Skip to main content
JAAD International logoLink to JAAD International
. 2025 Dec 16;25:44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2025.11.026

Prevalence, multiterritorial vascular distribution, and burden of subclinical atherosclerosis in psoriasis: The EDSAP study

Carlota Abbad-Jaime de Aragon a, Emilio Berna-Rico a, Alba Lecumberri a, Javier Perez-Bootello a, María Davó-Mogica a,b, Fernando Neria-Serrano b, Diana Monge b, María Asunción Ballester-Martínez a, Cristina Pindado-Ortega a, María Castellanos-González c, Mar Llamas-Velasco d, Samantha Wasniewski e,f,g,h, María G Barderas i,j, Pedro Jaén a, Joel M Gelfand k,l, Nehal N Mehta m, Jorge Solís e,n, Leticia Fernández-Friera e,f,g,h,, Álvaro González-Cantero a,b,∗∗
PMCID: PMC12860958  PMID: 41630863

Abstract

Background

Psoriasis increases atherosclerosis risk due to inflammation. To date, subclinical atherosclerosis (SA) in psoriasis has only been studied in individual vascular territories by imaging.

Objective

To conduct a comprehensive evaluation of multiterritorial SA prevalence in psoriasis by imaging and establish its relationships with cardiovascular (CV) risk scores.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis without CV disease from the Early Detection of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Psoriasis (EDSAP) cohort underwent vascular ultrasound of carotid/femoral arteries and noncontrast/contrast-coronary computed tomography angiography. SA was defined by the presence of any plaque or a coronary artery calcium score ≥1.

Results

The median age was 48.04 (8.25) years, 73% were male, and 77% of participants had SA. Femoral arteries were most affected (57.1%), followed by the coronaries (51.3%) and carotid arteries (49.6%). Femoral plaques exhibited the strongest associations with coronary parameters. CV risk scores underestimated SA, as at least 60% low-risk and 90% moderate-risk patients had SA.

Limitations

The main limitation is the small sample size.

Conclusions

This study provides the first multiterritorial assessment of SA in psoriasis, revealing a high prevalence of early disease. Femoral arteries were most affected, correlating with coronary atherosclerosis. The high SA detection within low-/intermediate-risk individuals suggests recalibrating CV scores for establishing effective preventive measures.

Key words: atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, inflammation, psoriasis, epidemiology

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name ga1.jpg


Capsule Summary.

  • This research presents evidence to support the reclassification of cardiovascular risk stratification in psoriasis, suggesting techniques to improve the prediction of coronary atherosclerosis risk, particularly in individuals deemed low risk by conventional methodologies.

  • The findings could help facilitate informed clinical decision-making and earlier therapeutic interventions, contributing to improved patient outcomes.

Introduction

Psoriasis is associated with a 4-year decrease in life expectancy as a result of an accelerated subclinical atherosclerosis (SA), which can lead to increases in cardiovascular (CV) events at younger ages than the general population.1,2

Despite the recognized systemic inflammatory role in psoriasis, CV disease (CVD) association,3,4 clinical risk stratification remains limited. This is due to infrequent early atherosclerosis assessment and traditional scores underestimating CV risk in this inflamed population.5,6 Cardiology guidelines now include psoriasis as an independent CVD risk factor (CVRF) and recommend statin therapy for patients with intermediate-risk psoriasis based on CV scores.7,8

The use of vascular imaging techniques could help to bridge this gap. Atherosclerosis, the main cause of mortality worldwide, develops decades before fatal events occur.9 Plaque detection through noninvasive imaging techniques has become the cornerstone for identifying atherosclerosis in asymptomatic individuals (SA), allowing for the implementation of primary prevention strategies. Considering the systemic nature of atherosclerosis, a multiterritorial approach may be crucial for a comprehensive disease evaluation. The Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis study exemplifies this approach by using imaging techniques to assess SA across multiple vascular territories, revealing a high SA prevalence in asymptomatic middle-aged adults from the general population. So far, atherosclerosis detection in psoriasis through imaging has been limited to individual vascular territories (either peripheral or coronary alone),6,10, 11, 12 lacking a multiterritorial approach, which would allow to better understand SA distribution within a highly inflamed population, including peripheral and coronary arteries, which is associated with a poorer prognosis in psoriasis, and may allow for a more accurate stratification of CV risk.

The aim of this study is to assess SA prevalence, distribution, and burden in psoriasis using vascular ultrasound (VUS) of peripheral arteries and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the Early Detection and Progression of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Psoriasis (ESDAP) cohort.13 We also aim to compare the effectiveness of established CV risk scores and these imaging modalities for early SA detection in the psoriasis population, to identify the best CV risk stratification methods.

Methods

Study population

This study included 120 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis from the EDSAP cohort, with a protocol previously reported and approved (HIP/CI-BIOB-058-01).13 The study followed Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.14 Patients did not have prior clinical history of CVD, met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, and were examined for the assessment of CVRFs, clinical risk scores (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD], systematic coronary risk evaluation-2 [SCORE2], the 10-year risk of coronary heart disease from the Framingham Heart Study [FHS], and predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease events [PREVENT]), and blood sampling (Supplementary Methods, available via Mendeley at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/wzptvv27vx/1).

SA assessment and definition

All patients underwent screening for SA. The coronary territory was assessed by noncontrast computed tomography (CT) and CCTA imaging, performed with a 320-detector CT scanner (Aquilion ONE ViSION) at the Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro (Madrid, Spain). Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was calculated with the Agatston method. Acquisition of 2DVUS images in the femoral and carotid arteries was performed with a Philips iU22 ultrasound system (Philips Healthcare) at Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Madrid, Spain). Detailed information on image acquisition procedures is provided in the Supplementary Methods section. SA was defined as the presence of atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid, femoral, or coronary arteries, or as CACS ≥ 1. SA extent was categorized by affected vascular territories (carotids, femorals, and coronaries). Patients were grouped as disease-free (0 sites), focal (1 site), or multivessel (2-5 sites). For the SA burden analysis, patients were divided into low (0-1 sites) and high (2-5 sites).

Statistical analysis plan

Data were presented as mean ± SD (normal distribution) or median and IQR (skewed). Linear regression analyzed continuous variables’ association with SA, whereas logistic regression assessed categorical variables and peripheral plaque presence with coronary parameters. Associations between SA in the femoral and carotid territories were examined using logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex. Diagnostic performance, including positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV, respectively), was evaluated if carotid and femoral plaques indicated a higher likelihood of obstructive coronary plaque. Analysis of variance and post hoc tests compared patient groups with free/focal/multiple vascular territory involvement. Free/focal groups were combined due to similarities, creating low (free/focal) and high (multiple territories) SA burden groups, facilitating clearer comparison of clinical and demographic characteristics between groups (Table I).

Table I.

Results of the post hoc analysis (Bonferroni test) for the comparison of basal characteristics between the groups of patients with different territories affected (focal, free, and multiple)

Patient data Free (N = 27) Focal (N = 27) Multiple (N = 65) P value Free vs focal Free vs multiple Focal vs multiple
Demographics and clinical characteristics
Age, y 41.48 (6.36) 44.40 (6.69) 52.43 (6.88) <.001 0.339 <0.001 <0.001
Male, n (%) 21 (78%) 18 (66.6%) 48 (74%) .68 0.362 0.692 0.486
BMI, kg/m2 25.76 (23.60-28.27) 26.72 (23.91-33.95) 30.18 (27.77-32.09) .003 0.334 0.023 1.00
Waist circumference, cm 94 (85-99) 97.5 (89-113) 106 (102-115) <.001 0.196 0.003 0.754
Metabolic syndrome, n (%) 5 (19%) 4 (15%) 32 (50%) <.001 0.715 0.005 0.002
Statin use, n (%) 1 (4%) 4 (15%) 23 (35%) .002 0.159 0.002 0.048
Metabolic and inflammatory characterization
HOMA-IR 1.67 (1.05-2.51) 1.58 (1.32-2.59) 2.06 (1.49-3.43) .086 1.00 0.271 0.726
Total-c, mg/dL 187.37 (32.31) 209.44 (29.13) 204.73 (29.13) .043 0.063 0.093 1.00
LDL-c, mg/dL 118.18 (24.92) 136.81 (22.76) 129.90 (35.51) .082 0.085 0.3 0.99
HDL-c, mg/dL 48 (41-62) 50 (45-57) 45 (39.5-52.5) .079 1.00 0.575 0.231
his 36.68 (7.71) 39.09 (8.57) 41.09 (6.56) .035 0.699 0.033 0.711
hs-CRP, mg/L 1.6 (0.85-2.6) 1.6 (1.15-3.75) 2.7 (1.5-6.5) .065 1.00 0.335 0.615
Leukocytes 6590 (5700-7620) 6420 (5830-8410) 7410 (6190-8680) .17 1.00 0.162 0.647
CV risk factors
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 7 (26%) 9 (33%) 41 (64%) <.001 0.551 0.001 0.007
Hypertension, (%) 7 (26%) 6 (22%) 932 (41%) .018 0.75 0.039 0.017
Current smoker, n (%) .024 0.54 0.005 0.14
 No 14 (52%) 10 (37%) 12 (18%)
 Yes 8 (30%) 11 (41%) 30 (46%)
Ex-smoker 5 (19%) 6 (22%) 23 (22%)
Diabetes mellitus II, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (11%) .046 - 0.076 0.076
Psoriasis characterization
PASI 10 (8-14) 8 (5-13) 8 (5-11.5) .059 1.00 0.156 0.380
BSA 10 (6.5-17.5) 8 (5-10) 7 (5-10) .077 1.00 0.07 0.696
Psoriasis duration (y) 15.5 (11-31) 18 (10-30) 15 (8 -30) .76 1.00 1.00 1.00
Psoriatic arthritis, n (%) 3 (11%) 2 (7%) 18 (28%) .038 0.639 0.084 0.032
Atherosclerosis characterization
Femoral atheroma plaque 0 (0%) 9 (33%) 59 (91%) <.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Carotid atheroma plaque 0 (0%) 8 (30%) 51 (78%) <.001 0.002 <0.001 <0.001
Coronary atheroma plaque 0 (0%) 10 (37%) 51 (78%) <.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
CACS 0 (0) 3.07 (8.56) 97.03 (196.42) .002 1.00 0.013 0.017
Cardiovascular scores
SCORE2 2.1 (1.3-2.7) 2.6 (1.7-3.1) 4.5 (2.9-5.75) <.001 1.00 <0.001 <0.001
QRISK3 2.2 (1.7-3.6) 3 (1.6-6.2) 8.4 (5.2-13.5) <.001 0.8 <0.001 <0.001
ASCVD 1.8 (1-2.6) 3.2 (1-4.8) 7.9 (3.75-13.4) <.001 0.992 <0.001 <0.001
FRS-10 y 4.51 (3.34-6.77) 6.51 (4.34-10.67) 15.13 (6.78-23.63) <.001 1.00 <0.001 <0.001
PREVENT-10 y 2.65 (1.8-3.1) 3 (1.9-4.1) 7.1 (4.2-10.7) <.001 1.00 <0.001 <0.001

Values reported in the table as median (IQR) for skewed quantitative variables, as mean (SD) and number (percentage) for categorical ones. Values shown in bold represent statistically significant results, defined as P < .005.

ASCVD, Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; CV, cardiovascular; FRS-10 y, Framingham 10-year risk score; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model of assessment for insulin resistance; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HSI, hepatic steatosis index; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; PASI, psoriasis area and severity index; PREVENT, predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease events; QRISK3, QRESEARCH, risk estimator version 3; SCORE2, systematic coronary risk evaluation-2.

Results

A total of 120 patients with psoriasis were middle-aged (48.04 ± 8.25 years), and most of them were male (73.3%). The most prevalent CVRF was dyslipidemia (48.7%), followed by smoking (41.7%) and hypertension (38.3%). Patients with psoriasis had moderate-to-severe disease (median psoriasis area and severity index, 8.25 [5.5-13]), and 19.2% had psoriatic arthritis (n = 23) (Table II). One individual had noninterpretable images, and thus, 99.2% completed data for analysis.

Table II.

Clinical, inflammatory, risk, and imaging characteristics of the Early Detection of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Psoriasis cohort and across atherosclerosis categories (no disease, focal or 1 site affected, and multivessel disease)

Total (N = 120) No disease (N = 27) Focal disease (N = 27) Multivessel disease (N = 65) P value
Clinical characteristics
Age, y 48.04 (8.25) 41.48 (6.36) 44.40 (6.69) 52.43 (6.88) <.001
Male, n (%) 88 (73.3%) 21 (78%) 18 (66.6%) 48 (74%) .68
BMI, kg/m2 28.38 (25.25-32.44) 25.76 (23.60-28.27) 26.72 (23.91-33.95) 30.18 (27.77-32.09) .003
Waist circumference, cm 104 (92-110) 94 (85-99) 97.5 (89-113) 106 (102-115) <.001
Metabolic syndrome, n (%) 42 (35.3%) 5 (19%) 4 (15%) 32 (50%) <.001
Statin use, n (%) 28 (23.3%) 1 (4%) 4 (15%) 23 (35%) .002
Metabolic and inflammatory characterization
HOMA-IR 1.86 (1.36-2.64) 1.67 (1.05-2.51) 1.58 (1.32-2.59) 2.06 (1.49-3.43) .086
Total-c, mg/dL 202.00 (35.18) 187.37 (32.31) 209.44 (29.13) 204.73 (29.13) .043
LDL-c, mg/dL 128.67 (31.10) 118.18 (24.92) 136.81 (22.76) 129.90 (35.51) .082
HDL-c, mg/dL 47 (40-54) 48 (41-62) 50 (45-57) 45 (39.5-52.5) .079
HSI 39.67 (7.44) 36.68 (7.71) 39.09 (8.57) 41.09 (6.56) .035
hs-CRP, mg/L 2.1 (1.3-4.59) 1.6 (.85-2.6) 1.6 (1.15-3.75) 2.7 (1.5-6.5) .065
Leukocytes 7100 (5950-8340) 6590 (5700-7620) 6420 (5830-8410) 7410 (6190-8680) .17
CV risk factors
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 58 (48.7%) 7 (26%) 9 (33%) 41 (64%) <.001
Hypertension, (%) 46 (38.3%) 7 (26%) 6 (22%) 932 (41%) .018
Current smoker, n (%) 50 (41.7%) 8 (30%) 11 (41%) 30 (46%) .024
DM II, n (%) 7 (5.8%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 7 (11%) .046
Psoriasis characterization
PASI 8.25 (5.5-13) 10 (8-14) 8 (5-13) 8 (5-11.5) .059
BSA 8 (6-12) 10 (6.5-17.5) 8 (5-10) 7 (5-10) .077
Psoriasis duration (y) 16 (10-30) 15.5 (11-31) 18 (10-30) 15 (8 -30) .76
Psoriatic arthritis, n (%) 23 (19.2%) 3 (11%) 2 (7%) 18 (28%) .038
Atherosclerosis characterization
Femoral plaque 68 (57.1%) 0 (0%) 9 (33%) 59 (91%) <.001
Carotid plaque 59 (49.6%) 0 (0%) 8 (30%) 51 (78%) <.001
Coronary plaque 61 (51.3%) 0 (0%) 10 (37%) 51 (78%) <.001
Coronary obstructive plaque ≥ 50% 25 (21.2%) 0 (0%) 4 (15%) 21 (33%) .001
CACS, n (%) 43 (35.8%) 0 (0%) 5 (19%) 37 (57%) <.001
CACS (AU) 52.89 (151.33) 0 (0) 3.07 (8.52) 97.03 (196.42) .002

Values reported in the table as median (IQR) for skewed quantitative variables, as mean (SD) and number (percentage) for categorical ones. Values shown in bold represent statistically significant results, defined as P < .005.

Comparisons between groups were conducted using analysis of variance for parametric quantitative variables or Kruskal-Wallis for nonparametric ones; comparisons regarding qualitative variables were conducted using the χ2 test.

AU, Agatston units; BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; CV, cardiovascular; DM, diabetes mellitus; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model of assessment for insulin resistance; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HSI, hepatic steatosis index; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; PASI, psoriasis area and severity index.

SA in psoriasis: prevalence and relation between carotid, femoral, and coronary atherosclerosis

Overall SA prevalence was 77% (n = 92), accounting for 57.1% (n = 68) for the femorals, 51.3% (n = 61) for the coronaries, and 49.6% (n = 59) for the carotids (Fig 1). For those having coronary plaques, the mean CACS was 104.88 ± 200.65 AU, and obstructive coronary plaque was identified in 41% (n = 25). For patients with 0 CACS (n = 77), 19 (24.6%) presented nonobstructive plaques, and 7 (9%) had obstructive disease.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Subclinical atherosclerosis prevalence of the Early Detection of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Psoriasis (EDSAP) cohort. Baseline imaging studies and atherosclerosis distribution for the 120 patients with psoriasis. CCTA, Coronary computed tomography angiography.

Further analysis of patients with obstructive coronary plaques (n = 25) showed that 76% (n = 19) had peripheral plaques, 84% (n = 21) had femoral plaques, and 76% (n = 19) had carotid plaques. There was a high NPV for excluding obstructive coronary plaques in the absence of peripheral disease (91.9%), slighter higher for the absence of femoral plaques (92.2%) compared to the absence of carotid plaques (90%). Additionally, 43.2% of patients with detectable femoral and carotid plaques were likely to have obstructive coronary plaque (Table III). In fact, the presence of femoral plaque showed the best association with all coronary parameters: obstructive coronary plaque by CCTA, as shown in Table IV.

Table III.

Positive predictive value and negative predictive value for obstructive coronary plaque by screening femoral and carotid plaque

Femoral and carotid plaque 95% CI
Sensitivity 76% 54.9-90.6
Specificity 73.1% 62.9-81.8
ROC area 0.75 0.65-0.84
Positive predictive value 43.2% 28.3-59
Negative predictive value 91.9% 83.2-97
Femoral plaque
Sensitivity 84% 63.9-95.5
Specificity 50.5% 40-61.1
ROC area 0.67 0.58-0.76
Positive predictive value 31.3% 20.6-43.8
Negative predictive value 92.2% 81.1-97.8
Carotid plaque
Sensitivity 76% 54.9-90.6
Specificity 58.1% 47.4-68.2
ROC area 0.67 0.57-0.77
Positive predictive value 32.8% 21-46.3
Negative predictive value 90% 79.5-96.2

ROC, Receiver operating characteristic.

Table IV.

Association of femoral and carotid plaques and high-risk patients according to different cardiovascular scores with coronary atherosclerosis

Obstructive coronary plaque
Coronary plaque presence
CACS
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Femoral plaque 5.62 (1.9-20.3) .003 5.02 (2.3-11.3) <.001 7.95 (3.1-23.0) <.001
Femoral plaque (adjusted) 2.5 (0.7-10.5) .176 1.24 (0.4-3.3) .682 1.96 (0.6-6.6) .259
Carotid plaque 4.62 (1.7-13.6) .003 4.56 (2.1-10.1) <.001 3.27 (1.4-7.4) .004
Carotid plaque (adjusted) 3.09 (1.0-10.0) .047 2.65 (1.0-6.9) .041 1.4 (0.5-3.7) .506
SCORE2 1.5 (1.2-1.8) <.001 1.83 (1.4-2.3) <.001 1.76 (1.4-2.2) <.001
PREVENT 1.2 (1.0-1.3) <.001 1.49 (1.2-1.8) <.001 1.35 (1.2-1.5) <.001
ASCVD 1.17 (1.0-1.2) <.001 1.32 (1.1-1.5) <.007 1.27 (1.1-1.4) <.001
FRS 10-y 1.09 (1.0-1.1) <.001 1.18 (1.1-1.2) <.001 1.14 (1.0-1.2) <.001

Values shown in bold represent statistically significant results, defined as P < .005.

ASCVD, Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CACS, coronary artery calcium score; FRS-10 y, Framingham 10-year risk score; OR, odds ratio; PREVENT, predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease events; SCORE2, systematic coronary risk evaluation-2.

SA by age and CVRFs

Multiterritorial SA distribution according to median patient age was explored, including all patients with any SA (Fig 2), being notably prevalent among younger subjects (30-48 years), accounting for 34.8% of patients with atherosclerosis with at least 1 affected territory. The prevalence and extent across all vascular territories increased with age in the 49 to 65 age group, being SA prevalence almost twice as high (65.2%).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Distribution of noncoronary and coronary subclinical atherosclerosis by median population age. The distribution of patients with psoriasis with atherosclerosis (n = 92) in peripheral or coronary territories according to the median age of the Early Detection of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Psoriasis cohort (48 years).

Regarding the association between CVRFs and SA burden, the high-burden group had a significant higher median age (52.43 ± 6.88 vs 42.94 ± 6.64 years; P ≤ .001); higher prevalence of CVRF and metabolic syndrome (50%, n = 32 in the high-burden group vs 17%, n = 9 in the low-burden group, P < .001); higher insulin resistance levels (median and IQR: 2.06 [1.49-3.43] vs 1.64 [1.26-2.51]; P = .029); and higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (median and IQR: 2.7 [1.5-6.5] vs 1.6 [0.95-2.6]; P = .021) than the low-burden group (Table V). Interestingly, the femoral territory was the most frequent site with plaques in the 49 to 65 age group, whereas carotids were more commonly affected in those under the age of 48 years. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the association of SA with psoriatic arthritis and disease duration, yielding no statistically significant results (Table VI).

Table V.

Comparison of basal characteristics between patients with low atherosclerosis burden (no and focal disease) and patients with high atherosclerosis burden (2-5 sites affected)

Low burden (N = 54) High burden (N = 65) P value
Demographics and clinical characteristics
Age, y 42.94 (6.64) 52.43 (6.88) <.001
Male, n (%) 39 (72%) 48 (74%) .84
BMI, kg/m2 25.91 (23.91-32.14) 30.18 (27.77-32.09) .002
Waist circumference, cm 95 (87-107) 106 (102-115) <.001
Metabolic syndrome, n (%) 9 (17%) 32 (50%) <.001
Statin use, n (%) 5 (9%) 23 (35%) <.001
Metabolic and inflammatory characterization
HOMA-IR 1.64 (1.26-2.51) 2.06 (1.49-3.43) .029
Total-c, mg/dL 198.40 (32.44) 204.73 (29.13) .33
LDL-c, mg/dL 127.5 (25.43) 129.90 (35.51) .68
HDL-c, mg/dL 49.5 (42-57) 45 (39.5-52.5) .037
HSI 37.91 (8.17) 41.09 (6.56) .021
hs-CRP, mg/L 1.6 (0.95-2.6) 2.7 (1.5-6.5) .021
Leukocytes 6420 (5820-7830) 7410 (6190-8680) .063
CV risk factors
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 16 (30%) 41 (64%) <.001
Hypertension, (%) 13 (24%) 32 (49%) .005
Current smoker, n (%) .008
DM II, n (%) 0 (0%) 7 (11%) .013
Psoriasis characterization
PASI 9.4 (7-14) 8 (5-11.5) .036
BSA 8.5 (6-15) 7 (5-10) .09
Psoriasis duration (y) 17 (11-30.5) 15 (8 -30) .6
Psoriatic arthritis, n (%) 5 (9%) 18 (28%) .011
Atherosclerosis characterization
Femoral plaque 9 (17%) 59 (91%) <.001
Carotid plaque 8 (15%) 51 (78%) <.001
Coronary plaque 10 (19%) 51 (78%) <.001
Coronary obstructive plaque ≥ 50% 4 (7%) 21 (33%) <.001
CACS, n (%) 5 (9%) 37 (59%) <.001
CACS (AU) 1.53 (6.19) 97.03 (196.42) <.001

Values reported in the table as median (IQR) for skewed quantitative variables, as mean (SD) and number (percentage) for categorical ones. Values shown in bold represent statistically significant results, defined as P < .005.

AU, Agatston units; BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; CACS, coronary artery calcium score; CV, cardiovascular; DM, diabetes mellitus; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model of assessment for insulin resistance; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HSI, hepatic steatosis index; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index.

Table VI.

Atherosclerosis distribution across different clinical subtypes

Psoriatic arthritis
P value Psoriasis duration
P value
No (N = 97) Yes (N = 23) <16 y (N = 62) ≥16 y (N = 57)
SA presence 72 (75.0%) 20 (87.0%) .219 47 (77.0%) 45 (78.9%) .804
Femoral plaque 52 (54.2%) 16 (69.6%) .18 35 (57.4%) 33 (57.9%) .955
Carotid plaque 45 (46.9%) 14 (60.9%) .228 27 (44.3%) 32 (56.1%) .197
Coronary plaque 45 (46.9%) 16 (69.6%) .051 34 (55.7%) 27 (47.4%) .363
Obstructive coronary plaque 20 (20.8%) 9 (40.9%) .542 15 (24.6%) 10 (17.9%) .375

Patients were divided into groups according to the median disease duration (years).

SA, Subclinical atherosclerosis.

The relationship between SA presence and CV risk scores in psoriasis

The FHS 10-year score yielded the highest risk of the whole cohort, with a 12.33%, followed by ASCVD (5.94%), PREVENT (5.78%), and SCORE2 (3.69%). As shown in Fig 3A, among patients classified as low–moderate risk by the SCORE2, 72% had SA, including 45% of high SA burden, and 80% of the high-risk patients were classified in the high SA burden group. Similarly, among participants with low FHS 10-year risk (Fig 3B), 62% had SA, and 33% of them belonged to the high-burden group. In the moderate-risk group, SA was present in 97% of the participants, with multiple territories affected in 77%. All patients in the SCORE2 very high-risk group, and the FHS 10-year high-risk group had SA. The relation between the extent of SA and the groups who met the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology criteria for statin therapy is shown in Fig 3C. All patients classified as moderate risk (5%-7.5%) had SA, with 78% of them having multiple vascular territories affected. SA was present in 64% of the low-risk ASCVD group. Another analysis was performed to explore SA according to the PREVENT risk algorithm (Fig 3D). The results revealed a substantial prevalence of SA across all risk groups. In the low-risk group, 63% of patients exhibited SA. This prevalence increased markedly in the moderate-risk group, where 98% of participants had SA. Notably, within the moderate-risk group, nearly 89% demonstrated a high atherosclerosis burden.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Relationship between subclinical atherosclerosis (SA) and risk categories according to clinical risk scores. (A) Systematic coronary risk evaluation-2 (SCORE2) risk was classified as low–moderate (<2.5%), high (≥2.5%-7.5%), or very high (≥7.5%) risk of patients <50 years; or low–moderate (<5%), high (≥5%-10%), or very high (≥10%) risk of patients >50 years. (B) Framingham Heart Study (FHS) 10-year risk score was classified as low (<10%), moderate (≥10%-20%), or high (≥20%). (C) Risk was classified as low (<5%), moderate (≥5%-7.5%), and high (≥7.5%). According to the cardiology guidelines for initiation of statin therapy, psoriasis is considered a risk-enhancing factor in patients with moderate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk (≥5%-7.5%). (D) Predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (PREVENT).

Discussion

The most important findings are as follows: (1) multiterritorial SA is highly prevalent in middle-aged patients with psoriasis; (2) femoral arteries are the most affected vascular territory; (3) the presence of femoral plaques by VUS show the strongest associations with coronary plaques by CCTA, including obstructive atherosclerosis; (4) peripheral plaque has a very high NPV for obstructive coronary plaques; and (5) a substantial proportion of patients with psoriasis, despite being classified as low risk based on CV risk scores exhibit extensive SA, underestimating the actual CV. To our knowledge, this is the most complete study evaluating SA in psoriasis, using imaging techniques with the potential to improve CV risk stratification, especially in apparently low-risk patients, providing a comprehensive assessment of SA prevalence, distribution, and burden among multiple vascular territories.

Prevalence, vascular distribution, and burden of atherosclerosis in psoriasis: early detection as a window for preventive measures

Multiterritorial SA prevalence in the EDSAP cohort was higher compared to that observed in general population studies, such as Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis or Aragon Workers’ Health Study (Fig 4), likely attributable to the increased CV risk of patients with psoriasis due to the systemic inflammatory nature of the disease. A high prevalence of coronary artery plaque detected by CCTA has been observed in the EDSAP cohort. Interestingly, the femoral arteries in all studies were the most frequently affected site in all these middle-aged cohorts.5,15 Regarding patients with a high SA burden, we found significantly higher levels of insulin resistance via the homeostatic model of assessment for insulin resistance and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein compared to patients with a low SA burden. The elevated homeostatic model of assessment for insulin resistance levels could suggest an accelerated atherogenesis partly mediated by insulin resistance mechanisms, a well-known CVRF strongly associated with psoriasis.16 Elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, a classic biomarker of systemic inflammation, is associated with incident CV events,17 and has recently been proposed as a useful marker for predicting future risk of CVD in patients with psoriasis.18

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in 3 contemporaneous cohort studies: Aragon Workers’ Health Study (AWHS), Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis (PESA), and Early Detection and Progression of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Psoriasis (EDSAP). Prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis by vascular territory in males in the AWHS, PESA, and EDSAP. CACS, Coronary artery calcium score; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography.

Femoral and carotid plaque as promising predictors for coronary atherosclerosis in psoriasis

An innovation of the EDSAP study is the early detection of coronary SA by CCTA, even in the absence of CACS. A CACS = 0 could be considered a predictor of no atherosclerosis, but among our participants, 64% had no coronary calcification, but 51% had coronary plaques, in line with Lerman et al19 study, showing high noncalcified coronary burden in these patients. Therefore, the absence of CACS does not necessarily indicate the absence of disease. Recently, a narrative review has stated that the use of CCTA in the context of inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis could be a better tool for CVD management in this high-risk population than other methods used before, such as CACS, because it can miss early signs of atherosclerosis before calcification happens.1 Beyond the detection of coronary plaque, our study leverages CCTA to additionally assess the obstructive coronary plaque, detected in 1 of 5 individuals in our sample and 41% of those with any coronary plaques.

In psoriasis, it has been stated that femoral plaque screening with VUS improves SA detection, but its association with coronary SA has not been explored.16 Our findings revealed a high NPV of peripheral plaque by VUS to predict obstructive coronary disease, meaning that 91.9% of individuals free of carotid or femoral plaques had no obstructive coronary plaques. The positive predictive value demonstrated that approximately 43% of patients with both femoral and carotid plaques were likely to have concomitant coronary obstruction. These results suggest that VUS of peripheral arteries may serve as a useful noninvasive screening tool to identify candidate patients for a coronary CCTA.

In our study, the femoral plaque detected by VUS showed the strongest associations with all coronary parameters by CCTA. These results align with previous findings from our group, which proposed the femoral territory as a superior predictor of SA in psoriasis.16 It is noteworthy to mention that, despite the high association of femoral plaque to coronary atherosclerosis, the presence of atheroma plaques in the carotids also strongly associates with coronary SA. Although the implementation of CCTA in routine clinical practice can be challenging due to accessibility, the aforementioned association between peripheral and coronary atherosclerosis suggests and reinforces that VUS screening could serve as a valuable and effective tool for the early detection of coronary SA.

Limited value of clinical risk scores in low- to moderate-risk patients with psoriasis

CV risk in psoriasis remains significantly underestimated by conventional scores. FHS 10-year and SCORE2 scores underscore CV risk both in the general population5,15 and in psoriasis,6 which translates to a substantial excess burden of CVD and mortality. When looking at the different risk categories, all individuals at high risk had atherosclerosis. Similarly, most patients classified as moderate risk had at least 1 atherosclerotic plaque. This agrees with the statement from the 2018 American Cardiology guidelines, considering psoriasis as a risk-enhancing factor for the initiation of statin therapy in individuals classified as moderate by ASCVD.7 Moreover, 64% patients classified as low risk had atherosclerosis, with half of them having multiple vascular territories affected (33%). The PREVENT algorithm, developed and validated by the American Heart Association, stands out for including renal function. Nevertheless, the PREVENT risk equations continue to underestimate CVD risk in patients with psoriasis. Similar to other scores, 98% of patients classified as moderate risk had SA, with 89% of them having a high SA burden. Together, our findings provide clear evidence of SA under diagnosis in psoriasis by risk scores used in clinical practice, highlighting the need for more robust risk stratification measures in this population to better guide statin use and other preventive interventions.

The main limitations are the small sample size, the lack of a control group, and its cross-sectional nature, which has a limited capacity to evaluate clinical events. The absence of a control group or another high-risk reference group limits the possibility of defining appropriate reference values, limiting the interpretation of the magnitude and specificity of the vascular alterations observed in patients with psoriasis. In addition, patients were not stratified by clinical subtype, disease duration, or treatment status—factors that could influence the risk of SA and introduce heterogeneity. Follow-up studies will help clarify the clinical significance of early detection of SA in psoriasis. Strengths of this study are the collection of clinical and imaging data following rigorous protocols, ensuring the reliability and accuracy.

Conclusion

Multiterritorial SA by imaging techniques was highly prevalent (77%) in this middle-aged, asymptomatic cohort of patients with psoriasis, being the femoral territory the most affected. Femoral plaques showed the strongest associations with obstructive coronary plaques as well as a high NPV, highlighting the value of screening this territory. An elevated number of patients exhibited coronary plaque despite having zero CACS, suggesting the incremental role of CCTA. Because a substantial proportion of low-to-moderate-risk participants had extensive SA, imaging of early atherosclerosis may be of interest.

Conflicts of interest

Dr Mehta is a full-time US government employee and has served as a consultant for several pharmaceutical companies, receiving grants and/or research funding; as a principal investigator for the NIH, receiving grants and/or research funding. Dr Gelfand served as a consultant AbbVie, Artax (DSMB), BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celldex (DSMB), FIDE (which is sponsored by multiple pharmaceutical companies) GSK, Inmagene (DSMB), Twill, Lilly (DMC), Leo, Moonlake (DSMB), Janssen Biologics, Novartis Corp, UCB (DSMB), Neuroderm (DSMB), and Veolia North America receiving honoraria; receives research grants (to the trustees of the University of Pennsylvania) from Amgen, BMS, and Pfizer Inc; and received payment for continuing medical education work related to psoriasis that was supported indirectly pharmaceutical sponsors. Dr Gelfand is a co-patent holder of resiquimod for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Dr Gelfand is a deputy editor for the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, receiving honoraria from the Society for Investigative Dermatology, is the chief medical editor for Healio Dermatology (receiving honoraria), and is a member of the board of directors for the International Psoriasis Council and the Medical Dermatology Society, receiving no honoraria. Dr González-Cantero has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Lilly, Almirall, UCB, BMS, Celgene, and LEO Pharma, receiving grants/other payments outside the submitted work. Dr Ballester-Martínez has served as a consultant for several pharmaceutical companies, receiving grants/other payments. Dr Llamas-Velasco has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Lilly, Almirall, UCB, BMS, Celgene, and LEO Pharma, receiving grants/other payments outside the submitted work. Dr Berna-Rico has received honoraria from UCN and LEO Pharma outside the submitted work. Drs Abbad-Jaime de Aragon, Lecumberri, Perez-Bootello, Neria-Serrano, Monge, Pindado-Ortega, Castellanos-González, Wasniewski, Barderas, Solís, Fernández-Friera, and Jaén and Author Davó-Mogica have no interests to disclose.

Acknowledgments

We thank the study participants and gratefully acknowledge the collaboration and assistance of the staff at Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Hospital HM Sanchinarro, National Institute of Health, Hospital 12 de Octubre, and Atria Clinic. We would also like to thank the dedication and impeccable management of the biological samples to all the members of the Biobank of the Hospital Ramón y Cajal. Finally, we are very grateful to all the participants in the EDSAP study; without them, this would not have been possible.

Footnotes

Drs Abbad-Jaime de Aragon and Berna-Rico contributed equally as first authors.

Drs Fernández-Friera and González-Cantero contributed equally as corresponding authors.

Funding sources: The Early Detection of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Psoriasis study is funded by competitive independent grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain (PI22/01847) and the National Psoriasis Foundation, USA (851908), and also by noncompetitive investigator-initiated studies (LEO Pharma, Almirall, and Amgen).

Patient consent: Consent for the publication of recognizable patient photographs or other identifiable material was obtained by the authors and included at the time of article submission to the journal, stating that all patients gave consent with the understanding that this information may be publicly available.

IRB approval status: The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital Ramón y Cajal in Madrid (HIP/CI-BIOB-058-01).

Our data will be published in a timely manner at the conclusion of the follow-up period and will be made available on request.

Contributor Information

Leticia Fernández-Friera, Email: leticia.fernandezfriera@atria.clinic.

Álvaro González-Cantero, Email: alvarogc261893@hotmail.com.

References

  • 1.Peverelli M., Maughan R.T., Gopalan D., et al. Use of coronarycomputed tomography for cardiovascular risk assessment in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Heart [Internet] 2024;110(8):545–551. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abuabara K., Azfar R.S., Shin D.B., Neimann A.L., Troxel A.B., Gelfand J.M. Cause-specific mortality in patients with severe psoriasis: a population-based cohort study in the U.K. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163(3):586–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09941.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Späh F. Inflammation in atherosclerosis and psoriasis: common pathogenic mechanisms and the potential for an integrated treatment approach. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(s2):10–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08780.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Armstrong A.W., Voyles S.V., Armstrong E.J., Fuller E.N., Rutledge J.C. A tale of two plaques: convergent mechanisms of T-cell-mediated inflammation in psoriasis and atherosclerosis. Exp Dermatol. 2011;20(7):544–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01308.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fernández-Friera L., Peñalvo J.L., Fernández-Ortiz A., et al. Prevalence, vascular distribution, and multiterritorial extent of subclinical atherosclerosis in a middle-aged cohort: the PESA (progression of early subclinical atherosclerosis) study. Circulation. 2015;131(24):2104–2113. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gonzalez-Cantero A., Reddy A.S., Dey A.K., et al. Underperformance of clinical risk scores in identifying imaging-based high cardiovascular risk in psoriasis: results from two observational cohorts. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29(4):591–598. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grundy S.M., Stone N.J., Bailey A.L., et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082–e1143. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Visseren F.L.J., Mach F., Smulders Y.M., et al. 2021 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: developed by the Task Force for cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227–3337. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barquera S., Pedroza-Tobías A., Medina C., Hernández-Barrera L., Bibbins-Domingo K., Lozano R., et al. Global overview of the epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Arch Med Res. 2015;46(5):328–338. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2015.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Armstrong A.W., Harskamp C.T., Ledo L., Rogers J.H., Armstrong E.J. Coronary artery disease in patients with psoriasis referred for coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(7):976–980. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mansouri B., Kivelevitch D., Natarajan B., Joshi A.A., Ryan C., Benjegerdes K., et al. Comparison of coronary artery calcium scores between patients with psoriasis and type 2 diabetes. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(11):1244–1253. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.2907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abdelrahman K.M., Chen M.Y., Dey A.K., et al. Computed tomography angiography from clinical uses to emerging technologies: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(10):1226–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Abbad-Jaime de Aragón C., Berna-Rico E., Ballester-Martinez M.A., et al. Early detection and progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in psoriasis (EDSAP): protocol for an observational, single-centre, prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2023;13 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.von Elm E., Altman D.G., Egger M., et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Laclaustra M., Casasnovas J.A., Fernández-Ortiz A., et al. Femoral and carotid subclinical atherosclerosis association with risk factors and coronary calcium: the AWHS study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(11):1263–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gonzalez-Cantero A., Gonzalez-Cantero J., Sanchez-Moya A.I., et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis in psoriasis. Usefulness of femoral artery ultrasound for the diagnosis, and analysis of its relationship with insulin resistance. PLOS One. 2019;14(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ridker P.M., Rifai N., Rose L., Buring J.E., Cook N.R. Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(20):1557–1565. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Niknezhad N., Haghighatkhah H.R., Zargari O., et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a biomarker in detecting subclinical atherosclerosis in psoriasis. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(4) doi: 10.1111/dth.13628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lerman J.B., Joshi A.A., Chaturvedi A., et al. Coronary plaque characterization in psoriasis reveals high-risk features that improve after treatment in a prospective observational study. Circulation. 2017;136(3):263–276. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAAD International are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES