Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 2.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015 Jun 19;26:60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.06.003

The morphotype heterogeneity in Cryptococcus neoformans

Linqi Wang 1,*, Xiaorong Lin 2,*
PMCID: PMC12860970  NIHMSID: NIHMS698909  PMID: 26094087

Abstract

Many environmental fungi have evolved exceptional abilities to overcome host defenses and to cause systemic infections. However, the evolutionary trajectory that gives rise to the remarkable pathogenic traits of otherwise saprophytic species is poorly understood. Recent studies suggest that social behaviors likely enhance fitness and augment virulence in the ubiquitous fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. In this regard, heterogeneity in morphotypes and the ability to switch morphotype offer flexibility and resilience for this fungus in disparate environmental and host niches. Here, we discuss the tradeoffs of different morphotypes, the complex intercellular communications that coordinate the transitions of diverse morphotypes, and how the resulting heterogeneity in morphotype provides a source of fitness.

Introduction

Wild microbes are subject to changes in environments teeming with competitors and natural stressors [1]. To cope with the biological and abiotic pressures, microbes develop complex social strategies to ensure their survival. Even within a sibling microbial community composed of genetically identical cells, there exists high heterogeneity in physiology or morphology of its sub-populations [2]. Such heterogeneity creates a source of variation/diversity that can maximize microbial survival in unpredictable environments [3].

In many facultative microbial pathogens, social behaviors are critical for both their saprophytic and pathogenic lifestyles [3-6]. The ability to cause diseases by these microbes that do not require the host to complete their normal life cycle is likely derived from their sophisticated social strategies evolved to adapt to a plethora of natural stressors [6-9], as unveiled in many environmental fungal pathogens [3,10,11]. For these pathogens, an encounter with the host is more of a nuisance than a necessity. Cryptococcus neoformans is an important environmental fungal pathogen and cryptococcal meningitis alone claims half a million deaths annually worldwide [12,13]. This fungus can exist in multiple morphotypes and there is remarkable morphological heterogeneity within a mating community or during disease progression (Figure 1) [14-17]. Cells of different morphologies differ in their virulence potential and in their resistance to a given natural stress [15,16,18,19]. Consequently, morphotype transition is controlled by coordinated cell-cell communications in response to environmental or host stimuli [20-23]. Here, we evaluate the tradeoffs offered by multiple morphotypes and their relevance to cryptococcal mating and infection. We also discuss how morphotype transition and heterogeneity might account for the success of C. neoformans by coordinating its dual lifestyles as a saprophyte and as an opportunistic pathogen.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The unique features and tradeoffs of different Cryptococcus morphotypes. The tradeoff choices are linked with multiple morphotypes, which occur during differentiation of mating community and/or during infection.

Morphotype transition and heterogeneity during mating community differentiation and sexual reproduction

C. neoformans is typically a haploid organism with two opposite mating-types, a and α [24]. This fungus can undergo two forms of sexual reproduction, α- a bisexual mating and unisexual mating (mostly α) [24,25]. It is hypothesized that the predominance of the α mating type in nature (>99%) is attributable to or a result of the α unisexual reproduction [24,26].

In C. neoformans, sexual reproduction is coupled with the development of a mating community, where successive events of transition between different morphotypes occur. These transitions create remarkably heterogeneous morphotypes within a mating community, which coordinate the progression of sexual reproduction and natural adaptation (Figure 1) [22••,25]. For instance, upon the mating stimulation, a subpopulation of yeast cells in the community quickly switch to shmoo cells [15] (Figure 1). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, shmoo cells are mating-competent cells that conduct early mating behaviors, such as the perception of the mating partner and cell-cell fusion [27]. Similarly, this shmoo morphotype is observed during mating and is controlled by the pheromone sensing pathway in Cryptococcus [23,28]. Overexpression of Mat2, the pheromone pathway output regulator, is sufficient to drive cells to differentiate into the shmoo morphotype, even under conditions extremely unfavorable to mating [29]. Thus, the shmoo morphotype likely specializes in the early mating events in C. neoformans.

C. neoformans is predominantly considered to be yeasts in nature. Occasionally, it is also observed as pseudohyphae, especially in a mating community or when cells are confronted with a protozoan predator like soil amoeba (Figure 1) [17-19,30]. Pseudohyphal morphology is widely adopted by non-mobile yeasts across the fungal kingdom. Pseudohyphae enable S. cerevisiae to forage for nutrients unavailable at a short distance [31], suggesting that this morphotype provides an alternative approach for cell migration in the environment. In addition, pseudohyphae confer C. neoformans resistance to amoeba, a natural predator of C. neoformans [32].

Hyphae also confer fungal ability to forage nutrients in distance [3,33] and resistance to amoeba predation [34]. In Cryptococcus, the transition to hyphal growth can be initiated in response to the stimuli triggering sexual reproduction (Figure 1) [11]. Both hyphal initiation and extension require the zinc-finger regulator Znf2 that functions downstream of pheromone signaling pathway or other filamentation-inducing stimuli [15,35]. Activation of ZNF2 drives hyphal growth in vitro and in vivo [15]. During sexual reproduction, Znf2 is activated and bisexual dikaryotic or unisexual monokaryotic hyphae are produced. Some of these hyphae differentiate into a specialized terminal structure termed basidium where meiosis takes place. Meiosis followed by multiple rounds of mitosis results in the production of four chains of spores, which are proposed as major infectious propagules for Cryptococcus [36]. Sexual reproduction generated hyper-virulent and drug resistant strains [37,38••] and sex may have been an important driving force for cryptococcal evolution and the long-term lineage fitness [25,38••]. Sexual reproduction and hyphal differentiation are genetically bridged [25] as hyphae are developmentally primed for sexual reproduction [38••]. Overall, the yeast-hypha transition is critical for Cryptococcus to coordinate its interactions with other species, its natural adaptation, and evolution. This morphotype transition helps balance the short term adaptive fitness and the long term lineage success (Figure 1).

Impact of morphotype transition and heterogeneity for cryptococcal pathogenicity

Non-yeast morphotypes such as shmoo, pseudohypha, and hypha are rarely detected in host tissues, consistent with the idea that they might be more critical for cryptococcal fitness in the environment. Indeed, the pseudohypha morphology is unfit for cryptococcal virulence, due to its temperature sensitivity [32]. Interestingly, pseudohyphae were able to trigger protective immune-responses in the host, indicating that this morphotype could exert strong anti-virulence effects [39]. Similarly, the hypha form is also unsuited for cryptococcal infections, and the host physiological condition is extremely inhibitory to the yeast-to-hypha transition [3,40]. Forced expression of ZNF2 in vivo attenuates cryptococcal virulence [15]. The ZNF2 overexpression cells, either viable or heat killed, can serve as vaccine to provide host protection against subsequent lethal yeast infections (Zhai et al., under review). The inverse relationship between hyphae and virulence in Cryptococcus is similar to what have been observed in other environmental fungal pathogens like Histoplasma capsulatum, Blastomyces dermatitidis, and Penicillium marneffei, suggesting that the anti-virulence property of hyphae might be conserved in these environmental pathogens [3]. This is in striking contrast to Candida albicans [41], likely because the latter has evolved as a human commensal [42]. Thus, the pseudohypha and hypha morphotypes in Cryptococcus exhibit a clear-cut tradeoff between environmental adaptation and pathogenicity in warm blooded mammals.

During lung infection, spores will convert to yeast cells [43] and a subpopulation of yeast cells become considerately enlarged (Figure 1) [21,44]. The formation of these giant cells, also known as titan cells, is concomitant with a remarkable increase in ploidy [21,44]. In fungi, ploidy change is an important adaptive strategy against stressors (Gerstein and Berman, this issue). In agreement with this notion, titan cells are resistant to phagocytosis and oxidative and nitrosative stresses [21,45]. The titan morphology can also be observed in vitro in response to poor nutrients, suggesting that it is cryptococcal inherent adaptive behavior against starvation and other environmental stressors [45]. Consistently, the ability to form titan cells is considerably impaired in the absence of functional cAMP-PKA pathway [45], which is a core pathway in fungi for sensing environmental factors. In fact, this pathway is also adopted by other fungi to control morphotypes/phenotypes in response to environmental stimuli. The importance of this pathway in morphologic plasticity is evidently shown in Candida albicans where it regulates transitions between white, opaque, gray, and gut phenotypes (Scaduto and Bennett, this issue).

Cryptococcus infection initiates in the lung and eventually it spreads to the brain, causing the fatal cryptococcal meningitis [46]. Although titan cells are observed in the lungs, these cells fail to disseminate to the brain, likely due to their size. Thus, the titan morphology likely specializes for a specific infection stage in the lung tissue [21]. Consistently, smaller size appears to expedite extrapulmonary dissemination [21]. By live imaging, Shi et al demonstrated that yeast cells switch to an ovoid-shaped morphology after being trapped in mouse brain capillaries (Figure 1) [14]. This morphotype switch might facilitate cryptococcal cells to transmigrate from the capillaries into the brain [14]. Collectively, these data suggest that engaging in the morphotype transition is coordinated with the disease progression.

Intercellular communications modulate cryptococcal morphotype heterogeneity and transition.

Microbial community is dynamic. The populations can undergo considerable reconstruction during microbial development or in response to environmental changes [2]. Cell-cell communication, through a “secrete-to-sense” circuit, can specialize subpopulations or synchronize the whole population via its control of gene expression [1,47].

To synchronize microbial behavior, extracellular signals must easily spread across the community (Figure 2b). As expected, these signals are of low-molecular-weight and highly diffusible. Quorum sensing molecules (QSM) represent the most studied group of global signals [47]. In general, QSMs facilitate microbe to sense cell density and to implement a functional or phenotypic switch in a synchronized manner. In fungi, QSM or QSM-like molecules function in the control of inoculum size-dependent behaviors. In C. albicans, QS regulation plays a fine-tuning role rather than a switch in controlling the speed and robustness of morphological transition [48]. In C. neoformans, we found that the Znf2-driven yeast-to-hypha transition is negatively affected by high inoculum when the ZNF2 overexpression strain is cultured in YPD liquid medium. The QS-like factor is yet to be identified (Wang L and Lin X, unpublished data). Despite the highly diffusible feature of QSMs, cells in a community respond to QSMs asynchronously, which may reflect the inherent heterogeneity of individual fungal cells in sensing or responding to QSMs. Such heterogeneous responses may prevent potential disastrous outcomes, should shifting of morphotype be detrimental.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The ECM signal Cfl1 might represent a local signal. (a) Cfl1 exclusively expresses in the hyphal subpopulation in a mating community. (b) A diagram indicates the different regulatory patterns of easily diffusible signals and geographically more restricted ECM signals. Highly diffusible signals exert global regulation for the community . By contrast, an ECM signal cannot diffuse efficiently across the community, resulting in stimulation limited to a subset of the population. The combination of signals of these two systems can create enormous heterogeneity in the microbial community.

Besides QSMs, pheromones (usually oligopeptides), represent another family of diffusible fungal signals. Generally, pheromones are dedicated to early mating behaviors through its complex patterns of autocrine and/or paracrine signaling. In Cryptococcus, the paracrine regulation of pheromone during bisexual mating leads to mating partner attraction, shmoo differentiation, and cell fusion [23]. The autocrine regulation of pheromone is more important for unisexual mating [23]. During both bisexual and unisexual mating, pheromone signaling creates considerable heterogeneity in morphotypes in a mating community, and some cells in the hypha morphotype further differentiate to aerial fruiting structures. The deletion of MAT2, the master regulator of the pheromone sensing and response pathway, abolishes the cell heterogeneity in the community [15,29]. Thus, sensing and production of pheromones link external stimulation with genetic programming for sexual reproduction.

In higher eukaryotes, signals that exert local activities are important for the formation of highly differentiated tissue pattern [49]. A well-studied case is extracellular matrix (ECM) signals, which play fundamental roles in regulating cell shape, motility, and tissue differentiation [49]. Two recent studies unveiled that ECM signals also exist in microbe and are involved in the control of community differentiation. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the major biofilm matrix polysaccharide Psl acts as an autoinduction signal to promote biofilm formation [50••]. In C. neoformans, we recently showed that an ECM protein Cfl1 stimulates the yeast-to-hypha transition [22••]. Extracellular Cfl1 drives the transition through its upstream regulator Znf2, forming a positive-feedback regulation that resembles the activity of an autoinducer. Accordingly, Cfl1 is highly expressed in the hyphal subpopulation located at the periphery of a mating community (Figure 2a). Unlike the aforementioned low-molecular-weight signals, Cfl1 is a protein over 20kD [22••]. Thus, it is unlikely that Cfl1 synchronizes gene expression for the whole community under most conditions. Consistent with this hypothesis, Cfl1 is concentrated in the extracellular matrix layer covering the colony surface after prolonged incubation [22••]. This suggests that Cfl1 may serve as a local signal regulating morphotype transition in the cells enclosed or adjacent to the extracellular matrix, in which Cfl1 is highly concentrated (Figure 2b) [22••].

Conclusions

In a C. neoformans community, many morphotypes co-exist. These morphotypes differ in their pathogenicity, their development competency, or their stress resistance, thereby creating a population that can potentially adapt to conditions with unpredictable changes. This heterogeneity in morphotype mirrors the regulatory complexity created by multiple communication signals with distinct regulatory patterns. Morphotype-related tradeoffs are also observed during the progression of cryptococcal infection [14,21,44], despite the fact that cryptococcal encounter with a mammalian host is purely incidental. This is consistent with the absence of Cryptococcus neoformans from human microbiota in metagenomic studies [51]. Thus, morphotype switches related to pathogenic lifestyle may well have been evolved from strategies to survive environmental conditions that mimic different host niches. This again demonstrates the importance of the “dual use” of cryptococcal social biology.

Highlights.

  • Both host and environmental signals entail cryptococcal morphotype heterogeneity.

  • Diverse morphotypes are coordinated with saprophytic and pathogenic lifestyles.

  • Morphotype heterogeneity is fine-tuned by various intercellular signals.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01AI097599 (X.L.) and R21AI107138 (X.L.), and “1000 Young Talents Program of China” (L.W.). XL holds an Investigators in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease Award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

• of special interest

•• of outstanding interest

  • 1.Brown SP, Buckling A: A social life for discerning microbes. Cell 2008, 135:600–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lidstrom ME, Konopka MC: The role of physiological heterogeneity in microbial population behavior. Nat Chem Biol 2010, 6:705–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Klein BS, Tebbets B: Dimorphism and virulence in fungi. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007, 10:314–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Maresca B, Kobayashi GS: Dimorphism in Histoplasma capsulatum: a model for the study of cell differentiation in pathogenic fungi. Microbiol Rev 1989, 53:186–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maresca B, Kobayashi GS: Dimorphism in Histoplasma capsulatum and Blastomyces dermatitidis. Contrib Microbiol 2000, 5:201–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hilbi H, Weber SS, Ragaz C, Nyfeler Y, Urwyler S: Environmental predators as models for bacterial pathogenesis. Environ Microbiol 2007, 9:563–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang L, Lin X: Morphogenesis in fungal pathogenicity: shape, size, and surface. PLoS Pathog 2012, 8:e1003027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Buchanan KL, Murphy JW: What makes Cryptococcus neoformans a pathogen? Emerg Infect Dis 1998, 4:71–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Casadevall A: Amoeba provide insight into the origin of virulence in pathogenic fungi. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012, 710:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li CH, Cervantes M, Springer DJ, Boekhout T, Ruiz-Vazquez RM, Torres-Martinez SR, Heitman J, Lee SC: Sporangiospore size dimorphism is linked to virulence of Mucor circinelloides. PLoS Pathog 2011, 7:e1002086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lin X: Cryptococcus neoformans: morphogenesis, infection, and evolution. Infect Genet Evol 2009, 9:401–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pappas PG: Cryptococcal infections in non-HIV-infected patients. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2013, 124:61–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Park BJ, Wannemuehler KA, Marston BJ, Govender N, Pappas PG, Chiller TM: Estimation of the current global burden of cryptococcal meningitis among persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS 2009, 23:525–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shi M, Li SS, Zheng C, Jones GJ, Kim KS, Zhou H, Kubes P, Mody CH: Real-time imaging of trapping and urease-dependent transmigration of Cryptococcus neoformans in mouse brain. J Clin Invest 2010, 120:1683–1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. •.Wang L, Zhai B, Lin X: The link between morphotype transition and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS Pathog 2012, 8:e1002765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This is the paper showing that hypha morphology is avirulent and Mat2 is the master regulator for shmoo morphology.
  • 16.Crabtree JN, Okagaki LH, Wiesner DL, Strain AK, Nielsen JN, Nielsen K: Titan cell production enhances the virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun 2012, 80:3776–3785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lin X, Alspaugh JA, Liu H, Harris S: Fungal Morphogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Blackstock R, Hall NK: Immunosuppression by avirulent, pseudohyphal forms of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mycopathologia 1982, 80:95–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Neilson JB, Fromtling RA, Bulmer GS: Pseudohyphal forms of Cryptococcus neoformans: decreased survival in vivo. Mycopathologia 1981, 73:57–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moore TD, Edman JC: The alpha-mating type locus of Cryptococcus neoformans contains a peptide pheromone gene. Mol Cell Biol 1993, 13:1962–1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okagaki LH, Strain AK, Nielsen JN, Charlier C, Baltes NJ, Chretien F, Heitman J, Dromer F, Nielsen K: Cryptococcal cell morphology affects host cell interactions and pathogenicity. PLoS Pathog 2010, 6:e1000953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. •.Wang L, Tian X, Gyawali R, Lin X: Fungal adhesion protein guides community behaviors and autoinduction in a paracrine manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:11571–11576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This paper reveals that ECM protein Cfl1 stimulates yeast-to-hypha transition in C. neoformans as an autoinduction signal.
  • 23.Shen WC, Davidson RC, Cox GM, Heitman J: Pheromones stimulate mating and differentiation via paracrine and autocrine signaling in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot Cell 2002, 1:366–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lin X, Hull CM, Heitman J: Sexual reproduction between partners of the same mating type in Cryptococcus neoformans. Nature 2005, 434:1017–1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. •.Wang L, Tian X, Gyawali R, Upadhyay S, Foyle D, Wang G, Cai JJ, Lin X: Morphotype transition and sexual reproduction are genetically associated in a ubiquitous environmental pathogen. PLoS Pathog 2014, 10:e1004185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This paper demonstrates that Znf2-Pum1 circuit bridges hyphal differentiation and sexual reproduction in Cryptococcus neoformans.
  • 26.Lin X, Litvintseva AP, Nielsen K, Patel S, Floyd A, Mitchell TG, Heitman J: alpha AD alpha hybrids of Cryptococcus neoformans: evidence of same-sex mating in nature and hybrid fitness. PLoS Genet 2007, 3:1975–1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tkacz JS, MacKay VL: Sexual conjugation in yeast. Cell surface changes in response to the action of mating hormones. J Cell Biol 1979, 80:326–333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McClelland CM, Chang YC, Varma A, Kwon-Chung KJ: Uniqueness of the mating system in Cryptococcus neoformans. Trends Microbiol 2004, 12:208–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lin X, Jackson JC, Feretzaki M, Xue C, Heitman J: Transcription factors Mat2 and Znf2 operate cellular circuits orchestrating opposite- and same-sex mating in Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1000953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Steenbergen JN, Shuman HA, Casadevall A: Cryptococcus neoformans interactions with amoebae suggest an explanation for its virulence and intracellular pathogenic strategy in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98:15245–15250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gancedo JM: Control of pseudohyphae formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001, 25:107–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Smith DG, Garcia-Pedrajas MD, Gold SE, Perlin MH: Isolation and characterization from pathogenic fungi of genes encoding ammonium permeases and their roles in dimorphism. Mol Microbiol 2003, 50:259–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Phadke SS, Feretzaki M, Heitman J: Unisexual reproduction enhances fungal competitiveness by promoting habitat exploration via hyphal growth and sporulation. Eukaryot Cell 2013, 12:1155–1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lin J, Idnurm A, Lin X: Morphology and its underlying genetic regulation impact the interaction between Cryptococcus neoformans and its hosts. Med Mycol 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fu J, Morris IR, Wickes BL: The production of monokaryotic hyphae by Cryptococcus neoformans can be induced by high temperature arrest of the cell cycle and is independent of same-sex mating. PLoS Pathog 2013, 9:e1003335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Velagapudi R, Hsueh YP, Geunes-Boyer S, Wright JR, Heitman J: Spores as infectious propagules of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun 2009, 77:4345–4355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fraser JA, Giles SS, Wenink EC, Geunes-Boyer SG, Wright JR, Diezmann S, Allen A, Stajich JE, Dietrich FS, Perfect JR, et al. : Same-sex mating and the origin of the Vancouver Island Cryptococcus gattii outbreak. Nature 2005, 437:1360–1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. ••.Ni M, Feretzaki M, Li W, Floyd-Averette A, Mieczkowski P, Dietrich FS, Heitman J: Unisexual and heterosexual meiotic reproduction generate aneuploidy and phenotypic diversity de novo in the yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS Biol 2013, 11:e1001653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This paper provides important genomic evidences to support that both unisexual and bisexual mating can efficiently generate genetic diversity in progenies that potentially bestows C. neoformans the resistance against antifungal.
  • 39.Fromtling RA, Blackstock R, Hall NK, Bulmer GS: Immunization of mice with an avirulent pseudohyphal form of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mycopathologia 1979, 68:179–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nadal M, Garcia-Pedrajas MD, Gold SE: Dimorphism in fungal plant pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008, 284:127–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Molero G, Diez-Orejas R, Navarro-Garcia F, Monteoliva L, Pla J, Gil C, Sanchez-Perez M, Nombela C: Candida albicans: genetics, dimorphism and pathogenicity. Int Microbiol 1998, 1:95–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gow NA, Hube B: Importance of the Candida albicans cell wall during commensalism and infection. Curr Opin Microbiol 2012, 15:406–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Botts MR, Giles SS, Gates MA, Kozel TR, Hull CM: Isolation and characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans spores reveal a critical role for capsule biosynthesis genes in spore biogenesis. Eukaryot Cell 2009, 8:595–605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zaragoza O, Garcia-Rodas R, Nosanchuk JD, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Casadevall A: Fungal cell gigantism during mammalian infection. PLoS Pathog 2010, 6:e1000945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zaragoza O, Nielsen K: Titan cells in Cryptococcus neoformans: cells with a giant impact. Curr Opin Microbiol 2013, 16:409–413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li SS, Mody CH: Cryptococcus. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2010, 7:186–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Youk H, Lim WA: Secreting and sensing the same molecule allows cells to achieve versatile social behaviors. Science 2014, 343:1242782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hornby JM, Jensen EC, Lisec AD, Tasto JJ, Jahnke B, Shoemaker R, Dussault P, Nickerson KW: Quorum sensing in the dimorphic fungus Candida albicans is mediated by farnesol. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001, 67:2982–2992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guan JL, Chen HC: Signal transduction in cell-matrix interactions. Int Rev Cytol 1996, 168:81–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. ••.Irie Y, Borlee BR, O'Connor JR, Hill PJ, Harwood CS, Wozniak DJ, Parsek MR: Self-produced exopolysaccharide is a signal that stimulates biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:20632–20636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This papers shows that an important extracellular matrix polysaccharide regulates biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa as an intercellular signal.
  • 51.Hannigan GD, Grice EA: Microbial ecology of the skin in the era of metagenomics and molecular microbiology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2013, 3:a015362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES