310 (20): 2191–2194.
36. National Institutes of Health. Data Management & Sharing Policy Overview. NIH Grants & Funding. [updated 5 August 2025]. Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/sharing-policies/dms/policy-overview (accessed 27 August 2025).
41. Rajshekhar B. Research should not be need-based! Arch Ment Health 2010; 11(1): 2–3. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/amhe/citation/2010/11010/research_should_not_be_need_based_.2.aspx (accessed 27 August 2025).
Corrected References
3. Easterbrook PJ, Gopalan R, Berlin JA, et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991;337(8746): 867–872.
12. Garfield E. Citation indexing for studying science. Nature 1970; 227:669–671. https://doi.org/10.1038/227669a0 (accessed 27 August 2025).
13. Resnik DB. Scientific research and the public trust. Sci Eng Ethics 2011;17(3): 399–409. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9210-x (accessed 27 August 2025).
20. Knottnerus JA, Tugwell P. The potential impact of unpublished results. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66(10):1061–1063. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.001 (accessed 27 August 2025).
21. Khan S. Clinical study cost breakdown–what makes a study expensive? Clinical Trial Risk Tool [Internet]. https://clinicaltrialrisk.org/rct-cost-modelling/clinical-study-cost-breakdown-what-makes-a-study-expensive/ (accessed 27 August 2025).
23. Andhalkar N. ProRelix Research. Phase-by-phase clinical trial costs: What every sponsor needs to know! [Internet]. 5 May 2025. https://prorelixresearch.com/phase-byphase-clinical-trial-costs-what-everysponsor-needs-to-know/ (accessed 27 August 2025).
24. Smith R. Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med 2006; 99(4):178–182. DOI: 10.1177/014107680609900414 (accessed 27 August 2025).
27. Suber P. The MIT Press Essential Knowledge series. Open Access [Internet]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262300988/open-access/ (accessed 27 August 2025).
29. Yaqub O. Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res. Pol 2018; 47 (1): 169–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.007 (accessed 27 August 2025).
32. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310(20):2191–2194. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
36. NIH Grants & Funding. Data Management & Sharing Policy Overview. [updated 5 August 2025]. https://grants.nih.gov/policy-and-compliance/policy-topics/sharing-policies/dms/policy-overview (accessed 27 August 2025).
41. Rajshekhar B. Research should not be need-based! Arch Ment Health 2010; 11(1): 2–3. https://journals.lww.com/amhe/citation/2010/11010/research_should_not_be_need_based_.2.aspx (accessed 27 August 2025).