Abstract
CD43 is a heavily glycosylated transmembrane molecule that plays critical roles in leukocyte activation and adhesion. Previously, only hematopoietic cells were thought to normally express CD43. However, our immunohistochemical analysis of normal human testes demonstrates that the N-terminal domain of CD43 is expressed in the cytoplasm of Sertoli and Leydig cells while the C-terminal domain is expressed separately in the nucleus of Sertoli and germ cells. The observation that normal testicular cells express CD43 is entirely novel and indicates that testes function is controlled in ways not previously imagined. In order to begin to identify these CD43-dependent functions, CD43 expression was knocked down in the human germ cell line TCam-2. This knockdown changed the expression of both Transition Protein 1 and Acrosin consistent with spermatid maturation having been driven forward. In addition, down-regulation of CD43 in the mouse Leydig cell line MLTC-1 significantly induced its secretion of estradiol, testosterone and progesterone. Based on these data we propose that CD43 actively inhibits testicular function and its aberrant over-expression may contribute to male infertility. Therapeutics that induce such over-expression may represent a means of effecting male contraception.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-025-01410-2.
Keywords: CD43, Leukosialin, Sialophorin, Testes Inhibition, Sertoli Cells, Leydig Cells, Germ Cells, Knock-down, Transition Protein 1, Acrosin, Estradiol, Testosterone, Progesterone
Introduction
CD43 is a type-Ia transmembrane molecule critical to leukocyte activation and adhesion [1–3]. The N-terminal extracellular region is a rod-like structure of 235 amino acids that is heavily glycosylated and extends 45 nm from the cell surface [4–6]. The transmembrane region comprises 23 amino acids and the intracellular region of 123 amino acids anchors the protein to the cytoskeleton by binding actin, ezrin, and moesin [4, 5, 7, 8].
CD43 has been described as a Janus molecule after the Roman god with two faces [2]. This analogy reflects the finding that CD43 can perform diametrically opposite functions. First, depending upon how it is engaged at the cell surface, CD43 can either induce or protect against leukocyte apoptosis [9–13]. Second, depending upon the status of leukocyte activation, CD43 can act either as an anti-adhesion barrier molecule or a pro-adhesion receptor [13–21].
While leukocytes are at rest, the length, bulk and strong negative charge of the extracellular domain of CD43 combine to inhibit adhesion and maintain leukocytes in the circulation [14–17]. During leukocyte activation, expression of CD43 is reduced by proteolysis and repression of its gene [22–28]. In addition, CD43 is excluded from foci of cell–cell contact [7, 16, 29–31]. Together, this down-regulation and redistribution of CD43 facilitate intercellular interaction effected by other leukocyte molecules such as the β2 integrins [29]. Furthermore, changes in glycosylation of the extracellular region allow the CD43 that remains at the cell surface to act as a pro-adhesive counter receptor for galectin-1, ICAM-1, E-selectin, sialoadhesin and MHC Class I [13, 16, 18–21, 30, 32, 33].
During leukocyte activation, cleavage of the extracellular domain triggers subsequent cleavage of the intracellular domain and its translocation to the nucleus where it protects against apoptosis and drives proliferation by binding β-catenin [22, 26, 34, 35]. In addition, the intracellular domain mediates activation signals by binding tyrosine kinases Fyn and Lck and the serine/threonine kinase STANK [36–39]. Activation signals transduced by CD43 can lead to phosphorylation of Shc, Syk, Lyn, Vav, PLCγ2, SLP-76, CD3ζ, PKM2, Bad and STAT3 [40–44]. These events result in activation of Lck, Fyn, Src, PI3 K, p38, MAPK and PKC, repression of the Ras inhibitor Cbl and translocation of ERK2 and ERK5 into the nucleus [43–48]. Ultimately the intracellular signaling cascades mediated by CD43 induce DNA-binding of AP-1, CREB, NFAT and NF-kB and increased expression of IL2, IL4, IL4R, IFNγ, IFNγR, CD69, CD40-L, c-MYC and CyclinD1 [34, 43, 48–50].
Historically, CD43 expression was reported to be restricted to leukocytes and platelets [1–3]. However, we and others have shown that CD43 is also expressed in lung, cervix, breast, colon and salivary gland cancers where it drives malignant progression [51–61]. During the course of an immunohistochemical screen of additional cancers we found malignant testicular tissue also expressed CD43. However, unexpectedly, we also found CD43 expression by apparently normal adjacent tissue. Cancer can change the gene expression profile of nearby normal tissue [62–64]. Consequently, we analyzed entirely normal testis tissue that had been resected from trauma victims. This tissue was also CD43-positive. The observation that normal human testes express CD43 is entirely novel and indicates that testicular function is controlled in ways previously unknown.
Methods
Patient material
A retrospective search was conducted of the de-identified files of the Gundersen Foundation BioBank and the Department of Pathology at Gundersen Medical Center, La Crosse, WI. Five cases of testicular cancer and three cases of accidental trauma to normal testis tissue were identified. Paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tissue representing each type of case was sectioned, stained with haematoxylin and eosin and the histological diagnosis verified. All file searches and subsequent experimental procedures were approved by the Human Subjects Committee of Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA.
Immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks containing human testes tissue were serially sectioned at 4 μm and dried overnight on Colorfrost Plus microscope slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Next, sample slides were deparaffinised by a 60-min incubation at 60 °C followed by four changes of xylene, three changes of 100% ethanol, two changes of 95% ethanol and storage in tap water. One slide from each block was stained with haematoxylin and eosin Y. The remaining slides were subjected to a 20-min incubation at 90–100 °C in the presence of Epitope Retrieval Solution, pH 9 (Dako North America, Inc., Carpinteria, CA, USA). Next, the slides were rocked for 5 min at room temperature with tissue covered by the peroxidase blocking reagent of the EnVision System-HRP (DAB) (Dako North America, Inc.). A rocking incubation was then performed at room temperature for 30 min with Surfact-Amps X-100 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). One slide from each block was rocked for 45 min at room temperature with either an IgG non-immune rabbit or mouse antibody diluted as recommended by the manufacturer (Epitomics, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA). One slide from each block was identically incubated with either a 1: 2400 dilution of the rabbit polyclonal antibody SSGZ or a 1: 100 dilution of the mouse monoclonal antibody L10 that specifically recognize the C and N termini of CD43, respectively [60, 65]. Serial rocking incubations were next performed at room temperature for 30 min with labelled polymer-HRP anti-rabbit or anti-mouse, twice for 5 min with Wash Buffer and 5 min with DAB Chromogen (Dako North America, Inc.). Counterstaining was accomplished by dipping the slides in haematoxylin, rinsing with tap water, dipping in 1% glacial acetic acid, rinsing again in tap water and then dipping in 1% ammonium hydroxide. Rinsing in 100% ethanol then xylene dehydrated the tissue that was finally protected by glass coverslips mounted with Permount (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Immunohistochemical analysis of the mouse Leydig cell line TM3 was undertaken by growing the cells on cell culture chamber slides and evaluating CD43 expression in the same way as the mouse monoclonal L10 but using the mouse monoclonal antibody DF-T1 that recognizes the N-terminal domain of mouse CD43 (GeneTex, Inc., Irvine, CA).
Cell culture
The human germ cell line TCam-2 was kindly provided by Dr. Sohei Kitazawa (Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan [66, 67]. They were cultured in RMPI1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The mouse Leydig cell lines TM3 (CRL-1714™) and MLTC-1 (CRL-2065™) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and grown according to their specifications (Manassas, VA, USA) [68, 69]. The growth medium for TCam-2 and MLTC-1 cells stably expressing shRNA was supplemented with 0.6 μg/ml and 6.0 μg/ml puromycin, respectively. All cultures were grown in a tissue culture incubator that maintained a humidified atmosphere of 5% carbon dioxide at 37 °C.
Generation of cell lines stably expressing shRNA
The control cell line TCam-43(+) was generated by transfection of the human germ cell line TCam-2 with the linearized plasmid pRFP-C-RS expressing shRNA with the ineffective target sequence GCACUACCAGAAGCUAACUCAGAUAGUACU (OriGene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD). The CD43-targeting cell line TCam-43(-) was generated by transfection of TCam-2 with a mixture of four linearized pRFP-C-RS plasmids expressing shRNA binding human CD43 mRNA at the coding-strand sequences ACACCGUGACAGGUGGAACCAUAACAACG, ACGCUCACCACUUUCUUUGGCAGACGGAA, GAGCCAACAACCUACCAGGAAGUUUCCAU and UGGCAACUGACUCUCUGGAGACCUCCACU. Stable expression of the control and CD43-targeting plasmids was selected with 0.6 μg/ml puromycin. The mouse Leydig cell line MLTC-1 was transfected with a linearized pRS plasmid expressing a non-effective shRNA cassette with the target coding-strand sequence GCACUACCAGAAGCUAACUCAGAUAGUACU (OriGene Technologies, Inc.). Stable expression of this plasmid was selected by 6.0 μg/ml purocmycin to generate the cell line MLTC-43(+). MLTC-1 was also transfected with a mixture of four pRS plasmids expressing shRNA targeting mouse CD43 mRNA at the coding-strand sequences CUCUGUGGCUACAACAGUAAGCUCCAAGA, CAUAUCACAGCUCCAAGUACCUCUGAAGC, CAACUUCUGACGGUCCACAAGCCAAAGAU and CACAGCAACCAGUUCUGUGGAGAGUUCCA (OriGene Technologies, Inc.). Stable expression of these plasmids was selected by 6.0 μg/ml puromycin to generate MLTC-43(-).
Enzyme linked immunosorbant assays
Cultures of the daughter cell lines MLTC-43(+) and MLTC-43(-) were established, harvested by trypsinization and resuspended in 50 ml of growth medium. The number of cells per ml was determined by counting on a hemocytometer and 1 × 106 of each line was seeded separately in 30 ml of identical growth medium. After 24 h the growth medium was harvested, cleared by centrifugation and estradiol, testosterone and progesterone levels measured by the clinical laboratory of Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI using enzyme linked immunosorbant assays (ELISA). This laboratory is certified by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA).
Results
CD43 is expressed in normal human testes
During an immunohistological screen of testicular cancers we observed CD43 expression not only by malignant cells but also by apparently normal cells. In order to confirm CD43 expression in normal human testes we analyzed non-malignant tissue that had been resected from patients who had suffered accidental trauma (Fig. 1). This analysis demonstrates that the N-terminus of CD43 is expressed in the cytoplasm of normal Sertoli and Leydig cells while the C-terminus is expressed in the nucleus of normal Sertoli cells, spermatogonia and pachytene spermatocytes but absent from spermatids. Therefore, as germ cells differentiate, CD43 appears to be progressively down-regulated. Also, since the patterns of N and C terminal expression do not overlap, these domains seem to exist in testes as separate entities analogous to what occurs during normal leukocyte activation and breast cancer [22, 26, 34, 35, 61]. Further analysis indicates that testicular CD43 is found in spherical cytoplasmic and punctate nuclear structures (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.
CD43 expression in normal human testis. Immunohistochemistry using antibodies L10 and SSGZ that bind, respectively, the N and C terminus of CD43 [60, 65]. Leydig cells (Ly), Sertoli cells (Sr), spermatids (ST) pachytene spermatocytes (PS), spermatogonia (Sp) and myoid cells (My) are annotated
Fig. 2.
Cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of CD43. Immunohistochemistry using antibodies L10 and SSGZ that bind, respectively, the N and C terminus of CD43 [60, 65]. Pachytene spermatocytes (PS) and increasingly mature spermatids (STa-c) are annotated
CD43 inhibits human germ cell differentiation
In order to begin to determine the function of CD43 in the testis we generated two daughter lines from the human germ cell line TCam-2 [66, 67]. The first daughter, named TCam-43(+), stably expresses a scrambled ineffective shRNA and the second, named TCam-43(-), stably expresses four shRNAs complementary to different regions of CD43 mRNA (OriGene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD). Western blotting demonstrated that CD43 expression was effectively knocked-down in TCam-43(-) compared to TCam-43(+) (Fig. 3). This down-regulation mimics CD43 repression observed during germ cell differentiation in vivo (Figs. 2 and 3). CD43 repression appears a driver of germ cell differentiation as it causes an increase in the molecular weight of Transition Protein 1 (TNP1) and changes in Acrosin expression (Fig. 3). The increase in TNP1 molecular weight is consistent with CD43 repression inducing post-translational modifications such as serine phosphorylation, arginine or lysine methylation and/or lysine acetylation. These modifications target TNP1 for complete replacement with protamines that allow formation of highly condensed chromatin in mature sperm [70–74]. Changes in Acrosin expression include a shift to a lower molecular weight form consistent with the processing of Preproacrosin to Proacrosin and a shift from cytoplasmic to nuclear expression consistent with translocation from the golgi apparatus to the acrosome cap of the mature sperm nucleus [75–77].
Fig. 3.
CD43 repression drives molecular events characteristic of germ cell differentiation. The human germ cell line TCam-2 was transfected with a linearized plasmid expressing a non-effective shRNA cassette (OriGene Technologies, Inc.). Stable expression of this plasmid was selected by purocmycin to generate the cell line TCam-43(+). TCam-2 was also transfected with a mixture of four plasmids expressing shRNA targeting human CD43 mRNA at 4 separate coding-strand sequences (OriGene Technologies, Inc.). Stable expression of these plasmids was selected by puromycin to generate TCam-43(-). Upper Panels: Total protein extracts were prepared from TCam-43(+) and TCam-43(-) and subjected to western blotting using the anti-CD43 antibody SSGZ [60], the anti-TNP1 antibody LS-C81760 (LifeSpan BioSciences, Inc., Seattle, WA) and the anti-Acrosin antibody ab125362 (Abcam, Inc., Cambridge, MA). The two proteins detected with anti-Acrosin are consistent with Preproacrosin (PP.Acrosin) and Proacrosin (P.Acrosin). Lower Panels: Cytoplasmic and nuclear protein extracts were prepared separately and analyzed with anti-Acrosin as above. Antibodies to Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and TATA-binding protein (TBP) were used to control for gel loading. Uncropped western blot images are presented in Supplementary file 1
CD43 inhibits hormone secretion from mouse Leydig cells
Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrates that CD43 is expressed in human testicular cells in vivo (Figs. 2 and 3). Analysis of TCam-2 demonstrates this expression is mimicked in a human germ cell line where it inhibits differentiation (Fig. 3). Next we sought to determine if testicular CD43 expression is evolutionarily conserved. This we demonstrated by immunohistochemical analysis of the mouse Leydig cell line TM3 (Fig. 4) [68]. Mimicking human Leydig cells in vivo, the N-terminal domain of TM3 CD43 is expressed in the cytoplasm and in vesicle-like structures.
Fig. 4.
The N-terminus of CD43 is expressed in the cytoplasm of mouse Leydig cells. The mouse Leydig cell line TM3 was grown on cell culture chamber slides then subjected to immunohistochemical analysis using a non-immune IgG control antibody or the mouse monoclonal antibody DF-T1 that recognizes the N-terminal domain of mouse CD43 (GeneTex, Inc., Irvine, CA) [78, 79]
In order to begin to determine the function of CD43 in mouse Leydig cells we generated two daughter lines from the mouse Leydig cell line MLTC-1 [69]. The first daughter, named MLTC-43(+), stably expresses a scrambled ineffective shRNA and the second, named MLTC-43(-), stably expresses four shRNAs complementary to different regions of mature CD43 mRNA (OriGene Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD). When the culture media conditioned by these daughter lines was analyzed, CD43 repression was found to induce estradiol, testosterone and progesterone secretion by 32%, 60% and 53%, respectively (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
CD43 repression induces steroid hormone secretion from mouse Leydig cells. Actively proliferating cultures of MLTC-43(+) and MLTC-43(-) were established, harvested and 1 × 106 of each seeded separately in 30 ml of identical growth medium. After 24 h the growth medium was harvested, cleared by centrifugation and estradiol, testosterone and progesterone levels measured by ELISA (n = 3)
Discussion
Immunohistochemical analysis of the human testis demonstrates that the N-terminal domain of CD43 is expressed in the cytoplasm of Sertoli and Leydig cells while the C-terminal domain is expressed separately in the nucleus of Sertoli and germ cells (Figs. 1 and 2). The mechanisms by which these CD43 moieties are generated are unknown. At the RNA level possible mechanisms include the use of alternative transcription initiation sites [80–82], various forms of RNA editing [83–92], differential splicing [93–99] and/or the utilization of alternative polyadenylation signals [100–102]. At the protein level differential expression of the N and C terminals of CD43 could be caused by the use of alternative translation initiation and termination signals [103–106] and/or proteolytic cleavage events [22, 25, 26, 34, 35, 107–112]. In addition, like leukocyte CD43, testicular function of CD43 could be controlled by differential glycosylation [13, 16, 17, 30, 32, 33, 112–120], sumoylation [22, 121, 122] and/or subcellular localization [22, 123–125].
The N-terminal domain of CD43 is expressed in punctate structures within the cytoplasm of Sertoli and Leydig cells while the C-terminal domain is expressed in punctate structures within the nucleus of Sertoli and germ cells (Fig. 1). In leukocytes CD43 can localize to exosomes, endosomes, microvesicles, vacuoles and PML nuclear bodies [22, 123–125]. Furthermore, breast cancer cells secrete CD43 in exosomes [64]. Similar entities likely represent the punctate structures that harbor CD43 in testicular cells. The functional role played by CD43 in these structures remains to be determined.
The function of Leydig cells is controlled in large part by luteinizing hormone (LH), an intrinsic circadian clock and crosstalk secretions with Sertoli and germ cells [126–146]. Major control of Sertoli cell function is exerted by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and crosstalk secretions with Leydig and germ cells [142–163]. Germ cell differentiation is dependent upon crosstalk secretions with Leydig and Sertoli cells and can be mimicked in vitro by the combined action of epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF-4), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4) [160–172]. With regard to the endocrine, paracrine and circadian control of testicular CD43 gene expression, it is important to note that the nucleotide sequences of the promoter regions of the human and mouse CD43 genes are evolutionally conserved and both contain elements that could confer circadian transcription by binding CLOCK:BMAL1 and members of the REV-ERB and ROR nuclear receptor families (Fig. 6) [173–183]. In addition, it is intriguing that in both the mouse and human genome the CD43 gene overlaps or is closely linked with the genes encoding epididymis secretory sperm binding protein Li 90n and zymogen granule protein 16 implicated in sperm capacitation [184–190].
Fig. 6.
Evolutionary conservation of the human and mouse CD43 gene promoters. Nucleotide sequences of the proximal promoter regions of the human and mouse CD43 genes. The most 5’ major transcription initiation site for each gene is marked with a vertical arrow [191, 192]. The know locations of binding by Sp1, MeCP2 (Me), Purα and hnRNP-K in the human gene and sequences that conform to their consensus binding sites in the mouse gene are indicated by filled ovals [27, 28, 193–196]. Closely spaced repeats of E-box and E-box-like (E’) elements that potentially bind the CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimer to effect circadian transcription are indicated by blue text [173, 174]. Adjacent CT-rich elements conferring robust binding of CLOCK:BMAL1 are indicated by pink text [175]. RORE boxes that potentially mediate circadian transcription by binding members of the REV-ERB and ROR nuclear receptor families are indicated in red text [176–183]
CD43 expression represents new biology for the human testes with potential implications for the development of new approaches to the treatment of male infertility. In about one third of cases the etiology of male infertility remains unknown and is termed idiopathic male infertility [197]. Despite the fact that these men have no history of diseases affecting fertility and show normal findings in physical examinations and endocrine, genetic and biochemical laboratory testing, their semen analysis often reveals abnormal semen parameters. In addition, patients with idiopathic male infertility often exhibit germ cell aplasia or Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS) [198–201]. This condition is characterized by severely reduced or absent spermatogenesis despite the presence of both Sertoli and Leydig cells. It will be of interest to determine if idiopathic male infertility is characterized by abnormal testicular expression of CD43. If this proves to be the case, correction of such abnormal expression would represent a novel therapeutic strategy. Conversely, drugs causing a pattern of CD43 expression mimicking that in idiopathic male infertility would represent a novel means of male contraception.
Semen analysis is the test of choice for assessing the male partner in an infertile couple [202]. However, a major limitation of semen analysis is its emphasis on sperm evaluation over the characterization of seminal plasma that represents 95% of the ejaculate [203]. Seminal plasma is constituted by secretions derived from the testes, epididymis, seminal vesicles and the prostate as well as the bulbouretheral and periurethral glands [203]. Analysis of human seminal plasma has begun to yield biomarkers for male fertility and infertility [203–216]. Most proteins in seminal plasma bind to the sperm surface through exosomes where they modulate sperm function, interaction with the female reproductive tract and finally fertilization [203, 217–231]. CD43 has been found in exosomes secreted by breast cancer endothelium [64]. In addition, the N-terminal domain of leukocyte CD43 can be shed into blood plasma where it is know as galactoglycoprotein [107]. These findings indicate that CD43 moieties likely form constituents of seminal plasma and alterations in their expression could represent noninvasive biomarkers of male infertility. In this regard it is also important to note that male mice where the CD43 gene has been knocked-out are fertile [232]. Consequently, male infertility is likely to be characterized by the abnormal presence not absence of CD43.
Conclusions
We report for the first time that CD43 is expressed in normal human testes. During germ cell differentiation CD43 is down-regulated driving changes in the expression of both Transition Protein 1 and Acrosin consistent with spermatid maturation. In addition, down-regulation of CD43 in Leydig cells induces secretion of steroid hormones. The exact molecular mechanisms by which CD43 effects these changes in germ and Leydig cells remains to be determined. Nevertheless, based on our current data, we tender the hypotheses that CD43 actively inhibits testicular function, its aberrant expression may contribute to male infertility and manipulation of its expression may represent new means of treatment and contraception. In addition, specific patterns of CD43 expression in the seminal plasma could predict the success of conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Embryo transfer during assisted reproduction is significantly improved by exposure to seminal plasma [233, 234]. Consequently, targeting molecular defects in seminal plasma CD43 might have therapeutic benefit.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Authors’ contributions
C.S.S. performed the research, wrote the main manuscript and prepared all the figures. Q.F. performed the research. Both authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
The funds for the reported research were provide by Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Archived de-identified human tissue was analyzed by immunohistochemistry as approved by the human ethics committee of Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Remold-O’Donnell E, Rosen FS. Sialophorin (CD43) and the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Immunodefic Rev. 1990;2:151–74. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2223062. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ostberg JR, Barth RK, Frelinger JG. The Roman god Janus: A paradigm for the function of CD43. Immunol Today. 1998;19:546–50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9864944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rosenstein Y, Santana A, Pedraza-Alva G. CD43, a molecule with multiple functions. Immunol Res. 1999;20:89–99. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10580634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pallant A, Ezkenazi A, Mattei M-G, Fournier REK, Carlsson SR, Fukuda M, Frelinger JG. Characterization of cDNAs encoding human leukosialin and localization of the leukosialin gene to chromosome 16. Proc NatlAcad Sci USA. 1989;86:1328–32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2521952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shelley CS, Remold-O’Donnell E, Davis AE III, Bruns GAP, Rosen FS, Carroll MC, Whitehead AS. Molecular characterization of sialophorin (CD43), the lymphocyte surface sialoglycoprotein defective in Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:2819–28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2784859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cyster JG, Shotton DM, Williams AF. The dimensions of the T-lymphocyte glycoprotein leukosialin and identification of linear protein epitopes that can be modified by glycosylation. EMBO J. 1991;10:893–902. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1706994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Serrador JM, Nieto M, Alonso-Lebrero JL, del Pozo MA, Calvo J, Furthmayr H, Schwartz-Albiez, R, Lozano F, González-Amaro R, Sánchez-Mateos P, Sánchez-Madrid, F. CD43 interacts with moesin and ezrin and regulates its redistribution to the uropods of T lymphocytes at the cell-cell contacts. Blood. 1998;91:4632–4644. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9616160. [PubMed]
- 8.Yonemura S, Hirao M, Doi Y, Takahashi N, Kondo T, Tsukita S, Tsukita S. Ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins bind to the positively charged amino acid cluster in the juxtamembrane cytoplasmic domain of CD44 CD43 and ICAM-2. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:885–95. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9472040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brown TJ, Shuford WW, Wang W-C, Nadler SG, Baily TS, Marquardt H, Mittler RS. Characterization of a CD43/leukosialin-mediated pathway for inducing apoptosis in human T-lymphoblastoid cells. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:27686–27695. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8910360. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 10.He YW, Bevan MJ. High level expression of CD43 inhibits T cell receptor/CD3-mediated apoptosis. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1903–1908. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10601365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Todeschini AR, Nunes MP, Pires RS, Lopes MF, Previato JO, Mendonça-Previato L, DosReis GA. Costimulation of host T lymphocytes by a trypanosomal trans-sialidase: Involvement of CD43 signaling. J Immunol. 2002;168:5192–5198. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11994475. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12.Kim HJ, Park HJ, Park WS, Bae Y. CD43 cross-linking increases the Fas-induced apoptosis through induction of Fas aggregation in Jurkat T-cells. Exp Mol Med. 2006;38:357–63. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16953114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hernandez JD, Nguyen JT, He J, Wang W, Ardman B, Green JM, Fukuda M, Baum LG. Galectin-1 binds different CD43 glycoforms to cluster CD43 and regulate T cell death. J Immunol. 2006;177:5328–5336. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17015718. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 14.Brown WRA, Barclay AN, Sunderland CA, Williams AF. Identification of a glycoprotein-like molecule at the cell surface of rat thymocytes. Nature. 1981;289:456–460. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6970337. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Ardman B, Sikorski MA, Staunton DE. CD43 interferes with T-lymphocyte adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5001–5005. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1594606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Soler M, Merant C, Servant C, Fraterno M, Allasia C, Lissitzky JC, Bongrand P, Foa C. Leukosialin (CD43) behavior during adhesion of human monocytic THP-1 cells to red blood cells. J Leukoc Biol. 1997;61:609–618. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9129210. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17.Fukuoka M, Fukudome K, Yamashita Y, Tokushima M, Miyake K and Kimoto M. Antiadhesive function of 130-kd glycoform of CD43 expressed in CD4 T-lymphocyte clones and transfectant cell lines. Blood. 2000,96:4267–4275. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11110701. [PubMed]
- 18.Rosenstein Y, Park JK, Hahn WC, Rosen FS, Bierer BE, Burakoff SJ. CD43, a molecule defective in Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, binds ICAM-1. Nature. 1991;354:233–235. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1683685. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 19.Stöckl J, Majdic O, Kohl P, Pickl WF, Menzel JE, Knapp W. Leukosialin (CD43)-major histocompatibility class I molecule interactions involved in spontaneous T cell conjugate formation. J Exp Med. 1996;184:1769–1779. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8920865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.van den Berg TK, Nath D, Ziltener HJ, Vestweber D, Fukuda M, van Die I, Crocker PR. Cutting edge: CD43 functions as a T cell counterreceptor for the macrophage adhesion receptor sialoadhesin (Siglec-1). J Immunol. 2001;166:3637–3640. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11238599. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Matsumoto M, Atarashi K, Umemoto E, Furukawa Y, Shigeta A, Miyasaka M, Hirata T. CD43 functions as a ligand for E-selectin on activated T cells. J Immunol. 2005;175:8042–8050. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16339541. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 22.Seo W and Ziltener HJ. CD43 processing and nuclear translocation of CD43 cytoplasmic tail are required for cell homeostasis. Blood. 2009;114:3567–3577. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19696198. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 23.Remold-O’Donnell E and Rosen FS. Proteolytic fragmentation of sialophorin (CD43). Localization of the activation-inducing site and examination of the role of sialic acid. J. Immunol. 1990,145:3372–3378. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2230123. [PubMed]
- 24.Campanero MR, Pulido R, Alonso JL, Pivel JP, Pimentel-Muinos FX, Fresno M and Sanchez-Madrid F. Down-regulation by tumor necrosis factor-α of neutrophil cell surface expression of the sialophorin CD43 and the hyaluronate receptor CD44 through a proteolytic mechanism. Eur. J. Immunol. 1991, 21: 3045–3048. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1721026. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 25.Bazil V and Strominger JL. CD43, the major sialoglycoprotein of human leukocytes, is proteolytically cleaved from the surface of stimulated lymphocytes and granulocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1993,90:3792–3796. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7683406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Mambole A, Baruch D, Nusbaum P, Bigot S, Susuki M, Lesavre P, Fukuda M and Halbwachs-Mecarelli L. The cleavage of neutrophil leukosialin (CD43) by cathepsin G releases its extracellular domain and triggers its intramembrane proteolysis by presenilin/γ-secretase. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:23627–23635. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18586676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Da Silva N, Bharti A and Shelley CS. HnRNP-K and Purα act together to repress the transcriptional activity of the CD43 gene promoter. Blood. 2002;100:3536–3544. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12411317. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28.Shelley CS, Da Silva N and Teodoridis JM. During U937 monocytic differentiation repression of the CD43 gene promoter is mediated by the single-stranded DNA binding protein Purα. Br. J. Haematol. 2001;115:159–166. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11722429. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Sánchez-Mateos P, Campanero MR, del Pozo MA and Sánchez-Madrid F. Regulatory role of CD43 leukosialin on integrin-mediated T-cell adhesion to endothelial and extracellular matrix ligands and its polar redistribution to a cellular uropod. Blood. 1995;86:2228–2239. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7545023. [PubMed]
- 30.Sabri S, Soler M, Foa C, Pierres A, Benoliel A and Bongrand P. Glycocalyx modulation is a physiological means of regulating cell adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 2000;113:1589–1600. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10751150. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Seveau S, Keller H, Maxfield FR, Piller F and Halbwachs-Mecarelli L. Neutrophil polarity and locomotion are associated with surface redistribution of leukosialin (CD43), an antiadhesive membrane molecule. Blood. 2000;95:2462–2470. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10753822. [PubMed]
- 32.Piller F, Piller V, Fox RI and Fukuda M. Human T-lymphocyte activation is associated with changes in O-glycan biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:15146–15150. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2971663. [PubMed]
- 33.Jones AT, Federsppiel B, Ellies LG, Williams M J, Burgener R, Duronio V, Smith CA, Takei F and Ziltener H J. Characterization of the activation-associated isoform of CD43 on murine T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 1994;153:3426–3439. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7523493. [PubMed]
- 34.Andersson CX, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Laos S, Sikut R, Sikut, A, Baeckström D and Hansson GC. CD43 has a functional NLS, interacts with β-catenin, and affects gene expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;316:12–17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15003504. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Andersson CX, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Laos S, Baeckström D, Haass C and Hansson GC. Shedding and γ-secretase-mediated intramembrane proteolysis of the mucin-type molecule CD43. Biochem. J. 2005;387:377–384. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15540986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Chatila TA and Geha RS. Phosphorylation of T cell membrane proteins by activators of protein kinase C. J. Immunol. 1988;140:4308–4314. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3259610. [PubMed]
- 37.Silverman LB, Wong RCK, Remold-O’Donnell E, Vercelli D, Sancho J, Terhorst C, Rosen F, Geha R and Chatila T. Mechanism of mononuclear cell activation by anti-CD43 (sialophorin) agonistic antibody. J. Immunol. 1989;142:4194–4200. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2542404. [PubMed]
- 38.Pedraza-Alva G, Mérida LB, Burakoff SJ and Rosenstein Y. CD43-specific activation of T cells induces association of CD43 to Fyn kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:27564–27568. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8910342. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39.Wang W, Link V and Green JM. Identification and cloning of a CD43-associated serine/threonine kinase. Cell. Immunol. 2000;205:34–39. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11078605. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 40.Cruz-Muñoz ME, Salas-Vidal E, Salaiza-Suazo N, Becker I, Pedraza-Alva G and Rosenstein Y. The CD43 coreceptor molecule recruits the z-chain as part of its signaling pathway. J. Immunol. 2003;171:1901–1908. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12902492. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Tada J, Omine M, Suda T and Yamaguchi N. A common signaling pathway via Syk and Lyn tyrosine kinases generated from capping of the sialomucins CD34 and CD43 in immature hematopoietic cells. Blood. 1999;93:3723–3735. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10339479. [PubMed]
- 42.Anzai N, Gotoh A, Shibayama H and Broxmeyer HE. Modulation of integrin function in hematopoietic progenitor cells by CD43 engagement: possible involvement of protein tyrosine kinase and phospholipase C-g. Blood. 1999;93:3317–3326. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10233884. [PubMed]
- 43.Bravo-Adame ME, Vera-Estrella R, Barkla BJ, Martínez-Campos C, Flores-Alcantar A, Ocelotl-Oviedo JP, Pedraza-Alva G and Rosenstein Y. An alternative mode of CD43 signal transduction activates pro-survival pathways of T lymphocytes. Immunology. 2017;150:87–99. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27606486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Pedraza-Alva G, Mérida LB, Burakoff SJ and Rosenstein Y. T cell activation through the CD43 molecule leads to Vav tyrosine phosphorylation and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:14218–14224. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9603925. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 45.Layseca-Espinosa E, Pedraza-Alva G, Montiel JL, del Río R, Fierro NA, González-Amaro R and Rosenstein Y. T cell aggregation induced through CD43: intracellular signals and inhibition by the immunomodulatory drug leflunomide. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2003;74:1083–1093. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12972508. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 46.Pedraza-Alva G, Sawasdikosol S, Liu YC, Mérida LB, Cruz-Muñoz ME, Oceguera-Yañez F, Burakoff SJ and Rosenstein Y. Regulation of Cbl molecular interactions by the co-receptor molecule CD43 in human T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:729–737. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11024037. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 47.Pedraza-Alva G, Mérida LB, del Rio R, Fierro NA, Cruz-Muñoz ME, Olivares N, Melchy E, Igras V, Holländer GA, Burakoff SJ and Rosenstein Y. CD43 regulates the threshold for T cell activation by targeting Cbl functions. IUBMB Life. 2011;63:940–948. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21905200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.del Rio R, Rincón M, Layseca-Espinosa E, Fierro NA, Rosenstein Y and Pedraza-Alva G. PKC θ is required for the activation of human T lymphocytes induced by CD43 engagement. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;325:133–143. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15522211. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 49.Santana MA, Pedraza-Alva G, Olivares-Zavaleta N, Madrid-Marina V, Horejsi V, Burakoff SJ and Rosenstein Y. CD43-mediated signals induce DNA binding activity of AP-1, NF-AT, and NFĸB transcription factors in human lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:31460–31468. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10908570. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 50.Galindo-Albarrán AO, Ramírez-Pliego O, Labastida-Conde RG, Melchy-Pérez EI, Liquitaya-Montiel A, Esquivel-Guadarrama FR, Rosas-Salgado G, Rosenstein Y and Santana MA. CD43 signals prepare human T cells to receive cytokine differentiation signals. J. Cell. Physiol. 2014;229:172–180. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24328034. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 51.Sikut R, Nilsson O, Baeckström D and Hansson GC. Colon adenoma and cancer cells aberrantly express the leukocyte-associated sialoglycoprotein CD43. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 1997;238:612–616. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9299561. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 52.Sikut R, Andersson CX, Sikut A, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Karlsson NG and Hansson GC. Detection of CD43 (leukosialin) in colon adenoma and adenocarcinoma by novel monoclonal antibodies against its intracellular domain. Int. J. Cancer. 1999;82:52–58. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10360820. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 53.Woo VL, Bhuiya T and Kelsch R. Assessment of CD43 expression in adenoid cystic carcinomas, polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinomas, and monomorphic adenomas. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2006;102:495–500. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16997117. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 54.Seethala RR, Pasha TL, Raghunath PN, LiVolsi VA and Zhang PJ. The selective expression of CD43 in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2008;16:165–172. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18227725. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 55.Pimenidou A, Madden LA, Topping KP, Smith KA, Monson JRT and Greenman J. Novel CD43 specific phage antibodies react with early stage colorectal tumours. Oncol. Rep. 2004;11:327–331. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14719063. [PubMed]
- 56.de Laurentiis A, Gaspari M, Palmieri C, Falcone C, Iaccino E, Fiume G, Massa O, Masullo M, Tuccillo FM, Roveda L, Prati U, Fierro O, Cozzolino I, Troncone G, Tassone P, Scala G and Quinto I. Mass spectrometry-based identification of the tumor antigen UN1 as the transmembrane CD43 sialoglycoprotein. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2011;10:M111.007898. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21372249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Tuccillo FM, de Laurentiis A, Palmieri C, Fiume G, Bonelli P, Borrelli A, Tassone P, Scala I, Buonaguro FM, Quinto I and Scala G. Aberrant glycosylation as biomarker for cancer: focus on CD43. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;2014:742831. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24689054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 58.Santamaría M, López-Beltrán A, Toro M, Peña J and Molina IJ. Specific monoclonal antibodies against leukocyte-restricted cell surface molecule CD43 react with nonhematopoietic tumor cells. Cancer Res. 1996;56:3526–3529. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8758921. [PubMed]
- 59.Camacho-Concha N, Olivos-Ortiz A, Nuñez-Rivera A, Pedroza-Saavedra A, Gutierrez-Xicotencatl L, Rosenstein Y and Pedraza-Alva G. CD43 promotes cells transformation by preventing merlin-mediated contact inhibition of growth. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80806. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24260485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 60.Fu Q, Cash SE, Andersen JJ, Kennedy CR, Oldenburg DG, Zander VB, Foley GR and Shelley CS. CD43 in the nucleus and cytoplasm of lung cancer is a potential therapeutic target. Int. J. Cancer. 2013;132:1761–1770. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015282. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 61.Fu Q, Cash SE, Andersen JJ, Kennedy CR, Madadi AR, Raghavendra M, Dietrich LL, Agger WA and Shelley CS. Intracellular patterns of sialophorin expression define a new molecular classification of breast cancer and represent new targets for therapy. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;110:146–155. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24281005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 62.Whiteside TL. Tumor-derived exosomes and their role in cancer progression. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2016;74:103–141. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27117662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 63.Kalluri R. The biology and function of exosomes in cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:1208–1215. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27035812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 64.Melo SA, Sugimoto H, O'Connell JT, Kato N, Villanueva A, Vidal A, Qiu L, Vitkin E, Perelman LT, Melo CA, Lucci A, Ivan C, Calin GA and Kalluri R. Cancer exosomes perform cell-independent microRNA biogenesis and promote tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:707–721. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25446899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 65.Remold-O’Donnell E, Kenney DM, Parkman R, Cairns L, Savage B and Rosen FS. Characterization of a human lymphocyte surface sialoglycoprotein that is defective in Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. J. Exp. Med. 1984;159:1705–1723. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6547160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 66.Mizuno Y, Gotoh A, Kamidono S and Kitazawa S. Establishment and characterization of a new human testicular germ cell tumor cell line (TCam-2). Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1993;84:1211–1218. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8394948. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 67.de Jong J, Stoop H, Gillis AJ, Hersmus R, van Gurp RJ, van de Geijn GJ, van Drunen E, Beverloo HB, Schneider DT, Sherlock JK, Baeten J, Kitazawa S, van Zoelen EJ, van Roozendaal K, Oosterhuis JW and Looijenga LH. Further characterization of the first seminoma cell line TCam-2. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008;47:185–196. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18050305. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 68.Mather JP. Establishment and characterization of two distinct mouse testicular epithelial cell lines. Biol. Reprod. 1980;23:243–252. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6774781. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 69.Rebois RV. Establishment of gonadotropin-responsive murine leydig tumor cell line. J. Cell Biol. 1982;94:70–76. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6288740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 70.Gupta N, Madapura MP, Bhat UA and Rao MR. Mapping of post-translational modifications of transition proteins, TP1 and TP2, and identification of protein arginine methyltransferase 4 and lysine methyltransferase 7 as methyltransferase for TP2. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:12101–12122. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25818198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 71.Rathke C, Baarends WM, Awe S and Renkawitz-Pohl R. Chromatin dynamics during spermiogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1839:155–168. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24091090. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 72.Meistrich ML, Mohapatra B, Shirley CR and Zhao M. Roles of transition nuclear proteins in spermiogenesis. Chromosoma. 2003;111:483–488. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12743712. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 73.Pradeepa MM and Rao MRS. Chromatin remodeling during mammalian spermatogenesis: role of testis specific histone variants and transition proteins. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 2007;63:1–10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17566256. [PubMed]
- 74.Sassone-Corsi P. Unique chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation in spermatogenesis. Science. 2002;296:2176–2178. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12077401. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 75.Berruti G and Paiardi C. Acrosome biogenesis: Revisiting old questions to yield new insights. Spermatogenesis. 2011;1:95–98. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22319656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 76.Baba T, Watanabe K, Kashiwabara S and Arai Y. Primary structure of human proacrosin deduced from its cDNA sequence. FEBS Lett. 1989;244:296–300. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2493394. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 77.Adham IM, Klemm U, Maier WM and Engel W. Molecular cloning of human preproacrosin cDNA. Hum. Genet. 1990;84:125–128. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2298447. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 78.Stross WP, Warnke RA, Flavell DJ, Flavell SU, Simmons D, Gatter KC and Mason DY. Molecule detected in formalin fixed tissue by antibodies MT1, DF-T1, and L60 (Leu-22) corresponds to CD43 antigen. J. Clin. Pathol. 1989;42:953–961. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2794085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 79.Weber S, Ruh B, Dippel E and Czarnetzki BM. Monoclonal antibodies to leucosialin (CD43) induce homotypic aggregation of the human mast cell line HMC-1: characterization of leucosialin on HMC-1 cells. Immunology. 1994;82:638–644. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7835929. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 80.Delestré L, Berthon C, Quesnel B, Figeac M, Kerckaert JP, Galiègue-Zouitina S and Shelley CS. Repression of the RHOH gene by JunD. Biochem. J. 2011;437:75–88. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21473742. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 81.Grech G, Pollacco J, Portelli M, Sacco K, Baldacchino S, Grixti J and Saliba C. Expression of different functional isoforms in haematopoiesis. Int. J. Hematol. 2014;99:4–11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24293279. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 82.Lahousse S, Smorowski AL, Denis C, Lantoine D, Kerckaert JP and Galiègue-Zouitina S. Structural features of hematopoiesis-specific RhoH/ARHH gene: high diversity of 5'-UTR in different hematopoietic lineages suggests a complex post-transcriptional regulation. Gene. 2004;343:55–68. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15563831. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 83.Bahn JH, Lee JH, Li G, Greer C, Peng G and Xiao X. Accurate identification of A-to-I RNA editing in human by transcriptome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012;22:142–150. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21960545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 84.Gott JM and Emeson RB. Functions and mechanisms of RNA editing. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2000;34:499–531. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11092837. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 85.Bass BL. RNA editing by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2002;71:817–846. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12045112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 86.Maydanovych O and Beal PA. Breaking the central dogma by RNA editing. Chem. Rev. 2006;106:3397–3411. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16895334. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 87.Farajollahi S and Maas S. Molecular diversity through RNA editing: a balancing act. Trends Genet. 2010;26:221–230. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20395010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 88.Nishikura K. Functions and regulation of RNA editing by ADAR deaminases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010;79:321–349. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20192758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 89.Nutt SL, Hoo KH, Rampersad V, Deverill RM, Elliott CE, Fletcher EJ, Adams SL, Korczak B, Foldes RL and Kamboj RK. Molecular characterization of the human EAA5 (GluR7) receptor: a high-affinity kainate receptor with novel potential RNA editing sites. Receptors Channels. 1994;2:315–326. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7719709. [PubMed]
- 90.Sharma PM, Bowman M, Madden SL, Rauscher FJ 3rd and Sukumar S. RNA editing in the Wilms' tumor susceptibility gene, WT1. Genes Dev. 1994;8:720–731. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7926762. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 91.Villegas J, Muller I, Arredondo J, Pinto R and Burzio LO. A putative RNA editing from U to C in a mouse mitochondrial transcript. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1895–1901. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11972325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 92.Klimek-Tomczak K, Mikula M, Dzwonek A, Paziewska A, Karczmarski J, Hennig E, Bujnicki JM, Bragoszewski P, Denisenko O, Bomsztyk K and Ostrowski J . Editing of hnRNP K protein mRNA in colorectal adenocarcinoma and surrounding mucosa. Br. J. Cancer. 2006;94:586–592. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16404425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 93.Reese MG, Eeckman FH, Kulp D and Haussler D. Improved splice site detection in Genie. J. Comput. Biol. 1997;4:311–323. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9278062. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 94.Sibley CR, Blazquez L and Ule J. Lessons from non-canonical splicing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016;17:407–421. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27240813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 95.Wang J, Ye Z, Huang TH, Shi H and Jin V. A survey of computational methods in transcriptome-wide alternative splicing analysis. Biomol. Concepts. 2015;6:59–66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25719337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 96.Villate O, Rastrojo A, López-Díez R, Hernández-Torres F and Aguado B. Differential splicing, disease and drug targets. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets. 2008;8:241–251. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19075799. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 97.Hiller M and Platzer M. Widespread and subtle: alternative splicing at short-distance tandem sites. Trends Genet. 2008;24:246–255. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18394746. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 98.House AE and Lynch KW. Regulation of alternative splicing: more than just the ABCs. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:1217–1221. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18024429. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 99.Hui J and Bindereif A. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing in the human system: unexpected role of repetitive sequences as regulatory elements. Biol. Chem. 2005;386:1265–1271. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16336120. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 100.Proudfoot NJ. Ending the message: poly(A) signals then and now. Genes Dev. 2011;25:1770–1782. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21896654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 101.Zhao J, Hyman L and Moore C. Formation of mRNA 3’ ends in eukaryotes: mechanism, regulation, and interrelationships with other steps in mRNA synthesis, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999;63:405–445. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10357856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 102.Colgan DF and Manley JL. Mechanism and regulation of mRNA polyadenylation, Genes Dev. 1997;11:2755–2766. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9353246. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 103.Kozak M. Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell. 1986;44:283–292. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3943125. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 104.Kozak M. An analysis of 5'-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:8125–8148. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3313277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 105.Diaz de Arce AJ, Noderer WL and Wang CL. Complete motif analysis of sequence requirements for translation initiation at non-AUG start codons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:985–994. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29228265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 106.Brown CM, Stockwell PA, Trotman CN and Tate WP. Sequence analysis suggests that tetra-nucleotides signal the termination of protein synthesis in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:6339–6345. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2123028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 107.Schmid K, Hediger MA, Brossmer R, Collins JH, Haupt H, Marti T, Offner GD, Schaller J, Takagaki K, Walsh MT, Schwick HG, Rosen FS and Remold-O’Donnell E. Amino acid sequence of human plasma galactoglycoprotein: identity with the extracellular region of CD43 (sialophorin). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:663–667. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1731338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 108.Remold-O'Donnell E, Van Brocklyn J and Kenney DM. Effect of platelet calpain on normal T-lymphocyte CD43: hypothesis of events in the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Blood. 1992;79:1754–1762. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1558970. [PubMed]
- 109.Remold-O'Donnell E and Parent D. Two proteolytic pathways for down-regulation of the barrier molecule CD43 of human neutrophils. J. Immunol. 1994;152:3595–3605. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7511653. [PubMed]
- 110.Remold-O'Donnell E and Parent D. Specific sensitivity of CD43 to neutrophil elastase. Blood. 1995;86:2395–2402. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7662987. [PubMed]
- 111.Bazil V and Strominger JL. Metalloprotease and serine protease are involved in cleavage of CD43, CD44, and CD16 from stimulated human granulocytes. Induction of cleavage of L-selectin via CD16. J. Immunol. 1994;152:1314–1322. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7507963. [PubMed]
- 112.Aguado E, Santamaría M, Gallego MD, Peña J and Molina IJ. Functional expression of CD43 on human natural killer cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1999;66:923–929. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10614773. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 113.Carlsson SR and Fukuda M. Isolation and characterization of leukosialin, a major sialoglycoprotein on human leukocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 1986;261:12779–12786. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2943740. [PubMed]
- 114.Carlsson SR, Sasaki H and Fukuda M. Structural variations of O-linked oligosaccharides present in leukosialin isolated from erythroid, myeloid, and T-lymphoid cell lines. J. Biol. Chem. 1986;261:12787–12795. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2943741. [PubMed]
- 115.Fukuda M and Carlsson SR. Leukosialin, a major sialoglycoprotein on human leukocytes as differentiation antigens. Med. Biol. 1986;64:335–343. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2950285. [PubMed]
- 116.Fukuda M. Leukosialin, a major O-glycan-containing sialoglycoprotein defining leukocyte differentiation and malignancy. Glycobiology. 1991;1:347–356. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1840294. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 117.Fukuda M and Tsuboi S. Mucin-type O-glycans and leukosialin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999;1455:205–217. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10571013. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 118.Fukuda M. Leukosialin , a major sialoglycoprotein defining leucocyte differentiation. Ciba Found. Symp. 1989;145:257–268. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2529107. [PubMed]
- 119.Howell DN, Ahuja V, Jones L, Blow O and Sanfilippo FP. Differential expression of CD43 (leukosialin, sialophorin) by mononuclear phagocyte populations. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1994;55:536–544. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8145025. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 120.Clark MC and Baum LG. T cells modulate glycans on CD43 and CD45 during development and activation, signal regulation, and survival. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2012;1253:58–67. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22288421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 121.Hay RT. SUMO : a history of modification. Mol. Cell. 2005;18:1–12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15808504. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 122.Rodriguez MS, Dargemont C and Hay RT. SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:12654–12659. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11124955. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 123.Shen B, Wu N, Yang JM and Gould SJ. Protein targeting to exosomes/microvesicles by plasma membrane anchors. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:14383–14395. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21300796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 124.Fanales-Belasio E, Zambruno G, Cavani A and Girolomoni G. Antibodies against sialophorin (CD43) enhance the capacity of dendritic cells to cluster and activate T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 1997;159:2203–2211. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9278308. [PubMed]
- 125.Amano J, Morimoto C and Irimura T. Intestinal epithelial cells express and secrete the CD43 glycoform that contains core 2 O-glycans. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:723–728. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11489420. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 126.Dufau ML, Winters CA, Hattori M, Aquilano D, Barañao JL, Nozu K, Baukal A and Catt KJ. Hormonal regulation of androgen production by the Leydig cell. J. Steroid Biochem. 1984;20:161–173. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6323862. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 127.Dufau ML, Khanum A, Winters CA and Tsai-Morris CH. Multistep regulation of Leydig cell function. J. Steroid Biochem. 1987;27:343–350. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2826891. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 128.Cooke BA, Choi MC, Dirami G, Lopez-Ruiz MP and West AP. Control of steroidogenesis in Leydig cells. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1992;43:445–449. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1390294. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 129.Guo Y, Shen O, Han J, Duan H, Yang S, Zhu Z, Tong J and Zhang J. Circadian rhythm genes mediate fenvalerate-induced inhibition of testosterone synthesis in mouse Leydig cells. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 2017;80:1314–1320. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040059. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 130.Chen H, Gao L, Xiong Y, Yang D, Li C, Wang A and Jin Y. Circadian clock and steroidogenic-related gene expression profiles in mouse Leydig cells following dexamethasone stimulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017;483:294–300. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28025148. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 131.Baburski AZ, Sokanovic SJ, Bjelic MM, Radovic SM, Andric SA and Kostic TS. Circadian rhythm of the Leydig cells endocrine function is attenuated during aging. Exp. Gerontol. 2016;73:5–13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26547053. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 132.Baburski AZ, Sokanovic SJ, Andric SA and Kostic TS. Aging has the opposite effect on cAMP and cGMP circadian variations in rat Leydig cells. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 2017;187:613–623. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27915366. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 133.Alvarez JD, Hansen A, Ord T, Bebas P, Chappell PE, Giebultowicz JM, Williams C, Moss S and Sehgal A. The circadian clock protein BMAL1 is necessary for fertility and proper testosterone production in mice. J. Biol. Rhythms. 2008;23:26–36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18258755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 134.Benahmed M, Tabone E, Grenot C, Sanchez P, Chauvin MA and Morera AM. Paracrine control of Leydig cell activity by FSH dependent proteins from Sertoli cells: an in vitro study. J. Steroid Biochem. 1986;24:311–315. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3084873. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 135.Lejeune H, Sanchez P and Saez JM. Enhancement of long-term testosterone secretion and steroidogenic enzyme expression in human Leydig cells by co-culture with human Sertoli cell-enriched preparations. Int. J. Androl. 1998;21:129–140. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9669197. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 136.Zwain IH, Morris PL and Cheng CY. Identification of an inhibitory factor from a Sertoli clonal cell line (TM4) that modulates adult rat Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1991;80:115–126. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1955071. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 137.van Haren L, Flinterman JF and Rommerts FF. Inhibition of the luteinizing hormone-dependent induction of cholesterol side chain cleavage enzyme in immature rat Leydig cells by Sertoli cell products. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 1995;132:627–634. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7749507. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 138.Wu N and Murono EP. A Sertoli cell-secreted paracrine factor(s) stimulates proliferation and inhibits steroidogenesis of rat Leydig cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1994;106:99–109. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7895920. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 139.Verhoeven G and Cailleau J. Influence of coculture with Sertoli cells on steroidogenesis in immature rat Leydig cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1990;71:239–251. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2120092. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 140.Perrard-Sapori MH, Chatelain PC, Rogemond N and Saez JM. Modulation of Leydig cell functions by culture with Sertoli cells or with Sertoli cell-conditioned medium: effect of insulin, somatomedin-C and FSH. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1987;50:193–201. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3032709. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 141.Herrera J, Garcia-Castro JR, Rodriguez-Maldonado E, Mendieta E and Bermúdez JA. Sertoli cell conditioned media modulate the androgen biosynthetic pathways in rat Leydig cell primary cultures. Arch. Androl. 1996;37:127–133. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8886262. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 142.Naville D, Chatelain PG, Avallet O and Saez JM. Control of production of insulin-like growth factor I by pig Leydig and Sertoli cells cultured alone or together. Cell-cell interactions. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1990;70:217–224. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2113875. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 143.Carreau S. Paracrine control of human Leydig cell and Sertoli cell functions. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 1996;34:111–119. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8967955. [PubMed]
- 144.Onoda M, Djakiew D and Papadopoulos V. Pachytene spermatocytes regulate the secretion of Sertoli cell protein(s) which stimulate Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1991;77:207–216. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1816003. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 145.Boujrad N, Guillaumin JM, Bardos P, Hochereau de Reviers MT, Drosdowsky MA and Carreau S. Germ cell-Sertoli cell interactions and production of testosterone by purified Leydig cells from mature rat. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1992;41:677–681. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1348625. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 146.Fujisawa M, Tatsumi N, Fujioka H, Kanzaki M, Okuda Y, Arakawa S and Kamidono S. Nitric oxide production of rat Leydig and Sertoli cells is stimulated by round spermatid factor(s). Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2000;160:99–105. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10715543. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 147.Walker WH and Cheng J. FSH and testosterone signaling in Sertoli cells. Reproduction. 2005;130:15–28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15985628. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 148.Loss ES, Jacobus AP and Wassermann GF. Diverse FSH and testosterone signaling pathways in the Sertoli cell. Horm. Metab. Res. 2007;39:806–812. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17992635. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 149.Loss ES, Jacobus AP and Wassermann GF. Rapid signaling responses in Sertoli cell membranes induced by follicle stimulating hormone and testosterone: calcium inflow and electrophysiological changes. Life Sci. 2011;89:577–583. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21703282. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 150.Chalmel F, Com E, Lavigne R, Hernio N, Teixeira-Gomes AP, Dacheux JL and Pineau C. An integrative omics strategy to assess the germ cell secretome and to decipher sertoli-germ cell crosstalk in the Mammalian testis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e104418. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25111155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 151.Mather JP, Gunsalus GL, Musto NA, Cheng CY, Parvinen M, Wright W, Pérez-Infante V, Margioris A, Liotta A, Becker R, Krieger DT and Bardin CW. The hormonal and cellular control of Sertoli cell secretion. J. Steroid Biochem. 1983;19:41–51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6411985. [PubMed]
- 152.Castellon E, Janecki A and Steinberger A. Influence of germ cells on Sertoli cell secretory activity in direct and indirect co-culture with Sertoli cells from rats of different ages. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1989;64:169–178. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2792561. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 153.Onoda M and Djakiew D. Modulation of Sertoli cell secretory function by rat round spermatid protein(s). Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1990;73:35–44. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2127259. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 154.Pineau C, Syed V, Bardin CW, Jégou B and Cheng CY. Germ cell-conditioned medium contains multiple factors that modulate the secretion of testins, clusterin, and transferrin by Sertoli cells. J. Androl. 1993;14:87–98. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8514623. [PubMed]
- 155.Gérard N and Jégou B. In-vitro influence of germ cells on Sertoli cell-secreted proteins: a two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis. Int. J. Androl. 1993;16:285–291. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8262662. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 156.Onoda M and Djakiew D. Pachytene spermatocyte protein(s) stimulate Sertoli cells grown in bicameral chambers: dose-dependent secretion of ceruloplasmin, sulfated glycoprotein-1, sulfated glycoprotein-2, and transferrin. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 1991;27A:215–222. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1903382. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 157.Djakiew D and Dym M. Pachytene spermatocyte proteins influence Sertoli cell function. Biol. Reprod. 1988;39:1193–1205. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3219390. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 158.Clifton RJ, O'Donnell L and Robertson DM. Pachytene spermatocytes in co-culture inhibit rat Sertoli cell synthesis of inhibin beta B-subunit and inhibin B but not the inhibin alpha-subunit. J. Endocrinol. 2002;172:565–574. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11874705. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 159.Ireland ME and Welsh MJ. Germ cell stimulation of Sertoli cell protein phosphorylation. Endocrinology. 1987;120:1317–1326. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3104010. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 160.Chung SS, Zhu LJ, Mo MY, Silvestrini B, Lee WM and Cheng CY. Evidence for cross- talk between Sertoli and germ cells using selected cathepsins as markers. J. Androl. 1998;19:686–703. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9876020. [PubMed]
- 161.Griswold MD. 50 years of Spermatogenesis: Sertoli cells and their Interactions with germ cells. Biol. Reprod. 2018;99:87–100. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29462262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 162.Mruk DD and Cheng CY. Sertoli-Sertoli and Sertoli-germ cell interactions and their significance in germ cell movement in the seminiferous epithelium during spermatogenesis. Endocr. Rev. 2004;25:747–806. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15466940. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 163.Hermo L, Pelletier RM, Cyr DG and Smith CE. Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 5: intercellular junctions and contacts between germs cells and Sertoli cells and their regulatory interactions, testicular cholesterol, and genes/proteins associated with more than one germ cell generation. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2010;73:409–494. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19941291. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 164.Hofmann MC, Narisawa S, Hess RA and Millán JL. Immortalization of germ cells and somatic testicular cells using the SV40 large T antigen. Exp. Cell Res. 1992;201:417–435. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1322317. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 165.Meinhardt A, Renneberg H, Dersch A, Wennemuth G, Millán JL, Aumüller G and Seitz J. The immortalized mouse germ cell lines GC-1spg and GC-2spd as a model for mitochondrial differentiation during meiosis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1997;424:61–63. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9361764. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 166.Nettersheim D, Gillis AJ, Looijenga LH and Schorle H. TGF-β1, EGF and FGF4 synergistically induce differentiation of the seminoma cell line TCam-2 into a cell type resembling mixed non-seminoma. Int. J. Androl. 2011;34:e189-e203. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21649665. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 167.Carlomagno G, van Bragt MP, Korver CM, Repping S, de Rooij DG and van Pelt AM. BMP4-induced differentiation of a rat spermatogonial stem cell line causes changes in its cell adhesion properties. Biol. Reprod. 2010;83:742–749. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20650884. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 168.Young JC, Jaiprakash A, Mithraprabhu S, Itman C, Kitazawa R, Looijenga LH and Loveland KL. TCam-2 seminoma cell line exhibits characteristic foetal germ cell responses to TGF-beta ligands and retinoic acid. Int. J. Androl. 2011;34:e204-e217. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21668453. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 169.Nagano M, Ryu BY, Brinster CJ, Avarbock MR and Brinster RL. Maintenance of mouse male germ line stem cells in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 2003;68:2207–2214. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12606373. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 170.Godet M, Sabido O, Gilleron J and Durand P. Meiotic progression of rat spermatocytes requires mitogen-activated protein kinases of Sertoli cells and close contacts between the germ cells and the Sertoli cells. Dev. Biol. 2008;315:173–188. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18234180. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 171.O'Brien DA, Gabel CA and Eddy EM. Mouse Sertoli cells secrete mannose 6-phosphate containing glycoproteins that are endocytosed by spermatogenic cells. Biol. Reprod. 1993;49:1055–1065. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8286571. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 172.Tsuruta JK and O'Brien DA. Sertoli cell-spermatogenic cell interaction: the insulin-like growth factor-II/cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor mediates changes in spermatogenic cell gene expression in mice. Biol. Reprod. 1995;53:1454–1464. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8562703. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 173.Nakahata Y, Yoshida M, Takano A, Soma H, Yamamoto T, Yasuda A, Nakatsu T and Takumi T. A direct repeat of E-box-like elements is required for cell-autonomous circadian rhythm of clock genes. BMC Mol. Biol. 2008;9:1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18177499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 174.Gustafson CL and Partch CL. Emerging models for the molecular basis of mammalian circadian timing. Biochemistry. 2015;54:134–149. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25303119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 175.Muñoz E, Brewer M and Baler R. Modulation of BMAL/CLOCK/E-Box complex activity by a CT-rich cis-acting element. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2006;252:74–81. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16650525. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 176.Zhang Y, Fang B, Emmett MJ, Damle M, Sun Z, Feng D, Armour SM, Remsberg JR, Jager J, Soccio RE, Steger DJ and Lazar MA. Discrete functions of nuclear receptor Rev-erbα couple metabolism to the clock. Science. 2015;348:1488–1492. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26044300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 177.Harding HP and Lazar MA. The orphan receptor Rev-ErbAα activates transcription via a novel response element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993;13:3113–3121. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8474464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 178.Retnakaran R, Flock G and Giguère V. Identification of RVR, a novel orphan nuclear receptor that acts as a negative transcriptional regulator. Mol. Endocrinol. 1994;8:1234–1244. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7838156. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 179.Dumas B, Harding HP, Choi HS, Lehmann KA, Chung M, Lazar MA and Moore DD. A new orphan member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily closely related to Rev-Erb. Mol. Endocrinol. 1994;8:996–1005. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7997240. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 180.Giguère V, Tini M, Flock G, Ong E, Evans RM and Otulakowski G. Isoform-specific amino-terminal domains dictate DNA-binding properties of ROR alpha, a novel family of orphan hormone nuclear receptors. Genes Dev. 1994;8:538–553. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7926749. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 181.Medvedev A, Yan ZH, Hirose T, Giguere V and Jetten AM. Cloning of a cDNA encoding the murine orphan receptor RZR/ROR γ and characterization of its response element. Gene. 1996;181:199–206. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8973331. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 182.Preitner N, Damiola F, Lopez-Molina L, Zakany J, Duboule D, Albrecht U and Schibler U. The orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBalpha controls circadian transcription within the positive limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Cell. 2002;110:251–260. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12150932. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 183.Partch CL, Green CB and Takahashi JS. Molecular architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24:90–99 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23916625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 184.Garénaux E, Kanagawa M, Tsuchiyama T, Hori K, Kanazawa T, Goshima A, Chiba M, Yasue H, Ikeda A, Yamaguchi Y, Sato C and Kitajima K. Discovery, primary, and crystal structures and capacitation-related properties of a prostate-derived heparin-binding protein WGA16 from boar sperm. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:5484–5501. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 185.CD43 (SPN): Human genome location. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6693.
- 186.Zymogen granule protein 16 (ZG16): Human genome location. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/653808.
- 187.Epididymis secretory sperm binding protein Li 90n (QPRT): Human genome location. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/23475.
- 188.CD43 (SPN): Mouse genome location. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/20737.
- 189.Zymogen granule protein 16 (ZG16): Mouse genome location. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/69036.
- 190.Epididymis secretory sperm binding protein Li 90n (QPRT): Mouse genome location. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/67375.
- 191.Shelley CS, Remold-O'Donnell E, Rosen FS and Whitehead AS. Structure of the human sialophorin ( CD43) gene. Identification of features atypical of genes encoding integral membrane proteins. Biochem. J. 1990;270:569–576. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2241892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 192.Cyster J, Somoza C, Killeen N and Williams AF. Protein sequence and gene structure for mouse leukosialin (CD43), a T lymphocyte mucin without introns in the coding sequence. Eur. J. Immunol. 1990;20:875–881. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2347365. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 193.Kudo S and Fukuda M. Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation of human leukosialin (CD43) gene is achieved by DNA methylation. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:13298–13302. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7768930. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 194.Kudo S. Methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 represses Sp1-activated transcription of the human leukosialin gene when the promoter is methylated. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998;18:5492–5499. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9710633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 195.Kudo S and Fukuda M. A short, novel promoter sequence confers the expression of human leukosialin, a major sialoglycoprotein on leukocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 1991;266:8483–8489. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1827122. [PubMed]
- 196.Kudo S and Fukuda M. Transcriptional activation of human leukosialin (CD43) gene by Sp1 through binding to a GGGTGG motif. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994;223:319–327. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8055899. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 197.Bracke A, Peeters K, Punjabi U, Hoogewijs D and Dewilde S. A search for molecular mechanisms underlying male idiopathic infertility. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2018;36:327–339. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29336995. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 198.Nistal M, Jimenez F and Paniagua R. Sertoli cell types in the Sertoli-cell-only syndrome: relationships between Sertoli cell morphology and aetiology. Histopathology. 1990;16:173–180. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2182507. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 199.Terada T and Hatakeyama S. Morphological evidence for two types of idiopathic 'Sertoli-cell-only' syndrome. Int. J. Androl. 1991;14:117–126. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1907948. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 200.Anniballo R, Ubaldi F, Cobellis L, Sorrentino M, Rienzi L, Greco E and Tesarik J. Criteria predicting the absence of spermatozoa in the Sertoli cell-only syndrome can be used to improve success rates of sperm retrieval. Hum. Reprod. 2000;15:2269–2277. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11056118. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 201.Weller O, Yogev L, Yavetz H, Paz G, Kleiman S and Hauser R. Differentiating between primary and secondary Sertoli-cell-only syndrome by histologic and hormonal parameters. Fertil. Steril. 2005;83:1856–1858. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15950666. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 202.World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research. World Health Organization laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, fifth edition, Geneva, Switzerland. 2010. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/infertility/9789241547789/en/.
- 203.Samanta L, Parida R, Dias TR and Agarwal A. The enigmatic seminal plasma: a proteomics insight from ejaculation to fertilization. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2018;16:41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29704899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 204.Davalieva K, Kiprijanovska S, Noveski P, Plaseski T, Kocevska B, Broussard C and Plaseska-Karanfilska D. Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma in men with different spermatogenic impairment. Andrologia. 2012;44:256–264. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22288839. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 205.Milardi D, Grande G, Vincenzoni F, Messana I, Pontecorvi A, De Marinis L, Castagnola M and Marana R. Proteomic approach in the identification of fertility pattern in seminal plasma of fertile men. Fertil. Steril. 2012;97:67–73.e1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22088208. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 206.Drabovich AP, Jarvi K and Diamandis EP. Verification of male infertility biomarkers in seminal plasma by multiplex selected reaction monitoring assay. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2011;10:M110.004127. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21933954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 207.Drabovich AP, Saraon P, Jarvi K and Diamandis EP. Seminal plasma as a diagnostic fluid for male reproductive system disorders. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2014;11:278–288. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24709963. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 208.Bieniek JM, Drabovich AP and Lo KC. Seminal biomarkers for the evaluation of male infertility. Asian J. Androl. 2016;18:426–433. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26975492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 209.Bonnici J, Fenech A, Muscat C and Calleja-Agius J. The role of seminal fluid in infertility. Minerva Ginecol. 2017;69:390–401. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28398021. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 210.Rolland AD, Lavigne R, Dauly C, Calvel P, Kervarrec C, Freour T, Evrard B, Rioux-Leclercq N, Auger J and Pineau C. Identification of genital tract markers in the human seminal plasma using an integrative genomics approach. Hum. Reprod. 2013;28:199–209. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23024119. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 211.Agarwal A, Ayaz A, Samanta L, Sharma R, Assidi M, Abuzenadah AM and Sabanegh E. Comparative proteomic network signatures in seminal plasma of infertile men as a function of reactive oxygen species. Clin. Proteomics. 2015;12:23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 212.Wang J, Wang J, Zhang HR, Shi HJ, Ma D, Zhao HX, Lin B and Li RS. Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma from asthenozoospermia patients reveals proteins that affect oxidative stress responses and semen quality. Asian J. Androl. 2009;11:484–491. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19448646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 213.Sharma R, Agarwal A, Mohanty G, Du Plessis SS, Gopalan B, Willard B, Yadav SP and Sabanegh E. Proteomic analysis of seminal fluid from men exhibiting oxidative stress. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2013;11:85. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24004880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 214.Diamandis EP, Arnett WP, Foussias G, Pappas H, Ghandi S, Melegos DN, Mullen B, Yu H, Srigley J and Jarvi K. Seminal plasma biochemical markers and their association with semen analysis findings. Urology. 1999;53:596–603. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10096390. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 215.Heshmat SM, Mullen JB, Jarvi KA, Soosaipillai A, Diamandis EP, Hamilton RJ and Lo KC. Seminal plasma lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase: a potential new marker for the diagnosis of obstructive azoospermia. J. Urol. 2008;179:1077–1080. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18206953. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 216.Yamakawa K, Yoshida K, Nishikawa H, Kato T and Iwamoto T. Comparative analysis of interindividual variations in the seminal plasma proteome of fertile men with identification of potential markers for azoospermia in infertile patients. J. Androl. 2007;28:858–865. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17554110. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 217.Aalberts M, van Dissel-Emiliani FM, van Adrichem NP, van Wijnen M, Wauben MH, Stout TA and Stoorvogel W. Identification of distinct populations of prostasomes that differentially express prostate stem cell antigen, annexin A1, and GLIPR2 in humans. Biol. Reprod. 2012;86:82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22133690. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 218.Machtinger R, Laurent LC and Baccarelli AA. Extracellular vesicles: roles in gamete maturation, fertilization and embryo implantation. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2016;22:182–193. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26663221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 219.Yang C, Guo WB, Zhang WS, Bian J, Yang JK, Zhou QZ, Chen MK, Peng W, Qi T, Wang CY and Liu CD. Comprehensive proteomics analysis of exosomes derived from human seminal plasma. Andrology. 2017;5:1007–1015. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28914500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 220.Sullivan R. Epididymosomes: a heterogeneous population of microvesicles with multiple functions in sperm maturation and storage. Asian J. Androl. 2015;17:726–729. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26112475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 221.D'Amours O, Frenette G, Bordeleau LJ, Allard N, Leclerc P, Blondin P and Sullivan R. Epididymosomes transfer epididymal sperm binding protein 1 (ELSPBP1) to dead spermatozoa during epididymal trans it in bovine. Biol. Reprod. 2012;87:94. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22875906. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 222.Aalberts M, Stout TA and Stoorvogel W. Prostasomes: extracellular vesicles from the prostate. Reproduction. 2013;147:R1-R14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24149515. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 223.Poliakov A, Spilman M, Dokland T, Amling CL and Mobley JA. Structural heterogeneity and protein composition of exosome-like vesicles (prostasomes) in human semen. Prostate. 2009;69:159–167. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18819103. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 224.Utleg AG, Yi EC, Xie T, Shannon P, White JT, Goodlett DR, Hood L and Lin B. Proteomic analysis of human prostasomes. Prostate. 2003;56:150–161. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12746840. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 225.Park KH, Kim BJ, Kang J, Nam TS, Lim JM, Kim HT, Park JK, Kim YG, Chae SW and Kim UH. Ca2+ signaling tools acquired from prostasomes are required for progesterone-induced sperm motility. Sci. Signal. 2011;4:ra31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21586728. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 226.Bailey JL. Factors regulating sperm capacitation. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2010;56:334–348. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20849222. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 227.Fraser LR. The "switching on" of mammalian spermatozoa: molecular events involved in promotion and regulation of capacitation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2010;77:197–208. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19908247. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 228.Harrison RA and Miller NG. cAMP-dependent protein kinase control of plasma membrane lipid architecture in boar sperm. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2000;55:220–228. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10618662. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 229.Pons-Rejraji H, Artonne C, Sion B, Brugnon F, Canis M, Janny L and Grizard G. Prostasomes: inhibitors of capacitation and modulators of cellular signalling in human sperm. Int. J. Androl. 2011;34:568–580. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21029115. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 230.Visconti PE, Westbrook VA, Chertihin O, Demarco I, Sleight S and Diekman AB. Novel signaling pathways involved in sperm acquisition of fertilizing capacity. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2002;53:133–150. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11730911. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 231.Aalberts M, Sostaric E, Wubbolts R, Wauben MW, Nolte-'t Hoen EN, Gadella BM, Stout TA and Stoorvogel W. Spermatozoa recruit prostasomes in response to capacitation induction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1834:2326–2335. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22940639. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 232.Manjunath N, Correa M, Ardman M and Ardman B. Negative regulation of T-cell adhesion and activation by CD43. Nature. 1995;377:535–538. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7566153. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 233.Friedler S, Ben-Ami I, Gidoni Y, Strassburger D, Kasterstein E, Maslansky B, Komarovsy D, Bern O, Ron-El R and Raziel A. Effect of seminal plasma application to the vaginal vault in in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment cycles-a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2013;30:907–911. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23812801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 234.Chicea R, Ispasoiu F and Focsa M. Seminal plasma insemination during ovum-pickup - a method to increase pregnancy rate in IVF/ICSI procedure. A pilot randomized trial. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2013;30:569–574. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23400375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.






