Abstract
Purpose
To develop and validate a novel chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI method to map skeletal muscle OXPHOS (Oxidative Phosphorylation CEST or OXCEST).
Theory and Methods
Our proposed OXCEST method acquirses creatine (Cr)-weighted CEST maps by applying RF saturation (B1) at only two frequency offsets: +1.8 ppm (targeting the Cr amine resonance) and −1.8 ppm (to calculate MTRasym at 1.8 ppm). The pre-exercise MTRasym is modeled as a second-order polynomial function of B0 (f(B0)). Next, the post-exercise alteration in MTRasym is hypothesized to be affected by both an exercise-induced increase in Cr and changes in B0 inhomogeneity. By inputting post-exercise B0 values into f, the change in MTRasym due to B0 variation alone was estimated, thus allowing for the quantification of only Cr-related post-exercise MTRasym changes. OXCEST and 31P-MRS were performed in seven subjects across two sessions to compare the OXCEST-derived Cr recovery time constant (TCr) with the ground-truth phosphocreatine recovery time constant (TPCr) derived by 31P-MRS.
Results
Function f reliably described the relationship between pre-exercise MTRasym and B0 (R2 = 0.87 ± 0.07 in the lateral gastrocnemius (LG); R2 = 0.98 ± 0.01 in the medial gastrocnemius (MG); R2 = 0.96 ± 0.03 in the soleus). The mean pre-exercise MTRasym was approximately 6%−7% for all muscle groups. Following exercise, MTRasym increased by 11.4% ± 4.5% in LG and 8% ± 2.4% in MG, and showed mono-exponential recovery (R2 > 0.97). The combined TCr of LG and MG was found to be significantly correlated with TPCr (R2 = 0.83, p = 0.005).
Conclusion
OXCEST enables reliable assessment of post-exercise Cr recovery and demonstrates significant correlation and good agreement with 31P-MRS.
Keywords: CEST, creatine, OXPHOS, phosphocreatine, skeletal muscle
1. Introduction
Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is a central metabolic pathway responsible for generating adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the primary energy currency of the cell. OXPHOS capacity varies significantly across populations: endurance-trained athletes exhibit markedly higher mitochondrial activity than sedentary lean or overweight individuals [1]. Conversely, impaired mitochondrial OXPHOS is a hallmark of numerous pathological conditions, including neuromuscular disorders, primary mitochondrial diseases, and age-related decline [2–5].
Currently, invasive muscle biopsy remains the clinical gold-standard method for assessing OXPHOS capacity [6]. However, biopsies are inherently limited by patient discomfort, inability to capture dynamic metabolic changes, and poor feasibility for repeated longitudinal assessments. 31-Phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) has traditionally been regarded as the MR-based gold standard technique to non-invasively quantify mitochondrial function in skeletal muscle [7–11]. During muscle contraction, phosphocreatine (PCr) is hydrolyzed to regenerate ATP from ADP, and during recovery, it is resynthesized via the creatine kinase (CK) reaction, which stoichiometrically couples PCr and creatine (Cr) [12, 13]. 31P-MRS has been extensively applied to study mitochondrial dysfunction in aging and mitochondrial diseases [8, 14–16]. Nevertheless, its wider application of 31P-MRS is challenged by relatively low intrinsic sensitivity, the requirement for specialized hardware, and lower spatial resolution compared to proton-based MRI techniques.
Over the past decade, imaging the post-exercise recovery kinetics of Cr and PCr has emerged as a 1H-based alternative to 31P-MRS by acquiring a partial or full z-spectrum [17–22]. Currently, magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym), defined as the difference between signals at the positive and negative frequency offsets relative to water, is the most widely used chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) quantification metric. Recently, Phillip Zhe Sun [23] introduced an expedient B0 inhomogeneity correction algorithm for fast pH imaging that requires only two frequency offsets, based on the observation that MTRasym can be modeled as a second-order polynomial function of B0 inhomogeneity. Building on this principle, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a new technique, termed oxidative phosphorylation CEST (OXCEST), which integrates the fast B0-correction method with acquisition at only two offsets: +1.8 and −1.8 ppm. Restricting CEST acquisition to two frequencies enables higher temporal resolution, comparable to that of 31P-MRS. We evaluated the feasibility of OXCEST in healthy subjects by directly comparing outcomes with those obtained from gold-standard 31P-MRS.
2. Theory
2.1. Cr Mapping in Skeletal Muscle
A typical z-spectrum is primarily influenced by the following CEST pools: (i) direct water proton saturation (DS), the largest water signal intensity drop occurring at 0 ppm, (ii) conventional semi-solid magnetization transfer (MT) arising from the “bound” pool of water molecules cross-relaxing with protons in the free water pool, (iii) amide proton transfer (APT) at 3.5 ppm, arising from the exchangeable amide protons in the backbone of mobile proteins and peptides, (iv) exchange-relayed nuclear Overhauser effect (rNOE) at −3.5 ppm, from aliphatic protons of mobile macromolecules, and (v) Cr CEST at 1.8 ppm, from the exchangeable amine protons of Cr.
The MTRasym analysis of the z-spectrum can separate the symmetrical contribution of DS and MT (Equation 1).
| (1) |
At high B1 (˜3 μT), used in this study, the contributions of PCr, APT, and rNOE at ±1.8 ppm are negligible [17, 24–27]. Therefore, without considering B0 inhomogeneity effects, RF irradiation at only two frequency offsets (±1.8 ppm) is sufficient to quantify the pre-exercise CEST contribution of Cr using MTRasym (MTRasymPre). However, as the resonance frequency in MRI is proportional to B0, even a minor magnetic field inhomogeneity (ΔB0) can cause substantial frequency shifts in the z-spectrum [28]. To correct for this B0 inhomogeneity, additional frequency offsets are acquired [18, 20].
Following interventions such as mild plantar flexion exercise, pH in skeletal muscle remains relatively constant at effort below 60% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) during plantar flexion [29], and therefore does not significantly influence the CEST contrast. Consequently, exercise-induced change in Cr level, mediated by CK, is expected to be the primary contributor to the post-exercise MTRasym (MTRasymPost). Additional contribution to MTRasymPost comes from exercise-induced motion, which perturbs B0 [30], and causes post-exercise ΔB0 (ΔB0Post) to differ from the pre-exercise ΔB0 (ΔB0Pre). Given that PCr resynthesis is stoichiometrically coupled with a decrease in free Cr, a higher temporal resolution scan will enable capturing rapid changes in Cr levels. Here, we propose limiting the CEST acquisition to only two offsets (+1.8 and −1.8 ppm), thereby attaining a temporal resolution of 10 s (5 s per offset × 2 offsets).
2.2. Fast B0 Correction in OXCEST
To account for pre- and post-exercise B0 inhomogeneities, we modeled the relationship between MTRasymPre and the corresponding ΔB0Pre across all pixels within a muscle. A second-order polynomial function was fit using least-squares regression to obtain the coefficients c0, c1, c2: [23]
| (2) |
where i = 1, 2, …, N and N is the total number of pixels in a muscle ROI. This fitted function f (c0, c1, c2) therefore characterizes, at a pixel level, how much the MTRasymPre varies with ΔB0Pre in a given muscle. ΔB0Post and ΔB0Pre are measured independently and hence were not assumed to be identical. Next, ΔB0Pre values were replaced with ΔB0Post in f to estimate the B0-related contribution to the post-exercise MTRasym (MTRasymPost):
| (3) |
We hypothesized that the observed MTRasymPost at each pixel reflects two additive effects: (a) a B0-induced shift, MTRasymΔB0, and (b) a physiologic change due to exercise-induced change in Cr concentration, MTRasymΔCr.
Thus, the measured MTRasymPost can be expressed as follows:
| (4) |
By subtracting the estimated B0-induced component, we isolate the Cr-related contribution:
| (5) |
Finally, for each muscle, the net MTRasymΔCr was computed as the mean value across all pixels within the segmented region.
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design
The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to imaging. Seven healthy adults (male: 5, mean age: 34.6 ± 6.1 years) were enrolled. Each participant underwent two MR sessions: one for OXCEST and one for 31P-MRS performed on different days using a 3T whole-body MR scanner (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). During each session, participants performed a mild plantar flexion exercise for 2 min at a constant rate of 45 flexions per minute guided by a metronome, using an MR-compatible ergometer (Trispect, Ergospect GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). The pedal resistance was adjusted to correspond to 30%−40% of each participant’s MVC. The MRI protocols for OXCEST and 31P-MRS are summarized in Figure S1.
3.2. OXCEST MRI
OXCEST data were acquired with a Tx/Rx 1/15-channel 1H knee coil (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). A localizer was first obtained on the right calf to position the imaging slice at the thickest section of the calf muscle. Pre-exercise acquisitions included: (i) one image without selective saturation, (ii) a B1 map using a double angle method (30° and 60°) [31], (iii) a B0 map using standard water-saturation shift-referencing (WASSR) [28], and (iv) four baseline CEST images [22]. Post-exercise acquisitions commenced immediately following the 2-min exercise and consisted of: (i) dynamic CEST imaging (60 sets of positive and negative offset images at 10 s temporal resolution), (ii) B0 map, (iii) B1 map, and (iv) one reference image without selective saturation. OXCEST imaging parameters were set as follows: TR/TE = 4.7/2.3 ms, slice thickness = 10 mm, flip angle = 10°, B1rms = 3 μT, in-plane resolution = 1.25 × 1.25 mm2, matrix size = 128 × 128, field of view = 160 × 160 mm2. OXCEST images were acquired with saturation frequency offsets of ±1.8 ppm relative to the water resonance, achieving a temporal resolution of 10 s (5 s per offset × 2 offsets). Two dummy scans were included to achieve T1 steady state. For four participants, shimming was constrained to a voxel encompassing the three muscles of interest. Although MTRasym was relatively stable around optimal RF power level [32], both pre- and post-exercise OXCEST images were corrected for minor B1 variations using an inverse scaling model, assuming a linear relationship between B1 amplitude and CEST signal intensity [31].
3.3. 31P-MRS
31P-MRS was performed with a 1H/31P dual-tuned flex transmit/receive surface coil of 11 cm diameter (RAPID Biomedical GmbH, Würzburg-Rimpar, Germany) placed over the calf, using an unlocalized free induction decay (FID) sequence: measurements = 96, averages = 2, bandwidth = 5000 Hz, and TR = 5 s. The total data acquisition time was 15 min: 5 min of baseline, 2 min of exercise, and 8 min of post-exercise recovery. The temporal resolution of 31P-MRS was kept at 10 s to match the temporal resolution of OXCEST acquisitions.
3.4. Data Analysis
All images and data/statistical analyses were performed on MATLAB v2023b.
3.4.1. OXCEST
The lateral gastrocnemius (LG), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and soleus (Sol) muscles were manually segmented on the pre-exercise reference image and on each post-exercise CEST image. Because exercise can induce positional shifts and subtle anatomic changes, including transient hypertrophy post-exercise, regions of interest (ROIs) were re-segmented on each post-exercise image until muscle boundaries were stabilized across consecutive time points (typically within 2 min). The tibialis anterior (TA) was also manually segmented as an expected negative control for the plantar-flexion exercise. The B0-corrected MTRasymΔCr signals, reflecting exercise-induced changes in Cr, were computed for each muscle group as described in Section 2.2. The post-exercise Cr recovery time-constant (TCr) was estimated by fitting a mono-exponential decay model:
| (6) |
where a0 is the baseline value and a1 is the amplitude of exponential decay. Initial fitting parameters were set as a0 = min(MTRasymΔCr), a1 = max(MTRasymΔCr) − min(MTRasymΔCr), and TCr = 60 s, with bound constraints a1 > 0 and TCr > 0. The coefficient a1 was used to quantify the exercise-induced increase in MTRasym. Pre-exercise B0-corrected MTRasymPre values for each muscle were obtained from the coefficient c0 in Equation (2).
To assess the effects of B0-correction, uncorrected MTRasym values were averaged across all pixels in each muscle at each time point. The exercise-induced change was then calculated as the difference between post-exercise MTRasymPost at the first time point immediately after exercise and the pre-exercise baseline MTRasymPre. Additionally, we retrospectively analyzed our previously published CrCEST MRI data [33]. These data were acquired at six frequency offsets (±1.5, ±1.8, and ±2.1 ppm), enabling assessment of Cr recovery kinetics using two approaches: (i) the conventional method, which evaluates CrCEST using all six offsets with a temporal resolution of 30 s, and (ii) our proposed method, which uses only two offsets (±1.8 ppm) with the same temporal resolution, hereafter referred to as low-temporal-resolution OXCEST (LTR-OXCEST). This design allowed direct comparison between the established and proposed approaches. Notably, when exponential fitting of Cr recovery data was performed using the conventional approach, the estimated TCr values in some cases exceeded physiologically reported ranges; therefore, for comparison purposes, TCr values were capped at 300 s.
3.4.2. 31P-MRS
The 31P-MRS spectra were phase- and baseline-corrected, then fitted with Lorentzian functions. The PCr peak area was quantified from each FID and normalized to the corresponding pre-exercise value. Post-exercise PCr levels were expressed as a percentage of the pre-exercise level. The PCr recovery time constant (TPCr) was estimated by fitting the data to a mono-exponential growth function: [34]
| (7) |
where b0 represents the normalized PCr level at the first post-exercise time point, and b1 is the amplitude of recovery.
In addition, the exercise-induced pH shift was estimated from the chemical shift difference between PCr and inorganic phosphate (Pi) (δ) in 31P-MRS spectra using the adjusted Henderson-Hasselbalch equation: [35]
| (8) |
where pKA = 6.75 is the dissociation constant of Pi, δHA = 3.27 is the chemical shift of the protonated form of Pi, and δA = 5.63 is the chemical shift of the non-protonated form of Pi.
3.5. Statistical Analysis
Linear regression was performed to evaluate the relationship between TCr and TPCr, and a two-sided p value was calculated to test the significance of the association. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was also used to assess the agreement between the two measures. Since the majority of the 31P-MRS signal acquired using a surface coil originates from the gastrocnemius muscle [21], the mean TCr values from the LG and MG were used for statistical comparison with TPCr. The coefficient of determination (R2) and an F-statistic were calculated from the least squares fit of a 2nd-order polynomial relating MTRasymPre to ΔB0Pre in LG, MG, and Sol. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the predicted B0-corrected MTRasymPre and the exercise- induced increases in MTRasym. Following mono-exponential fitting of Cr recovery in LG, MG, and Sol, the root mean squared error (RMSE), R2, and standard deviation (SD) of residual noise (reported as a percentage of exercise-induced MTRasym increase) were determined. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
4. Results
4.1. Demonstration of Fast B0 Correction in OXCEST
The OXCEST approach is illustrated in Figure 1. First, the LG, MG, and Sol muscles were manually segmented on a reference anatomical image of the calf (Figure 1A). Pixel-wise MTRasymPre values were then calculated from the corresponding CEST-weighted images (Figure 1B), and a ΔB0Pre map was derived from the pre-exercise WASSR scan (Figure 1C). In the MG muscle, scatterplots of MTRasymPre versus ΔB0Pre demonstrated a strong quadratic relationship (Figure 1D), with the second-order polynomial fit described by the following equation: MTRasymPre = 5.91 + 152 × ΔB0Pre—191 × ΔB0Pre2 (R2 = 0.97, p < 0.001). The B0-corrected baseline MTRasymPre in MG was estimated by setting the ΔB0Pre = 0, yielding a net value of 5.91% (95% CI: 5.74%−6.08%). Analogous analysis for LG (Figure S2A) and Sol (Figure S2B) yielded baseline B0-corrected MTRasymPre values of 6.76% (95% CI: 6.37%−7.15%) and 7.2% (95% CI: 7.01%−7.29%), respectively. Following exercise, the ROIs were re- segmented on the post-exercise CEST-weighted images to account for any positional changes (Figure 1E). Pixel-wise MTRasymPost values were computed from OXCEST images (Figure 1F), and a ΔB0Post map was obtained from a WASSR scan (Figure 1G). In MG, scatterplots of MTRasymPost versus ΔB0Post are shown in Figure 1H. The black crosses represent pixel-wise MTRasymΔB0 values predicted using Equation (3). The vertical distance between each MTRasymPost and its associated MTRasymΔB0 represents the Cr-specific signal change (MTRasymΔCr) per pixel. Similar exercise-related increases in Cr were observed in LG and Sol. The subject-specific fitted coefficients (c0, c1, c2) describing the relationship between MTRasymPre and B0Pre for LG, MG, and Sol are rovided in Table S1. Among these, coefficient c2 exhibited the greatest variability across subjects, followed by c1, while c0 was the most stable. This trend was consistent across all three muscles.
FIGURE 1.

Demonstration of the OXCEST approach in a 35-year-old female participant. (A) Segmentation of the lateral gastrocnemius (LG), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and soleus (Sol) muscles on a pre-exercise axial anatomical calf image. (B, C) Pre-exercise magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasymPre) map acquired at +1.8 ppm and the corresponding B0 inhomogeneity (ΔB0Pre) map derived from a WASSR scan, both overlaid on the segmented muscle masks. (D) Pixel-wise regression of MTRasymPre against ΔB0Pre in MG; the dotted line represents the 2nd-order polynomial fit. (E) Segmentation of the three muscles on a post-exercise axial anatomical calf image. (F, G) Post-exercise MTRasym (MTRasymPost) and ΔB0 (ΔB0Post) maps acquired following mild plantar-flexion exercise. (H) Scatterplot of MTRasymPost versus ΔB0Post in MG (circles). Black crosses indicate the expected value of MTRasym due solely to B0 changes (MTRasymΔB0), assuming no change in creatine (Cr) concentration. Thus, the Cr-related change in Maksym is quantified as the vertical distance between each circle and its corresponding cross, representing the ΔB0-corrected Cr effect.
4.2. Post-Exercise Cr Recovery Mapped by OXCEST
Figure 2 shows representative B0-uncorrected MTRasymPost maps and B0-corrected MTRasymΔCr maps, acquired with OXCEST over a 10-min recovery period. Pixel intensities reflect the Cr-specific MTRasym signal, with red denoting elevated values and blue indicating baseline values. At 10 s post-exercise, all three muscle groups displayed a marked increase in free Cr levels. During the first minute of recovery, Cr levels decreased rapidly as they rephosphorylate to PCr via the CK reaction.
FIGURE 2.

Effect of OXCEST-based B0 correction on post-exercise MTRasym, acquired at 10 s temporal resolution over a 10-min recovery period. Shown are pixel-wise MTRasymPost maps (in %) from a representative axial slice of the lower leg encompassing the soleus (Sol), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), and medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscles: (A) without B0 correction, and (B) with B0 correction. Without B0 correction, MTRasym values frequently extended beyond physiologically plausible limits. Following B0 correction, elevated MTRasym observed immediately post-exercise reflects an increased Cr level, which decays exponentially over time. This spatiotemporally resolved mapping of Cr dynamics enables visualization of muscle-specific variations in mitochondrial OXPHOS capacity.
Table 1 summarizes muscle-wise B0-corrrected MTRasymPre, exercise-induced increases in MTRasym, and the goodness-of-fit (R2) values for the polynomial function f. Across LG, MG, and Sol, R2 values were consistently high (LG: 0.87 ± 0.07, p < 0.001; MG: 0.98 ± 0.01, p < 0.001; Sol: 0.96 ± 0.03, p < 0.001). Net MTRasymPre values were 6.03% ± 1.7% in LG, 6.76% ± 0.5% in MG, and 6.87% ± 0.4% in Sol for all the subjects. Narrow 95% CIs for MTRasymPre were observed in MG and Sol, as well as in LG of four subjects with constrained shimming. In contrast, in the three subjects without constrained shimming, B0 inhomogeneity exceeded 0.1 ppm in the LG, resulting in wider 95% CIs. Pre- and post-exercise ΔB0 values are reported in Table S2. The largest exercise-induced increase in MTRasym was observed in LG (11.4% ± 4.5%), followed by MG (8% ± 2.4%) and Sol (4% ± 2%), all with narrow 95% CIs. Parameters from mono-exponential fitting of Cr recovery are presented in Table S3, with R2 values > 0.97 in both LG and MG. Net MTRasymPre values, together with post-exercise changes with and without B0 correction, are presented in Table S4. Without B0-correction, MTRasymPre values ranged widely from −34% to +28.7%. Finally, post-exercise changes in MTRasym and the corresponding TCr values for the TA muscle are summarized in Table S5. Both parameters demonstrated high inter-subject variability.
TABLE 1.
Metrics derived from OXCEST method.
| ID | MTRasymPre versus B 0Pre (R 2) |
B 0-corrected MTRasymPre |
Exercise-induced increase in MTRasym |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG | MG | Sol | LG | MG | Sol | LG | MG | Sol | |
| 1 | 0.833 | 0.98 | 0.912 | 4.49 (3.1, 5.9) |
7.1 (7, 7.2) |
6.9 (6.8, 7.1) |
18.3 (17.6, 19) |
8.9 (8.7, 9.2) |
6 (5.8, 6.2) |
| 2 | 0.962 | 0.992 | 0.967 | 6.8 (6.4, 7.2) |
5.9 (5.7, 6.1) |
7.2 (7, 7.3) |
9.3 (9.1, 9.5) |
9.3 (9.1, 9.5) |
2.4 (2.1, 2.6) |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.982 | 0.955 | 5.7 (5.4, 5.9) |
6.3 (5.6, 6.9) |
7.1 (7, 7.2) |
6.4 (6, 6.8) |
5.9 (5.7, 6.1) |
1.6 (1.1, 2) |
| 4 | 0.841 | 0.975 | 0.927 | 8 (5, 10.9) |
7.4 (7.2, 7.5) |
6.8 (6.7, 6.9) |
10.6 (10.4, 10.8) |
12.1 (11.9, 12.3) |
5.3 (5.1, 5.5) |
| 5 | 0.881 | 0.981 | 0.982 | 8.7 (5.5, 11.8) |
6.8 (6.6, 6.9) |
7 (6.9, 7.2) |
5.3 (5.1, 5.5) |
4.1 (3.9, 4.3) |
1.5 (1.4, 1.7) |
| 6 | 0.952 | 0.996 | 0.993 | 4.5 (−3.8, 12.7) |
6.4 (6.3, 6.6) |
5.9 (5.8, 6) |
15.8 (15.5, 16.2) |
7.8 (7.7, 8) |
6.3 (6.1, 6.5) |
| 7 | 0.86 | 0.985 | 0.981 | 4 (0.5, 7.4) |
7.4 (7.3, 7.5) |
7.2 (7.1, 7.4) |
14.1 (13.6, 14.6) |
8.2 (7.9, 8.5) |
5 (4.9, 5.2) |
Note: Some values are reported as mean (95% confidence interval).
4.3. Comparison of OXCEST-Derived Cr and 31P-MRS-Derived PCr Recovery
Figure 3 shows the comparison between OXCEST-derived post-exercise Cr recovery kinetics and the ground truth post-exercise PCr recovery kinetics in the same subject. Both recovery profiles were well described by mono-exponential fits. The TPCr measured by 31P-MRS was 32 s. Using OXCEST, TCr values were 27 s in LG, 25 s in MG, and 29 s in Sol. Figure 3C illustrates the fitted post-exercise PCr recovery curve alongside the fitted average post-exercise Cr recovery curve from LG and MG, demonstrating close agreement between OXCEST and 31P-MRS. TPCr and TCr for all subjects in this study are summarized in Table 2. The average TPCr measured was 51 ± 15 s, while the TCr values were 56 ± 19 s (LG), 58 ± 29 s (MG), and 52 ± 33 s (Sol). The combined TCr of LG and MG showed a significant correlation with TPCr (R2 = 0.83, p = 0.005) (Figure 4). A CCC value of 0.81 was found between TCr and TPCr, suggesting good agreement [36]. Representative Sol recovery curves of subjects 5 and 7 with very low TCr values are presented in Figure S3. Additionally, exercise did not induce any appreciable changes in pH values in six of the seven subjects (Table S6), while subject 2 exhibited a pH change of 0.7.
FIGURE 3.

Comparison of post-exercise phosphocreatine (PCr) and creatine (Cr) recovery kinetics measured using 31P-MRS and OXCEST. (A) Non-localized 31P-MRS shows mono-exponential PCr recovery. (B) OXCEST-derived Cr signal demonstrates mono-exponential decay in lateral gastrocnemius (LG), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and soleus (Sol). (C) Mono-exponential fits of PCr recovery and mean Cr recovery (LG and MG) reveal closely matched time constants: TPCr = 32 s and TCr = 26 s.
TABLE 2.
Recovery time constants derived from OXCEST and 31P-MRS (n = 7).
| ID | 31P-MRS TPCr (s) | OXCEST TCr (s) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG | MG | Sol | ||
| 1 | 41.06 | 46.15 | 66.54 | 90.4 |
| 2 | 32.24 | 27.19 | 25.27 | 29.33 |
| 3 | 50.43 | 71.04 | 65.23 | 72.46 |
| 4 | 42.74 | 38.94 | 21.37 | 96.52 |
| 5 | 83.28 | 87.96 | 112.39 | 14.56 |
| 6 | 47.24 | 65.95 | 45.34 | 49.84 |
| 7 | 59.77 | 56.66 | 67.92 | 11.75 |
FIGURE 4.

Regression analysis comparing post-exercise creatine (Cr) recovery time constant (TCr) measured using OXCEST and phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery time constant (TPCr) determined with 31P-MRS. A significant linear correlation was observed between TCr and TPCr (R2 = 0.83, p = 0.005), with a good agreement between the two measurements (Lin’s CCC = 0.81). The dashed ellipse denotes the 95% confidence interval.
Furthermore, retrospective analysis of Cr recovery rates in LG, MG, and Sol from conventionally acquired six-offset, 30-s temporal resolution CrCEST data demonstrated a strong correlation (R2 = 0.77, p < 0.001) and good agreement (Lin’s CCC = 0.83) between TCr estimates derived from LTR-OXCEST and conventional CrCEST (Figure S4).
5. Discussion
In this study, we introduced OXCEST, a novel imaging method for mapping skeletal muscle OXPHOS by applying a fast B0 correction approach for accurately estimating post-exercise Cr recovery kinetics. The OXCEST approach further demonstrated strong agreement with the gold-standard technique, 31P-MRS.
By sampling only two frequency offsets, the OXCEST approach generates B0-corrected, Cr-specific MTRasym images, enabling the capture of post-exercise Cr recovery dynamics at very high temporal resolution. This is critical, as the literature reports TPCr values ranging from 20 to 60 s in healthy adults [11, 37], implying that approximately 63% of post-exercise PCr recovery occurs within the first TPCr seconds. Given that PCr resynthesis is stoichiometrically coupled with a corresponding decrease in free Cr, capturing the rapid Cr dynamics in muscle demands high temporal resolution. In our study, OXCEST-derived TCr was significantly correlated with and showed good agreement with 31P-MRS-derived TPCr, a marker of mitochondrial OXPHOS capacity. Additionally, the high R2 values for the mono-exponential fits in both LG and MG indicate that the model explains over 97% of the variance in the Cr recovery data, supporting the appropriateness of the mono-exponential model for describing post-exercise Cr dynamics. Therefore, the OXCEST approach serves as a valuable complement to the 31P-MRS technique and offers a non-invasive tool for quantifying skeletal-muscle energetics in clinical settings.
We found that the 2nd-order polynomial relationship between MTRasymPre and ΔB0Pre closely matched previously reported findings in a pH imaging study in rats [23]. In our study, this fit yielded strong R2 values within the observed ΔB0Pre range of −0.25 to +0.25 ppm, indicating robustness across modest B0 inhomogeneity. We postulate that the proposed B0-correction approach in this study will be valid if the pre- and post-exercise B0 are within moderate drifts (≤ 0.25 ppm) away from the label frequency of 1.8 ppm. Under these conditions, MTRasym can still be reliably estimated using the proposed framework. However, in the absence of adequate shimming, large ΔB0 deviations may introduce DS-related contamination of the CEST signal, thereby compromising the validity of the relationship. Further higher order polynomial forms of the fitting function f may be appropriate when the Lorentzian linewidth of the Cr amine proton CEST pool is narrow or Cr levels are low.
Next, we found the net B0-corrected MTRasymPre values for each muscle group to be approximately 6%−7%. Reliable estimation of this parameter requires the presence of regions within the muscle where ΔB0 values are close to zero. When ΔB0 values within a muscle are confined to a narrow range offset from 0 ppm, the estimate of the y-intercept c0 in Equation (2) exhibits high variability, leading to wide 95% CIs. The MG and Sol consistently satisfied this criterion, with a fraction of their ROIs lying within the ΔB0 ranges close to 0 ppm across all seven subjects. In contrast, the three LG cases that failed to meet this criterion were those in which global rather than local shimming was applied. Reported Cr-weighted CEST studies have demonstrated comparable MTRasymPre values, supporting the validity of our OXCEST-based quantification [19, 21, 22, 27, 33, 38]. The exercise-induced increase in MTRasymΔCr was found to be highest in LG, followed by MG and Sol, consistent with previous findings. The consistently narrow 95% CIs for these measurements further confirm that OXCEST provides robust MTRasymPost maps and that initial shimming was not a limiting factor.
We found that the first minute post-exercise is particularly critical for accurately characterizing the mono-exponential dynamics of Cr recovery. In healthy skeletal muscle, TPCr typically ranges from 20 to 60 s [11, 37]. Owing to its exponential nature, a muscle with TPCr = 20 s recovers ˜95% of PCr within the first minute post-exercise, whereas a muscle with TPCr = 60 s only recovers ˜63% over the same duration. This underscores the advantage of OXCEST’s expedient B0-correction algorithm, which enables 10 s temporal resolution and thereby allows detailed sampling of the steep early recovery phase. The strong correlation between OXCEST-derived TCr and 31P-MRS-derived TPCr further validates the accuracy of this method.
Post-exercise ΔMTRasym and TCr capture complementary aspects of muscle energetics. ΔMTRasym primarily reflects the magnitude of immediate muscle activation, that is, the extent of Cr accumulation during exercise. In contrast, TCr characterizes the rate of conversion of Cr back to PCr via CK and therefore serves as an indicator of mitochondrial OXPHOS capacity. Importantly, the degree of muscle activation does not necessarily predict recovery kinetics. For example, a localized 31P-MRS study [39] reported low TPCr values (< 20 s) in the soleus of several subjects, even when exercise-induced PCr depletion was substantial (˜50%). LG, MG, and Sol also differ in structure and fiber-type composition. The soleus is enriched in oxidative (“slow-twitch”) fibers (80%; range: 64%−100%) compared with gastrocnemius (57%; range: 34%−82%) [40]. Oxidative fibers have slower contraction rates, higher mitochondrial content, greater reliance on OXPHOS, and higher resistance to fatigue [41]. This intrinsic variability in fiber type composition of the three muscles contributes to both interindividual and intermuscular differences in TCr.
Although the TA is generally regarded as a negative control during plantar flexion exercises, both TCr values and post-exercise increases in MTRasym in our cohort exhibited substantial inter-subject variability. While one study reported less than a 1% increase in TA MTRasym following mild exercise [22], other investigations, including unpublished data from our group, have demonstrated measurable TA activation during plantar flexion [33, 42]. This variability is likely attributable to inadvertent TA engagement in some individuals, potentially arising from differences in leg or ankle positioning on the pedal or uneven force application required to maintain the prescribed exercise load [43, 44].
Regarding the specificity of OXCEST towards Cr, Chen et al. [17] reported that PCr exhibits a CEST resonances near the Cr peak at +1.8 ppm downfield of water, with the extent of this overlap dependent on B1. In this study, the PCr-related ΔZ effect at ˜1.95 ppm diminished at B1 amplitudes ≥ 1 μT. In the present work, the OXCEST acquisitions were performed at a B1 of 3 μT, a level at which prior studies have shown PCr contribution to be minimal [18]. Therefore, we consider any residual PCr overlap to have minimal impact on the specificity of Cr quantification in our approach.
Any factor that influences CEST contrast, such as T1 and T2 alterations, is expected to affect the accuracy of Cr quantification [45]. While strenuous exercise to the point of fatigue can alter T1 and T2* [46], there is no evidence to suggest that mild exercise, such as that performed in our study, induces significant changes in muscle T1 and T2. Indeed, a previous study found no appreciable T2 alterations following mild exercise [22]. Although our participants also performed only mild exercise, we did not specifically evaluate the potential influence of T2* on MTRasym.
Exercise can induce shifts in muscle position as well as subtle anatomic changes, including transient post-exercise hypertrophy. To minimize potential shifts, the leg was stabilized by packing the coil with memory foam to provide sufficient restraint during exercise. To address geometric changes, we implemented a rigorous protocol in which muscle-specific ROIs were re-segmented on each post-exercise CEST-weighted image. This procedure was repeated iteratively until muscle boundary stability was confirmed across consecutive time points, thereby ensuring accurate and consistent tracking of muscle-specific recovery dynamics.
Although in this study, we acquired baseline MTRasym prior to exercise to provide a reference and to aid in B0 correction. However, as this study focused on post-exercise changes in OXCEST contrast, the necessity of pre-exercise scans is limited. In fact, acquiring such baseline data following the exercise paradigm may be more motion-robust and ensure consistency of slice positioning between baseline and post-exercise acquisitions. Future work will therefore evaluate whether post-exercise baseline scans provide a more practical and reliable strategy for B0 correction and comparison.
This study has certain limitations. First, we used the WASSR approach to generate pre- and post-exercise ΔB0 maps [28]. A foundational assumption of the OXCEST framework is that B0 inhomogeneity remains stable post-exercise. However, gradual field drift may still occur due to the heating of scanner components during gradient-intensive MR sequences, as previously reported in NOE experiments [24, 47]. Similar local magnetic field drifts are also well recognized in functional MRI studies [48]. In addition, post-exercise changes such as muscle recovery or subtle calf movement can affect the B0, potentially introducing errors in correction. To mitigate such effects, an interleaved gradient echo-based B0 mapping sequence could be implemented alongside the CEST acquisition to regress out frequency drifts [49]. Acquiring dynamic ΔB0 along with each frequency offset pair will enable accurate computation of MTRasymΔB0, and subsequently MTRasymΔCr and TCr, making OXCEST more robust to motion and the resulting B0 fluctuations over time. Second, our study included only healthy volunteers. In subjects with neuromuscular diseases, lactate accumulation can significantly lower intracellular pH, altering exchange rates and leading to the underestimation of the CEST contrast [19]. Notably, pH-dependent effects have been addressed in recent work by Philip Zhe Sun through the inclusion of an additive correction term [23]. Third, while our assumption that APT and rNOE contributions at ±1.8 ppm are negligible at B1 = 3 μT is supported by studies in brain tissue [24–26], no analogous investigations have been performed in skeletal muscle, where macromolecular content and exchange properties may differ. Finally, OXCEST and 31P-MRS recovery data were acquired in separate sessions on different days. Although exercise bouts were standardized, inter-session variability may have influenced direct comparisons. A larger-scale study with simultaneous monitoring of PCr and Cr recovery kinetics is needed to confirm reproducibility and robustness. Although the comparison between conventionally acquired CrCEST data used to assess conventional TCr and LTR-OXCEST demonstrated good agreement, a dedicated study with optimized acquisition parameters for both OXCEST and CrCEST will be necessary to accurately determine the advantages of higher temporal resolution in characterizing Cr recovery kinetics. Such a comparison would be valuable to further substantiate the accuracy and reliability of this novel technology.
6. Conclusion
In this study, we introduced OXCEST, an advanced technique for mapping skeletal muscle OXPHOS by quantifying Cr using dual frequency offset CEST acquisitions. We demonstrated its feasibility by capturing dynamic post-exercise metabolic changes in healthy participants and validated its performance against the gold standard 31P-MRS. These results highlight OXCEST’s potential as a non-invasive alternative for in vivo assessment of skeletal muscle mitochondrial OXPHOS. Moreover, the principles underlying OXCEST are broadly applicable to other CEST-based imaging approaches, particularly those requiring high temporal resolution to monitor physiological or pharmacological intervention.
Supplementary Material
Supporting Information
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section.
Figure S1: Schematic of the imaging protocol for Oxidative Phosphorylation Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (OXCEST) and 31 P-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (31P-MRS) foreach subject. MRI scans were performed over two separate sessions on different days. During each session, participants performed mild plantar flexion exercise inside the scanner for 2 min at a rate of 45 flexions per minute.
Figure S2: Pixel-wise scatterplot of Oxidative Phosphorylation Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (OXCEST) magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) versus main magnetic field inhomogeneity (ΔB0) in the lateral gastrocnemius (panel A) and soleus (panel) of the same representative subject shown in Figure 1. Black crosses indicate pre-exercise MTRasym (MTRasymPre); colored hollow circles represent post-exercise MTRasym (MTRasymPost).
Figure S3: Representativefit curves for two subjects with unusually short creatine recovery time (TCr) of less than 15 s.
Figure S4: Comparison of creatine (Cr) recovery time constants (TCr) obtained using conventional CrCEST (six frequency offsets) and low-temporal-resolution OXCEST (LTR-OXCEST, two frequency offsets), both with a temporal resolution of 30 s. Each point represents data from lateral gastrocnemius (LG, red triangles), medial gastrocnemius (MG, green circles), or soleus (Sol, blue squares). Results demonstrated strong correlation (R2 = 0.77, p < 0.001) and good agreement (Lin’s CCC = 0.83) between methods.
Table S1: Fitted coefficients of OXCEST that modeled MTRasymPre against B0Pre in lateral gastrocnemius (LG), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and soleus (Sol) muscles.
Table S2: mrm70133-sup-0001-Supinfo.docx. B0 values (in ppm) pre-and post-exercise in lateral gastrocnemius (LG), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and soleus (Sol) muscles.
Table S3: Noise level and goodness-of-fit metrics for mono-exponential Creatine recovery in lateral gastrocnemius (LG), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and soleus (Sol) muscles.
Table S4: Effect of B0 correction on MTRasym in lateral gastrocnemius (LG), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and soleus (Sol) muscles.
Table S5: OXCEST metrics in tibialis anterior (TA) across all subjects (n = 7).
Table S6: Exercise-induced pH changes derived from 31P-MRS spectra.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ms. Jennifer Valley with MRI scanning, Dr. Mitchell Taylor for technical support with metronome, and Ms. Pamela Adede for assistance with participant recruitment.
Funding:
This work was supported by the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (U01CA301480), American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, and St. Jude Comprehensive Cancer Center (NIH P30CA021765).
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available upon request.
References
- 1.Pesta D, Anadol-Schmitz E, Sarabhai T, et al. , “Determinants of Increased Muscle Insulin Sensitivity of Exercise-Trained Versus Sedentary Normal Weight and Overweight Individuals,” Science Advances 11, no. 1 (2025): eadr8849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kawamata H and Manfredi G, “Proteinopathies and OXPHOS Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Journal of Cell Biology 216, no.12 (2017): 3917–3929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mancuso M, Angelini C, Bertini E, et al. , “Fatigue and Exercise Intolerance in Mitochondrial Diseases. Literature Revision and Experience of the Italian Network of Mitochondrial Diseases,” Neuromuscular Disorders 22, no. 3 (2012): S226–S229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wallace DC, “A Mitochondrial Bioenergetic Etiology of Disease, “Journal of Clinical Investigation 123, no. 4 (2013): 1405–1412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xu Y, Xue D, Bankhead A 3rd, and Neamati N, “Why All the Fuss About Oxidative Phosphorylation (OXPHOS)?,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 63, no. 23 (2020): 14276–14307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Acin-Perez R, Beninca C, Shabane B, Shirihai OS, and Stiles L, “Utilization of Human Samples for Assessment of Mitochondrial Bioenergetics: Gold Standards, Limitations, and Future Perspectives,” Life (Basel) 11, no. 9 (2021): 949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meyerspeer M, Boesch C, Cameron D, et al. , “(31) P Magnetic Reso-nance Spectroscopy in Skeletal Muscle: Experts’ Consensus Recommendations,” NMR in Biomedicine 34, no. 5 (2020): e4246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kemp GJ, Ahmad RE, Nicolay K, and Prompers JJ, “Quantification of Skeletal Muscle Mitochondrial Function by 31P Magnetic Reso-nance Spectroscopy Techniques: A Quantitative Review,” Acta Physiologica (Oxford, England) 213, no. 1 (2015): 107–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meyer RA, “A Linear Model of Muscle Respiration Explains Monoexponential Phosphocreatine Changes,” American Journal of Physiology 254, no. 4 Pt 1 (1988): C548–C553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lanza IR, Bhagra S, Nair KS, and Port JD, “Measurement of Human Skeletal Muscle Oxidative Capacity by 31P-MR Spectroscopy: A Cross-Validation With In Vitro Measurements,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 34, no. 5 (2011): 1143–1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lewsey SC, Weiss K, Schar M, et al. , “Exercise Intolerance and Rapid Skeletal Muscle Energetic Decline in Human Age-Associated Frailty,” JCI Insight 5, no. 20 (2020): e141246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hargreaves M and Spriet LL, “Skeletal Muscle Energy Metabolism During Exercise,” Nature Metabolism 2, no. 9 (2020): 817–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Walsh B, Tonkonogi M, Soderlund K, Hultman E, Saks V, and Sahlin K, “The Role of Phosphoryl creatine and Creatine in the Regulation of Mitochondrial Respiration in Human Skeletal Muscle,” Journal of Physiology 537, no. Pt 3 (2001): 971–978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jett S, Boneu C, Zarate C, et al. , “Systematic Review of (31)P-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Studies of Brain High Energy Phosphates and Membrane Phospholipids in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 15 (2023): 1183228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jing Y, Haeger A, Boumezbeur F, Binkofski F, Reetz K, and Romanzetti S, “Neuroenergetic Alterations in Neurodegenerative Dis-eases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vivo(31)P-MRS Studies,” Ageing Research Reviews 101 (2024): 102488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sassani M, Alix JJ, McDermott CJ, et al. , “Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Reveals Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,” Brain 143, no. 12 (2020): 3603–3618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen L, Barker PB, Weiss RG, van Zijl PCM, and Xu J, “Creatine and Phosphocreatine Mapping of Mouse Skeletal Muscle by a Polynomial and Lorentzian Line-Shape Fitting CEST Method,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 81, no. 1 (2019): 69–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Haris M, Nanga RP, Singh A, et al. , “Exchange Rates of Creatine Kinase Metabolites: Feasibility of Imaging Creatine by Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI,” NMR in Biomedicine 25, no. 11(2012): 1305–1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Haris M, Singh A, Cai K, et al. , “A Technique for In Vivo Mapping of Myocardial Creatine Kinase Metabolism,” Nature Medicine 20, no. 2(2014): 209–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ju L, Schar M, Wang K, et al. , “Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation Capacity in Skeletal Muscle Measured by Ultrafast Z-Spectroscopy (UFZ) MRI at 3T,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 93, no. 3 (2025): 1273–1284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kogan F, Haris M, Debrosse C, et al. , “In Vivo Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging of Creatine (CrCEST) in Skeletal Muscle at3T,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 40, no. 3 (2014): 596–602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kogan F, Haris M, Singh A, et al. , “Method for High-Resolution Imaging of Creatine In Vivo Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 71, no. 1 (2014): 164–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sun PZ, “Fast Correction of B(0) Field Inhomogeneity for pH-Specific Magnetization Transfer and Relaxation Normalized Amide Proton Transfer Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke Without Z-Spectrum,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 83, no. 5 (2020): 1688–1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jones CK, Huang A, Xu J, et al. , “Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement (NOE) Imaging in the Human Brain at 7T,” NeuroImage 77 (2013): 114–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.van Zijl PCM, Lam WW, Xu J, Knutsson L, and Stanisz GJ, “Magnetization Transfer Contrast and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI. Features and Analysis of the Field-Dependent Saturation Spectrum,” NeuroImage 168 (2018): 222–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jin T, Wang P, Zong X, and Kim SG, “MR Imaging of the Amide-Proton Transfer Effect and the pH-Insensitive Nuclear Overhauser Effect at 9.4 T,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 69, no. 3 (2013): 760–770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.DeBrosse C, Nanga RPR, Wilson N, et al. , “Muscle Oxidative Phosphorylation Quantitation Using Creatine Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CrCEST) MRI in Mitochondrial Disorders,” JCI Insight 1, no. 18(2016): e88207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim M, Gillen J, Landman BA, Zhou J, and van Zijl PC, “Water Saturation Shift Referencing (WASSR) for Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) Experiments,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 61, no. 6(2009): 1441–1450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Homma T, Hamaoka T, Sako T, et al. , “Muscle Oxidative Metabolism Accelerates With Mild Acidosis During Incremental Intermittent Isometric Plantar Flexion Exercise,” Dynamic Medicine 4, no. 1 (2005): 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu J, de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Murphy-Boesch J, and Duyn JH, “Effect of Head Motion on MRI B(0) Field Distribution,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 80, no. 6 (2018): 2538–2548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Singh A, Cai K, Haris M, Hariharan H, and Reddy R, “On B1 Inhomogeneity Correction of In Vivo Human Brain Glutamate Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Contrast at 7T,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 69, no. 3 (2013): 818–824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sun PZ, Zhou J, Huang J, and van Zijl P, “Simplified Quantitative Description of Amide Proton Transfer (APT) Imaging During Acute Ischemia, “Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 57, no. 2 (2007): 405–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chakraborty K, Burman R, Nisar S, et al. , “Reliability of In Vivo Creatine-Weighted Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CrCEST) MRI in Calf Skeletal Muscle of Healthy Volunteers at 3 T,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 61 (2024): 1681–1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Forbes SC, Slade JM, and Meyer RA, “Short-Term High-Intensity Interval Training Improves Phosphocreatine Recovery Kinetics Following Moderate-Intensity Exercise in Humans,” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 33, no. 6 (2008): 1124–1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Valkovic L, Chmelik M, and Krssak M, “In-Vivo(31)P-MRS of Skeletal Muscle and Liver: A Way for Non-Invasive Assessment of their Metabolism,” Analytical Biochemistry 529 (2017): 193–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Clarke CJ, Gurka MJ, Norton PT, Kramer CM, and Hoyer AW, “Assessment of the Accuracy and Reproducibility of RV Volume Measurements by CMR in Congenital Heart Disease,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 5, no. 1 (2012): 28–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Menon RG, Xia D, Katz SD, and Regatte RR, “Dynamic(31)P-MRI and (31)P-MRS of Lower Leg Muscles in Heart Failure Patients,” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1 (2021): 7412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Armbruster RR, Kumar D, Benyard B, et al. , “Personalized and Muscle-Specific OXPHOS Measurement With Integrated CrCEST MRI and Proton MR Spectroscopy,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 5387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fiedler GB, Schmid AI, Goluch S, et al. , “PCr Recovery Rates of Gastrocnemius Medialis and Soleus Muscles at Various Exercise Levels,” paper presented at International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gollnick PD, Sjodin B, Karlsson J, Jansson E, and Saltin B, “Human Soleus Muscle: A Comparison of Fiber Composition and Enzyme Activities With Other Leg Muscles,” Pflügers Archiv / European Journal of Physiology 348, no. 3 (1974): 247–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mishra P, Varuzhanyan G, Pham AH, and Chan DC, “Mitochondrial Dynamics Is a Distinguishing Feature of Skeletal Muscle Fiber Types and Regulates Organellar Compartmentalization,” Cell Metabolism 22,no. 6 (2015): 1033–1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schur GM, Dunn J, Nguyen S, et al. , “In Vivo Assessment of OXPHOS Capacity Using 3 T CrCEST MRI in Friedreich’s Ataxia,” Journal of Neurology 269, no. 5 (2022): 2527–2538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kovacs B, Csala D, Yang S, Tihanyi J, Gu Y, and Hortobagyi T, “Knee Position Affects Medial Gastrocnemius and Soleus Activation During Dynamic Plantarflexion: No Evidence for an Inter-Muscle Compensation in Healthy Young Adults,” Biology Open 13 (2024): bio061810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Avancini C, de Oliveira LF, Menegaldo LL, and Vieira TM, “Variations in the Spatial Distribution of the Amplitude of Surface Electromyograms Are Unlikely Explained by Changes in the Length of Medial Gastrocnemius Fibres With Knee Joint Angle,” PLoS One 10, no. 5 (2015): e0126888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schmid AI, Schewzow K, Fiedler GB, et al. , “Exercising Calf Muscle T(2) * Changes Correlate With pH, PCr Recovery and Maxi-mum Oxidative Phosphorylation,” NMR in Biomedicine 27, no. 5 (2014): 553–560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fleckenstein JL, Canby RC, Parkey RW, and Peshock RM, “Acute Effects of Exercise on MR Imaging of Skeletal Muscle in Normal Volunteers,” AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 151, no. 2 (1988): 231–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Windschuh J, Zaiss M, Ehses P, Lee JS, Jerschow A, and Regatte RR, “Assessment of Frequency Drift on CEST MRI and Dynamic Cor-rection: Application to gagCEST at 7 T,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 81, no. 1 (2019): 573–582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kopel R, Sladky R, Laub P, et al. , “No Time for Drifting: Comparing Performance and Applicability of Signal Detrending Algorithms for Real-Time fMRI,” Neuro Image 191 (2019): 421–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Poblador Rodriguez E, Moser P, Dymerska B, et al. , “A Comparison of Static and Dynamic ΔB(0) Mapping Methods for Correction of CESTMRI in the Presence of Temporal B(0) Field Variations,” Magnetic Reso-nance in Medicine 82, no. 2 (2019): 633–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available upon request.
