Abstract
The representativeness of behavioral observation samples with durations of less than the whole time of interest was investigated. A real-time recording system was developed to quantify the behavior of 5 profoundly mentally retarded physically handicapped adult students in an institutional training setting. Behavior was observed using six mutually exclusive and exhaustive categories during 2.5-hr observation sessions. Sample observation sessions with durations ranging from 15 to 135 min were computer simulated from the whole-session (150-min) records. It was found that the representativeness of these samples, when compared to whole-session records, was a function of the relative duration of the behavioral categories and of sample duration. The occurrence of relatively high-duration behaviors (lasting for more than 50% of the session) was estimated to within 20% error by samples of less than 60 min, but low-duration behaviors (1 to 3% of the session) were inadequately quantified even from 135-min samples. Increasing irregularity of bouts of behavior in the low-duration behaviors is suggested as the cause of the functions obtained. Implications of the findings for applied behavior analysis are discussed, with the recommendation that the adequacy of observational session durations be empirically assessed routinely.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alevizos P., DeRisi W., Liberman R., Eckman T., Callahan E. The Behavior Observation Instrument: a method of direct observation for program evaluation. J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Summer;11(2):243–257. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227–267. doi: 10.1163/156853974x00534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boykin R. A., Nelson R. O. The effects of instructions and calculation procedures on observers' accuracy, agreement, and calculation correctness. J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Winter;14(4):479–489. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrop A., Daniels M. Methods of time sampling: A reappraisal of momentary time sampling and partial interval recording. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Spring;19(1):73–77. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kazdin A. E. Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: the ABCs of reliability. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):141–150. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Odom S. L., Hoyson M., Jamieson B., Strain P. S. Increasing handicapped preschoolers' peer social interactions: cross-setting and component analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Spring;18(1):3–16. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Reid D. H., Parsons M. B., McCarn J. E., Green C. W., Phillips J. F., Schepis M. M. Providing a more appropriate education for severely handicapped persons: increasing and validating functional classroom tasks. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Winter;18(4):289–301. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Repp A. C., Roberts D. M., Slack D. J., Repp C. F., Berkler M. S. A comparison of frequency, interval, and time-sampling methods of data collection. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 WINTER;9(4):501–508. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanson-Fisher R. W., Poole A. D., Dunn J. An empirical method for determining an appropriate interval length for recording behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Fall;13(3):493–500. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]