Skip to main content
Frontiers in Public Health logoLink to Frontiers in Public Health
. 2026 Jan 20;13:1735577. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1735577

The problem of frailty caused by acute infection and future health management strategies to improve frailty

Guihua Li 1,, Yue Zhao 1,, Wenhui Gu 1,2, Qianqian Wang 1, Xinyi Lu 3, Xinlei Miao 1,4,5,*
PMCID: PMC12864481  PMID: 41641052

Abstract

Background

We aimed to analyze changes in frailty associated with long-COVID, while providing effective health management measures to improve frailty.

Methods

We conducted a 4-month follow-up cohort study involving 2,471 participants to analyze changes in body frailty after the prevalence of COVID-19 in China. We performed interrupted time series analysis to estimate the impact of acute infection on the changes in frailty. The time-dependent COX model was considered to assess the association between frailty status and infection, and sensitivity analysis was performed to verify the stability of the results. In addition, we established a traditional Cox model to analyze the relationship between healthy behaviors and infections, aiming to improve health management and reduce frailty.

Results

There were significantly elevated trend changes in the frailty index compared to the prepandemic period in the total population (+0.029[0.016, 0.041], p < 0.001), and the frailty index was found to be higher in female individuals and people aged over 65 years. Participants with moderate frailty (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04–1.35, p < 0.001) and severe frailty (HR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.15–1.56, p < 0.001) had a significantly higher hazard of infection than those with mild frailty. Long-term health monitoring indicated that positive mood, appropriate physical activities, sufficient intake of grains and vegetables, and reduced intake of sugary drinks can improve frailty and ultimately reduce the risk of infection.

Conclusion

In this study, it was found that the population generally became more frail after the pandemic, and frailty increases the risk of acute reinfection. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out health management strategies to improve frailty.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic, frailty, health improvement, health management, interrupted time series

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019, commonly referred to as COVID-19, first emerged in 2019 and has persisted for nearly 3 years, resulting in a global pandemic. On 5 May 2023, the World Health Organization declared an end to the public health emergency of international concern (1). However, this does not imply that acute conditions are no longer a threat to population health. Some studies have confirmed that the majority of infected people develop mild to moderate illness and recover without requiring hospitalization. Typically, recovery occurs gradually after 1 week or may even take up to 14 days (2–4). After the acute infection, a proportion of people experience physical symptoms, such as cough, fatigue, or poor sleep quality. Unfortunately, these symptoms can persist (5, 6) and are often known as post-acute syndrome (PCS) or long-COVID (5).

Recently, frailty has gained attention in the field of health management. Frailty is an age-related clinical condition characterized by a decline in physical and physiological functions (6). The literature suggests that frailty is closely related to chronic inflammation and insulin resistance, thereby accelerating the occurrence of cardiovascular and other diseases (7). Furthermore, another mechanism identified is the association between hypoglycemia and frailty, which can increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases (8). In summary, previous studies have found that acute infection may have an impact on physical functions such as pulmonary, neuropsychiatric, and cardiovascular health, particularly among older people. However, there is still limited evidence on the relationship between frailty and long-COVID due to the complexities surrounding frailty. Therefore, detailed information about frailty in the general population after acute infection is necessary to inform future health management strategies.

We aimed to analyze changes in frailty before and after the acute infection and to identify health management measures for addressing frailty in the future.

Materials and methods

Study design

In this study, pandemic refers to COVID-19, which is defined as an acute infection, that is, the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Based on the COVID-19 study, an add-on study to the Dalina Health Management Cohort (DHMC) (ChiCTR2300073363) observed the health status after infection of the health examination population in the northeast of China. DHMC is an open cohort study established by personal physical examination of the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University in China, which is a longitudinal survey launched in 2014. DHMC was designed to collect the results of personal physical examination included laboratory test results (biochemical examination), auxiliary examinations (ultrasonic testing, etc.), health questionnaire (demographic variables, lifestyles, disease history, medication history, nutritional status, psychological situation), and evaluate population health status, and then conduct health management.

We included all individuals (aged ≥18 years) who underwent two health assessments. The first assessment was conducted at some point during the year 2022. The second assessment took place between 1 January and 30 April 2023. Therefore, the approximate interval between the first and second assessments for any given participant ranged from approximately 9 to 16 months, with a typical interval of approximately 1 year. We only included individuals who completed both assessments. We excluded 1,321 individuals with incomplete information and ultimately included 2,471 participants (43.10% female) in a self-control study on the changes in physical health before and after COVID-19 infection. Analyses were performed using the entire data set (N = 2,471) and one subset (N1 = 2,264, who were infected after 1 December 2022, and had undergone physical examination). The flowchart is shown in Supplementary Figure S1. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the health management cohort study and its add-on study were approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University. This study has informed consent obtained from all participants.

·

Frailty and outcome measures

This study updated the components of frailty by combining Fried, Rockwood, and Mitnitski (9–11). We used a combination of self-reported health and routine examination results to measure the frailty index (FI) in order to estimate frailty. FI is a comprehensive indicator that integrates information from biomarkers, medical history, living habits, etc. In our study, FI was measured for each participant separately using 54 items, 14 categories (Supplementary Table S1) in each medical examination year. Each item in each category is defined as a binary classification variable according to the diagnostic criteria (12). The score of the sum of the items in each category≥1 is defined as a new binary classification variable indicating having a health deficit; otherwise, there is no health defect. For each participant, FI is calculated as the proportion of health attributes that a person has in a deficit state, ranging from 0 (no health deficit) to 1 (health deficit). Finally, we divided the degree of frailty according to the tri-sectional quantiles of FI, namely mild frailty, moderate frailty, and severe frailty. We defined acute infection as the outcome based on the questionnaire “whether you have confirmed COVID-19 infection through antigen self-test or nucleic acid test recently” reported by the participants during physical examination.

Covariates definition

All variables were defined as binary classification variables. Smoking and alcohol consumption were categorized as yes (having related experience) or no (not having related experience). Metabolic equivalent (MET) was calculated from the relevant physical activity types and time reported by participants, and MET ≤ 3 was defined as low physical activity, MET > 3 and ≤ 6 was defined as moderate physical activity, MET > 6 was defined as vigorous physical activity. (13). We defined individuals under the age of 60 who sleep for more than 7 h and those over 60 years who sleep for between 5 and 8 h as normal sleep (14). Having good tooth brushing habits means brushing teeth twice or more a day. The dietary nutrition standards are evaluated according to the provisions of the Chinese Dietary Guidelines 2022 (15), which include a comprehensive evaluation of 24 h of grains, meat, eggs, aquatic products, tubers, vegetables, fruits, nuts, soy products, white water, and milk. The evaluation criteria are the same as the rules for calculating FI, and ultimately, the population that meets dietary standards is considered to have a dietary score of 0. The drinking amount of tea is defined as 2–3cups per day as mild intake, 4–5 cups as moderate intake, 6–8 cups as excessive intake, and more than 8 cups as severe intake, based on the reference of less than one cup (250 mL) per day. The soda water is defined as no intake per week, 1–5 cups per week, 6–9 cups per week, and more than 10 cups per week as reference, mild intake, moderate intake, and excessive intake, respectively. Compared to not drinking coffee, we defined 1–2 cups per week as mild intake, 3–5cups per week as moderate intake, and more than 5 cups as excessive intake. Mild intake of sugar-sweetened beverages was defined as 1–2 bottles per week, 3–4 bottles of sugar-sweetened beverages as moderate intake, and more than 4 bottles per week as excessive intake. There were 11 items about psychological stress for the subjects, and those with a total score of 0 were defined as optimistic about psychological stress. We defined nodules of BI-RADS 3 and above in thyroid ultrasound and C-TI-RADS 3 and above in breast ultrasound as having nodules. Ultrasound diagnosis of any degree of fatty liver was defined as having fatty liver. Pulmonary nodules and lung inflammation were defined through the diagnosis of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Cervical vascular abnormalities are defined as the phenomenon of plaques, narrowing, and thickening of the intima media in cervical blood vessels. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated by the ratio of weight (kg) and the square of height (m2), and a BMI between 18.5 kg/m2 and 24 kg/m2 is considered normal. The definition of having a family history, personal history, and medication history was that the participant had any related historical event.

Statistics

We preliminarily described the characteristics of the data, which included continuous normal variables summarized by means and SDs, and medians and IQRs for continuous non-normal variables. Differences in baseline characteristics between groups were compared using independent samples t-tests or Mann–Whitney U-tests for continuous variables (as appropriate based on distribution), and chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables.

We used the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the uninfected rate of COVID-19 and used the log-rank test to compare the rates by the degree of frailty. The Cox proportional hazards model (Cox PH) was tested using the cox.zph function in the R Survival package. We adjusted three models of the Cox PH to assess the association between frailty status and infection. Analyses were conducted stratified by frailty category. Within each stratum, regression was used to assess the association of health behaviors with the likelihood of frailty, using the favorable level of each behavior as the reference. Frailty status was considered to have a divergent association with outcomes if they were significantly associated with COVID-19 infection, but the log2 hazard ratios had opposite signs. For the variables in the model that failed the assumption for a Cox PH model (p < 0.05), a time-dependent COX model was considered (as detailed in Supplementary Figure S2). We use the tt parameter and the log conversion to construct the interaction term of the variables that time transform in order to solve the problem of coefficients changing over time. The model is specified as:

tt=function(x,t,)xlog(t+20)

where x is the covariate with time-varying effects, and t is the analysis time.

Subsequently, we still established three traditional Cox regression models to analyze the association between frailty and health behaviors. The first model was a crude model with unadjusted. The minimal adjusted model was adjusted sex and age. The last model was adjusted for vaccination based on the minimal model.

We performed an interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) to estimate the impact of COVID-19 infection on the change in frailty. ITSA is a common method in public health, which tests the effectiveness of an intervention by controlling the upward or downward trend of outcome variables before intervention, including changes in levels and trends before and after interruption. First, we used least squares estimation for the Breusch–Godfrey test of independent variables and hysteresis residuals. Second, we used segmented regression to establish a model to fit the impact of a sudden COVID-19 incident on frailty. We compare outcomes before and after a policy intervention using two time points. The model is specified as:

Yt=β0+β1time+β2intervention+β3post

Yt is the value of FI in time t; time is a continuous variable indicating the time span, where the first observation (2022.1.1) was defined 0, and the last observation (2023.4.31) was defined as 2,471; intervention is a binary variable indicating whether the participant was infected; post is a continuous number beginning with 0 after the infection on 1 January 2023. β0 estimates the FI at the beginning of the time series. β1 estimates the preinfection trend of FI. β2 estimates the immediate change in the level of FI after infection. β3 estimates the trend of FI after infection.

A sensitivity analysis was conducted using a segment time-dependent Cox model. We use a hierarchical function for time and divide it into two periods based on the proportional risk assumption graph: 0–14 days and after 14 days. Then we fit and explore the impact of frailty on the occurrence of COVID-19 infection based on the inflection point.

All statistics and data analysis were performed in Stata SE15 and R 4.3.0. Estimated effects with 95% CIs were calculated, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline information

The baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. A total of 793 female participants and 743 male participants were acute positive. Compared to an uninfected female, an infected female tends to be younger, more alcohol consumption, have a worse psychological status, have a family medical history, have higher FI, and be of moderate or severe frailty status (p < 0.05). Compared to an uninfected male, an infected male tends to be younger, non-smoking, non-alcohol consumption, poor sleeping, and have a poor psychological status, having a personal and family medical history, higher FI, and being of moderate or severe frailty status (p < 0.05).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the participants (N = 2,471).

Variables Female (n = 1,065) Male (n = 1,406)
Infected (n = 793) Uninfected (n = 272) P-value Infected (n = 743) Uninfected (n = 663) P-value
Age (year) <0.001 <0.001
 18–44 539(68.00%) 144(52.90%) 362(48.70%) 247(37.30%)
 45–64 234(29.50%) 93(34.20%) 358(48.20%) 377(56.90%)
 65 and above 20(2.50%) 35(12.90%) 23(3.10%) 39(5.90%)
Smoking 7(0.90%) 3(1.10%) 0.745 355(47.80%) 356(53.70%) 0.027
Alcohol consumption 141(17.80%) 32(11.80%) 0.02 515(69.30%) 384(57.90%) <0.001
Sleeping 164(20.90%) 41(15.80%) 0.069 127(17.30%) 78(12.10%) 0.007
Physical activity 44(5.60%) 18(6.70%) 0.508 36(4.90%) 19(2.90%) 0.057
Diet 413(52.10%) 141(51.80%) 0.945 401(54.00%) 384(57.90%) 0.137
Tooth brushing 96(12.10%) 44(16.20%) 0.086 291(39.20%) 261(39.40%) 0.939
Psychological status 568(71.60%) 165(60.70%) 0.001 468(63.00%) 341(51.40%) <0.001
Frailty index 0.30 ± 0.09 0.29 ± 0.09 0.006 0.37 ± 0.10 0.36 ± 0.09 0.002
Frailty status 0.005 0.004
 Mild frailty 373(47.04%) 159(58.46%) 143(19.25%) 174(26.25%)
 Moderate frailty 311(39.22%) 83(30.51%) 298(40.11%) 258(38.91%)
 Severe frailty 109(13.74) 30(11.03%) 302(40.64%) 231(34.84%)

Bold font indicates statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

The changes in FI before and after acute infection

A significant increasing trend in the frailty index (FI) was observed in the overall population following acute infection, with a mean change of +0.029 (95% CI: 0.016, 0.041; p < 0.001). At baseline, males exhibited a higher FI (0.369) than females (0.320). However, following infection, the immediate increase in FI was more pronounced in females (+0.053; 95% CI: 0.035, 0.070; p < 0.001) than in males (+0.032; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.049; p < 0.001). The most marked instantaneous change in FI was observed among individuals aged 45 to 65 years. The details about the change in the frailty index of the population before and after the pandemic are shown in Figure 1. Subgroup analysis based on infection status revealed that individuals who experienced an acute infection had a slower immediate change ( β2 ) in FI (0.028; 95% CI: 0.013, 0.043; p < 0.05) compared to those who were not infected. This difference was particularly evident among adults aged over 65 years. A detailed comparison of FI changes between infected and uninfected individuals is provided in Supplementary Table S2. Furthermore, analysis of the compositional changes in the frailty index indicated that 20 biomarkers exhibited significant immediate alterations after infection in the overall population. Additional details are available in the Supplementary Figures S3–S8; Supplementary Tables S3–S6.

Figure 1.

Line plots labeled A to F show the frailty index before and after an infection event, indicated by a vertical dashed line. The data includes actual values as green lines and predicted values as orange lines. Statistical significance is annotated with P-values above each plot. Plot A through F displays variations in data behavior prior to and following the infection marker.

Changes in the frailty index before and after infection. Panels (A–C) depict the changes in the total population, males, and females, respectively, while panels (D–F) show the changes in the under-45, 45–64, and over-65 age groups.

The association between FI status and acute infection

Table 2 shows that moderate frailty participants and severe frailty participants had a significantly higher hazard of infection than the mild frailty participants in the adjusted model; the HR was 1.19 (95% CI: 1.04–1.35) and 1.34(95%CI: 1.15–1.56). The results did not change after using the segment time-dependent Cox model for sensitivity analysis.

Table 2.

Association between FI status and acute infection.

Frailty Time dependent cox Sensitive analysis
Crude model Minimal adjusted model Adjusted model Crude model Minimal adjusted model Adjusted model
Mild frailty Ref ref ref ref ref ref
Moderate frailty 1.05 (0.93, 1.20) 1.20 (1.06, 1.36)* 1.19 (1.04, 1.35)* 1.05 (0.93, 1.20) 1.21 (1.06, 1.37)* 1.20 (1.05, 1.36)*
Severe frailty 0.97 (0.85, 1.12) 1.34 (1.15, 1.55)* 1.34 (1.15, 1.56)* 0.97 (0.85,1.12) 1.35 (1.16, 1.57)* 1.35 (1.16, 1.57)*

* means p-value <0.05. A crude model had not been adjusted. A minimal adjusted model for age and sex. Adjusted model for age, sex, and number of vaccinations. The association between sex and infection in the second time period (after 14 days): HR = 0.45(95%CI: 0.34–0.58, p < 0.001).

The association between healthy behavior and frailty status

The improvement of different health behaviors varied in different frailty statuses after adjusting for age, gender, and vaccination (Figure 2). In mild frailty, the HR of 1.49 (95% CI = 1.11, 2.01) and 1.47 (1.14, 1.89) for participants with poor sleep quality and higher psychological scores. Among moderate frailty, grains and vegetables can reduce the risk of disease by approximately 70% when they meet the standard. The higher psychological score increases the risk of infection by 38% (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.86). People in severe frailty engaging in excessive physical activities actually increase infection risk by 38% (HR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.86). It is worth noting that regardless of the degree of frailty, smoking can reduce the risk of infection by more than 30%. Meanwhile, sugary drinks increase the risk of infection by 20–90%.

Figure 2.

Forest plot showing hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals for various lifestyle factors across mild, moderate, and severe frailty. Each factor, such as smoking, drinking, and dietary intake, is compared, with HR values and p-values indicating statistical significance. Blue squares represent HR for each factor, with lines showing confidence intervals. Factors like smoking and excessive pressure show significant results across frailty categories. A red arrow points towards higher HR values, indicating increased risk with certain behaviors.

Association between healthy behavior and frailty status.

Discussion

We conducted a 4-month follow-up study on 2,471 participants to analyze the changes in frailty after the prevalence of acute infection in December 2022 in China, confirming that acute infection will have a long-term impact on the population. The study found that people became frail after acute infection, while female individuals and people over the age of 65 years continued to be weak for a longer time. When the population is generally infected, there are instantaneous changes in various serum indicators in the body, and these positive results have not recovered for at least 4 months, which poses a risk of recurrent infection, so it is necessary for the population to promptly improve their frailty. The future health management of correct healthy behaviors, such as maintaining a positive mood, engaging in regular physical activity, ensuring adequate intake of whole grains and vegetables, and reducing the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, could reduce the risk of infection.

Since the epidemic of acute infection, people have faced its health effects to varying degrees, and one of those is called frailty, which generally occurs before or coexists with disease (16, 17). Even in dynamic and updating research, the core elements of frailty are still recognized to include both physiological and psychological. The relationship between acute infection and frailty status is poorly understood, while our results provide evidence that the risk of acute infection increases with the degree of frailty, after adjusting for confounding factors, and the risk of infection caused by severe frailty is 1.35 times higher than mild frailty.

Frailty no longer only exists in older people but also in various age groups. Despite the unknown global prevalence of frailty, it is higher in women than men and rises with age, as observed in many studies (18, 19), and a similar sex-specific trend has been confirmed in pre-frail older people (20). This is similar to our research results, where we found that the frailty index of females is significantly higher than that of males, and this phenomenon still exists in long-term care for at least 4 months after infection, especially in 65 + elders. It was found that although the lifespan of the population has been extended, the overall years of disability have significantly increased in the study of healthy life expectancy (21). Females have lower mortality rates than males, while their unhealthy years are also higher, which may explain that females may have more frailty than males and even be more susceptible to infection after 14 days of acute infection. The studies also indicated that differences in physiological structure, hormone secretion, immune cells, social behaviors, and roles can all lead to females being frailer than males of the same age (18, 22, 23). An acute infection can induce local inflammation, and studies have shown that changes in immune cells can explain the increased neutrophil ratio and decreased lymphopenia in patients (19, 24). Our results also confirmed that the population undergoes changes in lymphocytes and neutrophils when facing acute infection, and this change still exists in the long-term recovery, especially in women, which can result in a slower recovery of the female immune system and lead to further frailty. This all suggests the need for long-term health management, especially for females, to respond to frailty changes.

Recent research results also indicate that healthy behaviors are closely related to improving the inflammatory environment in the body, including personal habits and diets (25). The results of this study found that poor sleep quality and high psychological scores, excessive physical activities, and any level of sugary drinks intake increase the risk of infection, and the standard level of grains and vegetables intake can reduce the risk of disease by approximately 70%. In this study, a higher intake of sugar-sweetened beverages was associated with an increased risk of frailty, suggesting that reducing their consumption may be advisable. Adequate consumption of protein and a good dietary pattern are considered to control inflammation and be beneficial for health (26, 27). Physical activities impact all immune cells and reduce systemic inflammation (28), and our study suggested that people undergo moderate physical activities, which is similar to some studies. In addition to improvements in lifestyle and dietary patterns, the immune system and inflammation are currently accepted as contributors to brain-related diseases, and an optimal psychological state is also essential (29) that why we also found that people with psychological health issues were also more susceptible to infection. Therefore, timely long-term health management is likely to be needed to carry out these healthy behaviors.

It was worth noting that our findings found smoking was a protective factor against pandemic infections. In animal experiments, nicotine may have an anti-inflammatory effect to reduce tissue injury in the initial stages of infection (30, 31). A study from Italy found that the risk of acute infection among former smokers was lower than that of non-smokers (32). Numerous studies have shown the harm of smoking to physical health, such as the risk of respiratory infections and various other diseases. Of course, this result may also be related to the healthy smoker effect, differences in health-seeking behavior, or residual confounding. However, there is insufficient epidemiological evidence at present to support that nicotine in cigarettes might be beneficial to protect people from acute infection. It is conflicting whether smoking causes acute infection, but there is no doubt that smoking is harmful to health. Therefore, it is necessary to further determine how tobacco products affect susceptibility to infection, and it needs to increase the evaluation of the impact of tobacco on population health in long-term health recovery.

This study supplements the evidence on the association between frailty and acute infection, and also emphasizes that people need to carry out appropriate health management to achieve the goal of health recovery in the long-term recovery after infection. While it also has some limitations. First of all, our results may underestimate the relationship between the variable factors and acute infection because of their interactions. Second, there is still controversy regarding the definition of frailty. Therefore, there may be biases in quantifying frailty. Then, our study used interrupted time series, but only used two changes before and after. While this analysis can assess a change in outcome level, it cannot independently evaluate changes in pre-existing trends, which is a standard strength of multi-point ITSA. Finally, this article mainly targets the physical examination population, and further verification is still needed among the large-sample population.

Conclusion

Frailty will increase the risk of acute infection, and people who have not recovered for at least 4 months after the widespread infection, especially females and older population. In the face of a long-term pandemic, people need to increase their own health management, with good mood, appropriate physical activities, sufficient intake of grains and vegetables, and reduced intake of sugary drinks playing a positive role in improving frailty and repeated infection, as well as increasing health benefits.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was funded by the Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant Number: 2025-BS-0668), Dalian Medical Science (Grant Number: 2322001), Dalian Science and Technology Talent Innovation Project (Grant Number:2024RQ059), Dalian Life and Health Sector Guidance Program (Grant Number: 2024ZDJH01PT133), and 1+X Program for Large Cohort Study-Clinical Research Incubation Project (Grant Number: YXJS2024006).

Footnotes

Edited by: Jorge Vasconez-Gonzalez, University of the Americas, Ecuador

Reviewed by: Qi Zhou, Peking University, China

Siddhartha Saha, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Research Centers, United States

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University (reference number 2022DXDL01). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

GL: Writing – original draft. YZ: Writing – original draft, Data curation. WG: Writing – original draft, Data curation. QW: Writing – original draft, Data curation. XL: Writing – original draft, Data curation. XM: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1735577/full#supplementary-material

Data_Sheet_1.docx (5.6MB, docx)

References

  • 1.WHO (2023) WHO director-general's opening remarks at the media briefing. Geneva: WHO [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ballering AV, Oertelt-Prigione S, Olde Hartman TC, JGM R. Sex and gender-related differences in COVID-19 diagnoses and SARS-CoV-2 testing practices during the first wave of the pandemic: the Dutch lifelines COVID-19 cohort study. J Womens Health. (2021) 30:1686–92. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0226, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nasserie T, Hittle M, Goodman SN. Assessment of the frequency and variety of persistent symptoms among patients with COVID-19: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. (2021) 4:e2111417. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11417, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.WHO . Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) (2023). Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_3 (Accessed August 18, 2025).
  • 5.Datta SD, Talwar A, Lee JT. A proposed framework and timeline of the spectrum of disease due to SARS-CoV-2 infection illness beyond acute infection and public health implications. JAMA. (2020) 324:2251. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22717, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwee D, Habbig AK, Scafoglieri A, Jansen B, et al. Frailty and the prediction of negative health outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. (2016) 17:27886869: 1163.e1–1163.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen LK, Chen YM, Lin MH, Peng LN, Hwang SJ. Care of elderly patients with diabetes mellitus: a focus on frailty. Ageing Res Rev. (2010) 9:S18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.08.008, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johnston SS, Conner C, Aagren M, Smith DM, Bouchard J, Brett J. Evidence linking hypoglycemic events to an increased risk of acute cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2011) 34:1164–70. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1915, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2001) 56:M146–57. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Puts MT, Toubasi S, Atkinson E, Ayala AP, Andrew M, Ashe MC, et al. Interventions to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a protocol for a scoping review of the literature and international policies. BMJ Open. (2016) 6:e010959. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010959, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. ScientificWorldJournal. (2001) 1:323–36. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2001.58, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wan X, Lu X, Liu C, Hu S, Yang J, H Z. Diagnostics. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House; (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. (2020) 54:33239350: 1451–62. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Watson NF, Badr MS, Belenky G, Bliwise DL, Buxton OM, Buysse D, et al. Recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult: a joint consensus statement of the American Academy of sleep medicine and Sleep Research Society. Sleep. (2015) 38:843–4. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4716, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chinese Nutrition Society . Dietary guidelines for Chinese residents. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House; (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Junius-Walker U, Onder G, Soleymani D, Wiese B, Albaina O, Bernabei R, et al. The essence of frailty: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis on frailty concepts and definitions. Eur J Intern Med. (2018) 56:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.04.023, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haran JP, McCormick BA. Aging, frailty, and the microbiome-how Dysbiosis influences human aging and disease. Gastroenterology. (2021) 160:507–23. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.060, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators . Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. (2020) 396:1204–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clemente-Suarez VJ, Bustamante-Sanchez A, Tornero-Aguilera JF, Ruisoto P, Mielgo-Ayuso J. Inflammation in COVID-19 and the effects of non-pharmacological interventions during the pandemic: a review. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:584. doi: 10.3390/ijms232415584, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.O'Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O'Donovan MR, Molloy DW, Clegg A, Rockwood K, et al. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing. (2021) 50:96–104. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa219, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.GBD 2019 Demographics Collaborators . Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950-2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. (2020) 396:1160–203. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30977-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gordon EH, Hubbard RE. Differences in frailty in older men and women. Med J Aust. (2020) 212:183–8. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50466, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ford AH, Hankey GJ, Yeap BB, Golledge J, Flicker L, Almeida OP. Hearing loss and the risk of dementia in later life. Maturitas. (2018) 112:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.03.004, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:1708–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Calabrese FM, Genchi VA, Serale N, Celano G, Vacca M, Palma G, et al. Gut microbiota and fecal volatilome profile inspection in metabolically healthy and unhealthy obesity phenotypes. J Endocrinol Investig. (2024) 47:3077–90. doi: 10.1007/s40618-024-02379-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rodriguez-Besteiro S, Valencia-Zapata G, de la Rosa EB, Clemente-Suárez VJ. Food consumption and COVID-19 risk perception of university students. Sustain Basel. (2022) 14:1625. doi: 10.3390/su14031625 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Richardson DP, Lovegrove JA. Nutritional status of micronutrients as a possible and modifiable risk factor for COVID-19: a UK perspective. Brit J Nutr. (2021) 125:678–84. doi: 10.1017/S000711452000330X, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alkhatib A. Antiviral functional foods and exercise lifestyle prevention of coronavirus. Nutrients. (2020) 12:633. doi: 10.3390/nu12092633, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Miller AH, Maletic V, Raison CL. Inflammation and its discontents: the role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression. Biol Psychiatry. (2009) 65:732–41. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.11.029, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mabley J, Gordon S, Pacher P. Nicotine exerts an anti-inflammatory effect in a murine model of acute lung injury. Inflammation. (2011) 34:231–7. doi: 10.1007/s10753-010-9228-x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Benowitz NL, Goniewicz ML, Halpern-Felsher B, Krishnan-Sarin S, Ling PM, O'Connor RJ, et al. Tobacco product use and the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19: current understanding and recommendations for future research. Lancet Respir Med. (2022) 10:900–15. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00182-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Colaneri M, Novelli V, Cutti S, Muzzi A, Resani G, Monti MC, et al. The experience of the health care workers of a severely hit SARS-CoV-2 referral Hospital in Italy: incidence, clinical course and modifiable risk factors for COVID-19 infection. J Public Health (Oxf). (2021) 43:26–34. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa195, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data_Sheet_1.docx (5.6MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Public Health are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES