Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
. 2026 Jan 20;15:1721174. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1721174

Drug-resistant genes, virulence characteristics, and molecular typing of clindamycin-resistant Streptococcus agalactiae in late pregnancy

Meng Yu 1, Ting Yu 1, Shui Yu 2, Li Li 1, Shuang Chen 1, Yujie Wang 1,*, Kun Wang 3,*
PMCID: PMC12864485  PMID: 41641354

Abstract

Background

Streptococcus agalactiae increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal infections. Clindamycin is a key alternative for intrapartum prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic women, but the prevalence of clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae is increasing, posing a significant clinical challenge.

Methods

A total of 178 strains isolated from tertiary hospitals in Jinan and Qingdao, Shandong Province, China, were characterized using antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing, multilocus sequence typing, serotyping, and analysis of resistance and virulence genes.

Results

All strains were susceptible to penicillin, ampicillin, linezolid, vancomycin, and tigecycline. In contrast, resistance rates to erythromycin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline were 95.5%, 60.1%, and 56.7%, respectively. Six serotypes and 15 sequence types belonging to eight clonal complexes were identified. Notable regional differences were observed. The Ib-ST10-CC12 lineage dominated in Jinan, whereas V-ST529-CC327 was predominant in Qingdao. The resistance gene mreA was ubiquitous (100%), followed by ermB (80.3%). The key virulence genes cylE, hylB, and pavA, were detected in all strains. fbsA (99.4%), the alpha protein family (98.9%), cfb (98.3%), the Pilus Island gene cluster (94.9%), and lmb (92.7%) were also highly prevalent. The two major clindamycin resistance genes, erm and lnuB, exhibited distinctly different enrichment patterns among S. agalactiae clonal complexes, despite a certain overlap in CC19 and CC327. Specifically, erm was significantly enriched in CC12 (serotype Ib), CC19 (III/V), and CC327 (III/V). In contrast, lnuB was predominantly restricted to CC19 and CC327, where it defined a unique phylogenetic subcluster. Significant differences in resistance and virulence gene profiles were observed across different clonal complexes.

Conclusion

Clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae in late-pregnancy women in Shandong Province, China exhibits a broad resistance spectrum, diverse molecular types, and significant regional heterogeneity. These findings underscore the need for continued surveillance and region-specific strategies for preventing neonatal S. agalactiae infections.

Keywords: drug resistance, molecular typing, pregnant women, Streptococcus agalactiae, virulence genes

1. Introduction

S. agalactiae is a significant cause of perinatal infections and poses enormous challenges to global public health owing to its epidemiological characteristics and the evolution of drug resistance. Epidemiological data indicate that S. agalactiae colonization rates in the genital tract of women in late pregnancy reach 10%–30% (Russell et al., 2017).It is the primary pathogen that causes early onset neonatal invasive disease, including sepsis and meningitis, with an incidence ranging from 0.55 to 2.59 cases per 1000 live births (Absalon et al., 2021). S. agalactiae infection is closely associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as chorioamnionitis and preterm birth (Gaddy et al., 2024). Currently, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and international guidelines recommend penicillin-based antibiotics for pregnant women with S. agalactiae colonization during labor to prevent infection; clindamycin or erythromycin is commonly used as an alternative treatment (Cagno et al., 2012). However, widespread antibiotic use has led to increasing S. agalactiae resistance, particularly to erythromycin and clindamycin, which poses significant challenges for clinical prevention and treatment.

The pathogenicity of S. agalactiae is associated with its molecular characteristics. Globally, serotypes la, lb, III, and V are the predominant circulating types (Nanduri et al., 2019), with serotype III strains associated with over 60% of neonatal meningitis cases (Wang et al., 2023). Molecular mechanism studies have indicated that these highly pathogenic strains typically harbor adhesion- and invasion-related genes, such as lmb and scpB (Li et al., 2025), along with HvgA, a signature virulence factor of the highly virulent clonal complex 17 (CC17) (Aznar et al., 2024). Virulence genes exhibit distinct clonal specificities. CC17 accumulates HvgA and the Pl-2b virulence island (Almeida et al., 2017), whereas CC19 tends to carry the Pl-1 virulence island (Nie et al., 2018). Furthermore, virulence factors, such as the fibrinogen-binding protein Srr1/2 and hyaluronidase hylB, participate in bacterial colonization and invasion through distinct mechanisms (Ma et al., 2025). In contrast, variations in capsular polysaccharide synthesis genes directly affect immune evasion and vaccine efficacy (Richardson et al., 2025).

S. agalactiae exhibits complex phenotypic characteristics and molecular diversity in its resistance mechanism. Clindamycin resistance primarily manifests in three patterns: constitutive macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B(cMLSB), inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (iMLSB), and the uncommon CRES phenotype (also referred to as L-type, defined as clindamycin-resistant and erythromycin-susceptible). The cMLSB phenotype is mediated by the ermB gene, conferring intrinsic resistance through 23S rRNA methylation. The iMLSB phenotype requires the erm gene expression, which is induced by erythromycin. The CRES phenotype is mediated by the lnu(B) or lsa(C/E) (He et al., 2022). A Polish study indicated that among 421 clinical isolates, the distribution proportions of these three phenotypes were 78.2%, 14.9%, and 6.9%, respectively, with ermB being significantly associated with serotype V (odds ratio = 4.3) (Kamińska et al., 2024). Tetracycline resistance primarily involves tetM (ribosomal protection) and tetO/tetS (efflux pump) mechanisms. Quinolone resistance mainly stems from mutations in gyrA and parC, particularly the dual mutation pattern of gyrA_S81L combined with parC_S79Y (El-Sagheir et al., 2025). S. agalactiae drug resistance is significantly associated with specific clonal complexes (CCs) and serotypes. A pioneering analysis of South American S. agalactiae populations based on whole-genome sequencing revealed that CC19 isolates (predominantly type III) harbored the highest density of virulence and resistance determinants (Kovacec et al., 2025).

The colocalization of resistance and virulence genes on mobile genetic elements forms unique “virulence-resistance” gene clusters (Shang et al., 2025). This genetic combination enhances the pathogenicity of the strain and facilitates the transmission of resistance, posing significant challenges to clinical management.

However, previous studies have indicated significant geographical variations in S. agalactiae drug resistance patterns, serotype distribution, and virulence gene combinations. Systematic molecular epidemiological research on S. agalactiae in late pregnancy remains scarce, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. As late pregnancy S. agalactiae colonization is a primary risk factor for neonatal early onset S. agalactiae, comprehensive research on antibiotic resistance, virulence characteristics, and molecular typing in this specific population is significant. The purpose of this study is to conduct targeted investigations to elucidate the key characteristics of S. agalactiae colonization in pregnant women during late pregnancy within specific regions. Through systematic detection and analysis of drug-resistance phenotypes, resistance genes, serotypes, molecular typing (including sequence types and CCs), and virulence genes, this study aims to define the epidemiological patterns and molecular characteristics of S. agalactiae in this population. The findings are expected to address the existing gap in molecular epidemiological data on S. agalactiae during late pregnancy in the Asia-Pacific region and to provide an evidence-based foundation for developing region-specific screening strategies, optimizing prevention and control measures for neonatal early-onset S. agalactiae infections, and informing the clinical selection of antimicrobial agents.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Ethics statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants for strain collection, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Jinan Maternity and Child Care Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University and Qingdao Municipal Hospital.

2.2. Bacterial strain collection and identification

S. agalactiae strains were collected from prenatal screening of pregnant women in the third trimester (35–37 weeks of gestation) at Grade A tertiary hospitals in Jinan and Qingdao, Shandong Province, between March and October 2024. Without using a vaginal speculum, a sterile disposable nylon swab was used to collect secretions from the lower one-third of the vaginal canal. The same swab was then used to collect rectal secretions from a site 2–3 cm above the anal sphincter. The swab was subsequently placed into a sterile sealed tube and transported immediately for testing. Following initial culture on 5% sheep blood agar, species identification was conducted using a Bruker MALDI-TOF MS system (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Germany) in accordance with standard operating procedures. All strains were primary isolates (duplicate isolates from the same patient were excluded), preserved in tryptic soy broth with 20% glycerol, and stored at –80°C. Standardized procedures were maintained throughout to ensure data reliability.

2.3. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The susceptibility of S. agalactiae strains to nine antibiotics (penicillin, ampicillin, linezolid, vancomycin, tigecycline, clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, tetracycline) was determined using the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used as the quality control strain in each batch to verify accuracy. Results were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-S33 guidelines. The D-test was performed to differentiate constitutive (cMLSB) and inducible (iMLSB) resistance phenotypes. Oxoid antimicrobial disks (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing erythromycin (15 μg) and clindamycin (2 μg) were placed 15–20 mm apart on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood. After incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 18–24 hours, a “D-shaped” inhibition zone around the clindamycin disk indicated the iMLSB phenotype, whereas the absence of inhibition around the clindamycin indicated the cMLSB phenotype.

2.4. Whole genome sequencing

Frozen stocks of S. agalactiae preserved in 20% glycerol TSB were retrieved from -80°C. A 200 μL aliquot was inoculated into 5 mL of Todd-Hewitt Broth and cultured with shaking at 37°C under 5% CO2 for 16–18 hours until the logarithmic growth phase (OD600 = 0.6–0.8). A 100 µL aliquot of the revived culture was spread onto 5% sheep blood agar, and after 24 h of incubation under the same conditions, purity was confirmed by colony morphology. For DNA extraction, 1.5 mL of log-phase culture was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 minutes, and the pellet was washed twice with PBS (pH 7.2). Genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and assessed with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and agarose gel electrophoresis. Qualified DNA samples were sent to BGI Genomics (Shenzhen) for library preparation. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the DNBSEQ platform. Raw sequencing data were processed with Trimmomatic v0.39 to remove adapters and low-quality reads, and assembled de novo using SPAdes v3.9.0 to generate the final genome assembly.

2.5. Multilocus sequence typing, CC analysis, serotype identification, and minimum spanning tree construction

MLST was performed using the mlst software (v2.23.0; https://github.com/tseemann/mlst), targeting seven housekeeping genes (adhP, pheS, atr, glnA, sdhA, glcK, and tkt) according to the PubMLST typing scheme (https://pubmlst.org/sagalactiae/). The software aligned assembled genome sequences to the PubMLST allele database to assign allele numbers, and sequence types (STs) were determined from allele profiles. CCs were assigned with the goeBURST algorithm implemented in eBURST (v3.0; available at http://eburst.mlst.net). Strains sharing six of seven alleles (6/7 exact match) were grouped into the same CC, while unassigned strains were classified as “non-typeable” (NA). Serotype identification was based on sequence homology of capsular polysaccharide synthesis (cps) genes. Assembled genomes were aligned to a reference database of S. agalactiae cps sequences using BLAST+ (v2.15.0; https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Serotypes were assigned when alignments met the following thresholds: e-value ≤ 1e–5, identity ≥ 95%, and coverage ≥ 90%. To visualize genetic relationships among S. agalactiae strains, a MST was constructed from core genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). SNP calling was performed with Snippy (v4.6.0), excluding SNPs in repetitive regions and mobile genetic elements. The MST was generated with GrapeTree (v2.1; https://github.com/achtman-lab/GrapeTree) using the MSTreeV2 algorithm, where each node represented a strain and inter-node distances corresponded to the number of core genome SNPs.

2.6. Data analysis

Antimicrobial resistance gene detection: Resistance genes were identified with the srst2 tool against the CARD database (v4.0.0, website: https://card.mcmaster.ca), using thresholds of ≥ 90% sequence identity and ≥ 90% coverage.

Virulence factor analysis: Virulence factors were identified using the VFDB database (2025 edition, website: http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs) with the same srst2 thresholds (≥90% identity, ≥ 90% coverage).

Visualization: A Sankey diagram was generated using the networkD3::sankeyNetwork() function to illustrate relationships among sampling locations (Jinan and Qingdao), serotypes, STs, and CCs. Nodes and links were constructed to reflect strain distributions across these hierarchical categories.

Heatmap analysis: Heatmaps were generated to visualize associations between strains and features. Standardized data were arranged in a numerical matrix, with rows representing strains and columns representing features. The heatmap was generated using the pheatmap package (version 1.0.12) in R, with color gradients showing value distributions. Hierarchical clustering of rows and columns was performed simultaneously using the default Euclidean distance and complete linkage to reveal similarity patterns.

3. Results

3.1. Bacterial isolates and study population

In total, 178 clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae strains were collected during routine prenatal screening of pregnant women in their third trimester. The ages of the pregnant women ranged from 22 to 46 years, with a median age of 34. Among them, 85 strains were obtained from Jinan City; the age range of the women was 22–40 years, with a median age of 31. Additionally, 93 strains were obtained from Qingdao City; the age range of the women was 22–46 years, with a median of 34.

3.2. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles

Among the 178 strains, the main phenotype was cMLSb, which accounted for 64.0% (114/178). The second was iMLSb, which accounted for 32.6% (58/178) of cases. The proportion of the CRES phenotype was the lowest at approximately 3.4% (6/178).

All 178 strains were sensitive to penicillin, ampicillin, linezolid, vancomycin, and tigecycline. Except for clindamycin, the resistance rates to erythromycin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline were 95.5% (170/178), 60.1% (107/178), and 56.7% (101/178), respectively. Multidrug resistance (MDR) analysis showed that 91.6% (163/178) of the isolates were MDR (defined as resistance to ≥3 classes of antimicrobial agents). The predominant MDR patterns were clindamycin (Gaddy et al., 2024) + erythromycin (ERY) + levofloxacin (LEV) (36.5%, 65/178) and CLI + ERY + tetracycline (TET) (31.5%, 56/178), followed by the quadruple-resistance pattern CLI + ERY + TET + LEV (21.9%, 39/178). (Figure 1). These findings indicate that erythromycin-clindamycin co-resistance formed the core of the resistance profile, which frequently coexisted with resistance to tetracycline and/or levofloxacin. Collectively, these combinations constituted the primary multidrug resistance phenotypes of the isolates in this study.

Figure 1.

Stacked bar chart showing the distribution of different MDS isolates by percentage. From top to bottom: purple (CLI+ERY+LEV), blue (CLI+ERY+TET+LEV), orange (CLI+ERY+TET), pink (CLI+LEV+TET), and green (Non-MDR). CLI, ERY, LEV, and TET indicate specific resistances.

Distribution of multidrug resistance (MDR) patterns in clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae (n=178; MDR ≥3 drug classes resistant).

3.3. Serotypes, sequence types, and CCs distributions

3.3.1. Diversity of molecular epidemiology

In this study, 15 STs were identified through multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis, which showed significant polymorphic distribution characteristics. Among them, ST10 (37.6%, 67/178) was the dominant type, whereas ST19 (20.8%, 37/178) and ST529 (16.9%, 30/178) were the second most dominant types. The combined proportion of the three types was 75.3%, which constituted the core epidemic strain in this study. The other minor types, namely ST1, ST862, and ST890, accounted for approximately 3.9% respectively, whereas ST2231 and ST314, which were rare, were each detected in only 0.6% of the samples. Only one strain had an unknown ST.

In terms of the distribution of CCs, our results revealed a clear hierarchical structure. CC12 (38.2%), the dominant clone, corresponded to ST10, whereas CC19 (23.6%) and CC327 (19.1%) were the second most dominant clone groups. ST19 was entirely attributed to CC19, while ST529 mainly concentrated on CC327 (34/36). Additionally, seven strains (approximately 3.9%) could not be classified under a known CC, which may represent a new genetic lineage.

The distribution of serotypes showed a typical three-level pattern. The dominant serotypes, Ib (38.2%) and V (30.9%), accounted for 69.1% and were significantly associated with CC12 (ST10-Ib) and CC19/CC327 (ST19/ST529-V), respectively. The secondary serotype was III (22.5%), which mainly corresponded to strains CC17 and CC19. Rare serotypes, such as Ia, II, and VI, each accounted for 1.7%. IV serotype was not detected. Further details are presented in Table 1. The evolutionary relationship between the population structure and serotype based on MLST is shown in Figure 2.

Table 1.

Serotype, sequence type, and clonal complex distribution of clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae isolate: total and regional comparisons (Jinan vs. Qingdao, Shandong Province).

Typing category Type Total (n=178) Jinan (n=85) Qingdao (n=93) Notes
Sequence Type (ST) ST1 7 (3.9%) 4 (4.7%) 3 (3.2%) Belongs to CC1
ST10 67 (37.6%) 37 (43.5%) 30 (32.3%) Dominant ST in both regions; belongs to CC12
ST17 5 (2.8%) 3 (3.5%) 2 (2.2%) Belongs to CC17
ST19 37 (20.8%) 17 (20.0%) 20 (21.5%) Belongs to CC19
ST23 4 (2.2%) 2 (2.4%) 2 (2.2%) Belongs to CC23
ST27 5 (2.8%) 2 (2.4%) 3 (3.2%)
ST2231 1 (0.6%) 1 (1.2%) Not detected Jinan-specific ST
ST3 2 (1.1%) 1 (1.2%) 1 (1.1%)
ST314 1 (0.6%) Not detected 1 (1.1%) Qingdao-specific ST
ST485 2 (1.1%) 1 (1.2%) 1 (1.1%)
ST529 30 (16.9%) 10 (11.8%) 20 (21.5%) Significantly higher in Qingdao; mainly belongs to CC327
ST862 7 (3.9%) 6 (7.1%) 1 (1.1%)
ST890 7 (3.9%) Not detected 7 (7.5%) Qingdao-specific ST
ST88 2 (1.1%) Not detected 2 (2.2%) Qingdao-specific ST
Unknown 1 (0.6%) Not detected 1 (1.1%)
Clonal Complex CC1 9 (5.1%) 5 (5.9%) 4 (3.2%) Mainly corresponds to ST1/serotype Ia
CC12 68 (38.2%) 38 (44.7%) 30 (32.3%) Dominant CC in both regions; mainly corresponds to ST10/serotype Ib
CC17 5 (2.8%) 3 (3.5%) 2 (2.2%) Mainly corresponds to ST17/serotype III
CC19 42 (23.6%) 19 (22.4%) 23 (24.7%) Mainly corresponds to ST19/serotypes III/V
CC23 4 (2.2%) 2 (2.4%) 2 (2.2%) Mainly corresponds to ST23/serotype V
CC327 34 (19.1%) 12 (14.1%) 22 (23.7%) Higher in Qingdao; mainly corresponds to ST529/serotype V
CC452 7 (3.9%) 3 (3.5%) 4 (4.3%) Scattered serotype distribution
NA 7 (3.9%) 4 (4.7%) 3 (3.2%) No corresponding CC identified
Serotype Ia 9 (5.1%) 3 (3.5%) 6 (6.5%) Mainly belongs to CC1
Ib 68 (38.2%) 38 (44.7%) 30 (32.3%) Dominant serotype in Jinan; mainly belongs to CC12
II 3 (1.7%) 2 (2.4%) 1 (1.1%) Scattered CC distribution
III 40 (22.5%) 23 (27.1%) 17 (18.3%) Mainly belongs to CC19/CC17
V 55 (30.9%) 18 (21.2%) 37 (39.8%) Dominant serotype in Qingdao; mainly belongs to CC19/CC327
VI 3 (1.7%) 1 (1.2%) 2 (2.2%) Scattered CC distribution
Figure 2.

Network diagram showing clusters and connections labeled with sequence types (ST) and clonal complexes (CC). Circles vary in size and color, indicating different serotypes. Larger circles include ST10, ST19, and ST529, with connections to smaller circles. A legend indicates serotype categories with associated isolate counts shown in brackets.

Phylogenetic analysis of the association between population structure (based on MLST) and Serotypes of S. agalactiae..

3.3.2. Molecular and epidemiological characteristics of S. agalactiae in Jinan and Qingdao

Among the 85 strains isolated from Jinan, ST10 was the most dominant, accounting for 43.5%. ST10, ST19, and ST529 formed a “tripartite confrontation” pattern, accounting for a combined 75.3%. ST2231 was detected only in Jinan, suggesting the possible existence of region-specific variant strains. In Qingdao (n = 93), ST10 (32.3%) formed a triangular equilibrium with ST19 and ST529 (21.5% each), and no single dominant type was observed. In terms of the diversity index, 13 STs were detected in Qingdao and 11 in Jinan. ST890 accounted for 7.5% of the total, which is a regional characteristic. The detection rate of ST88 was 2.2%, and its distribution may be related to the adaptability of specific hosts.

Regarding the distribution of CCs, CC12 was the most dominant in both regions (44.7% in Jinan vs. 32.3% in Qingdao); however, there were differences in the dominant serotypes (Ib in Jinan vs. V in Qingdao). For CC19, the proportions were similar in both regions (23.5% in Jinan vs. 24.7% in Qingdao), with both characteristics of dual serotypes III and V. CC327 was more prominent in Qingdao (23.7% vs. 14.1% in Jinan) and was strongly associated with the V serotype.

Serotype Ib was the most prevalent serotype in Jinan, accounting for 44.7% (38/85) of the cases, followed by serotypes III (27.1%) and V (21.2%). Meanwhile, V accounted for 39.8% (37/93) of the Qingdao isolates and was the dominant serotype. Serotypes Ib (32.3%) and III (18.3%) were then followed up. The detection rate of type Ia was 6.5% in Qingdao, which was 1.86 times that in Jinan, indicating regional specificity. No serotype IV strains were detected in either region. Further details are presented in Table 1.

In Jinan, the molecular transmission chain showed serotype Ib as the core starting point and was associated with CC12 through the dominant type ST10, forming the dominant transmission chain of “Ib-ST10-CC12.” Serotype III was mainly connected to CC19 via ST19, forming the secondary transmission route of “III-ST19-CC19.” However, the strains from Qingdao presented a transmission pattern centered on serotype V. They were strongly associated with CC327 through ST529 to construct the dominant chain of “V-ST529-CC327.” The proportion of “Ib-ST10-CC12” was relatively reduced compared to that in Jinan. Further details are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Sankey diagram illustrating bacterial strain flows between Jinan and Qingdao. Strains are shown as colored paths labeled with STs (e.g., ST10, ST19) and CCs (e.g., CC12, CC19). The diagram displays movement across various serotypes with corresponding color-coded blocks, indicating relationships and diversity between regions.

Sankey diagram showing associations among serotypes, MLST, and clonal complexes of clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae strains in Jinan and Qingdao Regions.

3.4. Analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes

3.4.1. Overall distribution of resistance genes and characteristics of multidrug-resistant strains

Sixteen antibiotic resistance genes were detected, and all strains showed obvious multidrug-resistant characteristics. The structural resistance gene mreA was widespread (100%, 178/178), constituting the basis for inherent resistance in S. agalactiae. ermB was dominant (80.3%, 143/178), whereas the proportions of the efflux pump genes mefA and msrD were each 17.4% (31/178). tetM (31.5%, 56/178) and tetO (24.2%, 43/178) were the main determinants of resistance, and the detection rate of tetS was extremely low (1.7%, 3/178). Meanwhile, aminoglycoside-modified enzyme genes showed gradient distribution characteristics. Among them, aph(3’)-III was the most common (18.5%, 33/178), significantly higher than ant(6)-Ia (9.0%, 16/178) and aac(6’)-aph(2”) (8.4%, 15/178). The detection rates of gyrA and parC mutations were both approximately 60.1% (107/178).

Among the 91.6% (163/178) MDR strains, resistance genes exhibited characteristic combination patterns: In strains with the “CLI+ERY+LEV” resistance pattern, the co-occurrence rate of ermB and gyrA/parC dual mutations reached 92.3% (59/64); in strains with the “CLI+ERY+TET” resistance pattern, the synergistic carriage rate of ermB and tetM/tetO was 87.5% (49/56); all “four-drug resistant” strains (CLI+ERY+TET+LEV) simultaneously carried ermB, tetM/tetO, and gyrA/parC mutations, among which 94.9% (37/39) were positive for the aminoglycoside resistance gene aph(3’)-III, indicating a broader resistance spectrum.

3.4.2. Relationship between drug-resistance genes and CCs

Significant differences in resistance gene profiles were observed among different clonal complexes. All CCs harbored mreA, while other resistance genes showed clone-specific distribution (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Bar graphs show gene frequency across seven categories: CC12 (light blue), CC19 (orange), CC327 (yellow), CC1 (red), CC23 (light green), CC452 (blue) and CC17(green). Genes include antimicrobial resistance and mutations, with varied frequency percentages on the x-axis.

Relationship between antimicrobial resistance genes and clonal complexes of s. agalactiae strains.

CC12 was dominated by ermB (100%) and gyrA/parC mutations (95.6%), exhibiting dual resistance to macrolides and quinolones. The tetM/tetO were not detected. CC19 was characterized by the co-occurrence of tetM (88.1%) and parC/gyrA mutations (both 85.7%), accompanied by a variety of macrolide/lincosamide resistance genes, thus exhibiting significant multidrug resistance. It revealed relatively concentrated resistance gene profile in CC327, with high-frequency co-occurrence of ermB (97.1%) and tetO (91.2%), while the detection rate of gyrA/parC mutations was only 5.9%. CC17 was the single fully resistant clone and all strains carried the ermB/tetO/aph(3’)-IIIa combination. CC23 was characterized by lsaC-mediated (66.7%) specific lincosamide resistance, with the detection rate of the ermB was 33.3%.

3.4.3. Analysis of drug resistance gene evolution based on the minimum spanning tree

Using the minimum spanning tree algorithm, we systematically revealed the evolutionary characteristics of erm and lnuB in different clone populations (Figure 5). The population structure of erm-positive strains identified CC12 (ST10, serotype Ib) as the predominant clone, implying a specific advantage in erm spread. CC19 (ST19) and CC327 (ST529) displayed serotype diversity (III and V), supporting multiple independent erm acquisition events. In contrast, the erm exhibited a dispersed distribution in CC1, pointing to dissemination via independent evolutionary events or horizontal gene transfer rather than clonal spread. The lnuB-positive strains were concentrated within specific lineages (e.g., CC327, CC19, and ST19) with certain (e.g., CC19) demonstrating serotype diversity (III and V). In contrast, lnuB-negative strains were widely dispersed across multiple, diverse clonal complexes. Both lnuB-positive and negative strains coexisted in CC19.

Figure 5.

Network diagrams labeled A, B, C, and D, each displaying nodes connected by lines, representing different serotypes in various colors. A legend shows serotypes with isolate counts in parentheses.

Phylogenetic distribution of s. agalactiae strains across clonal complexes, stratified by erm and inu(B)carriage status. Panels denote strain subsets: (A)erm-positive, (B)erm-negative, (C)lnu(B)-positive, (D)lnu(B)-negative.

3.5. Analysis of virulence genes

3.5.1. Overall distribution and functional characteristics of virulence genes

Virulence gene analysis revealed that the key pathogenic factors were highly conserved. All strains carried cylE, hylB, and pavA. Belonging to the immune escape system, α-protein family genes (98.9%, 176/178) and complement resistance protein gene scpB (90.4%, 161/178) were nearly ubiquitous. The fibronectin-binding protein encoded by fbsA (99.4%, 177/178) and laminin-binding protein by lmb (92.7%, 165/178) formed a “dual-core” adhesion system, which collaborated with the pilus structure protein encoded by PI (94.9%, 169/178) and surface protein by Srr (63.5%,113/178) to mediate host colonization. The hemolysin gene hylB was detected in all the strains. Together with the CAMP factor encoded by cfb (98.3%, 175/178), they form a key molecular basis for tissue invasion. Additionally, Figure 6 shows the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of SNPS in the core genome and the status of resistance genes and virulence factors.

Figure 6.

Bar charts display the prevalence of various virulence genes across CCs (CC12, CC19, CC327, CC1, CC23, CC452, and CC17). Each chart shows percentage values ranging from zero to one hundred percent . Differing colors represent different CCs.

Relationship between virulence genes and clonal complexes of s. agalactiae strains.

3.5.2. Clone-specific correlation between virulence genes and CCs

Virulence gene profiles of different CCs showed significant clone-specificity, reflecting evolutionary strategies adapted to diverse host microenvironments (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Heatmap displaying various categories and color-coded data distribution. Rows represent different isolated strains labeled with codes on the right, and columns are labeled at the bottom with virulence and drug resistance genes. Colors such as blue, pink, and black indicate different values, with groupings suggesting clustering patterns. Categories like “City”, “Serotype” and “ST,” are shown on the left, with corresponding color codes.

Heatmap of antimicrobial resistance profiles and genotypic characteristics of s. agalactiae strains.

CC12 was dominated by alpha protein AphaC (100%) and surface protein Srr1 (100%) and the detection rates of adhesion genes lmb and scpB both reached 97.1%, while lacking specific virulence factors such as ALPI and ALP23. The core virulence characteristics of CC327 included the Rib (82.4%) and fimbrial genes (PI1 82.4%, PI2a 88.2%), with balanced expression of adhesion and immune evasion-related genes. CC17 carried signature invasion factors HvgA and PI2b. The Srr2 was a CC-specific virulence gene, highly associated with neonatal invasive infections. It was uniquely co-expressed ALP23 (55.6%) and core virulence factors (Srr1/lmb/scpB all 100%) in CC1, with distinct specificity in virulence gene combinations. CC23 highly expressed ALPI (66.7%) and ALP23 (33.3%). Meanwhile, the distribution of other virulence genes was consistent with most CCs. The CC452 showed relatively streamlined virulence profile, with AphaC/Srr1 detected in 100% of the strains and lmb/scpB 85.7%, lacking special signature virulence genes.

3.5.3. Geographical distribution and co-evolutionary characteristics of virulence genes

Dominant clones in Jinan and Qingdao showed geographical specificity in virulence gene distribution. In the dominant clone CC12 of Jinan, the detection rates of Srr1 and lmb (100%) were significantly higher than those of the same CC strains in Qingdao (83.3%). The Rib detection rate in the dominant clone CC327 of Qingdao (86.4%) was higher than that in Jinan (66.7%).

Virulence gene expression in multidrug-resistant clones showed co-evolutionary characteristics. In dominant MDR clones such as CC12, CC19, and CC327, the detection rates of adhesion genes (fbsA, lmb) and immune evasion genes (alpha protein family, scpB) were significantly higher than those in non-dominant clones. Among them, the carriage rate of the PI fimbrial gene cluster in CC19 MDR strains (95.2%) was higher than that in non-MDR strains (71.4%), suggesting that the resistance and virulence genes might be co-transmitted through mobile genetic elements, enhancing bacterial colonization and pathogenic capabilities.

4. Discussion

S. agalactiae is a significant pathogen in perinatal infections, with its distribution of serotypes, STs, and CCs showing notable regional and population-specific variations. Over the past decade in China, the predominant serotypes colonizing pregnant women have been III, Ib, and V, with serotype Ia also prevalent in some regions. Serotype III is the most frequently reported in most areas (Cheng et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2023). However, our research indicated that serotype Ib was the predominant one, followed by V and III. These three serotypes collectively accounted for 91.6% of all isolates, highlighting the geographical heterogeneity of serotypes. At the molecular level, ST19 and ST10 are core STs among strains isolated from pregnant women in China, although detection rates of other types vary significantly. Among these, ST19/III is a frequently observed dominant clone combination, while ST10 is often closely associated with serotype Ib (Wang et al., 2023, 2018; Wu et al., 2019). In our region, ST10 was the dominant type, followed by ST19 and ST529. This pattern aligns with findings from Linyi, Shandong Province (Zhou et al., 2024), but differs from most other regions in China where ST19 predominates (Chen et al., 2024; Li et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2022), underscoring inter-provincial variations. Notably, the detection rate of ST17 (often associated with neonatal invasive infections) was relatively low in our study, which is attributable to our focus on routine prenatal screening samples of third-trimester pregnant women. Our results showed that CC12 was the dominant clonal complex, highly corresponding to ST10, with ST10/Ib being the predominant combination. This is largely consistent with a study on S. agalactiae colonization and infection in Shanghai (Zhou et al., 2025), but differs from Haikou (Mai et al., 2025). In summary, the distribution characteristics of serotypes, STs, and CCs among S. agalactiae strains from pregnant women in this region share common features with the national epidemiological patterns over the past decade, while also exhibiting distinct regional specificity. The data from this study supplement the regional epidemiological profile of S. agalactiae, clarify the local epidemiological characteristics in pregnant women, and provide data support for optimizing local S. agalactiae screening strategies and vaccine development.

S. agalactiae colonization of the genital tract of women during pregnancy is a major risk factor for early-onset neonatal infections, such as sepsis and meningitis (Absalon et al., 2021). Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) is the standard of care for reducing this risk (Cagno et al., 2012). For pregnant women with penicillin allergy, clindamycin is the recommended alternative agent according to international guidelines (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2020). However, the emergence and spread of resistant strains can severely compromise the efficacy of such prophylaxis, posing a significant threat to maternal and infant safety.

Notably, S. agalactiae resistance to clindamycin exhibits marked regional heterogeneity globally. The clindamycin resistance rate among reproductive-age women is approximately 40% in South Korea (Shin et al., 2025) and 35.4% in Sri Lanka (Sapugahawatte et al., 2022), while China faces a more severe scenario with a persistently high resistance rate rising by 4%–5% annually (Liu et al., 2023). This regional disparity highlights the urgency of targeted resistance control strategies.

Clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae strains often display multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotypes. A study from Geneva University Hospital reported that among pregnant women, S. agalactiae had a 28% clindamycin resistance rate, 30% erythromycin resistance rate, and 92% co-resistance rate to erythromycin and clindamycin (Capanna et al., 2013). A domestic study on clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae showed even higher resistance rates: 96.3% for erythromycin, 62.7% for levofloxacin, and 53.6% for tetracycline, with some strains exhibiting resistance to five antibiotics (clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol) (Liu et al., 2023).

Consistent with these reports, our study of 178 clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae strains found a very high erythromycin resistance rate (95.5%), along with considerable resistance to levofloxacin (60.1%) and tetracycline (56.7%). The prevalent cross-resistance and MDR patterns observed suggest that the regional dissemination of resistance genes under sustained antibiotic selection pressure may have synergistic effects. This underscores the urgent need for targeted surveillance and control strategies to curb the proliferation of these resistant clones.

Ribosomal methylation (MLSB-type resistance) is the predominant mechanism of clindamycin resistance in S. agalactiae, mediated by the erm gene family (Leclercq, 2002). Among these, ermB has the widest global distribution, with a prevalence rate as high as 80%–95% in China. Meanwhile, ErmA (5%–15%) and ermTR (<5%, predominantly found in Europe) are significantly less common (Liu et al., 2023). This mechanism can be further classified into cMLSB and iMLSB phenotypes. cMLSB results from the continuous expression of the ermB gene, accounting for 60%–85% of resistant strains in China, and can be detected directly via routine drug sensitivity tests. iMLSB accounts for 10%–30% of cases in China and requires erm gene expression, which is induced by erythromycin and must be confirmed via the D test (Liu et al., 2023). In this study, 89.9% of the strains harbored erm family genes (ermB or ermA), which represent the core mechanism of cross-resistance to clindamycin and erythromycin. As an intrinsic gene of S. agalactiae (Clarebout et al., 2001), mreA was detected in all strains. The results indicated that the predominant clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae phenotype was cMLSB (64.0%, 114/178), followed by iMLSB (32.6%, 58/178), consistent with previous studies. Drug inactivation and efflux mechanisms (non-MLSB resistance) were primarily observed in CRES phenotype strains exhibiting erythromycin susceptibility and clindamycin resistance. Our study observed that the detection rate of the CRES phenotype was 3.4% (6/178), which is consistent with the globally reported prevalence (2%–8%) (Liu et al., 2023). lnu(B) is the primary determinant of the CRES phenotype. Inu(B) encodes lincosamide nucleotidyl transferase, which catalyzes the O-adenosylation modification of lincosamide antibiotics, such as clindamycin, inactivating them and mediating clindamycin resistance. As lincosamide nucleotidyl transferase has no effect on macrolide antibiotics such as erythromycin, the strain remains sensitive to erythromycin (Morici et al., 2017). Additionally, Isa(C/E) encodes a type II ATP-binding cassette transporter that actively effluxes clindamycin from the cell, thereby reducing the intracellular drug concentration. This mechanism confers resistance exclusively to clindamycin, without affecting erythromycin susceptibility (Si et al., 2015). In our study, among the six CRES phenotypic strains, five simultaneously harbored both lnu(B) and lsaE, whereas the other strain carried only lsa(C).

Fluoroquinolone resistance in S. agalactiae is primarily attributed to mutations in the DNA topoisomerase genes gyrA and parC. Characteristic mutations in gyrA are serine-to-leucine substitutions at position 81 (Ser-81-Leu), whereas those in parC involve serine-to-phenylalanine or tyrosine substitutions at position 79 (Ser-79-Phe/Tyr) (Chen et al., 2024). Our study indicated that these two gene mutations were simultaneously detected in all the levofloxacin-resistant strains. This confirms that the combination of mutations at positions 81 in gyrA and 79 in parC is the key molecular basis for S. agalactiae resistance to fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

The mechanism of tetracycline resistance in S. agalactiae primarily involves efflux pump-mediated drug efflux and target site protection mediated by ribosomal protection proteins. Proteins encoded by tetM, tetO, and tetS bind to ribosomes, alter their conformation, and block tetracycline binding to the target site, thereby mediating resistance (Blake et al., 2025). Further analysis revealed a differential distribution of these three tet genes across distinct CCs. tetM and tetO co-occurred in CC19, CC327, and CC1, tetM alone was present in CC452 and CC23, and tetO alone was found in CC17. Nevertheless, CC12 lacked any of the three genes, and tetS was absent from all the identified CCs. This clonal specificity in gene distribution suggests that tet transmission may be linked to the spread of specific clones, providing molecular epidemiological clues for understanding the evolution and prevalence of tetracycline resistance in S. agalactiae.

Although levofloxacin and tetracycline are not routinely used in pregnant women, the high resistance rates of the two antibiotics among clindamycin-resistant S. agalactiae strains indirectly reveal that inappropriate antibiotic use in the environment or other populations may exert “cross-selection” pressure on pregnant women. These results provide theoretical and empirical support for antibiotic-tiered management strategies, thereby curbing the evolutionary accumulation and horizontal transmission of resistance genes from their sources.

We revealed the population structure characteristics of S. agalactiae by comprehensively analyzing molecular typing, demonstrating both similarities and significant differences with global and domestic epidemiological patterns. Firstly, CC12 (ST10-Ib) accounted for 38.2% of the isolates, holding a dominant position in this study—this differs from reports in South China where CC19 (ST19-III) was predominant (Zhu et al., 2020), but aligns with a Beijing-based study showing high prevalence of ST10-Ib in pregnant women (Chen et al., 2024). Secondly, the prevalence of CC19 (ST19-V) (23.6%) is consistent with Asian regional reports (25%–35%) (Chen et al., 2024). Notably, the ST529-CC327-V combination exhibited a high prevalence (16.9%) in our study, markedly higher than that reported in eastern China (8.3%) (Liu et al., 2023) and central China (5.7%) (Chen et al., 2024), reflecting unique regional selection pressures in Shandong. Geographical variations were also observed in CC17 (ST17-III), which accounted for only 4.5% in our study—significantly lower than in Africa (>60%) (Bob-Manuel et al., 2021) (30) but comparable to other Chinese studies (3%–6%) (Chen et al., 2024; Zhu et al., 2020). The dominant transmission chains differed by region: “Ib-ST10-CC12” (44.7%) in Jinan and “V-ST529-CC327” (39.8%) in Qingdao, with secondary chains (e.g., “III-ST19-CC19” in Jinan) showing varying proportions. This highlights the need for region-specific prevention strategies.

Evolutionarily, the strict correspondence between ST19 and CC19, as well as ST529 and CC327, strongly suggests genetic stability within clonal complexes (CCs) during evolution—likely driven by niche adaptation or restricted horizontal gene transfer (HGT). A novel finding is the Qingdao-specific ST890 (7.5%), which was exclusively associated with serotype V and CC327, forming a “V-ST890-CC327” sublineage not described in prior Chinese or global studies (Chen et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2023; Zhu et al., 2020). This sublineage harbored a unique combination of resistance genes (ermB + tetO + aph(3’)-III) and virulence factors (Rib + PI1), suggesting recent adaptive evolution in the coastal region. Additionally, rare STs (ST2231, ST314) detected in this study (0.6% each) may represent emerging evolutionary lineages, as they have not been reported in previous Chinese studies (Chen et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2023; Zhu et al., 2020). Furthermore, the coexistence of both ermB-positive and -negative strains in CC19, and lnuB-positive strains forming a distinct phylogenetic subcluster within CC19/CC327, indicates dynamic resistance gene acquisition/loss—potentially mediated by mobile genetic elements (e.g., transposons, plasmids) (Morici et al., 2017; Si et al., 2015). This clonal-specific resistance evolution pattern, coupled with regional serotype heterogeneity, underscores the complexity of S. agalactiae adaptation under antibiotic selection pressure.

The clonal architecture of S. agalactiae in our population was strongly associated with distinct antibiotic resistance profiles, revealing evolutionary strategies shaped by selection pressure. The dominant clone CC12 (ST10-Ib) exhibited a streamlined resistance signature—exclusive reliance on ermB-mediated macrolide resistance and target-site mutations (gyrA/parC) conferring quinolone resistance—without tetracycline resistance determinants (tetM/tetO). This suggests a fitness cost or lack of selection for tet genes in this successful lineage, which dominates the transmission chain in Jinan. In contrast, CC19 (ST19-V/III) displayed a complex, multidrug-resistant genotype, accumulating diverse resistance genes (tetM, lnuB, aph(3’)-IIIa, catQ), which aligns with its role as a major reservoir for horizontal gene transfer in China (Si et al., 2015). Meanwhile, CC327 (ST529-V), the predominant clone in Qingdao, showed a focused resistance profile with high-frequency co-occurrence of ermB and tetO, reflecting niche adaptation to coastal regional selection pressures. Notably, the hypervirulent CC17 (ST17-III) clone, though rare (4.5%), consistently carried a ‘full-house’ resistance combination (ermB/tetO/aph(3’)-IIIa), reinforcing its concerning profile as a high-risk, broad-resistant lineage associated with invasive neonatal disease (Zhu et al., 2020). These clonally restricted resistance patterns likely reflect sustained antibiotic selection within specific host niches (e.g., CC17 in mother-infant dyads) and underscore the need for clone-aware stewardship.

Regarding virulence genes, our results revealed both highly conserved core virulence factors and clonally specific accessory virulence determinants. The universal presence of core invasion-associated genes (cfb [98.3%], cylE [100%], hylB [100%]) and adhesion genes (pavA [100%], fbsA [99.4%]) ensures the fundamental pathogenic potential of all strains. This is consistent with the established model of S. agalactiae pathogenesis, where a core set of virulence factors is essential for initial host colonization and invasion (Vornhagen et al., 2017). However, significant differences in virulence gene profiles were observed across CCs, reflecting niche adaptation. CC12, the dominant clone in Jinan, was characterized by 100% expression of host cell adhesion factors (AphaC, Srr1) and high detection rates of lmb (97.1%) and scpB (97.1%), which may enhance its mucosal colonization efficiency in the maternal genital tract (Li et al., 2025; Ma et al., 2025). In contrast, the hypervirulent CC17 clone invariably carried the signature neurotropic invasion factors hvgA (100%) and the Pilus Island 2b (PI-2b) pathogenicity island (100%), a genetic combination strongly and specifically associated with neonatal meningitis and high mortality rates (Almeida et al., 2017; Aznar et al., 2024). These findings confirm a co-evolutionary pattern between clonal lineages and virulence phenotypes, suggesting that successful clones optimize distinct virulence factor combinations to thrive in specific host microenvironments (e.g., CC17 in the neonate, CC12 in pregnant women).

The clonally specific co-distribution of resistance and virulence genes—such as CC12 (ermB+gyrA/parC mutations + AphaC/Srr1), CC19 (tetM/lnuB + PI1), and CC17 (ermB/tetO/aph(3’)-IIIa + hvgA/PI-2b)—suggests integrated adaptive strategies under dual selection pressures. The simultaneous enrichment of multidrug resistance genes and key virulence determinants within dominant CCs points to potential “resistance-virulence” synergistic evolution, possibly facilitated by co-localization on mobile genetic elements (e.g., transposons, plasmids) (Shang et al., 2025). This synergy has critical implications: it implies that the most successful, transmissible clones may also be the most resistant and pathogenic. Therefore, surveillance programs must evolve from monitoring resistance alone to integrating molecular typing and virulence gene screening. Targeted monitoring of high-risk “resistance-virulence” clones (e.g., CC12, CC19, CC17) and timely adjustment of empirical prophylaxis guidelines are imperative to mitigate the public health threat posed by these optimized bacterial lineages.

This study revealed the clone-specific evolutionary patterns in the distribution of the erm and lnuB across S. agalactiae clonal clusters. The erm was significantly enriched in CC12, CC19, and CC327 (Morici et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2013), a phenomenon driven by both clonal expansion (Wu et al., 2025) and horizontal gene transfer (HGT, observed in the serotype-diverse CC19 and CC327). The frequent association of erm with mobile genetic elements (MGEs) such as transposons and integrative conjugative elements (ICEs) supports its potential for horizontal transfer (Mingoia et al., 2016; Morici et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2013).

Similarly, the distribution of lnuB was highly clonal-restricted, predominantly enriched in CC19 (61.9%). In contrast, lnuB-negative strains were widely dispersed across other clonal clusters. The coexistence of lnuB-positive and negative strains within CC19 indicates microheterogeneity, likely shaped by regional antibiotic selection pressure or independent HGT events (Brenciani et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2025).

Collectively, the distribution of resistance genes in S. agalactiae is determined by clonal background, resulting from the interplay of host adaptation, local antibiotic pressure, and MGE-mediated HGT. In clones such as CC19, the co-occurrence of ermB with other resistance genes (e.g., tetM, tetO, aph(3′)-III) underscores their role as multidrug resistance reservoirs (Wang et al., 2013).

Future research should integrate genomic epidemiological approaches to track MGE dynamics and core genome evolution-such as exemplified in mobilome studies, unravel the co-evolutionary mechanisms of resistance and virulence (Shang et al., 2025). Although our research provides insights based on samples from Shandong Province, larger multi-center longitudinal studies across diverse regions of China are needed to fully elucidate the national epidemiological characteristics and evolutionary patterns of resistant S. agalactiae clones (Chen et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2023).

In addition, due to the failure to integrate clinical background information of pregnant women and health outcome data of neonates, the clinical association between S. agalactiae colonization characteristics and maternal-neonatal health outcomes has not been fully established. Future studies may incorporate multi-dimensional clinical indicators for in-depth analysis, so as to more comprehensively evaluate the clinical significance and potential impacts of S. agalactiae colonization. In this study, an unknown ST strain was identified. Subsequent studies will further verify whether the strain represents a novel ST by Sanger sequencing, which constitutes a limitation of this study. If confirmed as a novel ST, this finding will enrich the MLST typing database of S.agalactiae. Additionally, investigating its antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene profiles will provide new insights for the epidemiological surveillance of S.agalactiae among third-trimester pregnant women in China. Even if it can match the existing ST, that will not affect the overall results and conclusions of this study.

In summary, this study provides two key findings with direct implications for the targeted control of S. agalactiae. Firstly, we identified clonal microheterogeneity within high-risk lineages such as CC19, characterized by the co-circulation of erm/lnuB-positive and -negative subpopulations. This pattern is consistent with the established role of macrolide/lincosamide selection pressure in enriching resistant subpopulations (Leclercq, 2002; Wu et al., 2025) and the broader principle of antibiotic-driven population differentiation in bacteria (Ågren et al., 2014; Andersson et al., 2019), thereby pinpointing a critical target for focused surveillance. Secondly, we delineated two concurrent dissemination pathways for major resistance genes (erm and lnuB): clonal expansion of CC12 (the dominant lineage in the Jinan region) and mobile genetic element (MGE)-mediated horizontal gene transfer within CC19 and CC327. This clarifies the dual-track evolution of resistance in local settings and addresses a key gap in understanding regional AMR dynamics.

To translate these insights into practice, a dual-strategy approach is warranted. Dynamic surveillance must evolve beyond tracking dominant clones (CC12, CC19, CC17) to actively monitor resistance gene flux within critical reservoirs like CC19. Concurrently, stewardship to restrict non-essential antibiotic use is vital to reduce the selection pressure fueling both clonal success and gene transfer. Furthermore, intrapartum prophylaxis guidelines should be adapted regionally based on prevailing resistance patterns, including predefined alternatives for clindamycin-resistant strains. Together, these evidence-based, precision measures offer a pragmatic framework to contain the spread of resistance and reduce the risk of mother-to-child S. agalactiae transmission.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Shandong Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Project (202301060394, 202302050293) and the Qingdao Medical and Health Scientific Research Guidance Project (2023-WJZD183).

Footnotes

Edited by: Tariq Ali, Veterinary Research Institute, Pakistan

Reviewed by: Vittoria Mattioni Marchetti, University of Pavia, Italy

Nicha Charoensri, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Medical Ethics Committees of Jinan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital and Qingdao Municipal Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

MY: Visualization, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Methodology. TY: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Data curation. SY: Resources, Writing – original draft, Investigation. LL: Resources, Writing – review & editing, Methodology. SC: Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Resources. YW: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Data curation. KW: Conceptualization, Resources, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Data curation.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1721174/full#supplementary-material

Table1.xls (51.5KB, xls)

References

  1. Absalon J., Segall N., Block S. L., Center K. J., Scully I. L., Giardina P. C., et al. (2021). Safety and immunogenicity of a novel hexavalent group B streptococcus conjugate vaccine in healthy, non-pregnant adults: a phase 1/2, randomised, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, dose-escalation trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21, 263–274. doi:  10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30478-3, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ågren J., Finn M., Bengtsson B., Segerman B. (2014). Microevolution during an Anthrax outbreak leading to clonal heterogeneity and penicillin resistance. PloS One 9, e89112. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0089112, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Almeida A., Rosinski-Chupin I., Plainvert C., Douarre P. E., Borrego M. J., Poyart C., et al. (2017). Parallel evolution of group B streptococcus hypervirulent clonal complex 17 unveils new pathoadaptive mutations. mSystems 2, e00074-17. doi:  10.1128/mSystems.00074-17, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersson D. I., Nicoloff H., Hjort K. (2019). Mechanisms and clinical relevance of bacterial heteroresistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 479–496. doi:  10.1038/s41579-019-0218-1, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . (2020). Prevention of group B streptococcal early-onset disease in newborns: ACOG committee opinion, number 797. Obstet Gynecol 135, e51–e72. doi:  10.1097/aog.0000000000003668, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aznar E., Strazielle N., Costa L., Poyart C., Tazi A., Ghersi-Egea J. F., et al. (2024). The hypervirulent Group B Streptococcus HvgA adhesin promotes central nervous system invasion through transcellular crossing of the choroid plexus. Fluids Barriers CNS 21, 66. doi:  10.1186/s12987-024-00564-2, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blake K. S., Xue Y. P., Gillespie V. J., Fishbein S. R. S., Tolia N. H., Wencewicz T. A., et al. (2025). The tetracycline resistome is shaped by selection for specific resistance mechanisms by each antibiotic generation. Nat. Commun. 16, 1452. doi:  10.1038/s41467-025-56425-5, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bob-Manuel M., McGee L., Igunma J. A., Alex-Wele M. A., Obunge O. K., Wariso K. T. (2021). Whole genome sequence based capsular typing and antimicrobial resistance prediction of Group B streptococcal isolates from colonized pregnant women in Nigeria. BMC Genomics 22, 627. doi:  10.1186/s12864-021-07929-z, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brenciani A., Tiberi E., Tili E., Mingoia M., Palmieri C., Varaldo P. E., et al. (2014). Genetic determinants and elements associated with antibiotic resistance in viridans group streptococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 69, 1197–1204. doi:  10.1093/jac/dkt495, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cagno C. K., Pettit J. M., Weiss B. D. (2012). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: updated CDC guideline. Am. Fam Physician 86, 59–65., PMID: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Capanna F., Emonet S. P., Cherkaoui A., Irion O., Schrenzel J., Martinez de Tejada B. (2013). Antibiotic resistance patterns among group B Streptococcus isolates: implications for antibiotic prophylaxis for early-onset neonatal sepsis. Swiss Med. Wkly 143, w13778. doi:  10.4414/smw.2013.13778, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen Y., Liu L., Liu J., Ji T., Gao Y., Yang D., et al. (2024). Serotype distribution, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of group B Streptococcus isolates from Chinese pregnant woman. J. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 37, 2295805. doi:  10.1080/14767058.2023.2295805, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng Z., Qu P., Ke P., Yang X., Zhou Q., Lan K., et al. (2020). Antibiotic resistance and molecular epidemiological characteristics of streptococcus agalactiae isolated from pregnant women in guangzhou, south China. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2020, 1368942. doi:  10.1155/2020/1368942, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Clarebout G., Villers C., Leclercq R. (2001). Macrolide resistance gene mreA of Streptococcus agalactiae encodes a flavokinase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 2280–2286. doi:  10.1128/aac.45.8.2280-2286.2001, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. El-Sagheir A. M. K., Wenzel M., Yli-Kauhaluoma J. (2025). Fluoroquinolones as versatile scaffolds: Potential for targeting classical and novel mechanisms to combat antibacterial resistance. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 214, 107247. doi:  10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107247, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gaddy J. A., Moore R. E., Lochner J. S., Rogers L. M., Noble K. N., Giri A., et al. (2024). Palmitate and group B Streptococcus synergistically and differentially induce IL-1β from human gestational membranes. Front. Immunol. 15. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2024.1409378, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. He W., Jiang K., Qiu H., Liao L., Wang S. (2022). 16-membered ring macrolides and erythromycin induce ermB expression by different mechanisms. BMC Microbiol. 22, 152. doi:  10.1186/s12866-022-02565-3, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kamińska D., Ratajczak M., Nowak-Malczewska D. M., Karolak J. A., Kwaśniewski M., Szumala-Kakol A., et al. (2024). Macrolide and lincosamide resistance of Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women in Poland. Sci. Rep. 14, 3877. doi:  10.1038/s41598-024-54521-y, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kovacec V., Di Gregorio S., Pajon M., Khan U. B., Poklepovich T., Campos J., et al. (2025). Genomic characterization of group B Streptococcus from Argentina: insights into prophage diversity, virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes. Microb. Genom 11, 001399. doi:  10.1099/mgen.0.001399, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leclercq R. (2002). Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34, 482–492. doi:  10.1086/324626, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li W., Fan Y., Zhu W., Liang Z., Nie S. (2025). CsrR modulates biofilm formation of ST-17 GBS through the regulation of a novel adhesion factor, BapB. Microb. Pathog. 207, 107873. doi:  10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107873, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li X., Gao W., Jia Z., Yao K., Yang J., Tong J., et al. (2023). Characterization of group B streptococcus recovered from pregnant women and newborns attending in a hospital in beijing, China. Infect. Drug Resist. 16, 2549–2559. doi:  10.2147/idr.S395942, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu Z., Jiang X., Li J., Ji W., Zhou H., Gong X., et al. (2023). Molecular characteristics and antibiotic resistance mechanisms of clindamycin-resistant Streptococcus agalactiae isolates in China. Front. Microbiol. 14. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2023.1138039, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu J., Zhao J., Huang C., Xu J., Liu W., Yu J., et al. (2022). A Facile machine learning multi-classification model for Streptococcus agalactiae clonal complexes. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 21, 50. doi:  10.1186/s12941-022-00541-3, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ma J., Wu H., Ma Z., Wu Z. (2025). Bacterial and host factors involved in zoonotic Streptococcal meningitis. Microbes Infect. 27, 105335. doi:  10.1016/j.micinf.2024.105335, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mai W., Wang H., Meng Q., Zhang J., Gong X., Zhuo Z., et al. (2025). Molecular epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of group B Streptococcus in pregnant women and neonates from Haikou, China: implications for vaccine development and antimicrobial stewardship. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 15. doi:  10.3389/fcimb.2025.1655649, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mingoia M., Morici E., Marini E., Brenciani A., Giovanetti E., Varaldo P. E. (2016). Macrolide resistance gene erm(TR) and erm(TR)-carrying genetic elements in Streptococcus agalactiae: characterization of ICESagTR7, a new composite element containing IMESp2907. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 71, 593–600. doi:  10.1093/jac/dkv408, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morici E., Simoni S., Brenciani A., Giovanetti E., Varaldo P. E., Mingoia M. (2017). A new mosaic integrative and conjugative element from Streptococcus agalactiae carrying resistance genes for chloramphenicol (catQ) and macrolides [mef(I) and erm(TR). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 64–67. doi:  10.1093/jac/dkw367, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nanduri S. A., Petit S., Smelser C., Apostol M., Alden N. B., Harrison L. H., et al. (2019). Epidemiology of invasive early-onset and late-onset group B streptococcal disease in the United States 2006 to 2015: multistate laboratory and population-based surveillance. JAMA Pediatr. 173, 224–233. doi:  10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4826, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nie S., Lu X., Jin Z., Gao J., Ma D., Deng J., et al. (2018). Characterization of group B Streptococcus isolated from sterile and non-sterile specimens in China. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 92, 56–61. doi:  10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.04.014, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Richardson N. I., Berti F., Ravenscroft N., Kuttel M. M. (2025). Molecular modeling of group B Streptococcus type II and III capsular polysaccharides explains low filter retention of type II and lack of cross-reactivity with type III. Carbohydr Polym 367, 123964. doi:  10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123964, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Russell N. J., Seale A. C., O'Driscoll M., O'Sullivan C., Bianchi-Jassir F., Gonzalez-Guarin J., et al. (2017). Maternal colonization with group B streptococcus and serotype distribution worldwide: systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 65, S100–s111. doi:  10.1093/cid/cix658, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sapugahawatte D. N., Li C., Liyanapathirana V., Kandauda C., Gihan C., Zhu C., et al. (2022). Colonization of group B streptococcus in pregnant women and their neonates from a Sri Lankan hospital. Pathogens 11, 386. doi:  10.3390/pathogens11040386, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shang K. M., Ma H., Elsheikha H. M., Wei Y. J., Zhao J. X., Qin Y., et al. (2025). Comprehensive genome catalog analysis of the resistome, virulome and mobilome in the wild rodent gut microbiota. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 11, 101. doi:  10.1038/s41522-025-00746-2, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shin A., Kim D. R., Sung J. H., Yang J., Choi S. J., Roh C. R., et al. (2025). Group B streptococcus detection rate and clindamycin resistance among reproductive-age women in korea during 2003-2022. J. Korean Med. Sci. 40, e29. doi:  10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e29, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Si H., Zhang W. J., Chu S., Wang X. M., Dai L., Hua X., et al. (2015). Novel plasmid-borne multidrug resistance gene cluster including lsa(E) from a linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolate of swine origin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 7113–7116. doi:  10.1128/aac.01394-15, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vornhagen J., Adams Waldorf K. M., Rajagopal L. (2017). Perinatal group B streptococcal infections: virulence factors, immunity, and prevention strategies. Trends Microbiol. 25, 919–931. doi:  10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.013, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang X., Cao X., Li S., Ou Q., Lin D., Yao Z., et al. (2018). Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Streptococcus agalactiae colonized in Chinese pregnant women: predominance of ST19/III and ST17/III. Res. Microbiol. 169, 101–107. doi:  10.1016/j.resmic.2017.12.004, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang J., Zhang Y., Lin M., Bao J., Wang G., Dong R., et al. (2023). Maternal colonization with group B Streptococcus and antibiotic resistance in China: systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 22, 5. doi:  10.1186/s12941-023-00553-7, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang H., Zhao C., He W., Zhang F., Zhang L., Cao B., et al. (2013). High prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant group B streptococci among clinical isolates in China and predominance of sequence type 19 with serotype III. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 1538–1541. doi:  10.1128/aac.02317-12, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wu C. S., Lin J. H., Chen M., Huang Y., Zhang Y. A. (2025). Prevalence and genetic characteristics of lincosamide resistance genes lsa(E) and lnu(B) in group B Streptococcus from southern China. Microb. Genom 11, 001482. doi:  10.1099/mgen.0.001482, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu B., Su J., Li L., Wu W., Wu J., Lu Y., et al. (2019). Phenotypic and genetic differences among group B Streptococcus recovered from neonates and pregnant women in Shenzhen, China: 8-year study. BMC Microbiol. 19, 185. doi:  10.1186/s12866-019-1551-2, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhou W., Chen X., Chen J., Zheng X., Zhang X., Chen Y., et al. (2024). Genotype distribution and high-risk factors analysis of group B streptococcus in late-stage pregnant women in the linyi region. Int. J. Microbiol. 2024, 9910073. doi:  10.1155/ijm/9910073, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhou K., Sun Z., Sun J., Xu X., Guan M. (2025). Comparative genomic analysis of hypervirulent group B streptococcus of ST12/serotype Ib suggests potential virulence factors. BMC Microbiol. 25, 698. doi:  10.1186/s12866-025-04443-0, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhu Y., Wu J., Zheng X., Liu D., Xu L., Chen D., et al. (2020). Etiological serotype and genotype distributions and clinical characteristics of group B streptococcus-inducing invasive disease among infants in South China. BMC Pediatr. 20, 146. doi:  10.1186/s12887-020-02048-2, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table1.xls (51.5KB, xls)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.


Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES