The figure captions were in the wrong order in the PDF/HTML version of this paper. Figure 1 had the caption of Figure 2; Figure 2 had the caption of Figure 1; Figure 3 had the caption of Figure 6; Figure 4 had the caption of Figure 3. The order has now been corrected.
FIGURE 1.
Cannabinoids present in the extract provided by the Santa Cannabis Association.
FIGURE 2.
Flowchart of patient triage. This image summarizes the animal selection and study methodology over 90 days, representing the excluded animals and treatment groups.
FIGURE 3.
Graphical representation of HCPI and CBPI outcomes.
FIGURE 6.
Biochemical marker levels during the 90-day treatment period. Part II.*p < 0.05 for significant differences between cannabis oil and placebo groups. (A) P < 0.05 for significant differences between time points 0 and 30 with in the placebo group. (B) P < 0.05 for significant differences between time points 0 and 30 with in the cannabis oil group. (C) P < 0.05 for significant differences between time points 0 and 90 with in the cannabis oil group. (D) P < 0.05 for Q27 significant differences between time points 30 and 90 with in the cannabis oilgroup. (E) P < 0.05 for significant differences between time points 30 and 90 with in the placebo group.
FIGURE 4.
Graphical summary of veterinary clinical assessment outcomes.
Furthermore, there was a mistake in the caption of Figure 5 as published. Figure 5 had the caption of Figure 6. The corrected caption of Figure 5 appears below.
FIGURE 5.
Biochemical marker levels during the 90-day treatment period. Part I. *p < 0.05 for significant differences between cannabis oil and placebo groups. (A) p < 0.05 for significant differences between time points 0 and 30 within the placebo group. (B) P < 0.05 for significant differences between time points 0 and 30 within the cannabis oil group. (C) p < 0.05 for significant differences between time points 0 and 90 within the cannabis oil group. (D) p < 0.05 for significant differences between time points 30 and 90 within the cannabis oil group. (E) p < 0.05 for significant differences between time points 30 and 90 within the placebo group.
There was also a mistake in the caption of Figure 6 as published. Figure 6 had the caption of Figure 3. The corrected caption of Figure 6 appears below.
The original article has been updated.
Footnotes
Edited and reviewed by: Javier Echeverria, University of Santiago, Chile
Generative AI statement
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.