Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1989 Spring;22(1):9–22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-9

An evaluation of gentle teaching and visual screening in the reduction of stereotypy.

J Jordan 1, N N Singh 1, A C Repp 1
PMCID: PMC1286148  PMID: 2708176

Abstract

Gentle teaching and visual screening techniques have been used to control severe behavior problems in persons with mental retardation. An alternating treatments design was used to compare gentle teaching, visual screening, and a task-training condition in the reduction of the high-level stereotypy of 3 persons with mental retardation. Following a baseline phase, a task-training condition using standard behavioral techniques was implemented to establish the effects of training the subjects on the tasks. Results showed a modest decrease in stereotypy. This phase was followed by an alternating treatments phase in which visual screening, gentle teaching, and baseline conditions were compared. Both procedures were superior to the control condition in reducing stereotypic behavior, with visual screening being more effective than gentle teaching. When compared with data from the prior phase, gentle teaching was found to be more effective than task training for 2 subjects but less effective for the 3rd, whose stereotypy increased during gentle teaching. Two succeeding phases in which visual screening was implemented across two and then all three daily conditions reduced stereotypy further to near-zero levels. An additional phase with 1 subject demonstrated that the treatment effects of visual screening were easily replicated across therapists. Mixed and idiosyncratic changes in collateral behaviors occurred. For example, "bonding," the goal of gentle teaching, occurred at the same low levels under both treatments, contrary to the predictions of gentle teaching's proponents. The results indicate that gentle teaching may not be the universal treatment of choice for stereotypy its proponents suggest, and that it requires further empirical evaluation.

Full text

PDF
9

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow D. H., Hayes S. C. Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):199–210. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett R. P., Matson J. L., Shapiro E. S., Ollendick T. H. A comparison of punishment and DRO procedures for treating stereotypic behavior of mentally retarded children. Appl Res Ment Retard. 1981;2(3):247–256. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(81)90018-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cronin K. A., Cuvo A. J. Teaching mending skills to mentally retarded adolescents. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Fall;12(3):401–406. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gold M. W. Stimulus factors in skill training of retarded adolescents on a complex assembly task: acquisition, transfer, and retention. Am J Ment Defic. 1972 Mar;76(5):517–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris S. L., Wolchik S. A. Suppression of self-stimulation: three alternative strategies. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):185–198. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Koegel R. L., Covert A. The relationship of self-stimulation to learning in autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Winter;5(4):381–387. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koegel R. L., Firestone P. B., Kramme K. W., Dunlap G. Increasing spontaneous play by suppressing self-stimulation in autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):521–528. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LaGrow S. J., Repp A. C. Stereotypic responding: a review of intervention research. Am J Ment Defic. 1984 May;88(6):595–609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewis M. H., Baumeister A. A., Mailman R. B. A neurobiological alternative to the perceptual reinforcement hypothesis of stereotyped behavior: a commentary on "Self-stimulatory behavior and perceptual reinforcement". J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Fall;20(3):253–258. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lovaas I., Newsom C., Hickman C. Self-stimulatory behavior and perceptual reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;20(1):45–68. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McGonigle J. J., Duncan D., Cordisco L., Barrett R. P. Visual screening: an alternative method for reducing stereotypic behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Fall;15(3):461–467. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKeegan G. F., Estill K., Campbell B. M. Use of nonexclusionary timeout for the elimination of a stereotyped behavior. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1984 Sep;15(3):261–264. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(84)90035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Murphy G., Carr J., Callias M. Increasing simple toy play in profoundly mentally handicapped children: II. Designing special toys. J Autism Dev Disord. 1986 Mar;16(1):45–58. doi: 10.1007/BF01531577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reid D. H., Parsons M. B., McCarn J. E., Green C. W., Phillips J. F., Schepis M. M. Providing a more appropriate education for severely handicapped persons: increasing and validating functional classroom tasks. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Winter;18(4):289–301. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Singh N. N. Behavioural dimensions of the de Lange syndrome: attribution of mystique and a question of cause and effect. J Ment Defic Res. 1983 Sep;27(Pt 3):237–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1983.tb00295.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Singh N. N., Millichamp C. J. Independent and social play among profoundly mentally retarded adults: training, maintenance, generalization, and long-term follow-up. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;20(1):23–34. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stokes T. F., Baer D. M. An implicit technology of generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Summer;10(2):349–367. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weeks M., Gaylord-Ross R. Task difficulty and aberrant behavior in severely handicapped students. J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Winter;14(4):449–463. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES