Skip to main content
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth logoLink to BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
. 2025 Dec 10;26:112. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08454-7

Association of maternal endometriosis with autism spectrum disorder in offspring: a retrospective cohort study

Maho Furukawa 1, Osamu Wada-Hiraike 1,, Yuki Enomoto 1, Saki Tsuchimochi 1, Takayuki Iriyama 1, Yusuke Sasabuchi 2, Hideo Yasunaga 3, Yasushi Hirota 1, Yutaka Osuga 1
PMCID: PMC12866551  PMID: 41372925

Abstract

Background

With the increasing incidence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), various risk factors for ASD have been identified. Among them, maternal immune activation (MIA), which can be triggered by inflammation via elevated proinflammatory cytokines, has recently been reported as a risk factor for ASD in offspring.

Objectives

We assessed the association of maternal endometriosis, a chronic gynecological inflammation that may induce MIA, with ASD in offspring.

Study design

In this retrospective cohort study, we used the data from a large-scale public health insurance database across Japan to identify dyads of mothers and their firstborn children, delivered between January 2005 and May 2022. Mothers with multiple pregnancies were excluded. The proportions of children diagnosed with ASD at 3 years old were compared between eligible mothers with endometriosis and those without a diagnosis of endometriosis prior to delivery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of maternal endometriosis with ASD in children, after adjusting for maternal and peripartum characteristics.

Results

We identified 30,020 eligible dyads of mothers and their firstborn children. Among them, 3,496 mothers had endometriosis. The proportions of ASD in the offspring of the group of mothers without and with endometriosis were 2.7% (720/26,524) and 2.9% (102/3,496), respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed no significant association of maternal endometriosis with ASD in their children (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–1.29).

Conclusion

No significant association of maternal endometriosis with ASD in offspring was detected in this study. These findings suggest children whose mothers have an antepartum history of endometriosis alone may not need to be closely monitored for ASD, and health care providers or people involved with children may need to consider other reported backgrounds related to ASD.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-025-08454-7.

Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder, Endometriosis, Maternal immune activation, Retrospective cohort study

Background

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by two key behavioral impairments: (i) deficits in communication and social interactions, and (ii) restricted, repetitive behaviors, interests, activities, and sensory difficulties [1, 2]. Additionally, ASD can affect a person throughout their life [1]. Owing to changes and improvements in the diagnosis of ASD as well as increased public awareness, the prevalence of ASD has increased in recent years [1, 3]. Thus, the actual number of individuals with ASD may be higher than previously inferred. Early diagnosis and optimal intervention improve outcomes of cognitive ability, language, and adaptive behaviors in individuals with ASD [4, 5, 6].

Hereditary factors may account for 74–93% of ASD cases [3, 7]. Furthermore, the non-genetic factors that are reportedly associated with ASD include advanced parental age, hypertension or abnormal glucose metabolism during pregnancy, preterm birth, low birth weight, comorbidities such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and the use of certain medications during pregnancy [3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Recently, maternal immune activation (MIA), triggered by maternal acute and chronic inflammation, has been highlighted as a potential mechanism in the development of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as ASD [18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. MIA possibly affects the fetal neurodevelopmental aspects associated with the ASD phenotype through the direct action of enhanced maternal proinflammatory cytokines by MIA, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), or the effect of inflammatory cytokines that are released in the placenta and fetus secondary to the enhanced levels of maternal inflammatory cytokines [20, 23, 24].

Endometriosis is a gynecological, chronic inflammatory pelvic disease that affects 5%–10% of women of reproductive age and may cause pain or infertility [25, 26]. Endometriosis-induced inflammation may cause obstetric and neonatal complications, such as preeclampsia and premature birth [27, 28, 29]. Supporting evidence of this association is the finding that high IL-6 levels in the peritoneal fluid or serum of patients with endometriosis have been reported [30, 31, 32]. Given this background, maternal endometriosis may be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as ASD, via MIA. However, studies of the association of maternal endometriosis with ASD in offspring have shown inconsistent results. One study found a positive association of maternal endometriosis with ASD [33], whereas another did not find a significant association [34]. These studies primarily focused on infertility and its treatment and treated endometriosis as a contributing factor to infertility. Furthermore, both were case–control studies, and the number of participants with endometriosis was small.

Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the association of maternal endometriosis with ASD in offspring using data from a large-scale health insurance claims database in Japan.

Materials and Methods

Data Source

This retrospective cohort study used the JMDC Health Insurance Claims Database (JMDC Inc., Tokyo, Japan), which comprises public health insurance claims from multiple health insurers across Japan since 2005 and included data on approximately 17 million individuals as of February 2024 [35]. The insured are the employees of Japanese companies and their family members. Furthermore, it is possible to track individuals even if they are transferred between hospitals or are visiting multiple clinics. The database includes anonymized inpatient and outpatient data on diagnoses, medications, procedures, and findings of medical examinations. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes and original Japanese disease codes were used to record diagnoses in the database, which also includes an anonymous family identification number that enables the linkage of the information of each family member.

Participants

We included firstborns linked to their mothers using family identification numbers from January 2005 to May 2022. We speculated that birth order could be a factor in the timing of ASD diagnosis for the following reasons. First, ongoing clinical management for ASD in a firstborn may be associated with increased medical consultation for subsequent siblings. Second, if a firstborn child shows typical development, any clearly different developmental trajectory in a second or later-born child could lead to earlier medical consultations. Therefore, this study was limited to firstborn children. We excluded children whose (i) data did not start from the year and month of birth, (ii) mothers whose data did not cover their child’s year and month of birth, (iii) mothers with multiple pregnancies (ICD-10 code: O30), and (iv) mothers with data for < 2 years before childbirth. Eligible children were divided into two groups: those whose mothers had been diagnosed with endometriosis (ICD-10 code: N80) within 2 years prior to childbirth (endometriosis group) and those whose mothers were not diagnosed with endometriosis (non-endometriosis group).

Outcomes

We defined the primary outcome as a diagnosis of ASD by the age of 3 years. We used the ICD-10 code for pervasive developmental disorders (F84) to diagnose ASD, except for Rett syndrome (F84.2) [2, 36, 37].

We defined the endpoint as an ASD diagnosis at 3 years of age for the following reasons. In Japan, infants undergo medical checkups at 18 months and at 3 years [38]. A previous study reported that ASD traits typically appear by 24 months [39]. Standardized screening for ASD at 18 and 24 months of age is widely recommended, given that an accurate diagnosis can be reliably made by skilled professionals as early as 18 months of age [40, 41]. Furthermore, high diagnostic stability has been consistently reported for diagnoses rendered between 18 and 36 months of age [40, 42]. Therefore, detection at the 3-year-old medical check-up would facilitate timely care [4, 5, 6].

The secondary outcome was a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; F90.0) at 3 years of age. Similar to ASD, ADHD is a neurodevelopmental disorder that has a possible association with MIA during pregnancy [19, 22, 43, 44].

Variables

In this study, we selected the following variables for adjusting: maternal and infant demographic factors (maternal age at the year and month of birth, child’s sex, and birth year), perinatal complications, delivery methods, low birth weight, and PCOS [14, 15, 16]. Perinatal complications included (i) hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, superimposed preeclampsia, and chronic hypertension), (ii) eclampsia before delivery (antepartum eclampsia and intrapartum eclampsia), (iii) preterm premature rupture of the membranes (preterm PROM), (iv) placenta previa, (v) placental abruption, (vi) threatened preterm delivery, (vii) intrauterine infection, (viii) hyperglycemic disorders of pregnancy (pregestational diabetes mellitus and overt diabetes in pregnancy, and gestational diabetes mellitus), and (ix) preterm delivery (spontaneous preterm delivery, artificial preterm delivery, preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation, and preterm birth after 28 weeks of gestation). The delivery methods included forced delivery using forceps or vacuum, elective cesarean section, and emergency cesarean section. Low birth weight was categorized as extremely low (< 1000 g), very low (1000–1500 g), or low (1500–2500 g). Some of these variables could be considered intermediate factors between endometriosis and ASD. However, the development of ASD from these factors, such as preeclampsia or preterm birth, may be influenced by a combination of hypoxia, oxidative stress and prematurity as well as inflammation of endometriosis [45, 46]. To focus on the potential association of chronic endometriosis-induced maternal inflammation with an ASD diagnosis in offspring, we adjusted those factors in the present study. Details of the specific conditions and corresponding ICD-10 codes or original Japanese disease codes are presented in Supplemental Table 1.

The diagnosis of ASD might depend on the birth year because of the changes in the diagnostic criteria for ASD. Preterm delivery was defined when either the mother or her child had any diagnosis of preterm delivery or birth, respectively. Prematurity due to preterm delivery is associated with neurodevelopmental disorders [9, 13]; however, few cases were reported for preterm delivery before 28 weeks of gestation. Therefore, we did not adjust for gestational age in the present study. Preterm PROM was defined using the ICD-10 codes for both PROM and preterm delivery.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as means with standard deviations. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and proportions. Absolute standardized differences were used to assess the intergroup differences. If the absolute standardized mean difference is less than 0.1, it means well balanced between the groups [47]. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to evaluate the association of maternal endometriosis with the offspring’s outcomes. We excluded intrapartum eclampsia as an independent variable for ASD because of their low prevalence. Moreover, we did not include superimposed preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, antepartum eclampsia, intrapartum eclampsia, and extremely low birth weight as independent variables from the analysis for ADHD for the same reason. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA/SE version 17 (STATA, College Station, TX, USA).

Sensitivity analysis

We performed two sensitivity analyses. First, survival analysis was performed. Children were followed up until a diagnosis of ASD or ADHD at 96 months or until they were lost to follow-up, whichever occurred first. If the observation period was 0 months (owing to the year and month of birth and the timing of change in insurance in the same year and month), we excluded these cases. We compared the time of ASD and ADHD diagnosis between the two groups using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests. We performed Cox regression analyses, adjusting for the same variables as in the multivariable logistic regression, after excluding several variables as follows because the model did not converge: intrapartum eclampsia for ASD, and chronic hypertension, antepartum eclampsia, intrapartum eclampsia and extremely low birth weight for ADHD.

Second, we stratified the children whose mothers had ≧5 years of data prior to childbirth to confirm the validity of the results and thus divided the eligible children into two groups: those whose mothers had been diagnosed with endometriosis within 5 years prior to the birth month and mothers who were not diagnosed with endometriosis by that timepoint. As in the main analysis, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed with a diagnosis of ASD and ADHD up to 3 years of age as the outcome, and survival analyses were performed with an observation period of up to 72 months.

Ethics

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Tokyo (approval number: 10862-(1), approved on 13/06/2018). Informed consent of the participants was deemed unnecessary because data were de-identified. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

Main analysis

We identified 1,572,036 mother–firstborn dyads in the JMDC claims database from January 2005 to May 2022. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 30,020 dyads were included in the main analysis. Of these, 3,496 mothers were diagnosed with endometriosis within 2 years prior to childbirth (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flow diagram of the mother–child dyads included in the study. This diagram illustrates the selection process for the mother–child dyads included in the main analysis (n = 30,020). The exclusions due to insufficient data availability of the mothers and children, or multiple pregnancies are shown. The final dyads were divided into two groups based on whether the mothers were diagnosed with endometriosis within 24 months prior to delivery

Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics of the patients. The mean age of the mothers at birth in the endometriosis group was higher than that in the non-endometriosis group. No intergroup difference was observed in the distribution of the child’s sex and birth year. Diagnoses of placenta previa, threatened preterm delivery, cesarean section (a combination of elective and emergency), and PCOS were more prevalent in the endometriosis group than in the non-endometriosis group.

Table 1.

Baseline maternal and child characteristics

No endometriosis Endometriosis Absolute SMD
(n = 26,524) (n = 3,496)
Maternal age at birth, years, mean (SD) 32.7 4.7 33.9 4.5 0.25
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, n (%) 2687 10 398 11 0.04
Preeclampsia 2337 8.8 351 10 0.04
Gestational hypertension 521 2.0 62 1.8 0.01
Superimposed preeclampsia 33 0.1 4 0.1 0.00
Chronic hypertension 27 0.1 4 0.1 0.00
Eclampsia before delivery, n (%) 18 0.1 1 0.0 0.02
Antepartum eclampsia 6 0.0 0 0.0 0.02
Intrapartum eclampsia 12 0.0 1 0.0 0.01
PROM, n (%) 6044 23 824 24 0.02
Preterm PROM 366 1.4 58 1.7 0.02
Placenta previa, n (%) 1100 4.1 220 6.3 0.10
Placental abruption, n (%) 532 2.0 92 2.6 0.04
Threatened preterm delivery, n (%) 10469 40 1604 46 0.13
Intrauterine infection, n (%) 4752 18 757 22 0.09
PCOS, n (%) 2210 8.3 582 17 0.25
Hyperglycemic disorders in pregnancy, n (%) 5106 19 771 22 0.07
Pregestational diabetes mellitus and overt diabetes in pregnancy 144 0.5 27 0.8 0.03
Gestational diabetes mellitus 4886 18 738 21 0.07
Preterm delivery, n (%) 884 3.3 153 4.4 0.05
Spontaneous preterm delivery 153 0.6 17 0.5 0.01
Artificial preterm delivery 18 0.1 7 0.2 0.04
Preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation 7 0.0 3 0.1 0.03
Preterm birth after 28 weeks of gestation 831 3.1 144 4.1 0.05
Forced delivery (forceps and vacuum), n (%) 989 3.7 148 4.2 0.03
Cesarean section, n (%) 1849 7.0 360 10 0.12
Elective cesarean section 451 1.7 96 2.7 0.07
Emergency cesarean section 774 2.9 146 4.2 0.07
Birth weight, n (%)
 Extremely low birth weight (< 1000 g) 85 0.3 14 0.4 0.01
 Very low birth weight (1000–1499 g) 104 0.4 20 0.6 0.03
 Low birth weight (1500–2499 g) 1539 5.8 230 6.6 0.03
 Child sex (female), n (%) 12791 48 1734 50 0.03
Birth year of the child, n (%)
 2007 148 0.6 20 0.6 0.00
 2008 147 0.6 21 0.6 0.01
 2009 149 0.6 17 0.5 0.01
 2010 199 0.8 20 0.6 0.02
 2011 370 1.4 35 1.0 0.04
 2012 692 2.6 74 2.1 0.03
 2013 941 3.5 113 3.2 0.02
 2014 1258 4.7 163 4.7 0.00
 2015 1827 6.9 241 6.9 0.00
 2016 2032 7.7 272 7.8 0.00
 2017 2553 9.6 329 9.4 0.01
 2018 3061 12 413 12 0.01
 2019 3646 14 467 13 0.01
 2020 3910 15 557 16 0.03
 2021 4017 15 523 15 0.01
 2022 1574 5.9 231 6.6 0.03

PROM premature rupture of membranes, PCOS polycystic ovary syndrome, SD standard deviation, SMD standardized mean difference

Table 2 shows the results of the logistic regression analysis. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, no significant association of maternal endometriosis with ASD (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84–1.29) or ADHD (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.43–1.61) in offspring was observed.

Table 2.

Results of logistic regression analysis

Outcome No endometriosis (n = 26,524) Endometriosis (n = 3,496) Crude Adjusted
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
ASD 720 (2.7%) 102 (2.9%) 1.08 (0.87–1.33) 0.49 1.04 (0.84–1.29) 0.74
ADHD 86 (0.3%) 10 (0.3%) 0.88 (0.46–1.70) 0.71 0.83 (0.43–1.61) 0.58

We did not include intrapartum eclampsia as independent variables for ASD because the number of variables was small and the model did not converge. Moreover, we excluded superimposed preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, antepartum eclampsia, intrapartum eclampsia, and extremely low birth weight as independent variables from the analysis for ADHD

ASD Autism spectrum disorder, ADHD Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval

Sensitivity analyses

During the observation period of 96 months, 1,032 (4.0%) children in the non-endometriosis group and 147 (4.3%) children in the endometriosis group were diagnosed with ASD. The crude incidence rate per 10,000 person-years of ASD was 118 in the non-endometriosis group and 127 in the endometriosis group (Supplemental Table 2). Supplemental Fig.1 shows the Kaplan–Meier curves for ASD. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, maternal endometriosis was not found to be associated with ASD in offspring (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.87–1.23; Supplemental Table 2).

Regarding ADHD, 242 (1.0%) children in the non-endometriosis group and 27 (0.8%) children in the endometriosis group were diagnosed with ADHD. The crude incidence rates per 10,000 person-years for ADHD were 27 and 23 in the non-endometriosis and endometriosis groups, respectively. Supplemental Fig. 2 shows the Kaplan–Meier curve for ADHD. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, maternal endometriosis was not associated with ADHD in offspring (HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55–1.23; Supplemental Table2 ).

We stratified the inclusion of children to those whose mothers had ≧ 5 years of data before childbirth. Thus, a total of 4,402 dyads were included, with 3,546 and 856 dyads in the non-endometriosis and endometriosis groups, respectively (Supplemental Fig. 3). These results were consistent with those of the main analyses (Supplemental Tables 3, 4, and 5 and Supplemental Figs. 4 and 5).

Discussion

Principal findings

In this retrospective cohort study, we used a large-scale health insurance claims database to investigate the association of maternal endometriosis with ASD and ADHD in children. Maternal endometriosis was not associated with ASD or ADHD in offspring.

Results in the Context of What is Known

A few previous studies reported the association of maternal endometriosis with ASD in offspring [33, 34], and these analyses were adjusted for confounders such as maternal race, ethnicity, and education level, which could not be reconciled in the database we used. However, both were case–control studies. One study included 629 ASD cases and 909 controls [33], and the other included 537 ASD cases and 381 controls [34]. The number of participants with endometriosis was small, with 27 ASD cases and 19 controls in one study [33], and 3 ASD cases and 1 control in the other [34]. Also, recall bias may have influenced the findings [33, 34]. In the present study, we primarily focused on the association of maternal endometriosis with ASD in the offspring by using a large-scale database. A report describing an association between maternal endometriosis and ASD in children found that the association disappeared when limited to the first child [33], which is consistent with the results of the present study that included mother–firstborn dyads.

Clinical and research implications

It has been hypothesized that the pathology of ASD is initiated via MIA by enhanced circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, in the mother, placenta, and fetus. These cytokines may cause fetal neuroinflammation through oxidative stress or mitochondrial dysfunction, which may subsequently result in ASD–related behaviors [20, 24]. Elevated serum levels of IL-6 were observed in women with endometriosis [30, 32, 48, 49]. However, several studies have challenged this hypothesis [31, 50]. Regarding the direct effect of maternal IL-6 on the fetus, our study suggests that elevated IL-6 levels in pregnant women with only endometriosis may not be sufficient to induce significant neuroinflammation in the offspring. Furthermore, the levels of IL-6 in pregnant women were higher than those observed in non-pregnant women [51]. Despite the absence of data regarding IL-6 levels in pregnant women with endometriosis, pregnancy itself may have a greater contribution to elevating IL-6 levels than endometriosis alone. On the other hand, indirect effects of uteroplacental inflammation caused by MIA have been suggested [23, 24]. An endometriosis–associated inflammatory response in the placenta or fetus has been suggested to contribute to perinatal complications, such as preeclampsia and preterm birth [29, 5255]. To isolate the effect of endometriosis, we adjusted for baseline characteristics, including these perinatal complications, which might have underestimated the indirect effects in the present study.

Concerning ADHD, the reasons for the lack of association between endometriosis and MIA could be the same as those for ASD.

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of the present study are the use of a large-scale database and adjustment for many baseline characteristics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to focus on the association of maternal endometriosis with ASD and ADHD in children. Nonetheless, this study has several limitations that must be considered. First, no validation studies have been conducted on the diagnosis of endometriosis, ASD, or ADHD. In the main analysis, the prevalence was 13.3% for endometriosis, 2.9% for ASD, and 0.3% for ADHD. In reproductive age women, the prevalence of endometriosis is 5%–10% [25]. The prevalence of ASD and ADHD is 1.0%–1.5% [5658] and approximately 5% [59], respectively. In our study, the prevalence may not have been consistent with that reported in previous studies because we used the outcome as having a diagnosis at least once, which may cause overestimation. Diagnosing ADHD prior to age 3 may be challenging; a previous study reported that the median age of ADHD diagnosis was 7 years [60]. Therefore, ADHD diagnosis at age 3 is likely underestimated. Second, despite using a large-scale database, our study may have had limited statistical power to detect an extremely small effect. However, the minimal difference in the prevalence of ASD between the groups (2.7% vs. 2.9%) and the wide 95% CI (0.84 to 1.29) suggest that even if a true association exists, it is unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Third, the details of endometriosis were not analyzed in this study. Further, the severity of endometriosis was not described in the database. The serum and peritoneal fluid levels of IL-6 in women with endometriosis correlate with the stage of endometriosis [61]. In the present study, there may have been many cases of low-stage endometriosis and, thus, the IL-6 levels were too low to influence neural changes in children. There are different types of endometriosis, including endometrioma and adenomyosis. However, because of missing data, we could not obtain data on the types of endometriosis in all patients. Fourth, we did not include paternal age, for which an association with the diagnosis of ASD in offspring was previously reported [8]. Fifth, data on the method of conception were not included in the database. The association between infertility treatment and assisted reproductive technology with neurodevelopmental disorders remains controversial [34, 6264]. Sixth, we only included the firstborn children. A difference in the incidence of ASD diagnosis between the first and subsequent births has been reported [33]. Lastly, prematurity due to preterm birth is associated with ASD [13]. However, we could not accurately adjust for birth weight and gestational age because of the lack of information in the database and few cases of preterm birth, especially extremely low birth weight.

Conclusions

This retrospective cohort study using a large-scale health insurance database found no significant associations of maternal endometriosis with ASD or ADHD. Thus, these findings suggest that intensive monitoring for ASD or ADHD may not be warranted based solely on the presence of maternal endometriosis, and health care providers or people involved with children may need to consider other reported backgrounds related to ASD or ADHD. However, considering the limitations of this study, further research is necessary to account for birth order and other backgrounds that could not be included.

Supplementary Information

12884_2025_8454_MOESM1_ESM.docx (32.2KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 1. Table S1. ICD-10 codes and original Japanese Disease Codes for variables. Table S2. Incidence rates and hazard ratios of ASD and ADHD in offspring with and without maternal endometriosis. Table S3. Baseline characteristics in the sensitivity analysis of mothers with 5-year data prior to childbirth. Table S4. Results of logistic regression analyses of mothers with 5-year data prior to childbirth. Table S5. Incidence rates and hazard ratios for ASD and ADHD in offspring with and without maternal endometriosis in the subgroup analysis for mothers with 5-year data prior to childbirth.

12884_2025_8454_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (685.1KB, pptx)

Supplementary Material 2. Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier estimates for ASD diagnosis in offspring. Figure S2. Kaplan-Meier estimates for ADHD diagnosis in offspring. Figure S3. Flow diagram of included pairs in the sensitivity analysis. Figure S4. Kaplan-Meier estimates for ASD diagnosis in offspring in sensitivity analysis. Figure S5. Kaplan-Meier estimates for ADHD diagnosis in offspring in sensitivity analysis.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Abbreviations

ASD

Autism spectrum disorder

MIA

Maternal immune activation

PCOS

Polycystic ovary syndrome

IL-6

Interleukin-6

ADHD

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

PROM

Premature rupture of the membranes

Authors’ contributions

MF: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. OWH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. YE and ST: Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing. TI, YH, and YO: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. YS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. HY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (grant number 24FB1001: O.WH., 23FB0101: Y. O., and grant number 23AA2003: H. Y.).

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are anonymized public health insurance data from across Japan provided by a private database company (JMDC Inc.: https://www.jmdc.co.jp/en/inquiry/). Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study and are not publicly available. Researchers interested in using these data may contact the corresponding author and JMDC Inc. to inquire about data access.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Tokyo (approval number: 10862-(1), approved on 13/06/2018). Informed consent was not required because data were de-identified. Our study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Joon P, Kumar A, Parle M. What is autism? Pharmacol Rep. 2021;73(5):1255–64. 10.1007/s43440-021-00244-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Doernberg E, Hollander E. Neurodevelopmental disorders (ASD and ADHD): DSM-5, ICD-10, and ICD-11. CNS Spectr. 2016;21(4):295–9. 10.1017/S1092852916000262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lord C, Elsabbagh M, Baird G, Veenstra-Vanderweele J. Autism spectrum disorder. Lancet. 2018;392(10146):508–20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31129-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Orinstein AJ, Helt M, Troyb E, Tyson KE, Barton ML, Eigsti IM, et al. Intervention for optimal outcome in children and adolescents with a history of autism. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014;35(4):247–56. 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Daniolou S, Pandis N, Znoj H. The efficacy of early interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(17):5100. 10.3390/jcm11175100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tachibana Y, Miyazaki C, Ota E, Mori R, Hwang Y, Kobayashi E, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comprehensive interventions for pre-school children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0186502. 10.1371/journal.pone.0186502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tick B, Bolton P, Happé F, Rutter M, Rijsdijk F. Heritability of autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis of twin studies. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016;57(5):585–95. 10.1111/jcpp.12499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Idring S, Magnusson C, Lundberg M, Ek M, Rai D, Svensson AC, et al. Parental age and the risk of autism spectrum disorders: findings from a Swedish population-based cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(1):107–15. 10.1093/ije/dyt262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guinchat V, Thorsen P, Laurent C, Cans C, Bodeau N, Cohen D. Pre-, peri- and neonatal risk factors for autism. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(3):287–300. 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01325.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang H, László KD, Gissler M, Li F, Zhang J, Yu Y, et al. Maternal hypertensive disorders and neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: a population-based cohort in two Nordic countries. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021;36(5):519–30. 10.1007/s10654-021-00756-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xu G, Jing J, Bowers K, Liu B, Bao W. Maternal diabetes and the risk of autism spectrum disorders in the offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44(4):766–75. 10.1007/s10803-013-1928-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rowland J, Wilson CA. The association between gestational diabetes and ASD and ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5136. 10.1038/s41598-021-84573-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lampi KM, Lehtonen L, Tran PL, Suominen A, Lehti V, Banerjee PN, et al. Risk of autism spectrum disorders in low birth weight and small for gestational age infants. J Pediatr. 2012;161(5):830–6. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.04.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kosidou K, Dalman C, Widman L, Arver S, Lee BK, Magnusson C, et al. Maternal polycystic ovary syndrome and the risk of autism spectrum disorders in the offspring: a population-based nationwide study in Sweden. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21(10):1441–8. 10.1038/mp.2015.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dubey P, Thakur B, Rodriguez S, Cox J, Sanchez S, Fonseca A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between maternal polycystic ovary syndrome and neuropsychiatric disorders in children. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):569. 10.1038/s41398-021-01699-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cesta CE, Öberg AS, Ibrahimson A, Yusuf I, Larsson H, Almqvist C, et al. Maternal polycystic ovary syndrome and risk of neuropsychiatric disorders in offspring: prenatal androgen exposure or genetic confounding? Psychol Med. 2020;50(4):616–24. 10.1017/S0033291719000424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ornoy A, Weinstein-Fudim L, Ergaz Z. Prenatal factors associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Reprod Toxicol. 2015;56:155–69. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Estes ML, McAllister AK. Maternal immune activation: implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Science. 2016;353(6301):772–7. 10.1126/science.aag3194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Han VX, Patel S, Jones HF, Nielsen TC, Mohammad SS, Hofer MJ, et al. Maternal acute and chronic inflammation in pregnancy is associated with common neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):71. 10.1038/s41398-021-01198-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Majerczyk D, Ayad EG, Brewton KL, Saing P, Hart PC. Systemic maternal inflammation promotes ASD via IL-6 and IFN-γ. Biosci Rep. 2022;42(11):BSR20220713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Meltzer A, Van de Water J. The role of the immune system in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;42(1):284-298. 10.1038/npp.2016.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Knuesel I, Chicha L, Britschgi M, Schobel SA, Bodmer M, Hellings JA, et al. Maternal immune activation and abnormal brain development across CNS disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(11):643–60. 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ravaccia D, Ghafourian T. Critical role of the maternal immune system in the pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder. Biomedicines. 2020;8(12).10.3390/biomedicines8120557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Zawadzka A, Cieślik M, Adamczyk A. The role of maternal immune activation in the pathogenesis of autism: a review of the evidence, proposed mechanisms and implications for treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21).10.3390/ijms222111516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA. Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. Lancet. 2021;397(10276):839–52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00389-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Giudice LC. Clinical practice. Endometriosis N Engl J Med. 2010;362(25):2389–98. 10.1056/NEJMcp1000274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Berlac JF, Hartwell D, Skovlund CW, Langhoff-Roos J, Lidegaard Ø. Endometriosis increases the risk of obstetrical and neonatal complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(6):751–60. 10.1111/aogs.13111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Farland LV, Prescott J, Sasamoto N, Tobias DK, Gaskins AJ, Stuart JJ, et al. Endometriosis and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(3):527–36. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Breintoft K, Pinnerup R, Henriksen TB, Rytter D, Uldbjerg N, Forman A, et al. Endometriosis and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4).10.3390/jcm10040667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Machairiotis N, Vasilakaki S, Thomakos N. Inflammatory mediators and pain in endometriosis: a systematic review. Biomedicines. 2021;9(1).10.3390/biomedicines9010054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.De Andrade VT, Nácul AP, Dos Santos BR, Lecke SB, Spritzer PM, Morsch DM. Circulating and peritoneal fluid interleukin-6 levels and gene expression in pelvic endometriosis. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14(3):2317–22. 10.3892/etm.2017.4794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sikora J, Smycz-Kubańska M, Mielczarek-Palacz A, Bednarek I, Kondera-Anasz Z. The involvement of multifunctional TGF-β and related cytokines in pathogenesis of endometriosis. Immunol Lett. 2018;201:31–7. 10.1016/j.imlet.2018.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schieve LA, Drews-Botsch C, Harris S, Newschaffer C, Daniels J, DiGuiseppi C, et al. Maternal and paternal infertility disorders and treatments and autism spectrum disorder: findings from the study to explore early development. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47(12):3994–4005. 10.1007/s10803-017-3283-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lyall K, Baker A, Hertz-Picciotto I, Walker CK. Infertility and its treatments in association with autism spectrum disorders: a review and results from the CHARGE study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(8):3715–34. 10.3390/ijerph10083715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.JMDC Real World. https://www.eng.phm-jmdc.com/. Accessed 10 Sept 2025.
  • 36.King BH, Navot N, Bernier R, Webb SJ. Update on diagnostic classification in autism. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(2):105–9. 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sharma SR, Gonda X, Tarazi FI. Autism spectrum disorder: classification, diagnosis and therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;190:91–104. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Children and Families Agency. The 2nd Meeting of the Council on Children and Families, Subcommittee on Growth and Medical Care. 2023. Medical checkups for infants and toddlers. https://www.cfa.go.jp/assets/contents/node/basic_page/field_ref_resources/ce28e632-7504-4f83-86e7-7e0706090e3f/5a476375/20231122_councils_shingikai_seiiku_iryou_tWs1V94m_07.pdf. Accessed 16 April 2024.
  • 39.Landa RJ, Holman KC, Garrett-Mayer E. Social and communication development in toddlers with early and later diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(7):853–64. 10.1001/archpsyc.64.7.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hyman SL, Levy SE, Myers SM. Identification, evaluation, and management of children with autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics. 2020. 10.1542/peds.2019-3447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zwaigenbaum L, Bryson SE, Brian J, Smith IM, Roberts W, Szatmari P, et al. Stability of diagnostic assessment for autism spectrum disorder between 18 and 36 months in a high-risk cohort. Autism Res. 2016;9(7):790–800. 10.1002/aur.1585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zwaigenbaum L, Bauman ML, Fein D, Pierce K, Buie T, Davis PA, et al. Early screening of autism spectrum disorder: recommendations for practice and research. Pediatrics. 2015;136(Suppl 1):S41. 10.1542/peds.2014-3667D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Instanes JT, Halmøy A, Engeland A, Haavik J, Furu K, Klungsøyr K. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring of mothers with inflammatory and immune system diseases. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;81(5):452–9. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Han VX, Patel S, Jones HF, Dale RC. Maternal immune activation and neuroinflammation in human neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(9):564–79. 10.1038/s41582-021-00530-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dachew BA, Mamun A, Maravilla JC, Alati R. Pre-eclampsia and the risk of autism-spectrum disorder in offspring: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;212(3):142–7. 10.1192/bjp.2017.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gumusoglu SB, Chilukuri ASS, Santillan DA, Santillan MK, Stevens HE. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of prenatal preeclampsia exposure. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43(4):253–68. 10.1016/j.tins.2020.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424. 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Martínez S, Garrido N, Coperias JL, Pardo F, Desco J, García-Velasco JA, et al. Serum interleukin-6 levels are elevated in women with minimal–mild endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(3):836–42. 10.1093/humrep/del419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kashanian M, Sariri E, Vahdat M, Ahmari M, Moradi Y, Sheikhansari N. A comparison between serum levels of interleukin-6 and CA125 in patients with endometriosis and normal women. Med J Islamic Repub Iran. 2015;29:1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Somigliana E, Viganò P, Tirelli AS, Felicetta I, Torresani E, Vignali M, et al. Use of the concomitant serum dosage of CA 125, CA 19–9 and interleukin-6 to detect the presence of endometriosis. Results from a series of reproductive age women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign gynaecological conditions. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(8):1871–6. 10.1093/humrep/deh312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fu Y, Tang L, Hu M, Xiang Z, Hu Y. Changes of serum interleukin-6 in healthy pregnant women and establishment of relevant reference intervals. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;502:116–9. 10.1016/j.cca.2019.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Petraglia F, Arcuri F, de Ziegler D, Chapron C. Inflammation: a link between endometriosis and preterm birth. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(1):36–40. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Volodarsky-Perel A, Ton Nu TN, Mashiach R, Berkowitz E, Balayla J, Machado-Gedeon A, et al. The effect of endometriosis on placental histopathology and perinatal outcome in singleton live births resulting from IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45(4):754–61. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Michalczyk M, Celewicz A, Celewicz M, Woźniakowska-Gondek P, Rzepka R. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Mediators Inflamm. 2020;2020:3864941. 10.1155/2020/3864941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jung E, Romero R, Yeo L, Diaz-Primera R, Marin-Concha J, Para R, et al. The fetal inflammatory response syndrome: the origins of a concept, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and obstetrical implications. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;25(4):101146. 10.1016/j.siny.2020.101146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jo H, Schieve LA, Rice CE, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Tian LH, Blumberg SJ, et al. Age at autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis by race, ethnicity, and primary household language among children with special health care needs, United States, 2009–2010. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(8):1687–97. 10.1007/s10995-015-1683-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lyall K, Croen L, Daniels J, Fallin MD, Ladd-Acosta C, Lee BK, et al. The changing epidemiology of autism spectrum disorders. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:81–102. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Saito M, Hirota T, Sakamoto Y, Adachi M, Takahashi M, Osato-Kaneda A, et al. Prevalence and cumulative incidence of autism spectrum disorders and the patterns of co-occurring neurodevelopmental disorders in a total population sample of 5-year-old children. Mol Autism. 2020;11(1):35. 10.1186/s13229-020-00342-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sayal K, Prasad V, Daley D, Ford T, Coghill D. Adhd in children and young people: prevalence, care pathways, and service provision. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(2):175–86. 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30167-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Visser SN, Zablotsky B, Holbrook JR, Danielson ML, Bitsko RH. Diagnostic experiences of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2015;81:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jiang J, Jiang Z, Xue M. Serum and peritoneal fluid levels of interleukin-6 and interleukin-37 as biomarkers for endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(7):571–5. 10.1080/09513590.2018.1554034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Andreadou MT, Katsaras GN, Talimtzi P, Doxani C, Zintzaras E, Stefanidis I. Association of assisted reproductive technology with autism spectrum disorder in the offspring: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180(9):2741–55. 10.1007/s00431-021-04187-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Djuwantono T, Aviani JK, Permadi W, Achmad TH, Halim D. Risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children born from different ART treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurodev Disord. 2020;12(1):33. 10.1186/s11689-020-09347-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu L, Gao J, He X, Cai Y, Wang L, Fan X. Association between assisted reproductive technology and the risk of autism spectrum disorders in the offspring: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46207. 10.1038/srep46207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12884_2025_8454_MOESM1_ESM.docx (32.2KB, docx)

Supplementary Material 1. Table S1. ICD-10 codes and original Japanese Disease Codes for variables. Table S2. Incidence rates and hazard ratios of ASD and ADHD in offspring with and without maternal endometriosis. Table S3. Baseline characteristics in the sensitivity analysis of mothers with 5-year data prior to childbirth. Table S4. Results of logistic regression analyses of mothers with 5-year data prior to childbirth. Table S5. Incidence rates and hazard ratios for ASD and ADHD in offspring with and without maternal endometriosis in the subgroup analysis for mothers with 5-year data prior to childbirth.

12884_2025_8454_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (685.1KB, pptx)

Supplementary Material 2. Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier estimates for ASD diagnosis in offspring. Figure S2. Kaplan-Meier estimates for ADHD diagnosis in offspring. Figure S3. Flow diagram of included pairs in the sensitivity analysis. Figure S4. Kaplan-Meier estimates for ASD diagnosis in offspring in sensitivity analysis. Figure S5. Kaplan-Meier estimates for ADHD diagnosis in offspring in sensitivity analysis.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are anonymized public health insurance data from across Japan provided by a private database company (JMDC Inc.: https://www.jmdc.co.jp/en/inquiry/). Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study and are not publicly available. Researchers interested in using these data may contact the corresponding author and JMDC Inc. to inquire about data access.


Articles from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES