Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2026 Jan 19;16:1760314. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1760314

Correction: Biochemical and genetic characterization of Botrytis cinerea mutants resistant to the plant-derived pesticide trans-dehydromatricaria ester

Gaijuan Tang 1,2,†, Rui Nan 1,†, Hui Dong 2, Yong Wang 1, Wenhui Guo 3, Yongquan Ta 4, Yunfei Han 1, Chao Zhang 1,*, Yonghong Wang 1,*
PMCID: PMC12865607  PMID: 41640752

Author Yunfei Han was erroneously spelled as Y. F. Han.

The original version of this article has been updated.

An erroneous citation callout [13] was included in the Introduction, Paragraph 2:

“Artemisia ordosica, a wild plant with multiple potential applications, contains the bioactive compound TDDE, which has demonstrated broad-spectrum antifungal activity and holds promise as a novel fungicide.”

A space was missing in the temperature notation.

A correction has been made to section 2.11, second sentence:

The plates were incubated at 25 °C in a constant-temperature chamber for 3 days.

There was a mistake in Figure 4G as published. The y-axis label was misspelled as “Ttotal protein content (mg/g)”. The corrected Figure 4G appears below.

Figure 4.

Grouped bar charts, line graph, and data visuals comparing different treatments labeled FH, FD1, FD2, FD4, and FD7. Panels show various measurements: A) Oxalic acid levels, B) Glycerin content, C) MDA levels, D) Relative conductance over time, E) Growth inhibition at different NaCl concentrations, F) Total sugar content, G) Total protein content, and H) ATP levels. Each visual indicates variability with error bars and statistical significance marked by letters.

The differences in physiological characteristics between the parental of B. cinerea Strains and the drug resistant strains. (A) Oxalic Acid Content. (B) Glycerin. (C) MDA. (D) Relative Conductivity. (E) NaCl Sensitivity. (F) Total Sugar. (G) total protein content. (H) ATPase Activity. Different lowercase letters above bars indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).

The original version of this article has been updated.

The symbol for the correlation coefficient was incorrect n section 2.6, the last sentence:

“According to the correlation coefficient (ρ), cross-resistance was categorized as follows: no cross-resistance (ρ > 0.05 or ρ < 0.1), significant cross-resistance (0.8 < ρ ≤ 1 and ρ < 0.05), strong cross-resistance (0.6 ≤ ρ ≤ 0.8), moderate cross-resistance (0.4 ≤ ρ < 0.6), low cross-resistance (0.2 ≤ ρ < 0.4), and very low cross-resistance (0.1 ≤ ρ < 0.2).”

The citation format in section 2.6 was incomplete at the end of the paragraph:

The citation: (Li, 2021) has been corrected to: (Li, X. H., 2021).

The original version of this article has been updated.

Footnotes

Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES